Ishi

No.9 3 4 4 5 6 9 9 13 15 15 17 21 23 27 31 2 1990 95 3 1 1 65 1 50 50 1 (2000) 4 1989 2 20% 26% 90 1 2 89 12 5 95 3 94 96 98 99 5 4 50 4 1 3 5 700 1,200 40 1,000 2 87 70% 15 60% 12 89 50% 5 3 95 1 4 90

Winter 図 1 図 OECD OECD OECD OECD 2003

266 Vol. 44 No. 3 I 序論 Mirrlees 1971 Diamond 1998 Saez 2002 Kaplow 2008 1 700 900 1, 300 1, 700 II III IV V II わが国の再分配の状況と国際比較 OECD Forster and Mira d Ercole 2005 2006 2001 Winter 08 267 図 1 図 2 2000 2

C. R. McKenzie 2003 3 2004 ( 38 ) 2 2004 2005 (Keio Household Panel Survey) control group treatment group 1

KEIO UNIVERSITY MARKET QUALITY RESEARCH PROJECT (A 21 st Century Center of Excellence Project) DP2005-020 * C. R. McKenzie** 2003 3 2004 ( 38 ) 2 2004 2005 (Keio Household Panel Survey) control group treatment

2 Tobin (1958) 2 limited dependent variables: LDV 2 corner solution 2 truncated censored x top coding censor from above censor from below 2 Heck

10 2 1 2007 4 6 25-44 57% 2017 71% 2 Heckit 6 1 2 Tobin (1958) 2 limited dependent variables: LDV 2 corner solution 2 truncated 50 50 censored x top coding censor from above censor from below 2 Heckit

Becker 1965 Gronau a a a

1 1 1 1 1 3.3 6 0.43 0.45 2 2002 Becker1965 Gronau1977 1 a 3.3 3.6 6.0 4.9 4.8 3.6 a 7.4 8.4 8.1 7.6 7.5 6.5 0.45 0.43 0.74 0.64 0.64 0.55 1995 a Vol. 42 No. 2 II III IV V VI VII 1 1998Nishioka 199820022002

橡同居選択における所得の影響（DP原稿）.PDF

** *** * 2000 13 ** *** (1) (2) (1986) - 1 - - 2 - (1986) Ohtake (1991) (1993) (1994) (1996) (1997) (1997) Hayashi (1997) (1999) 60 Ohtake (1991) 86 (1996) 89 (1997) 92 (1999) 95 (1993) 86 89 74 79 (1986)

,,,

法定割増賃金率の引き上げが時間外労働時間 * および有給休暇の付与 取得に与える影響 深堀遼太郎萩原里紗 Keio Household Panel Survey: KHPS Difference in Differences DD ,,, Hamermesh, Trejo, Keio Household Panel Survey: KHPS KHPS URL http://www.mhlw.go.jp/topics/

税制改正にともなう家計の所得弾性値 : 高齢者パネルデータによる実証分析

Kwansei Gakuin University Rep Title Author(s) 税制改正にともなう家計の所得弾性値 : 高齢者パネルデータによる実証分析 Uemura, Toshiyuki, 上村, 敏之 ; Kitamura Takayuki, 金田, 陸幸 Citation 経済学論究, 69(4): 1-16 Issue Date 2016-3-20 URL http://hdl.handle.net/10236/14671

Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization Quarterly Journal of Economics Review of Economics and Statistics Internal Labor Markets and Manpower Analysis Economics of Education Review Journal of Political

DP

KEIO UNIVERSITY MARKET QUALITY RESEARCH PROJECT (A 21 st Century Center of Excellence Project) DP2004-13 * ** * ** Graduate School of Economics and Graduate School of Business and Commerce, Keio University

#10094931_信金7月号.indb

2006. 7 2006 7 2 4 24 41 58 84 85 97 99 2006 7 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55

橡DP9802.PDF

21 Japan s Labor Force in the Year 2020 2020 2020 600 30 60 65 30 21 20 20 2020 2020 (1) 1 (2) (3) 1 1992 9 2025 2025 1997 1 2050 10 2050-1 - consensus estimate 21 (1995) (1997) (estimation) calibration

No.42 2010.9 30 4 EITC, Earned Income Tax Credit WTC, Working Tax Credit; CTC, Child Tax Credit GSTC, Goods and Services Tax Credit 3 5 2006 a2006 b 2

1 16 2 3 2008 4 4 in work tax credit welfare to work ALMPs 1990 *1965 1988 1994 1988 2003 2007 2007 2009 35 2009 1 20 2 21 1 21 3 No.42 2010.9 30 4 EITC, Earned Income Tax Credit WTC, Working Tax Credit;

Psacharopulos Psacharopulos and Patrinos (1) Byron and Takahashi McMahon and Boediono Duflo (2)

Psacharopulos Psacharopulos and Patrinos (1) Byron and Takahashi McMahon and Boediono Duflo (2) (3) Survei Sosial Economi NasionalNational Socio-economic Survey SUSENAS KorModul (4) SUSENAS (5) (6) t

取引銀行の破綻が企業経営に及ぼす影響について－阪和銀行破綻の事例分析－

2 JEL Classification: G21, G14 Key words: e-mail y-murakami@aria.ocn.ne.jp 1 The Effect of Bank Failure on Client Firms A Study on the Hanwa Bank s Failure By Yoshiko Murakami Abstract The financial theories

untitled

2 21 1984 50 3500 4200 1 3 1 1985 1984 1 2 1984 50 3 2 3 4 1 1989 35 3 4 5 22 3 1 19811984 19841987 1989 1981 1985 13 1984 1984 1986 1985 20 10 1987 10 2 36 1989 65 1989 1953 1985 60 1933 6.71% 43 3.15%53

2 1,2, , 2 ( ) (1) (2) (3) (4) Cameron and Trivedi(1998) , (1987) (1982) Agresti(2003)

3 1 1 1 2 1 2 1,2,3 1 0 50 3000, 2 ( ) 1 3 1 0 4 3 (1) (2) (3) (4) 1 1 1 2 3 Cameron and Trivedi(1998) 4 1974, (1987) (1982) Agresti(2003) 3 (1)-(4) AAA, AA+,A (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (1)-(5) 1 2 5 3 5 (DI)

<96D889BA904D2E696E6464>

615 379 1 1995 10 OECD 1995 380 616 57 3 1993 4 3071 2003 1 3247 10 10 4 1 1990 2000 2003 10 617 381 2002 2 3 4 5 2 1 1990 1995 1995 12 1995 IPP Independent Power Producer 1 2004a, b 2005a, b 382 618 57

2) 3) 2) Ohkusa, 1996 ; 1999 ; Ohtake and Ohkusa, 1994 ; La Croix and A. Kawamura, Reject American Economic Review, Journal of Political Econom

1) IOC Major League Baseball s MLB Blue Ribbon Panel Levin et al. 1) Yamamura and Shin, 2005 a ; 2005 b ; 2005 c communication 2) 3) 2) Ohkusa, 1996 ; 1999 ; Ohtake and Ohkusa, 1994 ; La Croix and A. Kawamura,

SUSENAS Kor Modul (2) (3) (4)

(1) Survei Sosial Economi NasionalNational Socio-economic Survey SUSENAS Kor Modul (2) (3) (4) SUSENAS SUSENAS SUSENAS / (5) t p t p SUSENAS t SUSENAS SUSENAS t p ( ( t p SUSENAS t SUSENAS (6) Oey-Gardiner

60 Vol. 44 No. 1 2 準市場 化の制度的枠組み: 英国 教育改革法 1988 の例 Education Reform Act a School Performance Tables LEA 4 LEA LEA 3

Summer 08 59 I はじめに quasi market II III IV V 1 II 教育サービスにおける 準市場 1 教育サービスにおける 準市場 の意義 Education Reform Act 1988 1980 Local Education Authorities LEA Le Grand 1991 Glennerster 1991 3 1 2 3 2 60 Vol. 44

遺産相続、学歴及び退職金の決定要因に関する実証分析　『家族関係、就労、退職金及び教育・資産の世代間移転に関する世帯アンケート調査』

2-1. (2-1 ) (2-2 ) (2-3 ) (Hayashi [1986]Dekle [1989]Barthold and Ito [1992] [1996]Campbell [1997] [1998]Shimono and Ishikawa [2002]Shimono and Otsuki [2006] [2008]Horioka [2009]) 1 2-1-1 2-1-1-1 8 (1.

Law and Economics Review vol.4,no.1(february 2009) 1998

Law and Economics Review vol.4,no.1(february 2009) 1998 1 500 No.93 1999114 2 195072119885021 19901991 3 Foreign Investment and National Security Act of 200720071024effective 1986 CFIUS2008831CFIUS web

Title ベンチャー企業の研究開発支出の決定要因 日本と台湾の事例を中心に Author(s) 蘇, 顯揚 Citation 經濟論叢 (1996), 158(1): Issue Date URL Right

Title ベンチャー企業の研究開発支出の決定要因 日本と台湾の事例を中心に Author(s) 蘇, 顯揚 Citation 經濟論叢 (1996), 158(1): 54-76 Issue Date 1996-07 URL https://doi.org/10.14989/45083 Right Type Departmental Bulletin Paper Textversion publisher

4 2 p = p(t, g) (1) r = r(t, g) (2) p r t g p r dp dt = p dg t + p g (3) dt dr dt = r dg t + r g dt 3 p t p g dt p t 3 2 4 r t = 3 4 2 Benefit view dp

( ) 62 1 1 47 2 3 47 2 e-mail:miyazaki@ngu.ac.jp 1 2000 2005 1 4 2 p = p(t, g) (1) r = r(t, g) (2) p r t g p r dp dt = p dg t + p g (3) dt dr dt = r dg t + r g dt 3 p t p g dt p t 3 2 4 r t = 3 4 2 Benefit

わが国企業による資金調達方法の選択問題

* takeshi.shimatani@boj.or.jp ** kawai@ml.me.titech.ac.jp *** naohiko.baba@boj.or.jp No.05-J-3 2005 3 103-8660 30 No.05-J-3 2005 3 1990 * E-mailtakeshi.shimatani@boj.or.jp ** E-mailkawai@ml.me.titech.ac.jp

2 3 4 II. 8 10 12 14 20 8 6,000 3,695 61.6 10 6,000 3754 62.6 12 5,010 3,111 62.1 149,000558362.0 62% 4 2059 ++5 4 78.3 (2%) 2002 3 8 10,12 14 8

453200810 I. Dicks-Mireaux and King (1983)Hubbard (1985) Dicks-Mireaux and King (1983)Hubbard (1985)(1990)(2000) Attanasio and Brugiavini(2003), Attanasio and Rohwedder(2003) (unobservable) heterogeneity

日本の世帯属性別貯蓄率の動向について：アップデートと考察

RIETI Discussion Paper Series 18-J-024 RIETI Discussion Paper Series 18-J-024 2018 年 8 日本の世帯属性別貯蓄率の動向について : アップデートと考察 1 宇南 卓 ( 経済産業研究所 ) 野太郎 ( 信州 学 ) 要 旨 全国消費実態調査 家計調査 家計消費状況調査を補完的に利用することでマクロ統計と整合的な貯蓄率のデータを構築した宇南山

制度の実証分析DP（鈴木）No3.PDF

1 1988 2005 9 * B ** 2 1988 18 1988 64 Difference in Difference Model 1.2 1.7% 1.12.5 18 3 1. 13 6 13 14 18 1 1963 1 1988 65 64 2 Natural Experiment 64 65 1988 (1984) (1984) (1987) (1987) 1989 Ito and

_16_.indd

well-being well-being well-being Cantril Ladder well-being well-being Cantril Self-Anchoring Striving Scale Cantril Ladder Ladder Ladder awellbeing well-being well-being Gallup World Poll World Database

160_cov.indd

3 1 2 3 1. 2. 2.1 7 3 1996 welfare to work 2. 1 195 196 197 198 99 Autumn 7 No. 16 4. 3.5 3. 2.5 2. 1.5 1..5. 195 1952 1954 1956 1958 196 1962 1964 1966 1968 197 1972 1974 1976 1978 198 1982 1984 1986

46−ª3�=4�“ƒ‚S“·‚Ö‡¦

463420101 1. 1989, Yoshida and Rasche1990, Rasche1990, 19921997, Fujiki and Mulligan1996, 1996, Sekine1998, 2001, Fujiki2002, 2003, 2004 Bahmani-Oskooee and Shabsigh1996, Amano and Wirjanto2000, Bahmani-Oskooee

戦間期日本企業の資金調達、資本コスト、資本構成：最適資本構成理論からみた1930年代における企業財務

1930 Modigliani and Miller [1958] 170 1930 2008 7 16 I E-mail: takashi.nanjou@boj.or.jp E-mail: cc00881@srv.cc.hit-u.ac.jp //2009.7 81 1. 1 2 M&A 3 4 1965 1969 1995 1995 1993 1 2008 2008 1985 2006 10 ROA

Value Added Tax VAT Mirrlees, J. VAT The Mirrlees Review The Structure and Reform of Direct Taxation Report of a Committee chaired by Professor J. E. Meade Dimensions of Tax Design Mirrlees 2010 Tax by

ミクロ・データによる家計行動分析： 将来不安と予備的貯蓄

subjective measures E-mailkeiko.murata@mfs.cao.go.jp subjective subjective measures Dardanoni Leland waiting option Browning and LusardiEngen and Gruber Carroll and Samwick PSIDPanel Study of Income Dynamics

Stepwise Chow Test * Chow Test Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Riddell Riddell first step second step sub-step Step

Stepwise Chow Test * Chow Test Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Riddell Riddell first step second step sub-step Stepwise Chow Test a Stepwise Chow Test Takeuchi 1991Nomura

4.9 Hausman Test Time Fixed Effects Model vs Time Random Effects Model Two-way Fixed Effects Model

1 EViews 5 2007 7 11 2010 5 17 1 ( ) 3 1.1........................................... 4 1.2................................... 9 2 11 3 14 3.1 Pooled OLS.............................................. 14

Hi-Stat Discussion Paper Series No.248 東京圏における 1990 年代以降の住み替え行動 住宅需要実態調査 を用いた Mixed Logit 分析 小林庸平行武憲史 March 2008 Hitotsubashi University Research Unit

Hi-Stat Discussion Paper Series No.248 東京圏における 1990 年代以降の住み替え行動 住宅需要実態調査 を用いた Logit 分析 小林庸平行武憲史 March 2008 Hitotsubashi University Research Unit for Statistical Analysis in Social Sciences A 21st-Century

２

fukui@econ.tohoku.ac.jp http://www.econ.tohoku.ac.jp/~fukui/site.htm 200 7 Cookbook-style . (Inference) (Population) (Sample) f(x = θ = θ ) (up to parameter values) (estimation) 2 3 (multicolinearity)

untitled

[ 研究ノート ] 4% 19 19 20 1997a 20 Mitchell, 2002: 123 208 1997b; 2008 2 1960 1980 Abdel-Fadil, 1975; Hansen, 1969; Radwan & Lee, 1986 Abdel-Fadil, 1980; 85 Assaad, 1997 2 Hopkins Hopkins & Westergaard, 1998:

JSPS Grants-in-Aid for Creative Scientific Research Understanding Inflation Dynamics of the Japanese Economy Working Paper Series No.7 日本家計の消費 貯蓄 労働プロ

Title 日本家計の消費 貯蓄 労働プロファイル Author(s) 阿部, 修人 ; 稲倉, 典子 Citation Issue 2007-02-14 Date Type Technical Report Text Version publisher URL http://hdl.handle.net/10086/13627 Right Hitotsubashi University Repository

Kobe University Repository : Kernel タイトル Title 著者 Author(s) 掲載誌 巻号 ページ Citation 刊行日 Issue date 資源タイプ Resource Type 版区分 Resource Version 権利 Rights DOI

Kobe University Repository : Kernel タイトル Title 著者 Author(s) 掲載誌 巻号 ページ Citation 刊行日 Issue date 資源タイプ Resource Type 版区分 Resource Version 権利 Rights DOI 平均に対する平滑化ブートストラップ法におけるバンド幅の選択に関する一考察 (A Study about

untitled

IV 1 IV 2 (i) 2 0.13 0.23 1 (i) 3 ( 0.11 0.19 0.5% 2 (ii) 1% (ii) 1,000, 1,000 (1 Q) G A 0.02 {e i ) 1} Q (e 5 1) 0.02 β Ρ (iii) 1 1 QG {e ig ( i G ) 1} QG (e 5 1) Ρ e in e i G n Q e in 1 e i G n 1 1 1

Masanori Hashimoto Rene Fahr and Hilmar Schneider 1. Hashimoto, Masanori Fahr, Rene and Hilmar Schneider Hashimoto, Masanori 2004 Fahr

17 6 22 Masanori Hashimoto Rene Fahr and Hilmar Schneider 1. Hashimoto, Masanori Fahr, Rene and Hilmar Schneider 2. 2004 Hashimoto, Masanori 2004 Fahr, Rene and Hilmar Schneider 2004-1 - Fahr and Schneider2004

BB 報告書完成版_修正版）040415.doc

3 4 5 8 KW Q = AK α W β q = a + α k + βw q = log Q, k = log K, w = logw i P ij v ij P ij = exp( vij ), J exp( v ) k= 1 ik v i j = X β αp + γnu j j j j X j j p j j NU j j NU j (

フィナンシャルレビュー　第80号

March Eichner et al. Tobit Tobit Buntin and Zaslavsk Duan et al.hay and Olsen Mullahy Tobit ARMA Feenberg and Skinner French and Jones Eichner et al. Eichner et al i t m i,t Em i,t Prm i,t!prm i,t Em i,t

自殺の経済社会的要因に関する調査研究報告書

17 1 2 3 4 5 11 16 30,247 17 18 21,024 +2.0 6 12 13 WHO 100 14 7 15 2 5 8 16 9 10 17 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 II I 18 Durkheim(1897) Hamermesh&Soss(1974)Dixit&Pindyck(1994) Becker&Posner(2004) Rosenthal(1993)

% 1% 37% 1 2

. 1. 2. 3. 3-1 3-2 3-3 3-4. 1. 2. 3. 4.. 1. 2. 3. 4.. 1. 2. 3.FORTRAN -1- 1 2002 2 2002-2- 2002 690 10% 1% 37% 1 2 20% -3- 1. 2. 3. 4. -4- 2002 1 24 1949 5 9 5 74% 50% -5- 1. 1 16 23 1 2001 25 1992 3 3

,.,,.,. NIRA,.,.,,, GDP.,., 1%, 2.0% 3).,,.,,., 1, 4).,,.,, GDP,.,,.,,,.,,., 2002.,,., 3), Q&A Q16 (http://www.stat.go.jp/data/kakei/qa-1.ht

1, 1, 2011 4 3-28,,.,,.,.,,.,,.,,.,.,. 1., 1), 1946.,, GDP,.,,,.,,., (2008) ( NIRA ), 23,.,,, 2).,,,.,,.,,., 657-8501 2-1, E-mail: unayama@person.kobe-u.ac.jp 1) 1. 2), 1990 2 21, 1993 6 12. 3 1 1 2011

12056286_03.indd

: 82 1 2013 7 2010 2011 1 30 2010 30 2011 30 2010 9 10 11 2011 1 2 1 2010 9 UK UK UK UK UK p. 843 45 82 1 1 UK 9 9 2007-08 UK 30% 30 20%30 150 30 32.5% 2030% p. 843 3 2004-05 5% 5% 75% p. 843 2010 11 1963

時間割引：双曲割引と弱加法性

Discussion aper No. 666 June 2006 The Institute of Social and Economic Research Osaka University 6-1 Mihogaoka, Ibaraki, Osaka 567-0047, Japan Time Discounting: Declining Impatience and Interval Effect

p *2 DSGEDynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium New Keynesian *2 2

2013 1 nabe@ier.hit-u.ac.jp 2013 4 11 Jorgenson Tobin q : Hayashi s Theorem : Jordan : 1 investment 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 *1 *1 93SNA 1 p.180 1936 100 1970 *2 DSGEDynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium New Keynesian

untitled

2 book conference 1990 2003 14 Repeated Cross-Section Data 1 M1,M2 M1 Sekine(1998) Repeated Cross-Section Data 1 1. (1989), Yoshida and Rasche(1990), Rasche(1990), 19921997, Fujiki and Mulligan(1996),

Attendance Demand for J-League õ Shinsuke KAWAI* and Takeo HIRATA* Abstract The purpose of this study was to clarify the variables determining the attendance in J-league matches, using the 2,699 J-league

株式保有構成と企業価値 ─コーポレート・ガバナンスに関する一考察─

q E-mail: kenji.nishizaki@boj.or.jp E-mail: kurasawa@ynu.ac.jp OECD Vives Tirole Shleifer and Vishny q %% %% % % Allen and Gale %% % Admati, Pfreiderer and Zechner Burkart, Gromb and Panunzi Cremer 1995Pagno

50-4 平井健之.pwd

GDP GNP Gupta 1967, Wagner and Weber 1977, Mann 1980, Abizadeh and Gray 1985, Ram 1987, Abizadeh and Yousefi 1988, Nagarajan and Spears 1990 GDP GNP GDP GNP GDP GNP Adolph Wagner Wagner 1967 Ram 1987,

292 Vol. 44 No refundable tax credit Mirrlees 1971 Friedman

Winter 08 291 I はじめに Shinozaki 2005 2006 OECD United Nations 2007 OECD 2008 2 1 2006 2005 2 2006 refundable tax credit 2006 292 Vol. 44 No. 3 3 1 2 refundable tax credit 3 10 5 5 10 5 2 1 Mirrlees 1971

repocost.PDF

178 2 10 8 39-52 (tax planning) [Scholes and Wolfson,1992] (tax cost saving hypothesis) (accounting choice) (economic consequences) (financial reporting costs) (1) (financial reporting cost hypothesis)

Public Investment, the Rate of Return, and Optimal Fiscal Policy Economic Growth Pioneering Economic Theory Mathematical Theories of Economic Growth Review of Economic Studiesvol.27 Econometrica vol.34

Winter 2009 No Lower Earnings Limit

特集 : イギリスの社会保障 - ニューレイバーの 10 年 イギリスの公的 私的年金制度改革 丸谷浩介 I 1 50 1997 II 1. 2 15 Winter 2009 No. 169 8 3 4 1999 1989 8 2. 4 1 2 1 1992 6 16 Lower Earnings Limit1 65 60 1 2 16 2.40 16 2 1 5 1 2 3. 6 1970 State

No.14

No.14 2 5 5 8 10 12 22 24 26 28 28 31 34 40 43 48 49 50 52 55 1 6 2002 1991 1 1 2 3 1 () 2 4 5 81 86 2 natural experiment 81 86 1 81 86 90 (Dual Income Tax) 3 91 2 4 81 86 1981 Economic Recovery Tax Act

62

UNDP GEM 61 62 o 63 64 65 IPU IPU 66 o 67 68 69 IPU o 70 71 72 73 ,, NGO NGO IPU 74 NGO o 75 76 Sawer, Marian. 2000. Parliamentary Representation of Women: From Discourses of Justice to Strategies of Accountability,

OECD INVEST JAPAN jp/ij/index.htm

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org) Title OECD 諸国における経営資源の収益率の推計 Sub Title Rates of return on managerial resources : the case of OECD countries Author 遠藤, 正寛 (Endoh, Masahiro) Publisher 慶應義塾大学出版会 Publication

Preliminary Version Manning et al. (1986) Rand Health Insurance Experiment Manning et al. (1986) 3 Medicare Me

Preliminary Version. 600 * 14530029 12-1- Preliminary Version. 1 70 1 1997 9 1020 70 1 3 2 70 1 Manning et al. (1986) Rand Health Insurance Experiment 25 50 Manning et al. (1986) 3 Medicare Medicare Medicare

Constitution State colonies Provisions State Nutmeg State Land of Steady Habits Quinnehtukqut Quinnihtukqut Nautilus American Turtle Yankee Omi Omi Shonin Edo The Theory of Environmental Policy A Listing

=

2002 2594 2161 40.5 1975 32 2002 8.8 1975 5.1 3.7 15 = 1 2002 1 20 50 90 2529 4549 2 2 1975 2002 2529 3034 2 977 760 419 53.1 52.8 51.8 3 3 2002 (1) 784 535 415 411 65.5 61.5 46.1 4 4 4 1 1 30 40 2 1991

村本　孜５１‐８５／５１‐８５

One for all, all for one. One for all, all for one. ( One for all, all for one. ) One for all, all for one. ( One for all, all for one. ) One for all, all for one. Manes, A. (1877~1963) [2006] p. 37 Raiffisen

An Empirical Study of the Securities Firms' Dilemma on Financial Innovation through Diffusion of Internet Deals Yasugi Satoshi Bower, J. L., 1999, Disruptive technologies: Catching the wave,

A5 PDF.pwd

Average Treatment Effect; ATE attributes Randomized Factorial Survey Experiment; RFSE cues ATE ATE Hainmueller et al. 2014 Average Marginal Component Effect ATE 67 4 2017 2 845 , ;, ATE, ;, ;, W 846 67

日本における結婚観の変化―JGSS累積データ を用いた分析―

JGSS 2000-2010 JGSS Changes in Attitudes toward Marriage in Japan: Analyses Using the JGSS Cumulative Data 2000-2010 Sayaka K. SHINOHARA JGSS Research Center Osaka University of Commerce Using the Japanese

政治参加としての自治・町内会参加者の実証分析

JES JES input S. Verba, N. H. Nie NPO NPO NHK R. Pekanen .... %........................................ N JES Ses Socio-economic states H. E. Brady, S. Verba, K. L. Schlozman a civic skills H. E. Brady,

<90AD8DF489C88A D322E696E6462>

Graduate School of Policy and Management, Doshisha University 27 2011 11 2011 2011 10 2013 1950 1 1953 12 atoms for peace 2 3 1948 1960 1956 4 1958 1 1955 2 1957 IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency

64-5 増山裕一.pwd

DHC GHQ Single Married Filing Jointly Married Filing, Sixteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution Revenue Act of 1913 United States General Accounting Office 1979, p. 1. Revenue Act of

1: 合計特殊出生率 出生率の推移 暦年 アメリカドイツフランス スウェーデン日本 Apps and Re

1 1 Galor and Weil (1996) (Sleebos, 2003) 2-1, E-mail: koba@econ.kobe-u.ac.jp 1 1: 合計特殊出生率 2.20 2.00 1.80 1.60 1.40 1.20 1.00 出生率の推移 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 暦年 アメリカドイツフランス スウェーデン日本 1997 1999 2001

＜テーマ＞

1 2 3 4 1 2004 12 2 1261 8 (2004) 3 ( ) 1261 19 (2004) 4 5 6 1 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 13 14 15 2 16 1718 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 5 ( )15 (1988) () ( ) 95 208 (1991) 6 ( ) 374 2)(2002) 7 ( 8 )80 8 119 (1965)

SNAと家計調査における貯蓄率の乖離－日本の貯蓄率低下の要因－

RIETI Discussion Paper Series 10-J-003 RIETI Discussion Paper Series 10-J-003 2009 年 12 月 SNA と家計調査における貯蓄率の乖離 - 日本の貯蓄率低下の要因 - 宇南山卓 ( 神戸大学大学院経済学研究科 ) 要 旨 SNA と家計調査から計算される家計貯蓄率の乖離の原因を明らかにし 日本の貯蓄率の低下の原因を考察した

CHUO UNIVERSITY 3

2 CHUO UNIVERSITY 3 4 CHUO UNIVERSITY 5 6 CHUO UNIVERSITY 7 8 Journal of Economic Behavior and Orgnanization Games and Economic Behavior Journal of Comparative Economics CHUO UNIVERSITY 9 10 CHUO UNIVERSITY

Autumn II III Zon and Muysken 2005 Zon and Muysken 2005 IV II 障害者への所得移転の経済効果 分析に用いるデータ

212 Vol. 44 No. 2 I はじめに 2008 1 2 Autumn 08 213 II III Zon and Muysken 2005 Zon and Muysken 2005 IV II 障害者への所得移転の経済効果 17 18 1 分析に用いるデータ 1 2005 10 12 200 2 2006 9 12 1 1 2 129 35 113 3 1 2 6 1 2 3 4 4 1

04_田平正典.indd

8 61832015 1 61 GKS Becker and Fuest2003 GKS 1 1 1 1 1 3 10 25 NEEDS Financial QUEST 1 2014882013 0.25510.2070.0756 0.3564 10.0756 62 1 Feldstein and Summers1979 Devereux and Griffith2003 Gordon, Kalambokidis

日本労働研究機構『ＩＴ活用企業についての実態調査』及び

March 200 1 1 15 29 49 5 59 2000 2007 2007 2007 5 2008 3 B 1 3 2005 20 44 2 1 2 3 1 2 3 2 4 2003 General Social Surveys 2003 5 5 20 49 2005 5 2 2008 3 31 2007 B 2007 2008 3 200418 49 50 2005 30 1990

Brennan, G. and Lomasky, L., Democracy and Decision : The Pure Theory of Electoral Preference, Cambridge: Cambridge U. P., 1993. Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller W. E., and Stokes, D. E., Elections

,

JOC , , HP http://www.nta.go.jp pp. 426455 NPO pp. 766810 , Internal Revenue Service 2012 Publication 547, Casualties, Disasters, and Thefts 2012 Returns, pp. www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/p.pdf2013. 3. 20

こんにちは由美子です

Prevalence (proportion) 1. 1991 23.8 2. 1960 52 85 2477 310 cross sectional study prevalence Time referent: prevalence 1985 40 45 prevalence 0.5 80 85 43 Time referent 1985 time referent Risk and Cumulative

448 Vol. 44 No 図

Spring 09 447 概要 2004 1 2 I はじめに 19 2007 1. 34 2006 1. 32 90 1 90 Galor and Weil 1996 1996 1999 90 Sleebos 2003 Apps and Rees 2004 Martínez and Iza 2004 448 Vol. 44 No. 4 2. 20 2. 00 1. 80 1. 60 1. 40

32 constructivism Rawls 1971, pp. 137, 158 Rawls 1971, pp Dworkin 2000, p Cohen 1989, p. 931 option luck neutralization Dworkin 200

32 2017 p.31 43 VS Rawls 1971 G A reasonably brute luck luck egalitarianism social cooperation social relations egalitarianism veil of ignorance original position 32 constructivism Rawls 1971, pp. 137,

所得税の税収構造の要因分解による実証分析 : 所得控除の税収ロスと税率変更による増収額の試算

Kwansei Gakuin University Rep Title Author(s) 所 得 税 の 税 収 構 造 の 要 因 分 解 による 実 証 分 析 : 所 得 控 除 の 税 収 ロス と 税 率 変 更 による 増 収 額 の 試 算 Uemura, Toshiyuki, 上 村, 敏 之 Citation 経 済 学 論 究, 66(2): 119-135 Issue Date

Tezukayama RIEB Discussion Paper Series No. 7 地方政府間の距離が財政調整に対する態度に与える影響 - 独裁者ゲーム実験からの示唆 - 竹本亨 小川一仁 高橋広雅 鈴木明宏 伊藤健宏 帝塚山大学 関西大学 広島市立大学 山形大学 岩手県立大学 経済学部 社

Tezukayama RIEB Discussion Paper Series No. 7 地方政府間の距離が財政調整に対する態度に与える影響 - 独裁者ゲーム実験からの示唆 - 竹本亨 小川一仁 高橋広雅 鈴木明宏 伊藤健宏 帝塚山大学 関西大学 広島市立大学 山形大学 岩手県立大学 経済学部 社会学部 国際学部 人文学部 総合政策学部 2013 年 11 月 Tezukayama University

untitled

The Japanese Association for Behavior Analysis Newsletter, No. 35 The Japanese Association for Behavior Analysis Newsletter, No. 35 The Japanese Association for Behavior Analysis Newsletter, No. 35 Table

49

\n Title カルドア勧告とは何だったのか - 企業 未分割家族 農 業所得の観点 - Author(s) 五嶋, 陽子, Gotoh, Yoko Citation 商経論叢, 49(1): 49-62 Date 2013-09-10 Type Departmental Bulletin Paper Rights publisher KANAGAWA University Repository

shuron.dvi

01M3065 1 4 1.1........................... 4 1.2........................ 5 1.3........................ 6 2 8 2.1.......................... 8 2.2....................... 9 3 13 3.1.............................

untitled

Workforce 2000 Personnel HR FocusPersonnel Administrator HRMagazine Workforce 2000 Workforce 2000 Workforce 2000 Workforce 2000 et al Harvard Business Review Workforce 2000 et al Harvard Business Review

第2章 経済成長と所得分配: マレーシアの事例を中心に

2006 1970 1990 U 1 GDP GDP GDP 1970 1 1969 5 13 5 13 New Economic Policy: NEP NEP 2 NEP 1971 1990 National Development Policy: NDP 1991 2000 Vision Development Policy: VDP 2001 2010 NEP NEP 1990 1980 1

日本の教育経済学：実証分析の展望と課題.pdf

ESRI Discussion Paper Series No69 by October 2003 Economic and Social Research Institute Cabinet Office Tokyo, Japan 2 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 6 4 1 2 3 4 * 2003 8 7 B603 4 1 Schultz 1963 Becker 1964 human capital

02古郡氏李氏_a_4.indd

55 2014 e.g2004 2005 2001 1980 101990 1 2 2002 2003 25,000 20038,000 2013 10 2013 1,787 21.623 4,302 1 HUD portal.hud. gov/.../huddoc?id=pih2013 15.pdf... 2 14 105 30,000 25,000 25,296 20,000 15,000 10,000

..,,...,..,...,,.,....,,,.,.,,.,.,,,.,.,.,.,,.,,,.,,,,.,,, Becker., Becker,,,,,, Becker,.,,,,.,,.,.,,

J. of Population Problems. pp.,,,.,.,,. Becker,,.,,.,,.,,.,,,,.,,,.....,,. ..,,...,..,...,,.,....,,,.,.,,.,.,,,.,.,.,.,,.,,,.,,,,.,,, Becker., Becker,,,,,, Becker,.,,,,.,,.,.,, ,,, Becker,,., Becker,

M&A Brav et al.(2005) TOPIX Core30 4 TOPIX Core

1 2 ROE PBR 1 2 3 3.1 3.2 3.3 4 2006 1 2 1906 49.5 90 M&A Brav et al.(2005) 3 2 3 4 2006 1 TOPIX Core30 4 TOPIX Core30 30 5 3 18 12 14 5 4 http://www.tse.or.jp/topix/core30/index.html 5 2001 2005 5 30

商学　６６‐１☆／１６．田口

251 1 2, 3 4, 5 2 1 2005 stakeholder agent p.13 2005 2009, 2011, 2012, 2013 b, 2014 Taguchi et al.2013 Aoki2001, 201019962010 2014 2013! 252 2 " " " " 6 " " " " 7 2! 3 p.5 2013 2011201120132012 Aoki20012004

橡sei_ho52.PDF

Döring(1995) Döring (1995) Baerwald (1974) p. 124 1 Mochizuki (1982) Ramseyer and Rosenbluth (1993) 1 p. 30 Mochizuki Krauss (1984) 2 vs. (1) 41 3 1955 20 10 50 20 56 72 4 67 10 10 69 7 7 73 30 60 30 61