subsequent reference position Stivers formal Sacks & Schegloff Sacks & Schegloff Ford & Fox Hayashi Fox Schegloff Stivers referential Stivers CallHome

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "subsequent reference position Stivers formal Sacks & Schegloff Sacks & Schegloff Ford & Fox Hayashi Fox Schegloff Stivers referential Stivers CallHome"

たけなりこのえ
5 years ago
Views:

1 deictic expression cf. Fillmore, Lyons Levinson CallHome Japanese hhhh hhh h hhhh hh.hh h hhahhaha a ta reuse adjacency pairs Schegloff

2 subsequent reference position Stivers formal Sacks & Schegloff Sacks & Schegloff Ford & Fox Hayashi Fox Schegloff Stivers referential Stivers CallHome Japanese Linguistic Data Consortium

3 CallHome Japanese hh hh hh u- hhhh hhhh h hhhh hh.hh h hhahhaha a ta he hh hhahhaha hohoho hhe hehehhhh hh n huhe hhh he he hehe hh ha haha hahahahahe h h hh hh h hh h h he hhhh.h hehe ha hahahahahahahaha hhhe hha hhaha hhh h ha hehahaha ha hah hhehaha ha ha hahaha hahahahh hh hh aha hh hh

4 B TCU turn construction unit LHHH

5 hhhh hh hhh hhahhaha a ta hohoho CallHome Japanese

6 hhh hh hh hh hha hha hhh hhh ahaha hhh h hh hh hhhh hh hhh huhu hh hh hhh hhe hh TCU side-sequence

7 h hh hh h

8 Wheatley Barbara Nasayo Kaneko Megumi Kobayashi

9 hh hh - - Fillmore, Charles J. (1975) Lectures on Deixis. Reproduced by CSLI, Stanford. Ford, Cecilia and Barbara Fox (1996). Interactional Motivations for Reference Formulation: He had. This guy had a beautiful, thirty-two Olds. In B. A. Fox (ed.) Studies in Anaphora, pp , John Benjamins, Amsterdam/ Philadelphia. Fox, Barabara. A. (1987). Discourse Structure and Anaphora: Written and Conversational English. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Hayashi, Makoto (2005). Referential Problems and Turn Construction, Text 25(4), Lee, Duck-Young and Yoko Yonezawa (2008). The Role of the Overt Expression of First and Second Person Subject in Japanese, Journal of Pragmatics 40, Levinson, Stephen C. (1983) Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Lyons, John (1977). Semantics 2. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Naruoka, Keiko (2008). Expressive Function of Japanese Adnominal Demonstrative Konna/Sonna/Anna. In Hudson, M. E., S. A. Jun &P. Sells (eds.) Japanese/Korean Linguistics 13, pp CSLI,

10 Stanford. Sacks, Harvey and Emanuel A. Schegloff (1979). Two Preferences in the Organization of References to Persons in Conversation and their Interaction, In G. Psathas, (ed.) Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, pp , Irvington, New York. Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1996). Some Practices for Referring to Persons in Talk-in-Interaction: A Partial Sketch of a Systematics, In B. A. Fox(ed.) Studies in Anaphora, pp , John Benjamins, Amsterdam/ Philadelphia. Stivers, Tanya (2007). Alternative Recognitionals in Person Reference. In Enfield, N. J. and Tanya Stivers (eds.) Person Reference in Interaction: Linguistic, Cultural and Social Perspectives, pp Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Stivers, Tanya, N. J. Enfield and Stephen C. Levinson (2007). Person Reference in Interaction. In Enfield, N. J. and Tanya Stivers (eds.) Person Reference in Interaction: Linguistic, Cultural and Social Perspectives, pp Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. - - Wheatley, Barbara, Nasayo Naneko & Megumi Kobayashi ( ). CallHome Japanese Transcripts. Linguistic Data Consortium, Philadelphia.

11 On the Reuse of Deictic Expressions in Japanese Conversation SUGA Ayumi This paper deals with a marked phenomenon of person reference, what I call the reuse of deictic expressions. In Japanese conversation there are cases where the speaker intends to refer to a person with the same deictic expression that has been used by the previous speaker. For instance, in the following interaction, the first speaker B uses a first-person deictic expression watakushi to refer to the speaker B herself. On the other hand, the second speaker A uses the same expression to refer to the same referent that the previous speaker has referred to, i.e. the previous speaker B. I OBJ how do Q QT think I wonder what to do. (1) I TOP follow-come must I (=B) must come. The purpose of this paper is to discuss what is being done by this particular type of reference through the analysis of data extracted from the corpus of telephone conversation CallHome Japanese, especially focused on the indexical nature of deictic expressions. We assume that the referential form selected by the first speaker itself is a marked form and thus encourages the second speaker s reuse of the form of the deictic expression. We can observe that the second speaker s turn consists of the elements with the two different speakers points of view. Therefore the apparently grammatically incorrect use of a deictic expression invites laughter between participants in conversation. We can also observe that the speaker reuses a deictic expression to perform the intended activities without being committed to the previous speaker s point of view. The implication of this study is to describe a phenomenon where the first speaker s referential action can affect the next speaker s referential action. This phenomenon suggests that reference is an action which makes a contribution to socially interactive activities.

A Study on Interruptions in the Conversations: To Demonstrate the Features of the Conver sation between Japanese Native Speakers and Chinese Japanese

A Study on Interruptions in the Conversations: To Demonstrate the Features of the Conver sation between Japanese Native Speakers and Chinese Japanese Learners LIU Jiajun This study aims to investigate