_›ªficŸaŁF
|
|
- けんじ さかど
- 7 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Okada Kazuhiko
2 J Millar, J, What s Wrong with the Maffia Anyway?, in G.Kaminsk (ed.), Economic Transition in Russia and the New States of Eurasia, Bartlomiej, M. E. Shape. Millar, J, p Aoki, M., Toward a Comparative Institutional Analysis, MIT Press, 2001 NTT 2001
3 GDP GDP GDP Kornai,J., Transformational Recession : The Main Causes, Journal of Comparative Economics, Vol. 19, No.1, PCE2001, c.279 PCE 2002 c. 279 PCE 2001, c. 38. PCE 2003, c. 281; PCE 2004, c PCE 2004, c. 175, 359, 418, 611.
4 GDP IMF 11 PCE 2004, c , p.89
5 ,290 3,972 3, ,285 4,916 3, ,582 3,388 1, ,223 7,628 1, ,583 4, ,600 4, ,224 2, , , , ,360.31, , , , , ,876.22, , , , , , , , , , , , , PCE 2004, c. 175, PCE 2004, c PCE 2004, c. 180.
6 , , , , , , , PCE 2004, c PCE 2004, c PCE 2003, c. 185 ; PCE 2004, c. 193.
7 Transition report 2004, European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, p PCE 2004, c pp Stephenson,S., The Russian homeless : old problem-new agenda, in Hutton, S. & G. Redmond(eds.), Poverty in Transition Economies, Routledge, p. 19, p. 29
8 , , , ,190 5, ,141 2, , ,456 1, PCE 2001, c. 546; PCE 2004, c. 588.
9 GDP , , , , ,061 GDP PCE 2001, c. 547 ; PCE 2004, c Pinto, B., Drebentsov, V., & A.Morozov, Dismantling Russia s Nonpayments System : Creating Conditions for Growth, World Bank Technical Paper, No. 471, 2000, p. 2. PCE 2000, c. 538 ; PCE 2001, c. 558 ; PCE 2002, c. 566 ; PCE 2003, c. 582; PCE 2004, c Gaddy, C. G. & Ickes, B, W., Russia s Virtual Economy, Foreign Affairs, Vol.77, No.5, 1998, p. 54, 60.
10 OECD 28 OECD Economic Survey 2000, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, p The Russian Economic Barometer 2003, Russian Academy of Sciences, Institute of World Economy and Institutional Relations, vol. No. 2, p
11 K Gaddy, C. G. & Ickes, B. W., Russia s Virtual Economy, Brooklings Institution Press, 2002, p. 130.
12
野村資本市場研究所|アジアの金融競争力(PDF)
2013 Spring 1. GDP 3 26% 2. 3. 4. GDP 1 GDP 2000 25.4% 2012 10 IMF 1 GDP 28.7%GDP 10.7% 20.3% 2000 2012 10 2 3 2000 2012 4.2 5.4 2 2000 14% 2012 26% GDP 2012 30 10 32003 11 2013 Spring 100% 2 90% 80% 70%
More informationAssociation of South East Asian Nations: ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN
Association of South East Asian Nations: ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN Free Trade Agreement: FTA FTA ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN The European Union: EU
More informationJournal of Economic Behavior & Organization Quarterly Journal of Economics Review of Economics and Statistics Internal Labor Markets and Manpower Analysis Economics of Education Review Journal of Political
More information- 3 - - 4 - - 5 - - 6 - - 7 - - 8 - - 9 - - 10 - - 11 - - 12 - - 13 - 2009 124,219 3,317,500 1:27 2010 66,900 1,413,100 1:21 201051 546 86,173 1:158 2009 4,018 127,282 1:32 2009 1.8 82.7 1:46 2010 5 337
More information金/金
IMF IMF M&A IMF IMF Gerchenkron Gerchenkron unbalanced growth Gerchenkron Johnson development state Hirschman IMF OECD IMF IMF GDP crony capitalism Krugman IMF capital market-based financial system bank-centered
More information;;; ;;; ;; ;; ;; ;; ;; ;; ;; ;; ;;;; ;;;; ;;;; ;;;;; ;;;; ;;;; ;;;; The World Bank Annual Report World Development
More informationuntitled
[ 研究ノート ] 4% 19 19 20 1997a 20 Mitchell, 2002: 123 208 1997b; 2008 2 1960 1980 Abdel-Fadil, 1975; Hansen, 1969; Radwan & Lee, 1986 Abdel-Fadil, 1980; 85 Assaad, 1997 2 Hopkins Hopkins & Westergaard, 1998:
More information橡20内藤仁美.PDF
1 1 2 2 1 2 3 1 2 1997 7 1 30 1 1 2 3 3 3 1 2 365 2003 2 IMF 3 4 1 1 2 2 1 1 1997 7 2 15 97 98 5 30 3 2 1 1 5 1 97 7 10 1 97 7 10 ASEAN4 7 10 366 4 25 35 2.8 2.7 6.8 2 97 10 11 2 10 11 10 7 1983 10 23
More information21 1 2 1 2
21 1 2 1 2 1 2 3 ( ) 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 210 0.0 0.0 22 23 25 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 74 pp.4362003.10 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 141224 14 48 10
More informationGDPギャップと潜在成長率
2003 output gap 80 1 20 90 20 70 2 1 2 output gap potential output 1 2 (2001) 3 potential rate of growth 2000 Meyer (2000) European Central Bank: (1999b) 2002 10 4 3 (2000) 4 4 () 5 5 5 6 () () 7 Total
More information日 本 のFTA 政 策 をめぐる 国 内 政 治 : JSEPA 交 渉 プロセスの Title 分 析 Author(s) 金, ゼンマ Citation 一 橋 法 学, 7(3): 683-719 Issue 2008-11 Date Type Departmental Bulletin Paper Text Version publisher URL http://hdl.handle.net/10086/16369
More informationミレニアム開発目標の現状と課題
hunger G ODA GDP GDP GDP Basic Human Needs GDP...... United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization The World Conference on Education for All a b c d OECD Development Assistance Committee
More informationアジアの資本移動の変化に関するクラスター分析 アジア域内の証券投資活性化に向けて
* ** 199 1 1996-97 relation * ** Seoul conference China and Emerging Asia: Reorganizing the Global Economy? held by KIEP and Seoul National University 26 5 11-12 Hugh Patrick Yung-Chul Park 26 9 9-1 East
More informationJAPAN MARKETING JOURNAL 110 Vol.28 No.22008
JAPAN MARKETING JOURNAL 110 Vol.28 No.22008 JAPAN MARKETING JOURNAL 110 Vol.28 No.22008 JAPAN MARKETING JOURNAL 110 Vol.28 No.22008 JAPAN MARKETING JOURNAL 110 Vol.28 No.22008 JAPAN MARKETING JOURNAL 110
More informationJAPAN MARKETING JOURNAL 123 Vol.31 No.32012
Japan Marketing Academy JAPAN MARKETING JOURNAL 123 Vol.31 No.32012 JAPAN MARKETING JOURNAL 123 Vol.31 No.32012 JAPAN MARKETING JOURNAL 123 Vol.31 No.32012 JAPAN MARKETING JOURNAL 123 Vol.31 No.32012 JAPAN
More informationJAPAN MARKETING JOURNAL 115 Vol.29 No.32010
Japan Marketing Academy JAPAN MARKETING JOURNAL 115 Vol.29 No.32010 JAPAN MARKETING JOURNAL 115 Vol.29 No.32010 JAPAN MARKETING JOURNAL 115 Vol.29 No.32010 JAPAN MARKETING JOURNAL 115 Vol.29 No.32010 JAPAN
More informationIMES DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES Discussion Paper No. 99-J-17 INSTITUTE FOR MONETARY AND ECONOMIC STUDIES BANK OF JAPAN 100-8630 203 IMES Discussion Paper Series 99-J-17 1999 6 * JEL classification E52 E58
More information- March
Grzegorz W. Ko odko TIGER - March - March - March - March - March - March - March - March - March Economist - March - March Economist - March PlanEcon - March - March - March - March - March
More information個人消費支出からみた戦間期の景気変動:LTES個人消費支出の再推計
LTES LTES LTES 1 GNE GDP GDP 1920 LTES GDP LTES 1931 GDP 76 Hi-Stat E-mail: kiyohito.utsunomiya@boj.or.jp / /2009.3 73 1. Long-Term Economic Statistics LTES 1 1971 LTES 2 LTES LTES System of National Accounts
More information中国引き締め策の対外的影響
ito@nli-research.co.jp 2 2003 2004 9.8 47.8 10.7 84.3 3 1 1 4 5 9.6 9.8 47.8 28.6 84 60.2 30.2 7.5 SARS 15.4 338.83 11.9 726.97 42.7 SARS 10.7 12.8 ( ) 10.9 16.1 1997 6 8.7 11.9 20.7 21.6 16.2 17 7 15.3
More information_16_.indd
well-being well-being well-being Cantril Ladder well-being well-being Cantril Self-Anchoring Striving Scale Cantril Ladder Ladder Ladder awellbeing well-being well-being Gallup World Poll World Database
More informationJCOAL journal_Vol4(表紙)_0603
JCOAL Journal vol.4 2006.3 01_ 02_ 12_ 25_ 29_ 33_ 01 JCOAL Journal JCOAL Journal 02 03 JCOAL Journal JCOAL Journal 04 05 JCOAL Journal JCOAL Journal 06 07 JCOAL Journal JCOAL Journal 08 s s s s s s s
More informationKobe University Repository : Kernel タイトル Title 著者 Author(s) 掲載誌 巻号 ページ Citation 刊行日 Issue date 資源タイプ Resource Type 版区分 Resource Version 権利 Rights DOI 日本 メキシコ経済連帯協定の両国間貿易への影響 (< 特集 >FTA/EPA の経済分析 )(Impacts
More information関 志雄 81‐106
V GDP CPI QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ CEIC GDP QQ QQ QQQ QQQ QQ QQQ QQQ QQ QQQ QQ V CEIC 2014 CEIC GDP GDP GDP GDP 2014 S&P S&P QFII QDII (Gill and Kharas, 2007, World Bank, 2012) (Lewis, 1954) (World
More information公務員倫理問題への新アプローチ
OECD CPI CPI CPI CPI CPI CPI / GDP / / / /.............................. Transparency International Corruption Perception Index CPI CPI 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
More information2003年11月9日
ASEAN ASEAN 2005 6 28 ASEAN 1967 5 1984 6 1995 1997 1999 10 ASEAN 2003 1 1 AFTA ASEAN 6 0 5 AFTA AEC ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN WTO FTA ASEAN FTA ASEAN FTA JSEPA FTA ASEAN FTA ASEAN ASEAN FTA ASEAN FTA ASEAN FTA
More information- March IMF IMF IMF ITO The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade
M&A IMF IMF gold tranche - March IMF IMF IMF ITO The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade IMF IMF IMF GATT OECD OECD BITs. - March. U I = I (r m, i, Z * r m i Z * (= Z / Z) I / r m > I / i < I / Z *
More informationアジ研教科書「マクロ安定化」.PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Corbo, V., and S. Fischer, Structural Adjustment, Stabilization and Policy Reform: Domestic and International Finance, in J. Behrman and T. N. Srinivasan, eds., Handbook of Development
More information村本 孜51‐85/51‐85
One for all, all for one. One for all, all for one. ( One for all, all for one. ) One for all, all for one. ( One for all, all for one. ) One for all, all for one. Manes, A. (1877~1963) [2006] p. 37 Raiffisen
More information和RIM28三浦氏_アジア.indd
200711 100 1442 20 2006 WTO 20068,416 2025 1980 108 RIM 2008 Vol.8 No.28 doi moi 1990 19921993 IMF 1995ASEAN NIEs 1990 1997 NIEs 20071 10 ( RIM 2008 Vol.8 No.28 109 JBIC 1996 2005 NIEs World Bank2006 199610
More informationuntitled
82 1 2016 5 3 7 7 12 14 16 15 16 4 16 17 9 14 N 16 17 16 93 93 3 172 18 1570 1576 17 7 13? 16 N 1612 N 1600 3 2 3 N 16 22 94 94 82 1 2016 5 2014 10 212 3 500 Fabian Drixler Mabiki: Infanticide and Population
More information-February GDP GDP
-February GDP GDP - GDP. GDP GDP / GDP DI.. DI..,,. -February (2010=100) 115 110 105 100 95 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 800 350 750 700 300 650 600 250 550
More information-February FRB BIS IMF BIS Spillover Spillovers BIS IMF EMEs
BIS FRB BIS BIS FRB QE QE -February FRB BIS IMF BIS Spillover Spillovers BIS IMF EMEs GDP GDP........ GDP BIS, 83rd Annual Report, June 2013, p.14 Ibid., p.14. -February 1 1 2009 2013 2) 2009 2013 2) -7.6-4.0
More informationBRICs
243 2010 10 1 2 BRICs 244 20 Tokyo International Conference on Africa Development: TICAD Forum of China-Africa Cooperation: FOCAC 1. 1 TICAD 3 1993 10 TICAD 50 5 TICAD 93 2008 245 NGO TICAD TICAD TICAD
More information第4章 ポーランド
20 20 90 90 18 20 77 20 30 1939 200 78 79 39 80 1 50 70 50 56 70 70 81 70 10 73 71 10 80 240 70 80 10 80 81 79 82 82 80 86 80 80 87 89 82 89 250 89 90 2 500 90 83 EU PHARE 90 93 16 3 90 91 4 92 90 84 10
More information1 1 1 [2000]
* 2000 7 26 1 1 1 [2000] 1 2 1 2 2 1 B to C 250000 億円 200000 日本米国 213,200 150000 100000 50000 0 153,600 106,900 71,100 66,620 42,700 43,860 22,500 26,940 15,340 645 3,360 7,730 1998 年 1999 年 2000 年 2001
More information目次 1. 安定成長を続ける経済 2. 顕在化した不動産市況悪化の影響 住宅問題とニュータウン開発 本格化する政府の対策と今後のリスク 1 2 結びに代えて RIM 211 Vol.11 No.41
韓国の不動産市況悪化と政府の対応 要 旨 調査部環太平洋戦略研究センター 上席主任研究員 向山英彦 21 6.2 25 9 2 21 211 211.52 23 2.12.6 21 11 RIM 211 Vol.11 No.41 1 目次 1. 安定成長を続ける経済 2. 顕在化した不動産市況悪化の影響 1 2 3. 住宅問題とニュータウン開発 1 2 3 4. 本格化する政府の対策と今後のリスク
More information本文/YA1063A
Tropical Agriculture Capital and Entrepreneurship in SouthEast Asia legal fiction of agency. In reality, the agency houses were not agents at all Merchant Enterprise in Britain Economic Development with
More information目次はじめにはじめに 1. 厳しい環境が続く韓国経済 世界同時不況の雇用面への影響 持続的成長に向けての政策課題 1 2 結びに代えて GDP.1 8 RIM 29 Vol.9 No.34
景気減速下の韓国における雇用問題 - 求められる雇用創出に向けた新たな成長戦略 要 旨 調査部環太平洋戦略研究センター 上席主任研究員 向山英彦 28 11 35 29 5 29 GDP.1 18.621.9 3.73.9 RIM 29 Vol.9 No.34 7 目次はじめにはじめに 1. 厳しい環境が続く韓国経済 1 2 3 4 2. 世界同時不況の雇用面への影響 1 2 3 3. 持続的成長に向けての政策課題
More information国際流動性に関する財政的側面について
IMF SDR IMF 2011 6 1 2 2011 E-mail: obstfeld@econ.berkeley.edu / /2011.10 35 1. 2007 2009 2 Goodhart [1999] 2010 11 2. 4 1970 IMF 1960 36 /2011.10 international reserve 1 D 35 1 D 35 1960 Eichengreen [2011]
More information8
7 8 9 1 1-1 1-2 2002 1 2000 10 1-3 2002 2 2000 11 2 3 WHO19951979 19952002p.47 4 22 5 12 2-1 18681919 6 1965 13 2-2 19201945 14 15 2-3 19461960 7 16 17 2-4 19611979 GDP 18 1956300 2,000 1960 11 1972 231006
More information伝統的な経済学では、「消費は重要ではあるが、気にしなくてもよい」と考えられてきた
2005 1 2004 SARS 2003 IMF 2004 5.0 2004 4.1 0.9 30 2005 2004 2005 2005 2005 2004 2005 IMF 2005 4.3 2004 IMF 2004 2003 3.0 4.3 2003 2 2003 2004 IT 2005 IMF 2005 2004 3.5 IT 1995 10 2.8% 10 2 1 IT IT 2004
More information村本 孜71‐89/71‐89
MERITUM RICARDIS OECD https://www.jicpa knk.ne.jp/download/image/index.html EU (intellectual capital rating) BCP OECD IR ex.) ex.) ex.) ex.) http://www.meti.go.jp/policy/intellectual_assets/index.htm (intellectual
More information導入
CIRJE-J-120 2004 10 CIRJE http://www.e.u-tokyo.ac.jp/cirje/research/03research02dp_j.html ** *** ** okazaki@e.u-tokyo.ac.jp *** masaki@econ.osaka-u.ac.jp - 1 - History of Production Organizations Abstract
More informationSNAと家計調査における貯蓄率の乖離-日本の貯蓄率低下の要因-
RIETI Discussion Paper Series 10-J-003 RIETI Discussion Paper Series 10-J-003 2009 年 12 月 SNA と家計調査における貯蓄率の乖離 - 日本の貯蓄率低下の要因 - 宇南山卓 ( 神戸大学大学院経済学研究科 ) 要 旨 SNA と家計調査から計算される家計貯蓄率の乖離の原因を明らかにし 日本の貯蓄率の低下の原因を考察した
More informationuntitled
Trade and Trade Finance in the 200809 Financial Crisis, IMF Working Paper WP/11/16., Understanding the Great Trade Collapse of 200809 and the Subsequent Trade Recovery, Economic Perspectives, 2Q/2011.
More information中国の貧困削減と制度的障害
1 1978 1978 2000 2.5 3000 30.7% 3% 2003p.4 1980 1990 1 1994 7 20 8000 1 1 2002 1655 5 2004p.142 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 2 Poverty Line 1978 1984 1 200 2003 637 1 1 1 1985 2 1 1 2100 2001 2003p.56 60% Engel s coefficient
More information43 2000 1964 65 possibilism 1 30 2 3 4 Development Projects Observed 5
43 2000 59 76 Shuichi YANO 1967A.O.Hirschman Development Projects Observed Brookings Institution: Washington, D.C.,1967. 1968 1970 30 1995 11 43 2000 1964 65 possibilism 1 30 2 3 4 Development Projects
More informationはじめに
ASEAN ASEAN 1. ASEAN 1967 5 1984 6 1995 1997 1999 10 ASEAN 2003 1 1 AFTA ASEAN 6 0 5 AFTA AEC ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN WTO FTA ASEAN FTA ASEAN FTA JSEPA FTA ASEAN FTA ASEAN ASEAN FTA ASEAN FTA ASEAN FTA ASEAN
More informationJeffrey Sachs Chang(1998) Steven Radelet and Jeffrey Sachs (1998) 1999 IMF 1999 World Bank 1998 [ 1998 ] 2000 p [ 20
62 1997 1996 1 1 2 1 Jeffrey Sachs1997 2 Chang(1998)Steven Radelet and Jeffrey Sachs (1998) 1999 IMF 1999 World Bank1998 [ 1998 ] 2000p.9196 [ 2003] 21 [ 2002 2000] [ 1998 1999 ] 1 62 21 3 4 5 6 90 7 3
More information........,.,.,..,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,., International Capital Market Litan et al a b c d M&A a a b E- e- Litan et al. : Table Levine World Bank Levine Greenwald et al. B R F R r R R r B R r B R r B R R Stiglitz
More information冷戦後の戦略環境変化とクリントン政権
1998 11 3558 1 21 2 1 Paul D. Wolfowitz, Clinton s First Year, Foreign Affairs, Vol. 73, No. 15 (January/February, 1994). 2 91 36 3 91 G-7 G-7 4 G-7 5 (primacy) 6 1949 1950 1962 10 71 89 11 91 12 3 James
More information27 27 2 9 28 8 2 2 GDP GDP 5.8. GDP 86.2 22 29 5 29 2 5 2 8 2 9 9 9 8 28 8.5 28 8.9 22.6 27 PB PB5.8 GDP 86.2 5 7 6 GDP 7 2 5 7 6 GDP IMF GDP IMF World Economic Outlook Database 28 29 GDP 25.. 8. 97.8
More informationOSIPPニュースレター.indd
Osaka School of International Public Policy OSIPP NEWSLETTER Vol.60 Spring 2012 OSIPP NEWSLETTER vol.60 01 02 OSIPP NEWSLETTER vol.60 OSIPP NEWSLETTER vol.60 03 04 OSIPP NEWSLETTER vol.60 The basic economics
More information高橋(由)氏_a_4.indd
55 2014 1950 2012 12 22 1977 Abegglen, J. C. OECD, 1958 The Japanese Factory 1 10 1973 Management and Worker 1974 2 OECD 1973 1 Abegglen, J. C. (1958), The Japanese Factory 1958 1982 165 194 2 Abegglen,
More informationæ 1 2 3 rentier state s rent æ æ 1 Zanoyan 2 Gambill æ 3 æ 1987 Luciani Beblawi The Rentier State 4 Luciani Beblawi Luciani 40 æ World Development Indicators 10 1 UNDP 10 / æ æ No.37 2004 19 æ Sadowski
More informationボーナス制度と家計貯蓄率-サーベイ・データによる再検証-
ESRI Discussion Paper Series No.139 by May 2005 Economic and Social Research Instute Cabinet Office Tokyo, Japan * 400 : JEL classification: D12, E21 * 186-8603 2-1 042-580-8369 FAX 042-580-8333 1 Abstract
More information5 5 (%) 9. 3 5 3 8. 7. 5. 5.. 5 5 5 3 8 5 3.9 3.. 1/3 1/9 /3 /9 3/3 3/9 /3 /9 5/3
I *1 *1 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) * ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) (JCR) G7 *1) *) (1) JCR AAA ( ) 1 () 5 - IT 1 5 5 (%) 9. 3 5 3 8. 7. 5. 5.. 5 5 5 3 8 5 3.9 3.. 1/3 1/9 /3 /9 3/3 3/9 /3 /9 5/3 1 (%).
More informationuntitled
1 2 (1) (1962) 1972 3 (2) NGO 4 5 6 7 1955 1962 1962 8 1972 MIT 100 9 70 10 ? 11 1/4 3/4 3/4 1/4 5 1 12 1 1 4 FAO 3000 4 1 ODA 1/10 US 1/25 1/2 88 1/7( /WHO ) 12 1980-2000 GDP US 2006 13 Note: North includes
More informationp. 137 p. 136 PIIGS STUPID EC PIIGS EC
p. 137 p. 136 PIIGS STUPID EC PIIGS EC GDP.. EU GDP European Monetary Union since 1848 E U EU EU GDP pp. 63 64 EU Newsweek EU BNP ECB CDS CDS CDS CDS Newsweek CDS ISDA CDS CDS p. 68 p. 107 pp. 107 108
More information野村資本市場研究所|拡大するタイの住宅金融(PDF)
2013 Spring 1. 81 2004 79 2008 2010 10 6,893 10 2011 1 2. 25 15 5 4,000 3. 2006 2001 6,875 2011 2 368 3 2011 6 3 GDP 2011 1943 3836 4. 2010 5 2 5,000 90 30 3 3 5. RMBS 126 2012 ASEAN IMF GDP 2001 1,155
More information和RIM28_向山氏.indd
9ASEAN 23 2615.314.7EU 12.3 27.1 223 2638.1 M&A45.3 2.6 CIS97.5 2 ASEAN 26 RIM 28 Vol.8 No.28 13 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 8 9 14 RIM 28 Vol.8 No.28 ASEAN 2 28 GDP 15 2 199798 5 5 15 1997 98 99 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 World
More information表紙_目次.PDF
JIL 2 1980 vol.3 15 3 1 3 15 18 IT 26 28 33 20 OECD 80 90 (1998) (2000) 2 Aghion et al. (1999) OECD 1970 1 2 70 1980 90 1.1 Kuznets U inverted U-shaped hypothesis GNP U 1 18901940 6 3 Kuznets(1955) (1963)
More information74% , China Labor Watch ,
1. 1992 1980 45.5% 1997 31.0% 2005 1) 2000 4 7.3% 2000: 21 2003 32.7% 2004 12 21 2004 12 21 50% 90% 3,619 560 2,294 957 1992 1 1,134 2003 2 2,214 1 74% 2005 1992 8,150 2004 26 471 2005 China Labor Watch
More information5 I The Current Situation and Future Prospects of the North Korean Economy presented at the 2014 Korea Dialogue Conference on Strengthenin
5 I. 3 1 1990 2 The Current Situation and Future Prospects of the North Korean Economy presented at the 2014 Korea Dialogue Conference on Strengthening North Pacific Cooperation organized by the East-West
More information和RIMNo.22高安氏.indd
NIEsGDP 1990 200436.1 22.365.1 80 GDP 4 RIM 2006 Vol.6 No.22 RIM 2006 Vol.6 No.22 5 NIEs GDP GDP GDP GDP 90 GDP 1951 80 81 90 90 90 2001 2003 GDP 80 90 2001 2002 GDP 87GDP 80 GDP GDP 6 RIM 2006 Vol.6 No.22
More informationWinter 図 1 図 OECD OECD OECD OECD 2003
266 Vol. 44 No. 3 I 序論 Mirrlees 1971 Diamond 1998 Saez 2002 Kaplow 2008 1 700 900 1, 300 1, 700 II III IV V II わが国の再分配の状況と国際比較 OECD Forster and Mira d Ercole 2005 2006 2001 Winter 08 267 図 1 図 2 2000 2
More information07-245_25.indd
Paul Pierson 1980 80 2 3 Green-Pedersen 2002: ch.1 ; Green-Pedersen and Haverland 2002; 2004 1970 70 30 30 2004 13f. 30 80 1994 Dismantling the Welfare State?Pierson 1994 96 World Politics The New Politics
More informationRIETI Highlight VOL.25
RIETI Highlight 2009 SUMMER 25 VOL. Research Digest RIETI 2009 SUMMER VOL. 25 Highlight 1 2 3 5 8 10 12 13 14 19 ResearchDigest 20 24 28 32 36 38 40 41 42 44 45 RIETI Topics 01 CONTENTS 02 RIETI Highlight
More information技術の系統化調査報告「医薬品創製技術の系統化調査」
Systematized Survey on the History of Drug Discovery with Technical Development 2 Kohei Umezu Kohei Umezu 1 83 84 2 2.1 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 2.2 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 2.3 103 104 105 106
More informationPsacharopulos Psacharopulos and Patrinos (1) Byron and Takahashi McMahon and Boediono Duflo (2)
Psacharopulos Psacharopulos and Patrinos (1) Byron and Takahashi McMahon and Boediono Duflo (2) (3) Survei Sosial Economi NasionalNational Socio-economic Survey SUSENAS KorModul (4) SUSENAS (5) (6) t
More information上海協力機構(SCO) 創設の経緯と課題
SCO The Shanghai Cooperation OrganisationSCO 2001 SCO 1960 80 1989 1996 1996 1997 2001 SCO SCO SCO SCO SCO SCO SCO SCO 4 SCO SCO SCO SCO SCO SCO SCO SCO The Shanghai Cooperation OrganisationSCO 2001 SCO
More informationI
takeishi@fri.fujitsu.com 2004 500kW 2005 50kW 26% 2000 3 2004 4 2005 6 9 74 2005 75 2005 2002 1 2002 7 2005 2002 2008 5 2004 500kW 2005 50kW 26% 2000 3 2004 4 2005 6 9 74 2005 75 2005 9 2000 1 3 2 2003
More information46 RIM 2007 Vol.7 No HSBC WTO 2006
19782006 200716.7 2006 2007 RIM 2007 Vol.7 No.27 45 46 RIM 2007 Vol.7 No.27 2003 HSBC 1978 2006 2007 WTO 2006 RIM 2007 Vol.7 No.27 47 2003 10 92 95 98 99 4,000 20032006 2003 225 AMC 150 joint -stock companies
More information2 Saddam Hussain 3 4 2002 75-76% 56% 20% 3 1993 4 2003 13 2
W 2003 5 11 5 23 1 5 9 5 22 2 2001 9 11 1 2003 5 2 12 24 2 1483 1 2 Saddam Hussain 3 4 2002 75-76% 56% 20% 3 1993 http://www.jetro.org.tr/middleeast/special/riyadh_arabjinmei.html 4 2003 13 2 5 6 ( Iraqi
More information商学 63‐3☆/6.山本
193 W. A. 1 2 3 1 2 WTO FTA TPP D. P. P. W. A. 194 2 3 Lewis 1954 1982, 1987 1999 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 A B 1987 119 1985 Krugman and Obstfeld 2009 19742006 3 W. A. 195 2 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 A a1 a2 * * i ai i 1, 2
More informationCHUO UNIVERSITY 3
2 CHUO UNIVERSITY 3 4 CHUO UNIVERSITY 5 6 CHUO UNIVERSITY 7 8 Journal of Economic Behavior and Orgnanization Games and Economic Behavior Journal of Comparative Economics CHUO UNIVERSITY 9 10 CHUO UNIVERSITY
More information1997 2005 2009 22.9 32.0 25.6 22.4 36.0 29.2 23.9 22.0 15.7 HPI-1(%) 20.4 30.7 27.7 12.4 8.5 40 2005-2010 15 (%) 1999-2007 (%) 2006 (%) 2000-2006 19.1 13.1 18.5 5.8 11.3 10.1 27.3 23.7 9.7 5.9 20 40 35
More information平成12年度 対日直接投資増加の理由と日本経済にもたらす影響に関する調査 第2章 対日投資と多国籍企業の戦略について
OLI 2-1. 2-1-1. 10% 2-1-2. 20 Hymer 1960 1 2 2 1 Vernon 1966 Smith 1987 Jacquemin 1985 21 Buckley & Casson 1976 Teece 1977 arm s-length internalize 2-1-3. OLI 40 OLI Dunning 1979 2 OLI 3 O: Ownership specific
More informationuntitled
GCOESOFTLAW-2011-1 1 2 2 * E-mail: keiko.yamamoto@boj.or.jp COE COE ... 1... 4... 4... 4... 5... 6... 7... 10... 12... 14... 15... 17... 17... 17... 18... 20... 20... 20... 22... 23... 25... 28 1 2 2001
More information財政のサステナビリティと長期金利の動向
* nakaza-t@hoffman.cc.sophia.ac.jp ** yutaka.soejima@boj.or.jp ()*** **** munehisa.kasuya@boj.or.jp No.03-J-7 2003 10 103-8660 30 * **()******* * ** () *** **** 2003 10 (i) (ii) Keywords: government bonds,
More information5 西村成弘/P62‐78
Owen D. Young as an Entrepreneur 1. The General Electric History, 1876-1986, Annual Report 2. 3. 4. é é é à á é é é ü ä ü ü ä á Electric-Power Industry: Supply of Electrical Equipment and Competitive
More information移行経済諸国の農地問題 - 東欧の事例を中心として -
- - restitution 1 1 1999 11 2000 3 2000 3 6 1 1) 2) "restitution" 2 property rights Swinnen and Mathijs 1997, p.369 3 . 1) 2) Davidova et al. 1997, p.50 1 4 1997,131-133 1991 2 2 1999 2 Zlatov Orsov 5
More information橡同居選択における所得の影響(DP原稿).PDF
** *** * 2000 13 ** *** (1) (2) (1986) - 1 - - 2 - (1986) Ohtake (1991) (1993) (1994) (1996) (1997) (1997) Hayashi (1997) (1999) 60 Ohtake (1991) 86 (1996) 89 (1997) 92 (1999) 95 (1993) 86 89 74 79 (1986)
More informationCOC 1) 10% 24.2 34.2 COC+ (52%), 31% 17%, 52%, https://passnavi.evidus.com/search_univ/ 1 1/4, 54%, 46% 28, https://passnavi.evidus.com/search_univ/ 2) 2009 2009 3 73.8%36.6% 16.2%70.3% 2010 3 2008 (%)
More information90 37 20 1439 09 1 1899 1917 1925 1999 1997 2009 2009 38 70 80 90 21 2008 2 Web 21 11 28 4,402 246,847 39 20 1929 J M 1936 3 2009 10 20 4 1998 14.5% 2001 15.3% 2004 14.9% 2007 15.7% 2000 OECD 10.6 14.9
More information株式分割払込制度と企業金融、設備投資の関係について ─1930年代初において株式追加払込が果たした役割を中心に─
IMES DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES Discussion Paper No. 2007-J-20 INSTITUTE FOR MONETARY AND ECONOMIC STUDIES BANK OF JAPAN 103-8660 30 http://www.imes.boj.or.jp IMES Discussion Paper Series 2007-J-20 2007
More information