3 exotica
|
|
|
- みりあ あると
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 ( / )
2 embedding tensors (non)geometric fluxes exotic branes +
3
4 D U-duality G 0 R-symmetry H dim(g 0 /H) T-duality IIA R IIB SL(2, R) SO(2) GL(2, R) SO(2) 3 SO(1, 1) 8 SL(3, R) SL(2, R) SO(3) SO(2) 7 SL(2, R) SL(2, R) 7 SL(5, R) Sp(2) 14 SL(4, R) 6 SO(5, 5) Sp(2) Sp(2) 25 SO(4, 4) 5 E 6(6) USp(8) 42 SO(5, 5) 4 E 7(7) SU(8) 70 SO(6, 6) 3 E 8(8) SO(16) 128 SO(7, 7) 11
5 32...
6 ( )
7 +
8 +
9 + (non)geometric fluxes
10 embedding tensors +
11 + embedding tensors (non)geometric fluxes
12 + exotic branes
13 + (non)geometric fluxes exotic branes
14 + embedding tensors exotic branes
15 + embedding tensors (non)geometric fluxes exotic branes
16
17 Contents Q ab c (Non)geometric Fluxes Θ M α Embedding Tensors b c n Exotic Branes
18
19 Calabi-Yau Calabi-Yau 3-fold Ricci Kähler SU(3) SU(4) SO(6) ds 2 10D = η µν (x) dx µ dx ν 4D + g mn (x, y) dy m dy n CY Levi-Civita 2 (J) 3 (Ω) dj = [m J np] = 0 dω = [m Ω npq] = 0 THREE EXOTICA
20 non-cy 3-fold Ricci 2-form (non-kähler) dj 0 and/or dω 0 CY dj = 3 2 Im(W 1Ω) + W 4 J + W 3, dω = W 1 J J + W 2 J + W 5 Ω THREE EXOTICA
21 (dj, dω) D d H fl f Q R ( ) ( β I I eλ m ΛI D α I e ΛI m Λ I (H = H fl + db) )( ) ω Λ ω Λ e 0 I, e 0I : H-flux charges (H fl = e 0 I α I + e 0I β I ) e a I, e ai : m ΛI, m Λ I: geometric flux charges ( ) Non-geometric flux charges (e Λ I, e ΛI ) THREE EXOTICA
22 Exotic feature Non-geometric structure = Diffeo (GL(d, R)) (O(d, d), U- ) }{{} GL(d, R) duality transf. Generalized Geometry Doubled Geometry THREE EXOTICA
23 Generalized geometries g mn geometry associated with g mn Conventional geometry (manifold) O(6) global symmetry M 6 geometry associated with g mn, B mn Generalized geometry O(6, 6) T-duality symmetry geometry associated with g mn, B mn, C (p) Exceptional generalized geometry E 7(7) U-duality symmetry THREE EXOTICA
24 4 ( ) µ q u = µ q u + g k u Λ A Λ µ + g k uλ A µλ k Λ = [ 2 e RΛ + e I ] Λ (C H ξ) I a e Λ I k Λ = [ 2 m Λ R + m ΛI (C H ξ) I ] a + mλi ξ I ξ I (RR fluxes m Λ R ) h uv µ q u µ q v M AB H A µνρ H µνρb THREE EXOTICA
25
26 A M µ G 0 T M Θ M α t α t α Lie G 0 global T M Lie G gauge µ D µ µ ga M µ T M... THREE EXOTICA
27 Exotic feature [T M, T N ] = T MN P T P T M = Θ M α t α T MN P T (MN) P Θ P α = 0 F 2 = da + A A THREE EXOTICA
28 Exotic feature p-form potentials Hodge-dual in D-dim (D p 2)-form potentials ( ) D = 4 { Θ M α ( ) ( ) THREE EXOTICA
29 Embedding tensor formalism : Θ M α dim G dim G 0 ( Dµ = µ ga M µ Θ M α t α ) D U-duality G 0 constraints on R(M) R(α) 9 GL(2) (2 1) (3 1) = SL(3) SL(2) (3, 2) [(8, 1) (1, 3)] = (3, 2) (3, 2) (3, 4) (6, 2) (15, 2) 7 SL(5) = SO(5, 5) = E 6(6) = E 7(7) = E 8(8) = F.Riccioni, D.Steele and P.West, arxiv: THREE EXOTICA
30 Embedding tensors µ ϕ A = µ ϕ A g K A Σ A Σ µ g K AΣ A µσ K Σ = Θ Σ m (t m ) α β B a β (U 1 ) Aa α K Σ = Θ Σm (t m ) α β B a β (U 1 ) Aa α ϕ A ϕ A (Θ M m ) G AB µ ϕ A µ ϕ B M mn H m µνρ H µνρn THREE EXOTICA
31 Embedding tensors Θ Σm : nongeometric flux charges (?) Nongeometric flux compactifications work in progress... THREE EXOTICA
32 Embedding tensors D 32-SUSY 16-SUSY 8-SUSY 9 arxiv: (unknown) 8 arxiv: (unknown) 7 hep-th/ (unknown) 6 arxiv: (unknown) arxiv: hep-th/ hep-th/ (unknown) 4 arxiv: hep-th/ arxiv: hep-th/ arxiv: arxiv: THREE EXOTICA
33
34 : M-theory on S 1 (R s ) mass/tension (l s 1) type IIA longitudinal M2 1 F1 transverse M2 longitudinal M5 transverse M5 longitudinal KK6 RTN 2 gs 2 KK6 with R TN = R s 1 1 g s 1 g s 1 g 2 s g s D2 D4 NS5 KK5 D M S 1 R 3 KK Taub-NUT b c n : M = (R 1 R c ) 2 g n s transverse KK6 R 2 TN g 3 s for review: N. Obers and B. Pioline, hep-th/ THREE EXOTICA
35 Exotic feature brane M = (R 8R 9 ) 2 g 2 s NS T-dual along x 9 KK T-dual along x THREE EXOTICA
36 Exotic feature ds 2 = dt 2 + dx H(dr 2 + r 2 dθ 2 ) + H K dx2 89 B 89 = θ σ K, e2φ = H K, K H2 + σ 2 θ 2 ( µ ) H(r) = h + σ log, σ R 8R 9 r 2πα θ = 0 : G 88 = G 99 = H 1 θ = 2π : G 88 = G 99 = H H 2 + (2πσ) 2 Globally nongeometric : θ- fiber T 89 single-valued Locally geometric : (non)geometric flux Q ab c T-fold THREE EXOTICA
37 Exotic feature exotic branes D- co-dim. 2, 1 co-dim. 2 : Defect Branes (D 2)-form potentials co-dim. 1 : Domain Walls (D 1)-form potentials D- THREE EXOTICA
38 (D 1)-form potentials D-form field strengths Domain Walls
39 (D 1)-form potentials D-form field strengths Domain Walls 0-form field strengths = Deformation Parameters
40 Domain Walls D8-brane in 10-dim. RR potential C 9 10 dc 9 = m ( ) IIA Romans massive IIA SUGRA (D 2)-branes in D-dim. SUSY Domain Walls Domain Walls Domain Walls THREE EXOTICA
41 Domain Walls (D 1)-form potentials DWs + Θ M α D (D 1)-form potentials THREE EXOTICA
42 U-duality G 0 form potentials D U-duality G 0 1-forms 2-forms 3-forms 4-forms 5-forms 6-forms 7-forms 8-forms 9-forms 10-forms IIA R IIB SL(2, R) GL(2, R) SL(3, R) SL(2, R) (3, 2) (3, 1) (1, 2) (3, 1) (3, 2) (8, 1) (1, 3) 7 SL(5, R) SO(5, 5) E 6(6) E 7(7) E 8(8) (6, 2) (3, 2) (15, 1) (3, 3) (3, 1) (3, 1) (D 1)-forms Embedding Tensors Θ M α F.Riccioni, D.Steele and P.West, arxiv: THREE EXOTICA
43 # of (Elementary SUSY) DWs fundamental Dirichlet solitonic D n = 0 n = 1 n = 2 n = 3 n = 4 n = 5 # IIA (1, 2) T 4 (3, 2) T T 4 10 T T T 1 T 6 8 S T C T S T 8 C T T T T T T T T T 32 T T 64 T T T T T T 2160 (α 6) T, 6 64 T, 7 1 T, 8 brane s tension g +n s E.A. Bergshoeff et al, arxiv: , arxiv: THREE EXOTICA
44 String theory origin of EDWs in D-dim. D n = 0 n = 1 n = 2 n = 3 n = 4 n 5 IIA D8 [C 9 ] 9 D7 [C 8 ] 7 (0,1) 3 [E 9,1,1 ] 8 D6 [C 7 ] 6 (1,1) 3 [E 9,2,1 ] 7 D5 [C 6 ] NS5 [D 6 ] KKM [D 7,1 ] [D 8,2 ] 5 (2,1) 3 [E 9,3,1 ] [F 9,3 ] 6 D4 [C 5 ] 4 (3,1) 3 [E 9,4,1 ] 4 (3,1) 4 [F 9,4,1 ] 5 D3 [C 4 ] 3 (4,1) 3 [E 9,5,1 ] 3 (3,2) 4 [F 9,5,2 ] 4 D2 [C 3 ] 2 (5,1) 3 [E 9,6,1 ] 2 (3,3) 4 [F 9,6,3 ] 3 F1 [B 2 ] D1 [C 2 ] 1 (6,1) 3 [E 9,7,1 ] 1 (3,4) 4 [F 9,7,4 ] 1 (6,0,1) 4 [F 9,7,1,1 ] A D T,I1 +I 2,I 2 -forms : mixed-symmetry fields b (I 1,I 2 ) n -branes T + b + i I i = D 1 with T = 1 : transverse, b : spatial, I i : isometry directions THREE EXOTICA
45 Exotic branes Exotic branes ( ) J. de Boer and M. Shigemori, arxiv: and arxiv: THREE EXOTICA
46
47
48 embedding tensors (non)geometric fluxes exotic branes
49 Q ab c vs Θ M α : G. Dall Agata et al, arxiv: Θ M α vs b c n : E. Bergshoeff et al, arxiv: D N = 2 Q ab c vs Θ M α ( ) THREE EXOTICA
50 Flux Compactifications on SU(3) SU(3) generalized geometry vs Embedding Tensor Formalism in 4D N = 2 theory gauged supergravity Q ab c vs Θ M α embedding tensor formalism rigid special Kähler vs local special Kähler hyper-kähler cone vs quaternonic Kähler etc. THREE EXOTICA
51
52 Appendix
53 Calabi-Yau compactification in type IIA NS-NS ϕ(x, y) = φ(x) ( ) (χȷ g mn (x, y) = iv a (x) (ω a ) mn (y), g mn (x, y) = i z ȷ ) mpq Ω pq n (x) Ω 2 (y) B 2 (x, y) = B 2 (x) + b a (x)ω a (y) t a (x) b a (x) + iv a (x) R-R C 1 (x, y) = A 0 1(x) C 3 (x, y) = A a 1(x) ω a (y) + ξ I (x)α I (y) ξ I (x)β I (y) H (1,1) ω a a = 1,..., h (1,1) H (0) H (1,1) ω Λ = (1, ω a ) Λ = 0, 1,..., h (1,1) H (2,2) H (6) ω Λ = ( ω a, vol. vol. ) H (2,1) χ i i = 1,..., h (2,1) H (3) (α I, β I ) I = 0, 1,..., h (2,1) dω Λ dα I = 0 = d ω Λ = 0 = dβ I APPENDIX
54 4D N = 2 SUGRA from type IIA on Calabi-Yau 10D type IIA action S (10D) IIA = S NS + S R + S CS : S NS = 1 e 2ϕ{ 1 } R 1 + 4dϕ dϕ 2 2Ĥ3 Ĥ3 S R + S CS = 1 { F2 4 F 2 + ( F4 Ĉ1 F ) ( 3 F4 Ĉ1 F ) } B 2 F 4 F 4 4D N = 2 ungauged SUGRA: Neither gauge couplings, Nor scalar potential S (4D) = {1 2 R 1 G ab dta dt b h uv dq u dq v ImN ΛΣF Λ 2 F Σ ReN ΛΣF Λ 2 F Σ 2 } gravitational multiplet g µν, A 0 1 vector multiplet (VM) A a 1, t a, t b t a SKG V hypermultiplet (HM) z i, z ȷ, ξ i, ξj z i SKG H universal hypermultiplet (UHM) φ, a, ξ 0, ξ0 a B 2 (Hodge dual) HM = Special QG App.top {q u } 4n H + 4 = {z i, z ȷ } + {ξ i, ξ j } + {φ, a, ξ 0, ξ 0 } 2n H (SKG H ) 2n H 4 (UHM) = {z i, z ȷ } SKG H + {φ} + {a, ξ I, ξ J } Heisenberg APPENDIX
55 Intrinsic torsion classes of SU(3)-structure manifolds dj = 3 2 Im(W 1Ω) + W 4 J + W 3, dω = W 1 J J + W 2 J + W 5 Ω hermitian W 1 = W 2 = 0 balanced W 1 = W 2 = W 4 = 0 complex special hermitian W 1 = W 2 = W 4 = W 5 = 0 Kähler W 1 = W 2 = W 3 = W 4 = 0 Calabi-Yau W 1 = W 2 = W 3 = W 4 = W 5 = 0 conformally CY W 1 = W 2 = W 3 = 3W 4 + 2W 5 = 0 symplectic W 1 = W 3 = W 4 = 0 nearly Kähler W 2 = W 3 = W 4 = W 5 = 0 almost complex almost Kähler W 1 = W 3 = W 4 = W 5 = 0 quasi Kähler W 3 = W 4 = W 5 = 0 semi Kähler W 4 = W 5 = 0 half-flat ImW 1 = ImW 2 = W 4 = W 5 = 0 APPENDIX
56 Geometric flux compactification in type IIA 10D type IIA action S (10D) S NS = 1 2 IIA = S NS + S R = S NS + S R + S CS : (democratic form) e 2ϕ{ 1 } R 1 + 4dϕ dϕ 2Ĥ3 Ĥ3, SR = 1 8 [ F F] 10 with constraint F = λ( F) and EoM (Bianchi) (d + Ĥ ) F = 0 (d Ĥ ) F = 0 non-cy with SU(3)-structure with m Λ R = 0 non-cy with SU(3)-structure with mλ R = 0 4D N = 2 abelian gauged SUGRA (with ξ I (ξ I, ξ I ) T ): S (4D) = d 4 x g [ 1 2 R ImN ΛΣF Λ µνf Σµν ϵµνρσ 8 g ReN ΛΣF Λ µνf Σ ρσ g ab µ t a µ t b g iȷ µ z i µ z ȷ µ φ µ φ + e2φ 2 (M H) IJ D µ ξ I D µ ξ J e2φ 4 ( Dµ a ξ I (C H ) IJ D µ ξ J) 2 V (t, t, q) ] (e Λ I, e ΛI ) : geometric flux charges & e RΛ : RR-flux charges (with constraints e Λ I e ΣI e ΛI e Σ I = 0) t a SKG V and z i SKG H HM are ungauged (in general) non-cy data D µ ξ I = µ ξ I e Λ I A Λ µ & D µ ξi = µ ξi e ΛI A Λ µ D µ a = µ a (2e RΛ ξ I e ΛI + ξ I e Λ I )A Λ µ V (t, t, q): scalar potential D. Cassani, arxiv: APPENDIX
57 Generic form of 4D N = 2 gauged SUGRA with B-field Non-vanishing m Λ R dualizes the axion field a in standard SUGRA to B-field. 4D gauged action is different from the standard one: S (4D) = [ 1 2 R( 1) ImN ΛΣF Λ 2 F Σ ReN ΛΣF Λ 2 F Σ 2 g ab dt a dt b g iȷ dz i dz ȷ dφ dφ e 4φ 4 H 3 H 3 e2φ 2 (M H) IJ Dξ I Dξ J V ( 1) + 1 [ξ 2 db I (C H ) IJ Dξ J + ( 2e RΛ ξ I e ΛI + ξ I I e ) ] Λ A Λ 1 1 ] 2 mλ Re RΛ B 2 B 2 Constraints among flux charges: e Λ I e ΣI e ΛI e Σ I = 0, m Λ R e Λ I = 0 = m Λ R e ΛI APPENDIX
58 Scalar potential Scalar potential from (non)geometric flux compactifications: V = g 2[ 4h uv k u k v + 3 x=1 V NS = g ab D a P + D b P + + g iȷ D i P + D ȷ P + 2 P + 2 ( g ab D a P x D b P x 3 P x 2)] =... V NS + V R (abelian: k a Λ = 0) = 2 g 2 e 2φ[ Π T Q H T M V Q ΠH + Π T V Q M H Q T Π V + 4Π T H C T H Q T( Π V Π T V + Π V Π T ) ] V Q CH Π H V R = g ab D a P 3 D b P 3 + P 3 2 = 1 2 g2 e 4φ( e RΛ e ΛI ξ I + e Λ I ξi ) (ImN ) 1 ΛΣ ( e RΣ e ΣI ξ I + e Σ I ξi ) Π V = e KV/2 (X Λ, F Λ ) T t a = X a /X 0 a = 1,..., n V SKG V of vector-moduli ( 0 1 C V,H = 1 0 ) P + P 1 + ip 2 = 2e φ Π T V Q C H Π H P P 1 ip 2 = 2e φ Π T V Q C H Π H ; Q = P 3 m ΛI m Λ I = e 2φ Π T V C V (c R + Qξ) ( ) I eλ e ΛI, Q = C T H Q C V c R = Π H = e KH/2 (Z I, G I ) T z i = Z i /Z 0 i = 1,..., n H SKG H of hyper-moduli ( ) m Λ R e RΛ Cassani et.al., arxiv: , arxiv: APPENDIX
SUSY DWs
@ 2013 1 25 Supersymmetric Domain Walls Eric A. Bergshoeff, Axel Kleinschmidt, and Fabio Riccioni Phys. Rev. D86 (2012) 085043 (arxiv:1206.5697) ( ) Contents 1 2 SUSY Domain Walls Wess-Zumino Embedding
Flux compactifications, N=2 gauged supergravities and black holes
: 2011 11 2 Flux Compactifications, N = 2 Gauged Supergravities and Black Holes based on arxiv:1108.1113 [hep-th] Introduction 4 10 Tetsuji KIMURA : Flux Compactifications, N=2 Gauged SUGRA and Black Holes
(2012 5 07 ) Flux Compactifications, and Gauged Supergravities ( ) ( ) Gauged supergravity : ( ) ( R ) Nucl. Phys. B258 (1985) 46 10D M 6 4D N = 1 10D = 4D Minkowski + 6D internal space M 6 : ds 2 10D
YITP50.dvi
1 70 80 90 50 2 3 3 84 first revolution 4 94 second revolution 5 6 2 1: 1 3 consistent 1-loop Feynman 1-loop Feynman loop loop loop Feynman 2 3 2: 1-loop Feynman loop 3 cycle 4 = 3: 4: 4 cycle loop Feynman
CKY CKY CKY 4 Kerr CKY
( ) 1. (I) Hidden Symmetry and Exact Solutions in Einstein Gravity Houri-Y.Y: Progress Supplement (2011) (II) Generalized Hidden Symmetries and Kerr-Sen Black Hole Houri-Kubiznak-Warnick-Y.Y: JHEP (2010)
QCD 1 QCD GeV 2014 QCD 2015 QCD SU(3) QCD A µ g µν QCD 1
QCD 1 QCD GeV 2014 QCD 2015 QCD SU(3) QCD A µ g µν QCD 1 (vierbein) QCD QCD 1 1: QCD QCD Γ ρ µν A µ R σ µνρ F µν g µν A µ Lagrangian gr TrFµν F µν No. Yes. Yes. No. No! Yes! [1] Nash & Sen [2] Riemann
『共形場理論』
T (z) SL(2, C) T (z) SU(2) S 1 /Z 2 SU(2) (ŜU(2) k ŜU(2) 1)/ŜU(2) k+1 ŜU(2)/Û(1) G H N =1 N =1 N =1 N =1 N =2 N =2 N =2 N =2 ĉ>1 N =2 N =2 N =4 N =4 1 2 2 z=x 1 +ix 2 z f(z) f(z) 1 1 4 4 N =4 1 = = 1.3
1 M = (M, g) m Riemann N = (N, h) n Riemann M N C f : M N f df : T M T N M T M f N T N M f 1 T N T M f 1 T N C X, Y Γ(T M) M C T M f 1 T N M Levi-Civi
1 Surveys in Geometry 1980 2 6, 7 Harmonic Map Plateau Eells-Sampson [5] Siu [19, 20] Kähler 6 Reports on Global Analysis [15] Sacks- Uhlenbeck [18] Siu-Yau [21] Frankel Siu Yau Frankel [13] 1 Surveys
Einstein ( ) YITP
Einstein ( ) 2013 8 21 YITP 0. massivegravity Massive spin 2 field theory Fierz-Pauli (FP ) Kinetic term L (2) EH = 1 2 [ λh µν λ h µν λ h λ h 2 µ h µλ ν h νλ + 2 µ h µλ λ h], (1) Mass term FP L mass =
TOP URL 1
TOP URL http://amonphys.web.fc2.com/ 1 6 3 6.1................................ 3 6.2.............................. 4 6.3................................ 5 6.4.......................... 6 6.5......................
1.1 foliation M foliation M 0 t Σ t M M = t R Σ t (12) Σ t t Σ t x i Σ t A(t, x i ) Σ t n µ Σ t+ t B(t + t, x i ) AB () tα tαn µ Σ t+ t C(t + t,
1 Gourgoulhon BSSN BSSN ϕ = 1 6 ( D i β i αk) (1) γ ij = 2αĀij 2 3 D k β k γ ij (2) K = e 4ϕ ( Di Di α + 2 D i ϕ D i α ) + α ] [4π(E + S) + ĀijĀij + K2 3 (3) Ā ij = 2 3Āij D k β k 2αĀikĀk j + αāijk +e
Seiberg Witten 1994 N = 2 SU(2) Yang-Mills 1 1 3 2 5 2.1..................... 5 2.2.............. 8 2.3................................. 9 3 N = 2 Yang-Mills 11 3.1............................... 11 3.2
tomocci ,. :,,,, Lie,,,, Einstein, Newton. 1 M n C. s, M p. M f, p d ds f = dxµ p ds µ f p, X p = X µ µ p = dxµ ds µ p. µ, X µ.,. p,. T M p.
tomocci 18 7 5...,. :,,,, Lie,,,, Einstein, Newton. 1 M n C. s, M p. M f, p d ds f = dxµ p ds µ f p, X p = X µ µ p = dxµ ds µ p. µ, X µ.,. p,. T M p. M F (M), X(F (M)).. T M p e i = e µ i µ. a a = a i
Hanbury-Brown Twiss (ver. 2.0) van Cittert - Zernike mutual coherence
Hanbury-Brown Twiss (ver. 2.) 25 4 4 1 2 2 2 2.1 van Cittert - Zernike..................................... 2 2.2 mutual coherence................................. 4 3 Hanbury-Brown Twiss ( ) 5 3.1............................................
TOP URL 1
TOP URL http://amonphys.web.fc.com/ 1 19 3 19.1................... 3 19.............................. 4 19.3............................... 6 19.4.............................. 8 19.5.............................
[1] convention Minkovski i Polchinski [2] 1 Clifford Spin 1 2 Euclid Clifford 2 3 Euclid Spin 6 4 Euclid Pin Clifford Spin 10 A 12 B 17 1 Cliffo
![[1] convention Minkovski i Polchinski [2] 1 Clifford Spin 1 2 Euclid Clifford 2 3 Euclid Spin 6 4 Euclid Pin Clifford Spin 10 A 12 B 17 1 Cliffo](/thumbs/101/149329436.jpg "[1] convention Minkovski i Polchinski [2] 1 Clifford Spin 1 2 Euclid Clifford 2 3 Euclid Spin 6 4 Euclid Pin Clifford Spin 10 A 12 B 17 1 Cliffo")
[1] convention Minkovski i Polchinski [2] 1 Clifford Spin 1 2 Euclid Clifford 2 3 Euclid Spin 6 4 Euclid Pin + 8 5 Clifford Spin 10 A 12 B 17 1 Clifford Spin D Euclid Clifford Γ µ, µ = 1,, D {Γ µ, Γ ν
1 (Berry,1975) 2-6 p (S πr 2 )p πr 2 p 2πRγ p p = 2γ R (2.5).1-1 : : : : ( ).2 α, β α, β () X S = X X α X β (.1) 1 2
2005 9/8-11 2 2.2 ( 2-5) γ ( ) γ cos θ 2πr πρhr 2 g h = 2γ cos θ ρgr (2.1) γ = ρgrh (2.2) 2 cos θ θ cos θ = 1 (2.2) γ = 1 ρgrh (2.) 2 2. p p ρgh p ( ) p p = p ρgh (2.) h p p = 2γ r 1 1 (Berry,1975) 2-6
TOP URL 1
TOP URL http://amonphys.web.fc.com/ 3.............................. 3.............................. 4.3 4................... 5.4........................ 6.5........................ 8.6...........................7
5 Calabi-Yau web
T- 24 6 11 NS5- T- 1 T- 2 1.1............................................ 2 1.2 Buscher............................................ 4 1.3 T-...................................... 6 1.4 D- T-...............................
TOP URL 1
TOP URL http://amonphys.web.fc2.com/ 1 30 3 30.1.............. 3 30.2........................... 4 30.3...................... 5 30.4........................ 6 30.5.................................. 8 30.6...............................
.2 ρ dv dt = ρk grad p + 3 η grad (divv) + η 2 v.3 divh = 0, rote + c H t = 0 dive = ρ, H = 0, E = ρ, roth c E t = c ρv E + H c t = 0 H c E t = c ρv T
NHK 204 2 0 203 2 24 ( ) 7 00 7 50 203 2 25 ( ) 7 00 7 50 203 2 26 ( ) 7 00 7 50 203 2 27 ( ) 7 00 7 50 I. ( ν R n 2 ) m 2 n m, R = e 2 8πε 0 hca B =.09737 0 7 m ( ν = ) λ a B = 4πε 0ħ 2 m e e 2 = 5.2977
K E N Z U 2012 7 16 HP M. 1 1 4 1.1 3.......................... 4 1.2................................... 4 1.2.1..................................... 4 1.2.2.................................... 5................................
July 28, H H 0 H int = H H 0 H int = H int (x)d 3 x Schrödinger Picture Ψ(t) S =e iht Ψ H O S Heisenberg Picture Ψ H O H (t) =e iht O S e i
July 8, 4. H H H int H H H int H int (x)d 3 x Schrödinger Picture Ψ(t) S e iht Ψ H O S Heisenberg Picture Ψ H O H (t) e iht O S e iht Interaction Picture Ψ(t) D e iht Ψ(t) S O D (t) e iht O S e ih t (Dirac
Z: Q: R: C: sin 6 5 ζ a, b
Z: Q: R: C: 3 3 7 4 sin 6 5 ζ 9 6 6............................... 6............................... 6.3......................... 4 7 6 8 8 9 3 33 a, b a bc c b a a b 5 3 5 3 5 5 3 a a a a p > p p p, 3,
Part () () Γ Part ,
Contents a 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 7 7. 8.. 8.. 8.3. 8 Part. 9. 9.. 9.. 3. 3.. 3.. 3 4. 5 4.. 5 4.. 9 4.3. 3 Part. 6 5. () 6 5.. () 7 5.. 9 5.3. Γ 3 6. 3 6.. 3 6.. 3 6.3. 33 Part 3. 34 7. 34 7.. 34 7.. 34 8. 35
A 2 3. m S m = {x R m+1 x = 1} U + k = {x S m x k > 0}, U k = {x S m x k < 0}, ϕ ± k (x) = (x 0,..., ˆx k,... x m ) 1. {(U ± k, ϕ± k ) 0 k m} S m 1.2.
A A 1 A 5 A 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 1.1 1.1 (). Hausdorff M R m M M {U α } U α R m E α ϕ α : U α E α U α U β = ϕ α (ϕ β ϕβ (U α U β )) 1 : ϕ β (U α U β ) ϕ α (U α U β ) C M a m dim M a U α ϕ α {x i, 1 i m} {U,
' , 24 :,,,,, ( ) Cech Index theorem 22 5 Stability 44 6 compact 49 7 Donaldson 58 8 Symplectic structure 63 9 Wall crossing 66 1
1998 1998 7 20 26, 44. 400,,., (KEK), ( ) ( )..,.,,,. 1998 1 '98 7 23, 24 :,,,,, ( ) 1 3 2 Cech 6 3 13 4 Index theorem 22 5 Stability 44 6 compact 49 7 Donaldson 58 8 Symplectic structure 63 9 Wall crossing
(τ τ ) τ, σ ( ) w = τ iσ, w = τ + iσ (w ) w, w ( ) τ, σ τ = (w + w), σ = i (w w) w, w w = τ w τ + σ w σ = τ + i σ w = τ w τ + σ w σ = τ i σ g ab w, w
S = 4π dτ dσ gg ij i X µ j X ν η µν η µν g ij g ij = g ij = ( 0 0 ) τ, σ (+, +) τ τ = iτ ds ds = dτ + dσ ds = dτ + dσ δ ij ( ) a =, a = τ b = σ g ij δ ab g g ( +, +,... ) S = 4π S = 4π ( i) = i 4π dτ dσ
0. Intro ( K CohFT etc CohFT 5.IKKT 6.
E-mail: sako@math.keio.ac.jp 0. Intro ( K 1. 2. CohFT etc 3. 4. CohFT 5.IKKT 6. 1 µ, ν : d (x 0,x 1,,x d 1 ) t = x 0 ( t τ ) x i i, j, :, α, β, SO(D) ( x µ g µν x µ µ g µν x ν (1) g µν g µν vector x µ,y
(2) Fisher α (α) α Fisher α ( α) 0 Levi Civita (1) ( 1) e m (e) (m) ([1], [2], [13]) Poincaré e m Poincaré e m Kähler-like 2 Kähler-like
![(2) Fisher α (α) α Fisher α ( α) 0 Levi Civita (1) ( 1) e m (e) (m) ([1], [2], [13]) Poincaré e m Poincaré e m Kähler-like 2 Kähler-like](/thumbs/97/133596579.jpg "(2) Fisher α (α) α Fisher α ( α) 0 Levi Civita (1) ( 1) e m (e) (m) ([1], [2], [13]) Poincaré e m Poincaré e m Kähler-like 2 Kähler-like")
() 10 9 30 1 Fisher α (α) α Fisher α ( α) 0 Levi Civita (1) ( 1) e m (e) (m) ([1], [], [13]) Poincaré e m Poincaré e m Kähler-like Kähler-like Kähler M g M X, Y, Z (.1) Xg(Y, Z) = g( X Y, Z) + g(y, XZ)
Dirac 38 5 Dirac 4 4 γ µ p µ p µ + m 2 = ( p µ γ µ + m)(p ν γ ν + m) (5.1) γ = p µ p ν γ µ γ ν p µ γ µ m + mp ν γ ν + m 2 = 1 2 p µp ν {γ µ, γ ν } + m
Dirac 38 5 Dirac 4 4 γ µ p µ p µ + m 2 p µ γ µ + mp ν γ ν + m 5.1 γ p µ p ν γ µ γ ν p µ γ µ m + mp ν γ ν + m 2 1 2 p µp ν {γ µ, γ ν } + m 2 5.2 p m p p µ γ µ {, } 10 γ {γ µ, γ ν } 2η µν 5.3 p µ γ µ + mp
arxiv: v1(astro-ph.co)
arxiv:1311.0281v1(astro-ph.co) R µν 1 2 Rg µν + Λg µν = 8πG c 4 T µν Λ f(r) R f(r) Galileon φ(t) Massive Gravity etc... Action S = d 4 x g (L GG + L m ) L GG = K(φ,X) G 3 (φ,x)φ + G 4 (φ,x)r + G 4X (φ)
1 1, 2016 D B. 1.1,.,,. (1). (2). (3) Milnor., (1) (2)., (3). 1.2,.,, ( )..,.,,. 1.3, webpage,.,,.
1 1, 2016 D B. 1.1,.,,. (1). (2). (3) Milnor., (1) (2)., (3). 1.2,.,, ( )..,.,,. 1.3, 2015. webpage,.,,. 2 1 (1),, ( ). (2),,. (3),.,, : Hashinaga, T., Tamaru, H.: Three-dimensional solvsolitons and the
Introduction SFT Tachyon condensation in SFT SFT ( ) at 1 / 38
( ) 2011 5 14 at 1 / 38 Introduction? = String Field Theory = SFT 2 / 38 String Field : ϕ(x, t) x ϕ x / ( ) X ( σ) (string field): Φ[X(σ), t] X(σ) Φ (Φ X(σ) ) X(σ) & / 3 / 38 SFT with Lorentz & Gauge Invariance
20 9 19 1 3 11 1 3 111 3 112 1 4 12 6 121 6 122 7 13 7 131 8 132 10 133 10 134 12 14 13 141 13 142 13 143 15 144 16 145 17 15 19 151 1 19 152 20 2 21 21 21 211 21 212 1 23 213 1 23 214 25 215 31 22 33
D-brane K 1, 2 ( ) 1 K D-brane K K D-brane Witten [1] D-brane K K K K D-brane D-brane K RR BPS D-brane
![D-brane K 1, 2 ( ) 1 K D-brane K K D-brane Witten [1] D-brane K K K K D-brane D-brane K RR BPS D-brane](/thumbs/94/118614691.jpg "D-brane K 1, 2 ( ) 1 K D-brane K K D-brane Witten [1] D-brane K K K K D-brane D-brane K RR BPS D-brane")
D-brane K 1, 2 E-mail: sugimoto@yukawa.kyoto-u.ac.jp (2004 12 16 ) 1 K D-brane K K D-brane Witten [1] D-brane K K K K D-brane D-brane K RR BPS D-brane D-brane RR D-brane K D-brane K D-brane K K [2, 3]
中央大学セミナー.ppt
String Gas Cosmology References Brandenberger & Vafa, Superstrings in the early universe, Nucl.Phys.B316(1988) 391. Tseytlin & Vafa, Elements of string cosmology, Nucl.Phys.B372 (1992) 443. Brandenberger,
1 (Contents) (1) Beginning of the Universe, Dark Energy and Dark Matter Noboru NAKANISHI 2 2. Problem of Heat Exchanger (1) Kenji
8 4 2018 6 2018 6 7 1 (Contents) 1. 2 2. (1) 22 3. 31 1. Beginning of the Universe, Dark Energy and Dark Matter Noboru NAKANISHI 2 2. Problem of Heat Exchanger (1) Kenji SETO 22 3. Editorial Comments Tadashi
0. I II I II (1) linear type: GL( ), Sp( ), O( ), (2) loop type: loop current Kac-Moody affine, hyperbolic (3) diffeo t
e-mail: koyama@math.keio.ac.jp 0. I II I II (1) linear type: GL( ), Sp( ), O( ), (2) loop type: loop current Kac-Moody affine, hyperbolic (3) diffeo type: diffeo universal Teichmuller modular I. I-. Weyl
ADM-Hamiltonian Cheeger-Gromov 3. Penrose
ADM-Hamiltonian 1. 2. Cheeger-Gromov 3. Penrose 0. ADM-Hamiltonian (M 4, h) Einstein-Hilbert M 4 R h hdx L h = R h h δl h = 0 (Ric h ) αβ 1 2 R hg αβ = 0 (Σ 3, g ij ) (M 4, h ij ) g ij, k ij Σ π ij = g(k
( ; ) C. H. Scholz, The Mechanics of Earthquakes and Faulting : - ( ) σ = σ t sin 2π(r a) λ dσ d(r a) =
1 9 8 1 1 1 ; 1 11 16 C. H. Scholz, The Mechanics of Earthquakes and Faulting 1. 1.1 1.1.1 : - σ = σ t sin πr a λ dσ dr a = E a = π λ σ πr a t cos λ 1 r a/λ 1 cos 1 E: σ t = Eλ πa a λ E/π γ : λ/ 3 γ =
医系の統計入門第 2 版 サンプルページ この本の定価 判型などは, 以下の URL からご覧いただけます. このサンプルページの内容は, 第 2 版 1 刷発行時のものです.
医系の統計入門第 2 版 サンプルページ この本の定価 判型などは, 以下の URL からご覧いただけます. http://www.morikita.co.jp/books/mid/009192 このサンプルページの内容は, 第 2 版 1 刷発行時のものです. i 2 t 1. 2. 3 2 3. 6 4. 7 5. n 2 ν 6. 2 7. 2003 ii 2 2013 10 iii 1987
Kaluza-Klein(KK) SO(11) KK 1 2 1
Maskawa Institute, Kyoto Sangyo University Naoki Yamatsu 2016 4 12 ( ) @ Kaluza-Klein(KK) SO(11) KK 1 2 1 1. 2. 3. 4. 2 1. 標準理論 物質場 ( フェルミオン ) スカラー ゲージ場 クォーク ヒッグス u d s b ν c レプトン ν t ν e μ τ e μ τ e h
λ n numbering Num(λ) Young numbering T i j T ij Young T (content) cont T (row word) word T µ n S n µ C(µ) 0.2. Young λ, µ n Kostka K µλ K µλ def = #{T
0 2 8 8 6 3 0 0 Young Young [F] 0.. Young λ n λ n λ = (λ,, λ l ) λ λ 2 λ l λ = ( m, 2 m 2, ) λ = n, l(λ) = l {λ n n 0} P λ = (λ, ), µ = (µ, ) n λ µ k k k λ i µ i λ µ λ = µ k i= i= i < k λ i = µ i λ k >
第1章 微分方程式と近似解法
April 12, 2018 1 / 52 1.1 ( ) 2 / 52 1.2 1.1 1.1: 3 / 52 1.3 Poisson Poisson Poisson 1 d {2, 3} 4 / 52 1 1.3.1 1 u,b b(t,x) u(t,x) x=0 1.1: 1 a x=l 1.1 1 (0, t T ) (0, l) 1 a b : (0, t T ) (0, l) R, u
: 2005 ( ρ t +dv j =0 r m m r = e E( r +e r B( r T 208 T = d E j 207 ρ t = = = e t δ( r r (t e r r δ( r r (t e r ( r δ( r r (t dv j =
72 Maxwell. Maxwell e r ( =,,N Maxwell rot E + B t = 0 rot H D t = j dv D = ρ dv B = 0 D = ɛ 0 E H = μ 0 B ρ( r = j( r = N e δ( r r = N e r δ( r r = : 2005 ( 2006.8.22 73 207 ρ t +dv j =0 r m m r = e E(
Euler, Yang-Mills Clebsch variable Helicity ( Tosiaki Kori ) School of Sciences and Technology, Waseda Uiversity (i) Yang-Mills 3 A T (T A) Poisson Ha
Euler, Yang-ills Clebsch variable Helicity Tosiaki Kori ) School of Sciences and Technology, Waseda Uiversity i) Yang-ills 3 A T T A) Poisson Hamilton ii) Clebsch parametrization iii) Y- Y-iv) Euler,v)
i Version 1.1, (2012/02/22 24),.,..,.,,. R-space,, ( R- space),, Kahler (Kähler C-space)., R-space,., R-space, Hermite,.
R-space ( ) Version 1.1 (2012/02/29) i Version 1.1, (2012/02/22 24),.,..,.,,. R-space,, ( R- space),, Kahler (Kähler C-space)., R-space,., R-space, Hermite,. ii 1 Lie 1 1.1 Killing................................
Gauss Gauss ɛ 0 E ds = Q (1) xy σ (x, y, z) (2) a ρ(x, y, z) = x 2 + y 2 (r, θ, φ) (1) xy A Gauss ɛ 0 E ds = ɛ 0 EA Q = ρa ɛ 0 EA = ρea E = (ρ/ɛ 0 )e
7 -a 7 -a February 4, 2007 1. 2. 3. 4. 1. 2. 3. 1 Gauss Gauss ɛ 0 E ds = Q (1) xy σ (x, y, z) (2) a ρ(x, y, z) = x 2 + y 2 (r, θ, φ) (1) xy A Gauss ɛ 0 E ds = ɛ 0 EA Q = ρa ɛ 0 EA = ρea E = (ρ/ɛ 0 )e z
量子力学 問題
3 : 203 : 0. H = 0 0 2 6 0 () = 6, 2 = 2, 3 = 3 3 H 6 2 3 ϵ,2,3 (2) ψ = (, 2, 3 ) ψ Hψ H (3) P i = i i P P 2 = P 2 P 3 = P 3 P = O, P 2 i = P i (4) P + P 2 + P 3 = E 3 (5) i ϵ ip i H 0 0 (6) R = 0 0 [H,
D = [a, b] [c, d] D ij P ij (ξ ij, η ij ) f S(f,, {P ij }) S(f,, {P ij }) = = k m i=1 j=1 m n f(ξ ij, η ij )(x i x i 1 )(y j y j 1 ) = i=1 j
![D = [a, b] [c, d] D ij P ij (ξ ij, η ij ) f S(f,, {P ij }) S(f,, {P ij }) = = k m i=1 j=1 m n f(ξ ij, η ij )(x i x i 1 )(y j y j 1 ) = i=1 j](/thumbs/103/158001152.jpg "D = [a, b] [c, d] D ij P ij (ξ ij, η ij ) f S(f,, {P ij }) S(f,, {P ij }) = = k m i=1 j=1 m n f(ξ ij, η ij )(x i x i 1 )(y j y j 1 ) = i=1 j")
6 6.. [, b] [, d] ij P ij ξ ij, η ij f Sf,, {P ij } Sf,, {P ij } k m i j m fξ ij, η ij i i j j i j i m i j k i i j j m i i j j k i i j j kb d {P ij } lim Sf,, {P ij} kb d f, k [, b] [, d] f, d kb d 6..
O x y z O ( O ) O (O ) 3 x y z O O x v t = t = 0 ( 1 ) O t = 0 c t r = ct P (x, y, z) r 2 = x 2 + y 2 + z 2 (t, x, y, z) (ct) 2 x 2 y 2 z 2 = 0
9 O y O ( O ) O (O ) 3 y O O v t = t = 0 ( ) O t = 0 t r = t P (, y, ) r = + y + (t,, y, ) (t) y = 0 () ( )O O t (t ) y = 0 () (t) y = (t ) y = 0 (3) O O v O O v O O O y y O O v P(, y,, t) t (, y,, t )
II A A441 : October 02, 2014 Version : Kawahira, Tomoki TA (Kondo, Hirotaka )
II 214-1 : October 2, 214 Version : 1.1 Kawahira, Tomoki TA (Kondo, Hirotaka ) http://www.math.nagoya-u.ac.jp/~kawahira/courses/14w-biseki.html pdf 1 2 1 9 1 16 1 23 1 3 11 6 11 13 11 2 11 27 12 4 12 11
susy.dvi
1 Chapter 1 Why supper symmetry? 2 Chapter 2 Representaions of the supersymmetry algebra SUSY Q a d 3 xj 0 α J x µjµ = 0 µ SUSY ( {Q A α,q βb } = 2σ µ α β P µδ A B (2.1 {Q A α,q βb } = {Q αa,q βb } = 0
Gmech08.dvi
145 13 13.1 13.1.1 0 m mg S 13.1 F 13.1 F /m S F F 13.1 F mg S F F mg 13.1: m d2 r 2 = F + F = 0 (13.1) 146 13 F = F (13.2) S S S S S P r S P r r = r 0 + r (13.3) r 0 S S m d2 r 2 = F (13.4) (13.3) d 2
d ϕ i) t d )t0 d ϕi) ϕ i) t x j t d ) ϕ t0 t α dx j d ) ϕ i) t dx t0 j x j d ϕ i) ) t x j dx t0 j f i x j ξ j dx i + ξ i x j dx j f i ξ i x j dx j d )
23 M R M ϕ : R M M ϕt, x) ϕ t x) ϕ s ϕ t ϕ s+t, ϕ 0 id M M ϕ t M ξ ξ ϕ t d ϕ tx) ξϕ t x)) U, x 1,...,x n )) ϕ t x) ϕ 1) t x),...,ϕ n) t x)), ξx) ξ i x) d ϕi) t x) ξ i ϕ t x)) M f ϕ t f)x) f ϕ t )x) fϕ
6 2 T γ T B (6.4) (6.1) [( d nm + 3 ] 2 nt B )a 3 + nt B da 3 = 0 (6.9) na 3 = T B V 3/2 = T B V γ 1 = const. or T B a 2 = const. (6.10) H 2 = 8π kc2
![6 2 T γ T B (6.4) (6.1) [( d nm + 3 ] 2 nt B )a 3 + nt B da 3 = 0 (6.9) na 3 = T B V 3/2 = T B V γ 1 = const. or T B a 2 = const. (6.10) H 2 = 8π kc2](/thumbs/92/109118076.jpg "6 2 T γ T B (6.4) (6.1) [( d nm + 3 ] 2 nt B )a 3 + nt B da 3 = 0 (6.9) na 3 = T B V 3/2 = T B V γ 1 = const. or T B a 2 = const. (6.10) H 2 = 8π kc2")
1 6 6.1 (??) (P = ρ rad /3) ρ rad T 4 d(ρv ) + PdV = 0 (6.1) dρ rad ρ rad + 4 da a = 0 (6.2) dt T + da a = 0 T 1 a (6.3) ( ) n ρ m = n (m + 12 ) m v2 = n (m + 32 ) T, P = nt (6.4) (6.1) d [(nm + 32 ] )a
W u = u(x, t) u tt = a 2 u xx, a > 0 (1) D := {(x, t) : 0 x l, t 0} u (0, t) = 0, u (l, t) = 0, t 0 (2)
3 215 4 27 1 1 u u(x, t) u tt a 2 u xx, a > (1) D : {(x, t) : x, t } u (, t), u (, t), t (2) u(x, ) f(x), u(x, ) t 2, x (3) u(x, t) X(x)T (t) u (1) 1 T (t) a 2 T (t) X (x) X(x) α (2) T (t) αa 2 T (t) (4)
4. ϵ(ν, T ) = c 4 u(ν, T ) ϵ(ν, T ) T ν π4 Planck dx = 0 e x 1 15 U(T ) x 3 U(T ) = σt 4 Stefan-Boltzmann σ 2π5 k 4 15c 2 h 3 = W m 2 K 4 5.
A 1. Boltzmann Planck u(ν, T )dν = 8πh ν 3 c 3 kt 1 dν h 6.63 10 34 J s Planck k 1.38 10 23 J K 1 Boltzmann u(ν, T ) T ν e hν c = 3 10 8 m s 1 2. Planck λ = c/ν Rayleigh-Jeans u(ν, T )dν = 8πν2 kt dν c
A bound of the number of reduced Arakelov divisors of a number field (joint work with Ryusuke Yoshimitsu) Takao Watanabe Department of Mathematics Osa
A bound of the number of reduced Arakelov divisors of a number field (joint work with Ryusuke Yoshimitsu) Takao Watanabe Department of Mathematics Osaka University , Schoof Algorithmic Number Theory, MSRI
/ Christopher Essex Radiation and the Violation of Bilinearity in the Thermodynamics of Irreversible Processes, Planet.Space Sci.32 (1984) 1035 Radiat
/ Christopher Essex Radiation and the Violation of Bilinearity in the Thermodynamics of Irreversible Processes, Planet.Space Sci.32 (1984) 1035 Radiation and the Continuing Failure of the Bilinear Formalism,
SO(3) 7 = = 1 ( r ) + 1 r r r r ( l ) (5.17) l = 1 ( sin θ ) + sin θ θ θ ϕ (5.18) χ(r)ψ(θ, ϕ) l ψ = αψ (5.19) l 1 = i(sin ϕ θ l = i( cos ϕ θ l 3 = i ϕ
SO(3) 71 5.7 5.7.1 1 ħ L k l k l k = iϵ kij x i j (5.117) l k SO(3) l z l ± = l 1 ± il = i(y z z y ) ± (z x x z ) = ( x iy) z ± z( x ± i y ) = X ± z ± z (5.118) l z = i(x y y x ) = 1 [(x + iy)( x i y )
meiji_resume_1.PDF
β β β (q 1,q,..., q n ; p 1, p,..., p n ) H(q 1,q,..., q n ; p 1, p,..., p n ) Hψ = εψ ε k = k +1/ ε k = k(k 1) (x, y, z; p x, p y, p z ) (r; p r ), (θ; p θ ), (ϕ; p ϕ ) ε k = 1/ k p i dq i E total = E
スケーリング理論とはなにか? - --尺度を変えて見えること--
? URL: http://maildbs.c.u-tokyo.ac.jp/ fukushima mailto:hukusima@phys.c.u-tokyo.ac.jp DEX-SMI @ 2006 12 17 ( ) What is scaling theory? DEX-SMI 1 / 40 Outline Outline 1 2 3 4 ( ) What is scaling theory?
Chern-Simons Jones 3 Chern-Simons 1 - Chern-Simons - Jones J(K; q) [1] Jones q 1 J (K + ; q) qj (K ; q) = (q 1/2 q
![Chern-Simons Jones 3 Chern-Simons 1 - Chern-Simons - Jones J(K; q) [1] Jones q 1 J (K + ; q) qj (K ; q) = (q 1/2 q](/thumbs/94/118766307.jpg "Chern-Simons Jones 3 Chern-Simons 1 - Chern-Simons - Jones J(K; q) [1] Jones q 1 J (K + ; q) qj (K ; q) = (q 1/2 q")
Chern-Simons E-mail: fuji@th.phys.nagoya-u.ac.jp Jones 3 Chern-Simons - Chern-Simons - Jones J(K; q) []Jones q J (K + ; q) qj (K ; q) = (q /2 q /2 )J (K 0 ; q), () J( ; q) =. (2) K Figure : K +, K, K 0
50 2 I SI MKSA r q r q F F = 1 qq 4πε 0 r r 2 r r r r (2.2 ε 0 = 1 c 2 µ 0 c = m/s q 2.1 r q' F r = 0 µ 0 = 4π 10 7 N/A 2 k = 1/(4πε 0 qq
49 2 I II 2.1 3 e e = 1.602 10 19 A s (2.1 50 2 I SI MKSA 2.1.1 r q r q F F = 1 qq 4πε 0 r r 2 r r r r (2.2 ε 0 = 1 c 2 µ 0 c = 3 10 8 m/s q 2.1 r q' F r = 0 µ 0 = 4π 10 7 N/A 2 k = 1/(4πε 0 qq F = k r
( )
7..-8..8.......................................................................... 4.................................... 3...................................... 3..3.................................. 4.3....................................
微分積分 サンプルページ この本の定価 判型などは, 以下の URL からご覧いただけます. このサンプルページの内容は, 初版 1 刷発行時のものです.
微分積分 サンプルページ この本の定価 判型などは, 以下の URL からご覧いただけます. ttp://www.morikita.co.jp/books/mid/00571 このサンプルページの内容は, 初版 1 刷発行時のものです. i ii 014 10 iii [note] 1 3 iv 4 5 3 6 4 x 0 sin x x 1 5 6 z = f(x, y) 1 y = f(x)
25 7 18 1 1 1.1 v.s............................. 1 1.1.1.................................. 1 1.1.2................................. 1 1.1.3.................................. 3 1.2................... 3
[Ver. 0.2] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1 1.1 1 1.2 1. (elasticity) 2. (plasticity) 3. (strength) 4. 5. (toughness) 6. 1 1.2 1. (elasticity) } 1 1.2 2. (plasticity), 1 1.2 3. (strength) a < b F
‚åŁÎ“·„´Šš‡ðŠp‡¢‡½‹âfi`fiI…A…‰…S…−…Y…•‡ÌMarkovŸA“½fiI›ð’Í
Markov 2009 10 2 Markov 2009 10 2 1 / 25 1 (GA) 2 GA 3 4 Markov 2009 10 2 2 / 25 (GA) (GA) L ( 1) I := {0, 1} L f : I (0, ) M( 2) S := I M GA (GA) f (i) i I Markov 2009 10 2 3 / 25 (GA) ρ(i, j), i, j I
講義ノート 物性研究 電子版 Vol.3 No.1, (2013 年 T c µ T c Kammerlingh Onnes 77K ρ 5.8µΩcm 4.2K ρ 10 4 µωcm σ 77K ρ 4.2K σ σ = ne 2 τ/m τ 77K
2 2 T c µ T c 1 1.1 1911 Kammerlingh Onnes 77K ρ 5.8µΩcm 4.2K ρ 1 4 µωcm σ 77K ρ 4.2K σ σ = ne 2 τ/m τ 77K τ 4.2K σ 58 213 email:takada@issp.u-tokyo.ac.jp 1933 Meissner Ochsenfeld λ = 1 5 cm B = χ B =
The Physics of Atmospheres CAPTER :
The Physics of Atmospheres CAPTER 4 1 4 2 41 : 2 42 14 43 17 44 25 45 27 46 3 47 31 48 32 49 34 41 35 411 36 maintex 23/11/28 The Physics of Atmospheres CAPTER 4 2 4 41 : 2 1 σ 2 (21) (22) k I = I exp(
q quark L left-handed lepton. λ Gell-Mann SU(3), a = 8 σ Pauli, i =, 2, 3 U() T a T i 2 Ỹ = 60 traceless tr Ỹ 2 = 2 notation. 2 off-diagonal matrices
Grand Unification M.Dine, Supersymmetry And String Theory: Beyond the Standard Model 6 2009 2 24 by Standard Model Coupling constant θ-parameter 8 Charge quantization. hypercharge charge Gauge group. simple
211 kotaro@math.titech.ac.jp 1 R *1 n n R n *2 R n = {(x 1,..., x n ) x 1,..., x n R}. R R 2 R 3 R n R n R n D D R n *3 ) (x 1,..., x n ) f(x 1,..., x n ) f D *4 n 2 n = 1 ( ) 1 f D R n f : D R 1.1. (x,
1 1.1 H = µc i c i + c i t ijc j + 1 c i c j V ijklc k c l (1) V ijkl = V jikl = V ijlk = V jilk () t ij = t ji, V ijkl = V lkji (3) (1) V 0 H mf = µc
013 6 30 BCS 1 1.1........................ 1................................ 3 1.3............................ 3 1.4............................... 5 1.5.................................... 5 6 3 7 4 8
Dynkin Serre Weyl
Dynkin Naoya Enomoto 2003.3. paper Dynkin Introduction Dynkin Lie Lie paper 1 0 Introduction 3 I ( ) Lie Dynkin 4 1 ( ) Lie 4 1.1 Lie ( )................................ 4 1.2 Killing form...........................................
Microsoft Word - 11問題表紙（選択）.docx
A B A.70g/cm 3 B.74g/cm 3 B C 70at% %A C B at% 80at% %B 350 C γ δ y=00 x-y ρ l S ρ C p k C p ρ C p T ρ l t l S S ξ S t = ( k T ) ξ ( ) S = ( k T) ( ) t y ξ S ξ / t S v T T / t = v T / y 00 x v S dy dx
No δs δs = r + δr r = δr (3) δs δs = r r = δr + u(r + δr, t) u(r, t) (4) δr = (δx, δy, δz) u i (r + δr, t) u i (r, t) = u i x j δx j (5) δs 2
No.2 1 2 2 δs δs = r + δr r = δr (3) δs δs = r r = δr + u(r + δr, t) u(r, t) (4) δr = (δx, δy, δz) u i (r + δr, t) u i (r, t) = u i δx j (5) δs 2 = δx i δx i + 2 u i δx i δx j = δs 2 + 2s ij δx i δx j
K E N Z U 01 7 16 HP M. 1 1 4 1.1 3.......................... 4 1.................................... 4 1..1..................................... 4 1...................................... 5................................
CH, CH2, CH3êLèkä¥éÛó¶.pdf
CH CH CH 3 CH SFG 1 1 SFG 4 6 7 SFG 13 14 3-1 16 4-18 1 4 3 GF 8 4 CH 3 C 3v 31 CH CH c CH c µ c α c α cc a b CH α aa = α bb α aa = r α cc µ c α cc α aa CH r CH 1 ( µ c / r CH ) 0 ( α/ r CH ) 0 β 0 = (
kawa (Spin-Orbit Tomography: Kawahara and Fujii 21,Kawahara and Fujii 211,Fujii & Kawahara submitted) 2 van Cittert-Zernike Appendix A V 2
Hanbury-Brown Twiss (ver. 1.) 24 2 1 1 1 2 2 2.1 van Cittert - Zernike..................................... 2 2.2 mutual coherence................................. 3 3 Hanbury-Brown Twiss ( ) 4 3.1............................................
,,,17,,, ( ),, E Q [S T F t ] < S t, t [, T ],,,,,,,,
![,,,17,,, ( ),, E Q [S T F t ] < S t, t [, T ],,,,,,,,](/thumbs/91/105754403.jpg ",,,17,,, ( ),, E Q [S T F t ] < S t, t [, T ],,,,,,,,")
14 5 1 ,,,17,,,194 1 4 ( ),, E Q [S T F t ] < S t, t [, T ],,,,,,,, 1 4 1.1........................................ 4 5.1........................................ 5.........................................
反D中間子と核子のエキゾチックな 束縛状態と散乱状態の解析
.... D 1 in collaboration with 1, 2, 1 RCNP 1, KEK 2 . Exotic hadron qqq q q Θ + Λ(1405) etc. uudd s? KN quasi-bound state? . D(B)-N bound state { { D D0 ( cu) B = D ( cd), B = + ( bu) B 0 ( bd) D(B)-N
Step 2 O(3) Sym 0 (R 3 ), : a + := λ 1 λ 2 λ 3 a λ 1 λ 2 λ 3. a +. X a +, O(3).X. O(3).X = O(3)/O(3) X, O(3) X. 1.7 Step 3 O(3) Sym 0 (R 3 ),
1 1 1.1,,. 1.1 1.2 O(2) R 2 O(2).p, {0} r > 0. O(3) R 3 O(3).p, {0} r > 0.,, O(n) ( SO(n), O(n) ): Sym 0 (R n ) := {X M(n, R) t X = X, tr(x) = 0}. 1.3 O(n) Sym 0 (R n ) : g.x := gxg 1 (g O(n), X Sym 0
,,..,. 1
016 9 3 6 0 016 1 0 1 10 1 1 17 1..,,..,. 1 1 c = h = G = ε 0 = 1. 1.1 L L T V 1.1. T, V. d dt L q i L q i = 0 1.. q i t L q i, q i, t L ϕ, ϕ, x µ x µ 1.3. ϕ x µ, L. S, L, L S = Ld 4 x 1.4 = Ld 3 xdt 1.5
1. Introduction Palatini formalism vierbein e a µ spin connection ω ab µ Lgrav = e (R + Λ). 16πG R µνab µ ω νab ν ω µab ω µac ω νcb + ω νac ω µcb, e =
Chiral Fermion in AdS(dS) Gravity Fermions in (Anti) de Sitter Gravity in Four Dimensions, N.I, Takeshi Fukuyama, arxiv:0904.1936. Prog. Theor. Phys. 122 (2009) 339-353. 1. Introduction Palatini formalism
1 Part I (warming up lecture). (,,...) 1.1 ( ) M = G/K :. M,. : : R-space. R-space..
( ) ( ) 2012/07/14 1 Part I (warming up lecture). (,,...) 1.1 ( ) M = G/K :. M,. : : R-space. R-space.. 1.2 ( ) ( ): M,. : (Part II). 1 (Part III). : :,, austere,. :, Einstein, Ricci soliton,. 1.3 : (S,
Twist knot orbifold Chern-Simons
Twist knot orbifold Chern-Simons 1 3 M π F : F (M) M ω = {ω ij }, Ω = {Ω ij }, cs := 1 4π 2 (ω 12 ω 13 ω 23 + ω 12 Ω 12 + ω 13 Ω 13 + ω 23 Ω 23 ) M Chern-Simons., S. Chern J. Simons, F (M) Pontrjagin 2.,
untitled
20 11 1 KEK 2 (cosmological perturbation theory) CMB R. Durrer, The theory of CMB Anisotropies, astro-ph/0109522; A. Liddle and D. Lyth, Cosmological Inflation and Large-Scale Structure (Cambridge University
compact compact Hermann compact Hermite ( - ) Hermann Hermann ( ) compact Hermite Lagrange compact Hermite ( ) a, Σ a {0} a 3 1
014 5 4 compact compact Hermann compact Hermite ( - ) Hermann Hermann ( ) compact Hermite Lagrange compact Hermite ( ) 1 1.1. a, Σ a {0} a 3 1 (1) a = span(σ). () α, β Σ s α β := β α,β α α Σ. (3) α, β
( ) (ver )
ver.3.1 11 9 1 1. p1, 1.1 ψx, t,, E, p. = E, p ψx, t,. p, 1.8 p4, 1. t = t ρx, t = m [ψ ψ ψ ψ] ρx, t = mi [ψ ψ ψ ψ] p4, 1.1 = p6, 1.38 p6, 1.4 = fxδ ϵ x = fxδϵx = 1 π fxδ ϵ x dx = fxδ ϵ x dx = [ 1 fϵ π
i
009 I 1 8 5 i 0 1 0.1..................................... 1 0.................................................. 1 0.3................................. 0.4........................................... 3
( ) ) ) ) 5) 1 J = σe 2 6) ) 9) 1955 Statistical-Mechanical Theory of Irreversible Processes )
( 3 7 4 ) 2 2 ) 8 2 954 2) 955 3) 5) J = σe 2 6) 955 7) 9) 955 Statistical-Mechanical Theory of Irreversible Processes 957 ) 3 4 2 A B H (t) = Ae iωt B(t) = B(ω)e iωt B(ω) = [ Φ R (ω) Φ R () ] iω Φ R (t)
untitled
2 : n =1, 2,, 10000 0.5125 0.51 0.5075 0.505 0.5025 0.5 0.4975 0.495 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 2 weak law of large numbers 1. X 1,X 2,,X n 2. µ = E(X i ),i=1, 2,,n 3. σi 2 = V (X i ) σ 2,i=1, 2,,n ɛ>0
I A A441 : April 15, 2013 Version : 1.1 I Kawahira, Tomoki TA (Shigehiro, Yoshida )
I013 00-1 : April 15, 013 Version : 1.1 I Kawahira, Tomoki TA (Shigehiro, Yoshida) http://www.math.nagoya-u.ac.jp/~kawahira/courses/13s-tenbou.html pdf * 4 15 4 5 13 e πi = 1 5 0 5 7 3 4 6 3 6 10 6 17
() x + y + y + x dy dx = 0 () dy + xy = x dx y + x y ( 5) ( s55906) 0.7. (). 5 (). ( 6) ( s6590) 0.8 m n. 0.9 n n A. ( 6) ( s6590) f A (λ) = det(a λi)
0. A A = 4 IC () det A () A () x + y + z = x y z X Y Z = A x y z ( 5) ( s5590) 0. a + b + c b c () a a + b + c c a b a + b + c 0 a b c () a 0 c b b c 0 a c b a 0 0. A A = 7 5 4 5 0 ( 5) ( s5590) () A ()
K E N Z OU
K E N Z OU 11 1 1 1.1..................................... 1.1.1............................ 1.1..................................................................................... 4 1.........................................
( ) ( )
20 21 2 8 1 2 2 3 21 3 22 3 23 4 24 5 25 5 26 6 27 8 28 ( ) 9 3 10 31 10 32 ( ) 12 4 13 41 0 13 42 14 43 0 15 44 17 5 18 6 18 1 1 2 2 1 2 1 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 2 2 21 t (x(t) y(t)) 2 x(t) y(t) γ(t) (x(t) y(t))
chap9.dvi
9 AR (i) (ii) MA (iii) (iv) (v) 9.1 2 1 AR 1 9.1.1 S S y j = (α i + β i j) D ij + η j, η j = ρ S η j S + ε j (j =1,,T) (1) i=1 {ε j } i.i.d(,σ 2 ) η j (j ) D ij j i S 1 S =1 D ij =1 S>1 S =4 (1) y j =