: (1) 1. ( ) P ( P ) 2. P () A0 = {a1, a2,..., an} 3a. T1 A0 () A1 3b. T1 A2 (= A1 A0 A1) 4a. T2 A2 ( ) 4b. A1 () 5. : T2 T1 T1 T2 T2 T1 T2 T1 T2 T1 T
|
|
|
- こうご さんきち
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Syntax for Dummies () ( ) ( ) ( )???! Lakoff, Langacker, Fauconnier : 1)? JARO (i) (ii) (ii) (i) 1) [3, 12] 1
2 : (1) 1. ( ) P ( P ) 2. P () A0 = {a1, a2,..., an} 3a. T1 A0 () A1 3b. T1 A2 (= A1 A0 A1) 4a. T2 A2 ( ) 4b. A1 () 5. : T2 T1 T1 T2 T2 T1 T2 T1 T2 T1 T2 A2 T1 irrelevant A ) (image schemas) X NP, VP 3) (arguments) (adjuncts) 1.2 () [1, 5, 6, 11, 14] [1, 5, 11, 14] ( ) ) NP, VP N, V 2) N, V 2
3 () (NP) (PP) NP 4) NP PP ) [9] NP?? : 1.2.4? 3
4 ?:? : (2) (syntactic phenomenon)?: (theory of syntax) X (3) (syntactic structure)?: X (4) (theory of syntax/ syntactic theory)?: X () M (e.g., [1, 14]) (4) (3) (2) 5) : (5) a. (2) (3) b. (3) (4) 5) [11] (2) (5) (3) (4) (2) (3) (4) (Universal Grammar) : (6) X X X X X X (7) a. b. c. {,,... } {,,,... } {,,,,,... } 4
5 2.2.1 (words) {,,,,,... } (morphemes) 6) {,,... } {,,,,... } ( ) (phrases) (7) (8) 7) (8) a. {,, } = {a 1, a 2, a 3 } b. {,,,,, } = {a 1, b 1, b 2, b 3, a 2, a 3 } c. {,,,,,,, } = {a 1, b 1, b 2, b 3, c 1, c 2, a 2, a 3 } = (segment(ation)) (8) (9) a. {,, } b. {,, } c. {,,,, } : (7) (8) (construct) 6) [10] 7) (8) (8b) (7b) (10) a. [=(7b)] = a 1 b 1 b 2 b 3 a 2 a 3 b. = a 1 b 2 b 1 b 3 a 2 a 3 c. * = a 1 b 3 b 2 b 1 a 2 a 3 d. * e.... = a 1 b 3 b 2 b 1 a 2 a 3 X (e.g., ) (e.g., ) (acceptable) 8) (*) *X (10c, d) (ungrammatical) 9) 10) (11) a. b. (locality) (12) 8) ( ) X / X (accept) / / 9) X ( ) () G X (= ) / 10) ( ) ( ) 5
6 (13)? a 1, b 1, c 1 2 () 2.3 : (8) (syntactic analysis) Hockett (7b) 1 L[0] (8b) L[6]: L[5]: L[4]: L[3]: L[1]: L 0]: M 2]: M 1]: M 0]: 1 Hockett 1 Charles Hockett Hockett (Hockett s box) (Hockett ) ((Hockett s) box representation) 11) M[0]... L[6] M[i] (i = 0, 1, 2) (morphology) (word formation) L[i] (i = 0, 1,..., 6) ( ) (syntax)) 12) () 1 L[i] 2 2 () ((immediate) constituent analysis) 11) 12) [8] (ultimate constituents) = (terminals) (8) (bracketing) (14) (15) (14) a. [ X1 [ a1 ] [ X2 [ a2 ] [ a3 ]]] b. [ X1 [ a1 ] [ X2 [ X3 [ X4 [ b1 ] [ b2 ] [ b3 ]] [ a3 ]] [ a3 ]] c. [ X1 [ a1 ] [ X2 [ X3 [ X4 [ b1 ] [ b2 ] [ b3 ]] [ X5 [ X6 [ c1 ] [ c2 ]] [ a3 ]]] [ a3 ]] (15) a. [[] [[] []]] b. [[] [[[[] [ ] []] []] []] c. [[] [[[[] [ ] []] [[[ ] [ ]] []]] []] (14) { X 1,..., a 1,..., b 1,... } () 2 ( ) (16) a.? b.? ( ) 13) 13) [11] 6
7 1 Hockett 2 : Hockett Hockett 14) ( ) : (17) : ( ) Hockett [ ] [[][ ]] [[ ][ ]] [[ ][ ]] [[ ][ ]] (7b) Hockett Hockett : (18) 3 ( ) (bottomup) (topdown) (19) (14, 15) 3 1, 2 (14) [ ] [[ ] ] 2.5 (16a) (greedy constituency analysis) (7b) 3 [[ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][][ ]] 1 M[0] 14) Hockett (i) (ii) x 1... y... x 2 x 1... y y... x 2 (synchronize) x 1... x 2 x 1... x 2 (19) () : (20) 7
8 2.3.7 ( ) (word formation) = (morphology) (21) a. b. 15) (22) a. b. [ ] [] [] [ ] [] [] [ ] [] [] [ ] [] [] [] [ ] [] [] [] [ ] (21a) ([-gumi-]) (21b) [-kumi-in] [] ( 1) [] ( 2) 1 2 (23) : (24)???? 2.5 (labeling) VP (=S0) V' NP VP (=S1) VP (=S2) 4 NP: NP: AP: V: NP: V: 5 () 4 (morphological analysis) ( ) ) X (... X X... ) (21b) (22b) (21a) (22a) X : Y (e.g., NP:) Y (e.g., ) X (e.g., NP) ( ) (14b) L = { X 1,..., a 1,... } : (25) a. X 1, X 3, X 4 VP (= S ) b. X 2, b 1, a 3 NP c. b 2 AP 8
9 d. b 3, a 3 V 5 (26b) : (26) a. [ VP(=S0) [ NP ] [ V [ NP ] [ V ]]] b. [ VP(=S0) [ NP ] [ V [ NP [ VP(=S1) [ NP ] [ VP(=S2) ]] [ NP ]] [ V ]]] [ NP [ VP ][ NP ( )]] [ NP ( )] [ VP ] (modifier) [ NP ] [ VP ] (adjunction) (adjuncts) (adjoin) X Y X Y X :?? () (9) : A. (Verb: V) ( ) (Subject) {,, } ( ) (Object) B. (9) (grammatical functions) (grammatical roles) GF GR (27) GF = GR = { (subject), () ((direct) object), (indirect object), (modifier),... } GF (8), (9) (28) a. A = {{: Subject}, {: Object}, {: Predicate}} b. B = {{: Subject}, {: Object}, {: Predicate}} c. C = {{: Subject}, { : Object}, {: Predicate}} (29) a. B = {{:??}, { :??}, { :??}} b. C = {{:??}, {:??}, { : Modifier}, {: Object Predicate?}} (30) Verb (predicate) (argument) (realization) {Arg1, Arg2,... } Arg1 = (Subject), Arg2 = (Object),... 16) : (31) (32) (configuration) () Lexical-Functional Grammar [1] 2.4.3? (part of speech) ((syntactic) categories) () (syntactic (segmentational) units) (terminals) 16) Arg2 ( ) (accusative) I got off the bus { I: ARG1, GOT: PRED, MYSELF: ARG2, OFF THE BUS: ARG3} 9
10 = (nodes) X = XP (X Phrase) (head) X X (33) { Noun (N), Verb (V), Pre/Postpositional (P), Adjective (A), Advberb (Adv), Complementizer (C)} 17) 6 XP = X'' X' Specifier(X) X Complement(X) SVO () X XP = X'' X' (34) a. NP (Noun Phrase; ) N () b. VP (Verb Phrase; ) V () c. PP (Prepositional/ Postpositional Phrase; / ) P (/ ) d. AP (Adjective Phrase; ) A () e. AdvP (Adverb Phrase; ) Adv () f. CP (Complementizer Phrase; ) C (, e.g., that) X XP X X XP = X ( X) X (projection) X ( X) (complement) X (specifier) XP = X X (maximal projection) XP 6, () 6, 7 (phrase structure) 18) 17) X {Modal (M), Neg, Inflection (I), Tense (T), Determiner (D),... } () MP, NegP, IP, TP, DP,... ( ) [2] ) (rewrite rules): X Y Z ( ) X (Phrase) 7 Specifier(X) Complement(X) SOV () X (constituency structure) : (35) () X X = V = Predicate[n] {Arg1} {Arg2, Arg3,..., Argn} (external argument) (internal arguments) Arg X (arguments) (adjuncts) (specfier) (complements) 19) (modifiers) (26b) (26a) [ VP(=S0) [ NP ] [ V [ NP ] [ V ]]] 19) X 10
11 (26b) [ VP(=S0) [ NP ] [ V [ NP [ VP(=S1) [ NP ] [ VP(=S2) ]] [ NP ]] [ V ]]] X X SVO, SOV O, V VSO {S, {O, V}} VSO (Arabic, Celtic), OSV 20) (28) (36) a. A = {{: Subject: NP}, { { : Object: NP }, { : Predicate[2]: V}}: Predicate[1]: V } b. B = {{: Subject: NP}, { { : Object: NP }, { : Predicate[2]: V } }: Predicate[1]: V } : (37) (36) X Predicate[2], Predicate[1], Predicate[0] Predicate[n] n Predicate[0] = VP = S ( ) VP V, S V (= VP) (36) 8 : Predicate[0]: VP = S : Predicate[1]: V : Arg1 : Arg2 : Predicate[2]: V 8 VP := V S ( ) := VP 21) S := VP Generalized Phrase Structure 20) () ((syntactic) transformation) 21) [11] Grammar (GPSG) [4] Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar (HPSG) [13] IP TP S DP, TP, IP,... HPSG, LFG DP, TP, IP,... () ((syntactic) derivation) 2.5 RP XP (VP) V (= V ) S V (= V ) / /? X (38) a. Specifier ( )? b. Specifier ( )? VP PP X / SPEC X [7] / SPEC / /? [15] / NP NP? 11
12 S=V'' P'' V' NP P' V' S=V''=U'' NP P' P'' V'=U' NP P'' V'=U' A'' V" P'' P' V=U' V'=v' P' P' A' V=P' U=v' P' V=v' NP: P: NP: P: V?: A: P: V: P: U: v: NP: P: V: v: 9 XP Network Analysis XP (16a) (16b) 9 XP (XP Network Analysis) P, A [NP: ] [P: ], [V: ], [A: ], [P: ], [P : () ], [U: ( ) ], [P: ], [V: ] [NP: ] {N, {P, V, U, v}} (= {N, R}) R = {P, U, V, v} (39) [ R NP [ R Complement R ]] N P V U v {N, {P, V, U, v}} : N N, N = NP X NP-Specifier, NPcomplement P P, P X PP-Specifier NP, PPcomplement NP V V, V = S X VP-Specifier NP, VPcomplement (PP, AP, NP) U ( ) (auxiliary) V U, U = S X UP-Specifier NP, UPcomplement V v (inflection) P v = V, v = V X vp-specifier NP, vp-complement (stem) 22) 22) v, v, v (=vp) () 2 () ((syntactic) transformations) (e.g., [[][ ]], [[ ]... [ ]], [[ ]... []]) 9 XP 1: 2: PP-Spec : / (PP-Specifier) NP PRO (gap) : [ ] = (gap) g (40) (41a, b, c) ( ) (missing units) (40) [[][][ ][][]] (41) a. [[ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][]] b. [[ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][]] c. [[ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][]] (Minimalist Pogram) [2] (light verb) 12
13 (42) a.?*[[][][ ][ ][ ][]] b. *[[][][ ][][ ][]] 9 (i) (40) (41a, b, c) ( ) (ii) (42a, b) 2.6 (41b) kkuroda/ papers/ CogMorphFinalOriginal.pdf] [9] Kuroda, Sige-Yuki Generative Grammatical Studies in the Japanese Language. Garland. [Facsimilie of 1965 MIT Dissertation.] [10] Matthews, P. H Morphology. Cambridge University Press. [11] McCawley, James D Syntactic Phenomena of English, 2nd Edition. University of Chicago Press. [12] ?:.. [13] Sag, Ivan, and Carl J. Pollard Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar. CLSI Publications. [14] Sag, Ivan, Thomas Wasow, and Emily E. Bendler Syntactic Theory: A Formal Introduction. University of Chicago Press. [: : (, ). ( ). ( Bendler )] [15] Stowell, Timothy Origins of Phrase Structure. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. MIT. 3??? [1] Bresnan, Joan Lexical-Functional Syntax. Blackwell. [2] Chomsky, Noam The Minimalist Program. MIT Press. [3] :. :. [4] Gazdar, Gerald, Geoffrey Pullum, Evan Klein, and Ivan Sag Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar. Blackwell. [5] Green, Georgia, and Jerry Morgan A Practical Guide to Syntactic Analysis. University of Chicago Press. [6] [7] Jackendoff, Ray S X Syntax: A Study of Phrase Structure. MIT Press. [8] [ () [ 13
...C...{ ren
15 2010. 2 41 1 1 2 Ura 1999 1a 1b 1c 42 2a 2b 2c P P Takezawa 1987 Tada 1992, 1993 Zushi 1995 Ura 1999 Hiraiwa 2001 Tada 1992 Agr AgrOP-Spec Ura 1999 Hiraiwa 2001 TP-Spec Kuno 1973 2 3, 4 3a 3b 3c 3d
Stadard Theory:ST( ) Extended Standard Theory:EST( ) Rivised Extended Standard Theory:REST( ) Government and
2009 11 10 2000 1 Stadard Theory:ST(1957-1965) Extended Standard Theory:EST(1965-1973) Rivised Extended Standard Theory:REST(1973-1976) Government and Binding:GB/Principles and Parameters Theory:P&P(1981-1990)
Eng Ling Worksheet
Chapter 5 How English Phrases are Formed: Syntax I WHAT IS SYNTAX? syntactic = unit = constituent = verb phrase (VP) = 1. 統語論とはどのようなものか? 2. 構成素とは何か? 3. 動詞句とは何と何からできているのか? 4. 第 3 文型の文はどのような構造を持っているのか図で示しなさい
P
Cognitive Studies, 13(3), 392-403. (Sep. 2006) The present study investigated the canonical positions of four kinds of adverbial expressions (or adjuncts) in Japanese (i.e. modal, time, manner, and resultative
Microsoft Word - もくじ
Hornstein & Nunes (2008) Aoyagi (1999) complement adjunct do so one do so Hasegawa (1988) one 1 Minimalist Program Hornstein & Nunes (2008) (1) (1) VP Ellipsis Argument Ellipsis 1 (1) do so (2) 1 Otani
: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :
1 2 3 4 1 1 2 1 2.1 : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 1 2.2 : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 1 2.3 : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 2 2.4 : : : : : : : : : : : :
( ) ( ) Modified on 2009/05/24, 2008/09/17, 15, 12, 11, 10, 09 Created on 2008/07/02 1 1) ( ) ( ) (exgen Excel VBA ) 2)3) 1.1 ( ) ( ) : : (1) ( ) ( )
() ( ) Modified on 2009/05/24, 2008/09/17, 15, 12, 11, 10, 09 Created on 2008/07/02 1 1) () ( ) (exgen Excel VBA ) 2)3) 1.1 ( ) () : : (1) ( ) ( ) (2) / (1) (= ) (2) (= () =) 4)5) () ( ) () (=) (1) : (
null element [...] An element which, in some particular description, is posited as existing at a certain point in a structure even though there is no
![null element [...] An element which, in some particular description, is posited as existing at a certain point in a structure even though there is no](/thumbs/94/120992109.jpg "null element [...] An element which, in some particular description, is posited as existing at a certain point in a structure even though there is no")
null element [...] An element which, in some particular description, is posited as existing at a certain point in a structure even though there is no overt phonetic material present to represent it. Trask
Bloomfield, L. (1933). Language. Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. George Allen and Unwin. Mouton. Chomsky, N. (1964). Current issues in linguistic theory. Mouton. Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of
Modal Phrase MP because but 2 IP Inflection Phrase IP as long as if IP 3 VP Verb Phrase VP while before [ MP MP [ IP IP [ VP VP ]]] [ MP [ IP [ VP ]]]
![Modal Phrase MP because but 2 IP Inflection Phrase IP as long as if IP 3 VP Verb Phrase VP while before [ MP MP [ IP IP [ VP VP ]]] [ MP [ IP [ VP ]]]](/thumbs/89/98876548.jpg "Modal Phrase MP because but 2 IP Inflection Phrase IP as long as if IP 3 VP Verb Phrase VP while before [ MP MP [ IP IP [ VP VP ]]] [ MP [ IP [ VP ]]]")
30 4 2016 3 pp.195-209. 2014 N=23 (S)AdvOV (S)OAdvV 2 N=17 (S)OAdvV 2014 3, 2008 Koizumi 1993 3 MP IP VP 1 MP 2006 2002 195 Modal Phrase MP because but 2 IP Inflection Phrase IP as long as if IP 3 VP Verb
(3) (1b) ( ( ) ) (1a) (1b) ( 2) (1a) (1b) (mutual exclusion fallacy) (4) : (4) : ( ) ) = (rules) ( de Saussure ) (5) : (5) ( ) (plays) 5) 6) (
?? Modified on 10/08, 02/09/2010, 08/15, 13, 08/10, 08/04, 07/12,05, 05/31, 04/24,19; 01/01/2009; 12/29, 11/08, 10/17,12, 05/25,05, 03/28,20, 02/28,26,25/2008; Created on 02/24/2008 1 ( ) 2 2.1 ( ) (1a)
fi„‚å-‰³‹ç−w„¤‰ƒ‰IŠv48Ł\1-4.ai
Young Mandarin-Speaking Children's Understanding of Transitive and Intransitive Sentences Lu JIANG, Etsuko HARYU The meaning of a given verb roughly corresponds to the types of sentence in which the verb
els08ws-kuroda-slides.key
NICT 26 2008/11/15, Word Sketch Engine (Kilgarriff & Tugwell 01; Srdanovic, et al. 08) ( ) I-Language Grammar is Grammar and Usage is Usage (Newmeyer 03) (is-a ) ( )?? () // () ()???? ? ( )?? ( ) Web ??
1 ( ) (1) (2) Pattern 1 (P1)// Pattern 2 (P2) (V1 = V2) (alternation) (SPRAY-PAINT alternation/ hypallage) (1) (2) P1: (Z ) X Y V1 P2: (Z ) X Y
1 ( ) 1 1.1 (1) (2) Pattern 1 (P1)// Pattern 2 (P2) (V1 = V2) (alternation) (SPRAY-PAINT alternation/ hypallage) (1) (2) P1: (Z ) X Y V1 P2: (Z ) X Y V2 1.1.1 : (1) P2 (3) : (3) [ X [ X [ X ] ] ] [ Y ]
Corrected Version NICT /11/15, 1 Thursday, May 7,
Corrected Version NICT 26 2008/11/15, 1 1 Word Sketch Engine (Kilgarriff & Tugwell 01; Srdanovic, et al. 08) 2 2 3 3 ( ) I-Language Grammar is Grammar and Usage is Usage (Newmeyer 03) 4 4 (is-a ) ( ) (
九州大学学術情報リポジトリ Kyushu University Institutional Repository 日本語の sluicing 文に関する統語分析 前田, 雅子九州大学人文科学府 松本, 知子九州大学人文科学府 Maeda, Masako Graduate School of Huma
九州大学学術情報リポジトリ Kyushu University Institutional Repository 日本語の sluicing 文に関する統語分析 前田, 雅子九州大学人文科学府 松本, 知子九州大学人文科学府 Maeda, Masako Graduate School of Humanities, Kyushu University Matsumoto, Tomoko Graduate
助詞「に」の定量的分析の試み
1. 1 (1) a. b. c. d. 1a b c d cf. Langacker 1987, 1990, 2000, Goldberg 1995 5 3 1) 2) 3) 2. 1997 3 i A. B. C. A (cf. Goldberg 1995, 2003 B (cf. Langacker 1991) A)B C 1 19942 (2) a. b. c. 1994:150-165 1994
( ) ( ) (action chain) (Langacker 1991) ( 1993: 46) (x y ) x y LCS (2) [x ACT-ON y] CAUSE [BECOME [y BE BROKEN]] (1999: 215) (1) (1) (3) a. * b. * (4)
![( ) ( ) (action chain) (Langacker 1991) ( 1993: 46) (x y ) x y LCS (2) [x ACT-ON y] CAUSE [BECOME [y BE BROKEN]] (1999: 215) (1) (1) (3) a. * b. * (4)](/thumbs/40/20534161.jpg "( ) ( ) (action chain) (Langacker 1991) ( 1993: 46) (x y ) x y LCS (2) [x ACT-ON y] CAUSE [BECOME [y BE BROKEN]] (1999: 215) (1) (1) (3) a. * b. * (4)")
1 1 (lexical conceptual structure, LCS) 2 LCS 3 4 LCS 5 6 2 LCS (1999) LCS 2 (1) [x ACT(-ON y)] CAUSE [BECOME [z BE-AT w]] 1 (1993) ( ) V1 V2 2 (1) y z y z (5.3 ) ( ) ( ) (action chain) (Langacker 1991)
June 30, 2007
第 278 回 広 島 言 語 文 化 談 話 会 ( 於 : 広 島 大 学 東 千 田 キャンパス) 2007/06/30 義 務 的 で 無 意 味 な A 移 動 : There, DP, PP の 分 布 小 林 亜 希 子 ( 島 根 大 学 ) akiko.kobayashi.2005@soc.shimane-u.ac.jp 1. 義 務 的 で 無 意 味 な A- 移 動 1.1
11 2013 2 Tajfel Turner 1986 1988/1995) Tajfel 1981 p. 255 3 Turner 1987 in-group out-group 2 3 1988/1995 329
3 * 1 1 * hime_0404_4@yahoo.co.jp 1 328 11 2013 2 Tajfel Turner 1986 1988/1995) Tajfel 1981 p. 255 3 Turner 1987 in-group out-group 2 3 1988/1995 329 3 2 330 11 2013 4 5 4 2 2007 9 2007 11 2008 4 1988
JCSS2003 Program
20 20 20 TEXT 2003 6 6 6 7 6 8 1 5 1 C 201 C 301 2F 4 30 6,000 3,000 9,000 5 1 7,000 4,000 10,000 5,000 6 7 ( )19 5,000 4,000 5,000 182-8585 1 5 1 2003 Email: jcss2003-qa@complex.hc.uec.ac.jp URL: http://complex.hc.uec.ac.jp/jcss2003/
word S V O
word S V O 傍 擠 isolating language SVO a b E. The simplest at least the most economical method of conveying some sort of grammatical notion is to juxtapose two or more words in a definite sequence without
7 31 4 28 9 8 11 31 3 20 L 7 31 3 20 3 2 Semantic Nature of Verbs and Kinds of Relative Clauses Change Relatives; CR (Head-Internal Relative Clause; HIRC) CR Tonosaki (1998) pronominal (property) (1a)
untitled
Bas Aarts (2001) English Syntax and Argumentation. New York: Palgrave. Chapter 7 Cross-Categorial Generalizations: X-bar Syntax p.104, l.1, p.107, l.1, p.111, -l.5 p.116, -l.13, p.119, l.17, p.121, l.14
九州大学学術情報リポジトリ Kyushu University Institutional Repository 英語の二重目的語構文および前置詞与格構文について : ミニマリストアプローチ 大塚, 知昇九州大学人文科学府 Otsuka, Tomonori Graduate School of Hu
九州大学学術情報リポジトリ Kyushu University Institutional Repository 英語の二重目的語構文および前置詞与格構文について : ミニマリストアプローチ 大塚, 知昇九州大学人文科学府 Otsuka, Tomonori Graduate School of Humanities, Kyushu University https://doi.org/10.15017/24666
Lees (1964), Stockwell, et al. (1973), Akmajian and Henry (1975), Jacobson (1977), Ukaji (1978), etc. Downes (1977), Akmajian, Steele, and Wasow (1979
Lees (1964), Stockwell, et al. (1973), Akmajian and Henry (1975), Jacobson (1977), Ukaji (1978), etc. Downes (1977), Akmajian, Steele, and Wasow (1979), Sawada (1980), Sawada and Takaji (1982), etc. (11)
1 (p)l A TEX L A TEX ( Stanford CSLI Emma Pease 15 LATEX 2 lingmacros.sty gb4e.sty TeX Live \docu
L A TEX ( ) gunji@shoin.ac.jp 3.0 2017 7 1 2 2 2 2.1......................................... 2 2.2........................................ 6 2.3......................................... 6 3 7 4 8 5 10
On the Relation between the Deictic Use and the Non-deictic Use of the Japanese Demonstratives SATOSHI KINSUI* This paper addresses the status of deix
On the Relation between the Deictic Use and the Non-deictic Use of the Japanese Demonstratives SATOSHI KINSUI* This paper addresses the status of deixis and anaphoricity in Japanese demonstrative system.it
TALC Teaching and Language Corpora Wichmann et al. ; Kettemann & Marko ; Burnard & McEnery ; Aston ; Hunston ; Granger et al. ; Tan ; Sinclair ; Aston
TALC Teaching and Language CorporaWichmann et al. ; Kettemann & Marko ; Burnard & McEnery ; Aston ; Hunston ; Granger et al. ; Tan ; Sinclair ; Aston, Bernardini & Stewart G. Leech Leech Leech direct use
1 (1) (2a) (2b) (2) a. [ame ga [fur anakatta] ] b. [ [ame ga fur] anakatta] (2a) (2b) 1.1 (3) (4a) (4b) (3) (4) a. [ [ ] ] b. [ [ ] ] (4a) (4b) 3 (5)
![1 (1) (2a) (2b) (2) a. [ame ga [fur anakatta] ] b. [ [ame ga fur] anakatta] (2a) (2b) 1.1 (3) (4a) (4b) (3) (4) a. [ [ ] ] b. [ [ ] ] (4a) (4b) 3 (5)](/thumbs/91/107552852.jpg "1 (1) (2a) (2b) (2) a. [ame ga [fur anakatta] ] b. [ [ame ga fur] anakatta] (2a) (2b) 1.1 (3) (4a) (4b) (3) (4) a. [ [ ] ] b. [ [ ] ] (4a) (4b) 3 (5)")
(1) (2) (1) (2) 1 2 3 2 2 4 2 3 1 (1) (2a) (2b) (2) a. [ame ga [fur anakatta] ] b. [ [ame ga fur] anakatta] (2a) (2b) 1.1 (3) (4a) (4b) (3) (4) a. [ [ ] ] b. [ [ ] ] (4a) (4b) 3 (5) a. b.
第 1~ 第 4 行 が! 日 話 題 であり 低 い 膏 謂 に 押 さえられている 第 5 行 で 話 題 を 転 換 すると 共 に Halliday, M.A.K. (1973) Explorations in the Functions of Language. London: Edward Arnold. Halliday, M.A.K. (197 4) "The Place of
本文２／ＹＡ１３０７Ｚ
! "18, 2008 6 # $ # $ # $# $ # $ # $2 # $ # $ # $ spontaneous controlled Hopper & Thompson 1980 # transitivity $ # participants $ # agency $ # affectedness of object $ # $ volitionality kinesis aspect
/™Z‚å‰IŠv‚æ36“ƒ /fi¡„´“NŠm†€
do/does/did A Study of Teaching the Auxiliary Verbs do /does /did to Beginning Learners of EFL Yasuhiro Fujiwara do/does/did Abstract Mastery of the auxiliary verbs do/does/did, conventionally termed as
E-2 省略現象から見た日本語動名詞句の内部構造 内芝慎也 0. はじめに (1) a. [ 太郎との相席 ] は難しいが [ 次郎との ] は問題ない b. 花子は [ 太郎との相席 ] を断り 順子は [ 次郎との ] を断った c. * 順子は [ 太郎との相席 ] をし 花子は [ 次郎との
![E-2 省略現象から見た日本語動名詞句の内部構造 内芝慎也 0. はじめに (1) a. [ 太郎との相席 ] は難しいが [ 次郎との ] は問題ない b. 花子は [ 太郎との相席 ] を断り 順子は [ 次郎との ] を断った c. * 順子は [ 太郎との相席 ] をし 花子は [ 次郎との](/thumbs/96/128723821.jpg "E-2 省略現象から見た日本語動名詞句の内部構造 内芝慎也 0. はじめに (1) a. [ 太郎との相席 ] は難しいが [ 次郎との ] は問題ない b. 花子は [ 太郎との相席 ] を断り 順子は [ 次郎との ] を断った c. * 順子は [ 太郎との相席 ] をし 花子は [ 次郎との")
E-2 省略現象から見た日本語動名詞句の内部構造 内芝慎也 0. はじめに (1) a. [ 太郎との相席 ] は難しいが [ 次郎との ] は問題ない b. 花子は [ 太郎との相席 ] を断り 順子は [ 次郎との ] を断った c. * 順子は [ 太郎との相席 ] をし 花子は [ 次郎との ] をした (cf. 順子は [ 太郎との相席 ] をし 花子もした ) 動名詞 (verbal noun)
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) [1]
![( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) [1]](/thumbs/91/107609070.jpg "( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) [1]")
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) [1] [1] [2] 1 1 3 2.1 3 2.2 6 2.2.1 6 2.2.2 10 2.3 10 2.4 15 20 21 4.1 21 4.1.1 1936 21 4.1.2 1939 24 4.1.3 1950 25 4.1.4 1971 26 4.2 28 4.2.1 1980 28 4.2.2 1991 30 4.2.3 1982 33 4.2.4
橡学術用語集；鄭、金水、高宮、岡崎.PDF
a-series ambiguousness aspect Arabic disassimilate change of location motion activity intentionality intentional meaning semantic function semantic opposition semantic map semantic criterion semantic base
9_89.pdf
101 On the Complement Structure of Bare Infinitive Verbs Kazuko INOUE The purpose of this paper is to argue that the infinitival and participial complements of perception verbs and causative verb have,
On the Double Object Construction*
Larson (1988) の二重目的語構文分析の意義と問題点 郭楊 ( 九州大学大学院 ) kiminoyou@yahoo.co.jp キーワード : 二重目的語文 内在格 構造格 1. 研究目的生成文法の枠組みにおける研究では 格理論の仮定によって 様々な構文が分析されてきた その中で 今日でも まだその分析についてさまざまな意見があるのが 目的語が2つある二重目的語文である 本論文では その端緒となった
NE25.indb
fallen leaves * 1. fallen leaves fallen fallen leaves 2. fallen leaves 2.1. fallen leaves fallen fall 1 2 1 a. They found a big room. b. They found a hidden room. * 240-250 2015 240 2 a. His eyes remained
Microsoft PowerPoint SemanticAnalysis.ppt
[ 言語情報科学論 A] Semantic Analysis (J&M 1st Chap.15) 2007 年 07 月 09 日 言語情報科学講座林良彦教授 Text: Courtesy of Dr. Jurafsky, D. and Dr. Martin, J.H: Speech and Language Processing,1 st edition (Prentice Hall, 2000)
音楽とOR（片寄）
Directability 1957 1. 1950 Meyer [1] 1970 Higgins [2] 1980 Deutsch [3] 1980 [4] Lerdahl Jackendoff Generative Theory of Tonal Music (GTTM)[5] Narmour Impication - Realization Model (IRM) [6] 1950 1957
卒論 提出用ファイル.doc
11 13 1LT99097W (i) (ii) 0. 0....1 1....3 1.1....3 1.2....4 2....7 2.1....7 2.2....8 2.2.1....8 2.2.2....9 2.2.3.... 10 2.3.... 12 3.... 15 Appendix... 17 1.... 17 2.... 19 3.... 20... 22 (1) a. b. c.
PowerPoint プレゼンテーション
http://npcmj.ninjal.ac.jp/ Grammatical principles for annotation and query Stephen Wright Horn (Adjunct Researcher, Theory and Typology Division, National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics)
2012_00表紙
02 Network Program 05 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 13 60 5,800 06 07 Program 10 12 Program 14 Program 18 20 Program 22 24 Program 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Program 33 34 35 40 Program 41 42 43 44 45 46 Program
untitled
ADSLFTTH P2P CDN(Contents Delivery Network) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55
Grice (1957) S x p S A x 1. A p 2. A S 1 3. A S 1 p (intention-based semantics) S p x (Strawson 1964; Grice 1969; Schiffer 1972; Harman 1974; Bennett
2016/10/21 1 (implicature) (presupposition) (speech act) Sperber & Wilson (1986/1995) (inferential model) 2 Sperber & Wilson (1986/1995) (code model) (1) (2) (3) (5) 1 Grice (1957) S x p S A x 1. A p 2.
nlp1-05.key
実用的な構文解析 自然言語処理論 I 今までの例に挙げた文法は非常に単純 実用的な文法 いろいろな文に対応しなければならない それだけ規則の数も増える 5. 文法 3( 素性構造と ) 規則を効率的に管理する必要がある 1 2 一致の例 英語における一致 (agreement) 数 ( 単数形, 複数形 ) 人称 (1 人称,2 人称,3 人称 ) 名詞句の例 a desk the desks a
(e.ιg.pγ'01ηwuμ7η~ceα bl 伝 e pronou 江 m 工 nced"γ/uι7η~pγ'01ηwu1η~cθα blたe ~こ 対 して 沼 山 ng:20 と unshort のほうが 多 くみられる Allen, M. R. 1978. Morphological Investigations. UConn PhD. Clark, E. V. 1974. Normal
NINJAL Research Papers No.13
(NINJAL Research Papers) 13: 25 50 (2017) ISSN: 2186-134X print/2186-1358 online 25 Langacker 2016 Baseline Elaboration 3 V1-V2 V1 V2 V2 V1 * 1. compounding 2 lexeme Bauer 2003: 40 N-N V-N N-V V-V Langacker
07 mokuroku final.indd
2007 1 CONTENTS ISBN ISBN978-4-7890-XXXX-X 2 s s ' 3 1 1258-4 1228-7 1263-8 1245-4 2 1246-1 1247-8 224-9 1225-6 2100 192 1071-9 The Japan Times 2310 210 0917-1 3 1890 1144-0 1680 208 1137-2 4 1236-2 1212-6
09_06.indd
No. 23 人文社会科学論叢 March 2014 英語名詞句の内部構造の精緻化について 限定詞の生起位置に関する理論的可能性に関する考察 増冨和浩 1. はじめに 2. DP 分析 (Abney(1987)) の妥当性に関する検討 2.1. DP 分析における限定詞の生起位置について 2.2. 主要部 D の果たす機能について 3. 限定詞の生起位置について X バー理論の観点からの考察 4.
Saussure ( ) Glossematics function a presupposes b dependence Hjelmslev ( ) ( ) a. interdependence substance form b. determination sine c. constellati
Saussure ( ) Glossematics function a presupposes b dependence Hjelmslev ( ) ( ) a. interdependence substance form b. determination sine c. constellation constellation spit sp caps, sit, pit ( a-c) ( b,c)
1. interlanguage 1970 (phonology) morphology syntax Hymes 1972 (communicative competence) Interlanguage Pragmatics Blum- Kulka, House, & Kasper, 1989
1. interlanguage 1970 (phonology) morphology syntax Hymes 1972 (communicative competence) Interlanguage Pragmatics Blum- Kulka, House, & Kasper, 1989 2 socio-cultural norm pragmatic transfer 3, 1985 1
03山本雅子.indd
a 55 No. 22 b a There is a book on the desk. b There is a cat on the desk. a b a ' b ' there is issta 1982 1982 155 161 56 1 17 69 57 No. 22 66 2 95 X 164 58 105 209 2000 86 2005 3 59 No. 22 X 171 3 60
,,.,... a. Mark gave a book to Jane. b. Mark gave Jane a book.,.,,.,,.,, (act-out task).,,. a. The cow showed the dog to the horse. b. The cow showed
A Linguistic Approach to the Study of Language Acquisition William O'GRADY., (the study of language acquisition) (the linguistic approach).,.., (linguistic),. (contemporary linguistics),.,,..,,,.,,,.,,..,
2003 7 2005 5 pdf 1 2 198807 424/3 988074243 3 4 5 JIS JIS X 0208, 1997 http://www.pref.hiroshima.jp/soumu/bunsyo/monjokan/index.htm 198807 4 30 57 15 13447 2712 6976 298 666 27957861 6319889 20 82121989
1
第 248 回広島言語文化談話会 (2003/04/19) 於 : 広島女学院大学 Gapping in the Minimalist Program 小林亜希子 ( 広島修道大学 ) 1. Gapping ( 空所化 ) 構文 (1) a. John ate apples and Mary bananas. b. TP c. TP d. TP TP and TP TP and TP TP and???
18 11/19/2000 ON VERBAL INFLECTION IN JAPANESE Hiroshi Aoyagi Nanzan University 1. Introduction: Where s inflectional morphol
18 11/19/2000 ON VERBAL INFLECTION IN JAPANESE Hiroshi Aoyagi Nanzan University aoyagi@ic.nanzan-u.ac.jp 1. Introduction: Where s inflectional morphology in Japanese? 1.1 1.1 -ru, -ta (1)a-c (2)a-c (1)
数理言語
数理言語情報論 第 5 回 2009 年 月 4 日 数理言語情報学研究室講師二宮崇 今日の講義の予定 HPSG (HEAD-DRIVEN PHRASE STRUCTURE GRAMMAR, 主辞駆動句構造文法 ) 2 HPSG: 導入 Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar (Pollard & Sag 985, 994) 主辞が中心的な役割を果たす文法枠組 辞書の情報を増やすことにより
白井学習法(1).ppt
a Grammar Translation Method 19 1940~1960 Audiolingual Method - structural linguistics - behaviorism stimulus-response reinforcement habit formation (e.g., Skinner, 1957) 2 - L1 L2 [contrastive analysis]
課程博士学位申請論文
1... 5 2... 9 2.1... 9 2.1.1... 9 2.1.2... 13 2.1.2.1... 13 2.1.2.2... 16 2.1.2.3... 19 2.1.3... 20 2.2... 22 2.2.1... 22 2.2.2... 24 2.3 2... 29 3... 31 3.1... 31 3.1.1... 31 3.1.2... 32 3.1.3... 33 3.2...
Title Author(s) 日本語の主題の位置付けについて : 形容詞文を中心に Tuptim, Natthira Citation Issue Date Text Version ETD URL http://hdl.handle.net/11094/836 DOI rights Doctoral Dissertation Abstract About placing Topic
慶應
2014 9 4 1. Hale (1980) (1) a. b. c. Kuroda (1988) (2) a. b. c. wh Kuroda (1988) φ (3) a. Knowledge of Language... Last Resort, Full Interpretation b. Some Notes on Economy of Derivation and Representation...
Japanese Abbrevia-ons: Their Classifica-on and Accent -- Focusing on Compound Words Bimoraic foot [ ] H ( 左端の ) LH (Ito, 1990) H = Heavy syllable 重音節 L = Light syllable 軽音節 ) 1985 9 1988 10 -- -- 1993
6 68
1 2 3 1 2 4 67 6 68 1990 Y X X Y 1994 Y Y X X X 10 69 10 10 11 13 11 12 13 11 12 70 11 12Y 11 12 11 12 11 12 13 13 13 1994 14 15 1994 64 16 1994 67 17 71 17 17 17 16 Alfonso 1974 1973 1984 1991 1990 18
慶應2014.9.5
2014 9 5 Wh 1. wh (1) a. Tell me [ CP what [ TP John bought t ]] b. [which x: x a thing] John bought x (2) a. [ CP [ TP ] ] b. (Huang 1982, Lasnik and Saito 1984, Richards 2000) [ CP [ TP t ] ] [which
36 Theoretical and Applied Linguistics at Kobe Shoin No. 20, 2017 : Key Words: syntactic compound verbs, lexical compound verbs, aspectual compound ve
tikeya[at]shoin.ac.jp Difference between the Japanese Compound Verbs Das and Hajime : A Corpus-based Study Tomoko IKEYA Kobe Shoin Women s University Institute of Linguistic Sciences Abstract BCCWJ-NT
philology : philology linguistics : a. langue b. c. d. a. langue competence b. parole performance 1
philology : philology linguistics : a. langue b. c. d. a. langue competence b. paroleperformance 1 c. a Saussure Chomsky Saussure :- a bchomsky : :, Chomsky explanatory adequacy c c premise 2 b a-c Saussure
5temp+.indd
特集不自然言語処理 枠に収まらない リアルな 言語処理 5 日本語学習児の初期語彙発達 基応専般 小林哲生 永田昌明 NTT コミュニケーション科学基礎研究所 幼児の言語発達 発話データ収集の問題点 1 1 2 3 理 理 1 1 理 comprehensionproduction 理 理 1 first word 1 2 3 1 cross-sectional data 図 -1 12, 18,
Thomas Kuhn markedness McCawley (1985)
Thomas Kuhn markedness McCawley (1985) competenceperformance jury instructions Illinois Department of Public Aid Aid to Families with Dependent Children Judith N. Levi Levi 1994 Levi Roger Shuy explanatory
Cognitive Studies, 22(1), (March 2015) Conversational interactions contribute not only to the sharing of information and establishment of cons
Cognitive Studies, 22(1), 97-109. (March 2015) Conversational interactions contribute not only to the sharing of information and establishment of consensus but also to the construction and sustenance of
４ 小川／小川
B p p B pp M p T p M p Tp T pt T p T p T p p Tp T T p T p T pt p Tp p p p p p p p p T p p T T M M p p p p p p T p p p T T p T B T T p T T p T p T T T p T p p T p Tp T p p Tp T p T Tp T T p T p T p T p
148_hayatsu.indd
Gengo Kenkyu 148: 143 174 2015 * 1. 2 1 2 1 * 144 3 I a. b. II a. b. I II 3 3 2 1 -( ) -( ) 2 1 cause causative verb 1997 1998 2000 V-( ) 2 1924 -( ) -( ) 145 2. 2.1. 2007 2 3 1908 2 1977 Shibatani 197319781986
慶應
2014 9 2 1. 1980 1990 A. VP (Kuno 1978, Hinds 1973) B. N (Saito and Murasugi 1990) C. VP (Otani and Whitman 1991) D. (Takahashi 1994) A. (Oku 1998, Kim 1999) B. (Saito 2004, 2006, Takahashi 2008 ) C. (Saito
コーパスからの構文頻度の抽出と辞書への活用 : 現状と課題 大羽良 1. はじめに 2. 構文とは 2.1. Goldberg (1995, p1) Particular semantic structures together with their associated formal expres
コーパスからの構文頻度の抽出と辞書への活用 : 現状と課題 大羽良 1. はじめに 2. 構文とは 2.1. Goldberg (1995, p1) Particular semantic structures together with their associated formal expression must be recognized as constructions independent
158 citation form c. N T Archangeli Underspecification T Underspecification Contrastive Underspecification Radical Underspecification T Underspecifica
英 語 冠 詞 再 訪 高 橋 直 彦 0. 2010 1 2000, 2009 2 1 2010 N 2000, 2009 T 14 0 a. N T 2 b. N 1 3 T Phonetic Implementation 1 1988 TM IA IP 1 sign signature
1) A Consideration of the Use of the Phrase Tsumaranaimonodesuga by Comparison of the Contents of Japanese Textbooks and the Results of Actual Surveys
1) A Consideration of the Use of the Phrase Tsumaranaimonodesuga by Comparison of the Contents of Japanese Textbooks and the Results of Actual Surveys SEI Rumi This study aims to verify whether actual
2014年度の研究報告
2014 年度の研究報告 カラの主語性に関する研究 ーコーパス検索および文処理実験ー 1 D1としての一年 実験手法の勉強 EPR 行動実験 眼球運動 カラのコーパス検索 カラの構造的位置に関する文処理実験 ことばの科学 台湾での実験 報告内容 研究の構成 コーパス検索 ( カラの使用法の頻度パターン ) 文処理実験 今年の予定 研究の構成 カラ デ ニの主語性 に関して ( 三上 1970) コーパス検索の研究
g. *The fence hits easily. Levin : ff break e fg bc d a. Tony broke the window (with a hammer). b. #Tony broke the hammer against the window. c. *Tony
Abstract English has semi-productive lexical processes for alternating the syntactic realization of verb s arguments. A valid lexical semantic theory needs to explain how the semantics of a verb corresponds
<8A4F8D918CEA83578383815B8369838B82E082AD82B62E696E6464>
1 15 (2007) (2007) 16 23 B 4 17 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 4 2 4 2011 78 139 141 133 2012 85 166 132 187 2 2 18 (2011) (2012) 18 (2011) 2005 (2011) 3 6 (2009) (2011) Kiyota(2009) 1 6 (2010) 19 2011 20 No
複合動詞の研究文献 v.2
Ver. 2 (2012 9 19 ) Bibliography on Compound Verbs and Complex Predicates in Japanese http://www.ninjal.ac.jp/lexicon/level1/post_2/index.html 1604 1608 Rodriguez, Ioão Arte da Lingoa de Iapam. Nagasaki:
IPSJ-shinmori final.dvi
Vol. 45 No. 3 Mar. 2004 1 2 3 4 NTCIR3 Structure Analysis of Japanese Patent Claims using Cue Phrases Akihiro Shinmori, 1 Manabu Okumura, 2 Yuzo Marukawa 2 and Makoto Iwayama 4 The most important part
疑問詞と「か」と「も」Handout(Final)
疑 問 詞 と か と も 日 本 語 疑 問 文 の 通 時 的 対 照 言 語 学 的 研 究 第 3 回 研 究 発 表 会 2014 年 3 月 20 日 国 立 国 語 研 究 所 青 山 学 院 大 学 外 池 滋 生 1. はじめに (1) a. 何 時 の 間 も 神 さびけるか( 万 葉 集 259) b. いづくの 恋 そ 摑 みかかれる( 万 葉 集 695) c. いずれの
[2010]nanzan-paper1.01
![[2010]nanzan-paper1.01](/thumbs/94/118548329.jpg "[2010]nanzan-paper1.01")
--- --- () ([2004]pp.1-2) [2006] 3 () / by () () () () 1 by () by () A S A S A (A ) S A S A S S A A S [2009] [1] [2] R. [2008] [3]Is-Ought Gap 2 [2009] 3 [1]M. [2007] Sandis[2009] [1][2]([3] Charles Pigden
現代日本語の有情物主語の受身文
博士学位論文 ( 東京外国語大学 ) Doctoral Thesis (Tokyo University of Foreign Studies) 氏 名 金俸呈 ( キム, ボンジョン ) 学位の種類 博士 ( 学術 ) 学位記番号 博甲第 172 号 学位授与の日付 2013 年 10 月 9 日 学位授与大学 東京外国語大学 博士学位論文題目 現代日本語の有情物主語の受身文 受身文の 被影響 性を支える
‰gficŒõ/’ÓŠ¹
The relationship between creativity of Haiku and idea search space YOSHIDA Yasushi This research examined the relationship between experts' ranking of creative Haiku (a Japanese character poem including
2 2.1 NPCMJ ( (Santorini, 2010) (NPCMJ, 2016) (1) (, 2016) (1) (2) (1) ( (IP-MAT (CONJ ) (PP (NP (D ) (N )) (P )) (NP-SBJ *
Emacs Emacs : Emacs 1 Emacs Emacs ( ) (NPCMJ ) 1 Emacs NPCMJ 2 1 2 2.1 NPCMJ (http://npcmj.ninjal.ac.jp/) (Santorini, 2010) (NPCMJ, 2016) (1) (, 2016) (1) (2) (1) ( (IP-MAT (CONJ ) (PP (NP (D ) (N )) (P
NE25.indb
1. 265-276 2015 265 2. grammar 18 Robert Lowth Noam Chomsky 266 TOEIC 990 1 3. 20 Otto Jespersen 2 1985 A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language ( CGEL) 30 21 The Cambridge Grammar of the English
There is strong historical, sociolinguistic, and psycholinguistic evidence for viewing the epistemic use of modals as an extension of a more basic root meaning, rather than viewing the root sense as an
IPSJ SIG Technical Report Vol.2011-MUS-91 No /7/ , 3 1 Design and Implementation on a System for Learning Songs by Presenting Musical St
1 2 1, 3 1 Design and Implementation on a System for Learning Songs by Presenting Musical Structures based on Phrase Similarity Yuma Ito, 1 Yoshinari Takegawa, 2 Tsutomu Terada 1, 3 and Masahiko Tsukamoto
高橋論文.indd
統語論の授業についての覚え書き 高橋保夫 0. はじめに日本の英語学科 英文科などを持つ大学では高校までに学習するものとは少し異質な内容を持つ英文法の授業が開講されていると思われる 現代英文法 英語統語論 英語学特殊講義 などといった講義題目で 扱うレベルによって 学習文法に対しての科学文法といった感じのものから 英文法という概念からは完全に乖離した印象を与える純粋な理論言語学といった感じのものまであるのではないだろうか
p.14 p.14 p.17 1 p レッテル貼り文 2015: PC 20 p : PC 4
18 13 4 2017.10.1 キーワード 要 旨 1 はじめに 1 1988 K 2000 1-2 p.163 1 2000: 161 2 2000: 161 1 2 19 22015 p.14 p.14 p.17 1 p.17 1 2 2 3 2 レッテル貼り文 2015: 17 3 4 3 PC 20 p.40 2015: 21 28 3 PC 4 20 4 1 p.193 3 3 4 3
概要 CKY Parser(Section 9.1.2) の改良 事前にもつ知識の活用 実際のアプリケーションへの応用
The Syntactic Process 9.2 Toward Psychologically Realistic Parsers 9.3 CCG Parsing for Practical Applications ( 自然言語処理システム論 :7/11) コンピュータ科学専攻米澤研究室 M1 佐藤秀明 概要 CKY Parser(Section 9.1.2) の改良 事前にもつ知識の活用 実際のアプリケーションへの応用
04-04 第 57 回土木計画学研究発表会 講演集 vs
04-04 vs. 1 2 1 980-8579 6-6-06 E-mail: shuhei.yamaguchi.p7@dc.tohoku.ac.jp 2 980-8579 6-6-06 E-mail: akamatsu@plan.civil.tohoku.ac.jp Fujita and Ogawa(1982) Fujita and Ogawa Key Words: agglomeration economy,
- 137 - - 138 - - 139 - Larsen-Freeman Teaching Language: From Grammar to Grammaring form meaning use "I will ~." Iwill - 140 - R. Ellis Task-based Language Learning and Teaching Long Swain - 141 - - 142
33 (2016), 105 Abstract Keywords CAP Vol. 9 ( ) pp : : : :
Title < 書評 > コミュニケーション 意味 意図 ( 書評 : 柏端達也 (2016) コミュニケーションの哲学入門 ( 慶應義塾大学出版会, 105 頁 )) Author(s) 三木, 那由他 Citation Contemporary and Applied Philosophy Issue Date 2017-07-31 URL https://doi.org/10.14989/226626
untitled
C08036 C08037 C08038 C08039 C08040 1. 1 2. 1 2.1 1 2.2 1 3. 1 3.1 2 4. 2 5. 3 5.1 3 5.2 3 6. 4 7. 5 8. 6 9. 7 10. 7 11. 8 C08036 8 C08037 9 C08038 10 C08039 11 C08040 12 8 2-1 2-2 T.P. 1 1 3-1 34 9 28
1,2 3 I like *me / myself. You like *you / yourself. He likes him / himself. He thinks [ that he / *himself is intelligent ]. He thinks [ that Mary li
![1,2 3 I like *me / myself. You like *you / yourself. He likes him / himself. He thinks [ that he / *himself is intelligent ]. He thinks [ that Mary li](/thumbs/93/113519115.jpg "1,2 3 I like *me / myself. You like *you / yourself. He likes him / himself. He thinks [ that he / *himself is intelligent ]. He thinks [ that Mary li")
/ John likes himself. John likes him. 3 1,2 ModE, Russian yes yes OE no no French yes no (none) no yes B. Comrie. 2003. On explaining language universals. In: M. Tomasello ed. The New Psychology of Language.