DP/02-2 Discussion Paper, Version 1, JEL classification : G21, G

DP/03-1 15 3 2 4 () 4 () 5 () 6 7 () 7 () 9 () 11 12 () 12 () 13 () 15 () 18 20 () 20 () 22 () 24 25 26 27 1

DP/03-1 Director General for Economic Assessment and Policy Analysis CABINET OFFICE E-mail: takehiko.tsuji@mfs.cao.go.jp DP/03-1 15 3 2 4 () 4 () 5 () 6 7 () 7 () 9 () 11 12 () 12 () 13 () 15 () 18 20

DP/16-01

第一次大戦後の日本における国債流通市場の制度改革

IMES DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES Discussion Paper No. 2009-J-23 INSTITUTE FOR MONETARY AND ECONOMIC STUDIES BANK OF JAPAN 103-8660 2-1-1 http://www.imes.boj.or.jp IMES Discussion Paper Series 2009-J-23 2009

わが国銀行業の将来像― 預金通貨需要からのアプローチによるマクロ的サイズの検討―

M1GDP M2M1 M1GDP M2M1 E-mail: kazuhiko.ishida@boj.or.jp E-mail: hitoshi.mio@boj.or.jp M2GDP Modigliani-Miller: MM Hoshi and Kashyap HKHK HK Quarterly Financial Report for Manufacturing, Mining and Trade

-February FRB BIS IMF BIS Spillover Spillovers BIS IMF EMEs

BIS FRB BIS BIS FRB QE QE -February FRB BIS IMF BIS Spillover Spillovers BIS IMF EMEs GDP GDP........ GDP BIS, 83rd Annual Report, June 2013, p.14 Ibid., p.14. -February 1 1 2009 2013 2) 2009 2013 2) -7.6-4.0

provider_020524_2.PDF

1 1 1 2 2 3 (1) 3 (2) 4 (3) 6 7 7 (1) 8 (2) 21 26 27 27 27 28 31 32 32 36 1 1 2 2 (1) 3 3 4 45 (2) 6 7 5 (3) 6 7 8 (1) ii iii iv 8 * 9 10 11 9 12 10 13 14 15 11 16 17 12 13 18 19 20 (2) 14 21 22 23 24

生活設計レジメ

44 4 I (1) ( ) (10 15 ) ( 17 ) ( 3 1 ) (2)

(1) I 44 II 45 III 47 IV 52 44 4 I (1) ( ) 1945 8 9 (10 15 ) ( 17 ) ( 3 1 ) (2) 45 II 1 (3) 511 ( 451 1 ) ( ) 365 1 2 512 1 2 365 1 2 363 2 ( ) 3 ( ) ( 451 2 ( 314 1 ) ( 339 1 4 ) 337 2 3 ) 363 (4) 46

I II III 28 29

i ii i iii iv 1 3 3 10 14 17 17 18 22 23 28 29 31 36 37 39 40 43 48 59 70 75 75 77 90 95 102 107 109 110 118 125 128 130 132 134 48 43 43 51 52 61 61 64 62 124 70 58 3 10 17 29 78 82 85 102 95 109 iii

PDFŠpŒ{Ł¶

Shinkin Central Bank Monthly Review 2003.12 hinkin Central Bank Monthly Review 200312 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Community Banker 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36

日本経済新聞社編『経済学の巨人危機と闘う─達人が読み解く先人の知恵』

2012 309pp. Yasuo Suzuki / I 2008 4 3-16 1 2 3 174 2013 winter / No.398 4 5 6 7 8 J S 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 II 9 2011 11 9 9 16 175 6-8 1 1 1 2 7 13 15 10 280 281-286 176 2013 winter / No.398 281 286-298

IMES DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES Discussion Paper No. 99-J-17 INSTITUTE FOR MONETARY AND ECONOMIC STUDIES BANK OF JAPAN 100-8630 203 IMES Discussion Paper Series 99-J-17 1999 6 * JEL classification E52 E58

高齢化とマクロ投資比率―国際パネルデータを用いた分析―

196 2017 * ** ** ** ** 160 2 2 JEL Classification Codes E21, E22, J11 Keywords * ESRI 28 ESRI 29 3 17 ESRI ** 115 196 Population Aging and Domestic Investment An Analysis Using International Panel Data

ii

ＧＤＰギャップと潜在成長率

2003 output gap 80 1 20 90 20 70 2 1 2 output gap potential output 1 2 (2001) 3 potential rate of growth 2000 Meyer (2000) European Central Bank: (1999b) 2002 10 4 3 (2000) 4 4 () 5 5 5 6 () () 7 Total

野村資本市場研究所｜国際基準との調和も踏まえた米国SIFI規制（PDF）

SIFI 1. FRB 2011 12 20 500 FRB SIFI 500 FRB 2. SIFI FRB G-SIB 2016 LCR NSFR 3. SIFI 25 SIFI 10 2 SIFI 4. SIFI 83 2012 Winter FRB FRB 2011 12 20 1 SIFIFRB 2011 4 6 2012 165 (a) interconnected 500 bank holding

橡motonishi.PDF

2000 3 ITME Discussion Paper No.26 850-8506 4-2-1 moto@net.nagasaki-u.ac.jp 1 1 MRF 1 (2000) 2 MRF 2 Schreft (1997) 3 2 Tobin (1985) Friedman (1992) 3 3 4 5 3 4 5 2 White (1984) 1 4 (1996) (1999) (1999)

03.™ƒ−ÔŁñ“’

BIS BIS, Implications for Central Banks of the Development of Electronic Money, 1996. IC IC IC BC BA IC IC ATM ATM BIS POS IC IC ICICIC ECOM ECOM face-to-face IC Berger, A. N., D. Hancock, and J. C.

中国引き締め策の対外的影響

ito@nli-research.co.jp 2 2003 2004 9.8 47.8 10.7 84.3 3 1 1 4 5 9.6 9.8 47.8 28.6 84 60.2 30.2 7.5 SARS 15.4 338.83 11.9 726.97 42.7 SARS 10.7 12.8 ( ) 10.9 16.1 1997 6 8.7 11.9 20.7 21.6 16.2 17 7 15.3

Autumn 06 1 2005 100 100 1 100 1 2003 2005 10 2003 2005 2

2005 25-2 17 395.6 149.1 1 2004 2 2003p.13 3 Autumn 06 1 2005 100 100 1 100 1 2003 2005 10 2003 2005 2 Vol. 42 No. 2 2 100 20052005 2002 20052005 3 2005 10 1 II III IV 1 1 1 2 1 4 15-2 30 4,091 54.5 2

5 5 (%) 9. 3 5 3 8. 7. 5. 5.. 5 5 5 3 8 5 3.9 3.. 1/3 1/9 /3 /9 3/3 3/9 /3 /9 5/3

I *1 *1 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) * ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) (JCR) G7 *1) *) (1) JCR AAA ( ) 1 () 5 - IT 1 5 5 (%) 9. 3 5 3 8. 7. 5. 5.. 5 5 5 3 8 5 3.9 3.. 1/3 1/9 /3 /9 3/3 3/9 /3 /9 5/3 1 (%).

ペイオフ解禁のための処方箋

2001 4 1 2001 1 1 2 2000 4 3 4 5 2002 3 8 9 6 2001 4 1 2001 4 2001 4 2 2001 1 3 2001 3 1 1 3 4 4 6 6 8 8 9 10 12 12 12 13 13 14 14 14 15 16 17 29 37 1996 11 97 11 2001 4 1 2 2001 4 1 2000 4 2001 3 1 2

デフレの定義（最新版）.PDF

DP/01-1 Director General for Economic Assessment and Policy Analysis CABINET OFFICE E-mail : naoki.okamoto@mfs.cao.go.jp 1 2 3 i (ii) 4 5 Deflation defined as at least two consecutive years of price decreases.

1 st 2 nd Dec.2007 Keio Economic Observatory Occasional Paper J.No.28 1993 pp4-54 2

1 st 2 nd Dec.2007 Keio Economic Observatory Occasional Paper J.No.28 1993 pp4-54 2 1 st 2 nd Dec.2007 3 1 st 2 nd Dec.2007 4 1 st 2 nd Dec.2007 10 5 1 st 2 nd Dec.2007 1 1 2005 1-1 18 P. 6 1 st 2 nd Dec.2007

........,.,.,..,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,., International Capital Market Litan et al a b c d M&A a a b E- e- Litan et al. : Table Levine World Bank Levine Greenwald et al. B R F R r R R r B R r B R r B R R Stiglitz

86 7 I ( 13 ) II ( )

10 I 86 II 86 III 89 IV 92 V 2001 93 VI 95 86 7 I 2001 6 12 10 2001 ( 13 ) 10 66 2000 2001 4 100 1 3000 II 1988 1990 1991 ( ) 500 1994 2 87 1 1994 2 1000 1000 1000 2 1994 12 21 1000 700 5 800 ( 97 ) 1000

i

14 i ii iii iv v vi 14 13 86 13 12 28 14 16 14 15 31 (1) 13 12 28 20 (2) (3) 2 (4) (5) 14 14 50 48 3 11 11 22 14 15 10 14 20 21 20 (1) 14 (2) 14 4 (3) (4) (5) 12 12 (6) 14 15 5 6 7 8 9 10 7

Wide Scanner TWAIN Source ユーザーズガイド

本邦株式市場の流動性に関する動学的考察―東京証券取引所のティック・データ分析―

tightnessdepth resiliency BIS Market Liquidity: Research Findings and Selected Policy Implications BISWorld Wide Web http://www.bis.org E-mail: jun.muranaga@boj.or.jp Muranaga and Shimizu O Hara Muranaga

60 Vol. 44 No. 1 2 準市場 化の制度的枠組み: 英国 教育改革法 1988 の例 Education Reform Act a School Performance Tables LEA 4 LEA LEA 3

Summer 08 59 I はじめに quasi market II III IV V 1 II 教育サービスにおける 準市場 1 教育サービスにおける 準市場 の意義 Education Reform Act 1988 1980 Local Education Authorities LEA Le Grand 1991 Glennerster 1991 3 1 2 3 2 60 Vol. 44

野村資本市場研究所｜ベイルインの導入に向けた検討－破綻時に債権の損失吸収を図る新たな措置－（PDF）

1. SIFI 2. EU 1 FDIC G20 FSB 3. 4. FSB 2012 8 G20 88 2012 6 EU EU bail-in 1 ICB 2 write-down SIFI SIFI SIFI bail-out SIFI G20 too big to fail 2010 6 G20 SIFI 1 3 2011 11 FSBG20 1 2 3 2012 ICB PLAC 2011

第１部　一般的コメント

(( 2000 11 24 2003 12 31 3122 94 2332 508 26 a () () i ii iii iv (i) (ii) (i) (ii) (iii) (iv) (a) (b)(c)(d) a) / (i) (ii) (iii) (iv) 1996 7 1996 12

- March SCB -, -, -, -, -, -, -, -, -, -,,,,,, -, -, -, -,, -,,,, -,,,,,, - -,, -,, Survey of Current Business, July, Table (p. ), Oct, Table (p. ) S.

- March SCB -, -, -, -, -, -, -, -, -, -,,,,,, -, -, -, -,, -,,,, -,,,,,, - -,, -,, Survey of Current Business, July, Table (p. ), Oct, Table (p. ) S.C.B. July, Table SCB, -, - - -, -, - -,,,, - Ibid.,

第１章　国民年金における無年金

1 2 3 4 ILO ILO 5 i ii 6 7 8 9 10 ( ) 3 2 ( ) 3 2 2 2 11 20 60 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 13 14 15 16 17 14 15 8 16 2003 1 17 18 iii 19 iv 20 21 22 23 24 25 ,,, 26 27 28 29 30 (1) (2) (3) 31 1 20

untitled

2007 2 * (i) (ii) 2006 7 1999 2 2000 8 1 (2003) Oda and Ueda (2005) 2005 Kimura and Small(2006) Iwamura, Shiratsuka and Watanabe (2006) (2006) 3 (i) (ii) (iii) 2 2 3 4 2.1 (2003) (2005) 1) (i) (ii) (i)

untitled

表1票4.qx4

iii iv v 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 22 23 10 11 24 25 26 27 10 56 28 11 29 30 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2010 2111 22 23 2412 2513 14 31 17 32 18 33 19 34 20 35 21 36 24 37 25 38 2614

福祉行財政と福祉計画［第３版］

JEL Classification D, D, H

Jeffrey Sachs Chang(1998) Steven Radelet and Jeffrey Sachs (1998) 1999 IMF 1999 World Bank 1998 [ 1998 ] 2000 p [ 20

62 1997 1996 1 1 2 1 Jeffrey Sachs1997 2 Chang(1998)Steven Radelet and Jeffrey Sachs (1998) 1999 IMF 1999 World Bank1998 [ 1998 ] 2000p.9196 [ 2003] 21 [ 2002 2000] [ 1998 1999 ] 1 62 21 3 4 5 6 90 7 3

橡ミュラー列伝Ⅰ.PDF

会社法制上の資本制度の変容と企業会計上の資本概念について

IMES DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES Discussion Paper No. 2006-J-1 INSTITUTE FOR MONETARY AND ECONOMIC STUDIES BANK OF JAPAN 103-8660 30 http://www.imes.boj.or.jp IMES Discussion Paper Series 2006-J-1 2006 1

1 (1) (2)

1 2 (1) (2) (3) 3-78 - 1 (1) (2) - 79 - i) ii) iii) (3) (4) (5) (6) - 80 - (7) (8) (9) (10) 2 (1) (2) (3) (4) i) - 81 - ii) (a) (b) 3 (1) (2) - 82 - - 83 - - 84 - - 85 - - 86 - (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)

- 2 -

- 2 - - 3 - (1) (2) (3) (1) - 4 - ~ - 5 - (2) - 6 - (1) (1) - 7 - - 8 - (i) (ii) (iii) (ii) (iii) (ii) 10 - 9 - (3) - 10 - (3) - 11 - - 12 - (1) - 13 - - 14 - (2) - 15 - - 16 - (3) - 17 - - 18 - (4) -

2 1980 8 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 2 4 4 2 4 6 0 0 6 4 2 4 1 2 2 1 4 4 4 2 3 3 3 4 3 4 4 4 4 2 5 5 2 4 4 4 0 3 3 0 9 10 10 9 1 1

1 1979 6 24 3 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 2 3 4 4 6 0 0 6 2 4 4 4 3 0 0 3 3 3 4 3 2 4 3? 4 3 4 3 4 4 4 4 3 3 4 4 4 4 2 1 1 2 15 4 4 15 0 1 2 1980 8 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 2 4 4 2 4 6 0 0 6 4 2 4 1 2 2 1 4 4 4 2 3 3 3 4 3 4 4

ＰＲ映画-1

II III I ~ 2 ~

中堅中小企業向け秘密保持マニュアル

20 15 14.6 15.3 14.9 15.7 16.0 15.7 13.4 14.5 13.7 14.2 10 10 13 16 19 22 1 70,000 60,000 50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 0 2,500 59,862 56,384 2,000 42,662 44,211 40,639 37,323 1,500 33,408 34,472

I? 3 1 3 1.1?................................. 3 1.2?............................... 3 1.3!................................... 3 2 4 2.1........................................ 4 2.2.......................................

表紙＿目次.PDF

JIL 2 1980 vol.3 15 3 1 3 15 18 IT 26 28 33 20 OECD 80 90 (1998) (2000) 2 Aghion et al. (1999) OECD 1970 1 2 70 1980 90 1.1 Kuznets U inverted U-shaped hypothesis GNP U 1 18901940 6 3 Kuznets(1955) (1963)

IMFの融資制度 : アイスランド、ウクライナ、ハンガリー、ラトビアのケースをもとにして

Global Economy," Address to the Chicago Council on Foreign Relations, February 27. IMF -- IMF, 1997, "Thailand: Letter of Intent," November 25. IMF, 1997, "Indonesia: Letter of Intent," October 31. IMF,

商学　６６‐６☆／７．松浦

1139 2008 9 2008 9 FRB : Federal Reserve Board FRB FRB 1140 1 2008 9 1 1999 2013 Bureau of Economic Analysis, Survey of Current Bunisess, International Data http : //www.bea.gov. 2014 8 10 1141 2000 1

IMES DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES INSTITUTE FOR MONETARY AND ECONOMIC STUDIES BANK OF JAPAN 100-8660 30 IMES Discussion Paper Series 99-J-45 199912 12 1986 General Agreement of Trade in Service Multilateral

An Empirical Study of the Securities Firms' Dilemma on Financial Innovation through Diffusion of Internet Deals Yasugi Satoshi Bower, J. L., 1999, Disruptive technologies: Catching the wave,

公的機関が関与した企業再生支援

14 56 2004.10 corporate control right debt overhang 4, 1998, p.253., p.263., 2000, p.44. 2004.10 57 DES DDS DES DDS 10 11 Hold out, 2000, pp.215-226, p.44. N 1265, 2004.4.1, pp.25-26. Coase theorem Ronald

o 2o 3o 3 1. I o 3. 1o 2o 31. I 3o PDF Adobe Reader 4o 2 1o I 2o 3o 4o 5o 6o 7o 2197/ o 1o 1 1o

78 2 78... 2 22201011... 4... 9... 7... 29 1 1214 2 7 1 8 2 2 3 1 2 1o 2o 3o 3 1. I 1124 4o 3. 1o 2o 31. I 3o PDF Adobe Reader 4o 2 1o 72 1. I 2o 3o 4o 5o 6o 7o 2197/6 9. 9 8o 1o 1 1o 2o / 3o 4o 5o 6o

安全・安心な社会を目指して―現代社会病理の背景に関する有識者ヒアリングとりまとめ－

1 http://www.esri.go.jp/jp/prj/social/social_main.html 2 3 4 5 I 1990 2 II 16 6 20 3,000 2,136 71.2 16 15 16 20 50 3001 55.9 65.8 64.0 55.6 51.4 50 60 3 4 30 50 40 40 30 30 5 79.4 86.1 67.8 44.6 48.8 41.1

金融規制における課徴金制度の抑止効果と法的課題

D&O D&O E-mail: kazutoshi.sugimura@boj.or.jp / /2015.7 143 1. 1 2 3 4 2 5 6 1 2005 13 2 3 6 2 172 2007 31 2 34 21 2 4 2005 40 172 2 1 1 25 3 28 24 301 5 175 1 2 6 2005 13 144 /2015.7 7 8 fairness retribution

国際流動性に関する財政的側面について

IMF SDR IMF 2011 6 1 2 2011 E-mail: obstfeld@econ.berkeley.edu / /2011.10 35 1. 2007 2009 2 Goodhart [1999] 2010 11 2. 4 1970 IMF 1960 36 /2011.10 international reserve 1 D 35 1 D 35 1960 Eichengreen [2011]

untitled

Trade and Trade Finance in the 200809 Financial Crisis, IMF Working Paper WP/11/16., Understanding the Great Trade Collapse of 200809 and the Subsequent Trade Recovery, Economic Perspectives, 2Q/2011.

地方債と地方財政規律

* 1990 GDP 40 JEL Classification: H39, H54, H63, H72, H77 Key words: * 16 (2005a, b) 1 Local Government Bonds and Fiscal Discipline By Takero Doi, Tomoko Hayashi and Nobuyuki Suzuki Abstract Outstanding

取引法の観点からみた資金決済に関する諸問題

1 / /2010.1 105 1. 1 1 1 2008 5 2 2008 10 3 1 4 2007 8 1 2008 32 2 2008 5 12 2009 1 2009 2009 3 6 2008 12 2008 3 1842 32 4 2006 10 2009 4 2009 http://www.shojihomu.or.jp/saikenhou/indexja.html 2005 11

ii iii iv CON T E N T S iii iv v Chapter1 Chapter2 Chapter 1 002 1.1 004 1.2 004 1.2.1 007 1.2.2 009 1.3 009 1.3.1 010 1.3.2 012 1.4 012 1.4.1 014 1.4.2 015 1.5 Chapter3 Chapter4 Chapter5 Chapter6 Chapter7

JICA JETRO

Kyoto Bulletin of Islamic Area Studies, 9 (March 2016), pp. 197 230 JICA JETRO Area Studies TISCO Tata Steel Europe UNDP FS mélange J aime tuffāh uhibbu une pomme camarade A B Ph.D. EU EU EU EU EU EU

1 2 2005 1983 1 ()1984 2 1947 1950 19791996 1

KEO Discussion Paper No.104 19451947 * ** 2006 11 19451947 * ** 1 2 2005 1983 1 ()1984 2 1947 1950 19791996 1 4 A A A A A 3 3 1990 19952003A2003B 4 2 198719941997 1995 1995 3 5 6 1998: 30 40 19701992 7

「産業上利用することができる発明」の審査の運用指針（案）

1 1.... 2 1.1... 2 2.... 4 2.1... 4 3.... 6 4.... 6 1 1 29 1 29 1 1 1. 2 1 1.1 (1) (2) (3) 1 (4) 2 4 1 2 2 3 4 31 12 5 7 2.2 (5) ( a ) ( b ) 1 3 2 ( c ) (6) 2. 2.1 2.1 (1) 4 ( i ) ( ii ) ( iii ) ( iv)

1970). Baumol, W. J., Panzar, J. C. and R. D. Willig (1982); Contestable Markets and The Theory of Industry Structure, 1982. Caves, R. and M. E. Porter (1977); From entry barriers to mobility barriers:

自治体への戦略マネジメントモデルの適用 SWOT分析を中心に

ESRI Discussion Paper Series No.157 by February 2006 Economic and Social Research Institute Cabinet Office Tokyo, Japan 1 E-mail:ohsumi@kanto-gakuin.ac.jp -2 - Application of strategic management model

46 RIM 2007 Vol.7 No HSBC WTO 2006

19782006 200716.7 2006 2007 RIM 2007 Vol.7 No.27 45 46 RIM 2007 Vol.7 No.27 2003 HSBC 1978 2006 2007 WTO 2006 RIM 2007 Vol.7 No.27 47 2003 10 92 95 98 99 4,000 20032006 2003 225 AMC 150 joint -stock companies

FDI2 22 BRICs 22 ODA 22 PF SSA FDI International Finance Corporation 29

1 21 198 1 1 OECD/DAC 22 28 27 29 ODA Remittance 12 1 1 199 25 FDI2 22 BRICs 22 ODA 22 PF 1 1 1 2 23 SSA 23 1 3 1 4 1 5 21 24 25 FDI 1999 22 1 6 25 27 25 International Finance Corporation 29 13 23 23 1

1 3 i i MURC 1/10

2010 10 1 (*) (*) 2010 9 17 108-8248 2-16-4 TEL03-6711-1241 1 3 i 2010 2010 21 15 38 1618 25 14 1517 11 8 15 1618 25 i MURC 1/10 http://www.murc.jp//politics_c1/pol_report/ 60 64 2 1,000 ii 30 29 32 31

i ii iii iv v vi vii ( ー ー ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ー ( ) ( ) ー ー ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) 13 202 24122783 3622316 (1) (2) (3) (4) 2483 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) 11 11 2483 13

資産価格と物価：バブル生成から崩壊にかけての経験を踏まえて

E-mail: shigenori.shiratsuka@boj.or.jp CPIWPIGDP GDP FRBAchieving Price Stability Greenspan CPIWPI WPIWPI Alchian and Klein1973intertemporal cost of living index ICLI ICLI DEPI: dynamic equilibrium price

銀行の不良債権問題と資本市場の経営監視機能 鹿野嘉昭

509 65 1 1980 1990 2000 5 2005 66 510 58 4 1999 2002 1980 1986 3 1998 3 2 3 4 511 67 2 2. 1 1985 10 1980 1980 1989 5 1990 8 6 1990 3 1990 1991 68 512 58 4 2. 2 2002 1986 1990 1991 1994 1980 1990 513 69

非営利組織における純資産と負債の区分

IMES DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES Discussion Paper No. 2009-J-11 INSTITUTE FOR MONETARY AND ECONOMIC STUDIES BANK OF JAPAN 103-8660 2-1-1 http://www.imes.boj.or.jp IMES Discussion Paper Series 2009-J-11 2009

資産価格バブルと金融政策：1980年代後半の日本の経験とその教訓

foreward-looking E-mail: kunio.okina@boj.or.jp E-mail: masaaki.shirakawa@boj.or.jp E-mail: shigenori.shiratsuka@boj.or.jp Cargill, Hutchison, and Ito GDP GDP GDP Morgan Stanley Capital Internationalhttp://www.msci.com

金／金

IMF IMF M&A IMF IMF Gerchenkron Gerchenkron unbalanced growth Gerchenkron Johnson development state Hirschman IMF OECD IMF IMF GDP crony capitalism Krugman IMF capital market-based financial system bank-centered

調査レポート

211 3 15 198 199 遜 21 7.335 OFW)OFW OFW OFW OFW 21 18 GDP 1 OFW 遜 遜 OFW 18-8248 2-16-4 TEL3-6711-125 15 1 5-5 -1-15 CEIC 逼 1/2 1% 8% 6% 4% 2% % -2% CEIC 2/2 55 5 45 4 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 8% 7% 6% 5% 4% 3%

物価指数の計測誤差と品質調整手法：わが国CPIからの教訓

CPICPI CPI CPI CPI CPI Economic Perspective Shiratsukaa Consumer Price IndexCPI CPI CPI CPI CPI Advisory Commission to Study the Consumer Price Index 1996Shiratsuka 1999bHoffmann 1998Cunningham 1996 Crawford

(2003 ) % worst 7.4%worst , Global Development Repo

8500162 1 2-1. 2-2. 2-3. 2 1 3-1. 3-2. (2003 ) 2002 5.2% 7.8 2 2001 1160 worst 7.4%worst 1 1999 2 2000 11 2001 2 2 2002 2 2001 2 2 2 50 4 5,000 5.3 2001 2 1990 3 2 1 Global Development Report 2003 2 2001p.46

[ ]{木山(判例)}(責)魏.indd

59 3 2017 29 2 8 I 1 36 1 2 2 26 44 2 3 4 36 17 44 2 1 2 1 8 2 8 4 3 2 8 3 26 10 4 26 2014 103 91 5 6 28 1 183 1 7 5 44 2 2 2 26 36 17 6 1315 2006 192 1317 2006 268 6 1 2016 71 2 2017 29 7 15 8 27 253

ミクロ・データによる家計行動分析： 将来不安と予備的貯蓄

subjective measures E-mailkeiko.murata@mfs.cao.go.jp subjective subjective measures Dardanoni Leland waiting option Browning and LusardiEngen and Gruber Carroll and Samwick PSIDPanel Study of Income Dynamics

野村資本市場研究所｜アジアの金融競争力（PDF）

2013 Spring 1. GDP 3 26% 2. 3. 4. GDP 1 GDP 2000 25.4% 2012 10 IMF 1 GDP 28.7%GDP 10.7% 20.3% 2000 2012 10 2 3 2000 2012 4.2 5.4 2 2000 14% 2012 26% GDP 2012 30 10 32003 11 2013 Spring 100% 2 90% 80% 70%

untitled

IV 1 IV 2 (i) 2 0.13 0.23 1 (i) 3 ( 0.11 0.19 0.5% 2 (ii) 1% (ii) 1,000, 1,000 (1 Q) G A 0.02 {e i ) 1} Q (e 5 1) 0.02 β Ρ (iii) 1 1 QG {e ig ( i G ) 1} QG (e 5 1) Ρ e in e i G n Q e in 1 e i G n 1 1 1

178 5 I 1 ( ) ( ) 10 3 13 3 1 8891 8 3023 6317 ( 10 1914 7152 ) 16 5 1 ( ) 6 13 3 13 3 8575 3896 8 1715 779 6 (1) 2 7 4 ( 2 ) 13 11 26 12 21 14 11 21

I 178 II 180 III ( ) 181 IV 183 V 185 VI 186 178 5 I 1 ( ) ( ) 10 3 13 3 1 8891 8 3023 6317 ( 10 1914 7152 ) 16 5 1 ( ) 6 13 3 13 3 8575 3896 8 1715 779 6 (1) 2 7 4 ( 2 ) 13 11 26 12 21 14 11 21 4 10 (

OSIPP40_p1_2.eps

2006 年 秋号 No.40 1 2 Asia-Pacific Financial Markets Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies Studies on a Second Generation of Disequilibrium Economics International Economic Integration and

第９章　香港

1842 1997 1997 7 1 4 97 7 GDP 97 5.0% 98 5.1% 1999 98 1 GDP 99 2 5 1997 2 1999 2000 22 9 37 113 52 114 30 211 1,100 3 95% 2000 687 1996 60.3 32.6 95.2 38.1 1974 1993 25 8,000 24 9,180 214 331 757 757 1573

, 3, 1999, 4,,

1, 1992 2005,,, 10 2,, 1992 1998 1,,, 1998 2002 2,, 3,,, 2002, 2002 3 1 2 1 , 3, 1999, 4,, 3 14 11 2 I, 10,, 1992 2005, 2,, 3, 4,, II,, 1992 1998 1,, 1998 2002 2 2002 3 II-1: 1 1993 1998 90,, 1995 6850,,

公務員倫理問題への新アプローチ

OECD CPI CPI CPI CPI CPI CPI / GDP / / / /.............................. Transparency International Corruption Perception Index CPI CPI 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

伝統的な経済学では、「消費は重要ではあるが、気にしなくてもよい」と考えられてきた

2005 1 2004 SARS 2003 IMF 2004 5.0 2004 4.1 0.9 30 2005 2004 2005 2005 2005 2004 2005 IMF 2005 4.3 2004 IMF 2004 2003 3.0 4.3 2003 2 2003 2004 IT 2005 IMF 2005 2004 3.5 IT 1995 10 2.8% 10 2 1 IT IT 2004

Title Author(s) Kobe University Repository : Kernel 流 動 性 危 機 : レパレッジとモニタリング (< 特 集 > 世 界 金 融 危 機 )(Liquidity Crisis : Leverage and Monitoring ( World Financial Crisis)) 丸 茂, 俊 彦 Citation 国 民 経 済 雑 誌,203(1):107-119

untitled

商学　６５‐５☆／１４．植田

708 709 2000 2000 1 3 hedge speculative ponzi G Π DS G Πt DSt t 1,2,...,n 1 G Πt DSt 1 t j 2 G Πt DSt j 1 t n 3 710 G Πt DSt 1 t n 1 4 G Πt DSt t n 5 2 Minsky Foley 2003 Charles 2008 a Lima and Meirelles

デフレ不況下の金融政策をめぐる政治過程

1991 2003 GDP....................................... http://www.stat.go.jp/ http://www.boj.or.jp/ GDP http://www.esri.cao.go.jp/ GDP - - - inflation targeting Krugman a IS-LM liquidity trap Krugman b Krugman