社会イノベーション研究会ソーシャルキャピタルWG 報告書
|
|
- とよみ けいれい
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 (KAIST) 3 2 ( ) PARK SEON WON ( ) KIM HEE TAE ( ) University-Industry Cooperation In Korea KAIST Experience (Kim Hee Tae January 2009) ( KIM HEE TAE ) CONFERENCE KAIST 1 NPO 2 93
2 1: R&D Input USA GDP R&D R&D University-Industry Cooperation In Korea KAIST Experience 2: R&D Output USA R&D University-Industry Cooperation In Korea KAIST Experience (1) IMD(International Management Development) R&D (31.3billion USD) 76.9% 13.2% 9.9% 75% 9.9% R&D 30.6% 2013 R&D 30.6% 50% (KOITA) GDP R&D %(31Bil USD) 5% 3 GDP R&D R&D 1000 R&D Output , & & & Mansfield 7 7 KAIST KAIST SCWG
3 3: IT TBI/TIC % % University-Industry Cooperation In Korea KAIST Experience 4: KAIST R&D (100 ) R&D R&D R&D 0.4% 0.4% 0.6% 0.7% 1.1% University-Industry Cooperation In Korea KAIST Experience KAIST 15.4 R&D R&D 4 KAIST ( 40 ) ( ) KAIST KAIST (2) KAIST KAIST S&T(Science & Technology) % , KAIST TBI/TIC 2006 UIC(University Industry Cooperation) KAIST KOSDAQ Royalty (Million USD) IT 60% KAIST (MIT 0.2 ) 2007 KAIST R&D (Royalty Income/R&D Budget) 1.1% 0.42% 3% Q1: A1: KAIST Q2: SCWG
4 A2: KAIST IT 150 IT Q3: A3: EEWS(Energy Environment Water Sustainability) ( PARK SEON WON ) KAIST KAIST 1992 TIC(Technology Innovation Center)/TBI(Technology Business Incubator) 300 KAIST KAIST MIT KAIST KAIST 400 KAIST (KAIST MPWIZ) MPWIZ KAIST KAIST 1 (20% ) ( )MPWIZ KAIST 32.75% KAIST KAIST MPWIZ IPTV Dubbing HUBO Character SCWG
5 MPWIZ 04.php?mn=4 7-4: HUBO Character Character Character ( ) KIM YOUNG SIK () LEE YOUNG SAM( ) KOREA BUSINESS INCUBATION ASSOCIATION ( ) KIM YOUNG SIK 1 13 (Korean Business Incubation Association) 5: KOREA BUSINESS INCUBATION ASSOCIATION ( ) SCWG
6 6: (84.0%) (6.7%) (2.6%) (3.7%) (3.0%) KOREA BUSINESS INCUBATION ASSOCIATION ( ) 7: 51.2% 832,061m 2 3,093m 2 187m 2 426,200m 2 1,587m 2 96m 2 KOREA BUSINESS INCUBATION ASSOCIATION ( ) 8: 6, KOREA BUSINESS INCUBATION ASSOCIATION ( ) 10% 9: (77.3%) (22.7%) (84%) (11.1%) (1.2%) (3.7%) 269 KOREA BUSINESS INCUBATION ASSOCIATION ( ) 10: (54.3%) (45.7%) KOREA BUSINESS INCUBATION ASSOCIATION ( ) 3 SCWG
7 11: INNO-BIZ ,936 1,145 4, (66.1%) (25.8%) (8.1%) KOREA BUSINESS INCUBATION ASSOCIATION ( ) INNO-BIZ Innovative Business Company INNO-BIZ 12: ,410 2,305,422 8, ,304 1,287,457 4, (76.8%) (74.4%) KOREA BUSINESS INCUBATION ASSOCIATION ( ) 13: , , KOREA BUSINESS INCUBATION ASSOCIATION ( ) 14: , , (9.6%) (4.5%) KOREA BUSINESS INCUBATION ASSOCIATION ( ) 15: ,594 3,630 7,224 1,945 1,967 3,912 2,253 1,995 4,248 1,297 1,028 2,325 9,449 8,620 18,069 KOREA BUSINESS INCUBATION ASSOCIATION ( ) 16: KOSDAQ KOREA BUSINESS INCUBATION ASSOCIATION ( ) SCWG
8 Q1: KAIST KAIST A1: KAIST KAIST (BI) 296 KAIST BI Q2: A3: 5 90 Q3: INNO-BIZ A3: INNO-BIZ Q4: INNO-BIZ A4: INNO-BIZ INNO-BIZ Q5: A:5 Q6: A6: Q7: ENGEL FUND 4 KOSDAQ Korean Securities Dealers Automated Quotations 1996 NASDAQ by Wikipedia SCWG
9 A7: Q8: FUNDRASING A8: Q9: A9: 2-3 (SERI) 3 3 ( ) BOK DUK GYU( ) PARK YONG GYU( ) (1) ) 2) 3) 4) 5) SCWG
10 (2) (3) 1 ( NURI ) Q1: A1: SERI SCWG
11 Q2: A2: Q3: A3: SCWG
12 4 Q4: A4: IPOO(Input Process Output Outcome) Input Process OutputOutcome Output Outcome Q5: A5: ( )13 00 PARK HOEN JUN PARK HOEN JUN ) 1) (Nonprofit) 2) (Nonprofit+Profit) 3) (Profit) 3 (Early Stage) (Later Stage) Early Stage Later Stage SCWG
13 MBA (Tuition Reduction) MBA 80% 20% % Later Stage Early Stage (Mega Fund) 5 Q1: MBA A1: MBA Q2: A2: 2 3 YOENNORI YOENNORI JEON TAE IL Cham Sinanun Ot() SuDaGongBang 35 One Click.Com (Social Lending Service) SCWG
14 One Click.Com P2P(Peer-to-Peer) (1% 99% 11% ) One Click.Com 10 One Click.Com (KOVA) 3 3 ( )16 00 KIM YOUNG SOO ( ) HAN IN BAE ( ) LEE MI SOON ( ) KANG HYEONG JONG () LIM SOO JIN () 2008 KIM YOUNG SOO KOVA 1995 Q1: A1: 5 1 KOVA 100 Q2: A2: 1997 (High Risk High Return) SCWG
15 R&D 5% 15, KOVA Q3: 2 3 A3: KOVA BSI Q4: A4: 50% IT IT BT,NT,CT IT GREEN VENTURE KOVA GREEN VENTURE Q5: A5: (1 2 ) 10% 15, Q6: A6: Q7: SCWG
16 A7: 3 3 1) 2) R&D 3) 73% Q8: Donation % A8: (KICOX) 3 4 ( )10 00 CHOI SOO JUNG ( ) Industrial Complex Cluster Policy( ) Perfection Into Business-friendly New Industrial Complex KICOX Completion of the New Industrial Complex KICOX( ) CHOI SOO JUNG (KICOX) KICOX ( 35 ) KICOX 50% 40% 72% KICOX Q1: A1: % R&D 18.4% 216% Q2: SCWG
17 A2: R&D Q3: A3: KICOX 2 17: (KICOX) , R&D E-CLUSTER ,200 KICOX 01.jsp Q5: A5: 12 R&D Q6: A6: 18: ( ) ,669 7,291 13,875 1,799 15,784 3,949 42,678 KICOX 01.jsp Q7: SCWG
18 A7: (KAIST) Input Output Output 2 KAIST 30 Incubation KAIST Incubation 90 Incubation 3 IT 44% Incubation (IPO) KAIST 7 22 Incubation Policy Incubation 269 Incubation Incubation Incubation 1 SCWG
19 Outcome Output KAIST Incentive 2 Angel 35 50% 40% 72% Top-down SCWG
20 4. Input Process Outcome SCWG
1946 1,
1955 2000 1946 1,000 21 2001 1946 3 1949 1965 36 1970 1987 21 (Shin Sok-ho) (Kim Song-gyun) (Kim Song-gyun) (Choi Yong-hee) (Lee Hyong-jong) (Park Yong-sok) (Lee Won-sun) (Lee Song-mu) 1949.3 1965.2 1965.2.20
More information社会イノベーション研究会ソーシャルキャピタルWG 報告書
21 3 20 17 21 3 1 1 6 1-1................................................. 6 1-2.................................. 6 1-3................ 7 1-4.................................. 8 1-5..........................
More informationVol. 47, No. 1, January 2001
1997 99 GDP 10.7 % 1 1 9 2 1,526 97 2 4 3 98 GDP 5.8 % 4 21 21 29 5 8 6 1970 30 Vol. 47, No. 1, January 2001 OEM 7 1980 R&D 8 100 80 50 9 10 flexible specialization 2 industrial divide 11 31 12 IT IT 21
More information1
CSR 2006 Corporate Social Responsibility Report 1 2 Profile 3 Profile 4 5 6 Management report 7 8 9 10 11 Management report 12 13 14 Company report 15 16 Company report 17 Company report 18 19 Company
More information2 1,384,000 2,000,000 1,296,211 1,793,925 38,000 54,500 27,804 43,187 41,000 60,000 31,776 49,017 8,781 18,663 25,000 35,300 3 4 5 6 1,296,211 1,793,925 27,804 43,187 1,275,648 1,753,306 29,387 43,025
More information韓国における少子化の進展と子育て支援策の展開
2003 2003 6 2003 17 18 ( 2004 40) ( ) ( ) 1 ( ) 2 ( ) 3 89 1994 3 1 4 2 5 3 ( 2002:49) 5 4 ( 1999:257) 5 (2003) 90 (2) ( 1981: 91-102 ( 1997, 1999, 2000, 2003) 3 1 2002 1.17 (,, 1996;,, 2002;,, 2003; 1999,
More information.o...EPDF.p.indd
Social and Environmental report 28 1 2 3 5 7 9 11 12 17 18 19 22 24 25 26 27 28 29 3 2 3 4 5 6 7 4 1 2 5 3 6 8 9 1 1 2 3 4 11 12 1 2 3 4 13 14 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 15 16 17 1 2 3 18 19 1 2 3 4 2 21 1 2 3 4
More informationuntitled
2005 2005 FUJITSU GROUP SUSTAINABILITY REPORT http://jp.fujitsu.com/about/eco/contact/ ' 1 Contents 2005 FUJITSU GROUP SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 2 3 2005 FUJITSU GROUP SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 4 5 2005 FUJITSU
More information老いても美しく輝くために
1998 11-1- 1998 1 1 1979 82 3 1 2 3 20 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 3 1985 3-2- 1998 11 20 2 1985 1985 1-3- 1998 1989 4 3 1 80 5 6 1-4- 1998 1985 1 1 2 2-5- 1998 1 11 11-6- 1998 GDP 16% 19% 1 2 3 14 18 42 3 ( 3) 3-7-
More informationProfile 39% 9,311 33% 7,846 28% 6,853 2
1 Profile 39% 9,311 33% 7,846 28% 6,853 2 Message 3 Vision 4 5 Executive Summary 6 7 Management Systems 8 9 Management Systems 10 11 Design for Environment 12 3R 3R 3R 3R 13 14 Design for Environment P
More information1 1980 5, 2008; Shih, Wang, & Wei, 2007 6 1,342 ha 2009 8,835 2003 1,677 ha 2009 2,412 1995 1,613 ha 2009 4,611 2 1 1990 200 1990, 2008 2 IC 2 2009 IC
ISSN 1347-4448 ISSN 1348-5504 10 3 2011 3 E-mail: kishimoto@icsead.or.jp 100 200 1, 2000 1990 Acer IC Integrated Circuit TSMC IC MediaTek AUO 2011 Global Business Research Center www.gbrc.jp 179 2010 8
More information5 10 10-1 - 5 20-2 - - 3 - - 4 - 22 6 30 10 12 22 7 8 1 30 4 30 1 22 7 14 10 12 20 22 7 21 1 30 3 30-5 - - 6 - - 7 - 11 9 9 14 10 9 15 7 9 10 NPO - 8 - - 15 - - 16 - - 17 - - 19 - - 20 - - 21 - - 22
More information奄美地域の自然資源の保全・活用に関する基本的な考え方(案)
1 15 5 15 16 19 20 2 3 10 25,000 30,000 6 8 710 11 16 4 1213 1415 17 17 28 17 126,483 30 5 70,462 8,572 27,167 14,551 5,731 29 18 560 10 1,032 1 6 1,300 47 28 4 19 1 8 23 17 100 7 15 8 NPO IT 1979 9 NPO
More informationuntitled
1 4 4 6 8 10 30 13 14 16 16 17 18 19 19 96 21 23 24 3 27 27 4 27 128 24 4 1 50 by ( 30 30 200 30 30 24 4 TOP 10 2012 8 22 3 1 7 1,000 100 30 26 3 140 21 60 98 88,000 96 3 5 29 300 21 21 11 21
More informationKBS MBC GATT SBS No
Kojima Hiroyuki 2014 7 4 12 2 SBS K-pop 2012 2 4000 1.8 1 412 2014 8 5 2013 10 11 17 Psy 3 2014 7 25 2014 1990 pop culture Korean Wave plowing model No. 635 2014 10 26 125 126 1990 2008 1990 1 1 1962 1
More informationSpeedSkating-Result.xls
SPEED SKATNG PRTCL Tomakomai Highland Skate Rink Ladies 500M Pair Lane No Name 100m 500m 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 128 ] LEE Min-Ha 12.12 44.28 116 ] KASHWAZAK Arisa 12.31 46.00 108
More information<834C CA48F43838C837C815B83675F967B95B62E696E6464>
3 2017 4 4 9 14 19 23 ( 27 Webtoon 31 36 39 2017 10 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 / 84 88 92 96 99 103 107 111 115 119 123 127 131 135 139 143 147 150 2020 2021 2022 1958 1995 1995 2017 N2607 1995 SSM
More information【PDF】韓国No.3.doc
3 2009 10 28 1 3.1 1967 1976 1995 1999 1 2004 12 31 2005 4 2006 5 2008 12 3.2 1998 2001 21 2012 10 3 5 2 1 2 3 3 2009 10 28 2 2012 100 3.3 (1) 1 2 3 4 31 3 2009 10 28 3 31 3 2009 10 28 (2) 1 2 3 2 1 2
More informationJSPS韓国調査報告書
A-1Hanyang University...3 A-2Yonsei University...8 A-3Seoul National University...13 A-4Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology...18 A-5Ministry of Education...23 A-6Korea University...25 B-1...30
More information〔ものづくり紀行 第三十六回〕
ISSN 1347-4448 ISSN 1348-5504 8 8 (2009 8 ) E-mail: tajinoriko@nifty.com 1. 1.1. 1938 Hewlett-Packard 1950 60 1970 80 Apple Oracle IT 1990 Netscape Google 2006 2009 1.2. 2006 2,357 40 17% 13 6 4 1 260
More information5 I The Current Situation and Future Prospects of the North Korean Economy presented at the 2014 Korea Dialogue Conference on Strengthenin
5 I. 3 1 1990 2 The Current Situation and Future Prospects of the North Korean Economy presented at the 2014 Korea Dialogue Conference on Strengthening North Pacific Cooperation organized by the East-West
More informationISO ,360 UNEP Earthwatch Indicators 2002 Environmental Sustainability Index Private Sector Responsiveness 142 ~ GDP ISO
ISO14000 GRI(Global Reporting Initiative) OECD NGO 500 1 2 LG Environmental Strategy Institute (LGESI) 1 ISO14001 6,360 UNEP Earthwatch Indicators 2002 Environmental Sustainability Index Private Sector
More informationTitle ベンチャー企業の研究開発支出の決定要因 日本と台湾の事例を中心に Author(s) 蘇, 顯揚 Citation 經濟論叢 (1996), 158(1): Issue Date URL Right
Title ベンチャー企業の研究開発支出の決定要因 日本と台湾の事例を中心に Author(s) 蘇, 顯揚 Citation 經濟論叢 (1996), 158(1): 54-76 Issue Date 1996-07 URL https://doi.org/10.14989/45083 Right Type Departmental Bulletin Paper Textversion publisher
More information和RIMNo.22高安氏.indd
NIEsGDP 1990 200436.1 22.365.1 80 GDP 4 RIM 2006 Vol.6 No.22 RIM 2006 Vol.6 No.22 5 NIEs GDP GDP GDP GDP 90 GDP 1951 80 81 90 90 90 2001 2003 GDP 80 90 2001 2002 GDP 87GDP 80 GDP GDP 6 RIM 2006 Vol.6 No.22
More informationContents P. P. 1
Contents P. P. 1 P. 2 TOP MESSAGE 3 4 P. P. 5 P. 6 7 8 9 P. P. P. P. P. 10 11 12 Economy P. P. 13 14 Economy P. 1,078 1,000 966 888 800 787 716 672 600 574 546 556 500 417 373 449 470 400 315 336 218 223
More information- - - - Central Processing Unit 2
13:50 14:30 "Competition Policy in Network Industries" http://www.stern.nyu/edu NET Institute http://www.netinst.org Institute 2 1 Business to Business to Customer yellow pages Yahoo Google 1 1 - - - -
More information第1回土地改良研修会
2006.5.11 26 51 62 8 56 62 6 56 8 3 1-1 - P 1 3 25 1 2 5 2000 3 24 1 2 3 4 1 4 2 2 A4 5 6 2 1961 5 5-2 - 1 1 5 2009 2007 5 3 10 27 8 8 3 3 3 5 10-3 - P 2 3 3 2003 8 29 2003 8 29 3 3 3 2 3 1 1 1 1-4 - 2000
More informationワールド・ワイド 9‐2/8.朴
186 100 40 12 Yoon, 2006. 1 2 IT 1997 IT GDP 1/3 IT IT 2/3 2003 2004 GDP 2 50 Kim Jung, 2005. 12 IT 1999 17.7 IMF 2004 IT 20.4 29.4 3 2005. 12. 26 IT CDMA LCD TV 4 1995 LG 7 IT 5 Lee, 2003 1996 CDMA 5
More information橡計画0.PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 120. ( ) 620 250 29 30 31 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 Return on Risk Assets 57 58
More information<8D918DDB926E88E68CA48B86985F8F572D8D8791CC2E696E6462>
The Communist movement of Koreans and the policy regarding Koreans' in the Chinese Communist Party From the beginning of the 1920s to the Sino-Japanese war 1937 KWEON Young jun This article analyzes the
More information034-047_PS1_hattori.indd
F e a t u r e GLOCOMCAC- 2 a 1 b 2008 5 19 Roger L. Martin and Sally Osberg [2007], Social Entrepreneurship; the case for definition, Stanford Social Innovation Review, 2007 Spring. i n t e l p l a c e
More informationCorporate Social Responsibility Report Contents 2 3
Corporate Social Responsibility Report http://www.kuraray.co.jp/ Corporate Social Responsibility Report Contents 2 3 T o p M e s s a g e Interviewer 4 5 Top Message 6 7 8 9 1 C l o s e u p 2 5 2 C l o
More information1 2 3 4 5 1 1:30 NPO 16 1 19 16 2 17-6 - 10 2008 2010 120 150 IT( ) 60 21 40-7 - - 8-10 ( ) NPO 2 10 16:40-9 - 10 ii NPO NPO ( ) ( ) 11 12 13 14 15 22 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 m3 m3
More informationKAIST
30 11 - - 13 16 18 KAIST 2002 20 24 25 26 28 14 8 29-1- 2004 19-21 KAIST/ TOP30 0302002 4 COE ( 38 ) 37 60 21 21 e-learning KAIST 27 45 59 KAIST 62 38 60 30 MBA 1970 20 3 4 3 CAD/CAM 50 2 1985 12 4 1976
More information1QX
2008 Environment Report by Daiki Aluminium Industry Co., Ltd. 1 C O N T E N T S 1 3 5 6 7 8 9 11 12 13 17 19 21 22 2 G& 3 G & G Top Message Top Message G & G G4 5 6 7 8 9 T O P I C S 10 T O P I C S 11
More information/27 (13 8/24) (9/27) (9/27) / / / /16 12
79 7 79 6 14 7/8 710 10 () 9 13 9/17 610 13 9/27 49 7 14 7/8 810 1 15 8/16 11 811 1 13 9/27 (13 8/24) (9/27) (9/27) 49 15 7/12 78 15 7/27 57 1 13 8/24 15 8/16 12 810 10 40 1 Wikipedia 13 8/18, 8/28 79
More information2010 富士通グループ 社会・環境報告書
Introduction 1 1 3 7 1 6 13 18 19 21 23 27 31 33 34 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51 54 55 57 61 65 67 69 73 74 75 76 77 78 2 9 11 3 2010 FUJITSU GROUP SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 2 Q 3 Q Q Q 2010 FUJITSU GROUP SUSTAINABILITY
More informationNew Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization 2 4 5 6 7 15 17 27 35 41 49 53 55 56 57 57 57 59 63 63 68 68 76 77 78 79 81 81 81 82 82 88 90 91 94 97 98 98 100 103 105 114 114 118
More information2009 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 2 2009 CONTENTS 4 6 8 TOPIC 01 10 TOPIC 02 11 TOPIC 03 12 TOPIC 04 14 TOPIC 05 15 TOPIC 06 15 TOPIC 07 16 18 18 19 20 21 22 22 22 23 24 25 26 27 27 27 28 29 30 TOPIC 08 16 TOPIC 09
More information2 146
28 2004 pp. 145 159 1 Received October 29, 2004 In 1999, North Korea reversed the negative economic growth of the 90s, and displayed a positive trend which, although weak, was maintained at 1.8% in 2003.
More information2008 Contents 1 2 3. 4. 5. http://eco.family.co.jp/ http://www.family.co.jp/company/eco/ecokids/report/ 6. 1 2 3 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 20 22 23 24 28 29 36 38 39 45 46 48 50 52 53 54 56 57 2008 Sustainability
More informationJournal of International and Advanced Japanese Studies Volume 4 / March 2012 1 54
2012 Journal of International and Advanced Japanese Studies Vol. 4, March 2012, pp. 53 65 Doctoral Program in International and Advanced Japanese Studies Graduate School of Humanities and Social Sciences,
More informationde facto GDP 10 2 IMF remittance ODA FDI % ,701 2, ,620 2,
Iguchi Yasushi 1 21 7 1997 2001 WTO fragmentation ASEAN 32006 55% NAFTA 1 on-shoring off-shoring 2 No. 574 2008 9 13 de facto 2 21 2001 05 1 5 1 3 600 4 1GDP 10 2 IMF remittance ODA FDI 5 1 2000 2005 1000
More information<4F495341836A8385815B835832308EFC944E8B4C944F8D862E696E6464>
OITA INFORMATION SERVICE INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION CONTENTS 2009. 3 47 02 OITA INFORMATION SERVICE INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION NEWS 03 OITA INFORMATION SERVICE INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION 04 05 NEWS OITA INFORMATION SERVICE
More informationNL2
Aug. 2001 ISSN 1346-6992 1234567890123456789012345678901212345678901234567890123456789012123456789012345678901234567890121234 1234567890123456789012345678901212345678901234567890123456789012123456789012345678901234567890121234
More information‚å„´561-2™ƒfi⁄
EU Social Inclusion Social Exclusion EU EU a EUCommunication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions-joint
More information社会システム研究21_ 畠山.indd
Dunning E-mailba042002@ed.ritsumei.ac.jp Dunning OLI Dunning OLI OLI FDIForeign Direct Investment Dunning OLI OLI ParadigmDunning OLI Ownership-Specific Advantages Location Specific Advantages Internationalization
More information160_cov.indd
2006 20202006 2006 1.13 19606 OECD 1.6 2004 20069.2 202214 111 1947Autumn 2007 No. 160 1. 19804.50 20052.90 21980 4.810.5200520.0 22.2 56 20.029.810.13.3 1 2002 70.7200663.4 2 3 2089.23040 63.265.7 2.
More informationネットワークコミュニティによる地域再生
14 2003 9 1 11 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 500 400 300 200 100 0 0 1980 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 2000 2 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,856 1,000 2.6 4,157 2.1 0 0 1983 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 2000 02 5.4 843 700
More informationuntitled
c Society5.0 Society5.0 Society5.0 Society5.0 2017 Society5.0 SDGs SIP PRISM Society5.0 2017 SIP ImPACT PRISM SDGs 1. Society5.0 2016 9 Society5.0 OR [1] Society5.0 2. Society5.0 2.1 Society5.0 Society5.0
More informationパネルディスカッション「図書館で広がるビジネス・チャンス」
UFJ 5 1 5 5 63 ( 1 4 2 64 2 65 3 64 65 1 4 66 1 64 3 10 IT 5 UFJ 1 000 3 250 IPO 600 100 6 100 6 1 71 65 4 4.1 1 000 1 000 1 000 997 997 1 2 1 2 1 1 3 1 7 70 997 3 4 20 1 S S C C C C 7 7 SOHO 7 230 12
More information金/金
IMF IMF M&A IMF IMF Gerchenkron Gerchenkron unbalanced growth Gerchenkron Johnson development state Hirschman IMF OECD IMF IMF GDP crony capitalism Krugman IMF capital market-based financial system bank-centered
More informationExcel IPO IPO
... 3... 4... 5... 7... 10... 10...11... 13... 15... 17... 19... 22... 24... 28... 29... 31... 37... 39... 40... 41... 43... 46... 48... 50... 52... 55... 58... 61... 66... 67... 67... 69... 71 1 /135
More information- 1 - - 2 - - 3 - - 4 - - 5 - - 6 - - 7 - - 8 - - 9 - - 10 - - 11 - - 12 - - 13 - - 14 - - 15 - - 16 - - 17 - - 18 - - 19 - - 20 - - 21 - 6 Qol Quality of Life - 22 - - 23 - - 24 - 7 8 9-25 - 10 Forest
More information新製品開発プロジェクトの評価手法
CIRJE-J-60 2001 8 A note on new product project selection model: Empirical analysis in chemical industry Kenichi KuwashimaUniversity of Tokyo Junichi TomitaUniversity of Tokyo August, 2001 Abstract By
More information225 225 232528 152810 225 232513 -1- -2- -3- -4- -5- -6- -7- -8- -9- -10- -11- -12- -13- -14- -15- -16- -17- -18- -19- -20- -21- -22- -23- -24- -25- -26- -27- -28- -29- -30- -31- -32- -33- -34- -35- -36-
More information232528 152810 232513 -1- -2- -3- -4- -5- -6- -7- -8- -9- -10- -11- -12- -13- -14- -15- -16- -17- -18- -19- -20- -21- -22- -23- -24- -25- -26- -27- -28- -29- -30- -31- -32- -33- -34- -35- -36- -37- -38-
More informationSB/2002/P1-66/8.14b (Page 1)
2 0 0 2 Sustainability Report 2002 http://www.itoyokado.iyg.co.jp C O N T E N T S P1 P2 P3 P5 P7 P9 P11 P13 P15 P17 P19 P20 P21 P27 P29 P31 P33 P35 P37 P38 P39 P41 P43 P45 P49 P51 P53 P55 P57 P59 P61 P63
More informationISSN ISBN C3033 The Institute for Economic Studies Seijo University , Seijo, Setagaya Tokyo , Japan
ISSN 2187 4182 ISBN 978 4 907635 09 1 C3033 The Institute for Economic Studies Seijo University 6 1 20, Seijo, Setagaya Tokyo 157-8511, Japan ISSN 2187 4182 ISBN 978 4 907635 09 1 C3033 The Institute
More information04-北沢.indd
フィールドレポート: 世 界 の 人 口 70 億 人 に いま 私 たちが 考 えること 行 動 すること 83 70 1 2011 10 31 70 1 1974 IPPF International Planned Parenthood Federation, 40 15 49 13 1987 50 12 1999 60 2011 70 Table 1 84 20 70 70 1 84 Replacement
More information第8期 情報化推進懇話会
J: 12.doc 02/04/17 1 1998 310 99 1,000 98 2000 2,000 2001 2,400 10 11 12 2,600 4,600 IMF!! 38 4,000 95 97 99 01 95 96 97 98 15 16 97 98 1,000 98 2,600 99 21 2000 52 2 98 2003 2003 (%) 99 23 2000 46 69
More information2漆原拓也.indd
3 1675 89 11 13 1 4 2 3 3 57 1742 67 2006:72 1985:77 1990 1999:287 1988:39 1956 3 1962 200 1975 300 2013 250 7 16 7 16 1 5 8 11 16 2004 9 NPO 4 1763 1748 74 1754 1763 1763 1934 1956:22 1996 2013 1987:51
More information2 / 24
2017 11 9 1 / 24 2 / 24 Solow, 1957 total factor productivity; TFP 5% 経済成長率の要因分解 4% 3% 2.68% 2.51% 2% 1% 0% 1.63% 1.50% 0.34% 0.42% 0.55% 0.97% 1.14% 0.86% 0.13% -0.59% -0.59% -0.09% 0.01% -1% 1970-80
More information: , , % ,299 9, , % ,
No. 22 March 2013 1. 1 2 3 4 2. 1 2 3. 1 2 2007 : 22 1980 51 1. 1 2008 : 170 4 5 2007 2007 2008 1 2008 6 2,592 205 2,900 0.33% 2009 7 6,299 9,300 238 2,600 0.31% 2010 254 1,700 2008 13.41 191.88 14 2010
More informationFINANCIAL FACT BOOK 2002 CONTENTS CONTENTS Sales Data Net Sales Sales Composition Sales by Region Profit Data Cost Composition & Operating Income/Net
FINANCIAL FACT BOOK 2002 FINANCIAL FACT BOOK 2002 CONTENTS CONTENTS Sales Data Net Sales Sales Composition Sales by Region Profit Data Cost Composition & Operating Income/Net Sales Gross Profit Margin
More informationuntitled
1959 TOC 2007 TOC CCPM) TOC OPT 1970 s 1980 s 1990 s 2000 s The New Economics NTT Input Output TOC (Theory Of Constraint) Focus =Not to do The Focusing Steps IDENTIFY the system s constraint(s). Decide
More information46
AP AP AP R&D AP 45 46 47 KHISS http://khiss.go.kr/khidi 48 GMS 49 GMS 50 AP R&D TV 51 personal sales 52 ASP Average Selling Price CM TV SNS VIP 53 Value - Conscious Consumer GMS 54 Melody Cream AP 55 AP
More informationPolicy Study No. 3 新 ビジネスモデルによる 日 本 企 業 の 強 さの 変 革 - 科 学 技 術 新 産 業 創 造 立 国 実 現 へのシナリオ - 1999 年 5 月 日 本 語 版 全 文 科 学 技 術 庁 科 学 技 術 政 策 研 究 所 第 1 研 究 グループ 前 田 昇 21 1 20 11 IT 11 12 IT 13 18 20 25 2 27 31
More information修士論文 doc
15 12 - 1 - - 2 - - 3 - - 4 - - 5 - - 6 - 10 11-7 - - 8 - 8-9 - - 10 - (1) - 12 - (2) 1995 15 16-13 - 1997 17 9 1997 18-14 - (3) - 15 - (4) - 16 - 19 29-17 - (5) - 18 - - 19 - - 20 - (1) - 21 - (2)
More information大谷女子大学紀要(よこ)49☆/4.横浜
NGO 1 NGONon-Governmental Organizations NGO 1997 NGO NGO NGO NGO 1 NGO NGO NGO 2 3 4 NGO NGO NGO NGO NGO NGO NGO NGO NGO NGO NGO NGO NGONGO 2 NGO NGO 19 NGO NGO NGO 2 120 NGO NGO 19 40 NGO 19 NGO NGO NGO
More informationSMBC Group Report 2018 CEO CEO SMBC Group Report 2018 1 SMBC 4 SMBC 6 7 ESG 10 SMBC 12 CEO 20 22 CFO 27 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 SMBC SMBC Group Report 2018 IIRC 2013 12 SMBC Group Report 2018 CSR 2017
More informationuntitled
The Collaboration and Coordination between Health and Welfare Organizations for the Social Service Innovation 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 5 1 6 7 2 8 9 10 11 12 2005 16 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 3 38 22 21 23 46 24
More informationTKTS 2
C 1 TKTS 2 Broadway League 1 42 nd Street Development Project MTV 3 2 4 (Theater District) ABC MTV Broadway League 3 (Theater District) 5 4 Broadway League 5 ( ) () 2009-10 $1,020 1189 39 2008-09 $943
More information1
1 2 Time Table Date Time Room A Room B Room C Room D Room A: (1F) Kaderu hall 8:45 Registration Room B: (4F) Main conference room 9:25-9:30 Opening Remarks (Room A) Room C: (10F) 1060 room 9:30-10:20 YL
More information文明no18.indb
No.18, 20131-16 27 1997 2000 1 60 1993 53 53 20 2000 12 4 4 4 1960 GDP 2627% 1960 50% GDP 50% 70% GDP 70% 30% 20 50% 55% 60% 4 3 2003 50% 11 111 15 1946 1969 23 46 60 15 15 1960 15 11 2 1960 4.2% 3% 5%
More information