Auerbach and Kotlikoff(1987) (1987) (1988) 4 (2004) 5 Diamond(1965) Auerbach and Kotlikoff(1987) 1 ( ) ,
|
|
- ゆゆこ はかまや
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 ,, A B C A (B Negishi(1960) (C) ( ) fujii@econ.kobe-u.ac.jp 082e527e@stu.kobe-u.ac.jp iritani@econ.kobe-u.ac.jp 1
2 Auerbach and Kotlikoff(1987) (1987) (1988) 4 (2004) 5 Diamond(1965) Auerbach and Kotlikoff(1987) 1 ( ) , , , % 4 (2001) 2000 (2007) (2001) 2
3 3 A B C (A) (B) (C) 6 (1988) (1999) 2004 (2005) 7 (1988) ( ) (2004) 8 (2001) (2001) 3
4 3 ( ) Negishi(1960) ( ) ( ) Negishi A B C (1988) (1996) Kato(1998) (1988) 9 9 4
5 (1996) ( ) Kato(1998) (1988) (2001) (2004) (2008) (1988) (2001) 10 ( ) (2004) (2001) ( ) 3 11 Shimono and Tachibanaki(1985) (1990) (2001) (2002a) (2006) (2008) Shimono and Tachibanaki(1985) (2004) 5
6 (1990) (2001) 12 (2002a) 13 (2006) (2008) 14 A B C (2002a) 14 (2006) (2008) 6
7 3.1 W τw T bw B r (1 τ)w T + bw + B 1 + r (1) (1 τ)w T (bw + B)/(1 + r) t j W j t t T t, B t t (τw j t + T t) = (bw j t 1 + B t) (2) j j 15 τ, b (2) τ, T t, b, B t h a 1, a 2,, a h, (a j < a j+1 ) d 1, d 2,, d h h d i = 1, d i 0 a j, d j t N t a j d j N t, j = 1, 2..., h t L t L t = (a 1 d 1 + a 2 d a h d h )N t = a j d j N t (3) 15 7
8 3.2 K L F (K, L) F 2 F 1 ( ) F K = F K (K, L) > 0, F L = F L (K, L) > 0, F KK = 2 F K 2 (K, L) < 0, F LL = 2 F L 2 (K, L) < 0, f(k) = F (k, 1), k = K/L f (k) > 0 f (k) < 0 F (K, L) lim f (k) = k 0 lim f (k) = 0. k 1 w t, r t t t F K = F K (Kd t, L d t ) = r t, F L = F L (Kd t, L d t ) = w t (4) (Kt d, L d t ) L d t = L t (4) 1 Kt d (r t ) 2 w t k = K/L Lf(k) = F (K, L) f(k) kf (k) = F L f(k(r t )) k(r t )f (k(r t )) = w t, k(r t )L t = K d t (r t ) 1 w t F K (Kt d (r t ), L t ) = r t dk d t dr t < 0, dw t dr t < 0 (5) 8
9 3.3 t t N t 1, N t S t 1 K t (= S t 1 ) L t r t w t t a i Wt i = a i w t (1 τ)a i w t T t a i ba i w t 1 + B t r t s t 1 t (1 τ)a i w t T t d i N t, i = 1,..., h ba i w t 1 + B t + r t s i t 1 d in t 1, i = 1,..., h u(c t, c t+1 ) u : R 2 + R 2 2 ( ) (1) R 2 + (quasi-concave) (2) x 1 0, x 2 0, u(x 1, 0) = u(0, x 2 ) = inf{u(x 1, x 2 ) (x 1, x 2 ) R 2 +} a i t max u(c yi t, coi t+1) sub to c yi t + s i t = (1 τ)a i w t T t, R2 ++ c oi t+1 = (1 + r t+1)s i t + ba i w t + B t+1 (6) c y t, co t+1 t a i c y t co t+1 si t s i t t + 1 9
10 max u(c yi t, coi t+1) sub to c yi t + coi t r t+1 = I i t (7) I i a i 16 I i t def 1 = (1 τ)a i w t T t + (ba i w t + B t+1 ) (8) 1 + r t+1 r t+1, w t, T t B t+1 It(r i t+1, w t, T t, B t+1 ) c o t = c oi t d i N t 1 = { (1 + rt )s i } t 1 + ba i w t 1 + B t di N t 1 (τa i w t + T t )d i N t = (ba i w t 1 + B t )d i N t 1 (9) 3.4 t (c yi t + s i t)d i N t + c oi t d i N t 1 = F (K t, L t ) + K t (10) ( (a i w t τa i w t T t )d i N t + bai w t 1 + B + (1 + r t )s i ) t 1 di N t 1 = a i w t d i N t +(1 + r t ) (τa i w t + T )d i N t + s i t 1d i N t 1 = w t (ba i w t 1 + B)d i N t 1 a i d i N t + (1 + r t )K t = w t L t + r t K t + K t = F (K t, L t ) + K t = 16 def = 10
11 t t + 1 r t+1 t + 1 L t+1 = a i d i N t+1 K t+1 F (K t+1, L t+1 ) = r t+1 K t+1 Kt+1 d (r t+1) h si t(r t+1 )d i N t K d t+1(r t+1 ) = s i t(r t+1 )d i N t (11) r t+1 1 t = 1 K 1, w 0, s i 0, N t(t = 0, 1, 2,... ), d i, a i τ, b, B t (t = 0, 1, 2,... ), 1 w 0 h si 0 (r 1)d i N 0 F K (K 1, L 1 ) r 1 r 1 = F K (K 1, L 1 ) r 1 w 1 = F L (K 1, L 1 ) (τa i w 1 + T 1 )d i N 1 = (ba i w 0 + B 1 )d i N 0 T 1 1 t 1 t 2 K d 2 (r 2 ) = h si 1 (r 2)d i N 1 (12) 11
12 r2 2 K 2 = K2 d(r 2 ) 2 t 2 r t, L t, K t (4) (9) (11) F L (Kt d, L t ) = w t (τa i w t + T t )d i N t = (ba i w t 1 + B t )d i N t 1 K d t+1(r t+1 ) = s i t(r t+1 )d i N t w t, T t, r t+1 Kt+1 d (r t+1) F K (Kt+1 d, L t+1) = r t+1 τ, b, B t d i, a i, N t (t = 0, 1, 2... ) w t, T t (11) (12) F K (K t+1, L t+1 ) = r t+1 Kt+1 d (r t+1) k(r t+1 ) = Kt+1 d (r t+1)/l t+1 Kt+1 d (r t+1) = L t+1 k(r t+1 ) r t+1 = f (k(r t+1 )), 1 = f dk dr t+1 r t+1 0 k(r t+1 ) r t+1 k(r t+1 ) 0 t+1 h si t(r t+1 )d i N t = S t (r t+1 ) 12
13 3 ds t (r t+1 )/dr t+1 0 ˆr S t (ˆr) > 0 r t+1 S t (r t+1 ) > Kt+1 d (r t+1) r t+1 Kt+1 d (r t+1) > S t (r t+1 ) r t+1 Kt+1 d (r t+1) < S t (r t+1 ) r Kt+1 d (r ) = S t (r ) t s i t = s i, c y t = cy, c o t = c o, K t = K, N t = N, L t = L, w t = w, r t = r, T t = T, B t = B, I i t = I i t = 1, 2, L = h a id i N r F K (K d, L) = 0, w F L (K d, L) = 0 (13a) (τa i w + T )d i N K d (ba i w + B)d i N = 0 s i (w, T, r, B)d i N = 0 (13b) (13c) t = 1 t = 2 18 Diamond(1965) 13
14 19 (w, r, K d, T ) B c y (r, I j ), c o (r, I j ) (13a) (13c) 4 ( ) τ > b. 4 (13b) (τ b) h a iwd i = B T 4 B > T a 13c (13a) K d (r) 13a 2 w = F L (K d (r), L) = w(r) (13b) (13c) 13c 1 + r (τa i w(r) + T )d i (ba i w(r) + B)d i = 0 (1 + r)k d (r) (1 + r) s i (w(r), T, r, B)d i N = 0 (14a) (14b) r, T 2 (7) I i def = (1 τ)a i w(r) T + ba iw(r) + B, i = 1, 2,..., h 1 + r (1 + r)s i = c oi (r, I i ) (ba i w + B), S = s i d i N 19 s i 14
15 14b (1 + r)k d (r) { c oi ( r, I i) (ba i w(r) + B) } d i N = 0 (15) 14a 15 r, T h (τ b)a dw id i 1 J = dr ( K d + (1 + r) dkd dr S + (1 + r) S ) h c oi I i r I i T d in K d = S J dw J = (τ b)a i d i dr { =K d (τ b) c r (ε + η) r c oj ( dk d I j d jn (1 + r) dr } S ) r c, ε, η c = c oj I j d j, ε = r dk d K d dr η = r S S r 0 < ε, 0 < η J (14a) (14b) r, T ψ 1 (r, T ), ψ 2 (r, T ) ṙ = ψ 2 (r, T ), T = ψ 1 (r, T ) J > 0 5 J >
16 (B) (T ) 5 6 c > Negishi(1960) 3. 3 r, I j, w, K, T, c k j, k = y, o B Ĩ j (B) = I j (r(b), w(b), T (B), B), w(b) = w(r(b)) c kj (B) = c kj (r(b), Ĩj (B)), k = y, o, K(B) = K(r(B)) 16
17 J = 0 r, T B 14a 15 dr J db 1 dt = ( ) h c oi 1 db I i 1 + r 1 d i N 5 ( 1 1 ) c oi dr db = 1 + r I i d in + N > 0 (16) J (14a) (16) dt db = dw dr (τ b)a j dr db d j + 1 > 1 (17) d K(B) db = dk dr dr db = 1 dr F KK db < 0 (18) 2 5, 6 B B c yj (B)d j N + K(B) = c oj (B)d j N = F ( K(B), L) s j (B)d j N, s j (B) def = (1 τ)a j w(b) T (B) c yj (B) B (17) (1 + r) d c yj db d j + d c oj db d j = r d w (1 τ)a j db d j r dt db < 0 (19) 17
18 j B V j (B) = u j ( c yj (B), c oj (B)) j dv j db = λ d c yj j db + λ j r d c oj db λ j j Negishi(1960) α j u j ( c yj, c oj )d j N, α j = 1/λ j, j = 1, 2,..., h (20) (19) d db α j u j ( c yj (B), c oj (B))d j N = r ) ((1 + r) d cyj db + d coj d j N < 0 db 3 5, 6 Negishi(1960) Negishi (1960) (20) 20 Ĩ j µ, σ, CV B 21 Ĩ i def = (1 τ)a i w(b) T (B) + ba i w(b) + B, i = 1, 2,..., h 1 + r(b) (2005) (2006) (2008) 18
19 τ b > 0 dr/db > 0 dt db = dw dr (τ b)a j dr db d j + 1 > 1 (( dĩj db = 1 τ + b 1 + r ) dw a j dr ba jw + B (1 + r) 2 ) dr db r dt db < 0 (21) B dµ/db < 0 1 dσ 2 2 db < 0 (22) 22 CV = h ) 2 (Ĩj d j 1 µ B CV 2 dcv 2 db = 2 (( ) ( )) Bµ 3 φ(b)2 2 ρ(b)σ a Bρ (B) Bφ (B) ρ(b) φ(b) (23) 23 φ(b) = (1 τ)w + bw/(1 + r), φ d((1 τ)w + bw/(1 + r)) (B) =, db ρ(b) = T + B/(1 + r), ρ d( T + B/(1 + r)) (B) = db Ĩ i = φ(b)a i + ρ(b), i = 1, 2,..., h φ(b) a i w ρ(b) φ(b) >
20 0, φ (B) < 0, ρ (B) < 0 ρ(b) Bφ /φ B Bρ /ρ B 4 5, 6 ρ < 0 ρ > 0 Bφ /φ > Bρ /ρ, 6 A B C 3 (2004) (2002) (2002) 20
21 Negishi(1960) (2002) (2004) 24 2 (2002b) r w (2002) (2004) 21
22 5 (22) (23) B Ĩ i Ĩ j ( Ĩ j = (1 τ) w + b w ) a j T + B 1 + r 1 + r = φ(b)a j + ρ(b) φ(b) > 0 dĩi /db, dµ/db (( 1 τ + b φ (B) = dφ ) dw db (B) = 1 + r dr ρ (B) = dρ db (B) = B dr (1 + r) 2 db r dt db dĩj db = φ (B)a j + ρ (B), dµ db = φ (B)ā + ρ (B) bw (1 + r) 2 ) dr db ā = h a id i φ (B) < 0, ρ (B) < 0 σ 1 dσ 2 2 db = I i dii db d i I i dµ db d i ( = φ I i a i d i + ρ µ φ āµ ρ µ = φ ā I i a id i ā µ ( Ĩ j = Ĩ1 + (1 τ) w + b w ) (a j a 1 ) = 1 + r Ĩ1 + φ(b)(a j a 1 ), j = 1, 2,..., h Ĩ i a id i ā = Ĩ 1 a id i ā µ = + φ ( Ĩ i d i = Ĩ1 + φ(b) ( ) ( ) ai d i ā a a i d i i a 1 = Ĩ1 + φ(b) ā a i a 1 ) a i d i a 1 ) a i d i ā a i = 1 ā a 2 i d i = 1 ā (ā2 + σ 2 a ) > ā = a i d i 22
23 σ a a j, j = 1, 2,..., h Ĩ i a id i ā > µ (24) φ (B) < 0 1 dσ 2 2 db < 0 25 B dcv 2 db = 2 µ 3 d i d j Ĩ j Ĩ i Ĩi B d i d j (Ĩj ) 2 Ĩi (25) B (25) d i d j Ĩ j Ĩ i Ĩi B = µ d i Ĩ i Ĩi B = µ d i Ĩ i (φ a i + ρ ) = µφ d i a i Ĩ i + µ 2 ρ = µφ ( āĩ1 + φ(b) ( ā 2 + σ a 2 a 1 ā )) + µ 2 ρ (25) d i d j (Ĩj ) 2 Ĩi B = d j (Ĩj ) 2 d i Ĩi B = d j (Ĩj ) 2 d i (φ a i + ρ ) = (µ 2 + σ 2 )(φ ā + ρ ) = φ µ 2 ā + ρ µ 2 + φ σ 2 ā + ρ σ 2 dcv 2 db = 2 ( ( µ 3 µφ āĩ1 + φ(b) ( ā 2 + σ 2 a a 1 ā )) ) (φ µ 2 ā + φ σ 2 ā + ρ σ 2 ) µ = φā + ρ = Ĩ1 + φ(b)(ā a 1 ), σ 2 = φ 2 σ a 2. dcv 2 db = 2 ) ( µ 3 B φ2 2 ρσ a (( Bρ Bφ )) ρ φ
24 [1] (1996),,pp [2] (2002),No.37,pp [3] (2001),42,pp [4] (2002a),10,pp [5] (2002b) -,28,pp [6] (2004),167,pp.1-17 [7] (2008) -,43,pp [11] (2004) Discussion Paper,No.408,pp.1-19 [11] (2005) [11] (2006) -,, 3 [11] (2008),, 6 24
25 [12] (2005),pp [13] (2007) ,43,pp [14] (1990), 118,pp [15] (1987) 6,pp [16] (1988),pp.1-15 [17] (2001),37,pp [18] (1999) [19] Auerbach, A. and Kotlikoff, L.J.(1987), Dynamic Fiscal Policy, Cambridge University Press. [20] Diamond, P.A.(1965), National Debt in a Neoclassical Growth Model, American Economic Review, Vol.55, No.5, pp [21] Kato, R.(1998), Transition to an Aging Japan Public Pension, Savings, and Capital Taxation, Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Vol.12, pp [22] Negishi, T.(1960), Welfare Economics and Existence of an Equilibrium for a Competitive Economy, Metroeconomica, Vol.12, No.2-3, pp [23] Shimono, K. and Tachibanaki, T.(1985), Lifetime Income and Public Pension An Analysis of the Effect on Redistribution Using a Two-period Analysis, Journal of Public Economics, Vol.26, pp
(2004 ) 2 (A) (B) (C) 3 (1987) (1988) Shimono and Tachibanaki(1985) (2008) , % 2 (1999) (2005) 3 (2005) (2006) (2008)
,, 23 4 30 (i) (ii) (i) (ii) Negishi (1960) 2010 (2010) ( ) ( ) (2010) E-mail:fujii@econ.kobe-u.ac.jp E-mail:082e527e@stu.kobe-u.ac.jp E-mail:iritani@econ.kobe-u.ac.jp 1 1 16 (2004 ) 2 (A) (B) (C) 3 (1987)
More informationshuron.dvi
01M3065 1 4 1.1........................... 4 1.2........................ 5 1.3........................ 6 2 8 2.1.......................... 8 2.2....................... 9 3 13 3.1.............................
More informationTitle 最適年金の理論 Author(s) 藤井, 隆雄 ; 林, 史明 ; 入谷, 純 ; 小黒, 一正 Citation Issue Date Type Technical Report Text Version publisher URL
Title 最適年金の理論 Author(s) 藤井, 隆雄 ; 林, 史明 ; 入谷, 純 ; 小黒, 一正 Citation Issue 2012-06 Date Type Technical Report Text Version publisher URL http://hdl.handle.net/10086/23085 Right Hitotsubashi University Repository
More informationp *2 DSGEDynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium New Keynesian *2 2
2013 1 nabe@ier.hit-u.ac.jp 2013 4 11 Jorgenson Tobin q : Hayashi s Theorem : Jordan : 1 investment 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 *1 *1 93SNA 1 p.180 1936 100 1970 *2 DSGEDynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium New Keynesian
More information~nabe/lecture/index.html 2
2001 12 13 1 http://www.sml.k.u-tokyo.ac.jp/ ~nabe/lecture/index.html nabe@sml.k.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2 1. 10/ 4 2. 10/11 3. 10/18 1 4. 10/25 2 5. 11/ 1 6. 11/ 8 7. 11/15 8. 11/22 9. 11/29 10. 12/ 6 1 11. 12/13
More informationCOE-RES Discussion Paper Series Center of Excellence Project The Normative Evaluation and Social Choice of Contemporary Economic Systems Graduate Scho
COE-RES Discussion Paper Series Center of Excellence Project The Normative Evaluation and Social Choice of Contemporary Economic Systems Graduate School of Economics and Institute of Economic Research
More informationGraduate School of Policy and Management, Doshisha University 53 動学的資本税協調と公的資本形成 あらまし Zodrow and Mieszkowski 1986 Wilson 1986 Batina はじめに Zodr
Graduate School of Policy and Management, Doshisha University 53 動学的資本税協調と公的資本形成 あらまし Zodrow and Mieszkowski 1986 Wilson 1986 Batina 2009 1. はじめに Zodrow and Mieszkowski 1986 Wilson 1986 Tax Competition
More informationD = [a, b] [c, d] D ij P ij (ξ ij, η ij ) f S(f,, {P ij }) S(f,, {P ij }) = = k m i=1 j=1 m n f(ξ ij, η ij )(x i x i 1 )(y j y j 1 ) = i=1 j
6 6.. [, b] [, d] ij P ij ξ ij, η ij f Sf,, {P ij } Sf,, {P ij } k m i j m fξ ij, η ij i i j j i j i m i j k i i j j m i i j j k i i j j kb d {P ij } lim Sf,, {P ij} kb d f, k [, b] [, d] f, d kb d 6..
More informationú r(ú) t n [;t] [;t=n]; (t=n; 2t=n]; (2t=n; 3t=n];:::; ((nä 1)t=n;t] n t 1 (nä1)t=n e Är(t)=n (nä 2)t=n e Är(t)=n e Är((nÄ1)t=n)=n t e Är(t)=n e Är((n
1 1.1 ( ) ö t 1 (1 +ö) Ä1 2 (1 +ö=2) Ä2 ö=2 n (1 +ö=n) Än n t (1 +ö=n) Änt t nt n t lim (1 n!1 +ö=n)änt = n!1 lim 2 4 1 + 1 n=ö! n=ö 3 5 Äöt = î lim s!1 í 1 + 1 ì s ï Äöt =e Äöt s e eëlim s!1 (1 + 1=s)
More informationII 2 II
II 2 II 2005 yugami@cc.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp 2005 4 1 1 2 5 2.1.................................... 5 2.2................................. 6 2.3............................. 6 2.4.................................
More information5 1.2, 2, d a V a = M (1.2.1), M, a,,,,, Ω, V a V, V a = V + Ω r. (1.2.2), r i 1, i 2, i 3, i 1, i 2, i 3, A 2, A = 3 A n i n = n=1 da = 3 = n=1 3 n=1
4 1 1.1 ( ) 5 1.2, 2, d a V a = M (1.2.1), M, a,,,,, Ω, V a V, V a = V + Ω r. (1.2.2), r i 1, i 2, i 3, i 1, i 2, i 3, A 2, A = 3 A n i n = n=1 da = 3 = n=1 3 n=1 da n i n da n i n + 3 A ni n n=1 3 n=1
More informationPFI
PFI 23 3 3 PFI PFI 1 1 2 3 2.1................................. 3 2.2..................... 4 2.3.......................... 5 3 7 3.1................................ 7 3.2.................................
More informationOHP.dvi
7 2010 11 22 1 7 http://www.sml.k.u-tokyo.ac.jp/members/nabe/lecture2010 nabe@sml.k.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2 1. 10/ 4 2. 10/18 3. 10/25 2, 3 4. 11/ 1 5. 11/ 8 6. 11/15 7. 11/22 8. 11/29 9. 12/ 6 skyline 10. 12/13
More informationN/m f x x L dl U 1 du = T ds pdv + fdl (2.1)
23 2 2.1 10 5 6 N/m 2 2.1.1 f x x L dl U 1 du = T ds pdv + fdl (2.1) 24 2 dv = 0 dl ( ) U f = T L p,t ( ) S L p,t (2.2) 2 ( ) ( ) S f = L T p,t p,l (2.3) ( ) U f = L p,t + T ( ) f T p,l (2.4) 1 f e ( U/
More informationuntitled
2 21 1984 50 3500 4200 1 3 1 1985 1984 1 2 1984 50 3 2 3 4 1 1989 35 3 4 5 22 3 1 19811984 19841987 1989 1981 1985 13 1984 1984 1986 1985 20 10 1987 10 2 36 1989 65 1989 1953 1985 60 1933 6.71% 43 3.15%53
More information2015 : (heterogenous) Heterogeneous homogeneous Heterogenous agent model Bewley 1 (The Overlapping-Generations Models:OLG) OLG OLG Allais (1
2015 : 27 6 13 1 (heterogenous) Heterogeneous homogeneous Heterogenous agent model Bewley 1 (The Overlapping-Generations Models:OLG) OLG OLG Allais (1947) 2 Samuelson(1958) 3 OLG Solow Ramsey Samuelson
More information: 2005 ( ρ t +dv j =0 r m m r = e E( r +e r B( r T 208 T = d E j 207 ρ t = = = e t δ( r r (t e r r δ( r r (t e r ( r δ( r r (t dv j =
72 Maxwell. Maxwell e r ( =,,N Maxwell rot E + B t = 0 rot H D t = j dv D = ρ dv B = 0 D = ɛ 0 E H = μ 0 B ρ( r = j( r = N e δ( r r = N e r δ( r r = : 2005 ( 2006.8.22 73 207 ρ t +dv j =0 r m m r = e E(
More information2002 11 21 1 http://www.sml.k.u-tokyo.ac.jp/members/nabe/lecture2002 http://www.sml.k.u-tokyo.ac.jp/members/nabe/lecture nabe@sml.k.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2 1. 10/10 2. 10/17 3. 10/24 4. 10/31 5. 11/ 7 6. 11/14
More information1 (Berry,1975) 2-6 p (S πr 2 )p πr 2 p 2πRγ p p = 2γ R (2.5).1-1 : : : : ( ).2 α, β α, β () X S = X X α X β (.1) 1 2
2005 9/8-11 2 2.2 ( 2-5) γ ( ) γ cos θ 2πr πρhr 2 g h = 2γ cos θ ρgr (2.1) γ = ρgrh (2.2) 2 cos θ θ cos θ = 1 (2.2) γ = 1 ρgrh (2.) 2 2. p p ρgh p ( ) p p = p ρgh (2.) h p p = 2γ r 1 1 (Berry,1975) 2-6
More information1: 3.3 1/8000 1/ m m/s v = 2kT/m = 2RT/M k R 8.31 J/(K mole) M 18 g 1 5 a v t πa 2 vt kg (
1905 1 1.1 0.05 mm 1 µm 2 1 1 2004 21 2004 7 21 2005 web 2 [1, 2] 1 1: 3.3 1/8000 1/30 3 10 10 m 3 500 m/s 4 1 10 19 5 6 7 1.2 3 4 v = 2kT/m = 2RT/M k R 8.31 J/(K mole) M 18 g 1 5 a v t πa 2 vt 6 6 10
More information6 2 T γ T B (6.4) (6.1) [( d nm + 3 ] 2 nt B )a 3 + nt B da 3 = 0 (6.9) na 3 = T B V 3/2 = T B V γ 1 = const. or T B a 2 = const. (6.10) H 2 = 8π kc2
1 6 6.1 (??) (P = ρ rad /3) ρ rad T 4 d(ρv ) + PdV = 0 (6.1) dρ rad ρ rad + 4 da a = 0 (6.2) dt T + da a = 0 T 1 a (6.3) ( ) n ρ m = n (m + 12 ) m v2 = n (m + 32 ) T, P = nt (6.4) (6.1) d [(nm + 32 ] )a
More information201711grade1ouyou.pdf
2017 11 26 1 2 52 3 12 13 22 23 32 33 42 3 5 3 4 90 5 6 A 1 2 Web Web 3 4 1 2... 5 6 7 7 44 8 9 1 2 3 1 p p >2 2 A 1 2 0.6 0.4 0.52... (a) 0.6 0.4...... B 1 2 0.8-0.2 0.52..... (b) 0.6 0.52.... 1 A B 2
More information(1.2) T D = 0 T = D = 30 kn 1.2 (1.4) 2F W = 0 F = W/2 = 300 kn/2 = 150 kn 1.3 (1.9) R = W 1 + W 2 = = 1100 N. (1.9) W 2 b W 1 a = 0
1 1 1.1 1.) T D = T = D = kn 1. 1.4) F W = F = W/ = kn/ = 15 kn 1. 1.9) R = W 1 + W = 6 + 5 = 11 N. 1.9) W b W 1 a = a = W /W 1 )b = 5/6) = 5 cm 1.4 AB AC P 1, P x, y x, y y x 1.4.) P sin 6 + P 1 sin 45
More information1 (2005) (2004) (2005) (2006) 1: (2007) 2 2 2: Auerbach, Gokhale and Kotlikoff(1991) Gokhale (2005)
3 1 2 (2007) 3 3 1 2 3 2 1 2 JEL H55 Key words public pension social security subsidy general accounts sustainability generational accounts 1 2004 2000 2009 3 1 2 1 65 ecms1019@kwansei.ac.jp 1 1 (2005)
More information4. ϵ(ν, T ) = c 4 u(ν, T ) ϵ(ν, T ) T ν π4 Planck dx = 0 e x 1 15 U(T ) x 3 U(T ) = σt 4 Stefan-Boltzmann σ 2π5 k 4 15c 2 h 3 = W m 2 K 4 5.
A 1. Boltzmann Planck u(ν, T )dν = 8πh ν 3 c 3 kt 1 dν h 6.63 10 34 J s Planck k 1.38 10 23 J K 1 Boltzmann u(ν, T ) T ν e hν c = 3 10 8 m s 1 2. Planck λ = c/ν Rayleigh-Jeans u(ν, T )dν = 8πν2 kt dν c
More informationAutumn II III Zon and Muysken 2005 Zon and Muysken 2005 IV II 障害者への所得移転の経済効果 分析に用いるデータ
212 Vol. 44 No. 2 I はじめに 2008 1 2 Autumn 08 213 II III Zon and Muysken 2005 Zon and Muysken 2005 IV II 障害者への所得移転の経済効果 17 18 1 分析に用いるデータ 1 2005 10 12 200 2 2006 9 12 1 1 2 129 35 113 3 1 2 6 1 2 3 4 4 1
More information20 4 20 i 1 1 1.1............................ 1 1.2............................ 4 2 11 2.1................... 11 2.2......................... 11 2.3....................... 19 3 25 3.1.............................
More informationJorgenson F, L : L: Inada lim F =, lim F L = k L lim F =, lim F L = 2 L F >, F L > 3 F <, F LL < 4 λ >, λf, L = F λ, λl 5 Y = Const a L a < α < CES? C
27 nabe@ier.hit-u.ac.jp 27 4 3 Jorgenson Tobin q : Hayashi s Theorem Jordan Saddle Path. GDP % GDP 2. 3. 4.. Tobin q 2 2. Jorgenson F, L : L: Inada lim F =, lim F L = k L lim F =, lim F L = 2 L F >, F
More informationD v D F v/d F v D F η v D (3.2) (a) F=0 (b) v=const. D F v Newtonian fluid σ ė σ = ηė (2.2) ė kl σ ij = D ijkl ė kl D ijkl (2.14) ė ij (3.3) µ η visco
post glacial rebound 3.1 Viscosity and Newtonian fluid f i = kx i σ ij e kl ideal fluid (1.9) irreversible process e ij u k strain rate tensor (3.1) v i u i / t e ij v F 23 D v D F v/d F v D F η v D (3.2)
More informationmeiji_resume_1.PDF
β β β (q 1,q,..., q n ; p 1, p,..., p n ) H(q 1,q,..., q n ; p 1, p,..., p n ) Hψ = εψ ε k = k +1/ ε k = k(k 1) (x, y, z; p x, p y, p z ) (r; p r ), (θ; p θ ), (ϕ; p ϕ ) ε k = 1/ k p i dq i E total = E
More information12056286_03.indd
: 82 1 2013 7 2010 2011 1 30 2010 30 2011 30 2010 9 10 11 2011 1 2 1 2010 9 UK UK UK UK UK p. 843 45 82 1 1 UK 9 9 2007-08 UK 30% 30 20%30 150 30 32.5% 2030% p. 843 3 2004-05 5% 5% 75% p. 843 2010 11 1963
More informationPart () () Γ Part ,
Contents a 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 7 7. 8.. 8.. 8.3. 8 Part. 9. 9.. 9.. 3. 3.. 3.. 3 4. 5 4.. 5 4.. 9 4.3. 3 Part. 6 5. () 6 5.. () 7 5.. 9 5.3. Γ 3 6. 3 6.. 3 6.. 3 6.3. 33 Part 3. 34 7. 34 7.. 34 7.. 34 8. 35
More informationPublic Pension and Immigration The Effects of Immigration on Welfare Inequality The immigration of unskilled workers has been analyzed by a considerab
Public Pension and Immigration The Effects of Immigration on Welfare Inequality The immigration of unskilled workers has been analyzed by a considerable amount of research, which has noted an ability distribution.
More informationt = h x z z = h z = t (x, z) (v x (x, z, t), v z (x, z, t)) ρ v x x + v z z = 0 (1) 2-2. (v x, v z ) φ(x, z, t) v x = φ x, v z
I 1 m 2 l k 2 x = 0 x 1 x 1 2 x 2 g x x 2 x 1 m k m 1-1. L x 1, x 2, ẋ 1, ẋ 2 ẋ 1 x = 0 1-2. 2 Q = x 1 + x 2 2 q = x 2 x 1 l L Q, q, Q, q M = 2m µ = m 2 1-3. Q q 1-4. 2 x 2 = h 1 x 1 t = 0 2 1 t x 1 (t)
More information2017 : (heterogenous) Heterogeneous homogeneous Heterogenous agent model Bewley 1 exante (The Overlapping-Generations Models:OLG) OLG OLG Al
2017 : 29 5 24 1 (heterogenous) Heterogeneous homogeneous Heterogenous agent model Bewley 1 exante (The Overlapping-Generations Models:OLG) OLG OLG Allais (1947) 2 Samuelson(1958) 3 OLG Solow Ramsey 1
More information20 9 19 1 3 11 1 3 111 3 112 1 4 12 6 121 6 122 7 13 7 131 8 132 10 133 10 134 12 14 13 141 13 142 13 143 15 144 16 145 17 15 19 151 1 19 152 20 2 21 21 21 211 21 212 1 23 213 1 23 214 25 215 31 22 33
More informationDiscussion Paper #
Title 年金制度と生活保護制度 Author(s) 山重, 慎二 ; 高畑, 純一郎 Citation Issue 2009-06 Date Type Technical Report Text Version publisher URL http://hdl.handle.net/10086/17428 Right Hitotsubashi University Repository Discussion
More informationuntitled
2 book conference 1990 2003 14 Repeated Cross-Section Data 1 M1,M2 M1 Sekine(1998) Repeated Cross-Section Data 1 1. (1989), Yoshida and Rasche(1990), Rasche(1990), 19921997, Fujiki and Mulligan(1996),
More information,. Black-Scholes u t t, x c u 0 t, x x u t t, x c u t, x x u t t, x + σ x u t, x + rx ut, x rux, t 0 x x,,.,. Step 3, 7,,, Step 6., Step 4,. Step 5,,.
9 α ν β Ξ ξ Γ γ o δ Π π ε ρ ζ Σ σ η τ Θ θ Υ υ ι Φ φ κ χ Λ λ Ψ ψ µ Ω ω Def, Prop, Th, Lem, Note, Remark, Ex,, Proof, R, N, Q, C [a, b {x R : a x b} : a, b {x R : a < x < b} : [a, b {x R : a x < b} : a,
More informationK E N Z U 2012 7 16 HP M. 1 1 4 1.1 3.......................... 4 1.2................................... 4 1.2.1..................................... 4 1.2.2.................................... 5................................
More informationuntitled
18 1 2,000,000 2,000,000 2007 2 2 2008 3 31 (1) 6 JCOSSAR 2007pp.57-642007.6. LCC (1) (2) 2 10mm 1020 14 12 10 8 6 4 40,50,60 2 0 1998 27.5 1995 1960 40 1) 2) 3) LCC LCC LCC 1 1) Vol.42No.5pp.29-322004.5.
More informationhttp://www.ns.kogakuin.ac.jp/~ft13389/lecture/physics1a2b/ pdf I 1 1 1.1 ( ) 1. 30 m µm 2. 20 cm km 3. 10 m 2 cm 2 4. 5 cm 3 km 3 5. 1 6. 1 7. 1 1.2 ( ) 1. 1 m + 10 cm 2. 1 hr + 6400 sec 3. 3.0 10 5 kg
More informationわが国企業による資金調達方法の選択問題
* takeshi.shimatani@boj.or.jp ** kawai@ml.me.titech.ac.jp *** naohiko.baba@boj.or.jp No.05-J-3 2005 3 103-8660 30 No.05-J-3 2005 3 1990 * E-mailtakeshi.shimatani@boj.or.jp ** E-mailkawai@ml.me.titech.ac.jp
More informationβdxβ r a, < E e uγ r ha d E e r dx e r γd e r βdx 3.2 a = {a} γ = {γ} max E e r dx e r γd e r βdx, 2 s.. dx = qand + σndz, 1 E e r uγ ha d, 3 a arg maxã E e r uγ hã d. 4 3.3 γ = {γ : γ, γ} a = {a : a,
More informationI ( ) 1 de Broglie 1 (de Broglie) p λ k h Planck ( Js) p = h λ = k (1) h 2π : Dirac k B Boltzmann ( J/K) T U = 3 2 k BT
I (008 4 0 de Broglie (de Broglie p λ k h Planck ( 6.63 0 34 Js p = h λ = k ( h π : Dirac k B Boltzmann (.38 0 3 J/K T U = 3 k BT ( = λ m k B T h m = 0.067m 0 m 0 = 9. 0 3 kg GaAs( a T = 300 K 3 fg 07345
More information1 CAPM: I-,,, I- ( ) 1 I- I- I- ( CAPM) I- CAPM I- 1 I- Jensen Fama-French 3 I- Fama-French 3 I- Fama-MacBeth I- SMB-FL, HML-FL Fama-MacBeth 1 Fama-Fr
1 CAPM: I-,,, I- ( ) 1 I- I- I- ( CAPM) I- CAPM I- 1 I- Jensen Fama-French 3 I- Fama-French 3 I- Fama-MacBeth I- SMB-FL, HML-FL Fama-MacBeth 1 Fama-French (FF) 3 [5] (Capital Asset Pricing Model; CAPM
More information遺産相続、学歴及び退職金の決定要因に関する実証分析 『家族関係、就労、退職金及び教育・資産の世代間移転に関する世帯アンケート調査』
2-1. (2-1 ) (2-2 ) (2-3 ) (Hayashi [1986]Dekle [1989]Barthold and Ito [1992] [1996]Campbell [1997] [1998]Shimono and Ishikawa [2002]Shimono and Otsuki [2006] [2008]Horioka [2009]) 1 2-1-1 2-1-1-1 8 (1.
More information18 I ( ) (1) I-1,I-2,I-3 (2) (3) I-1 ( ) (100 ) θ ϕ θ ϕ m m l l θ ϕ θ ϕ 2 g (1) (2) 0 (3) θ ϕ (4) (3) θ(t) = A 1 cos(ω 1 t + α 1 ) + A 2 cos(ω 2 t + α
18 I ( ) (1) I-1,I-2,I-3 (2) (3) I-1 ( ) (100 ) θ ϕ θ ϕ m m l l θ ϕ θ ϕ 2 g (1) (2) 0 (3) θ ϕ (4) (3) θ(t) = A 1 cos(ω 1 t + α 1 ) + A 2 cos(ω 2 t + α 2 ), ϕ(t) = B 1 cos(ω 1 t + α 1 ) + B 2 cos(ω 2 t
More information2019 1 5 0 3 1 4 1.1.................... 4 1.1.1......................... 4 1.1.2........................ 5 1.1.3................... 5 1.1.4........................ 6 1.1.5......................... 6 1.2..........................
More information2016 (8) Variety Expansion Effects by Feenstra (1994) 1 Variety Effects Dixit and Stiglitz (1977) CES n n? n t U t = ( nt i=1 σ > 1, a it > 0,
2016 8 29 1 4 Variety Expansion Effects by Feenstra 1994 1 Variety Effects Dix and Stiglz 1977 CES n n? n t U t σ > 1, a > 0, σ a q σ n a 1 σ a p q U t P t E U t, p t U t P t U t V p, I I t a σ p 1 σ a
More informationTOP URL 1
TOP URL http://amonphys.web.fc.com/ 3.............................. 3.............................. 4.3 4................... 5.4........................ 6.5........................ 8.6...........................7
More informationHanbury-Brown Twiss (ver. 2.0) van Cittert - Zernike mutual coherence
Hanbury-Brown Twiss (ver. 2.) 25 4 4 1 2 2 2 2.1 van Cittert - Zernike..................................... 2 2.2 mutual coherence................................. 4 3 Hanbury-Brown Twiss ( ) 5 3.1............................................
More information1 1.1 H = µc i c i + c i t ijc j + 1 c i c j V ijklc k c l (1) V ijkl = V jikl = V ijlk = V jilk () t ij = t ji, V ijkl = V lkji (3) (1) V 0 H mf = µc
013 6 30 BCS 1 1.1........................ 1................................ 3 1.3............................ 3 1.4............................... 5 1.5.................................... 5 6 3 7 4 8
More information1 st 2 nd Dec
2 12 1 2 2 1 st 2 nd Dec.2007 2 1 st 2 nd Dec.2007 1 3 1 st 2 nd Dec.2007 1 2 1 2 1. 2. (2004) 3. 3 4 3 1 2 1. 2. 3 1. 2. 3. 4 4 1 2 5 1 2 6 4 1 st 2 nd Dec.2007 5 1 st 2 nd Dec.2007 1 10 (2004) 4 120
More information,398 4% 017,
6 3 JEL Classification: D4; K39; L86,,., JSPS 34304, 47301.. 1 01301 79 1 7,398 4% 017,390 01 013 1 1 01 011 514 8 1 Novos and Waldman (1984) Johnson (1985) Chen and Png (003) Arai (011) 3 1 4 3 4 5 0
More informationOHP.dvi
t 0, X X t x t 0 t u u = x X (1) t t 0 u X x O 1 1 t 0 =0 X X +dx t x(x,t) x(x +dx,t). dx dx = x(x +dx,t) x(x,t) (2) dx, dx = F dx (3). F (deformation gradient tensor) t F t 0 dx dx X x O 2 2 F. (det F
More information[] Tle () i ( ) e . () [].....[], ..i.et.. N Z, I Q R C N Z Q R C R i R {,,} N A B X N Z Q R,, c,,, c, A, B, C, L, y, z,, X, L pq p q def f () lim f ( ) f ( ) ( ), p p q r q r p q r p q r c c,, f ( )
More informationGrushin 2MA16039T
Grushin 2MA1639T 3 2 2 R d Borel α i k (x, bi (x, 1 i d, 1 k N d N α R d b α = α(x := (αk(x i 1 i d, 1 k N b = b(x := (b i (x 1 i d X = (X t t x R d dx t = α(x t db t + b(x t dt ( 3 u t = Au + V u, u(,
More informationy = x x R = 0. 9, R = σ $ = y x w = x y x x w = x y α ε = + β + x x x y α ε = + β + γ x + x x x x' = / x y' = y/ x y' =
y x = α + β + ε =,, ε V( ε) = E( ε ) = σ α $ $ β w ( 0) σ = w σ σ y α x ε = + β + w w w w ε / w ( w y x α β ) = α$ $ W = yw βwxw $β = W ( W) ( W)( W) w x x w x x y y = = x W y W x y x y xw = y W = w w
More informationuntitled
* 2001 (B) ** 113-0033 7-3-1 TEL(03)5841-5641FAX(03)5841-5521iwamoto@e.u-tokyo.ac.jp 1990 1990 1 2 3 1 (2002) 2 social infrastructure social capital Woolcook (1998) 3-1 - - 2 - 1990 Mera (1973) G Cobb-Douglas
More informationn ξ n,i, i = 1,, n S n ξ n,i n 0 R 1,.. σ 1 σ i .10.14.15 0 1 0 1 1 3.14 3.18 3.19 3.14 3.14,. ii 1 1 1.1..................................... 1 1............................... 3 1.3.........................
More information財政赤字の経済分析:中長期的視点からの考察
1998 1999 1998 1999 10 10 1999 30 (1982, 1996) (1997) (1977) (1990) (1996) (1997) (1996) Ihori, Doi, and Kondo (1999) (1982) (1984) (1987) (1993) (1997) (1998) CAPM 1980 (time inconsistency) Persson, Persson
More informationchap9.dvi
9 AR (i) (ii) MA (iii) (iv) (v) 9.1 2 1 AR 1 9.1.1 S S y j = (α i + β i j) D ij + η j, η j = ρ S η j S + ε j (j =1,,T) (1) i=1 {ε j } i.i.d(,σ 2 ) η j (j ) D ij j i S 1 S =1 D ij =1 S>1 S =4 (1) y j =
More information( )
7..-8..8.......................................................................... 4.................................... 3...................................... 3..3.................................. 4.3....................................
More informationMicrosoft Word - Šv”|“Å‘I.DOC
90 ª ª * E-mailshinobu.nakagawa@boj.or.jp i ii iii iv SNA 1 70 80 2 80 90 80 80 90 1 80 90 98 6 1 1 SNA 2 1 SNA 80 1SNA 1 19931998 1 2-190 1,2 2 2-2 2-3,4 3 2-5 4 2030 2-3 3 2-15 97 20 90 2-15 9198 1.
More informationNo δs δs = r + δr r = δr (3) δs δs = r r = δr + u(r + δr, t) u(r, t) (4) δr = (δx, δy, δz) u i (r + δr, t) u i (r, t) = u i x j δx j (5) δs 2
No.2 1 2 2 δs δs = r + δr r = δr (3) δs δs = r r = δr + u(r + δr, t) u(r, t) (4) δr = (δx, δy, δz) u i (r + δr, t) u i (r, t) = u i δx j (5) δs 2 = δx i δx i + 2 u i δx i δx j = δs 2 + 2s ij δx i δx j
More informationX G P G (X) G BG [X, BG] S 2 2 2 S 2 2 S 2 = { (x 1, x 2, x 3 ) R 3 x 2 1 + x 2 2 + x 2 3 = 1 } R 3 S 2 S 2 v x S 2 x x v(x) T x S 2 T x S 2 S 2 x T x S 2 = { ξ R 3 x ξ } R 3 T x S 2 S 2 x x T x S 2
More information( ) Loewner SLE 13 February
( ) Loewner SLE 3 February 00 G. F. Lawler, Conformally Invariant Processes in the Plane, (American Mathematical Society, 005)., Summer School 009 (009 8 7-9 ) . d- (BES d ) d B t = (Bt, B t,, Bd t ) (d
More informationKroneher Levi-Civita 1 i = j δ i j = i j 1 if i jk is an even permutation of 1,2,3. ε i jk = 1 if i jk is an odd permutation of 1,2,3. otherwise. 3 4
[2642 ] Yuji Chinone 1 1-1 ρ t + j = 1 1-1 V S ds ds Eq.1 ρ t + j dv = ρ t dv = t V V V ρdv = Q t Q V jdv = j ds V ds V I Q t + j ds = ; S S [ Q t ] + I = Eq.1 2 2 Kroneher Levi-Civita 1 i = j δ i j =
More information.2 ρ dv dt = ρk grad p + 3 η grad (divv) + η 2 v.3 divh = 0, rote + c H t = 0 dive = ρ, H = 0, E = ρ, roth c E t = c ρv E + H c t = 0 H c E t = c ρv T
NHK 204 2 0 203 2 24 ( ) 7 00 7 50 203 2 25 ( ) 7 00 7 50 203 2 26 ( ) 7 00 7 50 203 2 27 ( ) 7 00 7 50 I. ( ν R n 2 ) m 2 n m, R = e 2 8πε 0 hca B =.09737 0 7 m ( ν = ) λ a B = 4πε 0ħ 2 m e e 2 = 5.2977
More information橡DP9802.PDF
21 Japan s Labor Force in the Year 2020 2020 2020 600 30 60 65 30 21 20 20 2020 2020 (1) 1 (2) (3) 1 1992 9 2025 2025 1997 1 2050 10 2050-1 - consensus estimate 21 (1995) (1997) (estimation) calibration
More information高知工科大学電子 光システム工学科
卒業研究報告 題 目 量子力学に基づいた水素分子の分子軌道法的取り扱いと Hamiltonian 近似法 指導教員 山本哲也 報告者 山中昭徳 平成 14 年 月 5 日 高知工科大学電子 光システム工学科. 3. 4.1 4. 4.3 4.5 6.6 8.7 10.8 11.9 1.10 1 3. 13 3.113 3. 13 3.3 13 3.4 14 3.5 15 3.6 15 3.7 17
More information006 11 8 0 3 1 5 1.1..................... 5 1......................... 6 1.3.................... 6 1.4.................. 8 1.5................... 8 1.6................... 10 1.6.1......................
More information) a + b = i + 6 b c = 6i j ) a = 0 b = c = 0 ) â = i + j 0 ˆb = 4) a b = b c = j + ) cos α = cos β = 6) a ˆb = b ĉ = 0 7) a b = 6i j b c = i + 6j + 8)
4 4 ) a + b = i + 6 b c = 6i j ) a = 0 b = c = 0 ) â = i + j 0 ˆb = 4) a b = b c = j + ) cos α = cos β = 6) a ˆb = b ĉ = 0 7) a b = 6i j b c = i + 6j + 8) a b a b = 6i j 4 b c b c 9) a b = 4 a b) c = 7
More information3/4/8:9 { } { } β β β α β α β β
α β : α β β α β α, [ ] [ ] V, [ ] α α β [ ] β 3/4/8:9 3/4/8:9 { } { } β β β α β α β β [] β [] β β β β α ( ( ( ( ( ( [ ] [ ] [ β ] [ α β β ] [ α ( β β ] [ α] [ ( β β ] [] α [ β β ] ( / α α [ β β ] [ ] 3
More information21 2 26 i 1 1 1.1............................ 1 1.2............................ 3 2 9 2.1................... 9 2.2.......... 9 2.3................... 11 2.4....................... 12 3 15 3.1..........
More informationuntitled
- k k k = y. k = ky. y du dx = ε ux ( ) ux ( ) = ax+ b x u() = ; u( ) = AE u() = b= u () = a= ; a= d x du ε x = = = dx dx N = σ da = E ε da = EA ε A x A x x - σ x σ x = Eε x N = EAε x = EA = N = EA k =
More information2016 B S option) call option) put option) Chicago Board Option Exchange;CBOE) F.Black M.Scholes Option Pricing Model;OPM) B S 1
206 B S option) call option) put option) 7 973 Chicago Board Option Exchange;CBOE) F.Black M.Scholes Option Pricing Model;OPM) B S 997 Robert Merton A 20 00 30 00 50 00 50 30 20 S, max(0, S-) C max(0,s
More information第5章 偏微分方程式の境界値問題
October 5, 2018 1 / 113 4 ( ) 2 / 113 Poisson 5.1 Poisson ( A.7.1) Poisson Poisson 1 (A.6 ) Γ p p N u D Γ D b 5.1.1: = Γ D Γ N 3 / 113 Poisson 5.1.1 d {2, 3} Lipschitz (A.5 ) Γ D Γ N = \ Γ D Γ p Γ N Γ
More informationkeisoku01.dvi
2.,, Mon, 2006, 401, SAGA, JAPAN Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Saga Univ., JAPAN 4 Mon, 2006, 401, SAGA, JAPAN Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Saga Univ., JAPAN 5 Mon, 2006, 401, SAGA, JAPAN Dept.
More information1 Nelson-Siegel Nelson and Siegel(1987) 3 Nelson-Siegel 3 Nelson-Siegel 2 3 Nelson-Siegel 2 Nelson-Siegel Litterman and Scheinkman(199
Nelson-Siegel Nelson-Siegel 1992 2007 15 1 Nelson and Siegel(1987) 2 FF VAR 1996 FF B) 1 Nelson-Siegel 15 90 1 Nelson and Siegel(1987) 3 Nelson-Siegel 3 Nelson-Siegel 2 3 Nelson-Siegel 2 Nelson-Siegel
More information24 I ( ) 1. R 3 (i) C : x 2 + y 2 1 = 0 (ii) C : y = ± 1 x 2 ( 1 x 1) (iii) C : x = cos t, y = sin t (0 t 2π) 1.1. γ : [a, b] R n ; t γ(t) = (x
24 I 1.1.. ( ) 1. R 3 (i) C : x 2 + y 2 1 = 0 (ii) C : y = ± 1 x 2 ( 1 x 1) (iii) C : x = cos t, y = sin t (0 t 2π) 1.1. γ : [a, b] R n ; t γ(t) = (x 1 (t), x 2 (t),, x n (t)) ( ) ( ), γ : (i) x 1 (t),
More informationver Web
ver201723 Web 1 4 11 4 12 5 13 7 2 9 21 9 22 10 23 10 24 11 3 13 31 n 13 32 15 33 21 34 25 35 (1) 27 4 30 41 30 42 32 43 36 44 (2) 38 45 45 46 45 5 46 51 46 52 48 53 49 54 51 55 54 56 58 57 (3) 61 2 3
More informationuntitled
IV 1 IV 2 (i) 2 0.13 0.23 1 (i) 3 ( 0.11 0.19 0.5% 2 (ii) 1% (ii) 1,000, 1,000 (1 Q) G A 0.02 {e i ) 1} Q (e 5 1) 0.02 β Ρ (iii) 1 1 QG {e ig ( i G ) 1} QG (e 5 1) Ρ e in e i G n Q e in 1 e i G n 1 1 1
More informationdvipsj.8449.dvi
9 1 9 9.1 9 2 (1) 9.1 9.2 σ a = σ Y FS σ a : σ Y : σ b = M I c = M W FS : M : I : c : = σ b
More informationUntitled
II 14 14-7-8 8/4 II (http://www.damp.tottori-u.ac.jp/~ooshida/edu/fluid/) [ (3.4)] Navier Stokes [ 6/ ] Navier Stokes 3 [ ] Reynolds [ (4.6), (45.8)] [ p.186] Navier Stokes I 1 balance law t (ρv i )+ j
More informationx,, z v = (, b, c) v v 2 + b 2 + c 2 x,, z 1 i = (1, 0, 0), j = (0, 1, 0), k = (0, 0, 1) v 1 = ( 1, b 1, c 1 ), v 2 = ( 2, b 2, c 2 ) v
12 -- 1 4 2009 9 4-1 4-2 4-3 4-4 4-5 4-6 4-7 4-8 4-9 4-10 c 2011 1/(13) 4--1 2009 9 3 x,, z v = (, b, c) v v 2 + b 2 + c 2 x,, z 1 i = (1, 0, 0), j = (0, 1, 0), k = (0, 0, 1) v 1 = ( 1, b 1, c 1 ), v 2
More information研究シリーズ第40号
165 PEN WPI CPI WAGE IIP Feige and Pearce 166 167 168 169 Vector Autoregression n (z) z z p p p zt = φ1zt 1 + φ2zt 2 + + φ pzt p + t Cov( 0 ε t, ε t j )= Σ for for j 0 j = 0 Cov( ε t, zt j ) = 0 j = >
More information医系の統計入門第 2 版 サンプルページ この本の定価 判型などは, 以下の URL からご覧いただけます. このサンプルページの内容は, 第 2 版 1 刷発行時のものです.
医系の統計入門第 2 版 サンプルページ この本の定価 判型などは, 以下の URL からご覧いただけます. http://www.morikita.co.jp/books/mid/009192 このサンプルページの内容は, 第 2 版 1 刷発行時のものです. i 2 t 1. 2. 3 2 3. 6 4. 7 5. n 2 ν 6. 2 7. 2003 ii 2 2013 10 iii 1987
More informationchap10.dvi
. q {y j } I( ( L y j =Δy j = u j = C l ε j l = C(L ε j, {ε j } i.i.d.(,i q ( l= y O p ( {u j } q {C l } A l C l
More information2 1,2, , 2 ( ) (1) (2) (3) (4) Cameron and Trivedi(1998) , (1987) (1982) Agresti(2003)
3 1 1 1 2 1 2 1,2,3 1 0 50 3000, 2 ( ) 1 3 1 0 4 3 (1) (2) (3) (4) 1 1 1 2 3 Cameron and Trivedi(1998) 4 1974, (1987) (1982) Agresti(2003) 3 (1)-(4) AAA, AA+,A (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (1)-(5) 1 2 5 3 5 (DI)
More informationQMII_10.dvi
65 1 1.1 1.1.1 1.1 H H () = E (), (1.1) H ν () = E ν () ν (). (1.) () () = δ, (1.3) μ () ν () = δ(μ ν). (1.4) E E ν () E () H 1.1: H α(t) = c (t) () + dνc ν (t) ν (), (1.5) H () () + dν ν () ν () = 1 (1.6)
More information微分積分 サンプルページ この本の定価 判型などは, 以下の URL からご覧いただけます. このサンプルページの内容は, 初版 1 刷発行時のものです.
微分積分 サンプルページ この本の定価 判型などは, 以下の URL からご覧いただけます. ttp://www.morikita.co.jp/books/mid/00571 このサンプルページの内容は, 初版 1 刷発行時のものです. i ii 014 10 iii [note] 1 3 iv 4 5 3 6 4 x 0 sin x x 1 5 6 z = f(x, y) 1 y = f(x)
More informationuntitled
Horioka Nakagawa and Oshima u ( c ) t+ 1 E β (1 + r ) 1 = t i+ 1 u ( c ) t 0 β c t y t uc ( t ) E () t r t c E β t ct γ ( + r ) 1 0 t+ 1 1 = t+ 1 ξ ct + β ct γ c t + 1 1+ r ) E β t + 1 t ct (1
More information3 m = [n, n1, n 2,..., n r, 2n] p q = [n, n 1, n 2,..., n r ] p 2 mq 2 = ±1 1 1 6 1.1................................. 6 1.2......................... 8 1.3......................... 13 2 15 2.1.............................
More information20 6 4 1 4 1.1 1.................................... 4 1.1.1.................................... 4 1.1.2 1................................ 5 1.2................................... 7 1.2.1....................................
More information128 3 II S 1, S 2 Φ 1, Φ 2 Φ 1 = { B( r) n( r)}ds S 1 Φ 2 = { B( r) n( r)}ds (3.3) S 2 S S 1 +S 2 { B( r) n( r)}ds = 0 (3.4) S 1, S 2 { B( r) n( r)}ds
127 3 II 3.1 3.1.1 Φ(t) ϕ em = dφ dt (3.1) B( r) Φ = { B( r) n( r)}ds (3.2) S S n( r) Φ 128 3 II S 1, S 2 Φ 1, Φ 2 Φ 1 = { B( r) n( r)}ds S 1 Φ 2 = { B( r) n( r)}ds (3.3) S 2 S S 1 +S 2 { B( r) n( r)}ds
More informationSuper perfect numbers and Mersenne perefect numbers /2/22 1 m, , 31 8 P = , P =
Super perfect numbers and Mersenne perefect numbers 3 2019/2/22 1 m, 2 2 5 3 5 4 18 5 20 6 25 7, 31 8 P = 5 35 9, 38 10 P = 5 39 1 1 m, 1: m = 28 m = 28 m = 10 height48 2 4 3 A 40 2 3 5 A 2002 2 7 11 13
More information( ) ,
II 2007 4 0. 0 1 0 2 ( ) 0 3 1 2 3 4, - 5 6 7 1 1 1 1 1) 2) 3) 4) ( ) () H 2.79 10 10 He 2.72 10 9 C 1.01 10 7 N 3.13 10 6 O 2.38 10 7 Ne 3.44 10 6 Mg 1.076 10 6 Si 1 10 6 S 5.15 10 5 Ar 1.01 10 5 Fe 9.00
More informationuntitled
17 5 13 1 2 1.1... 2 1.2... 2 1.3... 3 2 3 2.1... 3 2.2... 5 3 6 3.1... 6 3.2... 7 3.3 t... 7 3.4 BC a... 9 3.5... 10 4 11 1 1 θ n ˆθ. ˆθ, ˆθ, ˆθ.,, ˆθ.,.,,,. 1.1 ˆθ σ 2 = E(ˆθ E ˆθ) 2 b = E(ˆθ θ). Y 1,,Y
More information