|
|
- つねとき さどひら
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Vol. 9 yasuhisa.toyosawa@mizuho-cb.co.jp 3 3
2
3 Altman968 Z Kaplan and Urwitz 979 Merton974 Support Vector Machine SVM
4 SVM i s i x b si t = b x i i r i R * R r (R,R, L,R ), R < R < L < R i 2 K 2 K s i a k Pr(r i = Rk ) = + exp( (s i + a )) + exp( (s k i + a k )) N(*) Pr( r i = Rk) = N(a k s i) N(a k s ) i i rˆ i = arg maxpr(r i = x) x Multi model 20Multi model 3
5 One model AIC SBCSchwarz One model EBITDA/ CF CF Debt/EBITDA EBITDA / / / 4
6 X: Log( ) Debt EBITDA EBITDA/ EBITDA = ( ) EBITDA EBITDA/ X 2 : X 3 : EBITDA EBITDA 2 X 4 : EBITDA X 5 : / X 6 : 3 5 NTT JR JT 2 Microsoft Excel Stdev 5
7 I * X7 : X8 : X9 : I I I {NTTJRJT} { } { } I * X0 : I { } AAAAA+BBB. 2. Accuracy RatioAR AR AR 6
8 Cumulative accuracy profilecap CAP X 30% Y 30% %, X 30% Y 00% 2 CAP X 30%Y 30% CAP X 30%Y 30% CAP Cumulative accuracy profiles %% AR A B 0 AR = B A + B Area Under CurveAUCAUC AR Engelmann and Tasche 2003 AR AUC 7
9 AR = 2AUC AR R k R k+ AR AR(R k,r k+ ) AR AAR K AAR = ( AR(R k= k,r k+ )) K AAR b AAR bˆ = arg max AAR( b) b 2009AR AUC Simulated annealing SA b f(r k,r k + c ) c i q i HR HR N = I N { f(rˆ, q ) } i i i = HR a HR aˆ = arg maxhr( a) a 3 Moody s Investors Service 8
10 SA a R&I 395 AAA AA+ AA AA- A+ A A- BBB+ BBB BBB- BB+ BB
11 AAA AAA BB+ BB 9 4,5,6 Log() / 2.0x 8 0.5x 4 0.0x AA+ AA A+ A A- BBB+ BBB BB* AA+ AA A+ A A- BBB+ BBB AA- BBB- AA- BBB- BB* 75 %th 25%th 2 BB*BB+ Pacific Data EBITDA/ EBITDA / 40% 0.30x 20% 0.5x 0% 0.00x AA+ AA A+ A A- BBB+ BBB BB* AA+ AA A+ A A- BBB+ BBB AA- BBB- AA- BBB- BB* 75 %th 25%th 2 BB*BB+ Pacific Data 0
12 / / 0.8x 2x 0x 0.4x 2x 0.0x 4x AA+ AA A+ A A- BBB+ BBB BB* AA+ AA A+ A A- BBB+ BBB AA- BBB- AA- BBB- BB* 75 %th 25%th 2 BB*BB+ Pacific Data AAR SA AAR 7 95% % 85% 0,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000 9,000 0,000 AAR % AR % AA AA- A+ A A- BBB+ BBB BBB AAR 93%
13 8 AR 87% X Log() X X2 / X7 NTT,JR,JT 4.8 X3 EBITDA/ X4 EBITDA/ 27.4 X5 / X8, 2 3. X X s = 7X + 4X 4X X + 2X X 9 27X 4 0X 3X X Multi model 88.9% 93.9% 00% 90% 93.9% 80% 70% 0,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000 9,000 0,000 2
14 90% % 4 > % > % AA+ AA AA- A+ A A- BBB+ BBB BBB- BB* > % BB*BB+ 2 AA+ BBB- 90% One model 4 20,000 5,000 5,000 76% 3
15 3,000,000,000,000,000 z XX4 0 = 7ΔX Δ 4 ΔX2 + 2 ΔX3 27 X4 X3EBITDA/ X4EBITDA / 0 = 7(Log(,000 +,000z) Log(,000)),000 +,000( z) 4( 3,000,000 ) 2, ΔX 27Δ 3 X Log( + z) + z = 2ΔX + 27Δ X 4 3 X4=+5% 5 5 EBITDA EBITDA / 4
16 X3= 5% 42%,000,420 % X4: EBITDA/ X EBITDA/ % 2%,000,20,000,790 3 One model 5
17 94% Altman, Edward L. 968, Financial Ratios, Discriminant Analysis and Prediction of Corporate Bankruptcy, The Journal of Finance, Vol.23, pp Engelmann, Bernd and D. Tasche 2003, Testing rating accuracy, CREDIT RISK, RISK JANUARY 2003, pp Gentle, James E. 2005, Random Number Generation and Monte Carlo Methods, Springer Hardle, Wolfgang, R. Moro and D. Schafer 2007, Estimating Probabilities of Default With Support Vector Machines, SFB 649 ECONOMIC RISK Kaplan, R. S. and G. Urwitz 979, Statistical model of bond ratings: A methodological inquiry, The Journal of Business, Vol.52, pp ,,, 20,,, Liu, Jon S. 2008, Monte Carlo Strategies in Scientific Computing, Springer Merton, Merton C. 974, On the Pricing of Corporate Debt: The Risk Structure of Interest Rates, The Journal of Business, Vol.29, pp
18 2009, AUC AR, FSA 5, pp ,, 50 2, 7
19 9 202 No Tel. (03)
20
大規模データベースを用いた信用リスク計測の問題点と対策(変数選択とデータ量の関係)
( ) CRD 450,000 86 2, CRD,, CRD 1 1 4 2 5 2.1........................................ 5 2.2............................... 6 3 2 7 3.1 2.................................... 7 3.2.............................
More informationBIS CDO CDO CDO CDO Cifuentes and O Connor[1] Finger[6] Li[8] Duffie and Garleânu[4] CDO Merton[9] CDO 1 CDO CDO CDS CDO three jump model Longstaff an
CDO 2010 5 18 CDO(Collateralized Debt Obligation) Duffie and Garleânu[4] CDO CDS(Credit Default Swap) Duffie and Garleânu[4] 4 CDO CDS CDO CDS CDO 2007 CDO CDO CDS 1 1.1 2007 2008 9 15 ( ) CDO CDO 80 E-mail:taiji.ohka@gmail.com
More informationIMES DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES Discussion Paper No. 99-J- 9 -J-19 INSTITUTE FOR MONETARY AND ECONOMIC STUDIES BANK OF JAPAN
IMES DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES Discussion Paper No. 99-J- 9 -J-19 INSTITUTE FOR MONETARY AND ECONOMIC STUDIES BANK OF JAPAN 100-8630 03 IMES Discussion Paper Series 99-J- 9 -J-19 1999 6 * * [1999] *(E-mail:
More informationtext.dvi
Abstract JP Morgan CreditMetrics (1) () (3) (4) 1 3 3 4 4 5 10 6 16 1 1 BIS 1 3 1 BIS 1 BIS 1 3 ALM (1) Value at Risk () (3) RAROC (Risk Ajusted Return On Capital) (4) 3 5 6 31 99% (= p ) ~x X Prf~x Xg
More information2004 10 2004 1984 2 1986 4 20 60 1 3 1 1 1 13,300 2 2 2 3 1 2004 2009 2 1 1 2 1 1985 97JR JT NTT 2002 96 97 4 JR JT 97 3 JR 19 29 JT 2.4 2.5 JR JT NTT JR JT NTT 2 97 4 JR 20.09 JT 19.92 NTT 17.35 17.35
More information200608094-101
94 A O D 1 A 1 A A 1 AO 1 95 A OA 1 a r A A 1 r A R 1 A R 1 A R 1 a a A OA R 1 96 F AO 1 A O 1 A 1 A O 1 A 1 O A 1 97 b O AO 1 O AO 1 A 1 A OA 1 AO 1 AA 1 98 A AO 1 A AO 1 b b 1 b b B B A 1 Q 1 rr 1 99
More informationCDOのプライシング・モデルとそれを用いたCDOの特性等の考察: CDOの商品性、国内市場の概説とともに
CDO CDO CDO CDO CDO CDO E-mail: kiyotaka_komiya@btm.co.jp CDOcollateralized debt obligation CDO CDO CDO CDO CDOCDO CDO CDO CDO CDOCDO CDO CDO CDO CDO CDO CDOABSasset backed securities CBOcollateralized
More informationuntitled
. x2.0 0.5 0 0.5.0 x 2 t= 0: : x α ij β j O x2 u I = α x j ij i i= 0 y j = + exp( u ) j v J = β y j= 0 j j o = + exp( v ) 0 0 e x p e x p J j I j ij i i o x β α = = = + +.. 2 3 8 x 75 58 28 36 x2 3 3 4
More information相互取引に伴う債権債務の依存構造を考慮した金融機関の与信評価について
IMES DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES 相互取引に伴う債権債務の依存構造を考慮した金融 機関の与信評価について にしでかつまさ 西出勝正 Discussion Paper No. 2015-J-6 INSTITUTE FOR MONETARY AND ECONOMIC STUDIES BANK OF JAPAN 日本銀行金融研究所 103-8660 東京都中央区日本橋本石町 2-1-1
More informationイントロ
2013 DISCLOSURE CONTENTS A W A B A N K 2 0 1 3 AWA BANK REPORT 2013 AWA BANK REPORT 2013 200 192 195 194 188 150 140 147 100 120 50 80 73 61 89 0 40 0 100 90 80 60 40 47 41 36 20 0 8,000 6,000 4,000
More informationカルマンフィルターによるベータ推定( )
β TOPIX 1 22 β β smoothness priors (the Capital Asset Pricing Model, CAPM) CAPM 1 β β β β smoothness priors :,,. E-mail: koiti@ism.ac.jp., 104 1 TOPIX β Z i = β i Z m + α i (1) Z i Z m α i α i β i (the
More informationuntitled
83 01 01 02 07 09 10 170,356 114,020 56,335 40,058 16,276 4,036 221 20,091 33 461 19,663 7,472 12,190 331 12,521 202,821 135,705 67,115 43,675 23,440 3,460 450 26,451 537 487 26,501 9,801 16,700 68
More informationA ,000 7,539 7,593
A+ 64 1 300 16 6,000 7,539 7,593 13 3,329 178 1,168 12% 11% 35 3 26 3 761.2 6 8,947 6,044 432 7,774 CONTENTS 01 02 04 07 11 20 38 6,677 6,706 6,044 5,519 5,489 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 866 796 522
More informationわが国企業による株主還元策の決定要因:配当・自社株消却のインセンティブを巡る実証分析
* youichi.ueno@boj.or.jp ** naohiko.baba@boj.or.jp No.05-J-6 2005 4 103-8660 30 No.05-J-6 2005 4 * ** 1990 1 2 1990 * E-mailyouichi.ueno@boj.or.jp ** E-mailnaohiko.baba@boj.or.jp 1 1990 1 1990 1 [2004]
More information繝励Μ繝ウ繝
2012. January vol.609 2 3 2012. January vol.609 4 5 2012. January vol.609 6 7 2012. January vol.609 8 9 2012. January vol.609 10 11 2012. January vol.609 12 13 2012. January vol.609 14 15 2012. January
More information01.Œk’ì/“²fi¡*
AIC AIC y n r n = logy n = logy n logy n ARCHEngle r n = σ n w n logσ n 2 = α + β w n 2 () r n = σ n w n logσ n 2 = α + β logσ n 2 + v n (2) w n r n logr n 2 = logσ n 2 + logw n 2 logσ n 2 = α +β logσ
More informationわが国企業による資金調達方法の選択問題
* takeshi.shimatani@boj.or.jp ** kawai@ml.me.titech.ac.jp *** naohiko.baba@boj.or.jp No.05-J-3 2005 3 103-8660 30 No.05-J-3 2005 3 1990 * E-mailtakeshi.shimatani@boj.or.jp ** E-mailkawai@ml.me.titech.ac.jp
More information21 1 2 1 2
21 1 2 1 2 1 2 3 ( ) 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 210 0.0 0.0 22 23 25 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 74 pp.4362003.10 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 141224 14 48 10
More informationuntitled
CDO 1. 100 1 1 1 1 2 11 2111 2005 0.5 2006 1 20.5%0.5 20.75% 1.0% 2007 3 1 11 1 4 1 1 1 1 3 1 4 6 1 8 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 3 4.273.800.47%47 5 5.25%4.101.15115 10 5.514.580.9393 7 2. 26510 1.5 100 20141220
More informationuntitled
IT IT 2014 B to B B to C 10 IT IT IT (CDS) Electronic Commerce, e-commerce B to B (Business to Business) B to C (Business to Consumer) C to C (Consumer to Consumer) O2O (Online to Offline) IT IT IT IT
More information() ( ) ( ) (1996) (1997) (1997) EaR (Earning at Risk) VaR ( ) ( ) Memmel (214) () 2 (214) 2
1 (Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, BCBS) (BCBS(24), BCBS(215) ) *1 ( ) ( (1997) (213a,b) ) 2 *1 (214) 1 () ( ) ( ) (1996) (1997) (1997) EaR (Earning at Risk) VaR 2 1 1 ( ) ( ) Memmel (214) () 2
More informationVol.171 2004.9.15 14 100 5 10 15 52 53 55 1 7 55 58 63 3 26 53 3 6 9 2 3 6 9 6 52 53 55 3 9 5 1 7 10 14 4 12 8 11
Vol.170 2004.9.9 9 17 9 17 1000 8 10 9 17 14:00 17:00 30 28 Vol.171 2004.9.15 14 100 5 10 15 52 53 55 1 7 55 58 63 3 26 53 3 6 9 2 3 6 9 6 52 53 55 3 9 5 1 7 10 14 4 12 8 11 9.17 10 15 38 51 53 55 6 2
More information2 A A 3 A 2. A [2] A A A A 4 [3]
1 2 A A 1. ([1]3 3[ ]) 2 A A 3 A 2. A [2] A A A A 4 [3] Xi 1 1 2 1 () () 1 n () 1 n 0 i i = 1 1 S = S +! X S ( ) 02 n 1 2 Xi 1 0 2 ( ) ( 2) n ( 2) n 0 i i = 1 2 S = S +! X 0 k Xip 1 (1-p) 1 ( ) n n k Pr
More information12„”‡Pfiú“ƒ-PDFŠp
5 Q Q Q Q ggg g f bbb -b b g b g g g a b f g r t y - 7 g bb f 6 E D f f f 2 2 2 2 2 f g f 2 f 2 f 2 g a g a b f a f g a a a - a f b a f b b b b bb bb E E E R Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q
More informationx T = (x 1,, x M ) x T x M K C 1,, C K 22 x w y 1: 2 2
Takio Kurita Neurosceince Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Indastrial Science and Technology takio-kurita@aistgojp (Support Vector Machine, SVM) 1 (Support Vector Machine, SVM) ( ) 2
More informationL Y L( ) Y0.15Y 0.03L 0.01L 6% L=(10.15)Y 108.5Y 6%1 Y y p L ( 19 ) [1990] [1988] 1
1. 1-1 00 001 9 J-REIT 1- MM CAPM 1-3 [001] [1997] [003] [001] [1999] [003] 1-4 0 . -1 18 1-1873 6 1896 L Y L( ) Y0.15Y 0.03L 0.01L 6% L=(10.15)Y 108.5Y 6%1 Y y p L 6 1986 ( 19 ) -3 17 3 18 44 1 [1990]
More informationMizuho Industry Focus Vol
2013 3 29 Vol. 126 itaru.kitahira@mizuho-cb.com kenichiro.kakizawa@mizuho-cb.co.jp 225 8 3 1 IR 2012 12 225 204 8 3 10 2 3 3 1 225 67% 63% 30% 31% 225204 20131159 DERDebt/EBITDADebt 37% 32% 24% 18% 18%
More information1 Nelson-Siegel Nelson and Siegel(1987) 3 Nelson-Siegel 3 Nelson-Siegel 2 3 Nelson-Siegel 2 Nelson-Siegel Litterman and Scheinkman(199
Nelson-Siegel Nelson-Siegel 1992 2007 15 1 Nelson and Siegel(1987) 2 FF VAR 1996 FF B) 1 Nelson-Siegel 15 90 1 Nelson and Siegel(1987) 3 Nelson-Siegel 3 Nelson-Siegel 2 3 Nelson-Siegel 2 Nelson-Siegel
More information03.Œk’ì
HRS KG NG-HRS NG-KG AIC Fama 1965 Mandelbrot Blattberg Gonedes t t Kariya, et. al. Nagahara ARCH EngleGARCH Bollerslev EGARCH Nelson GARCH Heynen, et. al. r n r n =σ n w n logσ n =α +βlogσ n 1 + v n w
More information本邦国債価格データを用いたゼロ・クーポン・イールド・カーブ推定手法の比較分析
Steeley [1991]... JAFEE 35 TMU NEEDS E-mail: kentarou.kikuchi@boj.or.jp / /212.7 35 1 1 1 1 2 McCulloch [1971, 1975] Steeley [1991] Tanggaard [1997] Schaefer [1981] Nelson and Siegel [1987] Svensson [1995]...
More informationuntitled
II(c) 1 October. 21, 2009 1 CS53 yamamoto@cs.kobe-u.ac.jp 3 1 7 1.1 : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 7 1.2 : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 8 1.2.1 : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 8 1.2.2
More informationJORSJ05-61_2_pdf.dvi
Transactions of the Operations Research Society of Japan 2007 50 42-67 2 ( 2005 9 26 ; 2006 10 9 ) 2 :,,,, 1. 2 1 Gordy & Heitfield [11] 1 2 2 1 42 43 2 3 4 5 6 5 7 2. Merton [18] Structural Zhou [27]
More informationエネルギー業界における競争優位の
16 2004 7 1 1 0.1 2000330 0.3 20044 500kW 7.0 2000 2004 2005 20054 50kW 17 2PPS 70,000 60,000 60,377 50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 35,434 32,733 19,347 16,048 12,204 6,893 6,759 6,604 0 PPS 1,640
More information18 2 20 W/C W/C W/C 4-4-1 0.05 1.0 1000 1. 1 1.1 1 1.2 3 2. 4 2.1 4 (1) 4 (2) 4 2.2 5 (1) 5 (2) 5 2.3 7 3. 8 3.1 8 3.2 ( ) 11 3.3 11 (1) 12 (2) 12 4. 14 4.1 14 4.2 14 (1) 15 (2) 16 (3) 17 4.3 17 5. 19
More informationuntitled
2010824 1 2 1031 5251020 101 3 0.04 % 2010.8.18 0.05 % 1 0.06 % 5 0.12 % 3 0.14 % 2010.8.16 5 0.42 % 2010.7.15 25 5 0.42 % 0.426% 2010.6.29 5 0.496 % 2010.8.12 4 0.85 % 2010.8.6 10 0.900 % 2010.8.18 2.340
More information上場変更と株価:株主分散と流動性変化のインパクト
Merton Amihud and Mendelson NASDAQ JASDAQ JASDAQ JASDAQ QUICK E-mailjuno@waseda.jp E-mailshibata-mai@c.metro-u.ac.jp E-mailtakeshi.shimatani@boj.or.jp E-mailtokiko.shimizu@boj.or.jp JASDAQ JASDAQ Merton
More information90 16.4 20.2 33.0 33.5 34.1 33.7 34.33 26.0 32.6 20.9 (28) (44) (55) (-39) (34) 847(48.3) 345(19.7) (37) (30) (42) (19) 96(5.5) 5) (25) 330(18.8) 137(7.8) 91 100% 90% 12.8% 12.5% 12% 69% 6.9% 9.1% 12.6%
More information財務情報
50 Financial Information >> 52 54 66 68 69 71 72 51 2004 4,625,151 2,605,343 2,019,807 N/A 373,435 139,401 234,034 (7,603) 2005 2006 2007 2008 2008 4,664,514 4,637,657 4,769,387 6,409,727 $ 63,976 2,650,586
More information瀬田唐橋景観検討について
3 3 12,174 /12hr 1,110 /12hr 3,066 /12hr 172.0m 51.75m 23.5+5@25.0+23.5m 3@17.25m 14.0m 15.0m 5 6 2009 12 3 2010 2 25 6/22 8/24 10/18 11/16 1/13 1797 16 15 15 13 6 (S49) 54 7 23-2 24 54 50
More informationOR2017_curlingRating.dvi
1998 (World Curling Federation, WCF) 1959 Scotch Cup (5 5) 5 WCF : 1. 1998 (World Curling Federation, WCF) 1959 2 Scotch Cup[8] (5 5) 5 WCF ( ) ( ) 1 2. 1 1: Major international competitons of curling
More informationResearch on decision making in multi-player games with imperfect information
Research on decision making in multi-player games with imperfect information 37-086521 22 2 9 UCT UCT 46 % 60000 9 % 1 1 1.1........................................ 1 1.2.....................................
More informationuntitled
18 12 10 40 H5N1 2005 11 WHO 2005 12 2006 6 (H5N1) 10 25 1,700 ( 1,300 2,500 ) 200 53 64 17 30% 3,785,000 291,200 3 14,100 4 30% 57,600 4,430 3 1,150 320 210 4 2% 0.56% () ) 1 10 2 3A (2B) 3B 4A5A 6A 4B
More informationCP BBB A 3 1
CP BBB A 3 1 ...1...2...3...4... 4... 7... 7... 10... 13...15... 15... 15... 19... 23... 31... 31... 32... 34... 34... 34...37... 37... 37... 38...40...41...42 2 1 2 1 2 1990 2001 2002 3 3 (%) 1970 1980
More informationuntitled
Discussion Paper Series No. J98 2008 9 2008 9 1919 1 1938 12 1928 1 1936 4 1 10 1931 1932 2008 19530274 1. 2 1930 5 1 1931 6 12 1936 11 2 1 1919 1 1938 12 1963 1927 1 1936 4 1 2 3 4 7 10 1927 1 1936 4
More information1 企業評価とは何か 格付け (Credit Rating) を視野に入れて Valuation Valuation valuation AAA DCF Discounted Cash Flow Wealth DCF 49
1 企業評価とは何か 格付け (Credit Rating) を視野に入れて Valuation Valuation valuation AAA DCF Discounted Cash Flow Wealth DCF 49 DCF X t V Σ t V X James E. Walters V D E R a R c E R a R c V E D R c R c R a R c R a R c
More information2 36 41 41 42 44 44 1 2 16 17 18 19 20 25 26 27 28 29 4 4.12 32 4.2 4.2.1 36 4.2.2 41 4.2.3 41 4.2.4 42 4.3 4.3.1 44 4.3.2 44 31 1 32 33 < 2 x 1 x x 2 < x 1 x1x 2 x1x 2 34 36 4.2 (1) (4) (1)
More information1 1.1 Merton(1974) Black and Cox (1976) PD Probability of Default LGD Loss Given Default 1 EAD Exposure At Default II Merton (1974) Merton Merton Gesk
y z II 2 :,,,,. UFJ CRD y ed061001@ srv.cc.hit-u.ac.jp z yamasita@ ism.ac.jp 1 1 1.1 Merton(1974) Black and Cox (1976) PD Probability of Default LGD Loss Given Default 1 EAD Exposure At Default II Merton
More information43 2 PD DR Sommar and Shahnazarianka [19] Simons and Rolwes [17] GDP Figlewski, Frydman and Liang [7] GDP Bonfim [2] 3 Bhattacharjee et al. [1] 2002 [
Transactions of the Operations Research Society of Japan Vol. 55, 2012, pp. 42 65 c ( 2011 10 25 ; 2012 3 1 ) ( PD) ( DR) 2007 DR PD 54 PD DR 0.72% PD :,,,,, 1. 1 ( PD: Probability of Default) 10 ( DR:
More information信用リスクモデリング ケーススタディ
信用リスクモデリングケーススタディ The MathWorks Computational Finance Team 2011 The MathWorks, Inc. 1 Time Table Time Agenda 15:20 15:25 Introduction 15:25 15:50 決定木による格付モデル 15:50 16:00 休憩 16:00 16:15 遷移行列とデフォルト確率 16:15
More information1 1.1 Merton (1974) Black and Cox (1976) PD Probability of Default LGD Loss Given Default 1 EAD Exposure At Default II Merton (1974) Merton Merton Ges
II 2 :,,,,. CRD ed061001@srv.cc.hit-u.ac.jp yamasita@ism.ac.jp 1 1 1.1 Merton (1974) Black and Cox (1976) PD Probability of Default LGD Loss Given Default 1 EAD Exposure At Default II Merton (1974) Merton
More information& 3 3 ' ' (., (Pixel), (Light Intensity) (Random Variable). (Joint Probability). V., V = {,,, V }. i x i x = (x, x,, x V ) T. x i i (State Variable),
.... Deeping and Expansion of Large-Scale Random Fields and Probabilistic Image Processing Kazuyuki Tanaka The mathematical frameworks of probabilistic image processing are formulated by means of Markov
More informatione 7 d d - - a 7 a - 6 Inormation b a
9/ 2008. No32 5 E 6 e 7 d d - - a 7 a - 6 Inormation b a e c c c a - dd d e b 6 e 6 6 Inormation e 7 7 a a b A e c c d 6 e a a a a a-aa a- a dddd d e b d d d 7 c c c d a d e e e e b 6 d c c c c c b 6
More information春期講座 ~ 極限 1 1, 1 2, 1 3, 1 4,, 1 n, n n {a n } n a n α {a n } α {a n } α lim n an = α n a n α α {a n } {a n } {a n } 1. a n = 2 n {a n } 2, 4, 8, 16,
春期講座 ~ 極限 1 1, 1 2, 1 3, 1 4,, 1 n, n n {a n } n a n α {a n } α {a n } α lim an = α n a n α α {a n } {a n } {a n } 1. a n = 2 n {a n } 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, n a n {a n } {a n } 2. a n = 10n + 1 {a n } lim an
More information31 33
17 3 31 33 36 38 42 45 47 50 52 54 57 60 74 80 82 88 89 92 98 101 104 106 94 1 252 37 1 2 2 1 252 38 1 15 3 16 6 24 17 2 10 252 29 15 21 20 15 4 15 467,555 14 11 25 15 1 6 15 5 ( ) 41 2 634 640 1 5 252
More information広報さっぽろ 2016年8月号 厚別区
8/119/10 P 2016 8 11 12 P4 P6 P6 P7 13 P4 14 15 P8 16 P6 17 18 19 20 P4 21 P4 22 P7 23 P6 P7 24 25 26 P4 P4 P6 27 P4 P7 28 P6 29 30 P4 P5 31 P5 P6 2016 9 1 2 3 P4 4 P4 5 P5 6 7 8 P4 9 10 P4 1 b 2 b 3 b
More informationohpmain.dvi
fujisawa@ism.ac.jp 1 Contents 1. 2. 3. 4. γ- 2 1. 3 10 5.6, 5.7, 5.4, 5.5, 5.8, 5.5, 5.3, 5.6, 5.4, 5.2. 5.5 5.6 +5.7 +5.4 +5.5 +5.8 +5.5 +5.3 +5.6 +5.4 +5.2 =5.5. 10 outlier 5 5.6, 5.7, 5.4, 5.5, 5.8,
More informationIBM-Mode1 Q: A: cash money It is fine today 2
8. IBM Model-1 @NICT mutiyama@nict.go.jp 1 IBM-Mode1 Q: A: cash money It is fine today 2 e f a P (f, a e) â : â = arg max a P (f, a e) â P (f, a e) 3 θ P (f e, θ) θ f d = { f, e } L(θ d) = log f,e d P
More informationTo Our Shareholders 1
IR WINTER 2005 To Our Shareholders 1 NIPPON OIL CORPORATION 2 Feature 3 NIPPON OIL CORPORATION 4 Topics Topics 1 Topics 2 5 NIPPON OIL CORPORATION Topics 3 6 Financial Review 7 NIPPON OIL CORPORATION 8
More informationワークショップ「国際財務報告基準(IFRS)と企業行動:IFRSアドプションのインパクト」の模様
IMES DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES IFRS IFRS Discussion Paper No. 2010-J-25 INSTITUTE FOR MONETARY AND ECONOMIC STUDIES BANK OF JAPAN 103-8660 2-1-1 http://www.imes.boj.or.jp IMES Discussion Paper Series 2010-J-25
More informationPlural bookkeep using Exchange Algebra Yuji Onuki (University of tsukuba) Key Words:,,, 1 Deguchi(2004) 2 (1984) Staszkiewicz(2011) SNA n n r 1,1 < Na
Plural bookkeep using Exchange Algebra Yuji Onuki (University of tsukuba) Key Words:,,, 1 Deguchi(2004) 2 (1984) Staszkiewicz(2011) SNA n n r 1,1 < Name 1,1, > +r 1,2 < Name 1,2, > + + r 1,k1 < Name 1,k1,
More information<テーマ>
1 2 3 4 1 2004 12 2 1261 8 (2004) 3 ( ) 1261 19 (2004) 4 5 6 1 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 13 14 15 2 16 1718 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 5 ( )15 (1988) () ( ) 95 208 (1991) 6 ( ) 374 2)(2002) 7 ( 8 )80 8 119 (1965)
More informationVol. 3 No (Mar. 2010) An Option Valuation Model Based on an Asset Pricing Model Incorporating Investors Beliefs Kentaro Tanaka, 1 Koich
Vol. 3 No. 2 51 64 (Mar. 2010 1 1 1 An Option Valuation Model Based on an Asset Pricing Model Incorporating Investors Beliefs Kentaro Tanaka, 1 Koichi Miyazaki 1 and Koji Nishiki 1 Preceding researches
More information23_02.dvi
Vol. 2 No. 2 10 21 (Mar. 2009) 1 1 1 Effect of Overconfidencial Investor to Stock Market Behaviour Ryota Inaishi, 1 Fei Zhai 1 and Eisuke Kita 1 Recently, the behavioral finance theory has been interested
More informationX X X Y R Y R Y R MCAR MAR MNAR Figure 1: MCAR, MAR, MNAR Y R X 1.2 Missing At Random (MAR) MAR MCAR MCAR Y X X Y MCAR 2 1 R X Y Table 1 3 IQ MCAR Y I
(missing data analysis) - - 1/16/2011 (missing data, missing value) (list-wise deletion) (pair-wise deletion) (full information maximum likelihood method, FIML) (multiple imputation method) 1 missing completely
More information0226_ぱどMD表1-ol前
No. MEDIA DATA 0 B O O K 00-090-0 0 000900 000 00 00 00 0000 0900 000900 AREA MAP 0,000 0,000 0,000 0,000 00,000 0,000 0,000 0,000 0,000 0,000 0,000 0,000 0,000 0,000 0,000 0,000 0,000 0,000 00,000 0,000
More information和RIMNo.22高安氏.indd
NIEsGDP 1990 200436.1 22.365.1 80 GDP 4 RIM 2006 Vol.6 No.22 RIM 2006 Vol.6 No.22 5 NIEs GDP GDP GDP GDP 90 GDP 1951 80 81 90 90 90 2001 2003 GDP 80 90 2001 2002 GDP 87GDP 80 GDP GDP 6 RIM 2006 Vol.6 No.22
More informationuntitled
2015 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Non-life Insurance Business Life Insurance Business Oversea Business 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 23673.6% 61.3% 25 30.2% 599 2,64080.2% 1,853104.0% 26 751.7% 9780
More informationCW3_AX094D06.indd
Financial Times Financial Times International Herald Tribune Wall Street Journal Financial Times Accounting Horizons Accounting and Business Research Preliminary Views, Financial Instruments
More information(2004 ) 2 (A) (B) (C) 3 (1987) (1988) Shimono and Tachibanaki(1985) (2008) , % 2 (1999) (2005) 3 (2005) (2006) (2008)
,, 23 4 30 (i) (ii) (i) (ii) Negishi (1960) 2010 (2010) ( ) ( ) (2010) E-mail:fujii@econ.kobe-u.ac.jp E-mail:082e527e@stu.kobe-u.ac.jp E-mail:iritani@econ.kobe-u.ac.jp 1 1 16 (2004 ) 2 (A) (B) (C) 3 (1987)
More informationIS1-09 第 回画像センシングシンポジウム, 横浜,14 年 6 月 2 Hough Forest Hough Forest[6] Random Forest( [5]) Random Forest Hough Forest Hough Forest 2.1 Hough Forest 1 2.2
IS1-09 第 回画像センシングシンポジウム, 横浜,14 年 6 月 MI-Hough Forest () E-mail: ym@vision.cs.chubu.ac.jphf@cs.chubu.ac.jp Abstract Hough Forest Random Forest MI-Hough Forest Multiple Instance Learning Bag Hough Forest
More information, 1), 2) (Markov-Switching Vector Autoregression, MSVAR), 3) 3, ,, , TOPIX, , explosive. 2,.,,,.,, 1
2016 1 12 4 1 2016 1 12, 1), 2) (Markov-Switching Vector Autoregression, MSVAR), 3) 3, 1980 1990.,, 225 1986 4 1990 6, TOPIX,1986 5 1990 2, explosive. 2,.,,,.,, 1986 Q2 1990 Q2,,. :, explosive, recursiveadf,
More informationFR 34 316 13 303 54
FR 34 316 13 303 54 23 ( 1 14 ) ( 3 10 ) 8/4 8/ 100% 8 22 7 12 1 9 8 45 25 28 17 19 14 3/1 6/27 5000 8/4 12/2930 1 66 45 43 35 49 25 22 20 23 21 17 13 20 6 1 8 52 1 50 4 11 49 3/4/5 75 6/7/8 46 9/10/11
More information..,,,, , ( ) 3.,., 3.,., 500, 233.,, 3,,.,, i
25 Feature Selection for Prediction of Stock Price Time Series 1140357 2014 2 28 ..,,,,. 2013 1 1 12 31, ( ) 3.,., 3.,., 500, 233.,, 3,,.,, i Abstract Feature Selection for Prediction of Stock Price Time
More informationir資料4 2.ai
Outline of business Outline of business Outline of business Outline of business Achievement transition Achievement transition Achievement transition Achievement transition Achievement transition Profit
More information資産価値の長期記憶性を考慮したマートンモデルの拡張
資 産 価 値 の 長 期 記 憶 性 と マートンモデルの 拡 張 一 橋 大 学 大 学 院 経 済 学 研 究 科 吉 田 遼 太 朗 EM121022 2013/09/28 目 次 本 研 究 の 目 的 データ - 資 産 価 値 データの 生 成 変 換 - 特 徴 資 産 価 値 変 化 率 の 長 期 記 憶 性 - 自 己 相 関 関 数 R/S 統 計 量 ハースト 指 数 -
More informationa m 1 mod p a km 1 mod p k<s 1.6. n > 1 n 1= s m, (m, = 1 a n n a m 1 mod n a km 1 mod n k<sn a 1.7. n > 1 n 1= s m, (m, = 1 r n ν = min ord (p 1 (1 B
10 004 Journal of the Institute of Science and Engineering. Chuo University Euler n > 1 p n p ord p n n n 1= s m (m B psp = {a (Z/nZ ; a n 1 =1}, B epsp = { ( a (Z/nZ ; a n 1 a }, = n B spsp = { a (Z/nZ
More informationuntitled
N N X=[ ] R IJK R X R ABC A=[a ] R B=[b ] R C=[c ] R ABC X =[ ] R = a b c X X X X X D( ) D(X X )= log + D( ) a a b b c c b c b c a c a c a b a b R X X A a t =a b c a = t a R i i = a =. a I R = a = b =
More information山形大学紀要
x t IID t = b b x t t x t t = b t- AR ARMA IID AR ARMAMA TAR ARCHGARCH TARThreshold Auto Regressive Model TARTongTongLim y y X t y Self Exciting Threshold Auto Regressive, SETAR SETARTAR TsayGewekeTerui
More information(1)2004年度 日本地理
1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12-5.0-5.1-1.4 4.2 8.6 12.4 16.9 19.5 16.6 10.8 3.3-2.0 6.6 16.6 16.6 18.6 21.3 23.8 26.6 28.5 28.2 27.2 24.9 21.7 18.4 22.7 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 2.2 3.5 7.7 11.1
More informationTitle 最適年金の理論 Author(s) 藤井, 隆雄 ; 林, 史明 ; 入谷, 純 ; 小黒, 一正 Citation Issue Date Type Technical Report Text Version publisher URL
Title 最適年金の理論 Author(s) 藤井, 隆雄 ; 林, 史明 ; 入谷, 純 ; 小黒, 一正 Citation Issue 2012-06 Date Type Technical Report Text Version publisher URL http://hdl.handle.net/10086/23085 Right Hitotsubashi University Repository
More information研究シリーズ第40号
165 PEN WPI CPI WAGE IIP Feige and Pearce 166 167 168 169 Vector Autoregression n (z) z z p p p zt = φ1zt 1 + φ2zt 2 + + φ pzt p + t Cov( 0 ε t, ε t j )= Σ for for j 0 j = 0 Cov( ε t, zt j ) = 0 j = >
More informationわが国のレポ市場について―理論的整理と実証分析―
GCGC SC GCSC SC SC E-mail: yasunari.inamura@boj.or.jp E-mail: naohiko.baba@boj.or.jp GC general collateralscspecial collateral Griffiths and Winters GCFF Jordan and JordanDuffie matched book GC GC SC DuffieKrishnamurthy
More information