商学 ６６‐６☆／７．松浦
|
|
|
- とよみ よどぎみ
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 FRB : Federal Reserve Board FRB FRB
2 Bureau of Economic Analysis, Survey of Current Bunisess, International Data http : //
3
4 DGP 6 2 ASEAN FRB EU 2001 ECB : European Central Bank ECB FRB Bureau of Economic Analysis, Survey of Current Business S.C.B. U.S. International Transactions Accounts Data
5 R IT R S&P S&P Dow Jones indices http : // R U.S. Department of Commerce, United States Census, New Residential Construction Data
6 Bureau of Labor Statistics, Database 2000 ICT Residential 7 Mortgage Backed Security, RMBS Collateralized 8 Debt Obligation, CDO MBS ABS, Asset Backed Securities MBS ABS ABS!
7 GDP Board of Governors of Federal Reserve System, Economic Reserci and Data http : // ! CDO http : // Indusutry Analysis, Failed Bank List,
8 AIG 850 AIG TARP : Troubled Assets Relief Program CDO 14 EESA : Emergency Economic Stabilization Act TARP FRB FRB CP 2007 CP CP GE FDIC TLGP GE GE FDIC GE GM GMAC 50 CIT FRB Federal Fund Rate FF
9 FRB FDIC FRB TARP 7000 TARP ,900 3,000 AIG, CIT 3, GM 1,949 Public Private Investment Fund , FRB FRB FRB FRB FRB FF FRB
10 1148 FRB 3 FRB FRB i FRB FRB J. P. 11 FRB FRB FRB AMLF Asset Backed Commercial Paper ABCP Money Market Fund MMMF Liquidity Facility MMF ABCP : Asset Backed Commercial Paper FRB MMF MMF 10 7 FRB CP CPFF, Commercial Paper Funding Facility 27 CP SPV SPV 3 CP ABCP CPFF 7390 MMF FRB MMF MMIFF, Money Market Investor Funding Facility MMIFF 7 90 CP MMF 14
11 1149 FRB FRB TALF, Term Asset-Backed Security Loan Facility TALF ABS TALF ABS ABS FRB TALF 5 ABS FRB AAA ABS 15 ABS ABS AAA ABS SBA FRB TALF TALF CMBS Commercial Mortgage Backed Securities TALF TALF FRB MMF FRB QE : Quantitative Easing Federal Reserve Board, Board of Governor of the Federal Reserve System B. G. F. R. S Press Release, Date : November 25, 2008 http : // htm FRB B. G. F. R. S, news and events,
12 1150 FRB credit easing FRB FF FRB FOMC 1951 RMBS QE2 Large-Scale Asset Purchase Programs, LSAP QE QE FRB QE 3 FRB 5 FRB FRB FBR FOMC MBS FRB FF FRB B. G. F. R. S, Economic Research & Data, Selected Interested Rates, FF rate. All Liquidity FacilitiesTerm Auction credit-frb Primary dealer credit facility 19 Primary credit, Secondary credit, Seasonal credit, Asset-Backed Commercial Paper Money Market Mutual Fund Liquidity Facility, Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility, Commercial Paper Funding Facility, central bank liquidity swaps.
13 FRB Federal Reserve Board, Data Base Http : //w.w.w.federalreserve gov/ MBS
14 1152 FRB FRB 22 3 FRB FRB FRB FRB FRB FF FF 3 17 FRB JP Dungan, R., 2012 p.74.
15 FF Board of the Federal Reserve System, Economi Research and Data. http : //www. federalreserve.gov/ FF FRB FF FRB RMBS FRB Agency MBS Credit Easing FF S&P FRB
16 Board of the Federal Reserve System, Economic Research and Data MMF FRB 2 TARP EESA FRB FRB FRB FRB Bureau of the Fiscal Service, Treasury Bulletin, Ownership of Federal Securities http : // gov/fsindex.htm
17 Bureau of the Fiscal Service, treasury of Bulletin, data base. 9 Bureau of Fiscal Service, treasury of Bulletin. FRB
18 1156 FRB FRB 2010 ECB OMT, Outright Monetary Transaction EU Board of Governer of Federal Reserve Systme, Eoconomic Research & Data Exchange rate-h.10 http : //
19 Bureau of Labor Statistics, Labor Force Statistics from the current population Survey, Household data not seasonally adjusted quarterly averages E-16, umemployment rates by age, sex, race, and Hispanic or Latino ethnicity http : //
20 OECD, Stat Extrats, Labour Income Shares Ratios http : //stats.oecd.org/ Bureau of Labor Statistics, Earnings and employment by occupation, race, ethnicity, and sex, 2010 http : // Income and Poverty in the United States : 2013, Figure 4, Number of poverty and poverty rate, p.12 https : // cps.html
21 MMF FRB R. J Bureau of Economic Analysis, Survey of Current Business, various issues. Bureau of the Fiscal Service, Treasury Bulletin, Ownership of Federal Securities. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Earnings and employment by occupation, race, ethnicity, and sex, Dungan, R., The New Depression, The Breakdown of the Power Monetary Economy, John Wiley & Sons Singapore Pte. Ltd. Federal Reserve Board, Board of Governor of the Federal Reserve System, Press Release, Data. U. S. Department of Commerce, United States Census, New Residential Construction.
FRB EU EU.GM JFE AIG HD
FRB EU EU.GM JFE AIG HD BNP CEO JP AIG S & LSaving and Loan Association S & L SIVStructured Investment Vehicle FRB IMF OECD IMF CDS Crejit Default Swap CDOCollateralized Debt Obligation AIG CDS SIV CDO
担保報告書.PDF
(1) (2) (1) (2) 1 (1) (2) (1) (2) (1) (2) TOB (1) (2) 2 (1) (2) (1) (2) (1) (2) (3) (1) (2) (3) (1) (2) TOB (1) (2) (1) (2) 3 4 80 90 5 10 1 1 3 Q2 57.6% 47.5% 44.8% Q3 94.1%Q5 6 CP Commercial Paper 11
2 2 3 4 5 5 6 10 14 17 18 18 20
1. 1990 2001 38 02 2. 90 3. 00 3 4. 02 5.5 3.6 2 5. 02 03 GDP 0 2 2 3 4 5 5 6 10 14 17 18 18 20 1930 50 81090 10 2001 38 2.2 2.301 7 02 3.603 5 3.5 FRB03 2 11 BS BS BS 90 1 Personal Income and Its Disposition
Œ{Ł¶†^›Í‰{’MŸY
Troubled Assets MBS LIBOR The Economist 2008.10.8 the self-destructive power Appendix Appendix cf GDP IT IT GDP ISDA CDS CDS ISDA CEO GDP GDP Greenspan Concedes Error on Regulation FRB FRB self-correcting
米国における金融・資本市場改革の展開
1980 DIDMCA 1982 1994 20 & 1989 FIRREA 1991 FDICIA 1999 11 12 Gramm-Leach- Bliley Act P.L.106-102, 113 STAT.1338 1933 Glass-Steagall Act P.L. 73-66, 48 STAT. 162 66 1980 1981 1980 1990 & Savings and Loan
% OFHEO Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight ODPM Office of the Deputy Prime Minister's INSEE (2004 ) PCEOECDE
GDP 7 OFHEO 2005 3 272.89 1980 100 12.0 5 55.3 3 2 1 1979 2004 2 6 2000 68 14.0% 12.0% 10.0% 90 2.75 2005 3.4 8.0% 1 6.0% 4.0% 30.3 2.0% DC 20 0.0% OFHEOHouse Price Index 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000
金融システムレポート（2008年3月号）
inancial ystem eport 1 Box 1 5 1 1 1 1 3 17 5 7 Box 9 Box 3 3 Box 3 Box 5 36 Box 6 38 Box 7 1 1 1 3 3 5 Box 8 58 Box 9 6 6 1 6 66 Box 1 7 7 1 3 Box 1 7 7 8 1 1 3 Box Box 1 B1-1 B1-1 origination distribution
-February FRB BIS IMF BIS Spillover Spillovers BIS IMF EMEs
BIS FRB BIS BIS FRB QE QE -February FRB BIS IMF BIS Spillover Spillovers BIS IMF EMEs GDP GDP........ GDP BIS, 83rd Annual Report, June 2013, p.14 Ibid., p.14. -February 1 1 2009 2013 2) 2009 2013 2) -7.6-4.0
商学 ６５‐５☆／１４．植田
708 709 2000 2000 1 3 hedge speculative ponzi G Π DS G Πt DSt t 1,2,...,n 1 G Πt DSt 1 t j 2 G Πt DSt j 1 t n 3 710 G Πt DSt 1 t n 1 4 G Πt DSt t n 5 2 Minsky Foley 2003 Charles 2008 a Lima and Meirelles
Association of South East Asian Nations: ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN
Association of South East Asian Nations: ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN Free Trade Agreement: FTA FTA ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN The European Union: EU
8’¼‹ä127-141
- H.B. Lary Ilse Mintz - - - - - - - Aaa. %. % Baa. %. % Baa - Chase National Bank H. C. Taylor. % Annual Report of Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.(1933) 231 q Moody s - Aaa Aa A Baa.....
地方債と地方財政規律
* 1990 GDP 40 JEL Classification: H39, H54, H63, H72, H77 Key words: * 16 (2005a, b) 1 Local Government Bonds and Fiscal Discipline By Takero Doi, Tomoko Hayashi and Nobuyuki Suzuki Abstract Outstanding
第１章Word版.PDF
2007 21 1564 1 15 (a) (b) (c) 80 90 90 (a)(b)(c) 90 2 90 90 3.8 13.1 90 2.6 1.2 1998 19982025 0.43 202550 0.94 90 0.14 0.08 0.87 0.91 1.71 2.10 1.93 1.88 3 1998 81 80 90 1.9 2.5 90 0.5 70 3.5 80 2.8 70
- March SCB -, -, -, -, -, -, -, -, -, -,,,,,, -, -, -, -,, -,,,, -,,,,,, - -,, -,, Survey of Current Business, July, Table (p. ), Oct, Table (p. ) S.
- March SCB -, -, -, -, -, -, -, -, -, -,,,,,, -, -, -, -,, -,,,, -,,,,,, - -,, -,, Survey of Current Business, July, Table (p. ), Oct, Table (p. ) S.C.B. July, Table SCB, -, - - -, -, - -,,,, - Ibid.,
資金循環の日米欧比較
資金循環の日米欧比較 2018 年 8 月 14 日銀行調査統計局 * 本資料では 日 米 欧 日 米について 主要な部門を比較 掲載しています Ⅰ. 日米欧比較 データはいずれも 2018 年 3 月末現在 図表 1 金融機関の金融資産 負債構成 資産 ( 3,46 兆円 ) 負債 ( 3,30 兆円 ) 預金取扱機関 ( 1,939 兆円 ) 貸出 ( 1,903 兆円 ) 保険 年金基金 %
資金循環の日米欧比較
資 金 循 環 の 日 米 欧 比 較 2016 年 6 月 22 日 銀 行 調 査 統 計 局 * 本 資 料 では 日 米 欧 日 米 について 主 要 な 部 門 を 比 較 掲 載 しています Ⅰ. 日 米 欧 比 較 日 米 は2016 年 3 月 末 ユーロエリアは201 年 12 月 末 現 在 図 表 1 金 融 機 関 の 金 融 資 産 負 債 構 成 資 産 ( 3,236
個人消費支出からみた戦間期の景気変動:LTES個人消費支出の再推計
LTES LTES LTES 1 GNE GDP GDP 1920 LTES GDP LTES 1931 GDP 76 Hi-Stat E-mail: kiyohito.utsunomiya@boj.or.jp / /2009.3 73 1. Long-Term Economic Statistics LTES 1 1971 LTES 2 LTES LTES System of National Accounts
和RIMNo.22高安氏.indd
NIEsGDP 1990 200436.1 22.365.1 80 GDP 4 RIM 2006 Vol.6 No.22 RIM 2006 Vol.6 No.22 5 NIEs GDP GDP GDP GDP 90 GDP 1951 80 81 90 90 90 2001 2003 GDP 80 90 2001 2002 GDP 87GDP 80 GDP GDP 6 RIM 2006 Vol.6 No.22
わが国のレポ市場について―理論的整理と実証分析―
GCGC SC GCSC SC SC E-mail: yasunari.inamura@boj.or.jp E-mail: naohiko.baba@boj.or.jp GC general collateralscspecial collateral Griffiths and Winters GCFF Jordan and JordanDuffie matched book GC GC SC DuffieKrishnamurthy
米国住宅ローンの枠組みv2.PDF
mortgage residential mortgage commercial FHA 1934 FHA $67,500 VA Fannie Mae, Federal National Mortgage Association 1938 (27.5 ) 01/12/19 1 Fannie Mae is a private, shareholder-owned company that works
取引法の観点からみた資金決済に関する諸問題
1 / /2010.1 105 1. 1 1 1 2008 5 2 2008 10 3 1 4 2007 8 1 2008 32 2 2008 5 12 2009 1 2009 2009 3 6 2008 12 2008 3 1842 32 4 2006 10 2009 4 2009 http://www.shojihomu.or.jp/saikenhou/indexja.html 2005 11
Kobe University Repository : Kernel Title 世 界 金 融 危 機 の 東 アジア 新 興 国 経 済 への 影 響 Author(s) 金 京, 拓 司 Citation 国 民 経 済 雑 誌, 202(5): 61-70 Issue date 2010-11 Resource Type Departmental Bulletin Paper / 紀 要
第９章 香港
1842 1997 1997 7 1 4 97 7 GDP 97 5.0% 98 5.1% 1999 98 1 GDP 99 2 5 1997 2 1999 2000 22 9 37 113 52 114 30 211 1,100 3 95% 2000 687 1996 60.3 32.6 95.2 38.1 1974 1993 25 8,000 24 9,180 214 331 757 757 1573
Tran Thi Van Anh
Title Kobe University Repository : Kernel アジア債券市場整備の取り組みと債券市場の現状について (To Which Stage Has Asian Bond Market Achieved?) Author(s) 三重野, 文晴 / 清水, 聡 / [ トラン, ティンバンアン ] Citation 国民経済雑誌,204(6):25-43 Issue date
野村資本市場研究所｜「財政の崖」回避をめぐる議論と米国地方債市場（PDF）
1. 1 2011 28% 2. 2012 12 3. 2013 1 2 4. 1 1 2013 1 2 2 1 2 Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, Regulatory Fiscal cliff negotiation could affect the taxexemption, December 10 2012. Bloomberg,
fringe benefit 6565 1 FEHB Federal Employees Health Benefits States Employee Health Benefits Medicare 1965 TitleX VIII of the Social Security Act1966
特 集 :アメリカの 社 会 保 障 アメリカの 医 療 保 障 システム 雇 用 主 提 供 医 療 保 険 の 空 洞 化 とオバマ 医 療 保 険 改 革 長 谷 川 千 春 1980 20 1 2 2009 2010 2 Employer- Sponsored Health Insurance I 65 16 fringe benefit 6565 1 FEHB Federal Employees
ㅊㅪㅳã…
G FF FBR p J K p FRB GM GNP GM GM UAW GM NY GM GM GM GM GM GM GM GM GM MBA p A B GM Q GM / / GM G TOPIX VUL V U OMB ISDA CDS the notional amount outstanding ISDA] CDS CDS CDS Over The Counter OTC FRB FRB
マレーシアの債券市場と拡大するイスラム債発行 2001 Capital Market Masterplan 2002 図表 3 マレーシア企業の資金調達方法 金融機関融資 19, , , ,790 10,011
アジアの視点 マレーシアの債券市場と拡大するイスラム債発行 調査部環太平洋戦略研究センター 主任研究員 清水聡 1. はじめに : マレーシアの債券市場と資金調達の概要 10 97 5,706 2007 3.6 2.2 6.8 2003 ABMI Asian Bond Markets Initiative 図表 1 10 1,600 1,400 1,200 1,000 800 600 400 200
Microsoft Word - 査読SP問題110510RR.doc
JAVCERM Journal [] 2 # 2011_01_Ronko 2010 1 4 2011 5 12 1 2 2 1999 National Bank of Keystone(Keystone), Pacific Thrift and Loan(PLT) FDIC CAMEAL 20 20 1 11 6 2.2 2000 Greenspan FRB 2000 IT IT Greenspan[2004]
大垣尚司 １８９‐２１４／１８９‐２１４
GSE GSE (government sponsored entities) GSE RMBS GSE GSE GSE CRT GSE GNMA (Government National Mortgage Association) Fannie Mae Freddie MacGSE [government sponsored entities] (Federal Home Finance Agency,
Psacharopulos Psacharopulos and Patrinos (1) Byron and Takahashi McMahon and Boediono Duflo (2)
Psacharopulos Psacharopulos and Patrinos (1) Byron and Takahashi McMahon and Boediono Duflo (2) (3) Survei Sosial Economi NasionalNational Socio-economic Survey SUSENAS KorModul (4) SUSENAS (5) (6) t
公的年金制度の考え方と抜本改革の方向性.pdf
9 8 1 (1) (9-1-1) (9-1-2) ( ) 9-1-1 9-1-3 1997 ( 9) 97 70 97 70 ( ) 60 60 15 60 97 70 60 ( 15 ) 2 5 3 60 9-1-2 GNP 40 147 60 1 9-1-2 60 60 40 (9-1-3) (9-1-4) ( ) 9-1-3 30 40 9-1-4 60 30 40 (9-1-5) (9-1-6)
野村資本市場研究所｜ASEAN投資信託市場の現状と課題（PDF）
213 Spring ASEAN 1. 2. 5.7 ASEAN 3. 3.3 4. 2.4 5. ASEAN 76 1 ASEAN 213 ASEAN 4 ASEAN ASEAN 2 1 1 1 1 1 OECD The Emerging Middle Class in Developing Countries January 21 2 Cerulli Associates Asset Management
ＧＤＰギャップと潜在成長率
2003 output gap 80 1 20 90 20 70 2 1 2 output gap potential output 1 2 (2001) 3 potential rate of growth 2000 Meyer (2000) European Central Bank: (1999b) 2002 10 4 3 (2000) 4 4 () 5 5 5 6 () () 7 Total
Microsoft Word - Šv”|.DOC
ª ª * E-mail : shinobu.nakagawa@boj.or.jp ** E-mail : tomoko.katagiri@boj.or.jp i ii iii 1-1 70 6 2 90 1 1 1-2 90 2 3 90 1-1 70 3 1 2 93 97 98 98 98 98/4 3 1 1-2 35 1 80 90 25060 510 4 4 90 5 6 or 7 1
untitled
CDO 1. 100 1 1 1 1 2 11 2111 2005 0.5 2006 1 20.5%0.5 20.75% 1.0% 2007 3 1 11 1 4 1 1 1 1 3 1 4 6 1 8 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 3 4.273.800.47%47 5 5.25%4.101.15115 10 5.514.580.9393 7 2. 26510 1.5 100 20141220
GDP tax expenditure GDP GDP GDP TANF GDP
特集 : アメリカの社会保障 21 世紀のアメリカ社会保障 渋谷博史 中浜隆 櫻井潤 1 2 3 1 2 1960 1980 1963 1980 Reaganomics 1960 1990 2000 1 21 1960 1980 4 21 1950 1 2 1 2 3 2 1 2 3 3 2 2-1 1 2006 1 GDP 8.9 2 tax expenditure GDP 0.7 0.8 4 3
-March Internal Revenue Service IRS Controlled Foreign Corporation, CFC Foreign Sales Corporation, FSC Interest Charge-Domestic International Sales Co
US CFC CFC CFC U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis,, WTO -March Internal Revenue Service IRS Controlled Foreign Corporation, CFC Foreign Sales Corporation, FSC Interest Charge-Domestic
untitled
S C B SHINKIN CENTRAL BANK 103-0028 1-3-7 TEL.03-5202-7671 FAX.03-3278-7048 URL http://www.scbri.jp 20 1015 GDP 80 S&L OFHEOHPI 2007 79 0.4 1994 13 1975 2007 912 1995 1-3 100 OFHEO 1980 2000 GDP ( 5.9)
参考：労働統計機関一覧｜データブック国際労働比較2018｜JILPT
労働統計機関一覧 ( 注 ) 掲載機関の都合によりURLが変更される場合がある 最新の各国労働統計機関のリンク集については, 労働政策研究 研修機構ウェブサイト (http://www.jil.go.jp/foreign/ link/) を参照されたい ------------------------- 国際機関等 ------------------------ 国際労働機関 (ILO) International
橡motonishi.PDF
2000 3 ITME Discussion Paper No.26 850-8506 4-2-1 moto@net.nagasaki-u.ac.jp 1 1 MRF 1 (2000) 2 MRF 2 Schreft (1997) 3 2 Tobin (1985) Friedman (1992) 3 3 4 5 3 4 5 2 White (1984) 1 4 (1996) (1999) (1999)
p029_045 コミュニケーション科学30_1(林先生).indd
日 本 国 家 の 決 断 2008 9 15 BRICS 2009 2 27 8 25 7000 8000 29 10 AIG 10 FRB 7000 10 1990 FRB 30 30 60 31 15 5 100 1929 1929 1920 32 30 1929 1927 1 155 1929 8 9 380 10 29 230 2008 9 BRICS 1929 1930 1935 100
野村資本市場研究所｜ベイルインの導入に向けた検討－破綻時に債権の損失吸収を図る新たな措置－（PDF）
1. SIFI 2. EU 1 FDIC G20 FSB 3. 4. FSB 2012 8 G20 88 2012 6 EU EU bail-in 1 ICB 2 write-down SIFI SIFI SIFI bail-out SIFI G20 too big to fail 2010 6 G20 SIFI 1 3 2011 11 FSBG20 1 2 3 2012 ICB PLAC 2011
わが国銀行業の将来像― 預金通貨需要からのアプローチによるマクロ的サイズの検討―
M1GDP M2M1 M1GDP M2M1 E-mail: kazuhiko.ishida@boj.or.jp E-mail: hitoshi.mio@boj.or.jp M2GDP Modigliani-Miller: MM Hoshi and Kashyap HKHK HK Quarterly Financial Report for Manufacturing, Mining and Trade
Global SFxxx.indd
Global Structured Finance 'AAA' And Investment-Grade Annual Default Rate (%) 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 2010 Investment-grade default rate Investment-grade default and near-default rate 'AAA' default rate 'AAA'
376-08ooi.indd
統計指標からみたハウジングアフォーダビリティの国際的動向 Ⅰ はじめに United States Census BureauForeclosure Rates... Housing Affordability Affordable Housing United States Census Bureau c, p.. Ⅱ ハウジングアフォーダビリティ統計に関する先行研究 Ernst Engel Engel
アジアにおける証券化取引の現状と期待される役割 目次はじめに 1. 証券化のメリットとリスク 2. アジアの証券化取引の現状 証券化取引を拡大するための課題 アジアにおける証券化促進の必要性と方策 はじめに sec
アジアにおける証券化取引の現状と期待される役割 要 旨 調査部 主任研究員 清水聡 1997 ASEAN 2008 70 RIM 2014 Vol.14 No.53 アジアにおける証券化取引の現状と期待される役割 目次はじめに 1. 証券化のメリットとリスク 2. アジアの証券化取引の現状 1 2 3 4 5 3. 証券化取引を拡大するための課題 1 2 4. アジアにおける証券化促進の必要性と方策
野村資本市場研究所｜国際基準との調和も踏まえた米国SIFI規制（PDF）
SIFI 1. FRB 2011 12 20 500 FRB SIFI 500 FRB 2. SIFI FRB G-SIB 2016 LCR NSFR 3. SIFI 25 SIFI 10 2 SIFI 4. SIFI 83 2012 Winter FRB FRB 2011 12 20 1 SIFIFRB 2011 4 6 2012 165 (a) interconnected 500 bank holding
農林金融2007年08月号
2005 1947 4.54 61 1.96 75 891.57 66 1.58 20051.26 061.32 2.07 1974 14 156465 1950 70 ageing society 94aged society 140612 20.9 72 47115 4024 052,777 2025 20362046 20558,993 1812 06 12 205550 2055 2105
スリランカ経済の現状と今後の展望
TEL 3-6733-17 E-mail chosa-report@murc.jp 1 / 21 216 9 6 29 TEL 3-6733-17 E-mail chosa-report@murc.jp 2 / 21 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, IMF, World Economic Outlook Database, April 216 % 2% 4% 6% 8% 1% World Bank,
DP/02-2 Discussion Paper, Version 1, JEL classification : G21, G
DP/02-2 Director General for Economic Assessment and Policy Analysis CABINET OFFICE DP/02-2 Discussion Paper, Version 1, 2002 9 JEL classification : G21, G28 E-mail: keiichi.omura@mfs.cao.go.jp E-mail:
IMES DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES Discussion Paper No. 99-J-17 INSTITUTE FOR MONETARY AND ECONOMIC STUDIES BANK OF JAPAN 100-8630 203 IMES Discussion Paper Series 99-J-17 1999 6 * JEL classification E52 E58
物価変動の決定要因について ― 需給ギャップと物価変動の関係の国際比較を中心に―
NAIRU NAIRU NAIRU GDPGDP NAIRUNon- Accelerating Inflation Rate of Unemployment GDP GDP NAIRU Lown and RichFisher, Mahadeva and Whitley raw materials G NAIRUTurnerFai WatanabeNAIRU Watanabe nested NAIRU
付表 1 / Appendix table 1) 中国際収支状況 速報 ) Balance of Payments Statistics, 1st Half of 2018 F.Y.Preliminary) 1. サービス収支 1. Services 項目 単位 : 億円 ) 100 million
中国際収支状況 速報 ) Balance of Payments Statistics, 1st Half of 2018 F.Y.Preliminary) 国際収支状況 速報 ) Balance of Payments Preliminary) 単位 : 億円,%) 100 million yen,%) 項 目 2018 F.Y. 1st half 前期 2017 F.Y. 2nd half 2017
国際流動性に関する財政的側面について
IMF SDR IMF 2011 6 1 2 2011 E-mail: obstfeld@econ.berkeley.edu / /2011.10 35 1. 2007 2009 2 Goodhart [1999] 2010 11 2. 4 1970 IMF 1960 36 /2011.10 international reserve 1 D 35 1 D 35 1960 Eichengreen [2011]
5 5 (%) 9. 3 5 3 8. 7. 5. 5.. 5 5 5 3 8 5 3.9 3.. 1/3 1/9 /3 /9 3/3 3/9 /3 /9 5/3
I *1 *1 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) * ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) (JCR) G7 *1) *) (1) JCR AAA ( ) 1 () 5 - IT 1 5 5 (%) 9. 3 5 3 8. 7. 5. 5.. 5 5 5 3 8 5 3.9 3.. 1/3 1/9 /3 /9 3/3 3/9 /3 /9 5/3 1 (%).
untitled
[ 研究ノート ] 4% 19 19 20 1997a 20 Mitchell, 2002: 123 208 1997b; 2008 2 1960 1980 Abdel-Fadil, 1975; Hansen, 1969; Radwan & Lee, 1986 Abdel-Fadil, 1980; 85 Assaad, 1997 2 Hopkins Hopkins & Westergaard, 1998:
我が国税制の現状と課題
1 (%) 60 30 ( ) 100 200 PHP 2 3 4 5 6 7 55.9 % 48.3 % 65.3 % 28.6 % 36.9 % 14.3 % 22.6 % 35.8 % 9.7% 26.1 % 10.1 % 38.2 % 26.7 % 29.2 % 36.7 % (2001 ) (1997) (1996) (1997) (1997) 17.8 12.6 15.8 15.2 15.2
2 3 FB 4 5 6 13 7 8 10 11 12 15 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 57 233 124 421 76 JGB 193 5 58 3 32 4 13 8 18 18 158 13 1 14 2 3 15 4 49 4 5 15 3 15 6 5,042,536 5,171,053 4,210,991 4,285,281 10 2,797,930 2,810,201
e? e? h? h? h? h? h? h? e??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee?? e??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??
リサーチペーパー
1 2 1 2 1 3 4 3 4 2 5 5 3 6 6 4 Real Estate Investment Trust Commercial Mortgage Backed Securities 7 8 I 9 10 (Property Trust) 7 8 9 10 5 Managed Investments Act Managed Investment Scheme Trustee Manager
野村資本市場研究所｜金融危機における米国FRBの金融政策－中央銀行の最後の貸し手機能－（PDF）
資本市場クォータリー 2009 Spring 特集ファイナンシャル セーフティネット : 金融危機への対応 金融危機における米国 FRB の金融政策 - 中央銀行の最後の貸し手機能 - 小立敬 要約 1. 1930 年代以来ともいわれる経済 金融危機に直面している米国では 最後の貸し手 (LLR) として FRB に積極かつ果敢な危機対応が求められている 特に 2008 年 9 月の リーマン ショック
アジアの資本移動の変化に関するクラスター分析 アジア域内の証券投資活性化に向けて
* ** 199 1 1996-97 relation * ** Seoul conference China and Emerging Asia: Reorganizing the Global Economy? held by KIEP and Seoul National University 26 5 11-12 Hugh Patrick Yung-Chul Park 26 9 9-1 East
untitled
BNP 2007 1 BNL 82 20.5 46 18.7 36 22.7 25 700 24.5 * 7.1 5.8 8.9 * 2007 5 4 BNP 2007 1 2007 1 82 1300 20.5 BNL 7.1 18.7 5.8 45 8600 1.8 1.3 22.7 36 2700 8.9 1 4400 2 6000 1 900 BNL 24.5 25 700 FRB 1 4.1
(2005a) (2005) (2004-2005) (2004) (2003) 3 (2003) (2003) 2
Offshore Software Outsourcing in Japan 1 2 3 4 5 1 2001 500 3 60 10 MD IT 2003 50 2004 236-7 BPO 1 100 2 (2000) (2001) (2001) (2004) (2005) (2005b) (2005) (2005) 1 (2005a) (2005) (2004-2005) (2004) (2003)
和RIM28_向山氏.indd
9ASEAN 23 2615.314.7EU 12.3 27.1 223 2638.1 M&A45.3 2.6 CIS97.5 2 ASEAN 26 RIM 28 Vol.8 No.28 13 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 8 9 14 RIM 28 Vol.8 No.28 ASEAN 2 28 GDP 15 2 199798 5 5 15 1997 98 99 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 World
2 4 8 UFJ24 1 14 24 UFJ 3 CS 32 IT 34 37 ALM 57 58 243 59 66 69 9 92 94 117 UFJ 117 UFJ 153 UFJ 29 259 264 215229
UFJ 24 2 4 8 UFJ24 1 14 24 UFJ 3 CS 32 IT 34 37 ALM 57 58 243 59 66 69 9 92 94 117 UFJ 117 UFJ 153 UFJ 29 259 264 215229 24UFJ 247 UFJ UFJ UFJ UFJ UFJ 22 3 23 3 24 3 UFJ UFJ 13,629 13,715 11,982 1,641
Jeffrey Sachs Chang(1998) Steven Radelet and Jeffrey Sachs (1998) 1999 IMF 1999 World Bank 1998 [ 1998 ] 2000 p [ 20
![Jeffrey Sachs Chang(1998) Steven Radelet and Jeffrey Sachs (1998) 1999 IMF 1999 World Bank 1998 [ 1998 ] 2000 p [ 20](/thumbs/88/117909888.jpg "Jeffrey Sachs Chang(1998) Steven Radelet and Jeffrey Sachs (1998) 1999 IMF 1999 World Bank 1998 [ 1998 ] 2000 p [ 20")
62 1997 1996 1 1 2 1 Jeffrey Sachs1997 2 Chang(1998)Steven Radelet and Jeffrey Sachs (1998) 1999 IMF 1999 World Bank1998 [ 1998 ] 2000p.9196 [ 2003] 21 [ 2002 2000] [ 1998 1999 ] 1 62 21 3 4 5 6 90 7 3
第3章 日本の対タンザニア援助の評価
46,500 km 2 1.1 67 2 60 20 150 105 10 35 1972 4 3 1998 1 2001 2005 3 9 20 12 100 2008 2006 12 2008 2005 11 Good Governance Plus 20 Dzongkhag201 Gewog1981 DYT1991 GYT2002 6 DYTGYT 10 Gup DYT DYT 2-1 2 50
表紙＿目次.PDF
JIL 2 1980 vol.3 15 3 1 3 15 18 IT 26 28 33 20 OECD 80 90 (1998) (2000) 2 Aghion et al. (1999) OECD 1970 1 2 70 1980 90 1.1 Kuznets U inverted U-shaped hypothesis GNP U 1 18901940 6 3 Kuznets(1955) (1963)
公務員倫理問題への新アプローチ
OECD CPI CPI CPI CPI CPI CPI / GDP / / / /.............................. Transparency International Corruption Perception Index CPI CPI 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
An Empirical Study of the Securities Firms' Dilemma on Financial Innovation through Diffusion of Internet Deals Yasugi Satoshi Bower, J. L., 1999, Disruptive technologies: Catching the wave,
HP 76
Sanno University Bulletin Vol.26 No. 1 September 2005 A Study on Discontinuing Service by the Government Housing Loan Corporation and the Activation of the Japanese Housing Loan Market Retail sections
untitled
2010 158 2010 159 2010 160 2010 161 2010 鍵 162 2010 163 2010 164 2010 165 2010 166 2010 167 2010 168 2010 169 2010 GDP(10 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 ASEAN10 CLMV 0 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 GDP(
Autumn EU 22 CD P RR 9 7 EU EU 2003 OECD 8 EU OECD OECD EC Included in Society 2003 EC OECD EU
138 Vol. 44 No. 2 はじめに 20 2008 5 2007 9 EU I 障害者政策の国際比較研究 1981 80 90 1990 ADA 1 1999 OAS 2 1996 CD P RR 3 EC 2003 2004 2010 1993 10 ESCAP 4 10 2003 BMF 5 BMF 2007 9 2001 2006 12 2008 5 2000 EU EC EU Autumn
Ł\”ƒ.eps
P1 P4 P2 P7 P8 Consolidated balance sheet Consolidated statement of income Consolidated statement of shareholders' equity Consolidated statement of cash flows 1 $5,644,73 262,387 146,72.27 8.2 11,436,433
伝統的な経済学では、「消費は重要ではあるが、気にしなくてもよい」と考えられてきた
2005 1 2004 SARS 2003 IMF 2004 5.0 2004 4.1 0.9 30 2005 2004 2005 2005 2005 2004 2005 IMF 2005 4.3 2004 IMF 2004 2003 3.0 4.3 2003 2 2003 2004 IT 2005 IMF 2005 2004 3.5 IT 1995 10 2.8% 10 2 1 IT IT 2004
Financial Reporting Standard 17 FRS17 FAS87 87 Financial Accounting Standard 87 FAS87 International Accounting Standard Board IASB 19 Internat
No,25-36(2005) Two Changes in Accounting Principles of Pension Plans British, or Americanthat is the question Masaharu Usuki Nihon University, Graduate School of Social and Cultural School, and NLI Research
(1) (2) (3) (4) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (1) (2) (3) (4) S&L (1) (2) (3) S&L (4) (5) (1) (2) (3) (4) (1) (2) 2 New York
S C B SHINKIN CENTRAL BANK 104-0031 3-8-1 TEL.03-3563-7541 FAX.03-3563-7551 http://www.scbri.jp/ FDIC New York 15-5 2004.2 (1) (2) (3) (4) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (1) (2) (3) (4) S&L (1)
AT A GLANCE INDIVIDUAL GROUP 63.72% 1, % At a Glance INSTITUTIONAL GROUP 34.26% % GLOBAL MARKETS GROUP 5.56% % 2
214 At a Glance 32 36 38 4 42 43 31 AT A GLANCE INDIVIDUAL GROUP 63.72% 1,293 32.4% 226 214 At a Glance INSTITUTIONAL GROUP 34.26% 695 76.26% 532 32 GLOBAL MARKETS GROUP 5.56% 112 4.2% 28 3 1% 1,5 5 1,
フィリピン No.02_ doc
2 2007 11 14 Bureau of Labor and Employment StatisticsBLES Labor Force SurveyLFS 3 2-1 15 ( ) 5,641 5,497 5,458 ( ) 3,640 3,562 3,523 (%) 64.5 64.8 64.6 ( ) 3,370 3,270 3,252 (%) 92.6 91.8 92.3 ( ) 269
野村資本市場研究所｜リバースモーゲージに求められる政府の役割－米国ホーム・エクイティ・コンバージョン・モーゲージ（HECM）誕生の経緯と意義－（PDF）
HECM 1. FHA HECM 1970 FHA 1989 HECM 2. HECM GSE HECM 3. HECM 2011 10 2010 65 2,925 65 23.1 65 4 83 2012 Summer 1 1 2009 99 8,507 2 68 6,422 2009 55.3 2009 70 60 3,000 2009 7 1 2 ILO 1 84 2 3 4 3 4 85 2012
Ishi
Ishi HPhttp: // www.mof.go.jp / jouhou / syuzei / siryou /.htm.. or ERTA, TRA ERTA Economic Recovery Tax Act TRA Tax Reform Act Mroz Triest Lindsey Burtless Navrati Lindsey Burtless Navrati CPS Current
( ( ( ( ( 2000 (% (% 5,458, ,296, ,427, ,349, ,050,446 8
( 1 2004 10 10 2000 1990 1980 50 281,421,906 248,709,873 226,545,805 48 279,583,437 247,051,601 225,179,263 626,932 550,043 401,851 1,211,537 1,108,229 964,691 57,291 46,773 32,297 154,805 133,152 105,979
実施計画メモ
1 ............... . e-japan e-japan2002. . PrivacyExchange http://www.privacyexchange.org/ Global Internet Liberty Campaign http://www.gilc.org/privacy/ survey/ Web.......1 PrivacyExchange http://www.privacyexchange.org/...2
付表 1 / Appendix table 1) 平成 30 年 中国際収支状況 速報 ) Balance of Payments Statistics, 2018 Preliminary) 1. サービス収支 1. Services 項目 単位 : 億円 ) 100 million yen) 前年
平成 30 年 中国際収支状況 速報 ) Balance of Payments Statistics, 2018 Preliminary) 国際収支状況 速報 ) Balance of Payments Preliminary) 単位 : 億円,%) 100 million yen,%) 項 目 前月 前年同月 Item 貿易 サービス収支 2,818-2,254 8,012 Goods & services
付表 1 / Appendix table 1) 平成 30 年 5 月中国際収支状況 速報 ) Balance of Payments Statistics, 2018 Preliminary) 1. サービス収支 1. Services 項目 単位 : 億円 ) 100 million yen)
平成 30 年 5 月中国際収支状況 速報 ) Balance of Payments Statistics, 2018 Preliminary) 国際収支状況 速報 ) Balance of Payments Preliminary) 単位 : 億円,%) 100 million yen,%) 項 目 5 月 前月 Previous month 前年同月 Item 貿易 サービス収支 - 2,616
Non-Deliverable Forwards NDF BIS BIS
Some Features of Foreign Exchange Markets in April OKUDA, Hiroshi On September,, BIS and many Central Banks published surveys of foreign exchange activities that occurred in April. By analyzing these surveys,
商学論叢 第62巻 第1号
JPMorgan Chase & Co. JPMorgan Chase & Co. 1) 1) Citigroup 1 Citigroup, Inc. 61 4 2017 3 JPMorgan Chase & Co. Chemical Banking Corp. Manufacturers Hanover Corp. The Chase Manhattan Corp. The Chase Manhattan
SNAと家計調査における貯蓄率の乖離－日本の貯蓄率低下の要因－
RIETI Discussion Paper Series 10-J-003 RIETI Discussion Paper Series 10-J-003 2009 年 12 月 SNA と家計調査における貯蓄率の乖離 - 日本の貯蓄率低下の要因 - 宇南山卓 ( 神戸大学大学院経済学研究科 ) 要 旨 SNA と家計調査から計算される家計貯蓄率の乖離の原因を明らかにし 日本の貯蓄率の低下の原因を考察した
国際比較からみた介護システムの役割分担
* OECDLong-term Care for Older People E-mail: lfy@hotmail.co.jp Long-term care Long-term care for older people OECDLTC GDP. OECD WHOHealth life expectancy : HALE GDP Martins et al OECD OECD OECD Residential
目次 1. 安定成長を続ける経済 2. 顕在化した不動産市況悪化の影響 住宅問題とニュータウン開発 本格化する政府の対策と今後のリスク 1 2 結びに代えて RIM 211 Vol.11 No.41
韓国の不動産市況悪化と政府の対応 要 旨 調査部環太平洋戦略研究センター 上席主任研究員 向山英彦 21 6.2 25 9 2 21 211 211.52 23 2.12.6 21 11 RIM 211 Vol.11 No.41 1 目次 1. 安定成長を続ける経済 2. 顕在化した不動産市況悪化の影響 1 2 3. 住宅問題とニュータウン開発 1 2 3 4. 本格化する政府の対策と今後のリスク
CP BBB A 3 1
CP BBB A 3 1 ...1...2...3...4... 4... 7... 7... 10... 13...15... 15... 15... 19... 23... 31... 31... 32... 34... 34... 34...37... 37... 37... 38...40...41...42 2 1 2 1 2 1990 2001 2002 3 3 (%) 1970 1980
1990年代以降の日本の経済変動
1990 * kenichi.sakura@boj.or.jp ** hitoshi.sasaki@boj.or.jp *** masahiro.higo@boj.or.jp No.05-J-10 2005 12 103-8660 30 * ** *** 1990 2005 12 1990 1990 1990 2005 11 2425 BIS E-mail: kenichi.sakura@boj.or.jp
評論・社会科学 ９０号（よこ）（Ｐ）／４．咸
1 2008 7 1 1 4 5 1 1998 2003 2005 3 2 2008 7 1 2009 7 30 2009 11 18 2009 2009 2008 1 1 1 1 65 1970 3.1 2000 7.2 7 2008 10.7 14 2018 1 2 1985 41.92008 50.0 2004 15 59 2003 2010 79 2020 114 OECD 1 65 2006
Winter 図 1 図 OECD OECD OECD OECD 2003
266 Vol. 44 No. 3 I 序論 Mirrlees 1971 Diamond 1998 Saez 2002 Kaplow 2008 1 700 900 1, 300 1, 700 II III IV V II わが国の再分配の状況と国際比較 OECD Forster and Mira d Ercole 2005 2006 2001 Winter 08 267 図 1 図 2 2000 2
untitled
2007.4 No.672 CONTENTS 1 3 21 FOMC FRB FF 5.25 1 FF 5.01 25bp 3 5.01 FF 4.58 2 FF 1 7 10 2 2 FF FF 10 2 () (bp 5.2 FF6 5.4 10 5.0 5.2 4.8 5.0 30 20 4.6 4.8 10 2 4.4 4.6 FF 0-10 4.4 FF12-20 10 2 () -30
( 2 ) (UAE) UAE UAE UAE 4,621, UAE 824, ,279,774 ( ) % 484, , % 2,663, ,672 6
(UAE UAE UAE UAE 4,621,399 2005 20.1 UAE 824, 921 79.9 3,279,774 (2008 7 0 14 20.5% 484,102 462,405 1564 78.6% 2,663,702 970,672 65 0.9% 26,244 14,274 1564 73.9% (2008 014 1564 65 15 65 2005 UNDP UAE 1995
The current state of Japanese Tourism considered from Travel & Tourism Competitiveness MITSUKI Takehiro Tourism is expected to be the growth industry
The current state of Japanese Tourism considered from Travel & Tourism Competitiveness MITSUKI Takehiro Tourism is expected to be the growth industry in the 21 st century. The Japanese government thinks