Evaluation of a SATOYAMA Forest Using a Voluntary Labor Supply Curve Version: c 2003 Taku Terawaki, Akio Muranaka URL: http

And Business

Discussion Papers In Economics And Business Discussion Paper 03-06 Graduate School of Economics and Osaka School of International Public Policy (OSIPP) Osaka University, Toyonaka, Osaka 560-0043, JAPAN

J. JILA 64 (5), 2001

Comparison of the Value of Outdoor Recreation: A Case Study Applying Travel Cost Method and Contingent Valuation Method Yasushi SHOJI J. JILA 64 (5), 2001 J. JILA 64 (5), 2001 2) Trice, A. H. and Wood,

「スウェーデン企業におけるワーク・ライフ・バランス調査 」報告書

1 2004 12 2005 4 5 100 25 3 1 76 2 Demoskop 2 2004 11 24 30 7 2 10 1 2005 1 31 2 4 5 2 3-1-1 3-1-1 Micromediabanken 2005 1 507 1000 55.0 2 77 50 50 /CEO 36.3 37.4 18.1 3-2-1 43.0 34.4 / 17.6 3-2-2 78 79.4

CVM CVM 1 1 Revealed Preference Stated Preference CVM CVM CVM CVM NOAA 3 CVM 4 5 CVM 2.2 CVM CVM CVM2 CVM 2 Vol.3 No Spring 003

Vol.3 No.1 2000 Spring 002 intuitive CVM CVM 1 CVM CVM CVM NISHIDA, Masaru CVM 2 2.1 CVM 1 1 Revealed Preference Stated Preference CVM CVM CVM 2 2 2 CVM NOAA 3 CVM 4 5 CVM 2.2 CVM CVM CVM2 CVM 2 Vol.3

日本内科学会雑誌第102巻第4号

2 1,2, , 2 ( ) (1) (2) (3) (4) Cameron and Trivedi(1998) , (1987) (1982) Agresti(2003)

3 1 1 1 2 1 2 1,2,3 1 0 50 3000, 2 ( ) 1 3 1 0 4 3 (1) (2) (3) (4) 1 1 1 2 3 Cameron and Trivedi(1998) 4 1974, (1987) (1982) Agresti(2003) 3 (1)-(4) AAA, AA+,A (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (1)-(5) 1 2 5 3 5 (DI)

１３　劉　近藤・・／劉　近藤

ZTCM ZTCM ha UNESCO UNESCO TCM Travel Cost Method RandallCVMContingent Valuation MethodDavis CVM CVM CVM travel cost method revealed preference method Hotelling Trice and WoodClawsonTisdell weak complementaritybradford

Title 最適年金の理論 Author(s) 藤井, 隆雄 ; 林, 史明 ; 入谷, 純 ; 小黒, 一正 Citation Issue Date Type Technical Report Text Version publisher URL

Title 最適年金の理論 Author(s) 藤井, 隆雄 ; 林, 史明 ; 入谷, 純 ; 小黒, 一正 Citation Issue 2012-06 Date Type Technical Report Text Version publisher URL http://hdl.handle.net/10086/23085 Right Hitotsubashi University Repository

わが国企業による資金調達方法の選択問題

* takeshi.shimatani@boj.or.jp ** kawai@ml.me.titech.ac.jp *** naohiko.baba@boj.or.jp No.05-J-3 2005 3 103-8660 30 No.05-J-3 2005 3 1990 * E-mailtakeshi.shimatani@boj.or.jp ** E-mailkawai@ml.me.titech.ac.jp

(2004 ) 2 (A) (B) (C) 3 (1987) (1988) Shimono and Tachibanaki(1985) (2008) , % 2 (1999) (2005) 3 (2005) (2006) (2008)

,, 23 4 30 (i) (ii) (i) (ii) Negishi (1960) 2010 (2010) ( ) ( ) (2010) E-mail:fujii@econ.kobe-u.ac.jp E-mail:082e527e@stu.kobe-u.ac.jp E-mail:iritani@econ.kobe-u.ac.jp 1 1 16 (2004 ) 2 (A) (B) (C) 3 (1987)

untitled

18 1 2,000,000 2,000,000 2007 2 2 2008 3 31 (1) 6 JCOSSAR 2007pp.57-642007.6. LCC (1) (2) 2 10mm 1020 14 12 10 8 6 4 40,50,60 2 0 1998 27.5 1995 1960 40 1) 2) 3) LCC LCC LCC 1 1) Vol.42No.5pp.29-322004.5.

Auerbach and Kotlikoff(1987) (1987) (1988) 4 (2004) 5 Diamond(1965) Auerbach and Kotlikoff(1987) 1 ( ) ,

,, 2010 8 24 2010 9 14 A B C A (B Negishi(1960) (C) ( 22 3 27 ) E-mail:fujii@econ.kobe-u.ac.jp E-mail:082e527e@stu.kobe-u.ac.jp E-mail:iritani@econ.kobe-u.ac.jp 1 1 1 2 3 Auerbach and Kotlikoff(1987) (1987)

医系の統計入門第 2 版 サンプルページ この本の定価 判型などは, 以下の URL からご覧いただけます. このサンプルページの内容は, 第 2 版 1 刷発行時のものです.

医系の統計入門第 2 版 サンプルページ この本の定価 判型などは, 以下の URL からご覧いただけます. http://www.morikita.co.jp/books/mid/009192 このサンプルページの内容は, 第 2 版 1 刷発行時のものです. i 2 t 1. 2. 3 2 3. 6 4. 7 5. n 2 ν 6. 2 7. 2003 ii 2 2013 10 iii 1987

chap10.dvi

. q {y j } I( ( L y j =Δy j = u j = C l ε j l = C(L ε j, {ε j } i.i.d.(,i q ( l= y O p ( {u j } q {C l } A l C l

,398 4% 017,

6 3 JEL Classification: D4; K39; L86,,., JSPS 34304, 47301.. 1 01301 79 1 7,398 4% 017,390 01 013 1 1 01 011 514 8 1 Novos and Waldman (1984) Johnson (1985) Chen and Png (003) Arai (011) 3 1 4 3 4 5 0

y = x x R = 0. 9, R = σ $ = y x w = x y x x w = x y α ε = + β + x x x y α ε = + β + γ x + x x x x' = / x y' = y/ x y' =

y x = α + β + ε =,, ε V( ε) = E( ε ) = σ α $ $ β w ( 0) σ = w σ σ y α x ε = + β + w w w w ε / w ( w y x α β ) = α$ $ W = yw βwxw $β = W ( W) ( W)( W) w x x w x x y y = = x W y W x y x y xw = y W = w w

,, Poisson 3 3. t t y,, y n Nµ, σ 2 y i µ + ɛ i ɛ i N0, σ 2 E[y i ] µ * i y i x i y i α + βx i + ɛ i ɛ i N0, σ 2, α, β *3 y i E[y i ] α + βx i

Armitage.? SAS.2 µ, µ 2, µ 3 a, a 2, a 3 a µ + a 2 µ 2 + a 3 µ 3 µ, µ 2, µ 3 µ, µ 2, µ 3 log a, a 2, a 3 a µ + a 2 µ 2 + a 3 µ 3 µ, µ 2, µ 3 * 2 2. y t y y y Poisson y * ,, Poisson 3 3. t t y,, y n Nµ,

Twist knot orbifold Chern-Simons

Twist knot orbifold Chern-Simons 1 3 M π F : F (M) M ω = {ω ij }, Ω = {Ω ij }, cs := 1 4π 2 (ω 12 ω 13 ω 23 + ω 12 Ω 12 + ω 13 Ω 13 + ω 23 Ω 23 ) M Chern-Simons., S. Chern J. Simons, F (M) Pontrjagin 2.,

自由集会時系列part2web.key

spurious correlation spurious regression xt=xt-1+n(0,σ^2) yt=yt-1+n(0,σ^2) n=20 type1error(5%)=0.4703 no trend 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 p for r xt=xt-1+n(0,σ^2) random walk random walk variable -5 0 5 variable

COE-RES Discussion Paper Series Center of Excellence Project The Normative Evaluation and Social Choice of Contemporary Economic Systems Graduate Scho

COE-RES Discussion Paper Series Center of Excellence Project The Normative Evaluation and Social Choice of Contemporary Economic Systems Graduate School of Economics and Institute of Economic Research

03.Œk’ì

HRS KG NG-HRS NG-KG AIC Fama 1965 Mandelbrot Blattberg Gonedes t t Kariya, et. al. Nagahara ARCH EngleGARCH Bollerslev EGARCH Nelson GARCH Heynen, et. al. r n r n =σ n w n logσ n =α +βlogσ n 1 + v n w

橡表紙参照.PDF

CIRJE-J-58 X-12-ARIMA 2000 : 2001 6 How to use X-12-ARIMA2000 when you must: A Case Study of Hojinkigyo-Tokei Naoto Kunitomo Faculty of Economics, The University of Tokyo Abstract: We illustrate how to

日本内科学会雑誌第97巻第7号

日本内科学会雑誌第98巻第4号

BayesfiI‡É“ÅfiK‡È−w‘K‡Ì‡½‡ß‡ÌChow-Liu…A…‰…S…−…Y…•

1 / 21 Kruscal V : w i,j R: w i,j = w j,i i j Kruscal (w i,j 0 ) 1 E {{i, j} i, j V, i i} 2 E {} 3 while(e = ϕ) for w i,j {i, j} E 1 E E\{i, j} 2 G = (V, E {i, j}) = E E {i, j} G {i,j} E w i,j 2 / 21 w

Microsoft Word - 表紙.docx

黒住英司 [ 著 ] サピエンティア 計量経済学 訂正および練習問題解答 (206/2/2 版 ) 訂正 練習問題解答 3 .69, 3.8 4 (X i X)U i i i (X i μ x )U i ( X μx ) U i. i E [ ] (X i μ x )U i i E[(X i μ x )]E[U i ]0. i V [ ] (X i μ x )U i i 2 i j E [(X i

chap9.dvi

9 AR (i) (ii) MA (iii) (iv) (v) 9.1 2 1 AR 1 9.1.1 S S y j = (α i + β i j) D ij + η j, η j = ρ S η j S + ε j (j =1,,T) (1) i=1 {ε j } i.i.d(,σ 2 ) η j (j ) D ij j i S 1 S =1 D ij =1 S>1 S =4 (1) y j =

研究シリーズ第40号

165 PEN WPI CPI WAGE IIP Feige and Pearce 166 167 168 169 Vector Autoregression n (z) z z p p p zt = φ1zt 1 + φ2zt 2 + + φ pzt p + t Cov( 0 ε t, ε t j )= Σ for for j 0 j = 0 Cov( ε t, zt j ) = 0 j = >

seminar0220a.dvi

1 Hi-Stat 2 16 2 20 16:30-18:00 2 2 217 1 COE 4 COE RA E-MAIL: ged0104@srv.cc.hit-u.ac.jp 2004 2 25 S-PLUS S-PLUS S-PLUS S-code 2 [8] [8] [8] 1 2 ARFIMA(p, d, q) FI(d) φ(l)(1 L) d x t = θ(l)ε t ({ε t }

untitled

. x2.0 0.5 0 0.5.0 x 2 t= 0: : x α ij β j O x2 u I = α x j ij i i= 0 y j = + exp( u ) j v J = β y j= 0 j j o = + exp( v ) 0 0 e x p e x p J j I j ij i i o x β α = = = + +.. 2 3 8 x 75 58 28 36 x2 3 3 4

第3章.DOC

000 Ben-Akiva and Lerman, 1985 1996 1996 4 1997 Banister, 1978; Verplanken et al., 1998 1 5 1996 3 () (I n ) 1 18 I n n P n (1) P n ( 1) = exp exp ( Vn 1 ) I n 1 ( V ) + exp µ ln exp ( V ) n1 + i= ni (3.1)

Autumn II III Zon and Muysken 2005 Zon and Muysken 2005 IV II 障害者への所得移転の経済効果 分析に用いるデータ

212 Vol. 44 No. 2 I はじめに 2008 1 2 Autumn 08 213 II III Zon and Muysken 2005 Zon and Muysken 2005 IV II 障害者への所得移転の経済効果 17 18 1 分析に用いるデータ 1 2005 10 12 200 2 2006 9 12 1 1 2 129 35 113 3 1 2 6 1 2 3 4 4 1

18 2 20 W/C W/C W/C 4-4-1 0.05 1.0 1000 1. 1 1.1 1 1.2 3 2. 4 2.1 4 (1) 4 (2) 4 2.2 5 (1) 5 (2) 5 2.3 7 3. 8 3.1 8 3.2 ( ) 11 3.3 11 (1) 12 (2) 12 4. 14 4.1 14 4.2 14 (1) 15 (2) 16 (3) 17 4.3 17 5. 19

ii 3.,. 4. F. (), ,,. 8.,. 1. (75%) (25%) =7 20, =7 21 (. ). 1.,, (). 3.,. 1. ().,.,.,.,.,. () (12 )., (), 0. 2., 1., 0,.

24(2012) (1 C106) 4 11 (2 C206) 4 12 http://www.math.is.tohoku.ac.jp/~obata,.,,,.. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7.,,. 1., 2007 (). 2. P. G. Hoel, 1995. 3... 1... 2.,,. ii 3.,. 4. F. (),.. 5... 6.. 7.,,. 8.,. 1. (75%)

Preliminary Version Manning et al. (1986) Rand Health Insurance Experiment Manning et al. (1986) 3 Medicare Me

Preliminary Version. 600 * 14530029 12-1- Preliminary Version. 1 70 1 1997 9 1020 70 1 3 2 70 1 Manning et al. (1986) Rand Health Insurance Experiment 25 50 Manning et al. (1986) 3 Medicare Medicare Medicare

橡森林管理に対する市民の要求の評価

kuri@for.agr.hokudai.ac.p Abstract Koichi Kuriyama: The Estimation of Public Demand for the Forest Management: Contingent Ranking Study. The purpose of this paper is to argues the measurement of the public

% 30% 70% , ( 27 1 ) % 20% 3 0% 20% % 10% ( ) (5,500) (2,750)

2-12-1 Graduate School of Economics, Kyoto University, Yoshida, Sakyo, Kyoto, Japan Chikushi Jogakuen University, 2-12-1 Ishizaka, Dazaifu, Fukuoka, Japan E-mail: ida@econ.kyoto-u.ac.jp 1. 2000 3 2016

x T = (x 1,, x M ) x T x M K C 1,, C K 22 x w y 1: 2 2

Takio Kurita Neurosceince Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Indastrial Science and Technology takio-kurita@aistgojp (Support Vector Machine, SVM) 1 (Support Vector Machine, SVM) ( ) 2

201711grade1ouyou.pdf

2017 11 26 1 2 52 3 12 13 22 23 32 33 42 3 5 3 4 90 5 6 A 1 2 Web Web 3 4 1 2... 5 6 7 7 44 8 9 1 2 3 1 p p >2 2 A 1 2 0.6 0.4 0.52... (a) 0.6 0.4...... B 1 2 0.8-0.2 0.52..... (b) 0.6 0.52.... 1 A B 2

所得税と課税最低限に関する一考察

1. 2. 2.1 2.2 2.2.1 2.2.2 3. 3.1 3.2 3.3 4. 4.1 4.2 5. 1 1. 1 14 2 1985 3 1981 4 1997 5 2005 325 6 1 2005 19942000 2 http://www.mof.go.jp/singikai/zeicho/tosin/140614c.htm 3 1985p.107 4 1981p.122 5 1997p.232

第5章 偏微分方程式の境界値問題

October 5, 2018 1 / 113 4 ( ) 2 / 113 Poisson 5.1 Poisson ( A.7.1) Poisson Poisson 1 (A.6 ) Γ p p N u D Γ D b 5.1.1: = Γ D Γ N 3 / 113 Poisson 5.1.1 d {2, 3} Lipschitz (A.5 ) Γ D Γ N = \ Γ D Γ p Γ N Γ

税制改正にともなう家計の所得弾性値 : 高齢者パネルデータによる実証分析

Kwansei Gakuin University Rep Title Author(s) 税制改正にともなう家計の所得弾性値 : 高齢者パネルデータによる実証分析 Uemura, Toshiyuki, 上村, 敏之 ; Kitamura Takayuki, 金田, 陸幸 Citation 経済学論究, 69(4): 1-16 Issue Date 2016-3-20 URL http://hdl.handle.net/10236/14671

ii 3.,. 4. F. ( ), ,,. 8.,. 1. (75% ) (25% ) =7 24, =7 25, =7 26 (. ). 1.,, ( ). 3.,...,.,.,.,.,. ( ) (1 2 )., ( ), 0., 1., 0,.

(1 C205) 4 10 (2 C206) 4 11 (2 B202) 4 12 25(2013) http://www.math.is.tohoku.ac.jp/~obata,.,,,..,,. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 1., 2007 ( ).,. 2. P. G., 1995. 3. J. C., 1988. 1... 2.,,. ii 3.,. 4. F. ( ),..

untitled

Barro Regression Does social capital improve regional economic growth? - Investigation using prefectural cross-sectional data in Japan - Abstract The purpose of this research is to empirically examine

2 G(k) e ikx = (ik) n x n n! n=0 (k ) ( ) X n = ( i) n n k n G(k) k=0 F (k) ln G(k) = ln e ikx n κ n F (k) = F (k) (ik) n n= n! κ n κ n = ( i) n n k n

. X {x, x 2, x 3,... x n } X X {, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6} X x i P i. 0 P i 2. n P i = 3. P (i ω) = i ω P i P 3 {x, x 2, x 3,... x n } ω P i = 6 X f(x) f(x) X n n f(x i )P i n x n i P i X n 2 G(k) e ikx = (ik) n

1990年代以降の日本の経済変動

1990 * kenichi.sakura@boj.or.jp ** hitoshi.sasaki@boj.or.jp *** masahiro.higo@boj.or.jp No.05-J-10 2005 12 103-8660 30 * ** *** 1990 2005 12 1990 1990 1990 2005 11 2425 BIS E-mail: kenichi.sakura@boj.or.jp

A

A04-164 2008 2 13 1 4 1.1.......................................... 4 1.2..................................... 4 1.3..................................... 4 1.4..................................... 5 2

shuron.dvi

01M3065 1 4 1.1........................... 4 1.2........................ 5 1.3........................ 6 2 8 2.1.......................... 8 2.2....................... 9 3 13 3.1.............................

: : : : ) ) 1. d ij f i e i x i v j m a ij m f ij n x i =

1 1980 1) 1 2 3 19721960 1965 2) 1999 1 69 1980 1972: 55 1999: 179 2041999: 210 211 1999: 211 3 2003 1987 92 97 3) 1960 1965 1970 1985 1990 1995 4) 1. d ij f i e i x i v j m a ij m f ij n x i = n d ij

KATO, Hironori ONODA, Keiichi KIMATA, Masaki Becker DeSerpa 7 8 value of saving time Value of Travel Time Saving VTTS 002 Vol.

KATO, Hironori ONODA, Keiichi KIMATA, Masaki 1 2 3 4 5 6 2 2.1 Becker 1 26 DeSerpa 78 value of saving time Value of Travel Time Saving VTTS 2 Vol.9 No.2 26 Summer 2.2 9111 X T xt Pt i i c i i I T ˆt i

BIS CDO CDO CDO CDO Cifuentes and O Connor[1] Finger[6] Li[8] Duffie and Garleânu[4] CDO Merton[9] CDO 1 CDO CDO CDS CDO three jump model Longstaff an

CDO 2010 5 18 CDO(Collateralized Debt Obligation) Duffie and Garleânu[4] CDO CDS(Credit Default Swap) Duffie and Garleânu[4] 4 CDO CDS CDO CDS CDO 2007 CDO CDO CDS 1 1.1 2007 2008 9 15 ( ) CDO CDO 80 E-mail:taiji.ohka@gmail.com

Public Pension and Immigration The Effects of Immigration on Welfare Inequality The immigration of unskilled workers has been analyzed by a considerab

Public Pension and Immigration The Effects of Immigration on Welfare Inequality The immigration of unskilled workers has been analyzed by a considerable amount of research, which has noted an ability distribution.

さくらの個別指導 ( さくら教育研究所 ) 1 φ = φ 1 : φ [ ] a [ ] 1 a : b a b b(a + b) b a 2 a 2 = b(a + b). b 2 ( a b ) 2 = a b a/b X 2 X 1 = 0 a/b > 0 2 a

φ + 5 2 φ : φ [ ] a [ ] a : b a b b(a + b) b a 2 a 2 b(a + b). b 2 ( a b ) 2 a b + a/b X 2 X 0 a/b > 0 2 a b + 5 2 φ φ : 2 5 5 [ ] [ ] x x x : x : x x : x x : x x 2 x 2 x 0 x ± 5 2 x x φ : φ 2 : φ ( )

y i OLS [0, 1] OLS x i = (1, x 1,i,, x k,i ) β = (β 0, β 1,, β k ) G ( x i β) 1 G i 1 π i π i P {y i = 1 x i } = G (

7 2 2008 7 10 1 2 2 1.1 2............................................. 2 1.2 2.......................................... 2 1.3 2........................................ 3 1.4................................................

Optical Flow t t + δt 1 Motion Field 3 3 1) 2) 3) Lucas-Kanade 4) 1 t (x, y) I(x, y, t)

http://wwwieice-hbkborg/ 2 2 4 2 -- 2 4 2010 9 3 3 4-1 Lucas-Kanade 4-2 Mean Shift 3 4-3 2 c 2013 1/(18) http://wwwieice-hbkborg/ 2 2 4 2 -- 2 -- 4 4--1 2010 9 4--1--1 Optical Flow t t + δt 1 Motion Field

note1.dvi

(1) 1996 11 7 1 (1) 1. 1 dx dy d x τ xx x x, stress x + dx x τ xx x+dx dyd x x τ xx x dyd y τ xx x τ xx x+dx d dx y x dy 1. dx dy d x τ xy x τ x ρdxdyd x dx dy d ρdxdyd u x t = τ xx x+dx dyd τ xx x dyd

waseda2010a-jukaiki1-main.dvi

November, 2 Contents 6 2 8 3 3 3 32 32 33 5 34 34 6 35 35 7 4 R 2 7 4 4 9 42 42 2 43 44 2 5 : 2 5 5 23 52 52 23 53 53 23 54 24 6 24 6 6 26 62 62 26 63 t 27 7 27 7 7 28 72 72 28 73 36) 29 8 29 8 29 82 3

untitled

Horioka Nakagawa and Oshima u ( c ) t+ 1 E β (1 + r ) 1 = t i+ 1 u ( c ) t 0 β c t y t uc ( t ) E () t r t c E β t ct γ ( + r ) 1 0 t+ 1 1 = t+ 1 ξ ct + β ct γ c t + 1 1+ r ) E β t + 1 t ct (1

カルマンフィルターによるベータ推定（ ）

β TOPIX 1 22 β β smoothness priors (the Capital Asset Pricing Model, CAPM) CAPM 1 β β β β smoothness priors :,,. E-mail: koiti@ism.ac.jp., 104 1 TOPIX β Z i = β i Z m + α i (1) Z i Z m α i α i β i (the

A = A x x + A y y + A, B = B x x + B y y + B, C = C x x + C y y + C..6 x y A B C = A x x + A y y + A B x B y B C x C y C { B = A x x + A y y + A y B B

9 7 A = A x x + A y y + A, B = B x x + B y y + B, C = C x x + C y y + C..6 x y A B C = A x x + A y y + A B x B y B C x C y C { B = A x x + A y y + A y B B x x B } B C y C y + x B y C x C C x C y B = A

I = [a, b] R γ : I C γ(a) = γ(b) z C \ γ(i) 1(4) γ z winding number index Ind γ (z) = φ(b, z) φ(a, z) φ 1(1) (i)(ii) 1 1 c C \ {0} B(c; c ) L c z B(c;

21 1 http://www.ozawa.phys.waseda.ac.jp/index2.html ( ) 1. I = [a, b] R γ : I C γ γ(i) z 0 C \ γ(i) (1) ε > 0 φ : I B(z 0 ; ε) C (i) B(z 0 ; ε) γ(i) = (ii) (t, z) I B(z 0 ; ε) exp(φ(t, z)) = γ(t) z (2)

(Compton Scattering) Beaming 1 exp [i (k x ωt)] k λ k = 2π/λ ω = 2πν k = ω/c k x ωt ( ω ) k α c, k k x ωt η αβ k α x β diag( + ++) x β = (ct, x) O O x

Compton Scattering Beaming exp [i k x ωt] k λ k π/λ ω πν k ω/c k x ωt ω k α c, k k x ωt η αβ k α x β diag + ++ x β ct, x O O x O O v k α k α β, γ k γ k βk, k γ k + βk k γ k k, k γ k + βk 3 k k 4 k 3 k

Ł\”ƒ-2005

日本の教育経済学：実証分析の展望と課題.pdf

ESRI Discussion Paper Series No69 by October 2003 Economic and Social Research Institute Cabinet Office Tokyo, Japan 2 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 6 4 1 2 3 4 * 2003 8 7 B603 4 1 Schultz 1963 Becker 1964 human capital

第90回日本感染症学会学術講演会抄録（I）

ax 2 + bx + c = n 8 (n ) a n x n + a n 1 x n a 1 x + a 0 = 0 ( a n, a n 1,, a 1, a 0 a n 0) n n ( ) ( ) ax 3 + bx 2 + cx + d = 0 4

20 20.0 ( ) 8 y = ax 2 + bx + c 443 ax 2 + bx + c = 0 20.1 20.1.1 n 8 (n ) a n x n + a n 1 x n 1 + + a 1 x + a 0 = 0 ( a n, a n 1,, a 1, a 0 a n 0) n n ( ) ( ) ax 3 + bx 2 + cx + d = 0 444 ( a, b, c, d

2 3 4 II. 8 10 12 14 20 8 6,000 3,695 61.6 10 6,000 3754 62.6 12 5,010 3,111 62.1 149,000558362.0 62% 4 2059 ++5 4 78.3 (2%) 2002 3 8 10,12 14 8

453200810 I. Dicks-Mireaux and King (1983)Hubbard (1985) Dicks-Mireaux and King (1983)Hubbard (1985)(1990)(2000) Attanasio and Brugiavini(2003), Attanasio and Rohwedder(2003) (unobservable) heterogeneity

20/September/ (2007) (2007) Berger- ( 2000) Cinii 8 Sociological Abstracts relative deprivation ) *1 (2007) *2 2 4 δ Boudon-Kosaka

20/September/2009 1 (2007) (2007) Berger- ( 2000) Cinii 8 Sociological Abstracts relative deprivation 98 2009 9 11 ) *1 (2007) *2 2 4 δ Boudon-Kosaka (Kosaka 1986) Boudon-Kosaka- ) 1 1 3 Boudon-Kosaka

SO(3) 7 = = 1 ( r ) + 1 r r r r ( l ) (5.17) l = 1 ( sin θ ) + sin θ θ θ ϕ (5.18) χ(r)ψ(θ, ϕ) l ψ = αψ (5.19) l 1 = i(sin ϕ θ l = i( cos ϕ θ l 3 = i ϕ

SO(3) 71 5.7 5.7.1 1 ħ L k l k l k = iϵ kij x i j (5.117) l k SO(3) l z l ± = l 1 ± il = i(y z z y ) ± (z x x z ) = ( x iy) z ± z( x ± i y ) = X ± z ± z (5.118) l z = i(x y y x ) = 1 [(x + iy)( x i y )

1 Nelson-Siegel Nelson and Siegel(1987) 3 Nelson-Siegel 3 Nelson-Siegel 2 3 Nelson-Siegel 2 Nelson-Siegel Litterman and Scheinkman(199

Nelson-Siegel Nelson-Siegel 1992 2007 15 1 Nelson and Siegel(1987) 2 FF VAR 1996 FF B) 1 Nelson-Siegel 15 90 1 Nelson and Siegel(1987) 3 Nelson-Siegel 3 Nelson-Siegel 2 3 Nelson-Siegel 2 Nelson-Siegel

On the Limited Sample Effect of the Optimum Classifier by Bayesian Approach he Case of Independent Sample Size for Each Class Xuexian HA, etsushi WAKA

Journal Article / 学術雑誌論文 ベイズアプローチによる最適識別系の有限 標本効果に関する考察 : 学習標本の大きさ がクラス間で異なる場合 (< 論文小特集 > パ ターン認識のための学習 : 基礎と応用 On the limited sample effect of bayesian approach : the case of each class 韓, 雪仙 ; 若林, 哲史

1 n 1 1 2 2 3 3 3.1............................ 3 3.2............................. 6 3.2.1.............. 6 3.2.2................. 7 3.2.3........................... 10 4 11 4.1..........................

ohpmain.dvi

fujisawa@ism.ac.jp 1 Contents 1. 2. 3. 4. γ- 2 1. 3 10 5.6, 5.7, 5.4, 5.5, 5.8, 5.5, 5.3, 5.6, 5.4, 5.2. 5.5 5.6 +5.7 +5.4 +5.5 +5.8 +5.5 +5.3 +5.6 +5.4 +5.2 =5.5. 10 outlier 5 5.6, 5.7, 5.4, 5.5, 5.8,

Real AdaBoost HOG 2009 3 A Graduation Thesis of College of Engineering, Chubu University Efficient Reducing Method of HOG Features for Human Detection based on Real AdaBoost Chika Matsushima ITS Graphics

直交座標系の回転

b T.Koama x l x, Lx i ij j j xi i i i, x L T L L, L ± x L T xax axx, ( a a ) i, j ij i j ij ji λ λ + λ + + λ i i i x L T T T x ( L) L T xax T ( T L T ) A( L) T ( LAL T ) T ( L AL) λ ii L AL Λ λi i axx

all.dvi

72 9 Hooke,,,. Hooke. 9.1 Hooke 1 Hooke. 1, 1 Hooke. σ, ε, Young. σ ε (9.1), Young. τ γ G τ Gγ (9.2) X 1, X 2. Poisson, Poisson ν. ν ε 22 (9.) ε 11 F F X 2 X 1 9.1: Poisson 9.1. Hooke 7 Young Poisson G

βdxβ r a, < E e uγ r ha d E e r dx e r γd e r βdx 3.2 a = {a} γ = {γ} max E e r dx e r γd e r βdx, 2 s.. dx = qand + σndz, 1 E e r uγ ha d, 3 a arg maxã E e r uγ hã d. 4 3.3 γ = {γ : γ, γ} a = {a : a,

guideline_1_0.dvi

Version 1.0 ( 22 5 ) cflkanta Matsuura Laboratory 2010, all rights reserved. I 3 1 3 2 3 3 4 II 8 4 8 5 9 5.1......................... 9 5.2......................... 10 5.3......................... 10

財政赤字の経済分析：中長期的視点からの考察

000 364 645 (ax smoohing (Barro(979 Barro(979 (consumpion smoohing Hall(978 Campbell(987 Barro(979 Hall(978 Campbell(987 Campbell(987 B ( r B G T ( ( r E B G T Y T/Y r ( No Ponzi Game ( [ Ω ] Y ( lim (

財政赤字の経済分析：中長期的視点からの考察

1998 1999 1998 1999 10 10 1999 30 (1982, 1996) (1997) (1977) (1990) (1996) (1997) (1996) Ihori, Doi, and Kondo (1999) (1982) (1984) (1987) (1993) (1997) (1998) CAPM 1980 (time inconsistency) Persson, Persson

2016 (8) Variety Expansion Effects by Feenstra (1994) 1 Variety Effects Dixit and Stiglitz (1977) CES n n? n t U t = ( nt i=1 σ > 1, a it > 0,

2016 8 29 1 4 Variety Expansion Effects by Feenstra 1994 1 Variety Effects Dix and Stiglz 1977 CES n n? n t U t σ > 1, a > 0, σ a q σ n a 1 σ a p q U t P t E U t, p t U t P t U t V p, I I t a σ p 1 σ a

CVaR

CVaR 20 4 24 3 24 1 31 ,.,.,. Markowitz,., (Value-at-Risk, VaR) (Conditional Value-at-Risk, CVaR). VaR, CVaR VaR. CVaR, CVaR. CVaR,,.,.,,,.,,. 1 5 2 VaR CVaR 6 2.1................................................

all.dvi

38 5 Cauchy.,,,,., σ.,, 3,,. 5.1 Cauchy (a) (b) (a) (b) 5.1: 5.1. Cauchy 39 F Q Newton F F F Q F Q 5.2: n n ds df n ( 5.1). df n n df(n) df n, t n. t n = df n (5.1) ds 40 5 Cauchy t l n mds df n 5.3: t

448 Vol. 44 No 図

Spring 09 447 概要 2004 1 2 I はじめに 19 2007 1. 34 2006 1. 32 90 1 90 Galor and Weil 1996 1996 1999 90 Sleebos 2003 Apps and Rees 2004 Martínez and Iza 2004 448 Vol. 44 No. 4 2. 20 2. 00 1. 80 1. 60 1. 40

村本　孜５１‐８５／５１‐８５

One for all, all for one. One for all, all for one. ( One for all, all for one. ) One for all, all for one. ( One for all, all for one. ) One for all, all for one. Manes, A. (1877~1963) [2006] p. 37 Raiffisen

物価変動の決定要因について　― 需給ギャップと物価変動の関係の国際比較を中心に―

NAIRU NAIRU NAIRU GDPGDP NAIRUNon- Accelerating Inflation Rate of Unemployment GDP GDP NAIRU Lown and RichFisher, Mahadeva and Whitley raw materials G NAIRUTurnerFai WatanabeNAIRU Watanabe nested NAIRU

k2 ( :35 ) ( k2) (GLM) web web 1 :

2012 11 01 k2 (2012-10-26 16:35 ) 1 6 2 (2012 11 01 k2) (GLM) kubo@ees.hokudai.ac.jp web http://goo.gl/wijx2 web http://goo.gl/ufq2 1 : 2 2 4 3 7 4 9 5 : 11 5.1................... 13 6 14 6.1......................

1 911 9001030 9:00 A B C D E F G H I J K L M 1A0900 1B0900 1C0900 1D0900 1E0900 1F0900 1G0900 1H0900 1I0900 1J0900 1K0900 1L0900 1M0900 9:15 1A0915 1B0915 1C0915 1D0915 1E0915 1F0915 1G0915 1H0915 1I0915

renshumondai-kaito.dvi

3 1 13 14 1.1 1 44.5 39.5 49.5 2 0.10 2 0.10 54.5 49.5 59.5 5 0.25 7 0.35 64.5 59.5 69.5 8 0.40 15 0.75 74.5 69.5 79.5 3 0.15 18 0.90 84.5 79.5 89.5 2 0.10 20 1.00 20 1.00 2 1.2 1 16.5 20.5 12.5 2 0.10

遺産相続、学歴及び退職金の決定要因に関する実証分析　『家族関係、就労、退職金及び教育・資産の世代間移転に関する世帯アンケート調査』

2-1. (2-1 ) (2-2 ) (2-3 ) (Hayashi [1986]Dekle [1989]Barthold and Ito [1992] [1996]Campbell [1997] [1998]Shimono and Ishikawa [2002]Shimono and Otsuki [2006] [2008]Horioka [2009]) 1 2-1-1 2-1-1-1 8 (1.

12/1 ( ) GLM, R MCMC, WinBUGS 12/2 ( ) WinBUGS WinBUGS 12/2 ( ) : 12/3 ( ) :? ( :51 ) 2/ 71

2010-12-02 (2010 12 02 10 :51 ) 1/ 71 GCOE 2010-12-02 WinBUGS kubo@ees.hokudai.ac.jp http://goo.gl/bukrb 12/1 ( ) GLM, R MCMC, WinBUGS 12/2 ( ) WinBUGS WinBUGS 12/2 ( ) : 12/3 ( ) :? 2010-12-02 (2010 12

プリント

untitled

2 book conference 1990 2003 14 Repeated Cross-Section Data 1 M1,M2 M1 Sekine(1998) Repeated Cross-Section Data 1 1. (1989), Yoshida and Rasche(1990), Rasche(1990), 19921997, Fujiki and Mulligan(1996),

02.„o“φiflì„㙃fic†j

X-12-ARIMA Band-PassDECOMP HP X-12-ARIMADECOMP HPBeveridge and Nelson DECOMP X-12-ARIMA Band-PassHodrick and PrescottHP DECOMPBeveridge and Nelson M CD X ARIMA DECOMP HP Band-PassDECOMP Kiyotaki and Moore

untitled

17 5 13 1 2 1.1... 2 1.2... 2 1.3... 3 2 3 2.1... 3 2.2... 5 3 6 3.1... 6 3.2... 7 3.3 t... 7 3.4 BC a... 9 3.5... 10 4 11 1 1 θ n ˆθ. ˆθ, ˆθ, ˆθ.,, ˆθ.,.,,,. 1.1 ˆθ σ 2 = E(ˆθ E ˆθ) 2 b = E(ˆθ θ). Y 1,,Y

LCC LCC INOUE, Gaku TANSEI, Kiyoteru KIDO, Motohiro IMAMURA, Takahiro LCC 7 LCC Ryanair 1 Ryanair Number of Passengers 2,000,000 1,800,000 1,

LCC LCC INOUE, Gaku TANSEI, Kiyoteru KIDO, Motohiro IMAMURA, Takahiro 1 23 LCC 7 LCC Ryanair 1 Ryanair Number of Passengers 2,, 1,8, 1,6, 1,4, 1,2, 1,, 8, 6, 4, 2, 1985 1987 199 1993 1996 1998 Barrett

Visit Japan Campaign OD OD 18 UNWTO 19 OD JNTO ODUNWTO 1 1

UNWTO OD 2 FURUYA, Hideki 1 LCC 1 2 OD 1 2 OD 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 /1 GDP M. H. Mohd Hanafiah and M. F. Mohd Harun 12 GDP 1 13 Vol.15 No.4 2013 Winter 041 3 3.1 6222011 Visit Japan Campaign2003521 10119

(1) (2) 27 7 15 (1) (2), E-mail: bessho@econ.keio.ac.jp 1 2 1.1......................................... 2 1.2............................... 2 1.3............................... 3 1.4............................