( ) (, ) arxiv: hgm OpenXM search. d n A = (a ij ). A i a i Z d, Z d. i a ij > 0. β N 0 A = N 0 a N 0 a n Z A (β; p) = Au=β,u N n 0 A
|
|
|
- きゅうた いそみ
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 ( ) (, ) arxiv: hgm OpenXM search. d n A = (a ij ). A i a i Z d, Z d. i a ij > 0. β N 0 A = N 0 a N 0 a n Z A (β; p) = Au=β,u N n 0 A-. u! = n i=1 u i!, p u = n i=1 pu i i. Z = Z A Au = β ( ). p u u! (1)
2 Z A (β; p) = 22(2 2 ): A = : û = u = ( p25 3 p12 ( u1 u 2 u 3 u 4 Au=β,u N d ) ( 4 7,..., u = 32 5 p u u!, β = (37, 36, 12) T. u ). Au = β u ) ( 0 11,..., u = 36 1 Z A (β; p) = p !25!12! 2 F 1 ( 11, 12, 26; y), y = p 2p 3 p 1 p 4 (odds ), ( ) 1 1 Ker A = Zā, ā =, u = û + vā y v /(û+vā)! 1 1 2F 1 (y)/û!. ).
3 p(ξ) = (exp ξ 1,..., exp ξ n ), ψ(ξ) = log Z(β; p(ξ)). i = p i. E[U i ] = p i i Z Z p=p(ξ) = ψ(ξ) ξ i, ψ(ξ) ξ i = Au=β u i exp(u ξ)/u! Z ( u ) E[U i ] u i. MLE (Maximal likelihood estimation) : ξ E[U] (Au = β u MLE ). 1 2 MLE? E[U]? 3. 4?
4 ( :,, 2014, ) η i = E[U i ], η = (η i ). ξ- η- ( ) moment map E[U]. : ψ(ξ) (strictly ). ξ ψ(ξ) =: ξ η ψ (ξ ) = maxarg ξ (ξ ξ ψ(ξ)) ψ (ξ ) = ξ. ξ- ξ (η ), dual flat line. D[ξ : ξ ] = ψ(ξ) ψ(ξ ) ψ(ξ )(ξ ξ ) (divergence), D[ξ : ξ ] = D [ξ, ξ ]. : ψ(ξ) = log Z(β; p(ξ)).
5 U = (U 1,..., U n ), Fisher (Fisher s maximal likelihood estimation, MLE), U ( ) pu U! /Z(β, p) p p. Proposition ( ) p Fisher s MLE p E i (p) = p i Z p i /Z = U i.. pu U! /Z(β, p) Ui log p i log U! log Z F. p, F p i = U i p i Z/ p i Z = 0., U i = p i Z/ p i Z.
6 : M.Michalek, B.Sturmfels, C.Uhler, P.Zwiernik, Exponential Varieties, arxiv: : ξ positive definite m m symmetric matrix. x m-, Z(ξ) = exp R m ( 1 2 x T ξx log Z = m 2 log(2π) 1 2 log det(ξ), log Z = 1 2 ξ 1 ) dx = (2π)m/2 det(ξ) 1/2. Positive defifinite symmmetric matrix PD m convex cone. PM m convex cone. ξ ij log Z = 1 2 ξ (maximal likelihood estimation). log R n x i x j exp X ( 1 ) 2 xt ξx dx = 1 2 E[X i X j ] ( exp 1 ) 2 X T ξx /Z
7 ( MLE) (4, 7, 32, 5) β fix ψ., p 2(ξ)p 3 (ξ) p 1 (ξ)p 4 (ξ), MLE odds. ( ) ξ, MLE odds.. 1,,, :, (2010). 2, Algebraic Statistical Methods for Conditional Inference of Discrete Statistical Models, 2015/3, ( ).
8 R (Z n unimodular ), S (Z d unimodular ) α 1 O SAR =... O, α i 0, α i α i+1. O α d Ker(A : Z n Z d ) Z- {Re d+1,..., Re n }, (Re d+i ) T ā i, Ā = λ = Āξ. exp(λ i) = pāi. 22: Ā = ( 1, 1, 1, 1), p 2p 3 p 1 p 4 ā 1. ā n d (n d) n = n j=1 pāij j, odds ( odds = odds )
9 MLE? E[U]? ( ). ξ ξ Im A T. E[U](ξ) = E[U](ξ ). Theorem Newton New(Z) ( Z ξ p ) n d., ( odds log ) moment map. E[U] : R n /Im A T relint(new(z)) R n relint., f (ξ) = η ξ log Z(β, p(ξ)). 22: 25 < E[U 21 ] < 36. (1) MLE..
10 moment map E , generalized odds 2. Z Newton polytope 2.,. p R 2.
..](/docs-images/97/133336984/images/11-1.jpg)
11 moment map E[U](p)..
12 log Z A.. 1 M.Saito, B.Sturmfels, N.Takayama, Hypergeometric polynomials and Integer Programming, Compositio Mathematica, 115 (1999), Holonomic Gradient Method (HGM) (2011 ). Z. HGM= ( ) Z. 3 M.Ogawa, A.Takemura, N.Takayama, An Application of A-hypergeometric Equations to Conditional Maximal Likelihood Estimation of 2 m Contingency Tables, in preparation. D (2015/3 ). 4 Y.Goto, Contiguity Relations of Lauricella s F D Revisited, arxiv: F D 2 m. 5 K.Ohara, N.Takayama, Pfaffian Systems of A-Hypergeometric Systems II Holonomic Gradient Method, arxiv: A-. Macaulay. E[U] before HGM.
13 E[U](ξ)? (k β ). P k (u, ξ) = exp(u ξ) u!z k (ξ), u S k, k = 1, 2,..., S k = {u N n Au = kβ}, Z k (ξ) = exp(u ξ), u! u S k : k? 1 J.Cornfield, A Statistical Problem Arising from Retrospective Studies, Proceedings of 3rd Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability 4 (1956), ,,, R.L.Plackett, Analysis of Categorical Data, 2nd ed, Griffin, (pp. 41 (2 2 table), pp (r s table))
14 : k pu /u! Z(kβ;p)? λ = Āξ, exp(ξ) = p. m = m(λ) ( ) ( IPS (iterative proportional scaling) ). { β = Am, λ = Ā log m. (2) : km. 22, p 2p 3 p 1 p 4 = 1/ h h3
15 Theorem β N 0 A int(r 0 A). M = diag(m i ). ( ) P k (u, ξ) = det(ām 1 Ā T ) 1/2 n (u i km i ) 2 (2πk) (n d)/2 exp 2km i, sup i u i km i <φ(k) i=1 P k (u, ξ) P k (u, ξ) 1 0 (k ), φ(k) : φ(k) = o(k 2/3 ), k/φ(k) 2 = o(1).
16 MLE 1 p = u/ u ( u = u u n ). (m odds λ. 2 E[U](p) m.) 2 ξ dual flat line p. (Ė(U)(ξ) ): 1 Y.Goto, K.Matsumoto, Pfaffian equations and contiguity relations of the hypergeometric function of type (k + 1, k + n + 2) and their applications, arxiv: r 1 r 2 contingency tables HGM (Aomoto-Gel fand E(k, n) twisted cohomology group ). 2 modular method, - -.
17 . A = p 1 p 2 p 4 p 5, 0 p 3 p 6 p 7. p 4 + p 5 + p 6 + p 7, p 1 + p 4 + p 6, p 2 + p 3 + p 5 + p 7, p 1 + p 2 + p 4 + p 5. cell p = exp(ξ)? (MLE, ) p 1, p 2, p 3, p 4. (p 5, p 6, p 7 ). η = (E[U 5 ], E[U 6 ], E[U 7 ]) p η P 0 = (19, 132, 9, 11, 52, 6, 97)/326 ( , , ) P 0 + (0, 0, 0, 0, h 1, h 2, h 3 ) h = ( , , ) ( , , )
Risa/Asir ,,. 2 Yoshihito Tachibana, Yoshiaki Goto, Tamio Koyama, Nobuki Takayama, Holonomic Gradient Method for Two Way Contingency Table
Risa/Asir 2018.03.25 1,,. 2 Yoshihito Tachibana, Yoshiaki Goto, Tamio Koyama, Nobuki Takayama, Holonomic Gradient Method for Two Way Contingency Tables, arxiv:1803.04170 3 import("gtt ekn.rr");. 1 / 12
Mantel-Haenszelの方法
Mantel-Haenszel 2008 6 12 ) 2008 6 12 1 / 39 Mantel & Haenzel 1959) Mantel N, Haenszel W. Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J. Nat. Cancer Inst. 1959; 224):
kato-kuriki-2012-jjas-41-1.pdf
Vol. 41, No. 1 (2012), 1 14 2 / JST CREST T 2 T 2 2 K K K K 2,,,,,. 1. t i y i 2 2 y i = f (t i ; c) + ε i, f (t; c) = c h t h = c ψ(t), i = 1,...,N (1) h=0 c = (c 0, c 1, c 2 ), ψ(t) = (1, t, t 2 ) 3
CVaR
CVaR 20 4 24 3 24 1 31 ,.,.,. Markowitz,., (Value-at-Risk, VaR) (Conditional Value-at-Risk, CVaR). VaR, CVaR VaR. CVaR, CVaR. CVaR,,.,.,,,.,,. 1 5 2 VaR CVaR 6 2.1................................................
I z n+1 = zn 2 + c (c ) c pd L.V. K. 2
I 2012 00-1 I : October 1, 2012 Version : 1.1 3. 10 1 10 15 10 22 1: 10 29 11 5 11 12 11 19 2: 11 26 12 3 12 10 12 17 3: 12 25 1 9 1 21 3 1 I 2012 00-2 z n+1 = zn 2 + c (c ) c http://www.math.nagoya-u.ac.jp/~kawahira/courses/12w-tenbou.html
I ( ) 1 de Broglie 1 (de Broglie) p λ k h Planck ( Js) p = h λ = k (1) h 2π : Dirac k B Boltzmann ( J/K) T U = 3 2 k BT
I (008 4 0 de Broglie (de Broglie p λ k h Planck ( 6.63 0 34 Js p = h λ = k ( h π : Dirac k B Boltzmann (.38 0 3 J/K T U = 3 k BT ( = λ m k B T h m = 0.067m 0 m 0 = 9. 0 3 kg GaAs( a T = 300 K 3 fg 07345
20 9 19 1 3 11 1 3 111 3 112 1 4 12 6 121 6 122 7 13 7 131 8 132 10 133 10 134 12 14 13 141 13 142 13 143 15 144 16 145 17 15 19 151 1 19 152 20 2 21 21 21 211 21 212 1 23 213 1 23 214 25 215 31 22 33
第10章 アイソパラメトリック要素
June 5, 2019 1 / 26 10.1 ( ) 2 / 26 10.2 8 2 3 4 3 4 6 10.1 4 2 3 4 3 (a) 4 (b) 2 3 (c) 2 4 10.1: 3 / 26 8.3 3 5.1 4 10.4 Gauss 10.1 Ω i 2 3 4 Ξ 3 4 6 Ξ ( ) Ξ 5.1 Gauss ˆx : Ξ Ω i ˆx h u 4 / 26 10.2.1
80 X 1, X 2,, X n ( λ ) λ P(X = x) = f (x; λ) = λx e λ, x = 0, 1, 2, x! l(λ) = n f (x i ; λ) = i=1 i=1 n λ x i e λ i=1 x i! = λ n i=1 x i e nλ n i=1 x
80 X 1, X 2,, X n ( λ ) λ P(X = x) = f (x; λ) = λx e λ, x = 0, 1, 2, x! l(λ) = n f (x i ; λ) = n λ x i e λ x i! = λ n x i e nλ n x i! n n log l(λ) = log(λ) x i nλ log( x i!) log l(λ) λ = 1 λ n x i n =
http://www.ike-dyn.ritsumei.ac.jp/ hyoo/wave.html 1 1, 5 3 1.1 1..................................... 3 1.2 5.1................................... 4 1.3.......................... 5 1.4 5.2, 5.3....................
211 kotaro@math.titech.ac.jp 1 R *1 n n R n *2 R n = {(x 1,..., x n ) x 1,..., x n R}. R R 2 R 3 R n R n R n D D R n *3 ) (x 1,..., x n ) f(x 1,..., x n ) f D *4 n 2 n = 1 ( ) 1 f D R n f : D R 1.1. (x,
0. I II I II (1) linear type: GL( ), Sp( ), O( ), (2) loop type: loop current Kac-Moody affine, hyperbolic (3) diffeo t
e-mail: koyama@math.keio.ac.jp 0. I II I II (1) linear type: GL( ), Sp( ), O( ), (2) loop type: loop current Kac-Moody affine, hyperbolic (3) diffeo type: diffeo universal Teichmuller modular I. I-. Weyl
main.dvi
SGC - 70 2, 3 23 ɛ-δ 2.12.8 3 2.92.13 4 2 3 1 2.1 2.102.12 [8][14] [1],[2] [4][7] 2 [4] 1 2009 8 1 1 1.1... 1 1.2... 4 1.3 1... 8 1.4 2... 9 1.5... 12 1.6 1... 16 1.7... 18 1.8... 21 1.9... 23 2 27 2.1
IV (2)
COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS (CFD) IV (2) The Analysis of Numerical Schemes (2) 11. Iterative methods for algebraic systems Reima Iwatsu, e-mail : iwatsu@cck.dendai.ac.jp Winter Semester 2007, Graduate
第5章 偏微分方程式の境界値問題
October 5, 2018 1 / 113 4 ( ) 2 / 113 Poisson 5.1 Poisson ( A.7.1) Poisson Poisson 1 (A.6 ) Γ p p N u D Γ D b 5.1.1: = Γ D Γ N 3 / 113 Poisson 5.1.1 d {2, 3} Lipschitz (A.5 ) Γ D Γ N = \ Γ D Γ p Γ N Γ
2 1,2, , 2 ( ) (1) (2) (3) (4) Cameron and Trivedi(1998) , (1987) (1982) Agresti(2003)
3 1 1 1 2 1 2 1,2,3 1 0 50 3000, 2 ( ) 1 3 1 0 4 3 (1) (2) (3) (4) 1 1 1 2 3 Cameron and Trivedi(1998) 4 1974, (1987) (1982) Agresti(2003) 3 (1)-(4) AAA, AA+,A (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (1)-(5) 1 2 5 3 5 (DI)
Dirac 38 5 Dirac 4 4 γ µ p µ p µ + m 2 = ( p µ γ µ + m)(p ν γ ν + m) (5.1) γ = p µ p ν γ µ γ ν p µ γ µ m + mp ν γ ν + m 2 = 1 2 p µp ν {γ µ, γ ν } + m
Dirac 38 5 Dirac 4 4 γ µ p µ p µ + m 2 p µ γ µ + mp ν γ ν + m 5.1 γ p µ p ν γ µ γ ν p µ γ µ m + mp ν γ ν + m 2 1 2 p µp ν {γ µ, γ ν } + m 2 5.2 p m p p µ γ µ {, } 10 γ {γ µ, γ ν } 2η µν 5.3 p µ γ µ + mp
e a b a b b a a a 1 a a 1 = a 1 a = e G G G : x ( x =, 8, 1 ) x 1,, 60 θ, ϕ ψ θ G G H H G x. n n 1 n 1 n σ = (σ 1, σ,..., σ N ) i σ i i n S n n = 1,,
01 10 18 ( ) 1 6 6 1 8 8 1 6 1 0 0 0 0 1 Table 1: 10 0 8 180 1 1 1. ( : 60 60 ) : 1. 1 e a b a b b a a a 1 a a 1 = a 1 a = e G G G : x ( x =, 8, 1 ) x 1,, 60 θ, ϕ ψ θ G G H H G x. n n 1 n 1 n σ = (σ 1,
20 6 4 1 4 1.1 1.................................... 4 1.1.1.................................... 4 1.1.2 1................................ 5 1.2................................... 7 1.2.1....................................
() x + y + y + x dy dx = 0 () dy + xy = x dx y + x y ( 5) ( s55906) 0.7. (). 5 (). ( 6) ( s6590) 0.8 m n. 0.9 n n A. ( 6) ( s6590) f A (λ) = det(a λi)
0. A A = 4 IC () det A () A () x + y + z = x y z X Y Z = A x y z ( 5) ( s5590) 0. a + b + c b c () a a + b + c c a b a + b + c 0 a b c () a 0 c b b c 0 a c b a 0 0. A A = 7 5 4 5 0 ( 5) ( s5590) () A ()
D = [a, b] [c, d] D ij P ij (ξ ij, η ij ) f S(f,, {P ij }) S(f,, {P ij }) = = k m i=1 j=1 m n f(ξ ij, η ij )(x i x i 1 )(y j y j 1 ) = i=1 j
![D = [a, b] [c, d] D ij P ij (ξ ij, η ij ) f S(f,, {P ij }) S(f,, {P ij }) = = k m i=1 j=1 m n f(ξ ij, η ij )(x i x i 1 )(y j y j 1 ) = i=1 j](/thumbs/103/158001152.jpg "D = [a, b] [c, d] D ij P ij (ξ ij, η ij ) f S(f,, {P ij }) S(f,, {P ij }) = = k m i=1 j=1 m n f(ξ ij, η ij )(x i x i 1 )(y j y j 1 ) = i=1 j")
6 6.. [, b] [, d] ij P ij ξ ij, η ij f Sf,, {P ij } Sf,, {P ij } k m i j m fξ ij, η ij i i j j i j i m i j k i i j j m i i j j k i i j j kb d {P ij } lim Sf,, {P ij} kb d f, k [, b] [, d] f, d kb d 6..
1 filename=mathformula tex 1 ax 2 + bx + c = 0, x = b ± b 2 4ac, (1.1) 2a x 1 + x 2 = b a, x 1x 2 = c a, (1.2) ax 2 + 2b x + c = 0, x = b ± b 2
filename=mathformula58.tex ax + bx + c =, x = b ± b 4ac, (.) a x + x = b a, x x = c a, (.) ax + b x + c =, x = b ± b ac. a (.3). sin(a ± B) = sin A cos B ± cos A sin B, (.) cos(a ± B) = cos A cos B sin
スケーリング理論とはなにか? - --尺度を変えて見えること--
? URL: http://maildbs.c.u-tokyo.ac.jp/ fukushima mailto:hukusima@phys.c.u-tokyo.ac.jp DEX-SMI @ 2006 12 17 ( ) What is scaling theory? DEX-SMI 1 / 40 Outline Outline 1 2 3 4 ( ) What is scaling theory?
,, Andrej Gendiar (Density Matrix Renormalization Group, DMRG) 1 10 S.R. White [1, 2] 2 DMRG ( ) [3, 2] DMRG Baxter [4, 5] 2 Ising 2 1 Ising 1 1 Ising
![,, Andrej Gendiar (Density Matrix Renormalization Group, DMRG) 1 10 S.R. White [1, 2] 2 DMRG ( ) [3, 2] DMRG Baxter [4, 5] 2 Ising 2 1 Ising 1 1 Ising](/thumbs/94/118770363.jpg ",, Andrej Gendiar (Density Matrix Renormalization Group, DMRG) 1 10 S.R. White [1, 2] 2 DMRG ( ) [3, 2] DMRG Baxter [4, 5] 2 Ising 2 1 Ising 1 1 Ising")
,, Andrej Gendiar (Density Matrix Renormalization Group, DMRG) 1 10 S.R. White [1, 2] 2 DMRG ( ) [3, 2] DMRG Baxter [4, 5] 2 Ising 2 1 Ising 1 1 Ising Model 1 Ising 1 Ising Model N Ising (σ i = ±1) (Free
untitled
2 : n =1, 2,, 10000 0.5125 0.51 0.5075 0.505 0.5025 0.5 0.4975 0.495 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 2 weak law of large numbers 1. X 1,X 2,,X n 2. µ = E(X i ),i=1, 2,,n 3. σi 2 = V (X i ) σ 2,i=1, 2,,n ɛ>0
163 KdV KP Lax pair L, B L L L 1/2 W 1 LW = ( / x W t 1, t 2, t 3, ψ t n ψ/ t n = B nψ (KdV B n = L n/2 KP B n = L n KdV KP Lax W Lax τ KP L ψ τ τ Cha
63 KdV KP Lax pair L, B L L L / W LW / x W t, t, t 3, ψ t n / B nψ KdV B n L n/ KP B n L n KdV KP Lax W Lax τ KP L ψ τ τ Chapter 7 An Introduction to the Sato Theory Masayui OIKAWA, Faculty of Engneering,
1 4 1 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) () 1 4 2
7 1995, 2017 7 21 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 6 (1).................................... 6 (2)..................................... 6 (3) t................. 9 5 11 (1)......................................... 11 (2)
II A A441 : October 02, 2014 Version : Kawahira, Tomoki TA (Kondo, Hirotaka )
II 214-1 : October 2, 214 Version : 1.1 Kawahira, Tomoki TA (Kondo, Hirotaka ) http://www.math.nagoya-u.ac.jp/~kawahira/courses/14w-biseki.html pdf 1 2 1 9 1 16 1 23 1 3 11 6 11 13 11 2 11 27 12 4 12 11
(iii) 0 V, x V, x + 0 = x. 0. (iv) x V, y V, x + y = 0., y x, y = x. (v) 1x = x. (vii) (α + β)x = αx + βx. (viii) (αβ)x = α(βx)., V, C.,,., (1)
1. 1.1...,. 1.1.1 V, V x, y, x y x + y x + y V,, V x α, αx αx V,, (i) (viii) : x, y, z V, α, β C, (i) x + y = y + x. (ii) (x + y) + z = x + (y + z). 1 (iii) 0 V, x V, x + 0 = x. 0. (iv) x V, y V, x + y
I A A441 : April 15, 2013 Version : 1.1 I Kawahira, Tomoki TA (Shigehiro, Yoshida )
I013 00-1 : April 15, 013 Version : 1.1 I Kawahira, Tomoki TA (Shigehiro, Yoshida) http://www.math.nagoya-u.ac.jp/~kawahira/courses/13s-tenbou.html pdf * 4 15 4 5 13 e πi = 1 5 0 5 7 3 4 6 3 6 10 6 17
³ÎΨÏÀ
2017 12 12 Makoto Nakashima 2017 12 12 1 / 22 2.1. C, D π- C, D. A 1, A 2 C A 1 A 2 C A 3, A 4 D A 1 A 2 D Makoto Nakashima 2017 12 12 2 / 22 . (,, L p - ). Makoto Nakashima 2017 12 12 3 / 22 . (,, L p
dvi
Recent Advances in Statistical Inference - in Honor of Professor Masafumi Akahira 2008 12 16 Shrinkage estimators for covariance matrices in multivariate complex normal distributions December 12, 2008
北アルプス_燕岳～穂高_－2.doc
1 ( )22 2001 2226 30 1300m 27kg 2 JR 1000 22 10 3 500-400 au 300 N 2763m 4 N N 10 N 500m PM9:00 5 ( 2 ) 7 23 2001 2226 10 N N 40 10 30 6 5m N N N 12 3 49 30 20 2922m 7 K ( ) U S N ( ) 50 15 N 35 (2758m)
E1 (4/12)., ( )., 3,4 ( ). ( ) Allen Hatcher, Vector bundle and K-theory ( HP ) 1
E1 (4/12)., ( )., 3,4 ( ). ( ) Allen Hatcher, Vector bundle and K-theory ( HP ) 1 (4/12) 1 1.. 2. F R C H P n F E n := {((x 0,..., x n ), [v 0 : : v n ]) F n+1 P n F n x i v i = 0 }. i=0 E n P n F P n
ohpmain.dvi
fujisawa@ism.ac.jp 1 Contents 1. 2. 3. 4. γ- 2 1. 3 10 5.6, 5.7, 5.4, 5.5, 5.8, 5.5, 5.3, 5.6, 5.4, 5.2. 5.5 5.6 +5.7 +5.4 +5.5 +5.8 +5.5 +5.3 +5.6 +5.4 +5.2 =5.5. 10 outlier 5 5.6, 5.7, 5.4, 5.5, 5.8,
( ) sin 1 x, cos 1 x, tan 1 x sin x, cos x, tan x, arcsin x, arccos x, arctan x. π 2 sin 1 x π 2, 0 cos 1 x π, π 2 < tan 1 x < π 2 1 (1) (
6 20 ( ) sin, cos, tan sin, cos, tan, arcsin, arccos, arctan. π 2 sin π 2, 0 cos π, π 2 < tan < π 2 () ( 2 2 lim 2 ( 2 ) ) 2 = 3 sin (2) lim 5 0 = 2 2 0 0 2 2 3 3 4 5 5 2 5 6 3 5 7 4 5 8 4 9 3 4 a 3 b
Perturbation method for determining the group of invariance of hierarchical models
Perturbation method for determining the group of invariance of hierarchical models 1 2 1 1 2 2009/11/27 ( ) 2009/11/27 1 / 31 2 3 p 11 p 12 p 13 p 21 p 22 p 23 (p ij 0, i;j p ij = 1). p ij = a i b j log
( ) ( 40 )+( 60 ) Schrödinger 3. (a) (b) (c) yoshioka/education-09.html pdf 1
2009 1 ( ) ( 40 )+( 60 ) 1 1. 2. Schrödinger 3. (a) (b) (c) http://goofy.phys.nara-wu.ac.jp/ yoshioka/education-09.html pdf 1 1. ( photon) ν λ = c ν (c = 3.0 108 /m : ) ɛ = hν (1) p = hν/c = h/λ (2) h
‚åŁÎ“·„´Šš‡ðŠp‡¢‡½‹âfi`fiI…A…‰…S…−…Y…•‡ÌMarkovŸA“½fiI›ð’Í
Markov 2009 10 2 Markov 2009 10 2 1 / 25 1 (GA) 2 GA 3 4 Markov 2009 10 2 2 / 25 (GA) (GA) L ( 1) I := {0, 1} L f : I (0, ) M( 2) S := I M GA (GA) f (i) i I Markov 2009 10 2 3 / 25 (GA) ρ(i, j), i, j I
meiji_resume_1.PDF
β β β (q 1,q,..., q n ; p 1, p,..., p n ) H(q 1,q,..., q n ; p 1, p,..., p n ) Hψ = εψ ε k = k +1/ ε k = k(k 1) (x, y, z; p x, p y, p z ) (r; p r ), (θ; p θ ), (ϕ; p ϕ ) ε k = 1/ k p i dq i E total = E
I, II 1, A = A 4 : 6 = max{ A, } A A 10 10%
1 2006.4.17. A 3-312 tel: 092-726-4774, e-mail: hara@math.kyushu-u.ac.jp, http://www.math.kyushu-u.ac.jp/ hara/lectures/lectures-j.html Office hours: B A I ɛ-δ ɛ-δ 1. 2. A 1. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 2. ɛ-δ 1. ɛ-n
²ÄÀÑʬΥ»¶ÈóÀþ·¿¥·¥å¥ì¡¼¥Ç¥£¥ó¥¬¡¼ÊýÄø¼°¤ÎÁ²¶á²òÀÏ Asymptotic analysis for the integrable discrete nonlinear Schrödinger equation
Asymptotic analysis for the integrable discrete nonlinear Schrödinger equation ( ) ( ) 2016 12 17 1. Schrödinger focusing NLS iu t + u xx +2 u 2 u = 0 u(x, t) =2ηe 2iξx 4i(ξ2 η 2 )t+i(ψ 0 +π/2) sech(2ηx
Morse ( ) 2014
Morse ( ) 2014 1 1 Morse 1 1.1 Morse................................ 1 1.2 Morse.............................. 7 2 12 2.1....................... 12 2.2.................. 13 2.3 Smale..............................
() Remrk I = [0, ] [x i, x i ]. (x : ) f(x) = 0 (x : ) ξ i, (f) = f(ξ i )(x i x i ) = (x i x i ) = ξ i, (f) = f(ξ i )(x i x i ) = 0 (f) 0.
![() Remrk I = [0, ] [x i, x i ]. (x : ) f(x) = 0 (x : ) ξ i, (f) = f(ξ i )(x i x i ) = (x i x i ) = ξ i, (f) = f(ξ i )(x i x i ) = 0 (f) 0.](/thumbs/89/98384840.jpg "() Remrk I = [0, ] [x i, x i ]. (x : ) f(x) = 0 (x : ) ξ i, (f) = f(ξ i )(x i x i ) = (x i x i ) = ξ i, (f) = f(ξ i )(x i x i ) = 0 (f) 0.")
() 6 f(x) [, b] 6. Riemnn [, b] f(x) S f(x) [, b] (Riemnn) = x 0 < x < x < < x n = b. I = [, b] = {x,, x n } mx(x i x i ) =. i [x i, x i ] ξ i n (f) = f(ξ i )(x i x i ) i=. (ξ i ) (f) 0( ), ξ i, S, ε >
1. A0 A B A0 A : A1,...,A5 B : B1,...,B
1. A0 A B A0 A : A1,...,A5 B : B1,...,B12 2. 3. 4. 5. A0 A, B Z Z m, n Z m n m, n A m, n B m=n (1) A, B (2) A B = A B = Z/ π : Z Z/ (3) A B Z/ (4) Z/ A, B (5) f : Z Z f(n) = n f = g π g : Z/ Z A, B (6)
SAMA- SUKU-RU Contents p-adic families of Eisenstein series (modular form) Hecke Eisenstein Eisenstein p T
SAMA- SUKU-RU Contents 1. 1 2. 7.1. p-adic families of Eisenstein series 3 2.1. modular form Hecke 3 2.2. Eisenstein 5 2.3. Eisenstein p 7 3. 7.2. The projection to the ordinary part 9 3.1. The ordinary
x T = (x 1,, x M ) x T x M K C 1,, C K 22 x w y 1: 2 2
Takio Kurita Neurosceince Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Indastrial Science and Technology takio-kurita@aistgojp (Support Vector Machine, SVM) 1 (Support Vector Machine, SVM) ( ) 2
ii 3.,. 4. F. (), ,,. 8.,. 1. (75%) (25%) =7 20, =7 21 (. ). 1.,, (). 3.,. 1. ().,.,.,.,.,. () (12 )., (), 0. 2., 1., 0,.
24(2012) (1 C106) 4 11 (2 C206) 4 12 http://www.math.is.tohoku.ac.jp/~obata,.,,,.. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7.,,. 1., 2007 (). 2. P. G. Hoel, 1995. 3... 1... 2.,,. ii 3.,. 4. F. (),.. 5... 6.. 7.,,. 8.,. 1. (75%)
1
1 Borel1956 Groupes linéaire algébriques, Ann. of Math. 64 (1956), 20 82. Chevalley1956/58 Sur la classification des groupes de Lie algébriques, Sém. Chevalley 1956/58, E.N.S., Paris. Tits1959 Sur la classification
n ξ n,i, i = 1,, n S n ξ n,i n 0 R 1,.. σ 1 σ i .10.14.15 0 1 0 1 1 3.14 3.18 3.19 3.14 3.14,. ii 1 1 1.1..................................... 1 1............................... 3 1.3.........................
No δs δs = r + δr r = δr (3) δs δs = r r = δr + u(r + δr, t) u(r, t) (4) δr = (δx, δy, δz) u i (r + δr, t) u i (r, t) = u i x j δx j (5) δs 2
No.2 1 2 2 δs δs = r + δr r = δr (3) δs δs = r r = δr + u(r + δr, t) u(r, t) (4) δr = (δx, δy, δz) u i (r + δr, t) u i (r, t) = u i δx j (5) δs 2 = δx i δx i + 2 u i δx i δx j = δs 2 + 2s ij δx i δx j
d ϕ i) t d )t0 d ϕi) ϕ i) t x j t d ) ϕ t0 t α dx j d ) ϕ i) t dx t0 j x j d ϕ i) ) t x j dx t0 j f i x j ξ j dx i + ξ i x j dx j f i ξ i x j dx j d )
23 M R M ϕ : R M M ϕt, x) ϕ t x) ϕ s ϕ t ϕ s+t, ϕ 0 id M M ϕ t M ξ ξ ϕ t d ϕ tx) ξϕ t x)) U, x 1,...,x n )) ϕ t x) ϕ 1) t x),...,ϕ n) t x)), ξx) ξ i x) d ϕi) t x) ξ i ϕ t x)) M f ϕ t f)x) f ϕ t )x) fϕ
1 M = (M, g) m Riemann N = (N, h) n Riemann M N C f : M N f df : T M T N M T M f N T N M f 1 T N T M f 1 T N C X, Y Γ(T M) M C T M f 1 T N M Levi-Civi
1 Surveys in Geometry 1980 2 6, 7 Harmonic Map Plateau Eells-Sampson [5] Siu [19, 20] Kähler 6 Reports on Global Analysis [15] Sacks- Uhlenbeck [18] Siu-Yau [21] Frankel Siu Yau Frankel [13] 1 Surveys
振動と波動
Report JS0.5 J Simplicity February 4, 2012 1 J Simplicity HOME http://www.jsimplicity.com/ Preface 2 Report 2 Contents I 5 1 6 1.1..................................... 6 1.2 1 1:................ 7 1.3
1 Tokyo Daily Rainfall (mm) Days (mm)
( ) r-taka@maritime.kobe-u.ac.jp 1 Tokyo Daily Rainfall (mm) 0 100 200 300 0 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 Days (mm) 1876 1 1 2013 12 31 Tokyo, 1876 Daily Rainfall (mm) 0 50 100 150 0 100 200 300 Tokyo,
医系の統計入門第 2 版 サンプルページ この本の定価 判型などは, 以下の URL からご覧いただけます. このサンプルページの内容は, 第 2 版 1 刷発行時のものです.
医系の統計入門第 2 版 サンプルページ この本の定価 判型などは, 以下の URL からご覧いただけます. http://www.morikita.co.jp/books/mid/009192 このサンプルページの内容は, 第 2 版 1 刷発行時のものです. i 2 t 1. 2. 3 2 3. 6 4. 7 5. n 2 ν 6. 2 7. 2003 ii 2 2013 10 iii 1987
201711grade1ouyou.pdf
2017 11 26 1 2 52 3 12 13 22 23 32 33 42 3 5 3 4 90 5 6 A 1 2 Web Web 3 4 1 2... 5 6 7 7 44 8 9 1 2 3 1 p p >2 2 A 1 2 0.6 0.4 0.52... (a) 0.6 0.4...... B 1 2 0.8-0.2 0.52..... (b) 0.6 0.52.... 1 A B 2
1 911 9001030 9:00 A B C D E F G H I J K L M 1A0900 1B0900 1C0900 1D0900 1E0900 1F0900 1G0900 1H0900 1I0900 1J0900 1K0900 1L0900 1M0900 9:15 1A0915 1B0915 1C0915 1D0915 1E0915 1F0915 1G0915 1H0915 1I0915
わが国企業による資金調達方法の選択問題
* takeshi.shimatani@boj.or.jp ** kawai@ml.me.titech.ac.jp *** naohiko.baba@boj.or.jp No.05-J-3 2005 3 103-8660 30 No.05-J-3 2005 3 1990 * E-mailtakeshi.shimatani@boj.or.jp ** E-mailkawai@ml.me.titech.ac.jp
THE INSTITUTE OF ELECTRONICS, INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION ENGINEERS TECHNICAL REPORT OF IEICE. TV A310
THE INSTITUTE OF ELECTRONICS, INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION ENGINEERS TECHNICAL REPORT OF IEICE. TV 367 0035 1011 A310 E-mail kawamura@suou.waseda.jp Total Variation Total Variation Total Variation Abstract
gr09.dvi
.1, θ, ϕ d = A, t dt + B, t dtd + C, t d + D, t dθ +in θdϕ.1.1 t { = f1,t t = f,t { D, t = B, t =.1. t A, tdt e φ,t dt, C, td e λ,t d.1.3,t, t d = e φ,t dt + e λ,t d + dθ +in θdϕ.1.4 { = f1,t t = f,t {
II 2 3.,, A(B + C) = AB + AC, (A + B)C = AC + BC. 4. m m A, m m B,, m m B, AB = BA, A,, I. 5. m m A, m n B, AB = B, A I E, 4 4 I, J, K
II. () 7 F 7 = { 0,, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 }., F 7 a, b F 7, a b, F 7,. (a) a, b,,. (b) 7., 4 5 = 20 = 2 7 + 6, 4 5 = 6 F 7., F 7,., 0 a F 7, ab = F 7 b F 7. (2) 7, 6 F 6 = { 0,, 2, 3, 4, 5 },,., F 6., 0 0 a F
untitled
18 1 2,000,000 2,000,000 2007 2 2 2008 3 31 (1) 6 JCOSSAR 2007pp.57-642007.6. LCC (1) (2) 2 10mm 1020 14 12 10 8 6 4 40,50,60 2 0 1998 27.5 1995 1960 40 1) 2) 3) LCC LCC LCC 1 1) Vol.42No.5pp.29-322004.5.
2 R U, U Hausdorff, R. R. S R = (S, A) (closed), (open). (complete projective smooth algebraic curve) (cf. 2). 1., ( ).,. countable ( 2 ) ,,.,,
15, pp.1-13 1 1.1,. 1.1. C ( ) f = u + iv, (, u, v f ). 1 1. f f x = i f x u x = v y, u y = v x.., u, v u = v = 0 (, f = 2 f x + 2 f )., 2 y2 u = 0. u, u. 1,. 1.2. S, A S. (i) A φ S U φ C. (ii) φ A U φ
x E E E e i ω = t + ikx 0 k λ λ 2π k 2π/λ k ω/v v n v c/n k = nω c c ω/2π λ k 2πn/λ 2π/(λ/n) κ n n κ N n iκ k = Nω c iωt + inωx c iωt + i( n+ iκ ) ωx
x E E E e i ω t + ikx k λ λ π k π/λ k ω/v v n v c/n k nω c c ω/π λ k πn/λ π/(λ/n) κ n n κ N n iκ k Nω c iωt + inωx c iωt + i( n+ iκ ) ωx c κω x c iω ( t nx c) E E e E e E e e κ e ωκx/c e iω(t nx/c) I I
ii
213/214 1 1.,,, 1 21. 2. Pfaffian 1,, 23 35. 3. Borel,,, 37 82. 4. rigidity,,, 83 112. 5. Pfaff,,. 113 134. 1.. JSPS 2528718 ( ). i ii 213.9.2-213.9.3 x t n 2 1 e 1 2 dt HGM (holonomic gradient method)
(a) (b) (c) Canny (d) 1 ( x α, y α ) 3 (x α, y α ) (a) A 2 + B 2 + C 2 + D 2 + E 2 + F 2 = 1 (3) u ξ α u (A, B, C, D, E, F ) (4) ξ α (x 2 α, 2x α y α,
[II] Optimization Computation for 3-D Understanding of Images [II]: Ellipse Fitting 1. (1) 2. (2) (edge detection) (edge) (zero-crossing) Canny (Canny operator) (3) 1(a) [I] [II] [III] [IV ] E-mail sugaya@iim.ics.tut.ac.jp
1 Edward Waring Lagrange n {(x i, y i )} n i=1 x i p i p i (x j ) = δ ij P (x) = p i p i (x) = n y i p i (x) (1) i=1 n j=1 j i x x j x i x j (2) Runge
Edwrd Wring Lgrnge n {(x i, y i )} n x i p i p i (x j ) = δ ij P (x) = p i p i (x) = n y i p i (x) () n j= x x j x i x j (2) Runge [] [2] = ξ 0 < ξ < ξ n = b [, b] [ξ i, ξ i ] y = /( + 25x 2 ) 5 2,, 0,,
) ] [ h m x + y + + V x) φ = Eφ 1) z E = i h t 13) x << 1) N n n= = N N + 1) 14) N n n= = N N + 1)N + 1) 6 15) N n 3 n= = 1 4 N N + 1) 16) N n 4
![) ] [ h m x + y + + V x) φ = Eφ 1) z E = i h t 13) x << 1) N n n= = N N + 1) 14) N n n= = N N + 1)N + 1) 6 15) N n 3 n= = 1 4 N N + 1) 16) N n 4](/thumbs/92/107866707.jpg ") ] [ h m x + y + + V x) φ = Eφ 1) z E = i h t 13) x << 1) N n n= = N N + 1) 14) N n n= = N N + 1)N + 1) 6 15) N n 3 n= = 1 4 N N + 1) 16) N n 4")
1. k λ ν ω T v p v g k = π λ ω = πν = π T v p = λν = ω k v g = dω dk 1) ) 3) 4). p = hk = h λ 5) E = hν = hω 6) h = h π 7) h =6.6618 1 34 J sec) hc=197.3 MeV fm = 197.3 kev pm= 197.3 ev nm = 1.97 1 3 ev
A B P (A B) = P (A)P (B) (3) A B A B P (B A) A B A B P (A B) = P (B A)P (A) (4) P (B A) = P (A B) P (A) (5) P (A B) P (B A) P (A B) A B P
1 1.1 (population) (sample) (event) (trial) Ω () 1 1 Ω 1.2 P 1. A A P (A) 0 1 0 P (A) 1 (1) 2. P 1 P 0 1 6 1 1 6 0 3. A B P (A B) = P (A) + P (B) (2) A B A B A 1 B 2 A B 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 2 3 1.3 A B P (A
TOP URL 1
TOP URL http://amonphys.web.fc2.com/ 1 30 3 30.1.............. 3 30.2........................... 4 30.3...................... 5 30.4........................ 6 30.5.................................. 8 30.6...............................
ohpr.dvi
2003/12/04 TASK PAF A. Fukuyama et al., Comp. Phys. Rep. 4(1986) 137 A. Fukuyama et al., Nucl. Fusion 26(1986) 151 TASK/WM MHD ψ θ ϕ ψ θ e 1 = ψ, e 2 = θ, e 3 = ϕ ϕ E = E 1 e 1 + E 2 e 2 + E 3 e 3 J :
(2) Fisher α (α) α Fisher α ( α) 0 Levi Civita (1) ( 1) e m (e) (m) ([1], [2], [13]) Poincaré e m Poincaré e m Kähler-like 2 Kähler-like
![(2) Fisher α (α) α Fisher α ( α) 0 Levi Civita (1) ( 1) e m (e) (m) ([1], [2], [13]) Poincaré e m Poincaré e m Kähler-like 2 Kähler-like](/thumbs/97/133596579.jpg "(2) Fisher α (α) α Fisher α ( α) 0 Levi Civita (1) ( 1) e m (e) (m) ([1], [2], [13]) Poincaré e m Poincaré e m Kähler-like 2 Kähler-like")
() 10 9 30 1 Fisher α (α) α Fisher α ( α) 0 Levi Civita (1) ( 1) e m (e) (m) ([1], [], [13]) Poincaré e m Poincaré e m Kähler-like Kähler-like Kähler M g M X, Y, Z (.1) Xg(Y, Z) = g( X Y, Z) + g(y, XZ)
waseda2010a-jukaiki1-main.dvi
November, 2 Contents 6 2 8 3 3 3 32 32 33 5 34 34 6 35 35 7 4 R 2 7 4 4 9 42 42 2 43 44 2 5 : 2 5 5 23 52 52 23 53 53 23 54 24 6 24 6 6 26 62 62 26 63 t 27 7 27 7 7 28 72 72 28 73 36) 29 8 29 8 29 82 3
k + (1/2) S k+(1/2) (Γ 0 (N)) N p Hecke T k+(1/2) (p 2 ) S k+1/2 (Γ 0 (N)) M > 0 2k, M S 2k (Γ 0 (M)) Hecke T 2k (p) (p M) 1.1 ( ). k 2 M N M N f S k+
1 SL 2 (R) γ(z) = az + b cz + d ( ) a b z h, γ = SL c d 2 (R) h 4 N Γ 0 (N) {( ) } a b Γ 0 (N) = SL c d 2 (Z) c 0 mod N θ(z) θ(z) = q n2 q = e 2π 1z, z h n Z Γ 0 (4) j(γ, z) ( ) a b θ(γ(z)) = j(γ, z)θ(z)
Milnor 1 ( ), IX,. [KN].,. 2 : (1),. (2). 1 ; 1950, Milnor[M1, M2]. Milnor,,. ([Hil, HM, IO, St] ).,.,,, ( 2 5 )., Milnor ( 4.1)..,,., [CEGS],. Ω m, P
![Milnor 1 ( ), IX,. [KN].,. 2 : (1),. (2). 1 ; 1950, Milnor[M1, M2]. Milnor,,. ([Hil, HM, IO, St] ).,.,,, ( 2 5 )., Milnor ( 4.1)..,,., [CEGS],. Ω m, P](/thumbs/94/118231293.jpg "Milnor 1 ( ), IX,. [KN].,. 2 : (1),. (2). 1 ; 1950, Milnor[M1, M2]. Milnor,,. ([Hil, HM, IO, St] ).,.,,, ( 2 5 )., Milnor ( 4.1)..,,., [CEGS],. Ω m, P")
Milnor 1 ( ), IX,. [KN].,. 2 : (1),. (2). 1 ; 1950, Milnor[M1, M2]. Milnor,,. ([Hil, HM, IO, St] ).,.,,, ( 2 5 )., Milnor ( 4.1)..,,., [CEGS],. Ω m, PC ( 4 5 )., 5, Milnor Milnor., ( 6 )., (I) Z modulo
第8章 位相最適化問題
8 February 25, 2009 1 (topology optimizaiton problem) ( ) H 1 2 2.1 ( ) V S χ S : V {0, 1} S (characteristic function) (indicator function) 1 (x S ) χ S (x) = 0 (x S ) 2.1 ( ) Lipschitz D R d χ Ω (Ω D)
5 Armitage x 1,, x n y i = 10x i + 3 y i = log x i {x i } {y i } 1.2 n i i x ij i j y ij, z ij i j 2 1 y = a x + b ( cm) x ij (i j )
5 Armitage. x,, x n y i = 0x i + 3 y i = log x i x i y i.2 n i i x ij i j y ij, z ij i j 2 y = a x + b 2 2. ( cm) x ij (i j ) (i) x, x 2 σ 2 x,, σ 2 x,2 σ x,, σ x,2 t t x * (ii) (i) m y ij = x ij /00 y
ii 3.,. 4. F. ( ), ,,. 8.,. 1. (75% ) (25% ) =7 24, =7 25, =7 26 (. ). 1.,, ( ). 3.,...,.,.,.,.,. ( ) (1 2 )., ( ), 0., 1., 0,.
(1 C205) 4 10 (2 C206) 4 11 (2 B202) 4 12 25(2013) http://www.math.is.tohoku.ac.jp/~obata,.,,,..,,. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 1., 2007 ( ).,. 2. P. G., 1995. 3. J. C., 1988. 1... 2.,,. ii 3.,. 4. F. ( ),..
.5 z = a + b + c n.6 = a sin t y = b cos t dy d a e e b e + e c e e e + e 3 s36 3 a + y = a, b > b 3 s363.7 y = + 3 y = + 3 s364.8 cos a 3 s365.9 y =,
[ ] IC. r, θ r, θ π, y y = 3 3 = r cos θ r sin θ D D = {, y ; y }, y D r, θ ep y yddy D D 9 s96. d y dt + 3dy + y = cos t dt t = y = e π + e π +. t = π y =.9 s6.3 d y d + dy d + y = y =, dy d = 3 a, b
ばらつき抑制のための確率最適制御
( ) http://wwwhayanuemnagoya-uacjp/ fujimoto/ 2011 3 9 11 ( ) 2011/03/09-11 1 / 46 Outline 1 2 3 4 5 ( ) 2011/03/09-11 2 / 46 Outline 1 2 3 4 5 ( ) 2011/03/09-11 3 / 46 (1/2) r + Controller - u Plant y
D 24 D D D
5 Paper I.R. 2001 5 Paper HP Paper 5 3 5.1................................................... 3 5.2.................................................... 4 5.3.......................................... 6
u = u(t, x 1,..., x d ) : R R d C λ i = 1 := x 2 1 x 2 d d Euclid Laplace Schrödinger N := {1, 2, 3,... } Z := {..., 3, 2, 1,, 1, 2, 3
2 2 1 5 5 Schrödinger i u t + u = λ u 2 u. u = u(t, x 1,..., x d ) : R R d C λ i = 1 := 2 + + 2 x 2 1 x 2 d d Euclid Laplace Schrödinger 3 1 1.1 N := {1, 2, 3,... } Z := {..., 3, 2, 1,, 1, 2, 3,... } Q
2 2 L 5 2. L L L L k.....
L 528 206 2 9 2 2 L 5 2. L........................... 5 2.2 L................................... 7 2............................... 9. L..................2 L k........................ 2 4 I 5 4. I...................................
1 Abstract 2 3 n a ax 2 + bx + c = 0 (a 0) (1) ( x + b ) 2 = b2 4ac 2a 4a 2 D = b 2 4ac > 0 (1) 2 D = 0 D < 0 x + b 2a = ± b2 4ac 2a b ± b 2
1 Abstract n 1 1.1 a ax + bx + c = 0 (a 0) (1) ( x + b ) = b 4ac a 4a D = b 4ac > 0 (1) D = 0 D < 0 x + b a = ± b 4ac a b ± b 4ac a b a b ± 4ac b i a D (1) ax + bx + c D 0 () () (015 8 1 ) 1. D = b 4ac
Jacobson Prime Avoidance
2016 2017 2 22 1 1 3 2 4 2.1 Jacobson................. 4 2.2.................... 5 3 6 3.1 Prime Avoidance....................... 7 3.2............................. 8 3.3..............................
1.2 (Kleppe, cf. [6]). C S 3 P 3 3 S 3. χ(p 3, I C (3)) 1 C, C P 3 ( ) 3 S 3( S 3 S 3 ). V 3 del Pezzo (cf. 2.1), S V, del Pezzo 1.1, V 3 del Pe
![1.2 (Kleppe, cf. [6]). C S 3 P 3 3 S 3. χ(p 3, I C (3)) 1 C, C P 3 ( ) 3 S 3( S 3 S 3 ). V 3 del Pezzo (cf. 2.1), S V, del Pezzo 1.1, V 3 del Pe](/thumbs/86/93804893.jpg "1.2 (Kleppe, cf. [6]). C S 3 P 3 3 S 3. χ(p 3, I C (3)) 1 C, C P 3 ( ) 3 S 3( S 3 S 3 ). V 3 del Pezzo (cf. 2.1), S V, del Pezzo 1.1, V 3 del Pe")
3 del Pezzo (Hirokazu Nasu) 1 [10]. 3 V C C, V Hilbert scheme Hilb V [C]. C V C S V S. C S S V, C V. Hilbert schemes Hilb V Hilb S [S] [C] ( χ(s, N S/V ) χ(c, N C/S )), Hilb V [C] (generically non-reduced)
1 nakayama/print/ Def (Definition ) Thm (Theorem ) Prop (Proposition ) Lem (Lemma ) Cor (Corollary ) 1. (1) A, B (2) ABC
1 http://www.gem.aoyama.ac.jp/ nakayama/print/ Def (Definition ) Thm (Theorem ) Prop (Proposition ) Lem (Lemma ) Cor (Corollary ) 1. (1) A, B (2) ABC r 1 A B B C C A (1),(2),, (8) A, B, C A,B,C 2 1 ABC
st.dvi
9 3 5................................... 5............................. 5....................................... 5.................................. 7.........................................................................
−g”U›ß™ö‡Æ…X…y…N…g…‰
1 / 74 ( ) 2019 3 8 URL: http://www.math.kyoto-u.ac.jp/ ichiro/ 2 / 74 Contents 1 Pearson 2 3 Doob h- 4 (I) 5 (II) 6 (III-1) - 7 (III-2-a) 8 (III-2-b) - 9 (III-3) Pearson 3 / 74 Pearson Definition 1 ρ
液晶の物理１：連続体理論（弾性，粘性）
The Physics of Liquid Crystals P. G. de Gennes and J. Prost (Oxford University Press, 1993) Liquid crystals are beautiful and mysterious; I am fond of them for both reasons. My hope is that some readers
1 8, : 8.1 1, 2 z = ax + by + c ax by + z c = a b +1 x y z c = 0, (0, 0, c), n = ( a, b, 1). f = n i=1 a ii x 2 i + i<j 2a ij x i x j = ( x, A x), f =
1 8, : 8.1 1, z = ax + by + c ax by + z c = a b +1 x y z c = 0, (0, 0, c), n = ( a, b, 1). f = a ii x i + i
p12.dvi
301 12 (2) : 1 (1) dx dt = f(x,t) ( (t 0,t 1,...,t N ) ) h k = t k+1 t k. h k k h. x(t k ) x k. : 2 (2) :1. step. 1 : explicit( ) : ξ k+1 = ξ k +h k Ψ(t k,ξ k,h k ) implicit( ) : ξ k+1 = ξ k +h k Ψ(t k,t
Design of highly accurate formulas for numerical integration in weighted Hardy spaces with the aid of potential theory 1 Ken ichiro Tanaka 1 Ω R m F I = F (t) dt (1.1) Ω m m 1 m = 1 1 Newton-Cotes Gauss
inkiso.dvi
Ken Urai May 19, 2004 5 27 date-event uncertainty risk 51 ordering preordering X X X (preordering) reflexivity x X x x transitivity x, y, z X x y y z x z asymmetric x y y x x = y X (ordering) completeness
…_…C…L…fi…J…o†[fiü“ePDF/−mflF™ƒ
80 80 80 3 3 5 8 10 12 14 14 17 22 24 27 33 35 35 37 38 41 43 46 47 50 50 52 54 56 56 59 62 65 67 71 74 74 76 80 83 83 84 87 91 91 92 95 96 98 98 101 104 107 107 109 110 111 111 113 115