04_田平正典.indd
|
|
|
- さなえ たかはし
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 GKS Becker and Fuest2003 GKS NEEDS Financial QUEST
2 62 1 Feldstein and Summers1979 Devereux and Griffith2003 Gordon, Kalambokidis and Slemrod2004 Becker and Fuest2003 King and Fullerton Gordon, Kalambokidis and Slemrod Gordon, Kalambokidis and Slemrod2004 GKS Becker and Fuest2003 GKS Devereux and Griffith King and Fullerton Becker and Fuest2003 GKS Becker and Fuest
3 63 1 Becker and Fuest2003 GKS Feldstein and Summers King and Fullerton19849p r 6 r EMTRpr p the pretax real rate of return 1 p 7 8 pr Ar p r A pr Ar 1 1r Ar 1 12 King and Fullerton1984 EMTRpr p 4 Feldstein and Summers % King and Fullerton1984p. 10 p. 19 A m w p p1a 1 s1mrw p
4 64 EMTR p r Ar p 1rAr (13) Gordon, Kalambokidis and Slemrod T E d t I t n1 1i n T E I t d 0 n,tn I tn dn T t E t K t EMTR 1rT t E t K t Sorensen T p K EATR EATRT t pk t T K T T t pk t K t T 14 tn I tn r K tn r tn K tn I t e rn 9 t t n t t n tm dm t K t T 0 I tne t n tmdm dn (15) t I t r K T t I 0 t e rdn dn r I t (16) A K t T AI t 14 T t pk t AI t T T t ArK t prk t 17 E E t prk t {pr}k t 18 9 Ruiz and Gerard200729rK t I t K t
5 65 TE T t E t ArK t GKS EMTR p r p T t E t K t 1rT t E t K t 110 T t pk t 17 EATR Ar pr p r1pr p p p r p pp p p p EMTR 1 p p 111 Devereux and Griffith (14) GKS Becker and Fuest2003 GKS GKS 10 Becker and Fuest2003 t1 I t1 K t1 t K t 1K t1 I t1 112 b i K B FK V V t 1bI t n1 1 n n1 ibk t B t I t 1i n n1 1i n {F tn K t1 K t1 } ib t 1i n Becker and Fuest200311Table 3.
6 I t V t I t 1b ib 1 n n11i n {F n11i n tn K t1 K t1 } I t K t1 {1K t I t } n11 n 1i n 1 i n1 i 1i n 1 V t I t 1 1 F i 115 F n1 F tn K t1 ) I t V t I t 0 F i d D V 11 V t 1bI t I t n11i I n t 1 n n11i n1 n11i n 1 n1 n1 1 n ibk t B t I t 1 ib t 1i n n11i n 1i n [F t n {1K t I t }1{1K t I t }D n ] 117 K t 1 {1K t I t } D D t n1 I tn 1 17 I t V t I t 1b 1 n n11i n n11i n1 n11i n 1 ib 1 n tn{1k n11i n n11i nf t I t } 1 I t 1b n11i 1 i n 1 n11i n 11Becker and Fuest (117) 3 I t
7 67 b1 1 i n1f tn{1k t I t } I t F n1f tn K t1 I t V t V t n11i 1 n i n11i b1 {F tn K t1 K t1 } n i I t { 1 1 i } n1 1i b ] 1 {F tn K t1 K t1 } n i 1 i{ i 1 i n n11i 1 b } 1 {F tn K t1 K t1 } i I t I t I t F 1 i 1 i { i 1 i n11i n 1 b } F1 i i F i { 1 1 d n i 1 n n11i 1 b } pf i i 1 A n1 1i n pi i Ai b i 12 i i. Becker and Fuest i1
8 68 pi {i Ai b} p 1i {i Ai b} 123 i i ) 13 pi A b p 1A b 124 Becker and Fuest2003 GKS T E T t { FK t ib t1 I t E t {FK t I t } T t E t {I t I t n11 ibk t1b n t1 } n11 ib t1ibk n t1 B t1 } r n1 1i n n1 1 n 24 I t 14 T t E t I t 1 n1 1i n I tib t1 ibk t1 B t Becker and Fuest r
9 T t E t 1 d {I n tib t1ibk t1b t1} n11i n I t I t 26 n1 1i n A 26 2 b T t E t I t {ib t1 ibk t1 B t1 }bi t I t Ab T t E t {I t ib t1 ibk t1 B t1 bi t } EMTR 1I t T t E t {I t ib t1 ibk t1 B t1 bi t } T t E t 1 EMTR { 1 n1 1 b } I n t 1I t { 1 n1 1 b } I n t Becker and Fuest2003 GKS 15 GKS Gordon, Kalambokidis and Slemrod Becker and Fuest20034 t K t r t I t I t K t 210 AA 15 Becker and Fuest
10 70 A 1 n n1 n01r r A 1 n n01 n1 AA AA r r r A r r MRR p pmrr 214 V r V 1MRR 0 1MRR e rt dt r 215 MRR MRR MRR r r MRR MRR MRRMRR r MRRpr 216 V V V 0 1MRRer t dt 1MRR r 217 r 1 A A C 1A C1A C C CC AA A r r0 r C V 217 C1A 1A 1MRR r MRR
11 71 MRR 1A r p p A r pa r 1 p p A r 1A r 221 MRR MRR A MRR MRRA r 222 tn I tn K tn t 16 K t T 0 I t e n dn 223 T t pk t K t T A MRR MRRK t 224 t T t T t pk t A K t A rk t {prr}k t A rk t rk t 225 pk t A rk t E t t E t {p}k t pk t 226 T t E t 16Sorensen Devereux
12 72 T t E t A rk t p p A r 1A r T t E t 1K t T t E t 228 r Gordon, Kalambokidis and Slemrod2004 r r Almeida and Paes2013 Gruevski Almeida and Paes2013Gruevski King and Fullerton1984 Almeida and Paes Gruevski Almeida and Paes INEINE BNDES 18 17Almeida and Paes Table 6. 18Almeida and Paes
13 Gruevski r (13) r Almeida and Paes2013 INE r GKS RF NEEDS GKS RF R R Becker and Fuest Becker and Fuest2003 GKS GKS GKS R NEEDS Financial QUEST 101, ,210,766 17,894, K t K t K t tax wedgetjlp Becker and Fuest
14 74 I t 21 r / R NEEDS Financial QUEST R
15 GKS 27 RF Becker and Fuest Becker and Fuest2003 GKS I t 29 2 pk t K K t t K t T t E t pk t K t the extra taxes due 30 T t E t T t E t 31 1 r % Becker and Fuest I i I 30Gordon, Kalambokidis and Slemrod r1z 31(228) p
16 76 2 K t K t T t E t T t E EMTR pk t t r ,537 17,757 14,937 20,437 8,739 3,442 12, ,657 15,620 16,537 25,842 7,602 3,027 10, ,753 11,600 17,472 11,197 6, , ,839 9,497 17,908 8,221 5,524 1,786 3, ,909 9,840 17,937 5,636 5,618 2,917 2, ,006 10,478 18,105 6,942 6,467 2,715 3, ,144 13,425 18,642 7,943 7,009 3,325 3, ,292 10,875 19,255 6,718 6,256 2,859 3, ,391 7,133 19,474 8,149 5,282 1,914 3, ,476 4,049 18,732 11,379 6,175 1,475 4, ,557 8,383 19,002 24,346 7,478 4,654 12, , ,979 4,185 5, , ,733 9,297 18,778 7,812 5,709 7,120 1, ,750 14,427 18,120 5,679 6,098 4,356 1, ,751 16,950 18,112 3,835 6,802 5,064 1, ,708 22,641 18,432 17,931 7, , ,698 23,116 17,941 11,315 8,408 3,666 4, ,449 23,987 18,230 2,472 8,025 6,396 1, ,319 6,894 17,125 9,520 4,786 8,580 3, ,175 9,629 16,395 5,240 4,152 3, ,044 13,430 15,605 3,427 4,535 4, ,948 12,696 14,813 5,266 4,220 3, ,895 13,975 14,083 12,036 4,939 1,109 3, ,818 25,613 13,554 15,211 6,211 4,394 1, NEEDS Financial QUEST T t E t TE E 32 2 EMTR r 33 pp. 1415
17 3R R , , ,887 8,691 8,695 19,137 5, , ,486 8,860 6,056 5,872 8,454 3,238 5, , , ,374 6,890 3,808 3, ,417 1,058 26, , , , ,429 1,692 23, , ,301 1,452 1, ,581 3,196 24, ,433 1,063 5,567 2,307 3, ,848 2,184 26, ,653 4,301 6,768 1,193 3, ,916 4,181 25, ,719 4,520 7,407 5,136 1, ,322 5,422 28, ,128 3,010 5,848 5, ,968 10,568 30, ,610 2,992 3,210 4,768 1, ,581 9,873 43, ,388 2,148 3,518 10,919 1, ,126 14,356 24, ,426 3,816 2,530 4, ,553 7,060 11, ,422 6,357 5,116 6, ,000 4,233 23, ,659 2,756 6,075 5,310 2, ,110 5,582 21, ,445 2,043 7,110 2, ,284 2,628 36, ,440 7,734 3, ,030 3,440 28, ,009 7,782 9,505 7, ,502 2,678 21, ,719 18,202 9,393 5,336 6, ,592 7,650 8, ,086 19,893 7,177 17,247 11, ,210 3,675 21, , ,744 2,347 3, ,338 5,579 18, ,881 3,699 4, , ,373 3,949 20, ,637 6,005 5,787 4,489 1, ,799 4,809 25, ,918 2,257 4,701 8,617 4, , , , ,584 2,529 7,612 R NEEDS Financial QUEST TE R R 2
18 R TE E TE 34 Becker and Fuest2003 GKS Feldstein and Summers King and Fullerton RF
19 79 r K F KF r z A F 1A r 11AA1Fr 1zr 1 A Az r 1zr 1 W r K FK A W t 0 e r t {FK t 11AI t }dt 1 H{FK t 11AI t }e r t I t K t 2 1 H I 1Aert 0 H K FK t K 1ert Ae r t r1ae r t e r t FK t K 1Ar 1 7 p pfk K p 1Ar 8 1
20 80 81 p 8 r pr Ar 1 9 Almeida, A. and N. Paes, 2013, The Influence of Interest on Net Equity and Interest Rates on Tax NeutralityA Case Study of the Brazilian Corporate Taxation, EconomiA, Vol. 14, No. 34, pp Becker, J. and C. Fuest, 2003, The GKS-Measure of the Effective Tax Burden on Investment: Theory and Empirical Evidence for Germany, Working Paper, University of Cologne. Devereux, M. 2004, Measuring Taxes on Income from Capital, in P. B. Sorensen (ed.), Measuring the Tax Burden on Capital and Labor, Chapter 2, pp. 3571, MIT Press. Devereux, M. and R. Griffith, 2003, Evaluating Tax Policy for Location Decisions, International Tax and Public Finance, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp Feldstein, M. and L. Summers, 1979, Inflation and the Taxation of Capital Income in the Corporate Sector, National Tax Journal, Vol. 32, No. 4, pp Gordon, R., L. Kalambokidis, and J. Slemrod, 2004, A New Summary Measure of the Effective Tax Rate on Investment, in P. B. Sorensen (ed.), Measuring the Tax Burden on Capital and Labor, Chapter 4, pp Gruevski, I. 2013, Effective Marginal Tax Rates on Corporate Income in Republic of Macedonia, Economic Development, No. 3, pp King, M. A. and D. Fullerton, 1984, The Taxation of Income from Capital: A Comparative Study of the United States, the United Kingdom, Sweden, and West Germany, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Ruiz, F. and M. Gerard, 2007, Summary, Description, and Extensions of the Capital Income Effective Tax Rate Literature, in C. Read and G. Gregoriu (eds.), International Taxation Handbook: Policy, Practice, Standards, and Regulation, Chapter 2, pp. 1141, CIMA Publishing. Sorensen, P. B. 2004, Measuring Taxes on Capital and Labor: An Overview of Methods and Issues, in P. B. Sorensen, (ed.), Measuring the Tax Burden on Capital and Labor, Chapter 1, pp. 134, MIT Press pp pp pp pp GKS 66 3 pp p p pp
21 81 1R NEEDS Financial QUEST / I_B01001 / I_B01007 / I_B01008 / I_B01002 / I_B01009 / I_B01024 / I_B01025 R / / / / I_B01019 I_B01020 / / I_B01018 (H01015) / I_B01027 / I_B01011 / I_B01029 / I_B01037 / / / / / / / / / I_B01003 I_B01004 I_B01005 I_B01010 I_B01068 I_B01069 I_B01030 I_B01002 I_B01009 I_B01008 / I_B01016
22 82 2 NEEDS Financial QUEST B01034 B01062 B D D D I_A / / / / / / / / / / / / / I_B01018 I_B01023 I_B01026 I_B01027 I_B01029 I_B01030 I_B01033 I_B01037 I_B01038 I_B01047 I_B01048 I_B01068 I_B H01005 RI_B01023I_B01026I_B01027I_B01029I_B01030I_B01037I_B01068I_ B01069I_B01048 I_B01047 I_B01038 I_B01033 I_B01027I_B01029I_B01030 I_B01033I_B01037I_B01068I_B01069
23 83 On the Estimate of Effective Marginal Corporate Tax Rate: An Examination of the Modified GKS Measure Masanori TAHIRA, Hideki SHIBUTANI Becker and Fuest2003 GKS GKS
2 1 2 1 2 3 3 1 2 3 4 4 VAT 5 2 1... 2 2... 25 1... 25 2... 57 3... 78 3... 89 1... 89 2... 116 3... 123 4... 142 4... 166 5... 183 1 2 3 税所得の圧縮を図ることもあり得る それに応じて法人税の支払いも少なくなる 法定税 率との乖離は こうした節税行為を含むかもしれない
Winter 図 1 図 OECD OECD OECD OECD 2003
266 Vol. 44 No. 3 I 序論 Mirrlees 1971 Diamond 1998 Saez 2002 Kaplow 2008 1 700 900 1, 300 1, 700 II III IV V II わが国の再分配の状況と国際比較 OECD Forster and Mira d Ercole 2005 2006 2001 Winter 08 267 図 1 図 2 2000 2
untitled
IV 1 IV 2 (i) 2 0.13 0.23 1 (i) 3 ( 0.11 0.19 0.5% 2 (ii) 1% (ii) 1,000, 1,000 (1 Q) G A 0.02 {e i ) 1} Q (e 5 1) 0.02 β Ρ (iii) 1 1 QG {e ig ( i G ) 1} QG (e 5 1) Ρ e in e i G n Q e in 1 e i G n 1 1 1
12056286_03.indd
: 82 1 2013 7 2010 2011 1 30 2010 30 2011 30 2010 9 10 11 2011 1 2 1 2010 9 UK UK UK UK UK p. 843 45 82 1 1 UK 9 9 2007-08 UK 30% 30 20%30 150 30 32.5% 2030% p. 843 3 2004-05 5% 5% 75% p. 843 2010 11 1963
税制改正にともなう家計の所得弾性値 : 高齢者パネルデータによる実証分析
Kwansei Gakuin University Rep Title Author(s) 税制改正にともなう家計の所得弾性値 : 高齢者パネルデータによる実証分析 Uemura, Toshiyuki, 上村, 敏之 ; Kitamura Takayuki, 金田, 陸幸 Citation 経済学論究, 69(4): 1-16 Issue Date 2016-3-20 URL http://hdl.handle.net/10236/14671
untitled
2 21 1984 50 3500 4200 1 3 1 1985 1984 1 2 1984 50 3 2 3 4 1 1989 35 3 4 5 22 3 1 19811984 19841987 1989 1981 1985 13 1984 1984 1986 1985 20 10 1987 10 2 36 1989 65 1989 1953 1985 60 1933 6.71% 43 3.15%53
p *2 DSGEDynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium New Keynesian *2 2
2013 1 nabe@ier.hit-u.ac.jp 2013 4 11 Jorgenson Tobin q : Hayashi s Theorem : Jordan : 1 investment 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 *1 *1 93SNA 1 p.180 1936 100 1970 *2 DSGEDynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium New Keynesian
Y-...W
259 21 1 1 2003 2 1 2 1 15 22 260 56 3 2 2. 1 2. 2 2. 3 2. 4 3 3. 1 3. 2 4 2 2. 1 1965 1999 2 Brick, Frierman, and Kim 1998 Choate 1997Fischer, Heinkel, and Zechner 1989 Gilson 1997 Mauer and Triantis
H1-H4_政経研究_51-3.ai
Employee-Choice Training and Company-Selection Training in Human Resource Development Eugenics and Social Policy Support of Income or Independent Life? :An Overview of Issues Surrounding Disability Pensions
Jorgenson F, L : L: Inada lim F =, lim F L = k L lim F =, lim F L = 2 L F >, F L > 3 F <, F LL < 4 λ >, λf, L = F λ, λl 5 Y = Const a L a < α < CES? C
27 nabe@ier.hit-u.ac.jp 27 4 3 Jorgenson Tobin q : Hayashi s Theorem Jordan Saddle Path. GDP % GDP 2. 3. 4.. Tobin q 2 2. Jorgenson F, L : L: Inada lim F =, lim F L = k L lim F =, lim F L = 2 L F >, F
戦間期日本企業の資金調達、資本コスト、資本構成：最適資本構成理論からみた1930年代における企業財務
1930 Modigliani and Miller [1958] 170 1930 2008 7 16 I E-mail: takashi.nanjou@boj.or.jp E-mail: cc00881@srv.cc.hit-u.ac.jp //2009.7 81 1. 1 2 M&A 3 4 1965 1969 1995 1995 1993 1 2008 2008 1985 2006 10 ROA
アジ研教科書「マクロ安定化」.PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Corbo, V., and S. Fischer, Structural Adjustment, Stabilization and Policy Reform: Domestic and International Finance, in J. Behrman and T. N. Srinivasan, eds., Handbook of Development
Ichiro KATO In the previous paper, The Tasks and Composition of the Public Fiscal 1 written by Ichiro Kato The Economic Journal of Taka
117 2 Ichiro KATO In the previous paper, The Tasks and Composition of the Public Fiscal 1 written by Ichiro Kato The Economic Journal of Takasaki City University of Economics44-4, the writer introduced
本文.indd
URL Web MAGAZINEPLUS CiNii JICPA http://www.kansai-u.ac.jp/library/home.htm, http://www.kansai-u.ac.jp/library/guide/bunken/bunken.html, DVD p.xxhicks, p.xx, p.xx, p.xx a, p.xxb, p.xx ab p.xx and Clark
IMES DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES Discussion Paper No. 99-J-17 INSTITUTE FOR MONETARY AND ECONOMIC STUDIES BANK OF JAPAN 100-8630 203 IMES Discussion Paper Series 99-J-17 1999 6 * JEL classification E52 E58
Ishi
Ishi HPhttp: // www.mof.go.jp / jouhou / syuzei / siryou /.htm.. or ERTA, TRA ERTA Economic Recovery Tax Act TRA Tax Reform Act Mroz Triest Lindsey Burtless Navrati Lindsey Burtless Navrati CPS Current
Auerbach and Kotlikoff(1987) (1987) (1988) 4 (2004) 5 Diamond(1965) Auerbach and Kotlikoff(1987) 1 ( ) ,
,, 2010 8 24 2010 9 14 A B C A (B Negishi(1960) (C) ( 22 3 27 ) E-mail:fujii@econ.kobe-u.ac.jp E-mail:082e527e@stu.kobe-u.ac.jp E-mail:iritani@econ.kobe-u.ac.jp 1 1 1 2 3 Auerbach and Kotlikoff(1987) (1987)
わが国企業による資金調達方法の選択問題
* takeshi.shimatani@boj.or.jp ** kawai@ml.me.titech.ac.jp *** naohiko.baba@boj.or.jp No.05-J-3 2005 3 103-8660 30 No.05-J-3 2005 3 1990 * E-mailtakeshi.shimatani@boj.or.jp ** E-mailkawai@ml.me.titech.ac.jp
17 17 10 1 1 2776 1 2 1920 31% 38.2% 2 17 6 17 1 42 2 1 2
05m 1 17 17 10 1 1 2776 1 2 1920 31% 38.2% 2 17 6 17 1 42 2 1 2 3 1975 1960 (1997) (2000) (1997) 1.701 (2000) 0.793 (1997) 2 11 (1999) 16 (2004) (1997) 1 2.720 2.751 3 4 17 (2005) 17 (2005)10 1 1 2776
Microsoft Word - Šv”|“Å‘I.DOC
90 ª ª * E-mailshinobu.nakagawa@boj.or.jp i ii iii iv SNA 1 70 80 2 80 90 80 80 90 1 80 90 98 6 1 1 SNA 2 1 SNA 80 1SNA 1 19931998 1 2-190 1,2 2 2-2 2-3,4 3 2-5 4 2030 2-3 3 2-15 97 20 90 2-15 9198 1.
ú r(ú) t n [;t] [;t=n]; (t=n; 2t=n]; (2t=n; 3t=n];:::; ((nä 1)t=n;t] n t 1 (nä1)t=n e Är(t)=n (nä 2)t=n e Är(t)=n e Är((nÄ1)t=n)=n t e Är(t)=n e Är((n
![ú r(ú) t n [;t] [;t=n]; (t=n; 2t=n]; (2t=n; 3t=n];:::; ((nä 1)t=n;t] n t 1 (nä1)t=n e Är(t)=n (nä 2)t=n e Är(t)=n e Är((nÄ1)t=n)=n t e Är(t)=n e Är((n](/thumbs/91/105121387.jpg "ú r(ú) t n [;t] [;t=n]; (t=n; 2t=n]; (2t=n; 3t=n];:::; ((nä 1)t=n;t] n t 1 (nä1)t=n e Är(t)=n (nä 2)t=n e Är(t)=n e Är((nÄ1)t=n)=n t e Är(t)=n e Är((n")
1 1.1 ( ) ö t 1 (1 +ö) Ä1 2 (1 +ö=2) Ä2 ö=2 n (1 +ö=n) Än n t (1 +ö=n) Änt t nt n t lim (1 n!1 +ö=n)änt = n!1 lim 2 4 1 + 1 n=ö! n=ö 3 5 Äöt = î lim s!1 í 1 + 1 ì s ï Äöt =e Äöt s e eëlim s!1 (1 + 1=s)
paper01.PDF
(1) (1) (2) (2) (3) (3) (4) * () (1996 12 1 2 3 [1994] B S B=S W D L (a) (b) B B=S = ( ) S D D Modigliani=Miller Ross and Westerfield [1988] Sharpe [1976] Treynor [1977] (a) V F F (b) F (c) (d) V F 4 L
02M3052 1 1.1 1.2 1.3 2 2.1 2.2 2.3 3 3.1 3.2-1- 1949 1 1987 1987 1996 1994 1997 1980 1980 2 3 1 3 1 1 22006 31980 1989 1997 3 1 2 2-2- 4 5 6 41979 2003 1998 300 1500 300 1500 5 1 3 6 3-3- 3 1979 2003
Public Pension and Immigration The Effects of Immigration on Welfare Inequality The immigration of unskilled workers has been analyzed by a considerab
Public Pension and Immigration The Effects of Immigration on Welfare Inequality The immigration of unskilled workers has been analyzed by a considerable amount of research, which has noted an ability distribution.
untitled
[ 研究ノート ] 4% 19 19 20 1997a 20 Mitchell, 2002: 123 208 1997b; 2008 2 1960 1980 Abdel-Fadil, 1975; Hansen, 1969; Radwan & Lee, 1986 Abdel-Fadil, 1980; 85 Assaad, 1997 2 Hopkins Hopkins & Westergaard, 1998:
No.9 3 4 4 5 6 9 9 13 15 15 17 21 23 27 31 2 1990 95 3 1 1 65 1 50 50 1 (2000) 4 1989 2 20% 26% 90 1 2 89 12 5 95 3 94 96 98 99 5 4 50 4 1 3 5 700 1,200 40 1,000 2 87 70% 15 60% 12 89 50% 5 3 95 1 4 90
物価指数の計測誤差と品質調整手法：わが国CPIからの教訓
CPICPI CPI CPI CPI CPI Economic Perspective Shiratsukaa Consumer Price IndexCPI CPI CPI CPI CPI Advisory Commission to Study the Consumer Price Index 1996Shiratsuka 1999bHoffmann 1998Cunningham 1996 Crawford
時間割引：双曲割引と弱加法性
Discussion aper No. 666 June 2006 The Institute of Social and Economic Research Osaka University 6-1 Mihogaoka, Ibaraki, Osaka 567-0047, Japan Time Discounting: Declining Impatience and Interval Effect
K
2015.2.27 1 1 OECD 1 1 2 50 53.6 K. 21 2010 6 18 7 2009 20.121.3 5.2 7.0 53.626.0 0.3 18.41.6 http://www.tse.or.jp/market/data/examination/distribute/b7gje6000001we32-att/report2009.p df 2014 10 21 2 50
24,828,330 Contents 9,931,332 8,223,840 3,436,978 9,931,332 7,674,406 3,413,724 2,985,287 1
24,828,330 Contents 9,931,332 8,223,840 3,436,978 9,931,332 7,674,406 3,413,724 2,985,287 1 2 3 1Chapter 138 4 5 Case Study 1 Case Study 2 6 Case Study 4 7 Case Study 3 9 Case Study 6 Case Study 5 8 10
自殺の経済社会的要因に関する調査研究報告書
17 1 2 3 4 5 11 16 30,247 17 18 21,024 +2.0 6 12 13 WHO 100 14 7 15 2 5 8 16 9 10 17 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 II I 18 Durkheim(1897) Hamermesh&Soss(1974)Dixit&Pindyck(1994) Becker&Posner(2004) Rosenthal(1993)
デフレ不況下の金融政策をめぐる政治過程
1991 2003 GDP....................................... http://www.stat.go.jp/ http://www.boj.or.jp/ GDP http://www.esri.cao.go.jp/ GDP - - - inflation targeting Krugman a IS-LM liquidity trap Krugman b Krugman
No.42 2010.9 30 4 EITC, Earned Income Tax Credit WTC, Working Tax Credit; CTC, Child Tax Credit GSTC, Goods and Services Tax Credit 3 5 2006 a2006 b 2
1 16 2 3 2008 4 4 in work tax credit welfare to work ALMPs 1990 *1965 1988 1994 1988 2003 2007 2007 2009 35 2009 1 20 2 21 1 21 3 No.42 2010.9 30 4 EITC, Earned Income Tax Credit WTC, Working Tax Credit;
Dill,, pp. - - EU i - - i - - - COE - COE COE COE Good Practice GP GP GP GP JABEE INQAAHE PDCA Plan-Do-Check-Action - FD FD - - Rice,, p. niche - i - -Jones,, pp. - MCAT - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
% 1% 37% 1 2
. 1. 2. 3. 3-1 3-2 3-3 3-4. 1. 2. 3. 4.. 1. 2. 3. 4.. 1. 2. 3.FORTRAN -1- 1 2002 2 2002-2- 2002 690 10% 1% 37% 1 2 20% -3- 1. 2. 3. 4. -4- 2002 1 24 1949 5 9 5 74% 50% -5- 1. 1 16 23 1 2001 25 1992 3 3
46−ª3�=4�“ƒ‚S“·‚Ö‡¦
463420101 1. 1989, Yoshida and Rasche1990, Rasche1990, 19921997, Fujiki and Mulligan1996, 1996, Sekine1998, 2001, Fujiki2002, 2003, 2004 Bahmani-Oskooee and Shabsigh1996, Amano and Wirjanto2000, Bahmani-Oskooee
ワールド・ワイド １０‐２（Ｐ）／３．中尾
28 1 35 35 1 2003 35 2 3 4 29 1965 1998 35 1000 5 647 1960 6 35 7 8 2 30 10 2 2. 1 2. 2 2. 3 3 3. 1 3. 2 4 2 2 2. 1 9 1 2003 1 647 10 t π macro 1 1964 1998 31 t- π macro 7.21 0.12 t 31.3610.65 R 2 0.77
Title ベンチャー企業の研究開発支出の決定要因 日本と台湾の事例を中心に Author(s) 蘇, 顯揚 Citation 經濟論叢 (1996), 158(1): Issue Date URL Right
Title ベンチャー企業の研究開発支出の決定要因 日本と台湾の事例を中心に Author(s) 蘇, 顯揚 Citation 經濟論叢 (1996), 158(1): 54-76 Issue Date 1996-07 URL https://doi.org/10.14989/45083 Right Type Departmental Bulletin Paper Textversion publisher
産業・企業レベルデータで見た日本の経済成長.pdf
2003 11 10 IT IT JIP JCER ) 2003 CD-ROM http://www.esri.go.jp/jp/archive/bun/bun170/170index. html 1 JIP Jorgenson, Mun, andstiroh (2002) GDP 2 3 1951 1954 1957 1960 1963 1966 1969 1972 1975 1978 1981
8’¼‹ä127-141
- H.B. Lary Ilse Mintz - - - - - - - Aaa. %. % Baa. %. % Baa - Chase National Bank H. C. Taylor. % Annual Report of Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.(1933) 231 q Moody s - Aaa Aa A Baa.....
6) 7) MBO management buy-out 2 necessity sufficiency ) 21
1) 1997 15 02 03 751 1998 8 9 04 1996 16.1% 17.5% 26.9% 64.9% 63.3% 48.9% 2) 02 54.8% 59.0% 61.8% 78.6% 46.5% 1996 17.8% 19.9% 18.7% 42% 11.9% 3) 4) 01 3 1 3 2 03 04 1 TCL 5) Vol. 52, No. 4, October 06
Powered by TCPDF ( Title 金利現実化措置以後の韓国における企業金融 : 年 Sub Title Korean corporate finance between 1965 and 1971 Author 李, 明輝 (Lee,
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org) Title 金利現実化措置以後の韓国における企業金融 : 1965 1971 年 Sub Title Korean corporate finance between 1965 and 1971 Author 李, 明輝 (Lee, Myunghwi) Publisher 慶應義塾経済学会 Publication year 2016
Public Investment, the Rate of Return, and Optimal Fiscal Policy Economic Growth Pioneering Economic Theory Mathematical Theories of Economic Growth Review of Economic Studiesvol.27 Econometrica vol.34
ＧＤＰギャップと潜在成長率
2003 output gap 80 1 20 90 20 70 2 1 2 output gap potential output 1 2 (2001) 3 potential rate of growth 2000 Meyer (2000) European Central Bank: (1999b) 2002 10 4 3 (2000) 4 4 () 5 5 5 6 () () 7 Total
2 3 4 II. 8 10 12 14 20 8 6,000 3,695 61.6 10 6,000 3754 62.6 12 5,010 3,111 62.1 149,000558362.0 62% 4 2059 ++5 4 78.3 (2%) 2002 3 8 10,12 14 8
453200810 I. Dicks-Mireaux and King (1983)Hubbard (1985) Dicks-Mireaux and King (1983)Hubbard (1985)(1990)(2000) Attanasio and Brugiavini(2003), Attanasio and Rohwedder(2003) (unobservable) heterogeneity
Walter et al. 2009: 1 Helleiner 1994 Strange 1971: Gilpin 1987: -65 Strange b, 1998c,
54 2012 77 92 E. Yano Shuichi 2011 11 2008 40 19821997 1998 LTCM 2001 IT 2007 1970 International Political Economy Helleiner 1994 54 2012 Walter et al. 2009: 1 Helleiner 1994 Strange 1971: Gilpin 1987:
高校生の就職への数学II
II O Tped b L A TEX ε . II. 3. 4. 5. http://www.ocn.ne.jp/ oboetene/plan/ 7 9 i .......................................................................................... 3..3...............................
untitled
The theory of investment, effective demand, and effective supply MURASE Naoyuki 2008 GDP 90 1970 80 Leijonhufvud, A.xel(1968) IS-LM IS-LM (1936) 3 N Z N proceeds; N D N (1936) 7 (1952) 1936 f(n) (N) N
untitled
2 book conference 1990 2003 14 Repeated Cross-Section Data 1 M1,M2 M1 Sekine(1998) Repeated Cross-Section Data 1 1. (1989), Yoshida and Rasche(1990), Rasche(1990), 19921997, Fujiki and Mulligan(1996),
shuron.dvi
01M3065 1 4 1.1........................... 4 1.2........................ 5 1.3........................ 6 2 8 2.1.......................... 8 2.2....................... 9 3 13 3.1.............................
1 P2 P P3P4 P5P8 P9P10 P11 P12
1 P2 P14 2 3 4 5 1 P3P4 P5P8 P9P10 P11 P12 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 & 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1! 3 2 3! 4 4 3 5 6 I 7 8 P7 P7I P5 9 P5! 10 4!! 11 5 03-5220-8520
A Message From President 2
A Message From President 2 Top Information 3 Top Information 4 A View Point 5 Annual Report 2 Financial Highlight 7, 5, 12, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 4, 3, 2, 1, 1, 8, 6, 4, 2, 6 5, 2, 8 4, 1,5 6 3, 2, 1, 1, 5
292 Vol. 44 No refundable tax credit Mirrlees 1971 Friedman
Winter 08 291 I はじめに Shinozaki 2005 2006 OECD United Nations 2007 OECD 2008 2 1 2006 2005 2 2006 refundable tax credit 2006 292 Vol. 44 No. 3 3 1 2 refundable tax credit 3 10 5 5 10 5 2 1 Mirrlees 1971
PFI
PFI 23 3 3 PFI PFI 1 1 2 3 2.1................................. 3 2.2..................... 4 2.3.......................... 5 3 7 3.1................................ 7 3.2.................................
The Effects of Tax Revenue by Deductions of National Income Tax and Individual Inhabitants Tax The national income tax and individual inhabitants tax
The Effects of Tax Revenue by Deductions of National Income Tax and Individual Inhabitants Tax The national income tax and individual inhabitants tax have similar deduction systems, but their respective
公務員倫理問題への新アプローチ
OECD CPI CPI CPI CPI CPI CPI / GDP / / / /.............................. Transparency International Corruption Perception Index CPI CPI 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
Masanori Hashimoto Rene Fahr and Hilmar Schneider 1. Hashimoto, Masanori Fahr, Rene and Hilmar Schneider Hashimoto, Masanori 2004 Fahr
17 6 22 Masanori Hashimoto Rene Fahr and Hilmar Schneider 1. Hashimoto, Masanori Fahr, Rene and Hilmar Schneider 2. 2004 Hashimoto, Masanori 2004 Fahr, Rene and Hilmar Schneider 2004-1 - Fahr and Schneider2004
2-栗原.TXT
NAOSITE: Nagasaki University's Ac Title カジノ税に関する一考察 Author(s) 栗原, 克文 Citation 經營と經濟, vol.89(1), pp.17-34; 2009 Issue Date 2009-06 URL http://hdl.handle.net/10069/23392 Right This document is downloaded
Graduate School of Policy and Management, Doshisha University 53 動学的資本税協調と公的資本形成 あらまし Zodrow and Mieszkowski 1986 Wilson 1986 Batina はじめに Zodr
Graduate School of Policy and Management, Doshisha University 53 動学的資本税協調と公的資本形成 あらまし Zodrow and Mieszkowski 1986 Wilson 1986 Batina 2009 1. はじめに Zodrow and Mieszkowski 1986 Wilson 1986 Tax Competition
表紙＿目次.PDF
JIL 2 1980 vol.3 15 3 1 3 15 18 IT 26 28 33 20 OECD 80 90 (1998) (2000) 2 Aghion et al. (1999) OECD 1970 1 2 70 1980 90 1.1 Kuznets U inverted U-shaped hypothesis GNP U 1 18901940 6 3 Kuznets(1955) (1963)
.y101211-4.z...Z.I.v24...ren
17 1 2007 2008 3 G D P GDP 564,606 5,158,515 10.9 375,538 1,420,657 26.6 21 350351 18 19 52.71 40.32 93.03 52.7 40.3 2009 38.9 2007 49.2 2009 12 1 15.9 10.8 7.7 13.7 6.8 13.9 4.8 6.1 3.7 5.8 2009 12 1
論文０８.indd
* 1 はじめに,, TOPIX TOPIX, TOPIX TOPIX Shelor Anderson and Cross C Japan Society of Monetary Economics 図 1 東日本大震災前後の株価 (TOPIX) の推移 1,000 950 900 850 800 750 700 図 2 阪神大震災前後の株価 (TOPIX) の推移 1,650 1,550 1,450
KBS MBC GATT SBS No
Kojima Hiroyuki 2014 7 4 12 2 SBS K-pop 2012 2 4000 1.8 1 412 2014 8 5 2013 10 11 17 Psy 3 2014 7 25 2014 1990 pop culture Korean Wave plowing model No. 635 2014 10 26 125 126 1990 2008 1990 1 1 1962 1
＜テーマ＞
1 2 3 4 1 2004 12 2 1261 8 (2004) 3 ( ) 1261 19 (2004) 4 5 6 1 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 13 14 15 2 16 1718 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 5 ( )15 (1988) () ( ) 95 208 (1991) 6 ( ) 374 2)(2002) 7 ( 8 )80 8 119 (1965)
4 2 p = p(t, g) (1) r = r(t, g) (2) p r t g p r dp dt = p dg t + p g (3) dt dr dt = r dg t + r g dt 3 p t p g dt p t 3 2 4 r t = 3 4 2 Benefit view dp
( ) 62 1 1 47 2 3 47 2 e-mail:miyazaki@ngu.ac.jp 1 2000 2005 1 4 2 p = p(t, g) (1) r = r(t, g) (2) p r t g p r dp dt = p dg t + p g (3) dt dr dt = r dg t + r g dt 3 p t p g dt p t 3 2 4 r t = 3 4 2 Benefit
OSIPPニュースレター.indd
Osaka School of International Public Policy OSIPP NEWSLETTER Vol.60 Spring 2012 OSIPP NEWSLETTER vol.60 01 02 OSIPP NEWSLETTER vol.60 OSIPP NEWSLETTER vol.60 03 04 OSIPP NEWSLETTER vol.60 The basic economics
IMES DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES Discussion Paper No. 99-J- 9 -J-19 INSTITUTE FOR MONETARY AND ECONOMIC STUDIES BANK OF JAPAN
IMES DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES Discussion Paper No. 99-J- 9 -J-19 INSTITUTE FOR MONETARY AND ECONOMIC STUDIES BANK OF JAPAN 100-8630 03 IMES Discussion Paper Series 99-J- 9 -J-19 1999 6 * * [1999] *(E-mail:
Value Added Tax VAT Mirrlees, J. VAT The Mirrlees Review The Structure and Reform of Direct Taxation Report of a Committee chaired by Professor J. E. Meade Dimensions of Tax Design Mirrlees 2010 Tax by
野村資本市場研究所｜日本の高度経済成長を支えた財政投融資の意義と教訓－アジアで応用する場合のヒント－（PDF）
2013 Summer 1. 2. 3. 4. 1 2013 Summer 1 2 2 1 2010 2020 11 8 2 7,260 300 2007 7,000 3 1 25.0% 20.0% 15.0% 10.0% 5.0% 0.0% -5.0% -10.0% 1953 1965 1980 1995 2004 2007 2010 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10
A5 PDF.pwd
ISA UK and Ireland 320 FRC 2009a materiality para. 2 International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board: IAASB International Standards on Auditing: ISA 320 International Accounting Standards Board: IASB
Financial Reporting Standard 17 FRS17 FAS87 87 Financial Accounting Standard 87 FAS87 International Accounting Standard Board IASB 19 Internat
No,25-36(2005) Two Changes in Accounting Principles of Pension Plans British, or Americanthat is the question Masaharu Usuki Nihon University, Graduate School of Social and Cultural School, and NLI Research
小塚匡文.indd
流通科学大学論集 - 経済 情報 政策編 - 第 22 巻第 2 号,19-32(2014) Lending Behavior for Small-Medium Business by Shinkin Bank and Other Domestic Bank in Japan: Evidences from Time Series Data Masafumi Kozuka I. 2006 99.7
Winter 2009 No Lower Earnings Limit
特集 : イギリスの社会保障 - ニューレイバーの 10 年 イギリスの公的 私的年金制度改革 丸谷浩介 I 1 50 1997 II 1. 2 15 Winter 2009 No. 169 8 3 4 1999 1989 8 2. 4 1 2 1 1992 6 16 Lower Earnings Limit1 65 60 1 2 16 2.40 16 2 1 5 1 2 3. 6 1970 State
Title 最適年金の理論 Author(s) 藤井, 隆雄 ; 林, 史明 ; 入谷, 純 ; 小黒, 一正 Citation Issue Date Type Technical Report Text Version publisher URL
Title 最適年金の理論 Author(s) 藤井, 隆雄 ; 林, 史明 ; 入谷, 純 ; 小黒, 一正 Citation Issue 2012-06 Date Type Technical Report Text Version publisher URL http://hdl.handle.net/10086/23085 Right Hitotsubashi University Repository
201/扉
Mohammad Reza SARKAR ARANI Associate Professor, Allameh Tabatabai University Visiting Research Scholar, International Research Center for Japanese Studies 200718 Mohammad Reza SARKAR ARANI Visiting Research
IFRS Business Model IASB 2010b, Purpose and status, a and b IASB IFRS IFRS IFRS IASB IFRS IFRS Principles-Based Standard Tweedie 2007 Tweedie 2007, p.
International Accounting Standards Board: IASB IASB 2010b IASB International Financial Reporting Standards: IFRS IFRS IFRS Tweedie 2007, p. 7 consistency AAAFASC 2011, p. 20 IFRS Business Model IASB 2010b,
福岡大学人文論叢47-3
679 pp. 1 680 2 681 pp. 3 682 4 683 5 684 pp. 6 685 7 686 8 687 9 688 pp. b 10 689 11 690 12 691 13 692 pp. 14 693 15 694 a b 16 695 a b 17 696 a 18 697 B 19 698 A B B B A B B A A 20 699 pp. 21 700 pp.
untitled
* 2001 (B) ** 113-0033 7-3-1 TEL(03)5841-5641FAX(03)5841-5521iwamoto@e.u-tokyo.ac.jp 1990 1990 1 2 3 1 (2002) 2 social infrastructure social capital Woolcook (1998) 3-1 - - 2 - 1990 Mera (1973) G Cobb-Douglas
_01野口.indd
: NPO 83 4 2015 3 1. 1998 NPO NPO NPO NPO NPO 2.NPO 1 NPO 2007 12 2011 4 NPO NPO 2011 3 11 NPO NPO NPO 1 1998 NPO NPO 2 2 NPO NPO NPO NPO 3 83 4 1NPO NPO NPO https://www.npo - homepage.go.jp/portalsite/syokatsutyobetsu_ninshou.html12
遺産相続、学歴及び退職金の決定要因に関する実証分析 『家族関係、就労、退職金及び教育・資産の世代間移転に関する世帯アンケート調査』
2-1. (2-1 ) (2-2 ) (2-3 ) (Hayashi [1986]Dekle [1989]Barthold and Ito [1992] [1996]Campbell [1997] [1998]Shimono and Ishikawa [2002]Shimono and Otsuki [2006] [2008]Horioka [2009]) 1 2-1-1 2-1-1-1 8 (1.
日本労働研究機構『ＩＴ活用企業についての実態調査』及び
March 200 1 1 15 29 49 5 59 2000 2007 2007 2007 5 2008 3 B 1 3 2005 20 44 2 1 2 3 1 2 3 2 4 2003 General Social Surveys 2003 5 5 20 49 2005 5 2 2008 3 31 2007 B 2007 2008 3 200418 49 50 2005 30 1990
濱田弘潤 : 多角化企業の利潤分析 77 多角化企業の利潤分析 多角化ディスカウントの寡占理論による説明 * 濱田弘潤 (diversification discount) Keywords: JEL classifications: D43, L13, L22, G
濱田弘潤 : 多角化企業の利潤分析 77 多角化企業の利潤分析 多角化ディスカウントの寡占理論による説明 * 濱田弘潤 (diversification discount) Keywords: JEL classifications: D43, L13, L22, G34 950-2181 2 8050 Tel. and fax: 025-262-6538 E-mail: khamada@econ.niigata-u.ac.jp
橡同居選択における所得の影響（DP原稿）.PDF
** *** * 2000 13 ** *** (1) (2) (1986) - 1 - - 2 - (1986) Ohtake (1991) (1993) (1994) (1996) (1997) (1997) Hayashi (1997) (1999) 60 Ohtake (1991) 86 (1996) 89 (1997) 92 (1999) 95 (1993) 86 89 74 79 (1986)
bc0710_010_015.indd
Case Study.01 Case Study.02 30 Case Study.05 Case Study.03 Case Study.04 Case Study.06 Case Study.07 Case Study.08 Case Study.21 Case Study.22 Case Study.24 Case Study.23 Case Study.25 Case Study.26
, FAD FAD FED FAO FAO WFP 1999 NGO ) 1. FAD FAD 1999 Lee, FAD % national coping s
20 30 280 350 1995 Devereux, 1988: 270 282 Food Availability Decline: FAD Food Entitlement Decline: FED FAD FAD FED 2000, 2002 FAD FAD FAD FED FAD Lee, 2003 FED 1999 59 2000 2000, 2001 2002 FAD FAD FED
商学 ６６‐１☆／１６．田口
251 1 2, 3 4, 5 2 1 2005 stakeholder agent p.13 2005 2009, 2011, 2012, 2013 b, 2014 Taguchi et al.2013 Aoki2001, 201019962010 2014 2013! 252 2 " " " " 6 " " " " 7 2! 3 p.5 2013 2011201120132012 Aoki20012004
49
\n Title カルドア勧告とは何だったのか - 企業 未分割家族 農 業所得の観点 - Author(s) 五嶋, 陽子, Gotoh, Yoko Citation 商経論叢, 49(1): 49-62 Date 2013-09-10 Type Departmental Bulletin Paper Rights publisher KANAGAWA University Repository
橡DP9802.PDF
21 Japan s Labor Force in the Year 2020 2020 2020 600 30 60 65 30 21 20 20 2020 2020 (1) 1 (2) (3) 1 1992 9 2025 2025 1997 1 2050 10 2050-1 - consensus estimate 21 (1995) (1997) (estimation) calibration
global imbalances ) * 1
global imbalances 2 3 45 6 1) * 1 68 53 Denison 1958 2 Denison 1958 Feldstein and Fane 1973 1946 1968 Feldstein 19731978 David and Scadding 1974Furstenberg 1981Pitelis 1987 Poterba 1986 1948 1986 Bhatia
... PC................................................... keio.jp... Web... Web........................ AV....................................................................................... 1 .....
An Empirical Study of the Securities Firms' Dilemma on Financial Innovation through Diffusion of Internet Deals Yasugi Satoshi Bower, J. L., 1999, Disruptive technologies: Catching the wave,
448 Vol. 44 No 図
Spring 09 447 概要 2004 1 2 I はじめに 19 2007 1. 34 2006 1. 32 90 1 90 Galor and Weil 1996 1996 1999 90 Sleebos 2003 Apps and Rees 2004 Martínez and Iza 2004 448 Vol. 44 No. 4 2. 20 2. 00 1. 80 1. 60 1. 40
_16_.indd
well-being well-being well-being Cantril Ladder well-being well-being Cantril Self-Anchoring Striving Scale Cantril Ladder Ladder Ladder awellbeing well-being well-being Gallup World Poll World Database
Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅳ Assertive community treatment - Issues from scientific and clinical literature with implications for practice The Impact of Supported Employment and Working on Clinical and
03.™ƒ−ÔŁñ“’
BIS BIS, Implications for Central Banks of the Development of Electronic Money, 1996. IC IC IC BC BA IC IC ATM ATM BIS POS IC IC ICICIC ECOM ECOM face-to-face IC Berger, A. N., D. Hancock, and J. C.
日本の教育経済学：実証分析の展望と課題.pdf
ESRI Discussion Paper Series No69 by October 2003 Economic and Social Research Institute Cabinet Office Tokyo, Japan 2 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 6 4 1 2 3 4 * 2003 8 7 B603 4 1 Schultz 1963 Becker 1964 human capital
OSIPP40_p1_2.eps
2006 年 秋号 No.40 1 2 Asia-Pacific Financial Markets Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies Studies on a Second Generation of Disequilibrium Economics International Economic Integration and