: ) B 2.7) A B 2.7) 3) 4) 5) substring) subsequence) A LCStr, LCS s = s 1,..., s m, t = t 1,..., t m character) mo
|
|
- きゅうた やすもと
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 1,a) [1] BCCWJ) A B C 3 A B B C ) 1 NINJAL, Tachikawa, Tokyo , Japan 2 MEXT, Chiyoda, Tokyo , Japan a) masayu-a@ninjal.ac.jp ) A, B, C Information Structure) Information Status) Topic) Focus) [2] old) new) accessible) c 2015 Information Processing Society of Japan 1
2 : ) B 2.7) A B 2.7) 3) 4) 5) substring) subsequence) A LCStr, LCS s = s 1,..., s m, t = t 1,..., t m character) morpheme) string) character) character-based string) morpheme) morpheme-based) substring) n n-gram s i n-gram s i,...,i n+1 subsequence) p p-mer s p-mer i = i 1,..., i p 1 i 1 < i 2 < < i p s ) s[ i] Longest Common String: LCStr) Longest Common String) abbreviation LCS Longest Common Subsequence) LCS LCStr, LCS s, t : LCStrs, t) = arg max n s i,...,i n+1 j,s i,...,i n+1=t j,...,j n+1 s, t LCStr ) : c 2015 Information Processing Society of Japan 2
3 LCStr s, t) = max n i, j,s i,...,i n+1=t j,...,j n+1 [0,1] : Score LCStr s, t) = 2 LCStr s + t Longest Common Subsequence: LCS) Levenshtein s, t Longest Common Subsequence: LCS) : LCSs, t) = arg max i s[ i] j,s[ i]=t[ j] s, t LCS ) : LCSs, t) = max i i, j:s[ i]=t[ j] [0,1] : Score LCS s, t) = 2 LCS s + t ) Levenshtein ) LCS : d Levenshtein s, t) = s + t 2 LCS LCS Ulam LCS LCStr LCS LCS LCS LCSC, R) R ) LCSC, R) C ) LCSC, R) R = LCSC, R) C = arg max i j j j1) i, j,c[ i]=r[ j] arg max i i i i1) i, j,c[ i]=r[ j] R WLCS C, R) P WLCS C, R) R WLCS C, R) = α LCS RC,R) LCS LCS R P WLCS C, R) = α LCS CC,R) LCS LCS s Score γ) WLCS C, R) = 1 + γ2 )R WLCS C, R)P WLCS C, R) R WLCS C, R) + γ 2 P WLCS C, R) 2.3 / ROUGE-L [3] ROUGE-L [3] LCS) Score γ) ROUGE-L C, R) = 1 + γ2 ) R LCS C, R) P LCS C, R) R LCS C, R) + γ 2 P LCS C, R) R LCS C, R) P LCS C, R) : R LCS C, R) = LCSC,R) R P LCS C, R) = LCSC,R) C c i C r j R LCS ROUGE-W [3] LCS LCSC, R) R + LCSC, R) C fx) : fx + y) > fx) + fy), x > 0, y > 0, x N, y N N ) LCS ROUGE-W fx) = x α Score γ) C, R) WLCS ROUGE-N [3], [4] ROUGE-N [3], [4] n-gram c 2015 Information Processing Society of Japan 3
4 Score R) C, R) = ROUGE-N e n-gram clip C,R) e e n-gramr) e e n-gramc) C n-gram n-gramr) R n-gram n-gram clip C, R) n-gram e n-gramc) e n-gramr) : n-gram clip C, R) { n-gramc) if n-gramc) n-gramr) = n-gramr) otherwise ROUGE-SU) [3], [5] ROUGE-S 2-mer Score γ) ROUGE-S C, R) = 1 + γ2 )P s C, R)R s C, R) R S C, R) + γ 2 P S C, R) P S C, R) R S C, R) : e 2-mer clip C,R) P S C, R) = e e 2-merC) e 2-mer clip C,R) R S C, R) = e e 2-merR) p-merc): p-mer p-merr): p-mer p-mer clip C, R) p-mer e p-merc) p-mer e p-merr) : p-mer clip C, R) { p-merc) if p-merc) p-merr) = p-merr) otherwise ROUGE-SU ROUGE-S p = 2 p ESK [6] ESK [6] p-mer e e e Score p-mer ESK = C, R) u p-merc) v p-merr) λ e p) u u ) + u,u p-merc) λ e p δu, v) u v v,v p-merr) λ e p) v v ) [6] 2-mer BLEU[7] BLEU [7] n n-gram ω n ) P n-gram C, R) = BLEU e n-gram clip C,R) e e n-gramc) N Score BLEU C, R) = BP C, R) exp ω n log P n-gram C, R)) BLEU n=1 N n ω n = 1 Brevity Penalty BP) BPC, R) = { IMPACT [8] e 1 if C > R exp1 r c ) if C R IMPACT[8] LCS LCStr RN α r e β )) 1 r=0 e LCStrC R IP C, R) = r),r r) ) β R β RN α i e β )) 1 r=0 e LCStrC P IP C, R) = r),r r) ) β C β α rr RN) c 2015 Information Processing Society of Japan 4
5 α < 1.0) β LCStr β > 1.0) C 1) = C R 1) = R C r) = C r 1) \ {LCStrC r 1), R r 1) )} R r) = R r 1) \ {LCStrC r 1), R r 1) )} Score IP = 1 + γ2 )R IP P IP R IP + γ 2 P IP LCStr LCStr RN RIBES [9] RIBES [9] Score RIBES = d Kendall 1-gram align C, R)) P RIBES C, R)) α ) BPC, R) ) β d Kendall µ, ν) µ, ν Kendall 1-gram align µ, ν) [9] wonder 2 1-gram ) P RIBES C, R) = 1-gram align C,R) C 1-gram align µ, ν) wonder ) α β BLEU BP P RIBES C, R) : Score Kendall LRscore C, R) = α BP C, R) d Kendall Ĉ, ˆR) α)score BLEU ) [11] [0,1] ) : Score K s, t) = K s, t) K s, s) K t, t) - γ : Score γ) 1 + γ 2 )K s, t) K s, t) = K s, s)) 2 + γ 2 K t, t)) All String Kernel or Exact Matching Kernel) n u F all str P RIBES C, R) = Score P ) C, R) ROUGE-1 e e 1-gram clip C,R) = e LRscore [10] e 1-gramR) LRscore [10] Hamming Kendall Score Hamming LRscore C, R) = α BP C, R) d Hamming Ĉ, ˆR)+ 1 α)score BLEU Φ str : σ F all str R σ Φ str = ϕ us)) u σ Kn-grams, t) = Φ str s), Φ str t) F all str = u σ ϕ us)ϕ t s) ϕ us) = {i s i... = u} : K all seq s, t) = min s, t ) n=1 s n+1 i=1 t n+1 j=1 δs i...i+n 1, t i...i+n 1 ) 2002 c 2015 Information Processing Society of Japan 5
6 n-gram Length Weighted All String Kernel or Length Weighted Exact Matching Kernel) K all seq s, t) = min s, t ) n=1 s n+1 i=1 t n+1 j=1 ω s δs i...i+n 1, t i...i+n 1 ) ω n n IMPACT n- Suffix Tree n- n-gram Spectrum Kernel) n n-gram) n u Fn-gram Ψ seq : σ F all seq R σ Ψ seqs) = ψ vs)) v σ ψ vs) = { i s[ i] = v} K all seq s, t) = Ψ seqs), Ψ seqt) F all seq = v σ ψ vs) ψ vt) ψ vs) = { i s[ i] = v} K all seq s, t) O s t ) ϵ K all seq s, ϵ) = K all seq t, ϵ) = 1 K all seq s, t) K all seq s a, t) = K all seq s, t) + 1 i t,j:t j=a K all seq s, t i...j 1) K all seq s a, t) = K all seq s, t i...j 1 ) K all seq s a, t b) = K all seq s a, t) + δa, b)ks, t) t p p-mer) p v Fp-mer s Φ n str : σ Fn-gram R σ n Φ n str = ϕn us)) u σ n Kn-grams, t) = Φ n str s), Φn str t) Fn-gram = u σ p ϕ n us)ϕ n t s) ϕ n us) = {i s i...i+n 1 = u} : Kn-grams, t) = s n+1 i=1 t n+1 j=1 δs i...i+n 1, t j...j+n 1 ) ROUGE-N Kn-gramC, R) n-gram Kn-grams, t) 1-gram 1-mer BLEU BP v F all seq Ψ p seq : σ Fp-mer R σ p Ψ p seq s) = ψp vs)) v σ ψvs) = { i s[ i] = v} Kp-mers, t) = Ψ p seq s), Ψp seq t) Fp-mer = ψvs) p ψvt) p v σ p ψvs) p = { i s[ i] = v} ROUGE-S K 2-mer C, R) 2-mer ROUGE-SU K 1-mer,2-mer C, R) 1-mer, 2-mer Kp-mers, t) : p-mer λ ESK [6] p v Fp-mer c 2015 Information Processing Society of Japan 6
7 1 ) ) [0, 1] [0, ] [0, ] [ 1, 1] IMPACT [8] Score γ) K ) all str n-gram) ROUGE-N BLEU [7] Score γ) Kn-gram LRscore [10] n Score γ) K ) all seq p-mer) ROUGE-SU) [3], [5] Score γ) Kp-mer ESK [6] Score γ) Kgap p-mer Score rank θ p-mer p-mer ) Score footrule d footruleθ=1) RIBES? [9] Score Spearman d Spearmanθ=2) 2) Spearman s ρ Pearson s LRscore [10] Score Hamming d Hamming RIBES [9] Score Kendall d Kendall Kendall s τ ) LRscore [10] d Caylay d Ulam ) ROUGE-L Score LCS d Levenshtein ) ROUGE-W [3] Score γ) WLCS ) Score LCStr Kendall d Kendall 1, 4, 3, 2), 1, 2, 3, 4)) = ) ) ) d Kendall 2, 3, 1, 4), 1, 2, 3, 4)) = ) ) Caylay d Caylay 1, 4, 3, 2), 1, 2, 3, 4)) = ) Ulam d Ulam 1, 4, 3, 2), 1, 2, 3, 4)) = ) ) d Caylay 2, 3, 1, 4), 1, 2, 3, 4)) = ) ) d Ulam 2, 3, 1, 4), 1, 2, 3, 4)) = ) 1 c 2015 Information Processing Society of Japan 7
8 Kgap p-mers, t) = Ψ gap seq p p s), Ψgap seq t) Fp-mer = v σ p ψ gap p v s) ψ gap p t) ψv gap p s) = i:v=s[ i] λl i) li) = s i1,...,i v i = i 1,..., i v ) [12] m µ, ν S m m θ- : m d Rank θ µ, ν) = µi) νi) θ ) 1/θ i=1 θ = 1 Spearman footrule m d Footrule µ, ν) = µi) νi) ) i=1 θ = 2 Euclid Euclid 2 Spearman m d Spearman µ, ν) = µi) νi) 2 ) i=1 Spearman Euclid 2 [-1, 1] Spearman ρ Spearman s ρ = 1 6 d Spearman µ, ν) m 3 m µ, ν Pearson *1 Hamming d Hamming µ, ν) = v m δµi), νi)) i=1 Hamming 1) * µ ν Levenshtein 1 Kendall : Kendall d Kendall Swap) Kendall mm 1) 2 d Kendall = minarg max δπ q q=1 π 2k q, k q +1)) µ, ν)) q d Kendall = m m i=1 j=i+1 χi, j) χ i, j 0 1 : χ = { 1 if µi) µj))νi) νj)) < 0, 0 if µi) µj))νi) νj)) 0 [0,1] : Score Kendall = 1 2 d Kendall µ, ν) m 2 m [-1,1] Kendall τ Kendall s τ = 1 4 d Kendall µ, ν) m 2 m Cayley : Cayley d Caylay Swap) d Caylay = minarg max δπ q q=1 π 2k q, l q )) µ, ν)) q Ulam : Ulam d Ulam i, i + 1,..., j 1, j c 2015 Information Processing Society of Japan 8
9 µ ν Ulam d Ulam µ, ν) = m LCSµ, ν) [0,1] : Score Ulam µ, ν) = 1 d Ulam µ, ν) m LCSµ, ν) = m = Score LCS µ, ν) [13] swap Kendall Ulam Spearman s ρ Kendall s τ Daniels : 1 3m + 2) 2m + 1) τ m 2 m 2 ρ 1 m 1 3τ 2ρ 1 d Caylay d Kendall Footrule Kendall Cayley Diaconis-Graham inequality): d Kendall + d Caylay d Footrule 2 d Kendall Spearman Kendall Durbin-Stuart inequality): 4 3 d Kendall 1 + d Kendall m ) d Spearman [14] 1 Score {Score } ) ω Score = log Score = ω ΠScore ω 1 ω w log Score ) substring : n-gram ) subsequence : p-mer ) Ulam BCCWJ-SUMM) GROSS) RETELLING) 3 ) ) BCCWJ-SUMM C BCCWJ-SUMM C BCCWJ Yahoo! 15 ) BCCWJ 1 19 BCCWJ PN A) PC c 2015 Information Processing Society of Japan 9
10 2 BCCWJ-SUMM C BCCWJ-SUMM L GROSS C 71,111,113 GROSS L 4 7,6,3 RETELLING I 10 5 RETELLING K 3 3,3,3 3 RETELLING M BCCWJ-SUMM L BCCWJ-SUMM C FileID A A B B C C C D D D D E E E E E E F F BCCWJ-SUMM L BCCWJ-SUMM L BCCWJ BCCWJ- SUMM C ) FileID A A B B C C C Q ) : BCCWJ-SUMM LP)) BCCWJ-SUMM LT)) GROSS C GROSS C Yahoo! 15 ) 6.6) 6.4) 6.0) 3 * :71:111 :113295/300) GROSS L GROSS L ) GROSS C ) 6.4) 6.0) *2 [15] c 2015 Information Processing Society of Japan 10
11 max 227, min 85 ) 1 : GROSS LP)) GROSS LT)) RETELLING I Retelling [16], [17] [18] ) ) ) ) ) RETELLING IT)) RETELLING K [19] 3 * ) ) ) RETELLING K * : RETELLING KP)) RETELLING KT)) RETELLING M [20] ), 10 ) min:150 max:451 ) 107 min:74 max:152 ) ) 1 : RETELLING MP)) RETELLING MT)) n-gram 1,2,3,4) char/mrph) n-gram 2, 3, 4) char/mrph) p-mer 2,3,4) char/mrph) p-mer 2, 3, 4) char/mrph) 1-gram +Footrule char/mrph) =Spearman) 1-gram +Kendall char/mrph) A 1,A 2 Mean) SD) c m MeCab-0.98+IPADIC ) p n-gram1),n-gram2),pmer2),kendall unigramn-gram1)) GROSS LT) BCCWJ-SUMM LT) Bigramn-gram2)), skip-bigramp-mer2)) c 2015 Information Processing Society of Japan 11
12 Bigramn-gram2)) skip-bigramp-mer2)) bigram Kendall bi-gram BCCWJ-SUMM C BCCWJ-SUMM LP), GROSS C GROSS LP)) ) F ) ) * 4 BCCWJ-SUMM LP) GROSS LP) RETELLING KP) RETELLING MP) BCCWJ-SUMM LP) GROSS LP) Kendall char n-gram2,3,4) char, n- gram2,3,4, 2, 3, 4) mrph, Kendall mrph Footrule mrph, BCCWJ-SUMM LP) RETELLING KP) n-gram3,4) mrph BCCWJ-SUMM LP) RETELLING KM) GROSS LP) RETELLING {K,M}P) RETELLING KP) RETELLING MP) n-gram 3, 4) mrph,p-mer3,4, 3, 4) n-gram1) *4 = ) BCCWJ-SUMM LT) GROSS LT) RETELLING IT) RETELLING KT) RETELLING MT) BCCWJ-SUMM LT) GROSS LT) Kendall char n-gram2,3,4) char, n- gram2,3,4, 2, 3, 4) mrph, Kendall mrph Footrule mrph, BCCWJ-SUMM LT) RETELLING {I,K,M}T) GROSS LT) RETELLING {I,K,M}T) RETELLING IT) RETELLING KT) n-gram1,4, 2) char, p- mer2, 2) char RETELLING IT) RETELLING MT) Kendall char RETELLING IT) RETELLING MT) n-gram2, 2, 3, 4) char, p-mer2,3,4, 2, 3, 4) char n-gram1,2, 2, 3, 4) mrph, p- mer2,3,4, 2, 3, 4) mrph RETELLING {I,K}) RETELLING M) RETELLING I) RETELLING K) BCCWJ-SUMM C GROSS C c 2015 Information Processing Society of Japan 12
13 $"!!##!",!##!"+!##!"*!##!")!##!"!##!"'!##!"&!##!"%!##!"$!##!"!!## -../ # -../ # $"!!##!",!##!"+!##!"*!##!")!##!"!##!"'!##!"&!##!"%!##!"$!##!"!!## -../ # -../ #!"#$%&')*&$+,! -../ :9# ;<=225.# ;<= # ;<=22567:9# -../ :9# ;<=225.# ;<= # ;<=22567:9# 3 <>:>66?@;5A7:9# <>:>66?@;54789# <>:>66?@;547:9# <>:>66?@;5?7:9# <>:>66?@;5A789# <>:>66?@;5A7:9# <>:>66?@;54789# <>:>66?@;547:9# ) BCCWJ-SUMM C BCCWJ-SUMM LP) n-gram2) char, n-gram3) char, n-gram4) char BCCWJ-SUMM C) BCCWJ-SUMM LP)) ) GROSS C GROSS LP) n-gram2,3,4) char, $"!!##!",!##!"+!##!"*!##!")!##!"!##!"'!## 4BCD#!"&!##!"%!##!"$!## 2E#!"!!## $"!!##!",!##!"+!##!"*!##!")!##!"!##!"'!## 4BCD#!"&!##!"%!##!"$!## 2E#!"!!## -../ # -../ #!"#$%&')*&$+,! -../ :9# ;<=225.# ;<= # ;<=22567:9# <>:>66?@;5?7:9# <>:>66?@;5A789#!"#$%&&')*+! <>:>66?@;5A7:9# <>:>66?@;54789# <>:>66?@;547:9# -../ # -../ # -../ :9# ;<=225.# ;<= # ;<=22567:9# <>:>66?@;5?7:9# <>:>66?@;5A789# <>:>66?@;5A7:9# <>:>66?@;54789# <>:>66?@;547:9# n-gram1),n-gram2),p-mer2),kendall: ) n-gram2,3,4) mrph, Footrule mrph, Kendall mrph wikipedia BCCWJ-SUMM LP) BCCWJ-SUMM LT), GROSS LP) GROSS LT), RETELLING KP) RETELLING KT), RETELLING MP) RETELLING MT) BCD# 2E# 4BCD# n-gram n-gram p-mer, Footrule, Kendall n-gram, p-mer n, p n-gram, p-mer n or p) n or p) n or p) n-gram, p-mer n-gram1) * Kendall * n- gram1) * Kendall * 2E# c 2015 Information Processing Society of Japan 13
14 2.8 n-gram p-mer 7 ) Information Structure)[21] : Information Status) Topic) Focus) ) Götze[2] BCCWJ-SUMM 3.1 Götze[2] 5 Götze ) discourse referents) 5 Götze ) [2] Layers Tags Description giv Given ) Information Status) acc Accessible) new cat nil New ) cataphor ) ab Aboutness topic non-referential ) Topic) fs Frame setting topic nf New Information Focus Focus) cf Contrastive Focus ) information status) retrievability) given) accessible) new Prince [22] Prince { discourse-old) discoursenew)} { hearer-old) hearer-new)} 6) Prince [22] giv =, ) acc =, ) new =, ) Prince, ) topic) Jacobs[23] aboutness topic) frame setting topic) 2 what the sentence is about ) the frame within which the sentence holds ) : Frame-setting [23], p.656) X,Y) X Y Y X focus) contrast focus) Götze[2] Cook [24] c 2015 Information Processing Society of Japan 14
15 6 Prince Prince giv ) evoked acc) unused - new ) brand-new 588 aboutness topics Fleiss κ) NP NP new new - ) acc-inf new - acc-inf new Götze[2] 7 giv-active: giv-inactive *5 : acc-sit: ) acc-aggr: [2] Peter went shopping with Maria. They bought many flowers. acc-inf set-rel) giv acc-inf acc-inf: [2] part-whole: The garden beautiful. Its entrance is just across this river. set-rel: The flowers in the garden blossom. The flowers near the gate blossom violet. set-rel: The children swam in the lake. The family experienced a beautiful day. entity-attribute: The flowers enchanted Peter. Their scent was wonderful referent given) *5 inactive discourse-new + hearer-new semi-active textually accessible c 2015 Information Processing Society of Japan 15
16 7 Coarse) Fine) Description giv underspecified) given: giv-active giv-inactive active: inactive: acc underspecified) accessible: new nil cat) acc-sit acc-aggr acc-inf acc-gen situationally accessiblly accessible: aggregation: inferable: part-whole, set-relsubset/superset),entityattribute ) general: new: non-referential: cataphor: acc-gen: Type) ) Token) acc-gen acc-gen ) new ) new new: nil cat catphora) *6 3.3 MAMA [25] 1 [2] { ) *6 2 ) } discourse-old) ) giv-active ) giv-inactive giv-active ) acc-aggr discourse-new) acc-sit acc-inf activeness) - ) hearer-old) ) acc-gen ) ) hearer-new) new 3 ) ) ) ) 4 8 Fine)) Fine) c 2015 Information Processing Society of Japan 16
17 9 4 B-C ) B-C a-g a-i g-a g-i new nil acc-gen 3 3 acc-inf giv-active 1 1 giv-inactive new nil Coarse) 2 A, B, C 2 Cohen s)κ 3 Fleiss s)κ 1 B-C κ 9 4 B-C nil ) acc ) 3.4 ) giv ) acc ) BCCWJ NAIST [26] acc-aggr [27] 4. 2 ) 4.1 Kennedy [29] Dundee Eye- Tracking Corpus Dundee Eye-Tracking Corpus Demberg [30] Gibson Dependency Locality TheoryDLT) integration cost[31] Hale suprisal[32] Dundee Corpus Roland [33] Demberg [34] Dundee c 2015 Information Processing Society of Japan 17
18 8 Cohen s κ) A-B) B-C) C-A) Fleiss s κ 1 Fine) Coarse) Fine) = Coarse) Fine) = Coarse) Fine) Coarse) Corpus [35] Linger *7 5 1 Yes/No Question SRResearch EyeLinkCL 5 1 Yes/No Question 5 1/2 interest area grid ) interest area interest area BCCWJ 4.4 * : 5 : {,,,, } 5 : 15 [15] *8 [37] [38] *8 goitokusei/goi-test.html c 2015 Information Processing Society of Japan 18
19 First pass time Total time Regression path time ) ) ) A 3 A 4,A 5, ) accessible 4 [39] b) 1a) [40] 1) a. The lady i [ that GAP i visited the banker ]... b. The lady i [ that the banker visited GAP i ]... )[41][42] ) [31] 6 ) 6 ) 2) a. GAP i i... b. GAP i i... [43] Roland [44] c 2015 Information Processing Society of Japan 19
20 1a) 57% 43% 1b) 2% 98% 4a) 4b) Roland [44] abstract ) 3) a. ) The banker was very friendly. b. ) There was a dinner party on Saturday night. 4) a. The lady i [ that GAP i visited the banker ] enjoyed the dinner very much. b. The lady i [ that the banker visited the GAP i ] enjoyed the dinner [45] 4 ) BCCWJ % 30% 20% 80% 5) [45]p.63) ) 5)1-a. 1-b. 2-a. 2-b. 1 ) 1 ) 2 ) ) 2 ) ) 3. 3 ) [46][47][48] Gordon [46] 6) Gordon [46] *9 ) 6) a. It was the barber/john that saw the lawyer/bill in the parking lot. b. It was the barber/john that the lawyer/bill saw in the parking lot. [49][50][51] [50] 5 ) 7a) 7b) [50] 5 ) ) 7) a. b. [49] %) %) 656 6a) 31% 6b) 8% 6c) 45% [49] ) 8) a. GAP i i b. GAP i i *9 Gordon description: the barber, the lawyer ) name: John, Bill ) c 2015 Information Processing Society of Japan 20
21 c. ) GAP i 9 15 i d. - / + / [49] ) /357) /114) [52] [52] ) 9) a. 2-b. focus) ) ) ) ) ) accessible accessible-new kappa PC BCCWJ BCCWJ [53] c 2015 Information Processing Society of Japan 21
22 5.2 BCCWJ-Trans 11 BCCWJ-Trans A : σ : s = s 1,..., s m, t = t 1,..., t m character), character-based): σ s i σ σ morpheme), morpheme-based): σ s i σ σ string): character) character-based string) morpheme) morpheme-based) substring): n n-gram s i n-gram s i,...,i n+1 subsequence): p p-mer s p-mer i = i 1,..., i p 1 i 1 < i 2 < < i p s ) s[ i] / reference): / R / candidate): / / C distance): X 2 d : X X R dx, y) 0), x = y dx, y) 0), dx, y) = dy, x)), dx, y) + dy, z) dx, z)) absolute value): 0 x θ- norm): x =, x 1,..., x n θ- x θ = n i=1 x i p ) 1/p θ x ) 2- : ) similarity): correlation): [-1,1] kernel function): ) Ks, t) cosine Ks,t) Ks,s) Kt,t) ) score): [0,1] score prefix): suffix): subset): k k-element rank vector): i i m S m µ = µ1),..., µm) µi) i order vector): i i m T m µi) µ 1 = µ 1 1),..., µ 1 m) µ 1 i) i ) concordant): i j c 2015 Information Processing Society of Japan 22
23 11 BCCWJ-Trans OY 1, OC 1, PN 1, PB 1, PM 1, OW 1 ) OY 1, OC 1, PN 1, PB 1, PM 1, OW OY 6, OC 6, PN 1, PB 1, PM 1, OW OY 3, OC 3, PN 1, PB 1, PM 1, OW 1 : OY, OC, PN, PB, PM, OW µi) µj))νi) νj)) 0 discordant): : insertion) deletion) substitution) : symmetric group) : :permutation) µ 1 = µ 1 1),..., µ 1 m) µ 1 k 1 ), µ 1 k 2 ),..., µ 1 k r ) µ 1 k 1 ) µ 1 k 2 ), µ 1 k 2 ) µ 1 k 3 ),... µ 1 k 1 ) µ 1 k 2 )... µ 1 k r ) µ 1 k 2 ) µ 1 k 3 )... µ 1 k 1 ) π r = k 1, k 2,..., k r ) 2 ) transposition) π 2 = i, j) adjacent transposition) π 2 = i, i + 1) δ : δi, j) = A.2 { ) 1 i = j) 0 i j) A 1 A 2 BCCWJ-SUMM LT) RETELLING KT),RETELLING MT)) A.3 A 3 0-origin) ) A 4,A 5 ) ) ) 95% [-2.0, 2.0] * 2.5 **) NTT CS JSPS B) , B) B) [1] Maekawa, K., Yamazaki, M., Ogiso, T., Maruyama, T., Ogura, H., Kashino, W., Koiso, H., Yamaguchi, M., Tanaka, M. and Den, Y.: Balanced corpus of contemporary written Japanese, Language Resources and Evaluation, Vol. 48, pp ). [2] Götze, M., Weskott, T., Endriss, C., Fiedler, I., Hinterwimmer, S., Petrova, S., Schwarz, A., Skopeteas, S. and Stoel, R.: Information structure, Interdisciplinary Studies on Information Structure Dipper, S., Göetze, M., Skopeteas, S. and Stoel, R., eds.), Working Papers of the SFB 632, Vol. 7, Universiätsverlag, Potsdam, 2nd edition updated version 2014) edition, chapter Information Structure, pp ). [3] Lin, C.-Y.: ROUGE: A Package for Automatic Evaluation of Summaries, Proc. of Workshop on Summarization Branches Out, Post Conference Workshop of ACL 2004, pp ). [4] Lin, C.-Y. and Hovy, E.: Automatic Evaluation of Summaries Using N-gram Co-occurrence Statistics, Proc. of the 4th Meeting of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics and Human Language Technology, pp ). [5] Lin, C.-Y. and Och, F. J.: Automatic Evluation of Machine Translation Quality Using Longest Common Subsequence and Skip-Bigram Statistics, Proceedings of c 2015 Information Processing Society of Japan 23
24 A 1 score BCCWJ-SUMM C BCCWJ-SUMM LP) BCCWJ-SUMM LT) GROSS C GROSS LP) GROSS LT) Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD n-gram1) c n-gram2) c n-gram3) c n-gram4) c n-gram 2) c n-gram 3) c n-gram 4) c p-mer2) c p-mer3) c p-mer4) c p-mer 2) c p-mer 3) c p-mer 4) c Footrule c Kendall c n-gram1) m n-gram2) m n-gram3) m n-gram4) m n-gram 2) m n-gram 3) m n-gram 4) m p-mer2) m p-mer3) m p-mer4) m p-mer 2) m p-mer 3) m p-mer 4) m Footrule m Kendall m the 42nd Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, pp ). [6] Vol. 47, No. 6, pp ). [7] Papineni, K., Roukos, S., Ward, T. and Zhu, W.-J.: Bleu: a Method for Automatic Evaluation of Machine Translation, Technical report, IBM Research Report RC22176 W ) 2001). [8] Echizen-ya, H. and Araki, K.: Automatic Evaluation of Machine Translation based on Recursive Acquisition of an Intuitive Common Parts Continuum, Proceedings of the MT Summit XII Workshop on Patent Translation, pp ). [9] Kevin, D. Vol. 21, No. 3, pp ). [10] Birch, A. and Osborne, M.: LRscore for Evaluation Lexical and Reordering Quality in MT, Proceedings of the Joint 5th Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation and MetricsMATR, pp ). [11] Shawe-Taylor, J. Cristianini, N. ) Kernel Methods for Pattern Analysis) chapter 11 : 2010). [12] SIG-DMSM-A ). [13] Nivre, J.: Non-Projective Dependency Parsing in Expected Linear Time, Proceedings of the Joint Conference of the 47th Annual Meeting of the ACL and the 4th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing of the AFNLP, pp ). [14] Vol. 22, No. 2, pp ). [15] 1 CD-ROM 1999). [16] 31 pp ). [17] ). [18] ). [19] ). [20] ). [21] Lambrecht, K.: Information Structure and Sentence Form, Cambredge University Press 1994). [22] Prince, E. F.: Discourse description: Diverse linguistic c 2015 Information Processing Society of Japan 24
25 A 2 score RETELLING IT) RETELLING KP) RETELLING KT) RETELLING MP) RETELLING MT) Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD n-gram1) c n-gram2) c n-gram3) c n-gram4) c n-gram 2) c n-gram 3) c n-gram 4) c p-mer2) c p-mer3) c p-mer4) c p-mer 2) c p-mer 3) c p-mer 4) c Footrule c Kendall c n-gram1) m n-gram2) m n-gram3) m n-gram4) m n-gram 2) m n-gram 3) m n-gram 4) m p-mer2) m p-mer3) m p-mer4) m p-mer 2) m p-mer 3) m p-mer 4) m Footrule m Kendall m A 3 ) ID c 2015 Information Processing Society of Japan 25
26 A 4 :) ID ID First Pass Total Reg. Path analyses of a fund-raising text, chapter The ZPG letter: Subjects, definiteness, and information status, pp , Benjamins 1992). [23] Jacobs, J.: The dimensions of topic-comment, Linguistics, Vol. 39, pp ). [24] Cook, P. and Bildhauer, F.: Identifying aboutness topics : two annotation experiments, Dialogue and Discourse, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp ). [25] Pustejovsky, J. and Stubbs, A.: Natural Language Annotatino for Machine Learning A Guide to Corpus- Buildling for Applications, O Reilly 2012). [26] NAIST Vol. 17, No. 2, pp ). [27] 2009). [28] ). [29] Kennedy, A. and Pynte, J.: Parafoveal-on-foveal effects in normal reading, Vision Research, Vol. 45, pp ). [30] Demberg, V. and Keller, F.: Data from eye-tracking corpora as evidence for theories of syntactic processing complexity, Cognition, Vol. 109, No. 2, pp ). [31] Gibson, E.: Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies, Cognition, Vol. 68, pp ). [32] Hale, J.: A probabilistic earley parser as a psycholinguistic model, Proc. of the second conference of the North American chapter of the association for computational linguistics, Vol. 2, pp ). [33] Roland, D., Mauner, G., O Maera, C. and Yun, H.: Discourse expectations and relative clause processing, Journal of Memory and Language, Vol. 66, No. 3, pp ). [34] Demberg, V. and Keller, F.: Eye-tracking evidence for integration cost effects in corpus data, Proc. of the 29th meeting of the cognitive science society CogSci-07) 2007). [35] Just, M. A., Carpenter, P. A. and Woolley, J. D.: Paradigms and Processes in Reading Comprehension, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, Vol. 3, pp ). [36] ChaKi.NET 2) 5 pp ). [37] Amano, S. and Kondo, T.: Estimation of mental lexicon size with word familiarity database, Proceedings of International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, Vol. 5, pp ). [38] 2002). [39] 3 Part ). [40] King, J. and Just, M. A.: Individual Differences in Syntactic Processing: The role of Working Memory, Journal of Memory and Language, Vol. 30, pp ). [41] Hawkins, J. A.: Processing Complexity and Filler-Gap Dependencies Across Grammars, Language, Vol. 75, pp ). [42] O Grady, W.: Syntactic Development, The University of Chicago Press 1997). [43] Miyamoto, E. T. and Nakamura, M.: Subject/object asymmetries in the processing of relative clauses in Japanese, Proceedings of the 22nd West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics Garding, G. and Tsujimura, M., eds.), pp ). [44] Roland, D., O Meara, C., Yun, H. and Mauner, G.: Processing object relative clauses: Discourse or frequency, Poster presented at the CUNY sentence processing conference 2007). [45] 2011). [46] Gordon, P. C., Hendrick, R. and Johnson, M.: Memory Interference During Language Processing, Jounal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, Vol. 27, No. 6, pp ). [47] Gordon, P. C., Hendrick, R. and Levine, W. H.: Memory-load -interference in Syntacitic Processing, Psychological Science, Vol. 13, No. 5, pp ). c 2015 Information Processing Society of Japan 26
27 A 5 :) ID ID First Pass Total Reg. Path ** ** * * [48] Waters, G., Caplan, D. and Yampolsky, S.: On-line syntactic processing under concurrent memory load, Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, Vol. 10, pp ). [49] Kahraman, B., Sato, A., Ono, H. and Sakai, H.: Why object clefts are easier than subject clefts in Japanese: Frequency or expectation?, IEICE Technical Report, Vol. 111, No. 170, pp ). [50] Kahraman, B.: Processing gap-filler dependencies in Japanese and Turkish: Regarding the incrementality of sentence processsing, PhD Thesis, 2011). [51] Kahraman, B., Sato, A., Ono, H. and Sakai, H.: Incremental processing of gap-filler dependencies: Evidence from the processing of subject and object clefts in Japanese, The Proceedings of the 12th Tokyo Conference on Psycholinguistics, pp ). [52] gap-filler ERP 146 pp ). [53] Vol. 3, No. 2, pp ). [54] Vol. 23, No. 1, pp ). c 2015 Information Processing Society of Japan 27
A Japanese Word Dependency Corpus ÆüËܸì¤Îñ¸ì·¸¤ê¼õ¤±¥³¡¼¥Ñ¥¹
A Japanese Word Dependency Corpus 2015 3 18 Special thanks to NTT CS, 1 /27 Bunsetsu? What is it? ( ) Cf. CoNLL Multilingual Dependency Parsing [Buchholz+ 2006] (, Penn Treebank [Marcus 93]) 2 /27 1. 2.
More informationModal Phrase MP because but 2 IP Inflection Phrase IP as long as if IP 3 VP Verb Phrase VP while before [ MP MP [ IP IP [ VP VP ]]] [ MP [ IP [ VP ]]]
30 4 2016 3 pp.195-209. 2014 N=23 (S)AdvOV (S)OAdvV 2 N=17 (S)OAdvV 2014 3, 2008 Koizumi 1993 3 MP IP VP 1 MP 2006 2002 195 Modal Phrase MP because but 2 IP Inflection Phrase IP as long as if IP 3 VP Verb
More informationIPSJ-TOD
Vol. 3 No. 2 91 101 (June 2010) 1 1 1 2 1 TSC2 Automatic Evaluation of Text Summaries by Using Paraphrase Kazuho Hirahara, 1 Hidetsugu Nanba, 1 Toshiyuki Takezawa 1 and Manabu Okumura 2 The evaluation
More information¥ì¥·¥Ô¤Î¸À¸ì½èÍý¤Î¸½¾õ
2013 8 18 Table of Contents = + 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. etc. 1. ( + + ( )) 2. :,,,,,, (MUC 1 ) 3. 4. (subj: person, i-obj: org. ) 1 Message Understanding Conference ( ) UGC 2 ( ) : : 2 User-Generated Content [
More information自然言語処理25_527
Between Reading Time and the Information Status of Noun Phrases Masayuki Asahara Japanese noun phrases are not marked by articles. The information status of Japanese noun phrases is not overt. Due to limited
More informationComputational Semantics 1 category specificity Warrington (1975); Warrington & Shallice (1979, 1984) 2 basic level superiority 3 super-ordinate catego
Computational Semantics 1 category specificity Warrington (1975); Warrington & Shallice (1979, 1984) 2 basic level superiority 3 super-ordinate category preservation 1 / 13 analogy by vector space Figure
More information@08470030ヨコ/篠塚・窪田 221号
Abstract Among three distinctive types of Japanese writing systems Kanji, Hiragana and Katakana, a behavioral experiment using 97 university students as subjects implies that Katakana is regarded as most
More information[4], [5] [6] [7] [7], [8] [9] 70 [3] 85 40% [10] Snowdon 50 [5] Kemper [3] 2.2 [11], [12], [13] [14] [15] [16]
1,a) 1 2 1 12 1 2Type Token 2 1 2 1. 2013 25.1% *1 2012 8 2010 II *2 *3 280 2025 323 65 9.3% *4 10 18 64 47.6 1 Center for the Promotion of Interdisciplinary Education and Research, Kyoto University 2
More information21 Pitman-Yor Pitman- Yor [7] n -gram W w n-gram G Pitman-Yor P Y (d, θ, G 0 ) (1) G P Y (d, θ, G 0 ) (1) Pitman-Yor d, θ, G 0 d 0 d 1 θ Pitman-Yor G
ol2013-nl-214 No6 1,a) 2,b) n-gram 1 M [1] (TG: Tree ubstitution Grammar) [2], [3] TG TG 1 2 a) ohno@ilabdoshishaacjp b) khatano@maildoshishaacjp [4], [5] [6] 2 Pitman-Yor 3 Pitman-Yor 1 21 Pitman-Yor
More information2
NTT 2012 NTT Corporation. All rights reserved. 2 3 4 5 Noisy Channel f : (source), e : (target) ê = argmax e p(e f) = argmax e p(f e)p(e) 6 p( f e) (Brown+ 1990) f1 f2 f3 f4 f5 f6 f7 He is a high school
More informationBLEU Kishore Papineni, Salim Roukos, Todd Ward and Wei-Jing Zhu. (2002) BLEU: a method for Automatic Evaluation of Machine Translation. ACL. MT ( ) MT
4. BLEU @NICT mutiyama@nict.go.jp 1 BLEU Kishore Papineni, Salim Roukos, Todd Ward and Wei-Jing Zhu. (2002) BLEU: a method for Automatic Evaluation of Machine Translation. ACL. MT ( ) MT ( ) BLEU 2 BLEU
More information( )
NAIST-IS-MT1051071 2012 3 16 ( ) Pustejovsky 2 2,,,,,,, NAIST-IS- MT1051071, 2012 3 16. i Automatic Acquisition of Qualia Structure of Generative Lexicon in Japanese Using Learning to Rank Takahiro Tsuneyoshi
More informationIPSJ SIG Technical Report Vol.2010-NL-199 No /11/ treebank ( ) KWIC /MeCab / Morphological and Dependency Structure Annotated Corp
1. 1 1 1 2 treebank ( ) KWIC /MeCab / Morphological and Dependency Structure Annotated Corpus Management Tool: ChaKi Yuji Matsumoto, 1 Masayuki Asahara, 1 Masakazu Iwatate 1 and Toshio Morita 2 This paper
More information自然言語処理24_705
nwjc2vec: word2vec nwjc2vec nwjc2vec nwjc2vec 2 nwjc2vec 7 nwjc2vec word2vec nwjc2vec: Word Embedding Data Constructed from NINJAL Web Japanese Corpus Hiroyuki Shinnou, Masayuki Asahara, Kanako Komiya
More informationI
I 6 4 10 1 1 1.1............... 1 1................ 1 1.3.................... 1.4............... 1.4.1.............. 1.4................. 1.4.3........... 3 1.4.4.. 3 1.5.......... 3 1.5.1..............
More informationI A A441 : April 15, 2013 Version : 1.1 I Kawahira, Tomoki TA (Shigehiro, Yoshida )
I013 00-1 : April 15, 013 Version : 1.1 I Kawahira, Tomoki TA (Shigehiro, Yoshida) http://www.math.nagoya-u.ac.jp/~kawahira/courses/13s-tenbou.html pdf * 4 15 4 5 13 e πi = 1 5 0 5 7 3 4 6 3 6 10 6 17
More information数学の基礎訓練I
I 9 6 13 1 1 1.1............... 1 1................ 1 1.3.................... 1.4............... 1.4.1.............. 1.4................. 3 1.4.3........... 3 1.4.4.. 3 1.5.......... 3 1.5.1..............
More information医系の統計入門第 2 版 サンプルページ この本の定価 判型などは, 以下の URL からご覧いただけます. このサンプルページの内容は, 第 2 版 1 刷発行時のものです.
医系の統計入門第 2 版 サンプルページ この本の定価 判型などは, 以下の URL からご覧いただけます. http://www.morikita.co.jp/books/mid/009192 このサンプルページの内容は, 第 2 版 1 刷発行時のものです. i 2 t 1. 2. 3 2 3. 6 4. 7 5. n 2 ν 6. 2 7. 2003 ii 2 2013 10 iii 1987
More informationuntitled
18 1 2,000,000 2,000,000 2007 2 2 2008 3 31 (1) 6 JCOSSAR 2007pp.57-642007.6. LCC (1) (2) 2 10mm 1020 14 12 10 8 6 4 40,50,60 2 0 1998 27.5 1995 1960 40 1) 2) 3) LCC LCC LCC 1 1) Vol.42No.5pp.29-322004.5.
More information15 1970 Bransford, Barclay, & Franks, 1972; Mani & Johnson-Laird, 1982 3 Kintsch, Welsch, Schmalhofer, & Zimny, 1990 16 Kintsch, 1988; Kintsch, 1998; van Dijk & Kintsch, 1983 3 3 Glenberg, Meyer, and Lindem
More informationII (Percolation) ( 3-4 ) 1. [ ],,,,,,,. 2. [ ],.. 3. [ ],. 4. [ ] [ ] G. Grimmett Percolation Springer-Verlag New-York [ ] 3
II (Percolation) 12 9 27 ( 3-4 ) 1 [ ] 2 [ ] 3 [ ] 4 [ ] 1992 5 [ ] G Grimmett Percolation Springer-Verlag New-York 1989 6 [ ] 3 1 3 p H 2 3 2 FKG BK Russo 2 p H = p T (=: p c ) 3 2 Kesten p c =1/2 ( )
More information(MIRU2008) HOG Histograms of Oriented Gradients (HOG)
(MIRU2008) 2008 7 HOG - - E-mail: katsu0920@me.cs.scitec.kobe-u.ac.jp, {takigu,ariki}@kobe-u.ac.jp Histograms of Oriented Gradients (HOG) HOG Shape Contexts HOG 5.5 Histograms of Oriented Gradients D Human
More informationmain.dvi
305 8550 1 2 CREST fujii@slis.tsukuba.ac.jp 1 7% 2 2 3 PRIME Multi-lingual Information Retrieval 2 2.1 Cross-Language Information Retrieval CLIR 1990 CD-ROM a. b. c. d. b CLIR b 70% CLIR CLIR 2.2 (b) 2
More informationPart () () Γ Part ,
Contents a 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 7 7. 8.. 8.. 8.3. 8 Part. 9. 9.. 9.. 3. 3.. 3.. 3 4. 5 4.. 5 4.. 9 4.3. 3 Part. 6 5. () 6 5.. () 7 5.. 9 5.3. Γ 3 6. 3 6.. 3 6.. 3 6.3. 33 Part 3. 34 7. 34 7.. 34 7.. 34 8. 35
More informationJuly 28, H H 0 H int = H H 0 H int = H int (x)d 3 x Schrödinger Picture Ψ(t) S =e iht Ψ H O S Heisenberg Picture Ψ H O H (t) =e iht O S e i
July 8, 4. H H H int H H H int H int (x)d 3 x Schrödinger Picture Ψ(t) S e iht Ψ H O S Heisenberg Picture Ψ H O H (t) e iht O S e iht Interaction Picture Ψ(t) D e iht Ψ(t) S O D (t) e iht O S e ih t (Dirac
More information1 1 tf-idf tf-idf i
14 A Method of Article Retrieval Utilizing Characteristics in Newspaper Articles 1055104 2003 1 31 1 1 tf-idf tf-idf i Abstract A Method of Article Retrieval Utilizing Characteristics in Newspaper Articles
More informationa) Extraction of Similarities and Differences in Human Behavior Using Singular Value Decomposition Kenichi MISHIMA, Sayaka KANATA, Hiroaki NAKANISHI a
a) Extraction of Similarities and Differences in Human Behavior Using Singular Value Decomposition Kenichi MISHIMA, Sayaka KANATA, Hiroaki NAKANISHI a), Tetsuo SAWARAGI, and Yukio HORIGUCHI 1. Johansson
More informationhttp://www.ike-dyn.ritsumei.ac.jp/ hyoo/wave.html 1 1, 5 3 1.1 1..................................... 3 1.2 5.1................................... 4 1.3.......................... 5 1.4 5.2, 5.3....................
More informationgengo.dvi
4 97.52% tri-gram 92.76% 98.49% : Japanese word segmentation by Adaboost using the decision list as the weak learner Hiroyuki Shinnou In this paper, we propose the new method of Japanese word segmentation
More informationIPSJ SIG Technical Report Vol.2016-CE-137 No /12/ e β /α α β β / α A judgment method of difficulty of task for a learner using simple
1 2 3 4 5 e β /α α β β / α A judgment method of difficulty of task for a learner using simple electroencephalograph Katsuyuki Umezawa 1 Takashi Ishida 2 Tomohiko Saito 3 Makoto Nakazawa 4 Shigeichi Hirasawa
More information2 2.1 NPCMJ ( (Santorini, 2010) (NPCMJ, 2016) (1) (, 2016) (1) (2) (1) ( (IP-MAT (CONJ ) (PP (NP (D ) (N )) (P )) (NP-SBJ *
Emacs Emacs : Emacs 1 Emacs Emacs ( ) (NPCMJ ) 1 Emacs NPCMJ 2 1 2 2.1 NPCMJ (http://npcmj.ninjal.ac.jp/) (Santorini, 2010) (NPCMJ, 2016) (1) (, 2016) (1) (2) (1) ( (IP-MAT (CONJ ) (PP (NP (D ) (N )) (P
More informationNo. 3 Oct The person to the left of the stool carried the traffic-cone towards the trash-can. α α β α α β α α β α Track2 Track3 Track1 Track0 1
ACL2013 TACL 1 ACL2013 Grounded Language Learning from Video Described with Sentences (Yu and Siskind 2013) TACL Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics What Makes Writing Great?
More information1 7.35% 74.0% linefeed point c 200 Information Processing Society of Japan
1 2 3 Incremental Linefeed Insertion into Lecture Transcription for Automatic Captioning Masaki Murata, 1 Tomohiro Ohno 2 and Shigeki Matsubara 3 The development of a captioning system that supports the
More informationNINJAL Project Review Vol.3 No.3
NINJAL Project Review Vol.3 No.3 pp.107 116 March 2013 Learners Spoken Corpus of Japanese and Developmental Sequence of Verbs SAKODA Kumiko 1 C-JAS 2 2.1 1 1 8 13 3 OPI Oral Proficiency Interview 9 10
More informationStudies of Foot Form for Footwear Design (Part 9) : Characteristics of the Foot Form of Young and Elder Women Based on their Sizes of Ball Joint Girth
Studies of Foot Form for Footwear Design (Part 9) : Characteristics of the Foot Form of Young and Elder Women Based on their Sizes of Ball Joint Girth and Foot Breadth Akiko Yamamoto Fukuoka Women's University,
More information149 (Newell [5]) Newell [5], [1], [1], [11] Li,Ryu, and Song [2], [11] Li,Ryu, and Song [2], [1] 1) 2) ( ) ( ) 3) T : 2 a : 3 a 1 :
Transactions of the Operations Research Society of Japan Vol. 58, 215, pp. 148 165 c ( 215 1 2 ; 215 9 3 ) 1) 2) :,,,,, 1. [9] 3 12 Darroch,Newell, and Morris [1] Mcneil [3] Miller [4] Newell [5, 6], [1]
More informationJFE.dvi
,, Department of Civil Engineering, Chuo University Kasuga 1-13-27, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 112 8551, JAPAN E-mail : atsu1005@kc.chuo-u.ac.jp E-mail : kawa@civil.chuo-u.ac.jp SATO KOGYO CO., LTD. 12-20, Nihonbashi-Honcho
More information18 2 20 W/C W/C W/C 4-4-1 0.05 1.0 1000 1. 1 1.1 1 1.2 3 2. 4 2.1 4 (1) 4 (2) 4 2.2 5 (1) 5 (2) 5 2.3 7 3. 8 3.1 8 3.2 ( ) 11 3.3 11 (1) 12 (2) 12 4. 14 4.1 14 4.2 14 (1) 15 (2) 16 (3) 17 4.3 17 5. 19
More information自然言語処理21_249
1,327 Annotation of Focus for Negation in Japanese Text Suguru Matsuyoshi This paper proposes an annotation scheme for the focus of negation in Japanese text. Negation has a scope, and its focus falls
More informationn ξ n,i, i = 1,, n S n ξ n,i n 0 R 1,.. σ 1 σ i .10.14.15 0 1 0 1 1 3.14 3.18 3.19 3.14 3.14,. ii 1 1 1.1..................................... 1 1............................... 3 1.3.........................
More information28 Horizontal angle correction using straight line detection in an equirectangular image
28 Horizontal angle correction using straight line detection in an equirectangular image 1170283 2017 3 1 2 i Abstract Horizontal angle correction using straight line detection in an equirectangular image
More information4. C i k = 2 k-means C 1 i, C 2 i 5. C i x i p [ f(θ i ; x) = (2π) p 2 Vi 1 2 exp (x µ ] i) t V 1 i (x µ i ) 2 BIC BIC = 2 log L( ˆθ i ; x i C i ) + q
x-means 1 2 2 x-means, x-means k-means Bayesian Information Criterion BIC Watershed x-means Moving Object Extraction Using the Number of Clusters Determined by X-means Clustering Naoki Kubo, 1 Kousuke
More information研究シリーズ第40号
165 PEN WPI CPI WAGE IIP Feige and Pearce 166 167 168 169 Vector Autoregression n (z) z z p p p zt = φ1zt 1 + φ2zt 2 + + φ pzt p + t Cov( 0 ε t, ε t j )= Σ for for j 0 j = 0 Cov( ε t, zt j ) = 0 j = >
More informationZ: Q: R: C: sin 6 5 ζ a, b
Z: Q: R: C: 3 3 7 4 sin 6 5 ζ 9 6 6............................... 6............................... 6.3......................... 4 7 6 8 8 9 3 33 a, b a bc c b a a b 5 3 5 3 5 5 3 a a a a p > p p p, 3,
More informationmatsuda.dvi
The on-line full-text database of the Minutes of the Diet: Its potentials and limitations Kenjiro Matsuda Abstract The on-line full-text database of the Minutes of the Diet offers linguists a unique resource
More informationIPSJ SIG Technical Report Vol.2017-SLP-115 No /2/18 1,a) 1 1,2 Sakriani Sakti [1][2] [3][4] [5][6][7] [8] [9] 1 Nara Institute of Scie
1,a) 1 1,2 Sakriani Sakti 1 1 1 1. [1][2] [3][4] [5][6][7] [8] [9] 1 Nara Institute of Science and Technology 2 Japan Science and Technology Agency a) ishikawa.yoko.io5@is.naist.jp 2. 1 Belief-Desire theory
More informationii 3.,. 4. F. ( ), ,,. 8.,. 1. (75% ) (25% ) =7 24, =7 25, =7 26 (. ). 1.,, ( ). 3.,...,.,.,.,.,. ( ) (1 2 )., ( ), 0., 1., 0,.
(1 C205) 4 10 (2 C206) 4 11 (2 B202) 4 12 25(2013) http://www.math.is.tohoku.ac.jp/~obata,.,,,..,,. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 1., 2007 ( ).,. 2. P. G., 1995. 3. J. C., 1988. 1... 2.,,. ii 3.,. 4. F. ( ),..
More information浜松医科大学紀要
On the Statistical Bias Found in the Horse Racing Data (1) Akio NODA Mathematics Abstract: The purpose of the present paper is to report what type of statistical bias the author has found in the horse
More information[1], B0TB2053, 20014 3 31. i
B0TB2053 20014 3 31 [1], B0TB2053, 20014 3 31. i 1 1 2 3 2.1........................ 3 2.2........................... 3 2.3............................. 4 2.3.1..................... 4 2.3.2....................
More informationTable 1 Means and standard deviations of topic familiarity for the topics used in the study Note. standard deviations are in parenthesis.
The Japanese Journal of Psychology 2000, Vol. 71, No, 4, 345-350 Contrast effects of background stimulus person on attitude similarity judgement and interpersonal attraction: A study of topic familiarity
More information20 9 19 1 3 11 1 3 111 3 112 1 4 12 6 121 6 122 7 13 7 131 8 132 10 133 10 134 12 14 13 141 13 142 13 143 15 144 16 145 17 15 19 151 1 19 152 20 2 21 21 21 211 21 212 1 23 213 1 23 214 25 215 31 22 33
More informationKintsch, W. 1994 Text comprehension, memory, and learning. American Psychologist, 49, 294-303. Leon, J. A., & Penalba, G. E. 2002 Understanding causality and temporal sequences in scientific discourse.
More information25 7 18 1 1 1.1 v.s............................. 1 1.1.1.................................. 1 1.1.2................................. 1 1.1.3.................................. 3 1.2................... 3
More information2000年度『数学展望 I』講義録
2000 I I IV I II 2000 I I IV I-IV. i ii 3.10 (http://www.math.nagoya-u.ac.jp/ kanai/) 2000 A....1 B....4 C....10 D....13 E....17 Brouwer A....21 B....26 C....33 D....39 E. Sperner...45 F....48 A....53
More informationTOP URL 1
TOP URL http://amonphys.web.fc.com/ 3.............................. 3.............................. 4.3 4................... 5.4........................ 6.5........................ 8.6...........................7
More information24 I ( ) 1. R 3 (i) C : x 2 + y 2 1 = 0 (ii) C : y = ± 1 x 2 ( 1 x 1) (iii) C : x = cos t, y = sin t (0 t 2π) 1.1. γ : [a, b] R n ; t γ(t) = (x
24 I 1.1.. ( ) 1. R 3 (i) C : x 2 + y 2 1 = 0 (ii) C : y = ± 1 x 2 ( 1 x 1) (iii) C : x = cos t, y = sin t (0 t 2π) 1.1. γ : [a, b] R n ; t γ(t) = (x 1 (t), x 2 (t),, x n (t)) ( ) ( ), γ : (i) x 1 (t),
More informationHanbury-Brown Twiss (ver. 2.0) van Cittert - Zernike mutual coherence
Hanbury-Brown Twiss (ver. 2.) 25 4 4 1 2 2 2 2.1 van Cittert - Zernike..................................... 2 2.2 mutual coherence................................. 4 3 Hanbury-Brown Twiss ( ) 5 3.1............................................
More informationii 3.,. 4. F. (), ,,. 8.,. 1. (75%) (25%) =7 20, =7 21 (. ). 1.,, (). 3.,. 1. ().,.,.,.,.,. () (12 )., (), 0. 2., 1., 0,.
24(2012) (1 C106) 4 11 (2 C206) 4 12 http://www.math.is.tohoku.ac.jp/~obata,.,,,.. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7.,,. 1., 2007 (). 2. P. G. Hoel, 1995. 3... 1... 2.,,. ii 3.,. 4. F. (),.. 5... 6.. 7.,,. 8.,. 1. (75%)
More informationIPSJ SIG Technical Report 1, Instrument Separation in Reverberant Environments Using Crystal Microphone Arrays Nobutaka ITO, 1, 2 Yu KITANO, 1
1, 2 1 1 1 Instrument Separation in Reverberant Environments Using Crystal Microphone Arrays Nobutaka ITO, 1, 2 Yu KITANO, 1 Nobutaka ONO 1 and Shigeki SAGAYAMA 1 This paper deals with instrument separation
More information第5章 偏微分方程式の境界値問題
October 5, 2018 1 / 113 4 ( ) 2 / 113 Poisson 5.1 Poisson ( A.7.1) Poisson Poisson 1 (A.6 ) Γ p p N u D Γ D b 5.1.1: = Γ D Γ N 3 / 113 Poisson 5.1.1 d {2, 3} Lipschitz (A.5 ) Γ D Γ N = \ Γ D Γ p Γ N Γ
More informationAbstract This paper concerns with a method of dynamic image cognition. Our image cognition method has two distinguished features. One is that the imag
2004 RGB A STUDY OF RGB COLOR INFORMATION AND ITS APPLICATION 03R3237 Abstract This paper concerns with a method of dynamic image cognition. Our image cognition method has two distinguished features. One
More informationohpmain.dvi
fujisawa@ism.ac.jp 1 Contents 1. 2. 3. 4. γ- 2 1. 3 10 5.6, 5.7, 5.4, 5.5, 5.8, 5.5, 5.3, 5.6, 5.4, 5.2. 5.5 5.6 +5.7 +5.4 +5.5 +5.8 +5.5 +5.3 +5.6 +5.4 +5.2 =5.5. 10 outlier 5 5.6, 5.7, 5.4, 5.5, 5.8,
More informationIsogai, T., Building a dynamic correlation network for fat-tailed financial asset returns, Applied Network Science (7):-24, 206,
H28. (TMU) 206 8 29 / 34 2 3 4 5 6 Isogai, T., Building a dynamic correlation network for fat-tailed financial asset returns, Applied Network Science (7):-24, 206, http://link.springer.com/article/0.007/s409-06-0008-x
More informationInput image Initialize variables Loop for period of oscillation Update height map Make shade image Change property of image Output image Change time L
1,a) 1,b) 1/f β Generation Method of Animation from Pictures with Natural Flicker Abstract: Some methods to create animation automatically from one picture have been proposed. There is a method that gives
More informationIS1-09 第 回画像センシングシンポジウム, 横浜,14 年 6 月 2 Hough Forest Hough Forest[6] Random Forest( [5]) Random Forest Hough Forest Hough Forest 2.1 Hough Forest 1 2.2
IS1-09 第 回画像センシングシンポジウム, 横浜,14 年 6 月 MI-Hough Forest () E-mail: ym@vision.cs.chubu.ac.jphf@cs.chubu.ac.jp Abstract Hough Forest Random Forest MI-Hough Forest Multiple Instance Learning Bag Hough Forest
More information006 11 8 0 3 1 5 1.1..................... 5 1......................... 6 1.3.................... 6 1.4.................. 8 1.5................... 8 1.6................... 10 1.6.1......................
More informationIII 1 (X, d) d U d X (X, d). 1. (X, d).. (i) d(x, y) d(z, y) d(x, z) (ii) d(x, y) d(z, w) d(x, z) + d(y, w) 2. (X, d). F X.. (1), X F, (2) F 1, F 2 F
III 1 (X, d) d U d X (X, d). 1. (X, d).. (i) d(x, y) d(z, y) d(x, z) (ii) d(x, y) d(z, w) d(x, z) + d(y, w) 2. (X, d). F X.. (1), X F, (2) F 1, F 2 F F 1 F 2 F, (3) F λ F λ F λ F. 3., A λ λ A λ. B λ λ
More information‚åŁÎ“·„´Šš‡ðŠp‡¢‡½‹âfi`fiI…A…‰…S…−…Y…•‡ÌMarkovŸA“½fiI›ð’Í
Markov 2009 10 2 Markov 2009 10 2 1 / 25 1 (GA) 2 GA 3 4 Markov 2009 10 2 2 / 25 (GA) (GA) L ( 1) I := {0, 1} L f : I (0, ) M( 2) S := I M GA (GA) f (i) i I Markov 2009 10 2 3 / 25 (GA) ρ(i, j), i, j I
More informationcorpus.indd
22 JC-D-10-02 23 2 c 2011 21 1 I BCCWJ 3 1 BCCWJ 5 1.1 BCCWJ 3..................... 5 1.2 BCCWJ 2...................... 6 2 3 SC 7 2.1 SC SC............. 7 2.1.1 SC SC................... 7 2.1.2......................
More informationカルマンフィルターによるベータ推定( )
β TOPIX 1 22 β β smoothness priors (the Capital Asset Pricing Model, CAPM) CAPM 1 β β β β smoothness priors :,,. E-mail: koiti@ism.ac.jp., 104 1 TOPIX β Z i = β i Z m + α i (1) Z i Z m α i α i β i (the
More informationx T = (x 1,, x M ) x T x M K C 1,, C K 22 x w y 1: 2 2
Takio Kurita Neurosceince Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Indastrial Science and Technology takio-kurita@aistgojp (Support Vector Machine, SVM) 1 (Support Vector Machine, SVM) ( ) 2
More informationkawa (Spin-Orbit Tomography: Kawahara and Fujii 21,Kawahara and Fujii 211,Fujii & Kawahara submitted) 2 van Cittert-Zernike Appendix A V 2
Hanbury-Brown Twiss (ver. 1.) 24 2 1 1 1 2 2 2.1 van Cittert - Zernike..................................... 2 2.2 mutual coherence................................. 3 3 Hanbury-Brown Twiss ( ) 4 3.1............................................
More informationMantel-Haenszelの方法
Mantel-Haenszel 2008 6 12 ) 2008 6 12 1 / 39 Mantel & Haenzel 1959) Mantel N, Haenszel W. Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J. Nat. Cancer Inst. 1959; 224):
More informationDecember 28, 2018
e-mail : kigami@i.kyoto-u.ac.jp December 28, 28 Contents 2............................. 3.2......................... 7.3..................... 9.4................ 4.5............. 2.6.... 22 2 36 2..........................
More informationmain.dvi
SGC - 70 2, 3 23 ɛ-δ 2.12.8 3 2.92.13 4 2 3 1 2.1 2.102.12 [8][14] [1],[2] [4][7] 2 [4] 1 2009 8 1 1 1.1... 1 1.2... 4 1.3 1... 8 1.4 2... 9 1.5... 12 1.6 1... 16 1.7... 18 1.8... 21 1.9... 23 2 27 2.1
More informationN cos s s cos ψ e e e e 3 3 e e 3 e 3 e
3 3 5 5 5 3 3 7 5 33 5 33 9 5 8 > e > f U f U u u > u ue u e u ue u ue u e u e u u e u u e u N cos s s cos ψ e e e e 3 3 e e 3 e 3 e 3 > A A > A E A f A A f A [ ] f A A e > > A e[ ] > f A E A < < f ; >
More informationuntitled
JAIS 1 2 1 2 In this paper, we focus on the pauses that partly characterize the utterances of simultaneous interpreters, and attempt to analyze the results of experiments conducted using human subjects
More information³ÎΨÏÀ
2017 12 12 Makoto Nakashima 2017 12 12 1 / 22 2.1. C, D π- C, D. A 1, A 2 C A 1 A 2 C A 3, A 4 D A 1 A 2 D Makoto Nakashima 2017 12 12 2 / 22 . (,, L p - ). Makoto Nakashima 2017 12 12 3 / 22 . (,, L p
More informationuntitled
580 26 5 SP-G 2011 AI An Automatic Question Generation Method for a Local Councilor Search System Yasutomo KIMURA Hideyuki SHIBUKI Keiichi TAKAMARU Hokuto Ototake Tetsuro KOBAYASHI Tatsunori MORI Otaru
More information微分積分 サンプルページ この本の定価 判型などは, 以下の URL からご覧いただけます. このサンプルページの内容は, 初版 1 刷発行時のものです.
微分積分 サンプルページ この本の定価 判型などは, 以下の URL からご覧いただけます. ttp://www.morikita.co.jp/books/mid/00571 このサンプルページの内容は, 初版 1 刷発行時のものです. i ii 014 10 iii [note] 1 3 iv 4 5 3 6 4 x 0 sin x x 1 5 6 z = f(x, y) 1 y = f(x)
More informationThe Annual Report of Educational Psychology in Japan 2008, Vol.47, 148-158 Qualitative Research in Action:Reflections on its Implications for Educational Psychology Yuji MORO (GRADUATE SCHOOL OF COMPREHENSIVE
More information,.,. NP,., ,.,,.,.,,, (PCA)...,,. Tipping and Bishop (1999) PCA. (PPCA)., (Ilin and Raiko, 2010). PPCA EM., , tatsukaw
,.,. NP,.,. 1 1.1.,.,,.,.,,,. 2. 1.1.1 (PCA)...,,. Tipping and Bishop (1999) PCA. (PPCA)., (Ilin and Raiko, 2010). PPCA EM., 152-8552 2-12-1, tatsukawa.m.aa@m.titech.ac.jp, 190-8562 10-3, mirai@ism.ac.jp
More information日本看護管理学会誌15-2
The Journal of the Japan Academy of Nursing Administration and Policies Vol. 15, No. 2, PP 135-146, 2011 Differences between Expectations and Experiences of Experienced Nurses Entering a New Work Environment
More informationIPSJ SIG Technical Report Pitman-Yor 1 1 Pitman-Yor n-gram A proposal of the melody generation method using hierarchical pitman-yor language model Aki
Pitman-Yor Pitman-Yor n-gram A proposal of the melody generation method using hierarchical pitman-yor language model Akira Shirai and Tadahiro Taniguchi Although a lot of melody generation method has been
More informationy y=2 x x Dialogue Language Education & Technology, 44 The Journal of Physiology, 232 (2) The Age Factor in Second Language Acquisition Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19 (4) Flashbulb Memories
More informationOptical Flow t t + δt 1 Motion Field 3 3 1) 2) 3) Lucas-Kanade 4) 1 t (x, y) I(x, y, t)
http://wwwieice-hbkborg/ 2 2 4 2 -- 2 4 2010 9 3 3 4-1 Lucas-Kanade 4-2 Mean Shift 3 4-3 2 c 2013 1/(18) http://wwwieice-hbkborg/ 2 2 4 2 -- 2 -- 4 4--1 2010 9 4--1--1 Optical Flow t t + δt 1 Motion Field
More information14 2 5
14 2 5 i ii Surface Reconstruction from Point Cloud of Human Body in Arbitrary Postures Isao MORO Abstract We propose a method for surface reconstruction from point cloud of human body in arbitrary postures.
More information授受補助動詞の使用制限に与える敬語化の影響について : 「くださる」「いただく」を用いた感謝表現を中心に
Title 授受補助動詞の使用制限に与える敬語化の影響について : くださる いただく を用いた感謝表現を中心に Author(s) 山口, 真里子 Citation 国際広報メディア 観光学ジャーナル, 6, 69-89 Issue Date 2008-03-21 Doc URL http://hdl.handle.net/2115/34577 Type bulletin (article) File
More informationCVaR
CVaR 20 4 24 3 24 1 31 ,.,.,. Markowitz,., (Value-at-Risk, VaR) (Conditional Value-at-Risk, CVaR). VaR, CVaR VaR. CVaR, CVaR. CVaR,,.,.,,,.,,. 1 5 2 VaR CVaR 6 2.1................................................
More information橡表紙参照.PDF
CIRJE-J-58 X-12-ARIMA 2000 : 2001 6 How to use X-12-ARIMA2000 when you must: A Case Study of Hojinkigyo-Tokei Naoto Kunitomo Faculty of Economics, The University of Tokyo Abstract: We illustrate how to
More information.2 ρ dv dt = ρk grad p + 3 η grad (divv) + η 2 v.3 divh = 0, rote + c H t = 0 dive = ρ, H = 0, E = ρ, roth c E t = c ρv E + H c t = 0 H c E t = c ρv T
NHK 204 2 0 203 2 24 ( ) 7 00 7 50 203 2 25 ( ) 7 00 7 50 203 2 26 ( ) 7 00 7 50 203 2 27 ( ) 7 00 7 50 I. ( ν R n 2 ) m 2 n m, R = e 2 8πε 0 hca B =.09737 0 7 m ( ν = ) λ a B = 4πε 0ħ 2 m e e 2 = 5.2977
More informationDEIM Forum 2009 C8-4 QA NTT QA QA QA 2 QA Abstract Questions Recomme
DEIM Forum 2009 C8-4 QA NTT 239 0847 1 1 E-mail: {kabutoya.yutaka,kawashima.harumi,fujimura.ko}@lab.ntt.co.jp QA QA QA 2 QA Abstract Questions Recommendation Based on Evolution Patterns of a QA Community
More information独立行政法人情報通信研究機構 Development of the Information Analysis System WISDOM KIDAWARA Yutaka NICT Knowledge Clustered Group researched and developed the infor
独立行政法人情報通信研究機構 KIDAWARA Yutaka NICT Knowledge Clustered Group researched and developed the information analysis system WISDOM as a research result of the second medium-term plan. WISDOM has functions that
More information1 (Contents) (1) Beginning of the Universe, Dark Energy and Dark Matter Noboru NAKANISHI 2 2. Problem of Heat Exchanger (1) Kenji
8 4 2018 6 2018 6 7 1 (Contents) 1. 2 2. (1) 22 3. 31 1. Beginning of the Universe, Dark Energy and Dark Matter Noboru NAKANISHI 2 2. Problem of Heat Exchanger (1) Kenji SETO 22 3. Editorial Comments Tadashi
More information18 I ( ) (1) I-1,I-2,I-3 (2) (3) I-1 ( ) (100 ) θ ϕ θ ϕ m m l l θ ϕ θ ϕ 2 g (1) (2) 0 (3) θ ϕ (4) (3) θ(t) = A 1 cos(ω 1 t + α 1 ) + A 2 cos(ω 2 t + α
18 I ( ) (1) I-1,I-2,I-3 (2) (3) I-1 ( ) (100 ) θ ϕ θ ϕ m m l l θ ϕ θ ϕ 2 g (1) (2) 0 (3) θ ϕ (4) (3) θ(t) = A 1 cos(ω 1 t + α 1 ) + A 2 cos(ω 2 t + α 2 ), ϕ(t) = B 1 cos(ω 1 t + α 1 ) + B 2 cos(ω 2 t
More information7 π L int = gψ(x)ψ(x)φ(x) + (7.4) [ ] p ψ N = n (7.5) π (π +,π 0,π ) ψ (σ, σ, σ )ψ ( A) σ τ ( L int = gψψφ g N τ ) N π * ) (7.6) π π = (π, π, π ) π ±
7 7. ( ) SU() SU() 9 ( MeV) p 98.8 π + π 0 n 99.57 9.57 97.4 497.70 δm m 0.4%.% 0.% 0.8% π 9.57 4.96 Σ + Σ 0 Σ 89.6 9.46 K + K 0 49.67 (7.) p p = αp + βn, n n = γp + δn (7.a) [ ] p ψ ψ = Uψ, U = n [ α
More information‰gficŒõ/’ÓŠ¹
The relationship between creativity of Haiku and idea search space YOSHIDA Yasushi This research examined the relationship between experts' ranking of creative Haiku (a Japanese character poem including
More information= hυ = h c λ υ λ (ev) = 1240 λ W=NE = Nhc λ W= N 2 10-16 λ / / Φe = dqe dt J/s Φ = km Φe(λ)v(λ)dλ THBV3_0101JA Qe = Φedt (W s) Q = Φdt lm s Ee = dφe ds E = dφ ds Φ Φ THBV3_0102JA Me = dφe ds M = dφ ds
More informationI. (CREMONA ) : Cremona [C],., modular form f E f. 1., modular X H 1 (X, Q). modular symbol M-symbol, ( ) modular symbol., notation. H = { z = x
I. (CREMONA ) : Cremona [C],., modular form f E f. 1., modular X H 1 (X, Q). modular symbol M-symbol, ( ). 1.1. modular symbol., notation. H = z = x iy C y > 0, cusp H = H Q., Γ = PSL 2 (Z), G Γ [Γ : G]
More informationThe copyright of this material is retained by the Information Processing Society of Japan (IPSJ). The material has been made available on the website
The copyright of this material is retained by the Information Processing Society of Japan (IPSJ). The material has been made available on the website by the author(s) under the agreement with the IPSJ.
More information