Jpn J Psychosom Med 57: , 2017 Ji, Ji Cronbach Ji Key words Ji SDS 1 Ji Ji Appendix

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "Jpn J Psychosom Med 57: , 2017 Ji, Ji Cronbach Ji Key words Ji SDS 1 Ji Ji Appendix"

いとはこやぎ
5 years ago
Views:

1 Jpn J Psychosom Med 57: , 2017 Ji, Ji Cronbach Ji Key words Ji SDS 1 Ji Ji Appendix Vol. 57 No

2 Gold Standard Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression HAM D Vol. 57 No , Ji Ji 2 Ji WHO 10 ICD

3 Self rating Depression Scale SDSSDS Zung Ji 5 Ji 9 Cronbach Intraclass Correlation Coefficient ICC SDS Spearman ROC SDS ROC AUC Area Under the Curve I T r 0.25 r 0.7 promax Pearson 5 SPSS 6 1 Ji n n promax 9Table Ji Cronbach Ji Intraclass Correlation Coefficient ICC p a Ji 30 9 ICD 10 Table 1 Ji Fig. 946 Vol. 57 No

4 Table 1 Factor loadings Items Factor 1 Factor 2 Factor 3 Factor 4 Factor 5 Factor 6 Factor 7 Factor 8 Factor 9 h 2 Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q variance b I T r 0.25 Table 2 c Pearson Vol. 57 No Table 3 2 Ji SDS Spearman Table 4 947

5 number of patients Ji test score Fig. 1 Distribution of total score Ji test Table 2 Item Total Correlation Analysis Items I T Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Vol. 57 No

6 Table 3 Factor 1 Factor 2 Factor 3 Factor 4 Factor 5 Factor 6 Factor 7 Factor 8 Factor 9 Total Factor 1 1 Factor Factor Factor Factor Factor Factor Factor Factor Total Table 4 Correlation coefficients between SDS and Ji test Depression Spearman not depressed mild moderate severe Table 5 Setting of cut off point Ji test Cut off point Sensitivity Specificity mild moderate severe SDS 1.0 ROC Ji SDS AUC 0.8 Ji AUC p SDS AUC p Ji Sensitivity Ji test SDS AUC Fig Ji test 0.0 SDS Specificity Fig. 2 Area Under the Curve 4 Ji ROC Table 5 Vol. 57 No AUC AUC AUC High accuracy Moderate accuracy Low accuracy 1 Ji 9 Cronbach ICC ICD 10 Ji 9 Table 1 SDS 949

7 2 SDS SDS 19 Sakamoto ,187 SDS SDS 21 SDS 3 22 SDS 23 SDS Ji 1 1 ROC Ji SDS ROC AUC high accuracy Ji SDS Ji 3 Ji 1 SDS 2 ICD 10 global standard 3 Ji Vol. 57 No

8 Ji 5 Ji Ji high convenient 6 2 Ji Ji Ji 2 Ji http: toukei index.htm 4 pp Conwell Y, Duberstein PR, Cox C, et al Relationship of age and Axis I diagnoses in victims of completed suicide A psychological autopsy study. Am J Psychiatry , Isometsä E, Heikkinen M, Henriksson M, et al Suicide in non major depressions. J Affect Disord , Nakao M, Takeuchi T The suicide epidemic in Japan and strategies of depression screening for its prevention. Bull World Health Organ , Oyama H, Sakashita T, Ono Y, et al Effect of community based intervention using depression Vol. 57 No

9 screening on elderly suicide risk A meta analysis of the evidence from Japan. Community Ment Health J , pp Cusin C, Yang H, Yeung A, et al Rating Scales for Depression. In Baer L, Blais MA eds Handbook of Clinical Rating Scales and Assessment in Psychiatry and Mental Health. Humana Press, New York, pp7 35, bunya roudoukijun anzeneisei12 pdf pdf mhlw.go.jp bunya roudoukijun anzeneisei12 pdf pdf mhlw.go.jp houdou h html Suppl Suppl Suppl mhlw.go.jp toukei list h html Sakamoto S, Kijima N, Tomoda A, et al Factor structure of the Zung self rating depression scale SDS for Undergraduates. J Clin Psychol , Zung WWK A Self rating depression scale. Arch Gen Psychiatry , SDS Vol. 57 No

10 Appendix Self Rating Questionnaire for Depression Ji test Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Vol. 57 No

11 Abstract Development of Self Rating Questionnaire for Depression Ji test First Report Statistical Analysis and Prospects for the Stress Check Program Hideki Ito, Medical Corporation Senjukai Ito Clinic Mailing Address Hideki Ito, Hirano honmachi, Hirano ku, Osaka shi, Osaka , Japan Medical Corporation Senjukai International Psychosomatic Laboratory Objective The purpose of this study is to develop the high quality and reliable questionnaire Self rating questionnaire for depression Ji test in order to use conveniently in a general outpatient. Methods Among depressive symptoms, the typical symptoms were selected as 9 subscales, which were persistent sadness or low mood, loss of interests or pleasure, fatigue or low energy, existence, suicidal thoughts or acts, anxiety, low thoughts, low attention and poor concentration, somatization, and disturbed sleep. We judged the symptoms in each item as dairy life disorder and carried out a statistical analysis on the basis of a comprehensive indicator of the total score 0 to 90 points by the respondents in the 4 methods. Results 91 new patients participated in this study. Their average age was 45.3, male and female ratio was 27 male 64 female, the average score was 40.0 points. Cronbach coefficient was Conclusions The comparison with SDS revealed that a correlation coefficient between Ji test and SDS was very strong, reliability and validity of Ji test was sufficiently high. Also, the comparison with a comprehensive evaluation in clinical diagnosis revealed sufficient reliability of Ji test. Currently, from the point of view of prospects for the Stress Check Program that has been performed, we would like to report upon the present study in detail with deep consideration. Key words Ji test, depression rating scale, stress check, SDS Received May 31, 2016 accepted February 7, Vol. 57 No

272 11) 12) 1 Barrera 13) 1fl social embeddedness 2fl perceived support 3fl enacted support 3 14) 15) 3 2fl 13) 16;17) 1 14;15;18 21) 2 22;23) 4 24;25

Vol. 13 No. 2 2003 271 281 I Λ1 Λ2 I 162 II 286 3 4 1 > 2 3 1) 13 11 36 1 275 1 7 21 2;3) 17 4 6) 7;8) 9) 10) Λ1 Λ2 701-0193 288 271 272 11) 12) 1 Barrera 13) 1fl social embeddedness 2fl perceived support