.... APU.

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download ".... APU."

みいかはなだて
5 years ago
Views:

1 , COE

2 .... APU.

3 APU APU APU APU Research in Progress Seminar APU ( 30 2 (24) 3 () () () ()

4 APU APU (APU APU APU APU APU APU APU APU

5 Doctor Ph.D D.Ed.D.B.A D.Eng Doctor of Philosophy(Ph.D) Doctorats Ph.D. complementary examinationcomprehensive examinationqualifying examination doctoral candidate U.S.News & World Report complementary examination / dissertators

6 APU APU APU *..

8 APU APU APU APU APU

9 APU APU APU A B C D E

10 APU APU APU 週 5 回週 4 回週 3 回週 2 回週回月に 2 回程度セメスターに数回程度他無回答 2% 2% 5% 5 4% % % 2% 2% 5% 週回以上研究指導を受けている学生が 5 割満足度も高い十分ではないと回答した学生は月に 2 回程度セメスターに数回程度の指導状況十分である少な目だが十分である普通十分ではない無回答 n=

11 2 n= n= Research in Progress Seminar APU 2 回 6 (4%) 3 回 3 (7%) 回 6 (4%) 4 回 2 (5%) 無回答 4 (9%) なし 9 (44%) 5 回以上 3 (7%) 回生 (26%) 回生不明 2 (5%) 2 回生 4 (9%) 3 回生 (2%) 4 回生以上 (2%) 回 3 (7%) 2 回 9 (2%) 3 回 2 (5%) 4 回 (2%) 無回答 4 (9%) なし 2 (49%) 5 回以上 3 (7%) 回生 3 (30%) 回生不明 (2%) 2 回生 5 (2%) 3 回生 2 (5%) n= n= 本 4 (9%) 2 本 7 (6%) 3 本 5 (2%) 無回答 3 (7%) 4 本 (2%) なし 2 (49%) 5 本以上 2 (5%) 回生 (26%) 2 回生 7 (6%) 回生不明 (2%) 3 回生 2 (5%) 無回答 6 (38%) あり 3 (30%) なし 4 (33%) 2 回生 2 (5%) 回生 6 (4%) 3 回生 (2%) 4 回生以上 4 (9%) 回生不明 (2%) n= n=

12 APU APU 博士後期課程学生が学位取得に有効と考える取組み複数指導体制 ( コミッティ制度 ) 62% 国外での研究発表 52% 国内での研究発表 ( 学内発表含む ) 48% 論文発表 ( 査読付論文等 ) 43% アカデミックライティング指導 36% 学外教員研究者による研究指導 29% 英語エディティング支援 24% 中間報告会 ( 回生終了時など ) 9% 学部修士課程開講科目の履修 0% 0% 0% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 国外での研究発表や国内での発表論文発表 ( 査読付論文 ) について約 4 から 5 割の学生は学位取得のために必要と回答しているが (2) の調査結果に表れているように実際に発表を行っている学生はそれぞれの項目 ( 国内発表国外での発表等 ) において約半数である発表を促進する仕掛けが必要である

13 APU APU APU A APU APU

15 a) ) ) ) e) e Editing Process Assessment SheetPASS APU APU

16 APU APU APU URLhttp:// b_menu/toukei///index.htm

17 ..,,, req.php

18 Construction of a Management System for the Award Process of International Standard Doctoral (Humanities and Social Sciences / Coursework) Degrees MIYOSHI, Maki (Assistant Administrative Manager, Academic Office, Ritsumeikan Asia Pacific University) SHIMA, Keiko (Lecturer, Research Center for Higher Education Administration) KIDA, Naruya (Deputy Director, Ritsumeikan Asia Pacific University) ABE, Yasuharu (Administrative Manager, Academic Office, Ritsumeikan Asia Pacific University) Graduate school, doctoral course, doctorates in the humanities and social sciences obtained by completing a doctoral course, substantiation of graduate education, graduate school curriculum, degree award process management Graduate schools are currently both expanding in size and diversity, and graduate education must both be made more substantial and its quality guaranteed. This paper focuses on doctoral courses in the humanities and social sciences, for which the rate of degree conferral within the standard term of study (three years) is low and the process leading up to the award of a degree is unclear, and explores efforts to promote the conferral of high-quality doctoral degrees and ways of supporting such efforts. Through analysis of American and Japanese degree systems, graduate school doctoral course curricula, and hearings and surveys of teaching staff and students, this paper proposes the following factors as required to ensure quality: () review of admission requirements, (2) determination of requirements for doctoral thesis submission, and (3) clarification of the degree award process. For clarification of the degree award process, presenting a clear degree award process map will enable students and faculty to obtain and share an objective grasp of the research progress. This will enable appropriate guidance and assistance to be offered throughout the university, leading to the promotion of the conferral of high-quality doctorates.

PDCA

PDCA PDCA / / -- -- -- -- -- -- % % --- --- - No.--- --- --- A B C D + + + + + + + + + A B C D........................ --- OJT PDCA Eliminate Combine ECRS Rearrange Simplify -- - BKC IT BKC BKC APU -- :