スライド 1
|
|
|
- しまな こいまる
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1
2 AGN SNR Pulsar e P e + χ e - χ JEM-EF ISS CALET CALorimetric Electron Telescope
3 JAPAN Aoyama Gakuin University Hirosaki University Institute for Cosmic Ray Research, University of Tokyo Ibaraki University JAXA/Space Environment Utilization Center JAXA/ Institute of Aerospace and Astronautical Sciences Kanagawa University Kanagawa University of Human Services High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK) STE, Nagoya University National Inst. of Radiological Sciences Nihon University Ritsumeikan University Saitama University Shibaura Institute of Technology Shinshu University Tokiwa University Tokyo Technology Inst. Waseda University Yokohama National University ITALY University of Siena University of Florence & IFAC (CNR) University of Pisa University of Roma Tor Vergata University of Padova Support Agencies JAXA/SEUC Waseda University with JSPS, MEXT ASI USA NASA/GSFC CRESST/NASA/GSFC and University of Maryland CRESST/NASA/GSFC and Unicersity Space Research Association Louisiana State University NASA Washington University in St Louis University of Denver 43 3
4 CGBM/SGM p CGBM/HXM GPSR (GPS Receiver) MDC(Mission Data Controller) CAL / IMC p 650 kg 650 W FRGF (Flight Releasable Grapple Fixture) ASC (Advanced Stellar Compass) CAL / CHD CAL / TASC m 300 kbps Nominal 20 kbps
5 CALET CALET HTV HTV ISS HTV CALET
6 SNR erg 99% SN1987AKAMIOKANDE 1% erg 10% erg 1% erg dn/de E -2 exp(-e/e c ) Log(dN/dE) Ec Log(E)
7 WIMP χχ e +,e
8 WIMP (1) WIMP line Emission (2) WIMP continuum Emission () Monoenergetic: Direct Production of e+e- pair UniformProduction via Intermediate Particles Double Peak Production by Dipole Distribution via Intermediate Particles
9 IC p+/- or K+/- fi m+/- fi e+/
10 Diffusion Model dn ( ) ( be N ) e 2 - D Ne - e = Q dt E E N e (t, r, E) t, r Q b d D D = D 0 D ( E / 5 GeV) d = 2 ~ 5 0 = ~ E 2 [cm s E < -1 ] 5 GeV 5 GeV
11 E -3 PPB-BETS
12 2 de s = -be = bt + = Thomson c B b + w 2 4 ph dt E( t) E0 3m c Ł 8p e ł E 0 E(t) = E 0 / 2 1 t 1 2 = be
13 10 1 3TeV F
14 TeV SNR - T < R < 1 kpc Vela 10, pc 815 Cygnus Loop 20, pc 2, Monogem 86, pc 1,
15 Ec= ΔT=0 yrdo=2x10 29 cm 2 /s Do=5 x cm 2 /s Ec= 20 TeV Ec=20 TeVΔT= yr
16 Adriani et al. (2008) Chang et al. (2008)
17 ATIC + KKDM620GeV boost factor 200 KKDM hidden U(1) H 1.2TeV s arxiv: / PTP 122(2),553,2009 BESS,PAMELA PAMELA ATIC/PPB-BETS 100GeV
18 CALET KK ( 620 GeV) SUSY ( 820GeV) 2 yearsbf=5) or 5 yearsbf=2) 2years BF=40) or 5 yearsbf=16)
19 (10 5 ) (~2 %) 1 TeV ATIC anomaly 1 GeV?? Vela
20 KK DM vs. SNR type (Δt=10 5 year) SNR Type vs. Pulsar (Δt=310 5 year) CALET Observation CALET Observation KK DM SNR Type Pulsar Type SNR Type Source tot 0 t 0 Ł t 0 SNR Type exp(-t)pulsar Type -2 E ln 4 t ln 4 E Q ( t) exp - Q0 ( t) Lspindown = ł t 0 tot ( 1+ t / t ) 2 0 t 0 t
21 CALET2 CALET N.Tateyama (Ph.D Thesis) > 1 TeV Fermi/LAT CALET5 CALET > 1 TeV
22 Detection of High Energy Gamma-rays Performance for Gamma-ray Detection Simulation of Galactic Diffuse Radiation Energy Range 4 GeV-10 TeV Effective Area 600 cm 2 (10GeV) Field-of-View 2 sr Geometrical Factor 1100 cm 2 sr Energy Resolution 3% (10 GeV) Angular Resolution GeV) Pointing Accuracy 6 Point Source Sensitivity 8 x 10-9 cm -2 s -1 ~25,000 photons are expected per one year Observation Period (planned) (5 years) *) ~7,000 photons from extragalactic γ-background (EGB) per one year Simulation of point sources per one year Energy Spectrum Position Position Vela: ~ 300 photons above 5 GeV Geminga: ~150 photons above 5 GeV Crab: ~ 100 photons above 5 GeV
23 E c = 100 Z
24 CALET p He
25 CALET CALET 5 C O Ne Mg Si Fe
26 /(B/C) D ~ E δ TeV /n K B : Diffusion rate near SNR shocks K B =40 ATIC Ti/Fe 1σ 2σ CREAM Leaky Box Model SNR p-p e -,e + Fermi-LAT,HESS CALET 5 Pamelae + /(e + +e - ) SNR B/C K B =20 arxiv: / Phys. Rev. D 80, (2009)
27 p CHD mm 142 X,YPMT p IMC 1 mm X,Y64chPMT 3 r.l. 0.2 r.l r.l.2 p TASC PWO mm r.l.apd/pd CHD IMC 3 r.l. TASC 27 r.l
28 Gamma-ray 10 GeV Electron 1 TeV Proton 10 TeV IMCTASC CHD e
29 SΩ / CHD
30 1 TeV E -2.7 (1~1000TeV) 1.6x10 6 TeV TeV 95% 4 ~2x10 5 (90% C.L.)
31 Anti ANTI TASC TASC DAQ DAQ SIA SIA Battery HV HV IMC IMC
32
33 CALET ATIC, PAMELA, Fermi-LAT, AMS, HESS, ISS-CREAM, DAMPE, GAMMA-400, CREST
34 ATIC-4 ( ) 19 d 10 h 43 m
35 AMS (green stars), HEAT (open black triangles), BETS (open blue circles), PPB-BETS (bluecrosses), emulsion chambers (black open diamonds)
36 Particle Antiproton flux Positron flux Electron flux Proton flux Electron/positron flux Light nuclei (up to Z=6) Light isotopes (D, 3 He) Antinuclei search Energy Range 80 MeV GeV 50 MeV GeV up to 400 GeV up to 700 GeV up to 2 TeV up to 200 GeV/n up to 1 GeV/n (better than 10-7 in antihe/he)
37 Si + W
38 32.3 GV positron
39 PAMELA
40
41
42 Tracker 9 e 1.03 TeV
43 positron fraction
44 ( Rio de Janeiro )
45 Detector Energy Range (GeV) Energy Resolution e/p Selection Power Key Instrument (Thickness of CAL) SΩT m sr day) PPB-BETS % 4000 IMC ~0.42 GeV (> 10 GeV) (Lead: 9 X 0 ) ATIC ~2% 6,000 Thick Seg. CAL 3.08 (+ ATIC4) a few 1000 ( >100 GeV) (BGO: 18 X 0 ) + C Targets PAMELA GeV 10 5 Magnet + IMC (W:16.3 X 0 ) ~1.6 (2 years) FERMI- LAT 20-1, % ( GeV) ( GeV) Energy dep. GF Tracker + ACD + Thin Seg. CAL (W:1.5X 0 +CsI:8.6X 0 ) 770@100GeV 110@TeV (1 year) AMS 1.5-1,000 (Due to Magnet) ~ GeV 10 4 Magnet+TRD+RICH+IMC (x by TRD ) (Lead: 16.7X 0 ) ~100 (?) (1year) CALET 1-20,000 ~2% (>100 GeV) 10 5 IMC + Thick Seg. CAL (W: 3 X 0 + PWO : 27 X 0 ) 220 (5 years)
46 CALET 20 TeV, 10GeV~ 10TeV, 10 GeV ~ 1000 TeV 6 Pre-phase A CALET JEM-EF TeV
E 1 GeV E 10 GeV 1 2, X X , GeV 10 GeV 1 GeV GeV π
169 8555 3 4 1 e-mail: kataoka.jun@waseda.jp 606 8502 e-mail: totani@kuastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp 305 0801 1 1 e-mail: kunihito.ioka@kek.jp 50 5 X 1 10 10 2008 3 2,000 542 2012 9 5 2. 1 3 E 1 GeV E 10 GeV 1 2,
スーパーカミオカンデにおける 高エネルギーニュートリノ研究
2009 11 20 Cosmic Ray PD D M P4 ? CR M f M PD MOA M1 ν ν p+p+p+p 4 He +2e - +2ν e MeV e - + p n+ ν e γ e + + e - ν x + ν x p + p, γ + p π + X π µ + ν µ e + ν µ + ν e TeV p + p π + X π µ + ν µ e + ν µ +
Fermi ( )
Fermi ( ) Outline Introduction Blazar Spectral Energy Distribution (SED) Predictions for the Fermi mission (Prospects for CTA) Summary The Blazar Sequence and the Cosmic Gamma-ray Background Radiation
S4-002_CALET
CALorimetric Electron Telescope CALET の軌道上性能と初期成果 CALET 研究代表者 : 鳥居祥二 早稲田大学理工研 / 物理学科 JAXA 有人宇宙技術センター CALET 2017 年 1 月 6 日第 17 回宇宙科学シンポジウム 1 S4 002 第 17 回宇宙科学シンポジウム @ 宇宙科学研究所 2017.1.6 CALET collaboration
7-1yamazaki.pptx
Suzaku/ASTRO-H Suzaku/ASTRO-H 1. Vela ( Watchman ) (1967 1979): GRB (1969) 2. GINGA (1987 1991): X-ray counterpart GRB (galactic) X-ray burst? 3. BATSE (1991 2000): Galactic origin models!!! 4. BeppoSAX
Microsoft PowerPoint - GlastIcrr_2005Feb.ppt
γ 線衛星 GLAST の概要と開発試験 February 24, 2005@ICRR Tsunefumi Mizuno 広島大学理学部 mizuno@hirax6.hepl.hiroshima-u.ac.jp History of Changes: February 23, 2005 written by T. Mizuno Tsunefumi Mizuno 1 GLAST Large Area
306 [7] GeV TeV PAMELA 100 GeV PAMELA AMS GeV [8] TeV [9] PAMELA[10] AMS BESS-Polar 95 [11]AMS 1.3 AMS AMS rigidity TOFTime Of Flight TRDE
![306 [7] GeV TeV PAMELA 100 GeV PAMELA AMS GeV [8] TeV [9] PAMELA[10] AMS BESS-Polar 95 [11]AMS 1.3 AMS AMS rigidity TOFTime Of Flight TRDE](/thumbs/92/109447037.jpg "306 [7] GeV TeV PAMELA 100 GeV PAMELA AMS GeV [8] TeV [9] PAMELA[10] AMS BESS-Polar 95 [11]AMS 1.3 AMS AMS rigidity TOFTime Of Flight TRDE")
305 Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer (AMS) Sadakazu.Haino@cern.ch 2013 2 28 1 AMS 1.1 AMS AMS 60 600 1976 LEP L3 LEP GeV TeV 2011 5 AMS ISS ISS 2020 20 BESS [2] HEAT[3] AMS PAMELA [4] Fermi [5] 10 GeV 100 GeV
B
B09170 5 8 ) ( ) π 0-1 s -1 sr -1 MeV HI Emissivity (3rd quadrant) -3-4 Abdo et al. 009 (6 months, P6V3_DIFFUSE) Local arm interarm Perseus arm and beyond Emissivity (MeV E -5-6 3 4 Energy (MeV) 5 1: 1
2 X-ray 6 gamma-ray 7 1 17.1 0:38m 0:77m nm 17.2 Hz Hz 1 E p E E = h = ch= (17.2) p = E=c = h=c = h= (17.3) continuum continuous spectrum line spectru
1 17 object 1 observation 17.1 X electromagnetic wave photon 1 = c (17.1) c =3 10 8 ms ;1 m mm = 10 ;3 m m =10 ;6 m nm = 10 ;9 m 1 Hz 17.1 spectrum radio 2 infrared 3 visual light optical light 4 ultraviolet
BESS Introduction Detector BESS (BESS-TeVspectrometer) Experimetns Data analysis (1) (2) Results Summary
Measurements of Galactic and Atmospheric Cosmic-Ray Absolute Fluxes BESS Introduction Detector BESS (BESS-TeVspectrometer) Experimetns Data analysis (1) (2) Results Summary Introduction 90% 9% 100~10 6
スライド 1
Matsuura Laboratory SiC SiC 13 2004 10 21 22 H-SiC ( C-SiC HOY Matsuura Laboratory n E C E D ( E F E T Matsuura Laboratory Matsuura Laboratory DLTS Osaka Electro-Communication University Unoped n 3C-SiC
W 1983 W ± Z cm 10 cm 50 MeV TAC - ADC ADC [ (µs)] = [] (2.08 ± 0.36) 10 6 s 3 χ µ + µ 8 = (1.20 ± 0.1) 10 5 (Ge
![W 1983 W ± Z cm 10 cm 50 MeV TAC - ADC ADC [ (µs)] = [] (2.08 ± 0.36) 10 6 s 3 χ µ + µ 8 = (1.20 ± 0.1) 10 5 (Ge](/thumbs/91/105929864.jpg "W 1983 W ± Z cm 10 cm 50 MeV TAC - ADC ADC [ (µs)] = [] (2.08 ± 0.36) 10 6 s 3 χ µ + µ 8 = (1.20 ± 0.1) 10 5 (Ge")
22 2 24 W 1983 W ± Z 0 3 10 cm 10 cm 50 MeV TAC - ADC 65000 18 ADC [ (µs)] = 0.0207[] 0.0151 (2.08 ± 0.36) 10 6 s 3 χ 2 2 1 20 µ + µ 8 = (1.20 ± 0.1) 10 5 (GeV) 2 G µ ( hc) 3 1 1 7 1.1.............................
Λ (Λ ) Λ (Ge) Hyperball γ ΛN J-PARC Λ dead time J-PARC flash ADC 1 dead time ( ) 1 µsec 3
19 Λ (Λ ) Λ (Ge) Hyperball γ ΛN J-PARC Λ dead time J-PARC flash ADC 1 dead time ( ) 1 µsec 3 1 1 1.1 γ ΛN................. 1 1.2 KEK J-PARC................................ 2 1.2.1 J-PARC....................................
Μ粒子電子転換事象探索実験による世界最高感度での 荷電LFV探索 第3回機構シンポジューム 2009年5月11日 素粒子原子核研究所 三原 智
µ COMET LFV esys clfv (Charged Lepton Flavor Violation) J-PARC µ COMET ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) B ( ) B ( ) B ( ) B ( ) B ( ) B ( ) B 2016 J- PARC µ KEK 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 clfv clfv clfv clfv clfv clfv clfv
放射線化学, 92, 39 (2011)
V. M. S. V. 1 Contents of the lecture note by Prof. V. M. Byakov and Dr. S. V. Stepanov (Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Russia) are described in a series of articles. The first article
SFN
THE STAR FORMATION NEWSLETTER No.291-14 March 2017 2017/04/28 16-20 16. X-Shooter spectroscopy of young stellar objects in Lupus. Atmospheric parameters, membership and activity diagnostics 17. The evolution
PowerPoint Presentation
KEK I. II. a. BESS b. c. d. III. BESS-Polar IV. Introduction D p GeV (
CMB and DM (Cosmic Microwave Background and Dark Matter) ~ ~
2003 2003 62 CMB and DM (Cosmic Microwave Background and Dark Matter) ~ ~ -PIC PIC CMB DM http://www-cr.scphys.kyotou.ac.jp cr.scphys.kyotou.ac.jp/ member/miuchi/education/lecture/2003_1st/ up up 5 223
Table 1: Basic parameter set. Aperture values indicate the radius. δ is relative momentum deviation. Parameter Value Unit Initial emittance 10 mm.mrad
SuperKEKB EMITTANCE GROWTH BY MISALIGNMENTS AND JITTERS IN SUPERKEKB INJECTOR LINAC Y. Seimiya, M. Satoh, T. Suwada, T. Higo, Y. Enomoto, F. Miyahara, K. Furukawa High Energy Accelerator Research Organization
25 3 4
25 3 4 1 µ e + ν e +ν µ µ + e + +ν e + ν µ e e + TAC START STOP START veto START (2.04 ± 0.18)µs 1/2 STOP (2.09 ± 0.11)µs 1/8 G F /( c) 3 (1.21±0.09) 5 /GeV 2 (1.19±0.05) 5 /GeV 2 Weinberg θ W sin θ W
Canvas-tr01(title).cv3
Working Group DaiMaJin DaiRittaikaku Multiparticle Jiki-Bunnsekiki Samurai7 Superconducting Analyser for Multi particles from RadioIsotope Beams with 7Tm of bending power (γ,n) softgdr, GDR non resonant
[pb/gev] T d / dp Data/Theory 6 5.5 0.5 0 0 00 00 00 500 600 p [GeV] T anti-k jets, R=0.6, y jet L dt=7 nb ( s=7 TeV) Systematic Uncertainties.8 NLO-pQCD (CTEQ 6.6)+ Non pert. corr. 0 00 00 00 500 600
untitled
masato@icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp 996 Start 997 998 999 000 00 00 003 004 005 006 007 008 SK-I Accident Partial Reconstruction SK-II Full reconstruction ( SK-III ( ),46 (40%) 5,8 (9%),9 (40%) 5MeV 7MeV 4MeV(plan)
(e ) (µ ) (τ ) ( (ν e,e ) e- (ν µ,µ ) µ- (ν τ,τ ) τ- ) ( ) ( ) ( ) (SU(2) ) (W +,Z 0,W ) * 1) [ ] [ ] [ ] ν e ν µ ν τ e µ τ, e R,µ R,τ R (2.1a
![(e ) (µ ) (τ ) ( (ν e,e ) e- (ν µ,µ ) µ- (ν τ,τ ) τ- ) ( ) ( ) ( ) (SU(2) ) (W +,Z 0,W ) * 1) [ ] [ ] [ ] ν e ν µ ν τ e µ τ, e R,µ R,τ R (2.1a](/thumbs/100/144882653.jpg "(e ) (µ ) (τ ) ( (ν e,e ) e- (ν µ,µ ) µ- (ν τ,τ ) τ- ) ( ) ( ) ( ) (SU(2) ) (W +,Z 0,W ) * 1) [ ] [ ] [ ] ν e ν µ ν τ e µ τ, e R,µ R,τ R (2.1a")
1 2 2.1 (e ) (µ ) (τ ) ( (ν e,e ) e- (ν µ,µ ) µ- (ν τ,τ ) τ- ) ( ) ( ) ( ) (SU(2) ) (W +,Z 0,W ) * 1) [ ] [ ] [ ] ν e ν µ ν τ e µ τ, e R,µ R,τ R (2.1a) L ( ) ) * 2) W Z 1/2 ( - ) d u + e + ν e 1 1 0 0
positron 1930 Dirac 1933 Anderson m 22Na(hl=2.6years), 58Co(hl=71days), 64Cu(hl=12hour) 68Ge(hl=288days) MeV : thermalization m psec 100
positron 1930 Dirac 1933 Anderson m 22Na(hl=2.6years), 58Co(hl=71days), 64Cu(hl=12hour) 68Ge(hl=288days) 0.5 1.5MeV : thermalization 10 100 m psec 100psec nsec E total = 2mc 2 + E e + + E e Ee+ Ee-c mc
42 3 u = (37) MeV/c 2 (3.4) [1] u amu m p m n [1] m H [2] m p = (4) MeV/c 2 = (13) u m n = (4) MeV/c 2 =
![42 3 u = (37) MeV/c 2 (3.4) [1] u amu m p m n [1] m H [2] m p = (4) MeV/c 2 = (13) u m n = (4) MeV/c 2 =](/thumbs/73/68712188.jpg "42 3 u = (37) MeV/c 2 (3.4) [1] u amu m p m n [1] m H [2] m p = (4) MeV/c 2 = (13) u m n = (4) MeV/c 2 =")
3 3.1 3.1.1 kg m s J = kg m 2 s 2 MeV MeV [1] 1MeV=1 6 ev = 1.62 176 462 (63) 1 13 J (3.1) [1] 1MeV/c 2 =1.782 661 731 (7) 1 3 kg (3.2) c =1 MeV (atomic mass unit) 12 C u = 1 12 M(12 C) (3.3) 41 42 3 u
KamLAND (µ) ν e RSFP + ν e RSFP(Resonant Spin Flavor Precession) ν e RSFP 1. ν e ν µ ν e RSFP.ν e νµ ν e νe µ KamLAND νe KamLAND (ʼ4). kton-day 8.3 < E ν < 14.8 MeV candidates Φ(νe) < 37 cm - s -1 P(νe
1.7 D D 2 100m 10 9 ev f(x) xf(x) = c(s)x (s 1) (x + 1) (s 4.5) (1) s age parameter x f(x) ev 10 9 ev 2
2005 1 3 5.0 10 15 7.5 10 15 ev 300 12 40 Mrk421 Mrk421 1 3.7 4 20 [1] Grassberger-Procaccia [2] Wolf [3] 11 11 11 11 300 289 11 11 1 1.7 D D 2 100m 10 9 ev f(x) xf(x) = c(s)x (s 1) (x + 1) (s 4.5) (1)
B
B07557 0 0 (AGN) AGN AGN X X AGN AGN Geant4 AGN X X X (AGN) AGN AGN X AGN. AGN AGN Seyfert Seyfert Seyfert AGN 94 Carl Seyfert Seyfert Seyfert z < 0. Seyfert I II I 000 km/s 00 km/s II AGN (BLR) (NLR)
PowerPoint Presentation
2010 KEK (Japan) (Japan) (Japan) Cheoun, Myun -ki Soongsil (Korea) Ryu,, Chung-Yoe Soongsil (Korea) 1. S.Reddy, M.Prakash and J.M. Lattimer, P.R.D58 #013009 (1998) Magnetar : ~ 10 15 G ~ 10 17 19 G (?)
プラズマ・核融合学会
1. Philosophy of Radiological Protection and Radiation Hazard Protection Law 1) Oita University of Nursing and Health Sciences, Oita, OITA 870-1201, Japan 2) National Institute for Fusion Science, Toki,
Bethe-Bloch Bethe-Bloch (stopping range) Bethe-Bloch FNAL (Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory) - (SciBooNE ) SciBooNE Bethe-Bloch FNAL - (SciBooNE
21 2 27 Bethe-Bloch Bethe-Bloch (stopping range) Bethe-Bloch FNAL (Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory) - (SciBooNE ) SciBooNE Bethe-Bloch FNAL - (SciBooNE ) Bethe-Bloch 1 0.1..............................
輻射の量子論、選択則、禁制線、許容線
Radiative Processes in Astrophysics 005/8/1 http://wwwxray.ess.sci.osaka- u.ac.jp/~hayasida Semi-Classical Theory of Radiative Transitions r r 1/ 4 H = ( cp ea) m c + + eφ nonrelativistic limit, Coulomb
Drift Chamber
Quench Gas Drift Chamber 23 25 1 2 5 2.1 Drift Chamber.............................................. 5 2.2.............................................. 6 2.2.1..............................................
Microsoft PowerPoint - Ppt ppt[読み取り専用]
![Microsoft PowerPoint - Ppt ppt[読み取り専用]](/thumbs/91/105115556.jpg "Microsoft PowerPoint - Ppt ppt[読み取り専用]")
Astroparticle physics 富山大学 松本重貴 1. 暗黒物質問題 2. 暗黒物質の正体? 3. 暗黒物質の探査 Astroparticle physics って何? 素粒子 物理学 ニュートリノ暗黒物質暗黒エネルギー宇宙のバリオン数インフレーション 宇宙 物理学 宇宙の暗黒物質問題暗黒物質の存在は確立したが その正体 ( 質量 スピン 量子数や相互作用 ) については不明であるという問題!
23 1 Section ( ) ( ) ( 46 ) , 238( 235,238 U) 232( 232 Th) 40( 40 K, % ) (Rn) (Ra). 7( 7 Be) 14( 14 C) 22( 22 Na) (1 ) (2 ) 1 µ 2 4
23 1 Section 1.1 1 ( ) ( ) ( 46 ) 2 3 235, 238( 235,238 U) 232( 232 Th) 40( 40 K, 0.0118% ) (Rn) (Ra). 7( 7 Be) 14( 14 C) 22( 22 Na) (1 ) (2 ) 1 µ 2 4 2 ( )2 4( 4 He) 12 3 16 12 56( 56 Fe) 4 56( 56 Ni)
X線分析の進歩36 別刷
X X X-Ray Fluorescence Analysis on Environmental Standard Reference Materials with a Dry Battery X-Ray Generator Hideshi ISHII, Hiroya MIYAUCHI, Tadashi HIOKI and Jun KAWAI Copyright The Discussion Group
( ) Note (e ) (µ ) (τ ) ( (ν e,e ) e- (ν µ, µ ) µ- (ν τ,τ ) τ- ) ( ) ( ) (SU(2) ) (W +,Z 0,W ) * 1) 3 * 2) [ ] [ ] [ ] ν e ν µ ν τ e
![( ) Note (e ) (µ ) (τ ) ( (ν e,e ) e- (ν µ, µ ) µ- (ν τ,τ ) τ- ) ( ) ( ) (SU(2) ) (W +,Z 0,W ) * 1) 3 * 2) [ ] [ ] [ ] ν e ν µ ν τ e](/thumbs/98/136160482.jpg "( ) Note (e ) (µ ) (τ ) ( (ν e,e ) e- (ν µ, µ ) µ- (ν τ,τ ) τ- ) ( ) ( ) (SU(2) ) (W +,Z 0,W ) * 1) 3 * 2) [ ] [ ] [ ] ν e ν µ ν τ e")
( ) Note 3 19 12 13 8 8.1 (e ) (µ ) (τ ) ( (ν e,e ) e- (ν µ, µ ) µ- (ν τ,τ ) τ- ) ( ) ( ) (SU(2) ) (W +,Z 0,W ) * 1) 3 * 2) [ ] [ ] [ ] ν e ν µ ν τ e µ τ, e R, µ R, τ R (1a) L ( ) ) * 3) W Z 1/2 ( - )
J-PARC October 14-15, 2005 KEK
J-PARC October 14-15, 2005 KEK 目次 ミューオン 電子転換過程の紹介 MECO実験 PRISM/PRIME実験 @J-PARC まとめ GIM-like mixing! µ! e W e 3 SUSY-GUT Large top Yukawa couplings result in sizable off-diagonal components in a slepton
Solar Flare neutrino for Super Novae Conference
KamLAND 2019/01/07-08 KamLAND KamLAND 1. 10 2 ~10 3 sec 10 32 ~10 33 erg (http://www.isas.jaxa.jp/home/solar/yohkoh/) X,γ ( ) νe,νe,νµ,νµ. 2. p π ν/x /γ N π 0, π ± 2.22 MeV from 1 H(n,γ) 2 H p,n Solar
6 2 T γ T B (6.4) (6.1) [( d nm + 3 ] 2 nt B )a 3 + nt B da 3 = 0 (6.9) na 3 = T B V 3/2 = T B V γ 1 = const. or T B a 2 = const. (6.10) H 2 = 8π kc2
![6 2 T γ T B (6.4) (6.1) [( d nm + 3 ] 2 nt B )a 3 + nt B da 3 = 0 (6.9) na 3 = T B V 3/2 = T B V γ 1 = const. or T B a 2 = const. (6.10) H 2 = 8π kc2](/thumbs/92/109118076.jpg "6 2 T γ T B (6.4) (6.1) [( d nm + 3 ] 2 nt B )a 3 + nt B da 3 = 0 (6.9) na 3 = T B V 3/2 = T B V γ 1 = const. or T B a 2 = const. (6.10) H 2 = 8π kc2")
1 6 6.1 (??) (P = ρ rad /3) ρ rad T 4 d(ρv ) + PdV = 0 (6.1) dρ rad ρ rad + 4 da a = 0 (6.2) dt T + da a = 0 T 1 a (6.3) ( ) n ρ m = n (m + 12 ) m v2 = n (m + 32 ) T, P = nt (6.4) (6.1) d [(nm + 32 ] )a
2005 4 18 3 31 1 1 8 1.1.................................. 8 1.2............................... 8 1.3.......................... 8 1.4.............................. 9 1.5.............................. 9
Appendix 1. CRC 13 Appendix Appendix LCGT 18 DECIGO 18 XMASS 19 GADZOOKS! 20 NEWAGE(
CRC 22 1 3 2 4 2-1 2-2 2-3 2-4 3 9 3-1 3-2 3-3 3-4 3-5 4 12 Appendix 1. CRC 13 Appendix 2. 14 Appendix 3. 17 LCGT 18 DECIGO 18 XMASS 19 GADZOOKS! 20 NEWAGE( ) 21 22 24 CTA (Cherenkov Telescope Array) 25
Fig. 1. Horizontal displacement of the second and third order triangulation points accompanied with the Tottori Earthquake of (after SATO, 1973)
Journal of the Geodetic Society of Japan Vol. 27, No. 3, (1981), pp. 183-191 Research on Fault Movement by means of Aero-Triangulation ( T) (An experiment on the earthquake fault of the Izu-Oshima Kinkai
J-PARC E15 K K-pp Missing mass Invariant mass K - 3 He Formation K - pp cluster neutron Mode to decay charged particles p Λ π - Decay p Decay E15 dete
J-PARC E15 (TGEM-TPC) TGEM M1 ( ) J-PARC E15 TPC TGEM TGEM J-PARC E15 K K-pp Missing mass Invariant mass K - 3 He Formation K - pp cluster neutron Mode to decay charged particles p Λ π - Decay p Decay
総研大恒星進化概要.dvi
The Structure and Evolution of Stars I. Basic Equations. M r r =4πr2 ρ () P r = GM rρ. r 2 (2) r: M r : P and ρ: G: M r Lagrange r = M r 4πr 2 rho ( ) P = GM r M r 4πr. 4 (2 ) s(ρ, P ) s(ρ, P ) r L r T
1 9 v.0.1 c (2016/10/07) Minoru Suzuki T µ 1 (7.108) f(e ) = 1 e β(e µ) 1 E 1 f(e ) (Bose-Einstein distribution function) *1 (8.1) (9.1)
1 9 v..1 c (216/1/7) Minoru Suzuki 1 1 9.1 9.1.1 T µ 1 (7.18) f(e ) = 1 e β(e µ) 1 E 1 f(e ) (Bose-Einstein distribution function) *1 (8.1) (9.1) E E µ = E f(e ) E µ (9.1) µ (9.2) µ 1 e β(e µ) 1 f(e )
The Plasma Boundary of Magnetic Fusion Devices
ASAKURA Nobuyuki, Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute, Naka, Ibaraki 311-0193, Japan e-mail: asakuran@fusion.naka.jaeri.go.jp The Plasma Boundary of Magnetic Fusion Devices Naka Fusion Research Establishment,
040308fukazawa.ppt
2004/03/08 @ICRR GLAST X MeV--GeV OSO-3 SAS-2 COS-B EGRET (CGRO) GLAST OSO-III (1967): SAS-2 (1972): 10 COS-B (1975): 3C273 EGRET(1991): E~10GeV 271 170 BLAZER 5 Isolated Neutron Star? CTA 1 SNR? EGRET
Mｏｔｔ散乱によるParity対称性の破れを検証
Mott Parity P2 Mott target Mott Parity Parity Γ = 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 t P P ),,, ( 3 2 1 0 1 γ γ γ γ γ γ ν ν µ µ = = Γ 1 : : : Γ P P P P x x P ν ν µ µ vector axial vector ν ν µ µ γ γ Γ ν γ
untitled
71 7 3,000 1 MeV t = 1 MeV = c 1 MeV c 200 MeV fm 1 MeV 3.0 10 8 10 15 fm/s 0.67 10 21 s (1) 1fm t = 1fm c 1fm 3.0 10 8 10 15 fm/s 0.33 10 23 s (2) 10 22 s 7.1 ( ) a + b + B(+X +...) (3) a b B( X,...)
atomic line spectrum emission line absorption line atom proton neutron nuclei electron Z atomic number A mass number neutral atom ion energy
1 22 22.1 atomic line spectrum emission line absorption line atom proton neutronnuclei electron Z atomic number A mass number neutral atom ion energy level ground stateexcited state ionized state 22.2
Analysis of Hypoxia Dynamics Using Pelagic and Benthic Biogeochemical Model: Focus on the Formation and Release of Hydrogen Sulfide Masayasu IRIE, Shu
Analysis of Hypoxia Dynamics Using Pelagic and Benthic Biogeochemical Model: Focus on the Formation and Release of Hydrogen Sulfide Masayasu IRIE, Shuzo NISHIDA, Kyosuke TERANAKA, Yohei TSUJI Mitsunari
untitled
SPring-8 RFgun JASRI/SPring-8 6..7 Contents.. 3.. 5. 6. 7. 8. . 3 cavity γ E A = er 3 πε γ vb r B = v E c r c A B A ( ) F = e E + v B A A A A B dp e( v B+ E) = = m d dt dt ( γ v) dv e ( ) dt v B E v E
Ando_JournalClub_160708
Independent discoveries of a tidally disrupting dwarf galaxy around NGC 253! A Tidally Disrupting Dwarf Galaxy in the Halo of NGC 253 Toloba, E. et al. 2016, ApJL, 816, L5 (hereafter T16, accepted 2015.12.07)
SC210301 Ł\†EŒÚ M-KL.ec6
30 36 01 02 07 08 05 95 11 94 11 97 13 91 13 9T 14 15 15 96 16 BE 16 BF 16 BG 17 CL 17 00 17 17 17 1 180 28 28 180 2 180 181 60 180 180 90 32 180 30 15 29 29 30 14 3 15 30 29 29 14 30 14 19 19 30 30 22
< F836F A815B934B8D87955C E706466>
92897 92893 10,000 92894 10,600 92895 11,300 92896 11,900 92897 11,900 92898 15,200 2 92888 92873 4,200 92874 4,200 92875 7,000 92876 7,000 92877 7,000 92878 8,800 92879 8,800 92880 13,300 92881 8,800
: 8.2: A group (i.e. a very small cluster) of galaxies superimposed on a x-ray image from the ROSAT satellite
1 8 8.1 8.1.1 8.1: ( Ω = ρ/ρ c ) (Fukugita, M. et al., APJ 503 (1998) 518) ( 15%) (z 0 ) 1.................. 0.0026 h 1 0.0043 h 1 0.0014 h 1 A 2..................... 0.00086 h 1 0.00129 h 1 0.00051 h
1. 2. 3. 2010-02- 22-24 1.1 1.1.1 1.1.2 1.1.3 F10.7 1.2 1.2.1 1.2.2 1.2.3 14 C 1.2.4 10 Be 1.2.5 14 C 10 Be 1.1 太陽放射とその変動 20100223-24森羅万象学校 1.1.1 (from Encyclopedia of Earth) op1cal depth (Lean et al.,
C el = 3 2 Nk B (2.14) c el = 3k B C el = 3 2 Nk B
I ino@hiroshima-u.ac.jp 217 11 14 4 4.1 2 2.4 C el = 3 2 Nk B (2.14) c el = 3k B 2 3 3.15 C el = 3 2 Nk B 3.15 39 2 1925 (Wolfgang Pauli) (Pauli exclusion principle) T E = p2 2m p T N 4 Pauli Sommerfeld
nenmatsu5c19_web.key
KL π ± e νe + e - (Ke3ee) Ke3ee ν e + e - Ke3 K 0 γ e + π - Ke3 KL ; 40.67(%) Ke3ee K 0 ν γ e + π - Ke3 KL ; 40.67(%) Me + e - 10 4 10 3 10 2 : MC Ke3γ : data K L real γ e detector matter e e 10 1 0 0.02
理論懇2014
Proposal for a project of high-precision stellar radial velocity work, Struve (1952)! But there seems to be no compelling reason why the hypothetical stellar planets should not, in some instances, be much
JAXA Sep., 2010 p.1/36
JAXA Sep., 2 p./36 Contents Sep., 2 p.2/36 ffi(e;v) ) =3 dv (E=W M X ψ( ;u) W=W du P X ψ(w;u) ) =3 du (W=W n3:9 = 6 (H=H c ) 2=3 GeV =3 o =cm =W =3 ; with H c =4:4 3 G M X Comparison of the cross-sections
km_atami09.ppt
Belle 2009 Feb. 28th Homework discussion (2008 12 6 7 ) Home Works for Theorists So far works are done mainly for interpreting the observed phenomena. But, we need more predictions. prediction qq( ) qqq(
Microsoft Word - mitomi_v06.doc
MSS mitomi@edm.bosai.go.jp matsuoka@edm.bosai.go.jp yamazaki@edm.bosai.go.jp taniguchi@manage.nitech.ac.jp 1 MSS MSS 2 2 1 m MSS CCT CCT Fig.1 CCT b02-b0 b0-b0b-b b-b1 CCT Landsat/TM MSS S/N 21x21 21x21
Donald Carl J. Choi, β ( )
:: α β γ 200612296 20 10 17 1 3 2 α 3 2.1................................... 3 2.2................................... 4 2.3....................................... 6 2.4.......................................
V(x) m e V 0 cos x π x π V(x) = x < π, x > π V 0 (i) x = 0 (V(x) V 0 (1 x 2 /2)) n n d 2 f dξ 2ξ d f 2 dξ + 2n f = 0 H n (ξ) (ii) H
199 1 1 199 1 1. Vx) m e V cos x π x π Vx) = x < π, x > π V i) x = Vx) V 1 x /)) n n d f dξ ξ d f dξ + n f = H n ξ) ii) H n ξ) = 1) n expξ ) dn dξ n exp ξ )) H n ξ)h m ξ) exp ξ )dξ = π n n!δ n,m x = Vx)
2008/02/18 08:40-10:10, 12:50-14:20 14:30-16:00, 16:10-17:40,
008/0/18 08:40-10:10, 1:50-14:0 14:30-16:00, 16:10-17:40, 1pt A 1911 Leiden Heike Kammelingh-Onnes H.Kammelingh Onnes 1907 He 1 4. K H H c T c T H c Hg:40 mt, Pb:80 mt, Sn:30 mt 100 mt I c H c H c H
;HgS 1998 ;Fe2O kg ; kg 1 Minami et al., S 33 S 34 S 36 S % 0.75% 4.21% S 34 S 34 S Ish
237 243 2013 Chikyukagaku Geochemistry 237 243 2013 Identification of the sources of vermilion in the burial mounds of the Late Yayoi to Kofun periods in the coast of Japan Sea of western Japan using sulfur
4 3 1 Introduction 3 2 7 2.1.................................. 7 2.1.1..................... 8 2.1.2............................. 8 2.1.3.......................... 10 2.2...............................
Undulator.dvi
X X 1 1 2 Free Electron Laser: FEL 2.1 2 2 3 SACLA 4 SACLA [1]-[6] [7] 1: S N λ [9] XFEL OHO 13 X [8] 2 2.1 2(a) (c) z y y (a) S N 90 λ u 4 [10, 11] Halbach (b) 2: (a) (b) (c) (c) 1 2 [11] B y = n=1 B
環境報告2008ダイジェスト版
2008 KEK Environmental Report 2008 2008 http://www.kek.jp/kankyou/pdf/kankyohoukokusho2008.pdf Inter-University Research Institute Corporation High Energy Accelerator Research Organization CO 2 CO 2 2007
E 1/2 3/ () +3/2 +3/ () +1/2 +1/ / E [1] B (3.2) F E 4.1 y x E = (E x,, ) j y 4.1 E int = (, E y, ) j y = (Hall ef
![E 1/2 3/ () +3/2 +3/ () +1/2 +1/ / E [1] B (3.2) F E 4.1 y x E = (E x,, ) j y 4.1 E int = (, E y, ) j y = (Hall ef](/thumbs/81/83176619.jpg "E 1/2 3/ () +3/2 +3/ () +1/2 +1/ / E [1] B (3.2) F E 4.1 y x E = (E x,, ) j y 4.1 E int = (, E y, ) j y = (Hall ef")
4 213 5 8 4.1.1 () f A exp( E/k B ) f E = A [ k B exp E ] = f k B k B = f (2 E /3n). 1 k B /2 σ = e 2 τ(e)d(e) 2E 3nf 3m 2 E de = ne2 τ E m (4.1) E E τ E = τe E = / τ(e)e 3/2 f de E 3/2 f de (4.2) f (3.2)
Trip Trip Trip
- - - - 1999 Leonid MAC Multi-Instrument Aircraft Campaign November 8-23, 1999 1998-2002 (2001 ) Predictions, Observational Plans and Results for Leonid 1998-2002. Photo Gallery taken by Photographic Camera
宇宙ガンマ線観測で解き明かす暗黒物
2/30 72% 5% 23% ~1 3/30 Matthew Newby, Milkyway@home mv 2 r v = = GmM(r) r 2 GM(r) r (km/s) (AU) 4/30 5/30 Mark Whittle, University of Virginia Department of Astronomy Adam Block/Mount Lemmon SkyCenter/University
加速器の基本概念 V : 高周波加速の基礎
.... V : KEK koji.takata@kek.jp http://research.kek.jp/people/takata/home.html 2015 2015 4 16 1 2 (1) 3 (2) 4 5 6 ERL: Energy Recovery Linac LCLS: Linac Coherent Light Source LC : µ-µ Koji Takata (KEK)
Kaluza-Klein(KK) SO(11) KK 1 2 1
Maskawa Institute, Kyoto Sangyo University Naoki Yamatsu 2016 4 12 ( ) @ Kaluza-Klein(KK) SO(11) KK 1 2 1 1. 2. 3. 4. 2 1. 標準理論 物質場 ( フェルミオン ) スカラー ゲージ場 クォーク ヒッグス u d s b ν c レプトン ν t ν e μ τ e μ τ e h
1 2 2 (Dielecrics) Maxwell ( ) D H
2003.02.13 1 2 2 (Dielecrics) 4 2.1... 4 2.2... 5 2.3... 6 2.4... 6 3 Maxwell ( ) 9 3.1... 9 3.2 D H... 11 3.3... 13 4 14 4.1... 14 4.2... 14 4.3... 17 4.4... 19 5 22 6 THz 24 6.1... 24 6.2... 25 7 26
[2] ATMUKN [3] (ATMU ATMUKN)[4] ( ) X tr = f photo photo + f incoh incoh + f pair pair = E h 0 (2) h 0 E 1 f photo =1; X h 0 f incoh f pair =1;
![[2] ATMUKN [3] (ATMU ATMUKN)[4] ( ) X tr = f photo photo + f incoh incoh + f pair pair = E h 0 (2) h 0 E 1 f photo =1; X h 0 f incoh f pair =1;](/thumbs/90/102488508.jpg "[2] ATMUKN [3] (ATMU ATMUKN)[4] ( ) X tr = f photo photo + f incoh incoh + f pair pair = E h 0 (2) h 0 E 1 f photo =1; X h 0 f incoh f pair =1;")
2001 4 17 1 ICRP90 (AP ) ICRP 2 2.1 (photoelectric eect) (coherent scattering) (incoherent scattering) ( (pair creation) (triplet creation)) = photo + coh + incoh + pair (cm ;1 ) (1) (linear attenuation
03J_sources.key
Radiation Detection & Measurement (1) (2) (3) (4)1 MeV ( ) 10 9 m 10 7 m 10 10 m < 10 18 m X 10 15 m 10 15 m ......... (isotope)...... (isotone)......... (isobar) 1 1 1 0 1 2 1 2 3 99.985% 0.015% ~0% E
COE
COE COOL05 MD @ @ @ @ n ν x, y 2 2 International Workshop on Beam Cooling and Related Topics ( COOL05) General Topics Overview. S-LSR Report from Lab Report from Lab Electron Cooling Muon Cooling
FPWS2018講義千代
千代勝実(山形大学) 素粒子物理学入門@FPWS2018 3つの究極の 宗教や神話 哲学や科学が行き着く人間にとって究極の問い 宇宙 世界 はどのように始まり どのように終わるのか 全てをつかさどる究極原理は何か 今日はこれを考えます 人類はどういう存在なのか Wikipediaより 4 /72 千代勝実(山形大学) 素粒子物理学入門@FPWS2018 電子レンジ 可視光では中が透け
J. Jpn. Inst. Light Met. 65(6): 224-228 (2015)
65 62015 224 228 ** Journal of The Japan Institute of Light Metals, Vol. 65, No. 6 (2015), 224 228 2015 The Japan Institute of Light Metals Investigation of heat flow behavior on die-casting core pin with
cm λ λ = h/p p ( ) λ = cm E pc [ev] 2.2 quark lepton u d c s t b e 1 3e electric charge e color charge red blue green qq
![cm λ λ = h/p p ( ) λ = cm E pc [ev] 2.2 quark lepton u d c s t b e 1 3e electric charge e color charge red blue green qq](/thumbs/89/98710373.jpg "cm λ λ = h/p p ( ) λ = cm E pc [ev] 2.2 quark lepton u d c s t b e 1 3e electric charge e color charge red blue green qq")
2007 2007 7 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 1 2007 2 4 5 6 6 2 2.1 1: KEK Web page 1 1 1 10 16 cm λ λ = h/p p ( ) λ = 10 16 cm E pc [ev] 2.2 quark lepton 2 2.2.1 u d c s t b + 2 3 e 1 3e electric charge
21 Daya Bay θ 13 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Brookhaven National Laboratory 2012 ( 24 ) Daya Bay 2011
21 Daya Bay θ 13 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory YNakajima@lbl.gov Brookhaven National Laboratory thide@bnl.gov 2012 ( 24 ) 5 16 1 Daya Bay 2011 12,, θ 13, 55 2012 3 sin 2 2θ 13 Daya Bay sin 2 2θ
2. TMT TMT TMT 1 TMT 3 1 TMT TMT PI PI PI SA PI SA SA PI SA PI SA
TMT TMT 181 8588 2 21 1 e-mail: n.kashikawa@nao.ac.jp TMT TMT TMT * 1 TMT TMT TMT SAC Science Advisory Committee 2012 8 13 1 1. 1 2 3 20 * 1 609 2. TMT TMT TMT 1 TMT 3 1 TMT 8 3 4 TMT PI 1 10 50 2.1 PI
/ Christopher Essex Radiation and the Violation of Bilinearity in the Thermodynamics of Irreversible Processes, Planet.Space Sci.32 (1984) 1035 Radiat
/ Christopher Essex Radiation and the Violation of Bilinearity in the Thermodynamics of Irreversible Processes, Planet.Space Sci.32 (1984) 1035 Radiation and the Continuing Failure of the Bilinear Formalism,
スケーリング理論とはなにか? - --尺度を変えて見えること--
? URL: http://maildbs.c.u-tokyo.ac.jp/ fukushima mailto:hukusima@phys.c.u-tokyo.ac.jp DEX-SMI @ 2006 12 17 ( ) What is scaling theory? DEX-SMI 1 / 40 Outline Outline 1 2 3 4 ( ) What is scaling theory?