アジアの資本移動の変化に関するクラスター分析 アジア域内の証券投資活性化に向けて
|
|
|
- あつみね うづき
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 * ** relation * ** Seoul conference China and Emerging Asia: Reorganizing the Global Economy? held by KIEP and Seoul National University Hugh Patrick Yung-Chul Park East Asian Economic Association 1th International Convention
2 IS 65% 4.9% 8% 8.2% 199
3 1 Foreign Direct Investment Portfolio Investment Loan 2 1 Push Pull Jeanneau and Micu [22] Ferrucci, et al. [24] Jeanneau and Micu [22] 2 2) Papaioannou [25] Daude and Frantzscher [26] 3) ) 2) Gravity Model 3)
4 relation Revenue Bond 4) JP A B B/A 3.3% % 1 22 ID MY PH SG TH CN HK JP KR ID MY PH SG TH CN HK KR IDMY PH SG THCNHKJPKR IMF, Direction of Trade Statistics (DOTS) 4)
5 Asian Development Bank, Key Indicators % 4.9% 1 8% 42.8%37.2% 8.2% 2 6.5% 3
6 Daiwa Institute of Research [26] IMF, Coordinated Portfolio Investment Survey (CPIS)
7 5) BIS ) Ant ant = A + B + C + D nt nt A a B b C c D d n 1 t % 5% 9% 51% nt nt nt ( a, b, c d ) S, nt ) nt nt nt 5) 6) BIS 4 7) 2
8 4 òø òú òú òú òú òôòø òú ó òú ó òú ó òú ó òú ùòòòø ò ó ó òø ó ó òú ó ó òú ó ó òú ó ó òôò ó òú ó òú ùòø òú ó ó òú ó ó òú ó ó ò ó ó òø ó ó òú ó ó òú ó ùòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòø òôòòòòò ó ó ò ó ó òø ó ó òú ó ó òú ó ó òú ó ó òôòòòòòòò ó òúó òúó òúó òúó òúó òúó òúó ò ó òøó òúó òúó òúó òúó òúó òúó òúó òôòòòòòòòòòòòø ó òú ó ó òú ó ó 1 2 3
9 4 òú ó ó òú ó ó òú ó ó òú ó ó òú ó ó òú ó ó òú ó ó òú ó ó ò ó ó òø ó ó òú ó ó òú ùòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòò òú ó òú ó òú ó òôòø ó òú ó ó òú ó ó òú ó ó òú ó ó òú ó ó òú ó ó òú ó ó òú ó ó òú ó ó òú ó ó òú ùòòòòòòòòò òú ó òú ó òú ó òú ó òú ó ò ó òø ó òú ó òú ó òôòú ò ó òø ó òú ó òú ó òôò òú òú òú òú òú ò Indonesia
10 ,99, , ,98, b 26-b b 25 No No.1 No ) ) 6 FDI PortfolioBank Loan
11 5 (1) (2) (3) (4)
12 ,99, 1 () () , ,98,1-2 5 () CN HK IN ID KR MH PH SG TW TH CNHKIN IDKRMY PH SGTWTH
13 HK96 CN96 IN96 ID96 KR96 MY96 PH96 SG96 TW96 TH HK5 CN5 IN5 ID5 KR5 MY5 PH5 SG5 TW5 TH5
14 TH TH96.2 TH99 TH98.1 TH97.9 TH2 TH1 TH5 TH4 TH Pull Push
15 9 4, 3, 2, 1, -1, -2, -3, -4, 1 5, -5, -1, -15, -2, -25,
16 11 12, 1, 8, 6, 4, 2, -2, -4, -6, -8, 12 14, 12, 1, 8, 6, 4, 2, -2, -4, -6, -8,
17 ) Pull Pull Push Pull NIES 13 16, 14, 12, 1, 8, 6, 4, 2, )
18 ) , 4,5 4, 3,5 3, 2,5 2, 1,5 1, ) Push 1-2 Pull
19 , 1,5 2, 2,5 3,
20 Push Pull Push Pull 1997 Push , , ,524 2, ,741 26, ,374 13, ,574 8, ,418 4, ,187 7, ,7 63,
21 Push 199 Pull Push 1 11) Pull Pull / Push La Porta, et al. [1999] Claessens, et al. [2] 11)
22 La Porta, et al. [1998] enforcement Allen, et al. [25] 2 12) 4 The Asian Committee of Financial Regulators relationship ) IT face to face
23 face to face 13) Credit Risk Database 14) 13) [26] 14) 2 1,
24 Private Finance Initiative PFI 3% 7% 3% 1/7= ) BIS )
25 16) a b % BRICs % ) 3
26 1 2% % %
27 16-a 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, BIS 16-b 7% 6% 5% 4% 3% 2% 1% % BIS
28 17-a 14, 12, 1, 8, 6, 4, 2, BIS 17-b 9% 8% 7% 6% 5% 4% 3% 2% 1% % BIS
29 18-a 14, 12, 1, 8, 6, 4, 2, BIS 18-b 7% 6% 5% 4% 3% 2% 1% % BIS
30 19-a 5, 45, 4, 35, 3, 25, 2, 15, 1, 5, BIS 19-b 8% 7% 6% 5% 4% 3% 2% 1% % BIS
31 2-a 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, BIS 2-b 7% 6% 5% 4% 3% 2% 1% % BIS
32 21-a 25, 2, 15, 1, 5, BIS 21-b 6% 5% 4% 3% 2% 1% % BIS
33 22-a 1, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, BIS 22-b 6% 5% 4% 3% 2% 1% % BIS
34 23-a 1, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, BIS 23-b 9% 8% 7% 6% 5% 4% 3% 2% 1% % BIS
35 24-a 16, 14, 12, 1, 8, 6, 4, 2, BIS 24-b 7% 6% 5% 4% 3% 2% 1% % BIS
36 25-a 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, BIS 25-b 9% 8% 7% 6% 5% 4% 3% 2% 1% % BIS
37 Allen, F., J. Qian, and M. Qian [25] Law, Finance and economic growth in China, Journal of Financial Economics, 77, Claessens, S., S. Djankov, and L. Lang [2], The Separation of Ownership and Control in East Asian Corporations, Journal of Financial Economics, 58, Daiwa Institute of Research [26], A Report on Institutional Arrangements Regulations Surrounding Cross-Border Capital Flows in ASEAN+3 Economies, July 26. Daude, C. and M. Frantzscher [26], The Pecking Order of Cross-border Investment, Working Paper Series No. 59, European Central Bank. Ferrucci, G., V. Herzberg, F. Soussa and A. Taylor [24], Understanding Capital Flows to Emerging Market Economies, Financial Stability Review, June 24, pp , Bank of England. [26] 21 COE, DP Jeanneau, S. and M. Micu [22], Determinants of International Bank Lending to Emerging Market Countries, BIS Working Papers No. 112, Bank for International Settlements. La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de-Silanes, and A. Shleifer [1999], Corporate Ownership Around the World, Journal of Finance, 54(2), pp La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de-Silanes, A. Shleifer, and R. Vishny [1998], Law and Finance, Journal of Political Economy, 16(6), pp Papaioannou, E. [25], What Drives International Bank Flows? Politics, Institutions and Other Determinants, Working Paper Series No. 437, European Central Bank. Wakeling, D., L. Rogers and D. Flood [24], Asian Capital Flows, Reserve Bank Bulletin, August 24, pp , Reserve Bank of Australia. Yoshino, N. and T. Iijima [26], China and Japan: Rivals or Collaborators. Paper presented at the conference held by KIEP and Seoul National University; May, Seoul, Korea. Available from URL: BIS Available from URL: Available from URL: Available from URL:
野村資本市場研究所｜アジアの金融競争力（PDF）
2013 Spring 1. GDP 3 26% 2. 3. 4. GDP 1 GDP 2000 25.4% 2012 10 IMF 1 GDP 28.7%GDP 10.7% 20.3% 2000 2012 10 2 3 2000 2012 4.2 5.4 2 2000 14% 2012 26% GDP 2012 30 10 32003 11 2013 Spring 100% 2 90% 80% 70%
和RIM28_向山氏.indd
9ASEAN 23 2615.314.7EU 12.3 27.1 223 2638.1 M&A45.3 2.6 CIS97.5 2 ASEAN 26 RIM 28 Vol.8 No.28 13 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 8 9 14 RIM 28 Vol.8 No.28 ASEAN 2 28 GDP 15 2 199798 5 5 15 1997 98 99 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 World
和RIMNo.22高安氏.indd
NIEsGDP 1990 200436.1 22.365.1 80 GDP 4 RIM 2006 Vol.6 No.22 RIM 2006 Vol.6 No.22 5 NIEs GDP GDP GDP GDP 90 GDP 1951 80 81 90 90 90 2001 2003 GDP 80 90 2001 2002 GDP 87GDP 80 GDP GDP 6 RIM 2006 Vol.6 No.22
untitled
Trade and Trade Finance in the 200809 Financial Crisis, IMF Working Paper WP/11/16., Understanding the Great Trade Collapse of 200809 and the Subsequent Trade Recovery, Economic Perspectives, 2Q/2011.
中国引き締め策の対外的影響
ito@nli-research.co.jp 2 2003 2004 9.8 47.8 10.7 84.3 3 1 1 4 5 9.6 9.8 47.8 28.6 84 60.2 30.2 7.5 SARS 15.4 338.83 11.9 726.97 42.7 SARS 10.7 12.8 ( ) 10.9 16.1 1997 6 8.7 11.9 20.7 21.6 16.2 17 7 15.3
伝統的な経済学では、「消費は重要ではあるが、気にしなくてもよい」と考えられてきた
2005 1 2004 SARS 2003 IMF 2004 5.0 2004 4.1 0.9 30 2005 2004 2005 2005 2005 2004 2005 IMF 2005 4.3 2004 IMF 2004 2003 3.0 4.3 2003 2 2003 2004 IT 2005 IMF 2005 2004 3.5 IT 1995 10 2.8% 10 2 1 IT IT 2004
Association of South East Asian Nations: ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN
Association of South East Asian Nations: ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN Free Trade Agreement: FTA FTA ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN The European Union: EU
de facto GDP 10 2 IMF remittance ODA FDI % ,701 2, ,620 2,
Iguchi Yasushi 1 21 7 1997 2001 WTO fragmentation ASEAN 32006 55% NAFTA 1 on-shoring off-shoring 2 No. 574 2008 9 13 de facto 2 21 2001 05 1 5 1 3 600 4 1GDP 10 2 IMF remittance ODA FDI 5 1 2000 2005 1000
国際流動性に関する財政的側面について
IMF SDR IMF 2011 6 1 2 2011 E-mail: obstfeld@econ.berkeley.edu / /2011.10 35 1. 2007 2009 2 Goodhart [1999] 2010 11 2. 4 1970 IMF 1960 36 /2011.10 international reserve 1 D 35 1 D 35 1960 Eichengreen [2011]
調査レポート
2011 8 19 2009 2011 2.4 108-8248 2-16-4 TEL03-6711-1250 12% 10% 8% 6% 4% 2% 0% -2% -4% -6% -8% -10% -12% 1/20 18% 16% 14% 12% 10% 8% 6% 4% 2% 0% -2% -4% -6% -8% -10% -12% -14% -16% -18% 2/20 35% 30% 25%
5 I The Current Situation and Future Prospects of the North Korean Economy presented at the 2014 Korea Dialogue Conference on Strengthenin
5 I. 3 1 1990 2 The Current Situation and Future Prospects of the North Korean Economy presented at the 2014 Korea Dialogue Conference on Strengthening North Pacific Cooperation organized by the East-West
FDI2 22 BRICs 22 ODA 22 PF SSA FDI International Finance Corporation 29
1 21 198 1 1 OECD/DAC 22 28 27 29 ODA Remittance 12 1 1 199 25 FDI2 22 BRICs 22 ODA 22 PF 1 1 1 2 23 SSA 23 1 3 1 4 1 5 21 24 25 FDI 1999 22 1 6 25 27 25 International Finance Corporation 29 13 23 23 1
和RIM28三浦氏＿アジア.indd
200711 100 1442 20 2006 WTO 20068,416 2025 1980 108 RIM 2008 Vol.8 No.28 doi moi 1990 19921993 IMF 1995ASEAN NIEs 1990 1997 NIEs 20071 10 ( RIM 2008 Vol.8 No.28 109 JBIC 1996 2005 NIEs World Bank2006 199610
OECD INVEST JAPAN jp/ij/index.htm
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org) Title OECD 諸国における経営資源の収益率の推計 Sub Title Rates of return on managerial resources : the case of OECD countries Author 遠藤, 正寛 (Endoh, Masahiro) Publisher 慶應義塾大学出版会 Publication
-February FRB BIS IMF BIS Spillover Spillovers BIS IMF EMEs
BIS FRB BIS BIS FRB QE QE -February FRB BIS IMF BIS Spillover Spillovers BIS IMF EMEs GDP GDP........ GDP BIS, 83rd Annual Report, June 2013, p.14 Ibid., p.14. -February 1 1 2009 2013 2) 2009 2013 2) -7.6-4.0
高齢化とマクロ投資比率―国際パネルデータを用いた分析―
196 2017 * ** ** ** ** 160 2 2 JEL Classification Codes E21, E22, J11 Keywords * ESRI 28 ESRI 29 3 17 ESRI ** 115 196 Population Aging and Domestic Investment An Analysis Using International Panel Data
- March IMF IMF IMF ITO The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade
M&A IMF IMF gold tranche - March IMF IMF IMF ITO The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade IMF IMF IMF GATT OECD OECD BITs. - March. U I = I (r m, i, Z * r m i Z * (= Z / Z) I / r m > I / i < I / Z *
Jeffrey Sachs Chang(1998) Steven Radelet and Jeffrey Sachs (1998) 1999 IMF 1999 World Bank 1998 [ 1998 ] 2000 p [ 20
![Jeffrey Sachs Chang(1998) Steven Radelet and Jeffrey Sachs (1998) 1999 IMF 1999 World Bank 1998 [ 1998 ] 2000 p [ 20](/thumbs/88/117909888.jpg "Jeffrey Sachs Chang(1998) Steven Radelet and Jeffrey Sachs (1998) 1999 IMF 1999 World Bank 1998 [ 1998 ] 2000 p [ 20")
62 1997 1996 1 1 2 1 Jeffrey Sachs1997 2 Chang(1998)Steven Radelet and Jeffrey Sachs (1998) 1999 IMF 1999 World Bank1998 [ 1998 ] 2000p.9196 [ 2003] 21 [ 2002 2000] [ 1998 1999 ] 1 62 21 3 4 5 6 90 7 3
Title ベンチャー企業の研究開発支出の決定要因 日本と台湾の事例を中心に Author(s) 蘇, 顯揚 Citation 經濟論叢 (1996), 158(1): Issue Date URL Right
Title ベンチャー企業の研究開発支出の決定要因 日本と台湾の事例を中心に Author(s) 蘇, 顯揚 Citation 經濟論叢 (1996), 158(1): 54-76 Issue Date 1996-07 URL https://doi.org/10.14989/45083 Right Type Departmental Bulletin Paper Textversion publisher
Tran Thi Van Anh
Title Kobe University Repository : Kernel アジア債券市場整備の取り組みと債券市場の現状について (To Which Stage Has Asian Bond Market Achieved?) Author(s) 三重野, 文晴 / 清水, 聡 / [ トラン, ティンバンアン ] Citation 国民経済雑誌,204(6):25-43 Issue date
金／金
IMF IMF M&A IMF IMF Gerchenkron Gerchenkron unbalanced growth Gerchenkron Johnson development state Hirschman IMF OECD IMF IMF GDP crony capitalism Krugman IMF capital market-based financial system bank-centered
スリランカ経済の現状と今後の展望
TEL 3-6733-17 E-mail chosa-report@murc.jp 1 / 21 216 9 6 29 TEL 3-6733-17 E-mail chosa-report@murc.jp 2 / 21 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, IMF, World Economic Outlook Database, April 216 % 2% 4% 6% 8% 1% World Bank,
グローバル化時代における日本の労働市場と留学生をめぐる考察
No.7, 77-88 (2006) Transition of the Roles of Japan s International Education Policy -From Foreign Aid to Global Citizenship- TAKEDA Satoko Nihon University, Graduate School of Social and Cultural Studies
野村資本市場研究所｜ベイルインの導入に向けた検討－破綻時に債権の損失吸収を図る新たな措置－（PDF）
1. SIFI 2. EU 1 FDIC G20 FSB 3. 4. FSB 2012 8 G20 88 2012 6 EU EU bail-in 1 ICB 2 write-down SIFI SIFI SIFI bail-out SIFI G20 too big to fail 2010 6 G20 SIFI 1 3 2011 11 FSBG20 1 2 3 2012 ICB PLAC 2011
日 本 のFTA 政 策 をめぐる 国 内 政 治 : JSEPA 交 渉 プロセスの Title 分 析 Author(s) 金, ゼンマ Citation 一 橋 法 学, 7(3): 683-719 Issue 2008-11 Date Type Departmental Bulletin Paper Text Version publisher URL http://hdl.handle.net/10086/16369
- March SCB -, -, -, -, -, -, -, -, -, -,,,,,, -, -, -, -,, -,,,, -,,,,,, - -,, -,, Survey of Current Business, July, Table (p. ), Oct, Table (p. ) S.
- March SCB -, -, -, -, -, -, -, -, -, -,,,,,, -, -, -, -,, -,,,, -,,,,,, - -,, -,, Survey of Current Business, July, Table (p. ), Oct, Table (p. ) S.C.B. July, Table SCB, -, - - -, -, - -,,,, - Ibid.,
調査レポート
1 27 6.3% FDI FDI 4 2.2 FDI 15% 1% 5% % -5% -1% -15% JBIC) 23 1 4 2.2 BRICs 2 1% 5% % -5% -1% -15% GDP 3 2 23 3 3% 28% 26% 24% 22% 2% 18% 16% IMF, International Financial Statistics 21 26 28 56 8/9 6 5
ＧＤＰギャップと潜在成長率
2003 output gap 80 1 20 90 20 70 2 1 2 output gap potential output 1 2 (2001) 3 potential rate of growth 2000 Meyer (2000) European Central Bank: (1999b) 2002 10 4 3 (2000) 4 4 () 5 5 5 6 () () 7 Total
バーリ＆ミーンズの株式会社論
The Modern Corporation and Private Property The Modern Corporation and Private Property The journal of Law and Economics Harvard Law Review The Modern Corporation and Private Property Harvard
産業・企業レベルデータで見た日本の経済成長.pdf
2003 11 10 IT IT JIP JCER ) 2003 CD-ROM http://www.esri.go.jp/jp/archive/bun/bun170/170index. html 1 JIP Jorgenson, Mun, andstiroh (2002) GDP 2 3 1951 1954 1957 1960 1963 1966 1969 1972 1975 1978 1981
物価変動の決定要因について ― 需給ギャップと物価変動の関係の国際比較を中心に―
NAIRU NAIRU NAIRU GDPGDP NAIRUNon- Accelerating Inflation Rate of Unemployment GDP GDP NAIRU Lown and RichFisher, Mahadeva and Whitley raw materials G NAIRUTurnerFai WatanabeNAIRU Watanabe nested NAIRU
目次 1. 安定成長を続ける経済 2. 顕在化した不動産市況悪化の影響 住宅問題とニュータウン開発 本格化する政府の対策と今後のリスク 1 2 結びに代えて RIM 211 Vol.11 No.41
韓国の不動産市況悪化と政府の対応 要 旨 調査部環太平洋戦略研究センター 上席主任研究員 向山英彦 21 6.2 25 9 2 21 211 211.52 23 2.12.6 21 11 RIM 211 Vol.11 No.41 1 目次 1. 安定成長を続ける経済 2. 顕在化した不動産市況悪化の影響 1 2 3. 住宅問題とニュータウン開発 1 2 3 4. 本格化する政府の対策と今後のリスク
中国の家計所得と消費構造に関する分析
20 9 2001 12 WTO 80 ...3...6...10...14... 14... 16 20 2003 3 13 625 9,500 3,000 200 825 9,000 2 4 4,000 2002 6 90 1 1 2002 1 1978 0.16 2001 0.32 20 2002 2001 0.51 household localization 2001 12 WTO 2006
........,.,.,..,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,., International Capital Market Litan et al a b c d M&A a a b E- e- Litan et al. : Table Levine World Bank Levine Greenwald et al. B R F R r R R r B R r B R r B R R Stiglitz
非上場企業におけるコーポレート・ガバナンス
* sfukuda@e.u-tokyo.ac.jp ** munehisa.kasuya@boj.or.jp *** No. 06-J-05 2006 3 103-8660 30 * ** *** 1 10 TFP 1 1 La Porta, Lopez-De-Silanes, and Shleifer (1999) OECD27 20 20 10 2 1 Lichtenberg and Pushner
表紙＿目次.PDF
JIL 2 1980 vol.3 15 3 1 3 15 18 IT 26 28 33 20 OECD 80 90 (1998) (2000) 2 Aghion et al. (1999) OECD 1970 1 2 70 1980 90 1.1 Kuznets U inverted U-shaped hypothesis GNP U 1 18901940 6 3 Kuznets(1955) (1963)
, 3, 1999, 4,,
1, 1992 2005,,, 10 2,, 1992 1998 1,,, 1998 2002 2,, 3,,, 2002, 2002 3 1 2 1 , 3, 1999, 4,, 3 14 11 2 I, 10,, 1992 2005, 2,, 3, 4,, II,, 1992 1998 1,, 1998 2002 2 2002 3 II-1: 1 1993 1998 90,, 1995 6850,,
Microsoft Word - 査読SP問題110510RR.doc
JAVCERM Journal [] 2 # 2011_01_Ronko 2010 1 4 2011 5 12 1 2 2 1999 National Bank of Keystone(Keystone), Pacific Thrift and Loan(PLT) FDIC CAMEAL 20 20 1 11 6 2.2 2000 Greenspan FRB 2000 IT IT Greenspan[2004]
topics_040
/ / SWF Sovereign Wealth Fund Ease of Doing Business 1.0 0.4 7.9 9.7 Bank of Canada [2015] Monetary Policy Report, January 2015. Bank of England [2015] Inflation Report, February 2015. BIS [2015]
OSIPP41_p1_2.eps
2007 年 冬 号 No.41 1 2 3 4 Peace Culture Review of Economic Design Journal of Labor Economics Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics Japan and the World Economy Daily Yomiuri Working Paper Series, Center for
74-2 岩間
128 74 2 21 3 128 134 Journal of the Japanese Association for Petroleum Technology Vol. 74, No. 2 March, 2009 pp. 128 134 Lecture * ** Received February 23, 2009 accepted February 26, 2009 The impact of
, FAD FAD FED FAO FAO WFP 1999 NGO ) 1. FAD FAD 1999 Lee, FAD % national coping s
20 30 280 350 1995 Devereux, 1988: 270 282 Food Availability Decline: FAD Food Entitlement Decline: FED FAD FAD FED 2000, 2002 FAD FAD FAD FED FAD Lee, 2003 FED 1999 59 2000 2000, 2001 2002 FAD FAD FED
Benson and Clay Before/After WTO World Development IndicatorsGDP GDP % % GDP % GDP % % % % EACEast African Community
Department of State Khost KhartoumDepartment of State Harman Benson and Clay Before/After WTO World Development IndicatorsGDP GDP % % GDP % GDP % % % % EACEast African Community Watanabe GDP % % GDP /
長岡慎介 ４５‐７８／４５‐７８
HSBC http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/5074068.stm HSBC HSBC Amanah Saadiq [CIBAFI 2005: 10; CIBAFI, 2009: 4; TheCityUK, 2013: 4; IFSB, 2013: 10; IFSB, 2014: 12] [TheCityUK 2013: 1] [UK Trade & Investment
株式保有構成と企業価値 ─コーポレート・ガバナンスに関する一考察─
q E-mail: kenji.nishizaki@boj.or.jp E-mail: kurasawa@ynu.ac.jp OECD Vives Tirole Shleifer and Vishny q %% %% % % Allen and Gale %% % Admati, Pfreiderer and Zechner Burkart, Gromb and Panunzi Cremer 1995Pagno
6) 7) MBO management buy-out 2 necessity sufficiency ) 21
1) 1997 15 02 03 751 1998 8 9 04 1996 16.1% 17.5% 26.9% 64.9% 63.3% 48.9% 2) 02 54.8% 59.0% 61.8% 78.6% 46.5% 1996 17.8% 19.9% 18.7% 42% 11.9% 3) 4) 01 3 1 3 2 03 04 1 TCL 5) Vol. 52, No. 4, October 06
第２章 第４代神奈川県庁舎（現本庁舎）の建設
217 218 219 PFI Private Finance Initiative 220 221 222 2 223 9 (M37) (M44) (T7) (M44) (T7) (T6) (T9) 224 (T15) (T9 ) (T2) (T6) (T11) T13) (S4) (T5) (S2) (T11) (T10) (T13) (T13) (T14) (T14) (T14) (T14)
-October TPP ASEAN RCEP TPP MV Islamic State, IS EU EU EU EU EU
AIIB BRICS TPP ASEAN ARF -October TPP ASEAN RCEP TPP MV Islamic State, IS EU EU EU EU EU EU EU UK MDGs AIIB BRICS ADB IT -October IoT Internet of Things Wearable AI IoT. GE IIC Finance+Technolpgy STEM
公的機関が関与した企業再生支援
14 56 2004.10 corporate control right debt overhang 4, 1998, p.253., p.263., 2000, p.44. 2004.10 57 DES DDS DES DDS 10 11 Hold out, 2000, pp.215-226, p.44. N 1265, 2004.4.1, pp.25-26. Coase theorem Ronald
はじめに
No.6, 397-408 (2005) Regional Integration East Asian Community Vision HORIUCHI Hiroshi Nihon University, Graduate School of Social Culture Studies In an effort to pursue the ambitious aim of laying the
- March
Grzegorz W. Ko odko TIGER - March - March - March - March - March - March - March - March - March Economist - March - March Economist - March PlanEcon - March - March - March - March - March
野村資本市場研究所｜JOBS法の成立と米国IPO市場の今後の動向（PDF）
JOBS IPO 1. IPO the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act, JOBS 2012 4 5 JOBS IPO 2. Regulation 144A Emerging Growth CompaniesEGC 404(b) 3. EGC JOBS IPO JOBS 4. JOBS NASDAQ IPO JOBS JOBS IPO 125 2012 Autumn
untitled
2009 5 Financial Inclusion Reserve Bank of IndiaRBI Kempson Beck et al. Sarma and Pais 97 RaoRBI Sen ibid. Imperial Bank of India State Bank of India SBI SBI 98 Rao RBI RBI Panagariya ibid. Joshi RBI SBI
公務員倫理問題への新アプローチ
OECD CPI CPI CPI CPI CPI CPI / GDP / / / /.............................. Transparency International Corruption Perception Index CPI CPI 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
2 / 24
2017 11 9 1 / 24 2 / 24 Solow, 1957 total factor productivity; TFP 5% 経済成長率の要因分解 4% 3% 2.68% 2.51% 2% 1% 0% 1.63% 1.50% 0.34% 0.42% 0.55% 0.97% 1.14% 0.86% 0.13% -0.59% -0.59% -0.09% 0.01% -1% 1970-80
橡motonishi.PDF
2000 3 ITME Discussion Paper No.26 850-8506 4-2-1 moto@net.nagasaki-u.ac.jp 1 1 MRF 1 (2000) 2 MRF 2 Schreft (1997) 3 2 Tobin (1985) Friedman (1992) 3 3 4 5 3 4 5 2 White (1984) 1 4 (1996) (1999) (1999)
商品流動性リスクの計量化に関する一考察（その2）―内生的流動性リスクを考慮したストレス・テスト―
E-mail: shigeru_yoshifuji@btm.co.jp E-mail: fuminobu_otake@btm.co.jp Bangia et al. G Bangia et al. exogenous liquidity risk endogenous liquidity risk et al LTCMLong Term Capital Management Fed G G T
2003年11月9日
ASEAN ASEAN 2005 6 28 ASEAN 1967 5 1984 6 1995 1997 1999 10 ASEAN 2003 1 1 AFTA ASEAN 6 0 5 AFTA AEC ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN WTO FTA ASEAN FTA ASEAN FTA JSEPA FTA ASEAN FTA ASEAN ASEAN FTA ASEAN FTA ASEAN FTA
PDFŠpŒ{Ł¶
Shinkin Central Bank Monthly Review 2003.12 hinkin Central Bank Monthly Review 200312 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Community Banker 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization Quarterly Journal of Economics Review of Economics and Statistics Internal Labor Markets and Manpower Analysis Economics of Education Review Journal of Political
Microsoft Word - Šv”|“Å‘I.DOC
90 ª ª * E-mailshinobu.nakagawa@boj.or.jp i ii iii iv SNA 1 70 80 2 80 90 80 80 90 1 80 90 98 6 1 1 SNA 2 1 SNA 80 1SNA 1 19931998 1 2-190 1,2 2 2-2 2-3,4 3 2-5 4 2030 2-3 3 2-15 97 20 90 2-15 9198 1.
戦間期日本企業の資金調達、資本コスト、資本構成：最適資本構成理論からみた1930年代における企業財務
1930 Modigliani and Miller [1958] 170 1930 2008 7 16 I E-mail: takashi.nanjou@boj.or.jp E-mail: cc00881@srv.cc.hit-u.ac.jp //2009.7 81 1. 1 2 M&A 3 4 1965 1969 1995 1995 1993 1 2008 2008 1985 2006 10 ROA
野村資本市場研究所｜日本の高度経済成長を支えた財政投融資の意義と教訓－アジアで応用する場合のヒント－（PDF）
2013 Summer 1. 2. 3. 4. 1 2013 Summer 1 2 2 1 2010 2020 11 8 2 7,260 300 2007 7,000 3 1 25.0% 20.0% 15.0% 10.0% 5.0% 0.0% -5.0% -10.0% 1953 1965 1980 1995 2004 2007 2010 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10
IMF http : // htm
1 2 1971 1973 1999 1997 2 IMF 1 1 2 3 1 4 1 2 5 6 1 2 7 IMF http : //www.imf.org/external/np/mfd/er/2006/eng/0706. htm 8 du jure de facto Reinhart Rogoff 20041946 2001 153 Levy-Yeyati Sturzenegger 20051974
untitled
[ 研究ノート ] 4% 19 19 20 1997a 20 Mitchell, 2002: 123 208 1997b; 2008 2 1960 1980 Abdel-Fadil, 1975; Hansen, 1969; Radwan & Lee, 1986 Abdel-Fadil, 1980; 85 Assaad, 1997 2 Hopkins Hopkins & Westergaard, 1998:
Perusahaan Pertambangan Minyak dan Gas Bumi Negara: Pertamina Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono 171
2001 2003 30 Perusahaan Pertambangan Minyak dan Gas Bumi Negara: Pertamina 200410 2004 200410Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono 171 2005 2005 11 2001 Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries: OPEC 2003BP
071-082_›ªficŸaŁF
49 2007 71 82 Okada Kazuhiko 1992 1997 1998 1990 1990 2004 103 49 2007 J. 1990 Millar, J, What s Wrong with the Maffia Anyway?, in G.Kaminsk (ed.), Economic Transition in Russia and the New States of Eurasia,
GNI GDP % % K % 3 NIES ,
Onozawa Jun 1 GNI 1 2013 1 60 1 2 middle-income trap1 ADB 14 3 1996 1998 2003 5 10 2004 198010 9% 2000 4 5% ADB 4 2010NEM: New Economic Model 5 2015 6 6 2020 2020 2020 2000 No. 633 2014 7 8 16 1 2013 1
デフレ不況下の金融政策をめぐる政治過程
1991 2003 GDP....................................... http://www.stat.go.jp/ http://www.boj.or.jp/ GDP http://www.esri.cao.go.jp/ GDP - - - inflation targeting Krugman a IS-LM liquidity trap Krugman b Krugman
Supreme Council of the GCC GCC GCC GCC 82 Unified Economic Agreement IMF SDR GCC
アジアの 視 点 通 貨 統 合 を 見 据 える 湾 岸 協 力 会 議 (GCC) 諸 国 の 課 題 調 査 部 環 太 平 洋 戦 略 研 究 センター 上 席 主 任 研 究 員 高 安 健 一 はじめに UAE Gulf Cooperation Council: GCC2007 12 2010 convergence criteria GCC customs union common market
平成１２年度 対日直接投資増加の理由と日本経済にもたらす影響に関する調査 第２章 対日投資と多国籍企業の戦略について
OLI 2-1. 2-1-1. 10% 2-1-2. 20 Hymer 1960 1 2 2 1 Vernon 1966 Smith 1987 Jacquemin 1985 21 Buckley & Casson 1976 Teece 1977 arm s-length internalize 2-1-3. OLI 40 OLI Dunning 1979 2 OLI 3 O: Ownership specific
中田真佐男 ３２３‐３５２／３２３‐３５２
IT FinTech Finance Technology e SNS (AI) (2013) (2015) ATM IC EMV VISA MasterJCB VISA Master (Union Pay) VISA Master JCB J-Debit J-Debit VISA IC Alipay QR POS nanaco WAON EdyJR Suica PASMO au Master au
46 RIM 2007 Vol.7 No HSBC WTO 2006
19782006 200716.7 2006 2007 RIM 2007 Vol.7 No.27 45 46 RIM 2007 Vol.7 No.27 2003 HSBC 1978 2006 2007 WTO 2006 RIM 2007 Vol.7 No.27 47 2003 10 92 95 98 99 4,000 20032006 2003 225 AMC 150 joint -stock companies
IMES DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES Discussion Paper No. 99-J-17 INSTITUTE FOR MONETARY AND ECONOMIC STUDIES BANK OF JAPAN 100-8630 203 IMES Discussion Paper Series 99-J-17 1999 6 * JEL classification E52 E58
Microsoft Word - Šv”|.DOC
ª ª * E-mail : shinobu.nakagawa@boj.or.jp ** E-mail : tomoko.katagiri@boj.or.jp i ii iii 1-1 70 6 2 90 1 1 1-2 90 2 3 90 1-1 70 3 1 2 93 97 98 98 98 98/4 3 1 1-2 35 1 80 90 25060 510 4 4 90 5 6 or 7 1
Œ{Ł¶.JBD
Special Administrative Region SAR NIES GDP GDP Peg GDP GDP GDP Laissez faire Hong Kong Annual Digest of Statistics 1995 Hong Kong External Trade Positive Noninterventionism GDP GDP / GDP / / Trade Involving
Powered by TCPDF ( Title 金利現実化措置以後の韓国における企業金融 : 年 Sub Title Korean corporate finance between 1965 and 1971 Author 李, 明輝 (Lee,
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org) Title 金利現実化措置以後の韓国における企業金融 : 1965 1971 年 Sub Title Korean corporate finance between 1965 and 1971 Author 李, 明輝 (Lee, Myunghwi) Publisher 慶應義塾経済学会 Publication year 2016
Kobe University Repository : Kernel Title 世 界 金 融 危 機 の 東 アジア 新 興 国 経 済 への 影 響 Author(s) 金 京, 拓 司 Citation 国 民 経 済 雑 誌, 202(5): 61-70 Issue date 2010-11 Resource Type Departmental Bulletin Paper / 紀 要
UNCTAD U. S. Exports and Imports, classified by OBE end-use commodity categories - Foreign Commerce and Navigation of the United States- U. S. Merchan
UNCTAD U. S. Exports and Imports, classified by OBE end-use commodity categories - Foreign Commerce and Navigation of the United States- U. S. Merchandise Trade Exports and Imports--, classified by BEA
橡20内藤仁美.PDF
1 1 2 2 1 2 3 1 2 1997 7 1 30 1 1 2 3 3 3 1 2 365 2003 2 IMF 3 4 1 1 2 2 1 1 1997 7 2 15 97 98 5 30 3 2 1 1 5 1 97 7 10 1 97 7 10 ASEAN4 7 10 366 4 25 35 2.8 2.7 6.8 2 97 10 11 2 10 11 10 7 1983 10 23
An Empirical Study of the Securities Firms' Dilemma on Financial Innovation through Diffusion of Internet Deals Yasugi Satoshi Bower, J. L., 1999, Disruptive technologies: Catching the wave,
untitled
2010 1 (50 60 ) (70 80 ) 90 : 1 1 2 3 4 4 2 20 GDP 3 (2008 ) GDP 1 (4.91 ) 2 (3.86 ) 3 (1.22 ) 4 (0.93 ) 1 3 1 (2008 ) 14.20 6,070 4.91 463 3.86 849( ) 3.65 468 2.85 657 2.65 653 2.29 406 1.61 233 1.61
スライド 1
2030 (2004) 1 2 3 1 212004 5.5203031 (1) 2004GDP () 2030GDP )1 2122005 21 2 ASEAN+5 3 207.3EU8.03.3 (2004) 4 10 22.8 16.11 121,006 100 593,369 100 19,715 16 247,813 42 34,217 28 88,772 15 6,832 6 43,746
RIETI Highlight VOL.25
RIETI Highlight 2009 SUMMER 25 VOL. Research Digest RIETI 2009 SUMMER VOL. 25 Highlight 1 2 3 5 8 10 12 13 14 19 ResearchDigest 20 24 28 32 36 38 40 41 42 44 45 RIETI Topics 01 CONTENTS 02 RIETI Highlight
JICA JETRO
Kyoto Bulletin of Islamic Area Studies, 9 (March 2016), pp. 197 230 JICA JETRO Area Studies TISCO Tata Steel Europe UNDP FS mélange J aime tuffāh uhibbu une pomme camarade A B Ph.D. EU EU EU EU EU EU
60 Vol. 44 No. 1 2 準市場 化の制度的枠組み: 英国 教育改革法 1988 の例 Education Reform Act a School Performance Tables LEA 4 LEA LEA 3
Summer 08 59 I はじめに quasi market II III IV V 1 II 教育サービスにおける 準市場 1 教育サービスにおける 準市場 の意義 Education Reform Act 1988 1980 Local Education Authorities LEA Le Grand 1991 Glennerster 1991 3 1 2 3 2 60 Vol. 44
ASEAN ARF ARF 3 ARF No (2002/08/06 )
9.11 1 90 2 1 30 1-2 20029 12-36 (37-50) 2 David M. Finkelstein, China s New Security Concept: Reading Between the Lines, Issue Paper, The CNA Corporation, April 1999 1999 20027 9ASEAN ARF 19967 ARF 3
11111
タイにおけるミャンマー人労働者の 賃金決定要因 甲南大学経済学部非常勤講師水野敦子 大阪市立大学経済学研究科 経済格差研究センター非常勤研究員 久保彰宏 2008 年 2 月 29 日 Discussion Paper No. 9 CREI Discussion Paper Series タイにおけるミャンマー人労働者の 賃金決定要因 甲南大学経済学部非常勤講師水野敦子 大阪市立大学経済学研究科 経済格差研究センター非常勤研究員
Psacharopulos Psacharopulos and Patrinos (1) Byron and Takahashi McMahon and Boediono Duflo (2)
Psacharopulos Psacharopulos and Patrinos (1) Byron and Takahashi McMahon and Boediono Duflo (2) (3) Survei Sosial Economi NasionalNational Socio-economic Survey SUSENAS KorModul (4) SUSENAS (5) (6) t
% OFHEO Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight ODPM Office of the Deputy Prime Minister's INSEE (2004 ) PCEOECDE
GDP 7 OFHEO 2005 3 272.89 1980 100 12.0 5 55.3 3 2 1 1979 2004 2 6 2000 68 14.0% 12.0% 10.0% 90 2.75 2005 3.4 8.0% 1 6.0% 4.0% 30.3 2.0% DC 20 0.0% OFHEOHouse Price Index 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000
8’¼‹ä127-141
- H.B. Lary Ilse Mintz - - - - - - - Aaa. %. % Baa. %. % Baa - Chase National Bank H. C. Taylor. % Annual Report of Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.(1933) 231 q Moody s - Aaa Aa A Baa.....
NICs GDP
\n Title 中国経済の内需主導型成長とその持続可能性 Author(s) 柳澤, 和也, Yanagisawa, Kazuya Citation 経済貿易研究 : 研究所年報, 39: 67-84 Date 2013-03-25 Type Departmental Bulletin Paper Rights publisher KANAGAWA University Repository NICs
M&A の経済分析：M&A はなぜ増加したのか
RIETI Discussion Paper Series 06-J-034 RIETI Discussion Paper Series 06-J-034 M&A の経済分析 :M&A はなぜ増加したのか 蟻川靖浩 宮島英昭 ( 早稲田大学 RIETI) 2006 年 4 月 要旨 1990 年代以降の M&A の急増の主要な要因は 産業や企業の成長性や収益性へのショックである とりわけ M&A を活発に行っている産業あるいは企業の特性としては
13 2002 8 ERINA 1 2 1 1. 1956 1960 19561960 1960 1970 197174 197579 1980 1980 1990 1980 1984 1980 1986 1990 2 1 199192 1 8 2 2000 9 11 2000 3 3 1 2 3 1 21 2001 2000 10 3 1995 2000 6 2001 2000 6 11 2000
開発金融増刊号
4 6 Y = f (, E, Y E ( Y E = α ( E α we py α 0 β E ( ( E β ( E β 6 ( = ( α β ( E β 8 i Y i f i, E i, i 9 Y = α α ( α E α S E 0 ( β β E β E( β E β β6 ( we Y = = = α β E py E β ( β Y Y B Y A r / pr p Y
5 5 (%) 9. 3 5 3 8. 7. 5. 5.. 5 5 5 3 8 5 3.9 3.. 1/3 1/9 /3 /9 3/3 3/9 /3 /9 5/3
I *1 *1 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) * ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) (JCR) G7 *1) *) (1) JCR AAA ( ) 1 () 5 - IT 1 5 5 (%) 9. 3 5 3 8. 7. 5. 5.. 5 5 5 3 8 5 3.9 3.. 1/3 1/9 /3 /9 3/3 3/9 /3 /9 5/3 1 (%).