橡328_339.PDF

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "橡328_339.PDF"

けいざぶろうたにしき
5 years ago
Views:

1 A. (1992) Rozin & Fallon(1987) / (1992)

2 Birch,L.L 1996Birch (Birch,1979a,b) (sensory-specific satiety ; Birch & Deysher,1986) (neophobia ; Birch & Marlin,1982) (Birch, Billman, & Richards,1984) (Birch, Zimmerman, & Hind,1980) (Harper & Sanders,1975 ; Birch,1980) Birch et al.(1984) Birch (e.g.,birch,1979a,b ) (Birch, Billman, & Richards, 1984) B. 1. 1) ) i) 42 ( 12.3cm 18.3cm) (1996) Birch ii) ( ) ( ) ( ) 2) 42

3 2. 1) (range 18 55) 2) 42 ( 12.3cm 18.3cm) 3) (1) (2) 3. (1992,1996) e.g., e.g., e.g., e.g., e.g., e.g., e.g., e.g., e.g., e.g., e.g., e.g., e.g., e.g., e.g., e.g., e.g., e.g., e.g., e.g., e.g., e.g., e.g.,

4 e.g., e.g., e.g., e.g., e.g., e.g., e.g., e.g., e.g., e.g., (2.2%) 40(2.8%) C. 1. 1) SAS ) t=3.24, p<.01; t=6.62, p<.001

5 (35.5%) (25.8%) 19.4% (47.4%) (25.9%) (25.0%) 1.7% (42.0%) (25.2%) (23.5%) (9.2%) % (29.4%) 17.6% (40.0%) 20.0% 52.3% (26.7%) (18.6%) 2.3% 35.7% 28.6% 75.0% 25.0% 44.3% (29.1%) (24.1%) 2.5% 44.3% (33.3%) (16.7%) (8.3%) 50.0% 28.6% 14.7% 7.1% (15.1%) 867(13.9%) 3870(61.8%) 576(9.2%) 25(0.4%) (7.6%) 2828(37.2%) 4159(54.7%) 40(0.5%) 638(67.5%) 216(24.9%) 1679(43.4%) 321(55.8%) 304(10.8%) 786(18.9%) 1) i)42 ( %) ( %) 32.6% (24.5%)

6 (23.8%) 12.5% 19.0% 54.5% 62.9% 54.9% 37.7% 5.9% 4.2% 62.9% 18.2% 14.5% 18.4% 12.2% 12.5% 18.1% % ii) 2) 3) 10 (39.6% 52.8%) 19.7% 8.7%

7 (26.4%) (17.0%) (11.3%) 23.5% (10.8%) (7.8%) 4.3% 17.0% (39.8%) 11.5% 29.7% (5.5%) 3.8% 15.3% 21.3% 31.8% 38.4% 17.1% 16.4% 8.9% 15.3% (23.3%) (8.4%) (6.8%) 2.1% 1.4% (8.7%) (7.5%) 4) % 56.0% 0% 85.2% 51.4% 5) % 75.6% 18.2% 7.9% 10.3% 0.1% 1.9% 65.9% 44.4% 9.1% 9.8% 22.3% 38.3% 0% 10.8%

8 44.4% 50.0% 6) % 91.5% 23.1% 20.0% D. 1. 1) 42 Ganchrow, Steiner, & Dahler (1983) Desor,Green,& Maller(1975) (1995) (1995)

9 2) 42 Rozin,Hammer,Oster, Horiwitz, &Marmora (1986) Rozin et al.(1986) (1995) 15 3) Birch&Marlin(1982) Harper & Sanders(1975), Birch (1980)

10 1) 2.

11 Birch,L.L., Zimmerman,S.I., & Hind,H The influence of social-affective context on the formation of children s food preference. Child Development, 51, Desor,J.A., Greene,L.S., & Maller,O Preferences for sweet and salty in 9- to 15-year-old and adults humans. Science, 190, Ganchrow,J.R., Steiner.J.E., &Dahler,M Neonatal facial expressions in response to different qualities and intensities of gustatory stimuli. Infant Behavior and Development, 6, Harper,L.V., & Sanders,K.M The effect of adults eating on young children s acceptance of unfamiliar foods. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 20, , E. 33, Birch,L.L. 1979a Dimensions of preschool children s KTC food preferences. Journal of Nutrition Education, Rozin,P. & Fallon,A.E Aperspective on disgust. 11, Psychological Review, 94, Birch,L.L. 1979b Preschool children s food preferences Rozin,P.,Hammer,L.,Oster,H.,Horowitz,T.,&Marmora,V. and consumption patterns. Journal of Nutrition 1986 The child's conception of food: Differentiation of Education, 11, categories of rejected substances in the 16 months to 5 Birch,L.L Effects of peer model s food choices and year age range. Appetite,7, eating behaviors on Preschoolers food preferences. Child Development, 51, Birch,L.L., Billman,J., & Richards,S.S Time of day influences food acceptability. Appetite, 5, Birch,L.L. & Deysher,M Caloric compensation and sensory specific satiety ; Evidence for self regulation of food intake by young children. Appetite, 7, Birch,L.L. & Marlin,D.W I don t like it, I never tried it ; Effects of exposure on Two-year-old children s food preference. Appetite, 3,

越智59.qxd

越智59.qxd Social Skills Training; SST SST Social Skills, SST, ;, SST, SST SST, ;, ; DeRosier & Marcus,, ;, a b SST Ladd & Mize, ; Hansen, Nagle, & Meyer,,, A BC SST SST SST SST SST SST, SST Goldstein & McGinnis,

橡328_339.PDF

橡328_339.PDF