グローバル・バリュー・チェーンの長さ指標:製造業とサービス業
|
|
- たかとし はらしない
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 upstreamness Heiwai Tang kenji.suganuma@boj.or.jp / /
2 1. Timmer et al. [2014] Global Value Chain: GVC GVC FTA EU ASEAN IT Krugman [1980] Melitz [2003] iphone GVC upstreamness Antràs and Chor [2013] 2 /2016.7
3 GVC GVC GVC GVC
4 Antràs and Chor [2013] 2011 Fally [2012] 2 Antràs et al. [2012] Antràs et al. [2012] i (1) (3) 2 Antràs et al. [2012] (1) nj=1 U i =1 Fi d ij F nj=1 nk=1 j d ik d kj F j (Antràs and Chor [2013]) (1) Y i Y i Y i U i = 1 + n j=1 d ij Y j Y i U j (Fally [2012]) (2) U i = 1 Y i n j=1 Y i d jj (Antràs et al. [2012]) (3) Antràs et al. [2012] OECD-STAN EU GDP... 1 output upstreamness /2016.7
5 GDP Fally [2012] Antràs et al. [2012] GVC Fally and Hillberry [2015] IDE-JETRO Value-added content of export ratio: VAX GVC Ito and Veniza [2015] Fally and Hillberry [2015] IDE-JETRO i ii iii Miller and Temurshoev [2015] World Input Output Database WIOD Johnson [2014] 1 5
6 5 WIOD World Input Output Table National Input Output Table IDE-JETRO Asian International Input Output Table OECD (Inter-Country Input Output Tables) 61 OECD Johnson and Noguera [2012] IDE-JETRO OECD Johnson [2014] WIOD Antràs and Yeaple [2014] Timmer et al. [2014] Los, Timmer,... 5WIOD , , EU EU EU KLEMS WIOD rest of the world 7WIOD Dietzenbacher et al. [2013] Timmer et al. [2015] 8 9 OECD Trade in Value Added: TiVA /2016.7
7 and de Vries [2015] WIOD GVC WIOD WIOD WIOD
8 IDE-JETRO WIOD WIOD Y i i F i i Z i a ij j /2016.7
9 1 WIOD 2 i A Y F Y (4) I n n a 11 a 1n A:=....., a n1 a nn F 1 F :=. F n, Y 1 Y :=. Y n, Y:= diag( Y ) = Y (4) 0 Y n 9
10 d ij j 1 i a ij /Y j D = (d ij ) (5) AY 1 a 11 a 1n d 11 d 1n Y 1 Y n D:=..... = AY 1 =..... d n1 d nn a n1 Y 1 a nn Y n. (5) (1) Antràs and Chor [2013] i (Y i ) i (F i ) j (Z i ) 2 Z i (6) n n Y i = F i + Z i = F i + a ij = F i + d ij Y j j=1 j=1 n n n n n n = F i + d ij F j + d ik d kj F j + d il d lk d kj F j +. (6) j=1 j=1 k=1 j=1 k=1 l=1 (6) 2 1 i i 2 i j 3 i k j (6) 1 i 2 i j 3 i k j (6) i Y i (7) 1 = F nj=1 i d ij F nj=1 nk=1 j d ik d kj F nj=1 nk=1 nl=1 j d il d lk d kj F j (7) Y i Y i Y i Y i i (U i ) (7) (8) 10 /2016.7
11 nj=1 U i = 1 Fi d ij F nj=1 nk=1 j d ik d kj F j Y i Y i Y i nj=1 nk=1 nl=1 d il d lk d kj F j (8) Y i U = (U 1,...,U n ) (4) (5) (9) U = Y 1 [I + 2D + 3D 2 + ] F. (9) (9) [I D] Y (10) U (11) [I D] Y U = [I + D + D 2 + ] F = [I D] 1 F, (10) U = Y 1 [I D] 2 F. (11) (11) Antràs et al. [2012] (6) Y (12) Y = [I + D + D 2 + ] F = [I D] 1 F. (12) (12) [I D] 1 (12) (11) (5) (13) U = Y 1 [I D] 1 Y = [Y DY] 1 Y 1 = [I Y 1 A] 1 1, (13) 1 1 n B (14) (15) a 11 a 1n Y 1 Y 1 B:= Y 1 A =....., a n1 a nn Y n Y n (14) U = [I B] 1 1. (15) 11
12 (15) Ito and Vezina [2015] (15) [I B] 1 (Miller and Temurshoev [2015]) 1 1 (6) Z i = 0 Y i = F i (8) WIOD (15) (16) U = [I + B + B 2 + ] 1. (16) (16) (16) (16) B = (b ij ) i 1 i j i 2011 Z F 12 /2016.7
13 ( ) Y ( ) Z (1) (0.66) 34 i ( ) F (1) 2 39 ( ) Z (2) 2 (0.39) 11 [I + B + B 2 + ] (16) j i U ci c i c U c (Y ci /Y c ) (17) U c = n i=1 ( ) U ci Yci. (17) Y c
14 ΔU c ΔU ci Δ (Y ci /Y c ) 2 within effect between effect (18) ΔU c = n i=1 [ ΔU ci ( Yci Y c )] + n i=1 [ U ci Δ ( Yci Y c )]. (18) (18) 1 2 (U) (ΔU) (Y c /Y) (19) (20) U = m c=1 ( ) U c Yc, (19) Y ΔU = m c=1 [ ΔU c ( )] Yc + Y m c=1 [ U c Δ ( Yc Y )]. (20) i U i (21) (Y ci /Y i ) ΔU i (22) (21) i U i (Y i /Y) (23) ΔU (24) (19) (23) (20) (24) U i = m c=1 ( ) U ci Yci, (21) Y i ΔU i = m c=1 [ ΔU ci ( Yci Y i )] + m c=1 [ U ci Δ ( Yci Y i )], (22) 14 /2016.7
15 U = n i=1 ( ) U i Yi, (23) Y ΔU = n i=1 [ ΔU i ( )] Yi + Y n i=1 [ U i Δ ( Yi Y )]. (24) (24) (18) 1 n i=1 U i Δ(Y i /Y) n i=1 U ci Δ(Y ci /Y) WIOD 15
16 WIOD (22) (a), (b) (22) ΔU ci (Y ci /Y i ) i 3(a) /2016.7
17 WIOD (b)
18 (18) (18) (16) (a) (b) Fally [2012] /2016.7
19 WIOD (b) GVC 19
20 WIOD 6(c) /2016.7
21 6 (b) WIOD 21
22 3 7 (22) (22) WIOD /2016.7
23 8 WIOD 3 WIOD EU WIOD WIOD EU NACE WIOD WIOD 23
24 9 2 (16) 1 9(a) Research and Development: R&D 9(b) (c) i j i j k k j k (8) 2 i j 2 3 i j 24 /2016.7
25 R&D 2 10(a) 10(b) k 25
26 Wi-Fi GVC R&D 26 /2016.7
27 value-added ratio 22 Ito and Vezina [2015] Baldwin, Ito, and Sato [2014] U 3 Miller and Temurshoev [2015] 23 GVC 4 2 GVC input downstreamness 27
28 11 WIOD 28 /2016.7
29 Antràs, Pol, Davin Chor, Thibault Fally, and Russell Hillberry, Measuring the Upstreamness of Production and Trade Flows, American Economic Review, 102(3), 2012, pp ,and, Organizing the Global Value Chain, Econometrica, 81(6), 2013, pp , and Stephen R. Yeaple, Multinational Firms and the Structure of International Trade, Handbook of International Economics, 4, 2014, pp Baldwin, Richard, Tadashi Ito, and Hitoshi Sato, Portrait of Factory Asia: Production Network in Asia and Its Implication for Growth The Smile Curve, Joint Research Program Series, IDE-JETRO, 159, Bernard, Andrew B., J. Bradford Jensen, Stephen J. Redding, and Peter K. Schott, Firms in International Trade, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(3),2007,pp Dietzenbacher, Erik, Bart Los, Robert Stehrer, Marcel P. Timmer, and Gaaitzen J. de Vries, The Construction of World Input Output Tables in the WIOD Project, Economic Systems Research, 25, 2013, pp Fally, Thibault, Production Staging: Measurement and Facts, Working paper, 2012 (available at and Russell Hillberry, A Coasian Model of International Production Chain, NBER Working Paper, No , Helpman, Elhanan, Marc J. Melitz, and Yona Rubinstein, Estimating Trade Flows: Trading Partners and Trading Volumes, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123(2), 2008, pp Ito, Tadashi, and Pierre-Louis Vezina, Production Fragmentation, Upstreamness, and Value-Added: Evidence from Factory Asia , IDE Discussion Paper, 535, Krugman, Paul R., Scale Economies, Product Differentiation, and the Pattern of Trade, American Economic Review, 70, 1980, pp Johnson, Robert C., Five Facts about Value-Added Exports and Implications for Macroeconomics and Trade Research, Journal of Economics Perspectives, 28(2), 2014, pp , and Guillermo Noguera, Fragmentation and Trade in Value Added Over Four Decades, NBER Working Paper, No , Los, Bart, Marcel P. Timmer, and Gaaitzen J. de Vries, How Global are Global Value Chains? A New Approach to Measure International Fragmentation, Journal of Regional Science, 55(1), 2015, pp
30 Markusen, James R., Expansion of Trade at the Extensive Margin: A General Gains-from- Trade Result and Illustrative Examples, Journal of International Economics, 89(1), 2013, pp Melitz, Marc J., The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity, Econometrica, 71(6), 2003, pp Miller, Ronald E., and Umed Temurshoev, Output Upstreamness and Input Downstreamness of Industries/Countries in World Production, International Regional Science Review, 2015, published online before print. Timmer, Marcel P., Abdul Azeez Erumban, Bart Los, Robert Stehrer, and Gaaitzen J. de Vries, Slicing up Global Value Chains, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28(2),2014, pp , Erik Dietzenbacher, Bart Los, Robert Stehrer, and Gaaitzen J. de Vries, An Illustrated User Guide to the World Input Output Database: The Case of Global Automotive Production, Review of International Economics, 23, 2015, pp /2016.7
31 A-1(a) A-1(b) 31
32 A-1 WIOD 32 /2016.7
33 extensive margin intensive margin Helpman, Melitz, and Rubinstein [2008] Markusen [2013] 25 R&D servicification Bernard et al. [2007]
34 A-2 WIOD 27 A WIOD previous year s price: PYP PYP 1998 PYP PYP 1996 PYP /2016.7
商学 63‐3☆/6.山本
193 W. A. 1 2 3 1 2 WTO FTA TPP D. P. P. W. A. 194 2 3 Lewis 1954 1982, 1987 1999 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 A B 1987 119 1985 Krugman and Obstfeld 2009 19742006 3 W. A. 195 2 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 A a1 a2 * * i ai i 1, 2
More information産業・企業レベルデータで見た日本の経済成長.pdf
2003 11 10 IT IT JIP JCER ) 2003 CD-ROM http://www.esri.go.jp/jp/archive/bun/bun170/170index. html 1 JIP Jorgenson, Mun, andstiroh (2002) GDP 2 3 1951 1954 1957 1960 1963 1966 1969 1972 1975 1978 1981
More information2016 (8) Variety Expansion Effects by Feenstra (1994) 1 Variety Effects Dixit and Stiglitz (1977) CES n n? n t U t = ( nt i=1 σ > 1, a it > 0,
2016 8 29 1 4 Variety Expansion Effects by Feenstra 1994 1 Variety Effects Dix and Stiglz 1977 CES n n? n t U t σ > 1, a > 0, σ a q σ n a 1 σ a p q U t P t E U t, p t U t P t U t V p, I I t a σ p 1 σ a
More information国際学研究 2‐1☆/目次(2‐1)
Economic Development and Structural Changes : A Look through Productivity and Wages Akira Kohsaka Abstract : This paper examines the dynamisms of structural changes in the process of economic development
More informationGDPギャップと潜在成長率
2003 output gap 80 1 20 90 20 70 2 1 2 output gap potential output 1 2 (2001) 3 potential rate of growth 2000 Meyer (2000) European Central Bank: (1999b) 2002 10 4 3 (2000) 4 4 () 5 5 5 6 () () 7 Total
More information日本は今なお熟練労働集約的な財を純輸出しているか?
日 本 銀 行 ワーキングペーパーシリーズ 日 本 は 今 なお 熟 練 労 働 集 約 的 な 財 を 純 輸 出 しているか? 清 田 耕 造 * kiyota@sanken.keio.ac.jp No.14-J-1 2014 年 1 月 日 本 銀 行 103-8660 日 本 郵 便 ( 株 ) 日 本 橋 郵 便 局 私 書 箱 30 号 * 慶 應 義 塾 大 学 産 業 研 究 所 日
More information表紙_目次.PDF
JIL 2 1980 vol.3 15 3 1 3 15 18 IT 26 28 33 20 OECD 80 90 (1998) (2000) 2 Aghion et al. (1999) OECD 1970 1 2 70 1980 90 1.1 Kuznets U inverted U-shaped hypothesis GNP U 1 18901940 6 3 Kuznets(1955) (1963)
More information高齢化とマクロ投資比率―国際パネルデータを用いた分析―
196 2017 * ** ** ** ** 160 2 2 JEL Classification Codes E21, E22, J11 Keywords * ESRI 28 ESRI 29 3 17 ESRI ** 115 196 Population Aging and Domestic Investment An Analysis Using International Panel Data
More informationRIETI Highlight VOL.25
RIETI Highlight 2009 SUMMER 25 VOL. Research Digest RIETI 2009 SUMMER VOL. 25 Highlight 1 2 3 5 8 10 12 13 14 19 ResearchDigest 20 24 28 32 36 38 40 41 42 44 45 RIETI Topics 01 CONTENTS 02 RIETI Highlight
More informationuntitled
Trade and Trade Finance in the 200809 Financial Crisis, IMF Working Paper WP/11/16., Understanding the Great Trade Collapse of 200809 and the Subsequent Trade Recovery, Economic Perspectives, 2Q/2011.
More information東アジアにおける貿易パターンと直接投資:日本製造業への影響
Working Paper Series Vol. 2003-03 2003 5 Working Paper 1 1980 1980 EU 1985 90 1 2 3 4 [1998] p.76 4 90 2002 200 11 4,160 18,800 348 276 72 90 ASEAN [2001] Kimura and Fukasaku [2002] 1 1 2 3 20 3 4 5 HS9
More information2 / 24
2017 11 9 1 / 24 2 / 24 Solow, 1957 total factor productivity; TFP 5% 経済成長率の要因分解 4% 3% 2.68% 2.51% 2% 1% 0% 1.63% 1.50% 0.34% 0.42% 0.55% 0.97% 1.14% 0.86% 0.13% -0.59% -0.59% -0.09% 0.01% -1% 1970-80
More informationOECD INVEST JAPAN jp/ij/index.htm
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org) Title OECD 諸国における経営資源の収益率の推計 Sub Title Rates of return on managerial resources : the case of OECD countries Author 遠藤, 正寛 (Endoh, Masahiro) Publisher 慶應義塾大学出版会 Publication
More information........,.,.,..,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,., International Capital Market Litan et al a b c d M&A a a b E- e- Litan et al. : Table Levine World Bank Levine Greenwald et al. B R F R r R R r B R r B R r B R R Stiglitz
More information- March IMF IMF IMF ITO The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade
M&A IMF IMF gold tranche - March IMF IMF IMF ITO The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade IMF IMF IMF GATT OECD OECD BITs. - March. U I = I (r m, i, Z * r m i Z * (= Z / Z) I / r m > I / i < I / Z *
More informationアロー『やってみて学習』から学習:経済成長にとっての教訓 Learning from `Learning by Doing': Lessons for Economic Growth
Learning from Learning by Doing : Lessons for Economic Growth M *1 * 2 1997 2004 10 1-2013 12 29 Version1.0 2014 3 2 *1 c 2010 MIT *2 c 2004-2013 i 1993 40 MIT 1991 ii R.M.S. * 1 *1 iii i 1 1 2 15 3 27
More informationp *2 DSGEDynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium New Keynesian *2 2
2013 1 nabe@ier.hit-u.ac.jp 2013 4 11 Jorgenson Tobin q : Hayashi s Theorem : Jordan : 1 investment 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 *1 *1 93SNA 1 p.180 1936 100 1970 *2 DSGEDynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium New Keynesian
More informationCoulibaly & Fontagné Finger & Kreinin 1979 Lee Coulibaly & Fontagné 2004 Coulibaly & Fontagné distance 4 i
1 2 3 Iwata, Kato, Shibasaki 2010 GDP Kurmanalieva 2008 Kurmanalieva 2008 169 41 2011 1980 1990 2 Coulibaly & Fontagné 2004 3 Finger & Kreinin 1979 Lee 1997 4 Coulibaly & Fontagné 2004 Coulibaly & Fontagné
More informationアジアの資本移動の変化に関するクラスター分析 アジア域内の証券投資活性化に向けて
* ** 199 1 1996-97 relation * ** Seoul conference China and Emerging Asia: Reorganizing the Global Economy? held by KIEP and Seoul National University 26 5 11-12 Hugh Patrick Yung-Chul Park 26 9 9-1 East
More informationわが国企業による資金調達方法の選択問題
* takeshi.shimatani@boj.or.jp ** kawai@ml.me.titech.ac.jp *** naohiko.baba@boj.or.jp No.05-J-3 2005 3 103-8660 30 No.05-J-3 2005 3 1990 * E-mailtakeshi.shimatani@boj.or.jp ** E-mailkawai@ml.me.titech.ac.jp
More informationデフレの定義(最新版).PDF
DP/01-1 Director General for Economic Assessment and Policy Analysis CABINET OFFICE E-mail : naoki.okamoto@mfs.cao.go.jp 1 2 3 i (ii) 4 5 Deflation defined as at least two consecutive years of price decreases.
More information1 1 1 [2000]
* 2000 7 26 1 1 1 [2000] 1 2 1 2 2 1 B to C 250000 億円 200000 日本米国 213,200 150000 100000 50000 0 153,600 106,900 71,100 66,620 42,700 43,860 22,500 26,940 15,340 645 3,360 7,730 1998 年 1999 年 2000 年 2001
More informationAssociation of South East Asian Nations: ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN
Association of South East Asian Nations: ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN Free Trade Agreement: FTA FTA ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN The European Union: EU
More information2
1 2 3 2003 3 2002 10 2000 4 1 (Y/L)/ (Y/L)= NonIT (K NonIT/L)/ (K NonIT/L)+ IT (K IT/L)/ (K IT/L) TFP/TFP Y:, L:, K NonIT: IT, K IT: IT NonIT, IT 2 TFP 5 6 i ii iii iv 1 2 3 2003 3 2002 10 2000 4 1 (Y/L)/
More information【表紙】経済学論叢_18号/表1・3・背
Blanchard Solow Solow Galor and Tsiddon ,, , ,, ,,,,,, a if b c if if CES CES,,,,,,. Bowles Ciccone and Peri, .,, Bowles Hamermesh Antras Ciccone and Peri CES CES Krusell et al. Duffy et al. Hornstein
More informationWinter 図 1 図 OECD OECD OECD OECD 2003
266 Vol. 44 No. 3 I 序論 Mirrlees 1971 Diamond 1998 Saez 2002 Kaplow 2008 1 700 900 1, 300 1, 700 II III IV V II わが国の再分配の状況と国際比較 OECD Forster and Mira d Ercole 2005 2006 2001 Winter 08 267 図 1 図 2 2000 2
More informationMicrosoft Word - Šv”|“Å‘I.DOC
90 ª ª * E-mailshinobu.nakagawa@boj.or.jp i ii iii iv SNA 1 70 80 2 80 90 80 80 90 1 80 90 98 6 1 1 SNA 2 1 SNA 80 1SNA 1 19931998 1 2-190 1,2 2 2-2 2-3,4 3 2-5 4 2030 2-3 3 2-15 97 20 90 2-15 9198 1.
More informationTitle ベンチャー企業の研究開発支出の決定要因 日本と台湾の事例を中心に Author(s) 蘇, 顯揚 Citation 經濟論叢 (1996), 158(1): Issue Date URL Right
Title ベンチャー企業の研究開発支出の決定要因 日本と台湾の事例を中心に Author(s) 蘇, 顯揚 Citation 經濟論叢 (1996), 158(1): 54-76 Issue Date 1996-07 URL https://doi.org/10.14989/45083 Right Type Departmental Bulletin Paper Textversion publisher
More informationPsacharopulos Psacharopulos and Patrinos (1) Byron and Takahashi McMahon and Boediono Duflo (2)
Psacharopulos Psacharopulos and Patrinos (1) Byron and Takahashi McMahon and Boediono Duflo (2) (3) Survei Sosial Economi NasionalNational Socio-economic Survey SUSENAS KorModul (4) SUSENAS (5) (6) t
More information_16_.indd
well-being well-being well-being Cantril Ladder well-being well-being Cantril Self-Anchoring Striving Scale Cantril Ladder Ladder Ladder awellbeing well-being well-being Gallup World Poll World Database
More information和RIM28_向山氏.indd
9ASEAN 23 2615.314.7EU 12.3 27.1 223 2638.1 M&A45.3 2.6 CIS97.5 2 ASEAN 26 RIM 28 Vol.8 No.28 13 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 8 9 14 RIM 28 Vol.8 No.28 ASEAN 2 28 GDP 15 2 199798 5 5 15 1997 98 99 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 World
More information60 Vol. 44 No. 1 2 準市場 化の制度的枠組み: 英国 教育改革法 1988 の例 Education Reform Act a School Performance Tables LEA 4 LEA LEA 3
Summer 08 59 I はじめに quasi market II III IV V 1 II 教育サービスにおける 準市場 1 教育サービスにおける 準市場 の意義 Education Reform Act 1988 1980 Local Education Authorities LEA Le Grand 1991 Glennerster 1991 3 1 2 3 2 60 Vol. 44
More informationSHIBATA, Tsubasa KOSAKA, Hiroyuki Vol.14 No Winter 013
9 5 1 89 3 SHIBATA, Tsubasa KOSAKA, Hiroyuki 1 9 3 9 9 2 3 4 5 6 7 2 1967 1 1973 2 1974 3 1997 4 Vol.14 No.4 2012 Winter 013 CGE 5 6 1996 7 6 CGE 9 5 1 835 9 35 3 3.1 9 9 4012 2 5 1 8 1 35 8 12 2 1. 2.
More information開発金融増刊号
4 6 Y = f (, E, Y E ( Y E = α ( E α we py α 0 β E ( ( E β ( E β 6 ( = ( α β ( E β 8 i Y i f i, E i, i 9 Y = α α ( α E α S E 0 ( β β E β E( β E β β6 ( we Y = = = α β E py E β ( β Y Y B Y A r / pr p Y
More information3 * *
3 * 199090 1999122000 18927.5 2000 *739 85291 5 1 E-mail: kinbara@hiroshima-u.ac.jp 4 19801990 1960 R. Vernon, 1971 1985 62 1985 5 1989 19851221986 22319873361988470 19896751990 360560 1992 1990 1990 198661
More information伝統的な経済学では、「消費は重要ではあるが、気にしなくてもよい」と考えられてきた
2005 1 2004 SARS 2003 IMF 2004 5.0 2004 4.1 0.9 30 2005 2004 2005 2005 2005 2004 2005 IMF 2005 4.3 2004 IMF 2004 2003 3.0 4.3 2003 2 2003 2004 IT 2005 IMF 2005 2004 3.5 IT 1995 10 2.8% 10 2 1 IT IT 2004
More informationSNAと家計調査における貯蓄率の乖離-日本の貯蓄率低下の要因-
RIETI Discussion Paper Series 10-J-003 RIETI Discussion Paper Series 10-J-003 2009 年 12 月 SNA と家計調査における貯蓄率の乖離 - 日本の貯蓄率低下の要因 - 宇南山卓 ( 神戸大学大学院経済学研究科 ) 要 旨 SNA と家計調査から計算される家計貯蓄率の乖離の原因を明らかにし 日本の貯蓄率の低下の原因を考察した
More information物価変動の決定要因について ― 需給ギャップと物価変動の関係の国際比較を中心に―
NAIRU NAIRU NAIRU GDPGDP NAIRUNon- Accelerating Inflation Rate of Unemployment GDP GDP NAIRU Lown and RichFisher, Mahadeva and Whitley raw materials G NAIRUTurnerFai WatanabeNAIRU Watanabe nested NAIRU
More informationOSIPP40_p1_2.eps
2006 年 秋号 No.40 1 2 Asia-Pacific Financial Markets Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies Studies on a Second Generation of Disequilibrium Economics International Economic Integration and
More information2) 3) 2) Ohkusa, 1996 ; 1999 ; Ohtake and Ohkusa, 1994 ; La Croix and A. Kawamura, Reject American Economic Review, Journal of Political Econom
1) IOC Major League Baseball s MLB Blue Ribbon Panel Levin et al. 1) Yamamura and Shin, 2005 a ; 2005 b ; 2005 c communication 2) 3) 2) Ohkusa, 1996 ; 1999 ; Ohtake and Ohkusa, 1994 ; La Croix and A. Kawamura,
More informationBB 報告書完成版_修正版)040415.doc
3 4 5 8 KW Q = AK α W β q = a + α k + βw q = log Q, k = log K, w = logw i P ij v ij P ij = exp( vij ), J exp( v ) k= 1 ik v i j = X β αp + γnu j j j j X j j p j j NU j j NU j (
More information公務員倫理問題への新アプローチ
OECD CPI CPI CPI CPI CPI CPI / GDP / / / /.............................. Transparency International Corruption Perception Index CPI CPI 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
More information物流からみた九州地方の地域的都市システムの変容
Working Paper Series Vol. 2009-05 2009 2 Working Paper 14 10 13 18 194-0298 4342 E-mail pakugen69@hosei.ac.jp 1 Pred 1977 1985 1994 2001 Murayama 1982,1984 Friedmann 1986 1994 2001 1 2 1979 1984 1991 2005
More informationデフレ不況下の金融政策をめぐる政治過程
1991 2003 GDP....................................... http://www.stat.go.jp/ http://www.boj.or.jp/ GDP http://www.esri.cao.go.jp/ GDP - - - inflation targeting Krugman a IS-LM liquidity trap Krugman b Krugman
More information戦間期日本企業の資金調達、資本コスト、資本構成:最適資本構成理論からみた1930年代における企業財務
1930 Modigliani and Miller [1958] 170 1930 2008 7 16 I E-mail: takashi.nanjou@boj.or.jp E-mail: cc00881@srv.cc.hit-u.ac.jp //2009.7 81 1. 1 2 M&A 3 4 1965 1969 1995 1995 1993 1 2008 2008 1985 2006 10 ROA
More informationKobe University Repository : Kernel タイトル Title 著者 Author(s) 掲載誌 巻号 ページ Citation 刊行日 Issue date 資源タイプ Resource Type 版区分 Resource Version 権利 Rights DOI
Kobe University Repository : Kernel タイトル Title 著者 Author(s) 掲載誌 巻号 ページ Citation 刊行日 Issue date 資源タイプ Resource Type 版区分 Resource Version 権利 Rights DOI 成人寿命の増加と国民貯蓄率に関する実証研究 (An Empirical Analysis on Increase
More informationスライド 1
2030 (2004) 1 2 3 1 212004 5.5203031 (1) 2004GDP () 2030GDP )1 2122005 21 2 ASEAN+5 3 207.3EU8.03.3 (2004) 4 10 22.8 16.11 121,006 100 593,369 100 19,715 16 247,813 42 34,217 28 88,772 15 6,832 6 43,746
More informationUNEP sustainable consumption sustainable production 1980 rebound effect rebound effect IO-EHA 1 CO 2 rebound effect CO 2 rebound effect
2005 3 Discussion Paper No. 95 UNEP sustainable consumption sustainable production 1980 rebound effect rebound effect IO-EHA 1 CO 2 rebound effect CO 2 rebound effect 2005 3 1 (Environmental Household
More informationAutumn II III Zon and Muysken 2005 Zon and Muysken 2005 IV II 障害者への所得移転の経済効果 分析に用いるデータ
212 Vol. 44 No. 2 I はじめに 2008 1 2 Autumn 08 213 II III Zon and Muysken 2005 Zon and Muysken 2005 IV II 障害者への所得移転の経済効果 17 18 1 分析に用いるデータ 1 2005 10 12 200 2 2006 9 12 1 1 2 129 35 113 3 1 2 6 1 2 3 4 4 1
More information1 (1997) (1997) 1974:Q3 1994:Q3 (i) (ii) ( ) ( ) 1 (iii) ( ( 1999 ) ( ) ( ) 1 ( ) ( 1995,pp ) 1
1 (1997) (1997) 1974:Q3 1994:Q3 (i) (ii) ( ) ( ) 1 (iii) ( ( 1999 ) ( ) ( ) 1 ( ) ( 1995,pp.218 223 ) 1 2 ) (i) (ii) / (iii) ( ) (i ii) 1 2 1 ( ) 3 ( ) 2, 3 Dunning(1979) ( ) 1 2 ( ) ( ) ( ) (,p.218) (
More information国際流動性に関する財政的側面について
IMF SDR IMF 2011 6 1 2 2011 E-mail: obstfeld@econ.berkeley.edu / /2011.10 35 1. 2007 2009 2 Goodhart [1999] 2010 11 2. 4 1970 IMF 1960 36 /2011.10 international reserve 1 D 35 1 D 35 1960 Eichengreen [2011]
More informationSUSENAS Kor Modul (2) (3) (4)
(1) Survei Sosial Economi NasionalNational Socio-economic Survey SUSENAS Kor Modul (2) (3) (4) SUSENAS SUSENAS SUSENAS / (5) t p t p SUSENAS t SUSENAS SUSENAS t p ( ( t p SUSENAS t SUSENAS (6) Oey-Gardiner
More information財政赤字の経済分析:中長期的視点からの考察
1998 1999 1998 1999 10 10 1999 30 (1982, 1996) (1997) (1977) (1990) (1996) (1997) (1996) Ihori, Doi, and Kondo (1999) (1982) (1984) (1987) (1993) (1997) (1998) CAPM 1980 (time inconsistency) Persson, Persson
More information自殺の経済社会的要因に関する調査研究報告書
17 1 2 3 4 5 11 16 30,247 17 18 21,024 +2.0 6 12 13 WHO 100 14 7 15 2 5 8 16 9 10 17 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 II I 18 Durkheim(1897) Hamermesh&Soss(1974)Dixit&Pindyck(1994) Becker&Posner(2004) Rosenthal(1993)
More informationStepwise Chow Test * Chow Test Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Riddell Riddell first step second step sub-step Step
Stepwise Chow Test * Chow Test Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Riddell Riddell first step second step sub-step Stepwise Chow Test a Stepwise Chow Test Takeuchi 1991Nomura
More information<93638CB48FBA8E6C2E696E6464>
265 29 1 1. 1 19 5 6 4 2 ) 48 21 63 16 51 17 64 10 49 12 67 10 42 15 49 13 49 13 48 13 54.7 59.3 56.7 57.5 65.3 85.1 59.9 63.4 64.0 64.6 45.3 40.7 43.3 42.5 34.7 14.9 40.1 36.6 36.0 35.4 1854 1938 1854
More informationJorgenson F, L : L: Inada lim F =, lim F L = k L lim F =, lim F L = 2 L F >, F L > 3 F <, F LL < 4 λ >, λf, L = F λ, λl 5 Y = Const a L a < α < CES? C
27 nabe@ier.hit-u.ac.jp 27 4 3 Jorgenson Tobin q : Hayashi s Theorem Jordan Saddle Path. GDP % GDP 2. 3. 4.. Tobin q 2 2. Jorgenson F, L : L: Inada lim F =, lim F L = k L lim F =, lim F L = 2 L F >, F
More information企画論文 地域における知識集約型ビジネス支援サービス業 (KIBS) の集積状況と産業連関構造 小林伸生 1. はじめに Knowledge Intensive Business Service: KIBS KIBS KIBS 1980 KIBS KIBS 3 KIBS
企画論文 地域における知識集約型ビジネス支援サービス業 (KIBS) の集積状況と産業連関構造 小林伸生 1. はじめに 1990 2000 2008 Knowledge Intensive Business Service: KIBS KIBS KIBS 1980 KIBS KIBS 3 KIBS 2.KIBS の地域的集積に関する先行研究 KIBS KIBS Shearmur 2010 KIBS
More informationわが国銀行業の将来像― 預金通貨需要からのアプローチによるマクロ的サイズの検討―
M1GDP M2M1 M1GDP M2M1 E-mail: kazuhiko.ishida@boj.or.jp E-mail: hitoshi.mio@boj.or.jp M2GDP Modigliani-Miller: MM Hoshi and Kashyap HKHK HK Quarterly Financial Report for Manufacturing, Mining and Trade
More informationHi-Stat Discussion Paper Series No.248 東京圏における 1990 年代以降の住み替え行動 住宅需要実態調査 を用いた Mixed Logit 分析 小林庸平行武憲史 March 2008 Hitotsubashi University Research Unit
Hi-Stat Discussion Paper Series No.248 東京圏における 1990 年代以降の住み替え行動 住宅需要実態調査 を用いた Logit 分析 小林庸平行武憲史 March 2008 Hitotsubashi University Research Unit for Statistical Analysis in Social Sciences A 21st-Century
More information-February FRB BIS IMF BIS Spillover Spillovers BIS IMF EMEs
BIS FRB BIS BIS FRB QE QE -February FRB BIS IMF BIS Spillover Spillovers BIS IMF EMEs GDP GDP........ GDP BIS, 83rd Annual Report, June 2013, p.14 Ibid., p.14. -February 1 1 2009 2013 2) 2009 2013 2) -7.6-4.0
More informationOSIPP41_p1_2.eps
2007 年 冬 号 No.41 1 2 3 4 Peace Culture Review of Economic Design Journal of Labor Economics Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics Japan and the World Economy Daily Yomiuri Working Paper Series, Center for
More informationCOE-RES Discussion Paper Series Center of Excellence Project The Normative Evaluation and Social Choice of Contemporary Economic Systems Graduate Scho
COE-RES Discussion Paper Series Center of Excellence Project The Normative Evaluation and Social Choice of Contemporary Economic Systems Graduate School of Economics and Institute of Economic Research
More information6) 7) MBO management buy-out 2 necessity sufficiency ) 21
1) 1997 15 02 03 751 1998 8 9 04 1996 16.1% 17.5% 26.9% 64.9% 63.3% 48.9% 2) 02 54.8% 59.0% 61.8% 78.6% 46.5% 1996 17.8% 19.9% 18.7% 42% 11.9% 3) 4) 01 3 1 3 2 03 04 1 TCL 5) Vol. 52, No. 4, October 06
More informationde facto GDP 10 2 IMF remittance ODA FDI % ,701 2, ,620 2,
Iguchi Yasushi 1 21 7 1997 2001 WTO fragmentation ASEAN 32006 55% NAFTA 1 on-shoring off-shoring 2 No. 574 2008 9 13 de facto 2 21 2001 05 1 5 1 3 600 4 1GDP 10 2 IMF remittance ODA FDI 5 1 2000 2005 1000
More informationuntitled
MMRC DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES MMRC-J-7 COE 2004 3 COE E-mail: miyazaki@gbrc.jp 2004 3 ( ) (, 2003; Ulrich, 1995) (2002) 1 Langlois and Robertson (1992) (2001) (Baldwin & Clark, 2000; Sanchez, 2000; Sanchez
More information59-1・2 鳥居昭夫・春日教測 .pwd
logit JEL Classifications: D10, M30, L82 Wilbur 2008 Shishikura et al. 2018 and de Gracia 2012 Bayraktaroglu et al. 2018 Carare and Zentner 2012 Carare and Zentner 2012 Train et al. 1987 Hendel 1999 Spence
More information目次 1. 変化した日韓の位置づけ 年代に拡大した対日貿易赤字 日韓経済関係の新たな動き 拡大均衡に向けて EPA FTA TPP EPA TPP 2 RIM 212 Vol.12 No.44
要 旨 調査部環太平洋戦略研究センター 上席主任研究員 向山英彦 2 FTA 2 11.921 6. 29 1 15 2 6.421 8.1 4.94.1 2 EPA 2 EL FTA EPA RIM 212 Vol.12 No.44 1 目次 1. 変化した日韓の位置づけ 1 2 3 2.2 年代に拡大した対日貿易赤字 1 2 3 3. 日韓経済関係の新たな動き 1 2 4. 拡大均衡に向けて EPA
More information中国引き締め策の対外的影響
ito@nli-research.co.jp 2 2003 2004 9.8 47.8 10.7 84.3 3 1 1 4 5 9.6 9.8 47.8 28.6 84 60.2 30.2 7.5 SARS 15.4 338.83 11.9 726.97 42.7 SARS 10.7 12.8 ( ) 10.9 16.1 1997 6 8.7 11.9 20.7 21.6 16.2 17 7 15.3
More information日本の世帯属性別貯蓄率の動向について:アップデートと考察
RIETI Discussion Paper Series 18-J-024 RIETI Discussion Paper Series 18-J-024 2018 年 8 日本の世帯属性別貯蓄率の動向について : アップデートと考察 1 宇南 卓 ( 経済産業研究所 ) 野太郎 ( 信州 学 ) 要 旨 全国消費実態調査 家計調査 家計消費状況調査を補完的に利用することでマクロ統計と整合的な貯蓄率のデータを構築した宇南山
More information第2章 経済成長と所得分配: マレーシアの事例を中心に
2006 1970 1990 U 1 GDP GDP GDP 1970 1 1969 5 13 5 13 New Economic Policy: NEP NEP 2 NEP 1971 1990 National Development Policy: NDP 1991 2000 Vision Development Policy: VDP 2001 2010 NEP NEP 1990 1980 1
More information商学 65‐5☆/10.上田
635 4 NEM 1990 M&A 1 2 M& A 2013 2014 1 6500 10 3 M&A UFJ Tax Haven 55 ICT FDI 636 UNCTADWorld Investment Report 2011 Non-Equity Modes of International Production and Development Foreign Direct Investment
More informationJICA JETRO
Kyoto Bulletin of Islamic Area Studies, 9 (March 2016), pp. 197 230 JICA JETRO Area Studies TISCO Tata Steel Europe UNDP FS mélange J aime tuffāh uhibbu une pomme camarade A B Ph.D. EU EU EU EU EU EU
More information平成12年度 対日直接投資増加の理由と日本経済にもたらす影響に関する調査 第2章 対日投資と多国籍企業の戦略について
OLI 2-1. 2-1-1. 10% 2-1-2. 20 Hymer 1960 1 2 2 1 Vernon 1966 Smith 1987 Jacquemin 1985 21 Buckley & Casson 1976 Teece 1977 arm s-length internalize 2-1-3. OLI 40 OLI Dunning 1979 2 OLI 3 O: Ownership specific
More informationAutumn 06 1 2005 100 100 1 100 1 2003 2005 10 2003 2005 2
2005 25-2 17 395.6 149.1 1 2004 2 2003p.13 3 Autumn 06 1 2005 100 100 1 100 1 2003 2005 10 2003 2005 2 Vol. 42 No. 2 2 100 20052005 2002 20052005 3 2005 10 1 II III IV 1 1 1 2 1 4 15-2 30 4,091 54.5 2
More information資源紛争概念の再検討
Klare 2001: 25 resource conflict resource war new war Kaldor 1999: 1 1 severity Henderson and Singer 2000: 278 2 5 Paul Collier natural resource wealth natural resource curse Michael T. Klare Mary Kaldor
More information1990年代以降の日本の経済変動
1990 * kenichi.sakura@boj.or.jp ** hitoshi.sasaki@boj.or.jp *** masahiro.higo@boj.or.jp No.05-J-10 2005 12 103-8660 30 * ** *** 1990 2005 12 1990 1990 1990 2005 11 2425 BIS E-mail: kenichi.sakura@boj.or.jp
More informationPublic Investment, the Rate of Return, and Optimal Fiscal Policy Economic Growth Pioneering Economic Theory Mathematical Theories of Economic Growth Review of Economic Studiesvol.27 Econometrica vol.34
More informationTitle 資本のヴィンテージ 研究開発と生産性 Author(s) 徳井, 丞次 ; 乾, 友彦 ; 落合, 勝昭 Citation Issue Date Type Technical Report Text Version publisher URL
Title 資本のヴィンテージ 研究開発と生産性 Author(s) 徳井, 丞次 ; 乾, 友彦 ; 落合, 勝昭 Citation Issue 2007-04 Date Type Technical Report Text Version publisher URL http://hdl.handle.net/10086/13513 Right Hitotsubashi University Repository
More informationKobe University Repository : Kernel タイトル Title 著者 Author(s) 掲載誌 巻号 ページ Citation 刊行日 Issue date 資源タイプ Resource Type 版区分 Resource Version 権利 Rights DOI 日本 メキシコ経済連帯協定の両国間貿易への影響 (< 特集 >FTA/EPA の経済分析 )(Impacts
More information野村資本市場研究所|アジアの金融競争力(PDF)
2013 Spring 1. GDP 3 26% 2. 3. 4. GDP 1 GDP 2000 25.4% 2012 10 IMF 1 GDP 28.7%GDP 10.7% 20.3% 2000 2012 10 2 3 2000 2012 4.2 5.4 2 2000 14% 2012 26% GDP 2012 30 10 32003 11 2013 Spring 100% 2 90% 80% 70%
More information和RIM25_三浦氏.indd
.. 11...... 34 RIM 2007 Vol.7 No.25 2006 71 RIM 2007 Vol.7 No.25 35 1951 50 1997 Piggott and Bei 2007 Hu 20062003 2006 1990 1980 36 RIM 2007 Vol.7 No.25 1991 Pay As You Go: PAYG 1990 Notional Defined Contribution:
More informationheadquarter Gertner et al. winner-picking Wal-Mart s
CJEB The financial strategies of Japanese multinational enterprises and internal capital market, Columbia Business School, CJEB, Working Paper No., April,. headquarter Gertner et al. winner-picking Wal-Mart
More information(1) (Karlan, 2004) (1) (1973) (1978) (1991) (1991) 1
2004 1 8 2005 12 17 1 (1) (Karlan, 2004) 2 3 4 5 E-mail: aa37065@mail.ecc.u-tokyo.ac.jp (1) (1973) (1978) (1991) (1991) 1 2 2 2.1 (, 1978, 7 ) (2) (1988) 38 2 (3) (4) (2) (1986) 91 (1996) 2 1 (1993) 1
More informationResearch on interactive development between Liaoning Five Points, One Line coastal economic belt and hinterland CAO, Zhilai It is an important approach to promote harmonious development of Liaoning economy,
More informationuntitled
Discussion Paper Series No. J73 2006 4 ... 2... 3... 6... 9...12...15 1 2 Christensen and Raynor,2003,2002 ;,2005 2 POS POS 2003 2005 36 POS 32 2003 8 2005 12 29 32 42 3 DVD 42 32 DVD 3 1.20 1.00 0.80
More informationボーナス制度と家計貯蓄率-サーベイ・データによる再検証-
ESRI Discussion Paper Series No.139 by May 2005 Economic and Social Research Instute Cabinet Office Tokyo, Japan * 400 : JEL classification: D12, E21 * 186-8603 2-1 042-580-8369 FAX 042-580-8333 1 Abstract
More information<96D889BA904D2E696E6464>
615 379 1 1995 10 OECD 1995 380 616 57 3 1993 4 3071 2003 1 3247 10 10 4 1 1990 2000 2003 10 617 381 2002 2 3 4 5 2 1 1990 1995 1995 12 1995 IPP Independent Power Producer 1 2004a, b 2005a, b 382 618 57
More informationビールと発泡酒の税率と経済厚生
RIETI Discussion Paper Series 12-J-019 RIETI Discussion Paper Series 12-J-019 2012 年 6 月 ビールと 発 泡 酒 の 税 率 と 経 済 厚 生 * 慶 田 昌 之 ( 立 正 大 学 ) 要 旨 本 稿 では, 近 年 ビール 系 飲 料 として 販 売 されている 発 泡 酒 の 登 場 によって 発 生 している
More information中京大学経済学論叢 23 号 2012 年 3 月 審査論文 1 Keywords: JEL Classi cation: L13, L22, L33 1 * *1 Inoue, Kamijo, and Tomaru (2009) Mukherjee and Suestrong
中京大学経済学論叢 23 号 22 年 3 月 審査論文 Keywords: JEL Classication: L3, L22, L33 * 2373253 * Inoue, Kamijo, and Tomaru (29)Mukherjee and Suestrong (29) Long and Stähler (29)Gil-Molto, Poyago-Theotoky, and Zikos (2)Matsumura
More information,.,,.,. NIRA,.,.,,, GDP.,., 1%, 2.0% 3).,,.,,., 1, 4).,,.,, GDP,.,,.,,,.,,., 2002.,,., 3), Q&A Q16 (http://www.stat.go.jp/data/kakei/qa-1.ht
1, 1, 2011 4 3-28,,.,,.,.,,.,,.,,.,.,. 1., 1), 1946.,, GDP,.,,,.,,., (2008) ( NIRA ), 23,.,,, 2).,,,.,,.,,., 657-8501 2-1, E-mail: unayama@person.kobe-u.ac.jp 1) 1. 2), 1990 2 21, 1993 6 12. 3 1 1 2011
More informationKobe University Repository : Kernel タイトル Title 著者 Author(s) 掲載誌 巻号 ページ Citation 刊行日 Issue date 資源タイプ Resource Type 版区分 Resource Version 権利 Rights DOI
Kobe University Repository : Kernel タイトル Title 著者 Author(s) 掲載誌 巻号 ページ Citation 刊行日 Issue date 資源タイプ Resource Type 版区分 Resource Version 権利 Rights DOI グローバル企業ウェブサイトのマネジメント課題 : 日本企業のサンプルをもとに (Problems on
More information1. 2. (Rowthorn, 2014) / 39 1
,, 43 ( ) 2015 7 18 ( ) E-mail: sasaki@econ.kyoto-u.ac.jp 1 / 39 1. 2. (Rowthorn, 2014) 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 2 / 39 1 ( 1). ( 2). = +. 1. g. r. r > g ( 3).. 3 / 39 2 50% Figure I.1. Income inequality in the
More information.\.....pwd
17 1 1 Thai Automotive Institution: TAI 1996 55 9,428 2005 112 5,316 100 14 18 2 2000 2001 2005 2005 Japanese Chamber of Commerce, Bangkok: JCCB 19 19611989 19902000 2001 3 3 JCCB 1 2 JCCB 3 JCCB 4 JCCB
More information物価指数の計測誤差と品質調整手法:わが国CPIからの教訓
CPICPI CPI CPI CPI CPI Economic Perspective Shiratsukaa Consumer Price IndexCPI CPI CPI CPI CPI Advisory Commission to Study the Consumer Price Index 1996Shiratsuka 1999bHoffmann 1998Cunningham 1996 Crawford
More information日本における財政政策のインパクトー1990年代のイベント・スタディー
FTPL FTPL sustainability FTPL fiscal theory of the price level FTPL Fukuda and Teruyama Giavazzi and Pagan Giavazzi and Pagano Alesina and PerottiSutherlandPerottiGiavazzi, Jappelli and Pagano FTPL LeeperSimsWoodford
More information5 I The Current Situation and Future Prospects of the North Korean Economy presented at the 2014 Korea Dialogue Conference on Strengthenin
5 I. 3 1 1990 2 The Current Situation and Future Prospects of the North Korean Economy presented at the 2014 Korea Dialogue Conference on Strengthening North Pacific Cooperation organized by the East-West
More informationuntitled
2010 158 2010 159 2010 160 2010 161 2010 鍵 162 2010 163 2010 164 2010 165 2010 166 2010 167 2010 168 2010 169 2010 GDP(10 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 ASEAN10 CLMV 0 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 GDP(
More information橡motonishi.PDF
2000 3 ITME Discussion Paper No.26 850-8506 4-2-1 moto@net.nagasaki-u.ac.jp 1 1 MRF 1 (2000) 2 MRF 2 Schreft (1997) 3 2 Tobin (1985) Friedman (1992) 3 3 4 5 3 4 5 2 White (1984) 1 4 (1996) (1999) (1999)
More information, Exchange & Finamce
10 35 50 10 20 1210 18 15 15, 7.5 10 13 50 10 10 10 10 10 10 1225 7.5 10 1.3 10 6.8 5.5 142 25 Exchange & Finamce 1210 10 2.75 2.5 2.5 1210 10 12 1.5 10 10 1.7 1.5 1.5 1.2 1.5 1.5 10 1.4 1.3 1.3 10 12,900
More information