No EITC, Earned Income Tax Credit WTC, Working Tax Credit; CTC, Child Tax Credit GSTC, Goods and Services Tax Credit a2006 b 2
|
|
|
- なお わたぬき
- 7 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 in work tax credit welfare to work ALMPs 1990 *
2 No EITC, Earned Income Tax Credit WTC, Working Tax Credit; CTC, Child Tax Credit GSTC, Goods and Services Tax Credit a2006 b JPITC Japan Income Tax Credit EITC 1971 EITC Harding and Gupta ed. 2007, Zaidi, A., A. Harding, P. Williamson ed Congressional Research Service 2007
3 EITC EITC 1996 ID 2,350 EITC EITC EITC EITC Earned Income EITC EITC EITC phase-in plateau phase-out 3 phase-in plateau phase-out 3 12, , ,657 16, ,279 EITC ,657 2
4 No phase-out EITC phase-in 8 phase-in
5 WTC CTC WTC CTC WTC CTC 2 WTC CTC CTC CTC , EITC CTC WTC WTC 16 WTC WTC Basic element 1,890 Couple and lone parent element 1, hour element EITC 2 WTC CTC 1 Couple and lone parent element 1, hour element Family Income WTC CTC Family Income Family Income EITC HM Revenue and Customs ,
6 No Family Income 6,420 WTC CTC 6, OECD WTC CTC WTC CTC GST GST Goods and Services Tax GST 16 GST 5 GST 32, GST GST GST ,312 GST 32,312 5 GST 13 CTC 6,420 16,040 CTC 50, Department for Work and Pensions Canada Revenue Agency 2009
7 Net income Net income GST JPITC Static Tax Transfer Model JPITC 1 5, ,091 72, JPITC 2 ID ID 18 Net Income
8 No ID JPITC 2 ID ID 1 5,000 9,025 25, , ,000 25,228 JPITC
9 22 23 JPITC 2009 JPITC 1 GST 18 2 EITC 24 WTC CTC GST JPITC 23 JPITC EITC Family Income Net Income 25 WTC
10 No EITC 28 WTC CTC 23 GST EITC 47 WTC CTC 36 GST 78 CTC EITC 1.3 WTC CTC 3.8 GST JPITC JPITC EITC 0.5 WTC CTC 1.5 GST EITC 87.5 WTC CTC GST
11 EITC EITC , EITC EITC EITC 7 WTC CTC WTC , WTC CTC WTC CTC GST , GST GST
12 No EITC phase-in plateau phase-out 3 EITC EITC EITC 17.3 WTC CTC 40 WTC CTC GST 3
13
14 No
15 EITC WTC CTC WTC 2 1 WTC CTC GST
16 No EITC EITC WTC CTC EITC WTC GST GST
17 JPITC EITCWTC, CTC GST Credit EITC 1.3 WTC CTC 3.8 GST 1.1 EITC WTC CTC 1 Canada Revenue Agency 2009, GST HST Credit, Canada Revenue Agency Congressional Research Service 2007, The Earned Income Tax Credit: An Overview, CRS Report for Congress, RL Department for Work and Pensions 2007, Reducing dependency, increasing opportunity: options for the future of welfare to work, U.K. Department for Work and Pensions Eissa, N, and H.W. Hoynes 1998, The Earned Income Tax Credit and the Labour Supply of Married Couples, NBER Working Paper #6856. Harding, A, and A. Gupta ed. 2007, Modeling Our Future: Population Ageing, Social Security and Taxation, International Symposia in Economic Theory and Econometrics, Amsterdam: North-Holland. HM Revenue and Customs 2009, Child Tax Credit and Working Tax Credit-A Guide, HM Revenue and Customs Hoths, V.J, and J.K. Scholz 2001, The Earned Income Tax Credit, NBER Working Paper #8075. Liebman, J.B. 1998, The Impact of the Earned Income Tax Credit on Incentives and Income Distribution,
18 No Tax Policy and the Economy, Vol. 12. OECD 2005, Increasing Financial Incentives to Work: The Role of In-work Benefits, OECD Employment Outlook, Chapter 3. Zaidi, A., A. Harding, P. Williamson ed. 2009, New Frontiers in Microsimulation Modeling, Ashgate 2002EITC Earned Income Tax Credit No. 140 pp vol. 39 pp pp GST pp EITC 11 pp EITC a pp b pp pp No. 190
160_cov.indd
10 2007 610 1. 2 ONS 2005 73 68 5 56 5 10 71 11 15 77 39 22 1969 87 Autumn 2007 No. 160 1980 3 1000 2.1 1961 11.9 1981 2005 13.0 2004 14.1 ONS 2006 1972 14 1 2004 4 1 22 2 40 3 4 2 5 DWP 2006a p.31 2004
No.9 3 4 4 5 6 9 9 13 15 15 17 21 23 27 31 2 1990 95 3 1 1 65 1 50 50 1 (2000) 4 1989 2 20% 26% 90 1 2 89 12 5 95 3 94 96 98 99 5 4 50 4 1 3 5 700 1,200 40 1,000 2 87 70% 15 60% 12 89 50% 5 3 95 1 4 90
448 Vol. 44 No 図
Spring 09 447 概要 2004 1 2 I はじめに 19 2007 1. 34 2006 1. 32 90 1 90 Galor and Weil 1996 1996 1999 90 Sleebos 2003 Apps and Rees 2004 Martínez and Iza 2004 448 Vol. 44 No. 4 2. 20 2. 00 1. 80 1. 60 1. 40
‚å„´561-3“å„´
...... Marks&Spencer British Airways Abbey National 2 3 29 FT a. 4 30 b Pension Benefit Guarantee Corporation c 31 Sea-Land TUPE Ocupational Pensions Regulatory Authority 32 Minimum Funding Requirement
目 次 1. はじめに 2. 各国における給付つき税額控除 2.1 アメリカの EITC 2.2 イギリスの WTC と CTC 2.3 カナダの GST クレジット 3.JPITC モデルの概要 3.1 データセット 3.2 JPITC モデルの推計手法 4. シミュレーション結果 4.1 給付つ
給付つき税額控除による所得保障 Income Tax Credits to provide Income Protections in Japan 2009 年 10 月 白石浩介 1 SHIRAISHI, Kousuke 三菱総合研究所主席研究員 Chief Economist, Mitsubishi Research Institute 要 2 旨 マイクロシミュレーションを用いた給付つき税額控除に関する研究
160_cov.indd
3 1 2 3 1. 2. 2.1 7 3 1996 welfare to work 2. 1 195 196 197 198 99 Autumn 7 No. 16 4. 3.5 3. 2.5 2. 1.5 1..5. 195 1952 1954 1956 1958 196 1962 1964 1966 1968 197 1972 1974 1976 1978 198 1982 1984 1986
Ishi
Ishi HPhttp: // www.mof.go.jp / jouhou / syuzei / siryou /.htm.. or ERTA, TRA ERTA Economic Recovery Tax Act TRA Tax Reform Act Mroz Triest Lindsey Burtless Navrati Lindsey Burtless Navrati CPS Current
1: 合計特殊出生率 出生率の推移 暦年 アメリカドイツフランス スウェーデン日本 Apps and Re
1 1 Galor and Weil (1996) (Sleebos, 2003) 2-1, E-mail: koba@econ.kobe-u.ac.jp 1 1: 合計特殊出生率 2.20 2.00 1.80 1.60 1.40 1.20 1.00 出生率の推移 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 暦年 アメリカドイツフランス スウェーデン日本 1997 1999 2001
C. R. McKenzie 2003 3 2004 ( 38 ) 2 2004 2005 (Keio Household Panel Survey) control group treatment group 1
KEIO UNIVERSITY MARKET QUALITY RESEARCH PROJECT (A 21 st Century Center of Excellence Project) DP2005-020 * C. R. McKenzie** 2003 3 2004 ( 38 ) 2 2004 2005 (Keio Household Panel Survey) control group treatment
Winter 2009 No Lower Earnings Limit
特集 : イギリスの社会保障 - ニューレイバーの 10 年 イギリスの公的 私的年金制度改革 丸谷浩介 I 1 50 1997 II 1. 2 15 Winter 2009 No. 169 8 3 4 1999 1989 8 2. 4 1 2 1 1992 6 16 Lower Earnings Limit1 65 60 1 2 16 2.40 16 2 1 5 1 2 3. 6 1970 State
Winter 図 1 図 OECD OECD OECD OECD 2003
266 Vol. 44 No. 3 I 序論 Mirrlees 1971 Diamond 1998 Saez 2002 Kaplow 2008 1 700 900 1, 300 1, 700 II III IV V II わが国の再分配の状況と国際比較 OECD Forster and Mira d Ercole 2005 2006 2001 Winter 08 267 図 1 図 2 2000 2
所得課税における控除の再分配効果 : マイクロシミュレーションによる分析
Kwansei Gakuin University Rep Title Author(s) 所 得 課 税 における 控 除 の 再 分 配 効 果 : マイクロシミュレーションに よる 分 析 Kaneda, Takayuki, 金 田, 陸 幸 Citation 関 西 学 院 経 済 学 研 究, 43: 29-50 Issue Date 2012-12-20 URL http://hdl.handle.net/10236/10806
292 Vol. 44 No refundable tax credit Mirrlees 1971 Friedman
Winter 08 291 I はじめに Shinozaki 2005 2006 OECD United Nations 2007 OECD 2008 2 1 2006 2005 2 2006 refundable tax credit 2006 292 Vol. 44 No. 3 3 1 2 refundable tax credit 3 10 5 5 10 5 2 1 Mirrlees 1971
Becker 1965 Gronau a a a
1 1 1 1 1 3.3 6 0.43 0.45 2 2002 Becker1965 Gronau1977 1 a 3.3 3.6 6.0 4.9 4.8 3.6 a 7.4 8.4 8.1 7.6 7.5 6.5 0.45 0.43 0.74 0.64 0.64 0.55 1995 a Vol. 42 No. 2 II III IV V VI VII 1 1998Nishioka 199820022002
GDP tax expenditure GDP GDP GDP TANF GDP
特集 : アメリカの社会保障 21 世紀のアメリカ社会保障 渋谷博史 中浜隆 櫻井潤 1 2 3 1 2 1960 1980 1963 1980 Reaganomics 1960 1990 2000 1 21 1960 1980 4 21 1950 1 2 1 2 3 2 1 2 3 3 2 2-1 1 2006 1 GDP 8.9 2 tax expenditure GDP 0.7 0.8 4 3
. 2
4,977,737 39.39 1 . 2 3 . 4 5 6. 7 8. (ICBM) (SLBM) 2000 18 82.69 4,977,737 39.39 4,664,932 36.84 2,925,513 23.10 43.67 30.17 25.89 10 9 2000 22 1996 23 76.04 5,813,699 54.00 2,274,586 21.13 1,603,790
138
138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 Employment Outlook 182 183
スウェーデンにおける勤労所得税額控除のワーキングプア対策としての可能性
Yuka Matsuda / 1 2006 1994 12 2014 2007 2008 2009 2010 2014 2016 1 2 1 3 9 1 4 1 [2010]201 2 [2006] [2010] 3 [2003]333 028 Spring / Feb. 2018 / No.415 5 I 8 6 1 7 2006 1970 1980 2 4 1990 10 9 1998 20006
表紙＿目次.PDF
JIL 2 1980 vol.3 15 3 1 3 15 18 IT 26 28 33 20 OECD 80 90 (1998) (2000) 2 Aghion et al. (1999) OECD 1970 1 2 70 1980 90 1.1 Kuznets U inverted U-shaped hypothesis GNP U 1 18901940 6 3 Kuznets(1955) (1963)
鷲谷先生寄贈リスト.PDF
1939 1946 1958 1961 1980 1947 1953 1962 1913 2 2 19 2003 15 11 27 1935 10 3 1946 21 10 1947 22 4 1950 25 4 1958 33 4 1961 36 5 1980 55 3 4 36 5 Present Conditions of the Child Welfare Work in Japan., 1920
公的年金制度の考え方と抜本改革の方向性.pdf
9 8 1 (1) (9-1-1) (9-1-2) ( ) 9-1-1 9-1-3 1997 ( 9) 97 70 97 70 ( ) 60 60 15 60 97 70 60 ( 15 ) 2 5 3 60 9-1-2 GNP 40 147 60 1 9-1-2 60 60 40 (9-1-3) (9-1-4) ( ) 9-1-3 30 40 9-1-4 60 30 40 (9-1-5) (9-1-6)
.y101211-4.z...Z.I.v24...ren
17 1 2007 2008 3 G D P GDP 564,606 5,158,515 10.9 375,538 1,420,657 26.6 21 350351 18 19 52.71 40.32 93.03 52.7 40.3 2009 38.9 2007 49.2 2009 12 1 15.9 10.8 7.7 13.7 6.8 13.9 4.8 6.1 3.7 5.8 2009 12 1
untitled
financial report - 1 - - 2 - - 3 - - 4 - - 5 - - 6 - - 7 - - 8 - - 9 - - 10 - - 11 - - 12 - - 13 - - 14 - - 15 - - 16 - - 17 - - 18 - - 19 - - 20 - - 21 - - 22 - - 23 - - 24 - - 25 - - 26 - - 27 - -
海外社会保障研究０２０５.doc
1 OECD 1980 1989 1997 2003 9.9% 1996 Seniors Benefit 1998 3100 Old Age Security (OAS) 2.1 1927 Old Age Security Act 20 70 1952 1965 65 1972 CPI 1973 1989 claw back 2.2 OAS 18 40 10 OAS 20 OAS 40 40 OAS
untitled
[ 研究ノート ] 4% 19 19 20 1997a 20 Mitchell, 2002: 123 208 1997b; 2008 2 1960 1980 Abdel-Fadil, 1975; Hansen, 1969; Radwan & Lee, 1986 Abdel-Fadil, 1980; 85 Assaad, 1997 2 Hopkins Hopkins & Westergaard, 1998:
Winter 2012 No. 181 OECD 1 65 2 65 60 2007 68 2011 2011 4 default retirement age Ⅱ 年 金 制 度 の 概 要 1. 基 礎 国 家 年 金 と 年 金 クレジット Basic State Pension Pensio
特 集 : 公 的 年 金 の 支 給 開 始 年 齢 の 引 き 上 げと 高 齢 者 の 所 得 保 障 イギリスにおける 年 金 支 給 開 始 年 齢 の 引 き 上 げと 定 年 制 の 廃 止 丸 谷 浩 介 要 約 イギリスの 年 金 制 度 は 公 的 年 金 と 私 的 年 金 のコンビネーションで 機 能 しており 近 年 は 公 的 年 金 から 私 的 年 金 へと 比 重
1
1 3 5 5 5 DC 9 NISA 20 22 26 26 IRA Roth IRA SEP SIMPLE 27 401(k) 33 529 38 ESOP 40 42 42 ISA 43 49 NEST 52 54 56 56 56 58 58 59 60 61 61 NISA DC 62 NISA 62 DC 63 DC 64 67 67 67 68 69 69 70 70 71 72 NISA
-February GDP GDP
-February GDP GDP - GDP. GDP GDP / GDP DI.. DI..,,. -February (2010=100) 115 110 105 100 95 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 800 350 750 700 300 650 600 250 550
*...........2007-pdf.p
2 1,409 1 2,468 1 583 565 803 8,668 4 3,127 387 978 24 25 26 Individual Services 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 25,000 20,000 4,027 5,066 9,198 12,468 271 2,033 8,687 10,583 4,298 7,177 4,995 12,172 7,099 17,885
Value Added Tax VAT Mirrlees, J. VAT The Mirrlees Review The Structure and Reform of Direct Taxation Report of a Committee chaired by Professor J. E. Meade Dimensions of Tax Design Mirrlees 2010 Tax by
OECD % 1996 Seniors Benefit Old Age Security (OAS) 1927 Old Age Security Act
Title カナダの年金制度 Author(s) 高山, 憲之 Citation Issue 2002-04 Date Type Technical Report Text Version publisher URL http://hdl.handle.net/10086/14400 Right Hitotsubashi University Repository OECD 1980 1989 1997
30 Criminal Injuries Compensation Act (1995) http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1995/53/contents/enacted 31 Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2010 http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2004/28/pdfs/ukpga_20040028_en.pdf
121
Title バングラデシュにおける貧困削減と人間の安全保障 Author(s) 山形, 辰史 Citation 貧困削減と人間の安全保障 東京 国際協力機構国際協力総合研修所 2005 年 11 月 121-137ページ Issue Date 2005-11 URL http://hdl.handle.net/2344/575 Rights < アジア経済研究所学術研究リポジトリ ARRIDE> http://ir.ide.go.jp/
untitled
Discussion Paper Series No. J73 2006 4 ... 2... 3... 6... 9...12...15 1 2 Christensen and Raynor,2003,2002 ;,2005 2 POS POS 2003 2005 36 POS 32 2003 8 2005 12 29 32 42 3 DVD 42 32 DVD 3 1.20 1.00 0.80
Report on Japanese Taxation by the SHOUP MISSION September 15, 1949 S net worth tax,,,
Report on Japanese Taxation by the SHOUP MISSION September 15, 1949 S net worth tax,,, SNA OECD Revenue Statistics OECD National Accounts ineffcicncy polltax Presumption of Correctness
,.,,.,. NIRA,.,.,,, GDP.,., 1%, 2.0% 3).,,.,,., 1, 4).,,.,, GDP,.,,.,,,.,,., 2002.,,., 3), Q&A Q16 (http://www.stat.go.jp/data/kakei/qa-1.ht
1, 1, 2011 4 3-28,,.,,.,.,,.,,.,,.,.,. 1., 1), 1946.,, GDP,.,,,.,,., (2008) ( NIRA ), 23,.,,, 2).,,,.,,.,,., 657-8501 2-1, E-mail: unayama@person.kobe-u.ac.jp 1) 1. 2), 1990 2 21, 1993 6 12. 3 1 1 2011
第１章Word版.PDF
2007 21 1564 1 15 (a) (b) (c) 80 90 90 (a)(b)(c) 90 2 90 90 3.8 13.1 90 2.6 1.2 1998 19982025 0.43 202550 0.94 90 0.14 0.08 0.87 0.91 1.71 2.10 1.93 1.88 3 1998 81 80 90 1.9 2.5 90 0.5 70 3.5 80 2.8 70
<95DB8C9288E397C389C88A E696E6462>
2011 Vol.60 No.2 p.138 147 Performance of the Japanese long-term care benefit: An International comparison based on OECD health data Mie MORIKAWA[1] Takako TSUTSUI[2] [1]National Institute of Public Health,
日本の高齢者世帯の貯蓄行動に関する実証分析
196 2017 * ** ** 1 2 3 JEL Classification Codes D14, D15, E21 Keywords * 28 Hyun- Hoon Lee Robert Owen Kwanho Shin ** 29 196 An Empirical Analysis of the Saving Behavior of Elderly Households in Japan
Winter 2012 No fortnight income test asset test ,663
特集 : 公的年金の支給開始年齢の引き上げと高齢者の所得保障 オーストラリアの年金改革と支給開始年齢の引上げ 西村淳 要約オーストラリアの年金制度は 資力要件付きの税方式の老齢年金と 雇用主に拠出義務を課した積立方式の私的年金であるスーパーアニュエイションの組合せという かなり日本と異なる 世界でも特色のあるものである 2009 年の労働党政権下の改革で 2017 年から2024 年までかけて 老齢年金の支給開始年齢を65
Economic Outlook 79 Pay-as-you-go Pay-as-you-go Pay-as-you-go Pay-as-you-go Girouard and André (2005)van den Noord (2000) Giorno et al (1995) () The Budget and Economic Outlook Fiscal Years 2007 to 2016
untitled
2 21 1984 50 3500 4200 1 3 1 1985 1984 1 2 1984 50 3 2 3 4 1 1989 35 3 4 5 22 3 1 19811984 19841987 1989 1981 1985 13 1984 1984 1986 1985 20 10 1987 10 2 36 1989 65 1989 1953 1985 60 1933 6.71% 43 3.15%53
untitled
1 2 20 2005.1 2005.11 2007.12 3 2007.6 4 2006 31.2 6 4.2 9.6 2 3 17 1 29 EU 2 3 1 37 http://www.meti.go.jp/statistics/ tyo/kaigaizi/result/ 2 2004 1 85 15 35 5.25 2008 7 1 Wall Street Journal 2000 3680
Discussion Paper #
Title 年金制度と生活保護制度 Author(s) 山重, 慎二 ; 高畑, 純一郎 Citation Issue 2009-06 Date Type Technical Report Text Version publisher URL http://hdl.handle.net/10086/17428 Right Hitotsubashi University Repository Discussion
DoCoMo_layout++J
CREATING NEW REVENUE SOURCES 16 19 20 21 22 15 OSAIFU-KEITAI 16 40 20 0 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 94/04 99/02 IT 01/10 5,114 4,636 2,346 06 17 18 +45 18 20 23 27 27 97 99 01 03 05 9% 24% 1,500
Taro-修士論文.PDF
04M3070 1953 28 1957 32 1958 33 1988 63 1989 2002 14 2003 15-1- 2001-2- 50-3- 2001 2000 12 2,693 1995 2,557 2004 1.29 WHO 2.08 1970 1) 14 2006 18 2,774 2000 10 50 59 60 10 10 19 2) 1987 62 1988 63 1 15
ＧＤＰギャップと潜在成長率
2003 output gap 80 1 20 90 20 70 2 1 2 output gap potential output 1 2 (2001) 3 potential rate of growth 2000 Meyer (2000) European Central Bank: (1999b) 2002 10 4 3 (2000) 4 4 () 5 5 5 6 () () 7 Total
......,,,,,,... a OECDa IS Islamic State
Economic Study of Immigration Problem Toshio KOSAKI Abstract This paper considered the issue of acceptance of the foreign worker in the labor market. In Section, I surveyed the immigrant situation of other
橡Taro11-イギリスの税制改革（総合
TheBritain'sTaxreform Kyoji Hashimoto 17.5% . 1980 1989 2000 EU 1989 1997 1999. 1 1979 1988 1990 1995 25% 1996 23% 1979 98% 1984 1988 25% 40% 1993 20 2,000 2,500 1994-1995 3,000 1995 24% 25% 20% 40% 3.9
Research 2 Vol.81, No.22013
2 5 8 12 4 16 14,15 15 17 17 18 19 20 21 22 22 23 24 26 7 11 14 25 29 30 31 27 27 28 32 16 29 31 1 Research 2 Vol.81, No.22013 Vol.81, No.22013 3 P r o d u c t s 4 Vol.81, No.22013 Research Vol.81, No.22013
untitled
2006 Progress Report on the Economic Well-Being of Working-Age People with Disabilities Employment of Disabled People in Europe in 2002 Statistics in Focus Code of Practice on Managing Disability in the
49
\n Title カルドア勧告とは何だったのか - 企業 未分割家族 農 業所得の観点 - Author(s) 五嶋, 陽子, Gotoh, Yoko Citation 商経論叢, 49(1): 49-62 Date 2013-09-10 Type Departmental Bulletin Paper Rights publisher KANAGAWA University Repository
() OECD SNA SNA SNA
< %. % OECD JEL Classification E, H % % () OECD SNA SNA SNA < 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 38.9 35.2 36.0 35.8 33.7 35.0 33.1 34.0 32.5 32.2 35.3 31.2 31.2 30.8 29.1 29.0 31.5 32.0 28.9 32.0 30.1 31.3 27.7 27.0
Income tax (net of income tax credits) a National Insurance contributions) Capital taxes Capital gains tax Inherit
1 VAT Value Added Tax: 17.5% 2000-01 375.6 Income tax 25.5% VAT 15.9% National Insurance contributions) 15.7% VAT Corporation tax 9.0% Petrol duties 6.2% 70% -1- 2000-01 Income tax (net of income tax credits)
2-栗原.TXT
NAOSITE: Nagasaki University's Ac Title カジノ税に関する一考察 Author(s) 栗原, 克文 Citation 經營と經濟, vol.89(1), pp.17-34; 2009 Issue Date 2009-06 URL http://hdl.handle.net/10069/23392 Right This document is downloaded
Hong Kong Special Administrative District sub degree Hong Kong Institute of Education University of Hong KongChinese University of Hong KongCity Unive
NiSHIMURA Fumiko Education Bureau M. Hong Kong Special Administrative District sub degree Hong Kong Institute of Education University of Hong KongChinese University of Hong KongCity University of Hong
04_田平正典.indd
8 61832015 1 61 GKS Becker and Fuest2003 GKS 1 1 1 1 1 3 10 25 NEEDS Financial QUEST 1 2014882013 0.25510.2070.0756 0.3564 10.0756 62 1 Feldstein and Summers1979 Devereux and Griffith2003 Gordon, Kalambokidis
Public Pension and Immigration The Effects of Immigration on Welfare Inequality The immigration of unskilled workers has been analyzed by a considerab
Public Pension and Immigration The Effects of Immigration on Welfare Inequality The immigration of unskilled workers has been analyzed by a considerable amount of research, which has noted an ability distribution.
Federal Emergency Management Agency FEMA FEMA FEMA Disaster Relief Act of 1950 p. 53 pp. 109 110
Federal Emergency Management Agency FEMA FEMA FEMA Disaster Relief Act of 1950 p. 53 pp. 109 110 Presidential Declaration FEMA Robert Theodore Stafford Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency
東アジアへの視点
8 8 1955 1 2 3 1. Sakamoto 2012 2012a b 8 8 2. 2.1 AGI Industrial Structure of the Prefectural Economy in Kyushu Area in Japan: Trend and Future Prediction 56th European Regional Science Association Congress
2017年12月期 決算説明資料
FINANCIAL RESULTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 HIGHLIGHTS OF FISCAL YEAR 2017 3 OUTLOOK ON FISCAL YEAR 2017 4 CONSOLIDATED NET SALES 4.4% 6,000 5,728 5,981 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 3,830
[1964] [1957] Core Peripheral 7 Mangan,John[2000] [1999] [1999]pp7-8 5 [1964]p89 6 Doeringer and
![[1964] [1957] Core Peripheral 7 Mangan,John[2000] [1999] [1999]pp7-8 5 [1964]p89 6 Doeringer and](/thumbs/88/115073126.jpg "[1964] [1957] Core Peripheral 7 Mangan,John[2000] [1999] [1999]pp7-8 5 [1964]p89 6 Doeringer and")
1 2 2 1 Cappelli,Peter[1999] 20 3 1 [1999] 20 1928 1935 1 1965 2003 2 [1998] 3 Cappelli, Peter [1999]p4-1 - 1945 1973 1960 4 [1964] 2 5 1948 [1957] 1960 6 Core Peripheral 7 Mangan,John[2000] 1970 1980
自殺の経済社会的要因に関する調査研究報告書
17 1 2 3 4 5 11 16 30,247 17 18 21,024 +2.0 6 12 13 WHO 100 14 7 15 2 5 8 16 9 10 17 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 II I 18 Durkheim(1897) Hamermesh&Soss(1974)Dixit&Pindyck(1994) Becker&Posner(2004) Rosenthal(1993)
EITC: Earned Income Tax Credit Ⅱ 韓国における雇用動向 , , ,451.41, ,01
Summer 2013 No. 183 特集 : グローバル景気後退と各国の失業者支援政策 韓国における雇用保険制度と失業者支援政策の現状 金明中 要約韓国では雇用のセーフティネットとして1995 年から雇用保険制度 ( 以下 雇用保険 ) が施行されているが 被保険者の対就業者比と対賃金労働者比は2011 年現在それぞれ46.5% と63.8% であり まだ雇用保険の恩恵が受けられない者が多い また
和RIM25_三浦氏.indd
.. 11...... 34 RIM 2007 Vol.7 No.25 2006 71 RIM 2007 Vol.7 No.25 35 1951 50 1997 Piggott and Bei 2007 Hu 20062003 2006 1990 1980 36 RIM 2007 Vol.7 No.25 1991 Pay As You Go: PAYG 1990 Notional Defined Contribution:
商学 ６５‐５☆／１０．上田
635 4 NEM 1990 M&A 1 2 M& A 2013 2014 1 6500 10 3 M&A UFJ Tax Haven 55 ICT FDI 636 UNCTADWorld Investment Report 2011 Non-Equity Modes of International Production and Development Foreign Direct Investment
untitled
IV 1 IV 2 (i) 2 0.13 0.23 1 (i) 3 ( 0.11 0.19 0.5% 2 (ii) 1% (ii) 1,000, 1,000 (1 Q) G A 0.02 {e i ) 1} Q (e 5 1) 0.02 β Ρ (iii) 1 1 QG {e ig ( i G ) 1} QG (e 5 1) Ρ e in e i G n Q e in 1 e i G n 1 1 1
税制改正にともなう家計の所得弾性値 : 高齢者パネルデータによる実証分析
Kwansei Gakuin University Rep Title Author(s) 税制改正にともなう家計の所得弾性値 : 高齢者パネルデータによる実証分析 Uemura, Toshiyuki, 上村, 敏之 ; Kitamura Takayuki, 金田, 陸幸 Citation 経済学論究, 69(4): 1-16 Issue Date 2016-3-20 URL http://hdl.handle.net/10236/14671
高齢化とマクロ投資比率―国際パネルデータを用いた分析―
196 2017 * ** ** ** ** 160 2 2 JEL Classification Codes E21, E22, J11 Keywords * ESRI 28 ESRI 29 3 17 ESRI ** 115 196 Population Aging and Domestic Investment An Analysis Using International Panel Data
村本 孜５１‐８５／５１‐８５
One for all, all for one. One for all, all for one. ( One for all, all for one. ) One for all, all for one. ( One for all, all for one. ) One for all, all for one. Manes, A. (1877~1963) [2006] p. 37 Raiffisen
Tel03-3288-4528
No.2007-7 E-Mailmochinaga.teteusji@jri.co.jp Tel03-3288-4528 70 20 = ( 1995 2001 2002 6 200713 ( OECD Economic Outlook (2005) (2005) (2005) (2004) (2005) (2005) 7 90 0 160 ( 1 ( ( 2004 éé ( 1 12829 2.532
財政のサステナビリティと長期金利の動向
* nakaza-t@hoffman.cc.sophia.ac.jp ** yutaka.soejima@boj.or.jp ()*** **** munehisa.kasuya@boj.or.jp No.03-J-7 2003 10 103-8660 30 * **()******* * ** () *** **** 2003 10 (i) (ii) Keywords: government bonds,
高橋(由)氏_a_4.indd
55 2014 1950 2012 12 22 1977 Abegglen, J. C. OECD, 1958 The Japanese Factory 1 10 1973 Management and Worker 1974 2 OECD 1973 1 Abegglen, J. C. (1958), The Japanese Factory 1958 1982 165 194 2 Abegglen,
untitled
2 1 2 3 1980 1 2003 2.041977 1.77 2004 1.29 2 200560 3 200265-87 87 1990 1993 3 WIN-WIN 88 1990 1 3 4 1980 2003 9 conflict between work and family life national priority 10 National Work and Family Month
Graduate School of Policy and Management, Doshisha University 53 動学的資本税協調と公的資本形成 あらまし Zodrow and Mieszkowski 1986 Wilson 1986 Batina はじめに Zodr
Graduate School of Policy and Management, Doshisha University 53 動学的資本税協調と公的資本形成 あらまし Zodrow and Mieszkowski 1986 Wilson 1986 Batina 2009 1. はじめに Zodrow and Mieszkowski 1986 Wilson 1986 Tax Competition
Summer 2010 No. 171 II GM the United Auto WorkersUAW UAW 57, ,
特集 : アメリカの社会保障 アメリカの年金システム 吉田健三 2 1 1 I. Palme 1990 Espin-Andersen 1990 2003 18 33 Summer 2010 No. 171 II. 1941 1959 18 1966 25 GM 1980 2006 65 40 the United Auto WorkersUAW 2006 27.81 1 2005 2076 2 2
,
JOC , , HP http://www.nta.go.jp pp. 426455 NPO pp. 766810 , Internal Revenue Service 2012 Publication 547, Casualties, Disasters, and Thefts 2012 Returns, pp. www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/p.pdf2013. 3. 20
12号 中島稔哲.pwd
APB APBO net-of-tax method Accounting Principles Board: APB Opinions of the Accounting Principles Board: APBO APBO6 Authoritative Pronouncement American Institute of Accountants: AIA Committee on Accounting
Ichiro KATO In the previous paper, The Tasks and Composition of the Public Fiscal 1 written by Ichiro Kato The Economic Journal of Taka
117 2 Ichiro KATO In the previous paper, The Tasks and Composition of the Public Fiscal 1 written by Ichiro Kato The Economic Journal of Takasaki City University of Economics44-4, the writer introduced
fringe benefit 6565 1 FEHB Federal Employees Health Benefits States Employee Health Benefits Medicare 1965 TitleX VIII of the Social Security Act1966
特 集 :アメリカの 社 会 保 障 アメリカの 医 療 保 障 システム 雇 用 主 提 供 医 療 保 険 の 空 洞 化 とオバマ 医 療 保 険 改 革 長 谷 川 千 春 1980 20 1 2 2009 2010 2 Employer- Sponsored Health Insurance I 65 16 fringe benefit 6565 1 FEHB Federal Employees
Title 最適年金の理論 Author(s) 藤井, 隆雄 ; 林, 史明 ; 入谷, 純 ; 小黒, 一正 Citation Issue Date Type Technical Report Text Version publisher URL
Title 最適年金の理論 Author(s) 藤井, 隆雄 ; 林, 史明 ; 入谷, 純 ; 小黒, 一正 Citation Issue 2012-06 Date Type Technical Report Text Version publisher URL http://hdl.handle.net/10086/23085 Right Hitotsubashi University Repository
商学 ６３‐３☆／６．山本
193 W. A. 1 2 3 1 2 WTO FTA TPP D. P. P. W. A. 194 2 3 Lewis 1954 1982, 1987 1999 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 A B 1987 119 1985 Krugman and Obstfeld 2009 19742006 3 W. A. 195 2 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 A a1 a2 * * i ai i 1, 2
59-72OGUMA.indd
EULCC EU LCC 59 1. EU 1 EU 60 70 6 10.6 2 EU LCC 61 1 62 70 6 10.6 2 EU LCC 2. EU LCC 1 EU LCC EU LCC 63 1 EU LCC 2005 64 70 6 10.6 2 LCC EU LCC 65 2 LCC 66 70 6 10.6 3 LCC 2009 EU LCC 67 3. 68 70 6 10.6
untitled
2006 JPRC,. 59 1984 2 61 1986 4. 9 1997 4 14 2002 4 JR,JT,NTT 1 1 109 44 3,249 311 2,217 1,099 3,658 17 3 65 1 16 16,. 16, 16 12 17 17 9 17 10 12 18 1 18 4 28 18 4 28 22 1 0.354% 30 39 18.3%1 2 1 2,27%.,
PFI（Private Finance Initiative）の有効性に関する一考察
PFI Private Finance Initiative PFI PFI PFI PFI PFI PFI Public Private Partnerships PPPs PFI PFIPFI PFI PPPs PFI PPPs PFI PSC Public Sector Comparator VFM Value for Money PFI Mar. PFI PFI PFI PFI PFI,,
Microsoft Word - KUES-DP docx
Kanagawa University Economic Society Discussion Paper No. 2015-02 2016/03/30 221-8686 3-27-1 E-mail: santa@econ.kanagawa-u.ac.jp 2016 3 30 2 * santa@econ.kanagawa-u.ac.jp 1 1. 1 2. 20 30 2 1 1 35 39 1980
橡浅川美和子.PDF
2000 1April 2001 1 Pattamaporn 2 2 2 1 70 80 1 1 60 70 80 3 80 1-1 70 1April 2001 80 90 IC 97 70 14 1 24 3 70 70 8 80 90 2000 37 30 80 NIES ASEAN GDP 1998/99 1999 69 2 1-1 / 6,725.75 (76) 8,833.28 (100)
< F83582E C0B2D929>
Welfare Society Public Involvement 231 General Theory of Social Welfare Statistics 232 Ethics Ethics 233 Modern Society and Public Quality General Theory of Law 234 General Theory of Law (Include International
GDP 10 GDP +255 +70 2.3 8 +1.8 +64 Bureau of Economic Analysis 2
OECD OECD 1 GDP 10 GDP +255 +70 2.3 8 +1.8 +64 Bureau of Economic Analysis 2 10 20 4.1 1.4 3.7 +0.3 +0.4 Groningen Growth and Development Centre, 60-Industry Database 3 GDP Bureau of Economic Analysis
Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅳ Assertive community treatment - Issues from scientific and clinical literature with implications for practice The Impact of Supported Employment and Working on Clinical and
..,,...,..,...,,.,....,,,.,.,,.,.,,,.,.,.,.,,.,,,.,,,,.,,, Becker., Becker,,,,,, Becker,.,,,,.,,.,.,,
J. of Population Problems. pp.,,,.,.,,. Becker,,.,,.,,.,,.,,,,.,,,.....,,. ..,,...,..,...,,.,....,,,.,.,,.,.,,,.,.,.,.,,.,,,.,,,,.,,, Becker., Becker,,,,,, Becker,.,,,,.,,.,.,, ,,, Becker,,., Becker,
- March
- March ,,, b - Krankenkasse - March...... % % % % % % - - March,.. %........ 施設給付費の内訳 在宅給付費の内訳 第 2 号被保険者の保険料, 31.0% 保険料負担 公費負担 国, 20.0% 都道府県, 17.5% 第 2 号被保険者の保険料, 31.0% 保険料負担 公費負担 国, 25.0% 都道府県, 12.5%