Y X X Y1 X 2644 Y1 Y2 Y1 Y3 Y1 Y1 Y1 Y2 Y3 Y2 Y3 Y1 Y1 Y2 Y3 Y1 Y2 Y3 Y1 X Lexis X Y X X2 X3 X2 Y2 Y1 Y1

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "Y X X Y1 X 2644 Y1 Y2 Y1 Y3 Y1 Y1 Y1 Y2 Y3 Y2 Y3 Y1 Y1 Y2 Y3 Y1 Y2 Y3 Y1 X Lexis X Y X X2 X3 X2 Y2 Y1 Y1"

こごろうおおかわち
5 years ago
Views:

1 2 20 I II III IV Makiko Noto / Y autumn / No.393

2 Y X X Y1 X 2644 Y1 Y2 Y1 Y3 Y1 Y1 Y1 Y2 Y3 Y2 Y3 Y1 Y1 Y2 Y3 Y1 Y2 Y3 Y1 X Lexis X Y X X2 X3 X2 Y2 Y1 Y1 X X Y1 Y Y X Y1 Y2 Y1X Y1 X Y1 X Y1 X 100 X2 X3 30 Y2 X X Y1 Y1 X Y1 Y2 X 4 A

3 A Y1 AY2 A Y3 A Y4 A X A A X A X A 1106 Y1 A B X A 5 X Y1 Y1 Y1 Y2 X X Y3 Y4 X X autumn / No.393

4 053 2 X Y1 ATM 110 Y1 110 ATM Y1 ATM X Y1 Y2 Y3 X Lexis Y1 5 Y X Y1 Y2 8 Y1 376 Y2 Y1 3 Y2 5 Y2 Y a Lexis Y1 X1 X1 Y1 Y2 Y1 Y3 Y1 Y2 Y3 Y1 X Y X1 Y1 X1 100 X1 X2 50 X3 X7 10 X Y2 Y3 Y2 Y3 Y1 X1 Y1 Y1 5 X1 Y2 Y3 Y1 25 X1Y X F F

5 autumn / No.393 Y1 D Y1 Y2 Y2 Y3 Y4 Y1 Y1 3 Y41 Y2 Y X Y Y2 Y3 Y4 2 2 X 3 X D Y4 Y1 5 Y1 1 Y Y2 Y b XY1 X Y1 Y2 Y1 Y3 Y Y X X Y2 Y3 Y2 X Y2 Y3 Y2 Y3 Y1 Y Lexis X Y Lexis X A Y2A X Y2 X Y3 Y2 Y1 Y2 A Y2Y3 X 5 Y XY1 Y1 Y2454

6 Y Y1 X 1 Y2 Y Y2 Y3 Y1 Y1 X Y2 Y3 Y1 X Y1 Y2 Y3 Y1 Y1 X X X Y1 X Y1 Y2 Y3 X Y2 Y3 Y1 Y1 X Y2 Y3 Y2 Y3 Y a X Y1 A X X Y1 Y2 Y3Y X Y2 Y1 X Y2 Y Y2

7 Y2 Y3 Y1 X Y1 Y2 Y3 5 Y1 4 Y2 Y3 Y Lexis X Y1 A A X Y1 Y2 Y1Y3 Y1 Y4 Y1 Y5 Y Y2 Y3 Y1 X X Y1 Y1X Y A 499 A X 100 AX Y1 A A X X Y1A A X X Y1 Y2 Y3 Y2 Y3 Y Lexis X B 4370 B Y BB X A16 4 A X X1 A X2 Y B X2 A A B X autumn / No.393

8 057 2 B X1 X2 YB X1 X2 Y B BX Y5 X b X Y1 4 X 5Y1 Y2 Y Y X Y2 X 5000 Y Lexis X Y1 Y2 Y1 Y1 B D E X 8 Y1 9

9 X 664 XA Y1 Y1 X Y1 B 682 A X X Y Y2 Y1 Y2 Y Lexis X Y X Y1 A Y1 Y2 A Y3 A Y27000 Y Y X A Y1 A A Y2 A A A Y2 Y3 A X A 117Y2 Y Y2 X Y Y2 2 1 X Y Lexis X Y1 Y1 Y2 Y1 Y3 Y1 Y X Y2 Y3 X 5 Y1 X X Y1 Y1 440 Y2 X autumn / No.393

10 059 2 Y2 Y1X Lexis 812 X Y1 Y2 Y % IV 1A 1B 27 1A C A B

11 B = autumn / No.393

12 B

13 d = d / b = d / c % 1 0 0% % 50% % 54% % 1% % 31% % 20% % 1% % 28% % 3% % % 100% % 24% % 100% 4 0 0% 0% % % 100% bc d / autumn / No.393

14 C B 3 b B 3 a B B B 2 b C A B A Lexis Lexis 4B Lexis 1A Lexis 4B Lexis 4B 2 a Lexis 4B Lexis 1C Lexis 2A Lexis 2B Lexis 1C Lexis 1A Lexis 4B Lexis 2A Lexis 1C Lexis 2A Lexis 1B Lexis 4B Lexis 4B 3 a Lexis 2B Lexis 4B 2 b B 2 a C Lexis 4B 3 a Lexis 1C A A B

15 Judicial Decisions on Fidelity Guarantee (2) A Study through Judicial Decisions in the Last Twenty Years Makiko Noto In this paper I took up and examined judicial decisions on fidelity guarantee (Mimoto-Hosho) in the last twenty years. In the part (2) of the paper, I reviewed judicial decisions on the term and effect of fidelity guarantee contracts and pointed out the issues of current fidelity guarantee contracts. A guarantor is released from the obligation to pay reparations based on a fidelity guarantee contract after the elapse of a predetermined period of time or by the end of the employment relationship before the elapse of the predetermined period. However, a fidelity guarantee contract sometimes continues for a long period by updating it, and the fidelity guarantee contract for a long-term employee is concluded. Usage like this may be contrary to its institutional meaning. The determination method of a guarantor s responsibility is unique. The existence or nonexistence of the liability of a guarantor and the amount of damage to pay are at the discretion of the court (Fidelity Guarantee Act, Article 5). Unlike other regular contracts, the contents of the obligation which a guarantor undertakes in a fidelity guarantee contract are not decided by the contractual agreement between an employer and a guarantor. Therefore, the problem arises that it is hard for a guarantor to foresee the result after the passage of time. Human relations like family, the work environment, and the awareness of contracts and/ or the law have greatly changed since the enforcement of the Fidelity Guarantee Act. The Legislative Council of the Ministry of Justice decided to establish a working group in 2009, and now it keeps on deliberating the revision of the Civil Code (law of obligations), which is the basic law. By contrast, the Fidelity Guarantee Act, which is a special law, needs to be reexamined more intensely in response to changes in society. The time when we should revise the framework of the Fidelity Guarantee is fast approaching. 064 THE HIKONE RONSO 2012 autumn / No.393

16 Judicial Decisions on Fidelity Guarantee (2) Makiko Noto 065

II A LexisNexis JP 80, /03/

II A LexisNexis JP 80, /03/ 1 20 I II III 1 2 3 4 IV I Makiko Noto / 1 1933 8 2 2004 16 3 1 1963 101 118 11 1965 291 332 2 4 1985 247 262 3 446 2 3 465 2 465 5 2004 16= 2005 2005 004 2012 summer / No.392 3 4 5 80 6 7 5 20 8 II A