指数から読み解く日本の政策不確実性の特徴
|
|
- さいぞう むらかわ
- 4 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 RIETI BBL
2 ???
3
4 Brexit
5 1987
6 1987
7 THE QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS Vol. 131 November 2016 Issue 4 MEASURING ECONOMIC POLICY UNCERTAINTY SCOTT R. BAKER NICHOLAS BLOOM STEVEN J. DAVIS We develop a new index of economic policy uncertainty (EPU) based on newspaper coverage frequency. Several types of evidence including human readings of 12,000 newspaper articles indicate that our index proxies for movements in policy-related economic uncertainty. Our U.S. index spikes near tight presidential elections, Gulf Wars I and II, the 9/11 attacks, the failure of Lehman Brothers, the 2011 debt ceiling dispute, and other major battles over fiscal policy. Using firm-level data, we find that policy uncertainty is associated with greater stock price volatility and reduced investment and employment in policy-sensitive sectors like defense, health care, finance, and infrastructure construction. At the macro level, innovations in policy uncertainty foreshadow declines in investment, output, and employment in the United States and, in a panel vector autoregressive setting, for 12 major economies. Extending our U.S. index back to 1900, EPU rose dramatically in the 1930s (from late 1931) and has drifted upward since the 1960s. JEL Codes: D80, E22, E66, G18, L50.
8 ??
9 10 1 ECONOMY: {economy or economic} POLICY: {deficit or regulation or legislation or congress or white house or federal reserve } UNCERTAINTY: {uncertainty or uncertain} 12, ,000
10 15 president, senate, house of representives, white house, congress, federal reserve etc. regulation, legislation, budget, spending, deficit, tax etc =100
11 Figure 5: Human and Computer EPU Indices Economic Policy Uncertainty Index Computer Correlation=0.86 Human (+ symbol) Year Source: Baker, Bloom, and Davis (2016)
12 1 E: { or } P: { or or or or or or or or or or or or or or or or or or or or or or or or or or or or or or or } U: { or or or }
13 E U P =100
14 E P U : { or or or or or or or or or or etc.} : { or or or or or or or or or etc.} : { or or 301 or GATT or WTO or or or or or TPP or EPA or FTA etc.} Policy Uncertainty in Japan IMF Working Paper No.17/128
15 1987
16 , , = , ½¼º¼ -¼,, ¼¼º¼,,,, º¼ -¼ ¼½º¼¾-¼ ½½º¼,,,, º½½-½¾, ¼ º¼ -½¼ ½¾º¼,, Í,, ¼½º¼ º¼ ½ º¼ -¼, ½ º¼½-¼¾, ¼ º¼ ½ º½½, º½¼ ½ º¼½, ¼ º¼¾, ¼¾º½¼ Source:
17 , , = ¾¼¼¼ ½ ¾,,,, ¾¼½¼ Í ¾¼½ Source:
18
19 , , = この指数は次の18カ国の指数をGDP にもとづくウェイトで加重平均により算出米国, カナダ, ブラジル, チリ, 英国, ドイツ, イタリア, スペイン, フランス, オランダ, ロシア, インド, 中国, 韓国, 日本, アイルランド, スウェーデン, オーストラリア Í,, Source:
20 GFC GFC GFC
21 ½¾, %
22 1987
23 VAR TOPIX 5 6 IRF
24 IRF, %, %
25 IRF, % Πʹ Πʹ ÎÁ Πʹ =½¾ = ÈÍ Á Πʹ¾
26 Brexit
27 Back-up
28 , = , ¼½º¼¾-¼, ½¼º¼ -¼ ¼½º¼, ¼¼º¼,, ½½º¼ º¼ ¼¾º½¼, º¼, ¼ º¼, ½¾º¼ º½½-½¾, ¼ º¼ -½¼, Í º¼, ½ º¼ -¼, ¼ º¼ º½¼, ¼ º¼½ ¼ º¼¾ Source:
29 , = Source:
30 , = , ¼¾º¼ -½¼ ½¼º¼ ¼¾º¼¾ Ë ÊË, ¼½º¼¾-¼,,, ½½º¼ ¼ º¼ º½¼ º¼, ¼ º½¼ ½ º¼½-¼¾ º½½, ¼ º¼ º¼, Í, ¾º¼, ½ º¼ -¼,,, º½¼ ¼ º¼ ½ º½½ Source:
31 , = ÌÈÈ, ÌÈÈ ½ º¼½ Í ÌÈÈ, ½ º¼ ½ º½¼ ÌÈÈ, ½ º¼ ½ º¼½ ÌÈÈ ½ º½¼ ÌÈÈ ½ º¼ ÌÈÈ, ½ ÌÈÈ ½¾º½½-½¾ ½ º½½ ¼½ º¼ ÌÈÈ ½½º½½ º½¾ ÌÈÈ ½½º¼½ º¼ ÌÈÈ, º¼½ ½¼º½½ ¼ º¼¾ ½ º¼ Source:
32 IV ÎÁ ¼º ¼ Source:
33 IV ÎÁ ¼º Source:
わが国における政策の不確実性
RIETI Policy Discussion Paper Series 17-P-019 RIETI Policy Discussion Paper Series 17-P-019 2017 年 6 月 わが国における政策の不確実性 1 伊藤新経済産業研究所 要 旨 本稿では Arbatli et al. (2017) が作ったわが国における 1987 年 1 月以降の政策不確実性指数について解説する
More informationinyectiva.dvi
ÙÒ ÓÒ ÁÒÝ Ø Ú Ó Ö Ý Ø Ú Ý Ø Ú ÒÚ Ö ÂÙÐ Ó Ö ½ Ñ ÝÓ ¾¼½ ÁÒÝ Ø Ú Ó Ö Ý Ø Ú Ý Ý Ø Ú ÁÒÝ Ø Ú Ò Ò ½ ÙÒ Ò ÁÒÝ Ø Ú µ ÍÒ ÙÒ Ò f ÒÝ Ø Ú Ó ÙÒ Ú Ð ÒØ Ð Ñ ÒØÓ Ø ÒØÓ Ð ÓÑ Ò Ó Ø Ò Ò Ñ Ò Ø ÒØ Ö f : A B ÒÝ Ø Ú x 1,x 2
More information¹ ØÙ Ò ØÙÖ Þ º Ð Þ Å Ö Å Ü Ñ ºµ Å ÖÕÙ Ú Ø Ð ÙÑ µº ÖÙØ º ÙÚ Ö À Ø ÓÖ Æ ØÙÖ Ð Ó Å Ñ ÖÓ Ô º ¹ ¼µ ź ÔÓÔÙÐ Ó ÙÑ Ó Ñ Ô Ö Ó Ó ÑÓ Ë º º ÙÑ Ñ Ð Ô Ó ÕÙ ÒØ ÒØÖ
¹ ØÙ ÒØÙÖÞº ÐÞ ÅÖ ÅÜÑ ºµ ÅÖÕÙ ÚØ ÐÙÑ µº ÖÙØ º ÙÚÖ À ØÓÖ ÆØÙÖÐ Ó ÅÑÖÓ Ôº ¹¼µ ź ÔÓÔÙÐÓ ÙÑ Ó Ñ ÔÖ Ó Ó ÑÓ Ë º º ÙÑ ÑÐ Ô Ó ÕÙÒØ ÒØÖ Ð ÙÑØ ÙÑ ÜÑ º ¾ ½ ËÊ ÀÍÅÆ ÎÌÊÁÆ ½ ÐÑÒØÓ ÒØÙÖÐ Ó Ö ÙÑÒÓ Ú¹ ØÖÒ ÉÙÖ Ö Ó ¹ ØÙ
More informationmain.dvi
ß ß È ÆÓÒØ ÖÑ Ð «Ø Ó Å ÖÓÛ Ú ÁÖÖ Ø ÓÒ ÓÒ ÐÓÖ Ò Ø ÓÒ ÈÖÓ Ó È ¾¼½¼ ¾ ¼ ¾ È ÈÓÐÝ ÐÓÖ Ò Ø Ô ÒÝÐ ¾º ÀÞµ È È È» È ¹ÁÈ ÁÈ ¾¼± È ¼ÀÞ È È ÅÎ»Ñ È ½ ½ ½º½ ½º¾ ¾ ¾º½ ¾º¾ ¾º ¾º ¾º½º½ ¾º½º¾ ¾º¾º½ ¾º¾º¾ ¾º¾º ¾º¾º ¾º
More informationË ¾¼½¼ µ Ä Ä Ý Þ Ü ¾¼¼ ÁÁ ÁË µ ÁÊ ÓÙÒ Ø ÓÒ ÁÒØ ÖÒ Ð Ê Ø Ò ¹ ÔÔÖÓ µ ÁÊ Ú Ò ÁÒØ ÖÒ Ð Ê Ø Ò ¹ ÔÔÖÓ µ ÊÊ Ê ÓÚ ÖÝ Ê Ø µ Ä ÄÓ Ú Ò ÙÐص Ä ÜÔ Ø ÄÓ µ Ä ÄÓ Ú Ò
Ë ¾¼½¼ µ ÄÄ Ý Þ Ü ¾¼¼ ÁÁ ÁË µ ÁÊ ÓÙÒØÓÒ ÁÒØÖÒÐ ÊØÒ ¹ ÔÔÖÓµ ÁÊ ÚÒ ÁÒØÖÒÐ ÊØÒ ¹ ÔÔÖÓµ ÊÊ ÊÓÚÖÝ Êص Ä ÄÓ ÚÒ ÙÐص Ä ÜÔØ ÄÓ µ Ä ÄÓ ÚÒ ÙÐØµÄ ÜÔØ ÄÓ µ ÍÂ Ý ¹ÑÐÑÙÖ ÑÔµ Þ ¹ÑÐÝÑ Ø ÑÔµ Ü ¹ÑÐÙ ÑÔµ - 174 - ½ ½½ ÁÁ
More information高齢化とマクロ投資比率―国際パネルデータを用いた分析―
196 2017 * ** ** ** ** 160 2 2 JEL Classification Codes E21, E22, J11 Keywords * ESRI 28 ESRI 29 3 17 ESRI ** 115 196 Population Aging and Domestic Investment An Analysis Using International Panel Data
More informationIT ASG 22
2004 26 ASG 2004 4 1 2 1 3 2003 9 3 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 9 11 12 13 13 2 14 IT 14 15 16 17 3 18 18 18 19 20 20 21 ASG 22 1 ASG 9.6 478 ASG 20 499 1 2 3 2004 4 ASG Grant Thornton ASG Tel 03-3595-0304 Fax 03-3595-0395
More informationito.dvi
1 2 1006 214 542 160 120 160 1 1916 49 1710 55 1716 1 2 1995 1 2 3 4 2 3 1950 1973 1969 1989 1 4 3 3.1 3.1.1 1989 2 3.1.2 214 542 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
More informationfunkanal.dvi
ÙÒÓÒÐÒÐÞ ÅØÓÐ ÌÑ ÐÐÓ ÐÔÒ ĐÓ ÞÐÐØÓØØ ÄÙ ÖÔ ¾¼¼ º ÔÖÐ ¾½º ÌÖØÐÓÑÝÞ ½º ÙÒÓÒÐÒÐÞ ÐÔÚØÐÓ ØÖÙØÙÖ ½ ½º½º ÄÒÖ ÐØÖ ÞÖØ ÐÒÖ ÐØÖ º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º ½ ½º¾º ÌÓÔÓÐÓÙ
More informationعËÐ ÙØ ÓÒ ÖÙ Ø Ã ÓÖÙ ÃÙÖÓ Û Ò Ï Ç Ø Á Ö ÍÒ Ú Ö ØÝ ¹½¾¹½ Æ Ò ÖÙ Û À Ø Á Ö ½ ¹ ½½ Â Ô Ò ÙÖÓ Û º Ö º º Ô ÌÓ ÝÓ ÁÒ Ø ØÙØ Ó Ì ÒÓÐÓ Ý ¾ß½¾ß½ Ç¹Ó Ý Ñ Å ÙÖÓ¹
عËÐ ÙØÓÒ ÖÙØ ÃÓÖÙ ÃÙÖÓ Û Ò Ï ÇØ ÁÖ ÍÒÚÖ ØÝ ¹½¾¹½ ÆÒÖÙ Û ÀØ ÁÖ ½¹½½ ÂÔÒ ÙÖÓ Û ºÖººÔ ÌÓÝÓ ÁÒ ØØÙØ Ó ÌÒÓÐÓÝ ¾ß½¾ß½ ǹÓÝÑ ÅÙÖÓ¹Ù ÌÓÝÓ ½¾ß¾ ÂÔÒº Û ºØغºÔ ØÖØ ÁÒ Ø ÔÔÖ Û ÒØÖÓ٠ع Ð ÔÔÖÓ ÓÖ ÙØÓÒ Ò ÔÖ ÒØ ÑÓÖ
More information<96D889BA904D2E696E6464>
615 379 1 1995 10 OECD 1995 380 616 57 3 1993 4 3071 2003 1 3247 10 10 4 1 1990 2000 2003 10 617 381 2002 2 3 4 5 2 1 1990 1995 1995 12 1995 IPP Independent Power Producer 1 2004a, b 2005a, b 382 618 57
More information物価変動の決定要因について ― 需給ギャップと物価変動の関係の国際比較を中心に―
NAIRU NAIRU NAIRU GDPGDP NAIRUNon- Accelerating Inflation Rate of Unemployment GDP GDP NAIRU Lown and RichFisher, Mahadeva and Whitley raw materials G NAIRUTurnerFai WatanabeNAIRU Watanabe nested NAIRU
More informationÒ Ö Ø Ñ Ø ÖÓÙÔ ÔÔ Ö Ò Ò Ø ÓÙÖ Ö¹ÅÙ ØÖ Ò ÓÖÑ ÓÒ Ø Ð Ò ÙÖ µ ¾¼½¼ ½¼
Ò ÖØÑØ ÖÓÙÔ ÔÔÖÒ Ò Ø ÓÙÖÖ¹ÅÙ ØÖÒ ÓÖÑ ÓÒ Ø ÐÒ ÙÖ µ ¾¼½¼½¼ ÓÙÖÖ¹ Ð ÀÐÖØ ¾¾ ÖÚ¼¼¼ ËѹÓÑÓÒÓÙ Ú ÓÙÖÖ¹ÅÙ ØÖÒ ÓÖÑ Ò ÑÓÙÐ Ó ØÐ Ú ÓÒ ÐÒ ÙÖ µ ¾» ¾ ¼ ¼¹½ ¼¹ ¼¹¾ ÓÙÖÖ¹ ½ Ð Ð ½¹¾ Ð ½¹ ½¹½ ¾ ¾¹¾ ¾¹½ о¹ ¾¹ ÅÌ ÅÌ ¹½
More information-October TPP ASEAN RCEP TPP MV Islamic State, IS EU EU EU EU EU
AIIB BRICS TPP ASEAN ARF -October TPP ASEAN RCEP TPP MV Islamic State, IS EU EU EU EU EU EU EU UK MDGs AIIB BRICS ADB IT -October IoT Internet of Things Wearable AI IoT. GE IIC Finance+Technolpgy STEM
More informationmain.dvi
ÇÒ ÁÒÒÖ Ø Ù ÁÖ ½ Ò ÒÑÒ º ÈÖ ¾ ¾ ½ ÔÖØÑÒØ Ó ÁÒÓÖÑØÓÒ ËÒ ÍÒÚÖ ØÝ Ó ÌÓÝÓ ¹ ¹½ ÀÓÒÓ ÙÒÝÓ¹Ù ÌÓÝÓ ½½ ¹¼¼ ÂÔÒ Ö º ºÙ¹ØÓÝÓººÔ ÔÖØÑÒØ Ó ÓÑÔÙØÖ ² ÁÒÓÖÑØÓÒ ËÒ ÍÒÚÖ ØÝ Ó ÈÒÒ ÝÚÒ ¾¼¼ ËÓÙØ Ö Ëغ ÈÔ È ½½¼ ÍË ÔÖ ºÙÔÒÒºÙ
More information地方債と地方財政規律
* 1990 GDP 40 JEL Classification: H39, H54, H63, H72, H77 Key words: * 16 (2005a, b) 1 Local Government Bonds and Fiscal Discipline By Takero Doi, Tomoko Hayashi and Nobuyuki Suzuki Abstract Outstanding
More information1990年代以降の日本の経済変動
1990 * kenichi.sakura@boj.or.jp ** hitoshi.sasaki@boj.or.jp *** masahiro.higo@boj.or.jp No.05-J-10 2005 12 103-8660 30 * ** *** 1990 2005 12 1990 1990 1990 2005 11 2425 BIS E-mail: kenichi.sakura@boj.or.jp
More information43 2 PD DR Sommar and Shahnazarianka [19] Simons and Rolwes [17] GDP Figlewski, Frydman and Liang [7] GDP Bonfim [2] 3 Bhattacharjee et al. [1] 2002 [
Transactions of the Operations Research Society of Japan Vol. 55, 2012, pp. 42 65 c ( 2011 10 25 ; 2012 3 1 ) ( PD) ( DR) 2007 DR PD 54 PD DR 0.72% PD :,,,,, 1. 1 ( PD: Probability of Default) 10 ( DR:
More informationXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Å E D Ë@ÌÊè½ÌÄ\ { î{ t½ î. î G } b } b ÏäÝßØo 9 "Ä ¾ iž ¾ ¼ÀÀ Ð ÏäÝßØo 9 "Ä ¾ iž ¾ ¼ÀÀ Ð z z Þ Þ ÏäÝßØo : " ¾ ~C iž ò 0@ÀÀ Ð ÏäÝßØo : " ¾ ~C iž ò 0@ÀÀ Ð ÏäÝßØo ; " v ¼ÀÀ Ð ÏäÝßØo ; " v ¼ÀÀ Ð z z z z Þ
More informationWinter 図 1 図 OECD OECD OECD OECD 2003
266 Vol. 44 No. 3 I 序論 Mirrlees 1971 Diamond 1998 Saez 2002 Kaplow 2008 1 700 900 1, 300 1, 700 II III IV V II わが国の再分配の状況と国際比較 OECD Forster and Mira d Ercole 2005 2006 2001 Winter 08 267 図 1 図 2 2000 2
More information中国引き締め策の対外的影響
ito@nli-research.co.jp 2 2003 2004 9.8 47.8 10.7 84.3 3 1 1 4 5 9.6 9.8 47.8 28.6 84 60.2 30.2 7.5 SARS 15.4 338.83 11.9 726.97 42.7 SARS 10.7 12.8 ( ) 10.9 16.1 1997 6 8.7 11.9 20.7 21.6 16.2 17 7 15.3
More information74-2 岩間
128 74 2 21 3 128 134 Journal of the Japanese Association for Petroleum Technology Vol. 74, No. 2 March, 2009 pp. 128 134 Lecture * ** Received February 23, 2009 accepted February 26, 2009 The impact of
More information公的年金制度の考え方と抜本改革の方向性.pdf
9 8 1 (1) (9-1-1) (9-1-2) ( ) 9-1-1 9-1-3 1997 ( 9) 97 70 97 70 ( ) 60 60 15 60 97 70 60 ( 15 ) 2 5 3 60 9-1-2 GNP 40 147 60 1 9-1-2 60 60 40 (9-1-3) (9-1-4) ( ) 9-1-3 30 40 9-1-4 60 30 40 (9-1-5) (9-1-6)
More information..,,,, , ( ) 3.,., 3.,., 500, 233.,, 3,,.,, i
25 Feature Selection for Prediction of Stock Price Time Series 1140357 2014 2 28 ..,,,,. 2013 1 1 12 31, ( ) 3.,., 3.,., 500, 233.,, 3,,.,, i Abstract Feature Selection for Prediction of Stock Price Time
More information2017 年訪日外客数 ( 総数 ) 出典 : 日本政府観光局 (JNTO) 総数 2,295, ,035, ,205, ,578, ,294, ,346, ,681, ,477
2018 年訪日外客数 ( 総数 ) 出典 : 日本政府観光局 (JNTO) 総数 2,501,409 9.0 2,509,297 23.3 2,607,956 18.2 2,900,718 12.5 2,675,052 16.6 2,704,631 15.3 2,832,040 5.6 2,578,021 4.1 2,159,600-5.3 2,640,600 1.8 26,109,300 9.7
More information国民 1 人当たり GDP (OECD 加盟国 ) ( 付表 2)OECD 加盟国の国民 1 人当たりGDP(2002~2009 年 ) 2002 年 2003 年 2004 年 2005 年 1 ルクセンブルク 58,709 ルクセンブルク 59,951 ルクセンブルク 64,016 ルクセンブル
国民 1 人当たり GDP (OECD 加盟国 ) ( 付表 1)OECD 加盟国の国民 1 人当たりGDP(1970 年 1975 年 1980 年 1985 年 1990 年 1995 年 2000 年 2001 年 ) 1970 年 1975 年 1980 年 1985 年 1 スイス 7,160 スイス 10,041 スイス 15,492 スイス 21,046 2 ルクセンブルク 5,447
More informationIMES Discussion Paper Series 98-J
IMES DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES Discuss ssion Paper No. 98-J-1 INSTITUTE FOR MONETARY AND ECONOMIC STUDIES BANK OF JAPAN IMES Discussion Paper Series 98-J-1 1998 1 E-mail: tokiko.shimizu@boj.or.jp 1. 1.1.
More information,.,,.,. NIRA,.,.,,, GDP.,., 1%, 2.0% 3).,,.,,., 1, 4).,,.,, GDP,.,,.,,,.,,., 2002.,,., 3), Q&A Q16 (http://www.stat.go.jp/data/kakei/qa-1.ht
1, 1, 2011 4 3-28,,.,,.,.,,.,,.,,.,.,. 1., 1), 1946.,, GDP,.,,,.,,., (2008) ( NIRA ), 23,.,,, 2).,,,.,,.,,., 657-8501 2-1, E-mail: unayama@person.kobe-u.ac.jp 1) 1. 2), 1990 2 21, 1993 6 12. 3 1 1 2011
More information産業・企業レベルデータで見た日本の経済成長.pdf
2003 11 10 IT IT JIP JCER ) 2003 CD-ROM http://www.esri.go.jp/jp/archive/bun/bun170/170index. html 1 JIP Jorgenson, Mun, andstiroh (2002) GDP 2 3 1951 1954 1957 1960 1963 1966 1969 1972 1975 1978 1981
More informationTomorrow Next th draft version MEW SWET
Research Center for Price Dynamics A Research Project Concerning Prices and Household Behaviors Based on Micro Transaction Data Working Paper Series No.7 Tomorrow Next を用いた金融政策の分析 青野幸平 June 14, 2012 4th
More informationPreface Arnak Dalalyan Elmar Vogt
ISSN 1341-6278 18 Annual Report 2006 Graduate School of Mathematical Sciences The University of Tokyo Preface 2006 2006 130 2006 4 9 Arnak Dalalyan 10 2007 4 Elmar Vogt 19 2007 6 18 1. 21 COE 21 COE (PDF)
More information首都直下地震における地方財政への影響
ESRI Discussion Paper Series No.241 首都直下地震における地方財政への影響 宮崎毅 August 2010 内閣府経済社会総合研究所 Economic and Social Research Institute Cabinet Office Tokyo, Japan ESRI ディスカッション ペーパー シリーズは 内閣府経済社会総合研究所の研究者および外部研究者によって行われた研究成果をとりまとめたものです
More information2-栗原.TXT
NAOSITE: Nagasaki University's Ac Title カジノ税に関する一考察 Author(s) 栗原, 克文 Citation 經營と經濟, vol.89(1), pp.17-34; 2009 Issue Date 2009-06 URL http://hdl.handle.net/10069/23392 Right This document is downloaded
More information2 2 1 (LOOKUP ) VLOOKUP(HLOOKUP) JR () 1 2 (S101.xlsx() 1 3 (1) C2) (2) (C3) (3) 2 (C4,C5) (4) (C6,C7) 1.1 (C6) C5 4 C6 C
2 1 2 (lookup ) (1) LOOKUP (2) (ROUNDUP,ABS (3) (4) (5) 2 2 1 (LOOKUP ) VLOOKUP(HLOOKUP) JR () 1 2 (S101.xlsx() 1 3 (1) C2) (2) (C3) (3) 2 (C4,C5) (4) (C6,C7) 1.1 (C6) C5 4 C6 C5 4 4 4 154 154 !"#$ % &'()*
More information参考:労働統計機関一覧|データブック国際労働比較2018|JILPT
労働統計機関一覧 ( 注 ) 掲載機関の都合によりURLが変更される場合がある 最新の各国労働統計機関のリンク集については, 労働政策研究 研修機構ウェブサイト (http://www.jil.go.jp/foreign/ link/) を参照されたい ------------------------- 国際機関等 ------------------------ 国際労働機関 (ILO) International
More information5 50 2 70 50 70 5 50 5 2 1 50 70 1 50 70 1 10 30 45 45 2 1 20 1 50 20 50 6 22 50 1 2 6 22 50 1 10 40 3 1980 50 50 1 1.3 10 16 50 1 50 2015 50 3 Win-Win 1 1 NEAR MBC 50 4 60 MBC 9 2 9 19 1 50 50 1 2 10
More information- March IMF IMF IMF ITO The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade
M&A IMF IMF gold tranche - March IMF IMF IMF ITO The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade IMF IMF IMF GATT OECD OECD BITs. - March. U I = I (r m, i, Z * r m i Z * (= Z / Z) I / r m > I / i < I / Z *
More informationThe Japanese economy in FY2015 suffered from sluggish growth in individual consumption, while the foreign exchange market remained unstable with high volatility. Even in such an economic environment, MSF
More informationGDPギャップと潜在成長率
2003 output gap 80 1 20 90 20 70 2 1 2 output gap potential output 1 2 (2001) 3 potential rate of growth 2000 Meyer (2000) European Central Bank: (1999b) 2002 10 4 3 (2000) 4 4 () 5 5 5 6 () () 7 Total
More information取引銀行の破綻が企業経営に及ぼす影響について-阪和銀行破綻の事例分析-
2 JEL Classification: G21, G14 Key words: e-mail y-murakami@aria.ocn.ne.jp 1 The Effect of Bank Failure on Client Firms A Study on the Hanwa Bank s Failure By Yoshiko Murakami Abstract The financial theories
More information<95DB8C9288E397C389C88A E696E6462>
2011 Vol.60 No.2 p.138 147 Performance of the Japanese long-term care benefit: An International comparison based on OECD health data Mie MORIKAWA[1] Takako TSUTSUI[2] [1]National Institute of Public Health,
More informationTitle ベンチャー企業の研究開発支出の決定要因 日本と台湾の事例を中心に Author(s) 蘇, 顯揚 Citation 經濟論叢 (1996), 158(1): Issue Date URL Right
Title ベンチャー企業の研究開発支出の決定要因 日本と台湾の事例を中心に Author(s) 蘇, 顯揚 Citation 經濟論叢 (1996), 158(1): 54-76 Issue Date 1996-07 URL https://doi.org/10.14989/45083 Right Type Departmental Bulletin Paper Textversion publisher
More information1 Nelson-Siegel Nelson and Siegel(1987) 3 Nelson-Siegel 3 Nelson-Siegel 2 3 Nelson-Siegel 2 Nelson-Siegel Litterman and Scheinkman(199
Nelson-Siegel Nelson-Siegel 1992 2007 15 1 Nelson and Siegel(1987) 2 FF VAR 1996 FF B) 1 Nelson-Siegel 15 90 1 Nelson and Siegel(1987) 3 Nelson-Siegel 3 Nelson-Siegel 2 3 Nelson-Siegel 2 Nelson-Siegel
More information160_cov.indd
3 1 2 3 1. 2. 2.1 7 3 1996 welfare to work 2. 1 195 196 197 198 99 Autumn 7 No. 16 4. 3.5 3. 2.5 2. 1.5 1..5. 195 1952 1954 1956 1958 196 1962 1964 1966 1968 197 1972 1974 1976 1978 198 1982 1984 1986
More informationThe Institute for Economic Studies Seijo University 6 1 20, Seijo, Setagaya Tokyo 157-8511, Japan The Institute for Economic Studies Green Paper No. 59 Consumers Decision on the Choice of Small Payment
More informationLibrary and Information Science No
Library and Information Science No. 65 2011, p. 83 107. Episodic Frame and Thematic Frame in Television News and Newspapers: An Analysis of the Coverage of General Elections in Japan Yuko MATSUBA Shuichi
More information…_…C…L…fi…J…o†[fiü“ePDF/−mflF™ƒ
80 80 80 3 3 5 8 10 12 14 14 17 22 24 27 33 35 35 37 38 41 43 46 47 50 50 52 54 56 56 59 62 65 67 71 74 74 76 80 83 83 84 87 91 91 92 95 96 98 98 101 104 107 107 109 110 111 111 113 115
More informationtotal2010.dvi
Ô ØÖ ÁÒØ ÖÔÓÐ Ø ÓÒ ÔÓÐÝÒÑ Ð Ø ÜØÖ ÔÓÐ Ø ÓÒ ËÓÑÑ Ö º½ ÁÒØ ÖÔÓÐ Ø ÓÒ Ä Ö Ò º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º ¾ º½º½ ÓÖÑÙÐ Ø ÓÒ ÖÝ ÒØÖ ÕÙ º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º½º¾ ÓÖÑÙÐ Æ ÛØÓÒ º º º º º
More informationPDF用 レポート:中国保険市場の現状と展望.PDF
1 INDEX 2 4 9 13 24 29 2 3 4 1000 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 100% 50% 0% 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 5 6 7 8 9
More information2 2 3 4 5 5 6 10 14 17 18 18 20
1. 1990 2001 38 02 2. 90 3. 00 3 4. 02 5.5 3.6 2 5. 02 03 GDP 0 2 2 3 4 5 5 6 10 14 17 18 18 20 1930 50 81090 10 2001 38 2.2 2.301 7 02 3.603 5 3.5 FRB03 2 11 BS BS BS 90 1 Personal Income and Its Disposition
More information三税協力の実質化 : 住民税の所得税閲覧に関する国税連携の効果
Kwansei Gakuin University Rep Title 三 税 協 力 の 実 質 化 : 住 民 税 の 所 得 税 閲 覧 に 関 する 国 税 連 携 の 効 果 Author(s) Suzuki, Ushio, 鈴 木, 潮 Citation 経 済 学 論 究, 65(4): 175-197 Issue Date 2012-03-20 URL http://hdl.handle.net/10236/9133
More informationはじめに
No.6, 397-408 (2005) Regional Integration East Asian Community Vision HORIUCHI Hiroshi Nihon University, Graduate School of Social Culture Studies In an effort to pursue the ambitious aim of laying the
More information2 / 24
2017 11 9 1 / 24 2 / 24 Solow, 1957 total factor productivity; TFP 5% 経済成長率の要因分解 4% 3% 2.68% 2.51% 2% 1% 0% 1.63% 1.50% 0.34% 0.42% 0.55% 0.97% 1.14% 0.86% 0.13% -0.59% -0.59% -0.09% 0.01% -1% 1970-80
More informationデフレの定義(最新版).PDF
DP/01-1 Director General for Economic Assessment and Policy Analysis CABINET OFFICE E-mail : naoki.okamoto@mfs.cao.go.jp 1 2 3 i (ii) 4 5 Deflation defined as at least two consecutive years of price decreases.
More information税制改正にともなう家計の所得弾性値 : 高齢者パネルデータによる実証分析
Kwansei Gakuin University Rep Title Author(s) 税制改正にともなう家計の所得弾性値 : 高齢者パネルデータによる実証分析 Uemura, Toshiyuki, 上村, 敏之 ; Kitamura Takayuki, 金田, 陸幸 Citation 経済学論究, 69(4): 1-16 Issue Date 2016-3-20 URL http://hdl.handle.net/10236/14671
More information米国予算編成プロセスの紹介
OMB CBO GAO Formation of the President s s Budget Under the United States Constitution, in Article I, section 1, the power to legislate is vested in the United States Congress. The Congress of the United
More informationuntitled
Trade and Trade Finance in the 200809 Financial Crisis, IMF Working Paper WP/11/16., Understanding the Great Trade Collapse of 200809 and the Subsequent Trade Recovery, Economic Perspectives, 2Q/2011.
More informationPowerPoint プレゼンテーション
日本の政府債務と経済成長 小黒曜子 明海大学経済学部 & ICU 社会科学研究所 (SSRI) 研究員 研究の背景 政府債務の増加は成長率に負の影響? (Cf. ex. Reinhart and Rogoff (2010)) エンゲル曲線を用いて日本の 実際の 生活水準を加味すると インフレ率と成長率にバイアスを確認 CPI : 実際の物価水準よりも高く ( 1% 程度 ) 算出される傾向 (eg.
More information社会システム研究25_ 徐林.indd
D E-mail xlh@sass.org.cn Employer-based healthcare delivery system ........................................ U.S. Census Bureau Income, Poverty, and Health Insurance Coverage in the United States:Issued
More informationMicrosoft Word - 10 統計 参考.doc
参考 統計 主要輸入国の 1 日当たりの原油輸入量 原油の世界貿易マトリックス (140 ページ ) の中から輸入額が大きい日本 米国 中国等を選び 1 日あたりの原油輸入量を比較したのが表 - 1 である 貿易統計で使われている原油の数量単位は統一されていない 米国はバレル (Bbl) 日本はキロリットル (KL) の容積表示 EU 諸国やインドのメトリック トン (M. Ton) 中国や韓国のキログラム
More informationわが国証券市場、証券業界の戦後70年
I 70 Kiyoshi Nikami / / 1 70 2 2 3 4 70 1 1987 1990 2 072 2015 winter / No.406 5 II 4 4 3 18 Loan Contractor 3 2011 6 391 2012 spring 70 073 4 4 originating Manager 4 M.H. 1965 6 1987 12 074 2015 winter
More informationTitle 第 2 次 日 米 繊 維 紛 争 (1969 年 -1971 年 ) : 迷 走 の1000 日 Author(s) 石 井, 修 Citation 一 橋 法 学, 8(2): 3-33 Issue 2009-07 Date Type Departmental Bulletin Paper Text Version publisher URL http://hdl.handle.net/10086/17519
More informationボーナス制度と家計貯蓄率-サーベイ・データによる再検証-
ESRI Discussion Paper Series No.139 by May 2005 Economic and Social Research Instute Cabinet Office Tokyo, Japan * 400 : JEL classification: D12, E21 * 186-8603 2-1 042-580-8369 FAX 042-580-8333 1 Abstract
More information野村資本市場研究所|日本の高度経済成長を支えた財政投融資の意義と教訓-アジアで応用する場合のヒント-(PDF)
2013 Summer 1. 2. 3. 4. 1 2013 Summer 1 2 2 1 2010 2020 11 8 2 7,260 300 2007 7,000 3 1 25.0% 20.0% 15.0% 10.0% 5.0% 0.0% -5.0% -10.0% 1953 1965 1980 1995 2004 2007 2010 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10
More information005 1571 1630 17 1546 1601 16 1642 1727
I Takamitsu Sawa / 1561~1626 004 2010 / No.384 005 1571 1630 17 1546 1601 16 1642 1727 006 2010 / No.384 confirm refute verify significant 1902 1994 piecemeal engineering 1958 historicism 20 007 1990 90
More information野村資本市場研究所|アジアの金融競争力(PDF)
2013 Spring 1. GDP 3 26% 2. 3. 4. GDP 1 GDP 2000 25.4% 2012 10 IMF 1 GDP 28.7%GDP 10.7% 20.3% 2000 2012 10 2 3 2000 2012 4.2 5.4 2 2000 14% 2012 26% GDP 2012 30 10 32003 11 2013 Spring 100% 2 90% 80% 70%
More informationA Message From President 2 Kanamoto examiner vo.18
vol.18 2000.11.1 2001.10.31 contents A Message From President News Headline Report & Interview Annual Report 2001 At A Glance 2 3 4 6 14 Corporate Data Stock Price Range And Volume Investor Information
More information環境影響評価制度をめぐる法的諸問題(4) : 米国の環境影響評価制度について
Kwansei Gakuin University Rep Title Author(s) 環 境 影 響 評 価 制 度 をめぐる 法 的 諸 問 題 (4) : 米 国 の 環 境 影 響 評 価 制 度 について Sekine, Takamichi, 関 根, 孝 道 Citation 総 合 政 策 研 究, 33: 73-103 Issue Date 2010-02-20 URL http://hdl.handle.net/10236/3583
More information冷戦後の戦略環境変化とクリントン政権
1998 11 3558 1 21 2 1 Paul D. Wolfowitz, Clinton s First Year, Foreign Affairs, Vol. 73, No. 15 (January/February, 1994). 2 91 36 3 91 G-7 G-7 4 G-7 5 (primacy) 6 1949 1950 1962 10 71 89 11 91 12 3 James
More information80024622 1996 Science for Open and Environmental Systems 80024622 KIKUCHI, Atsushi Optimal Asset Allocation with Real Estate The institutional investors such as life insurance companies, trust banks, and
More informationPublic Pension and Immigration The Effects of Immigration on Welfare Inequality The immigration of unskilled workers has been analyzed by a considerab
Public Pension and Immigration The Effects of Immigration on Welfare Inequality The immigration of unskilled workers has been analyzed by a considerable amount of research, which has noted an ability distribution.
More informationMicrosoft Word - Šv”|“Å‘I.DOC
90 ª ª * E-mailshinobu.nakagawa@boj.or.jp i ii iii iv SNA 1 70 80 2 80 90 80 80 90 1 80 90 98 6 1 1 SNA 2 1 SNA 80 1SNA 1 19931998 1 2-190 1,2 2 2-2 2-3,4 3 2-5 4 2030 2-3 3 2-15 97 20 90 2-15 9198 1.
More information0304_ふじみ野地福_本編_01
 à uã Æl¾ à í{ä  e Ê r» ± à à Š ÃÁ Âà ÃÄÁ xtr e  Ãà à í ÂÆ e rtr Áx e Ætr etr µ»æ eº lá Ãû Á ex Ä tr exí»l éîð ÄƱ «d ex z tr z ex z e e tr e z e z ex éîð îãëù Ôé tr exí» træ z l º z Â í Š Ê }
More information<303288C991BD946797C797592E696E6464>
175 71 5 19 / 100 20 20 309 133 72 176 62 3 8 2009 2002 1 2 3 1 8 1 20 1 2 + 0.4952 1 2 http://www.mtwa.or.jp/ h19mokuji.html 20 100 146 0 6,365 359 111 0 38,997 11,689 133,960 36,830 76,177 155,684 18,068
More information大学における原価計算教育の現状と課題
1 1.1 1.2 1.3 2 2.1 2.2 3 3.1 3.2 3.3 2014a 50 ABC Activity Based Costing LCC Lifecycle Costing MFCA Material Flow Cost Accounting 2 2 2016 9 1 2 3 2014b 2005 2014b 2000 1 2 1962 5 1 3 2 3 4 5 50 2012
More informationRIETI Highlight VOL.25
RIETI Highlight 2009 SUMMER 25 VOL. Research Digest RIETI 2009 SUMMER VOL. 25 Highlight 1 2 3 5 8 10 12 13 14 19 ResearchDigest 20 24 28 32 36 38 40 41 42 44 45 RIETI Topics 01 CONTENTS 02 RIETI Highlight
More informationuntitled
JAIS 1 2 1 2 In this paper, we focus on the pauses that partly characterize the utterances of simultaneous interpreters, and attempt to analyze the results of experiments conducted using human subjects
More informationSHIBATA, Tsubasa KOSAKA, Hiroyuki Vol.14 No Winter 013
9 5 1 89 3 SHIBATA, Tsubasa KOSAKA, Hiroyuki 1 9 3 9 9 2 3 4 5 6 7 2 1967 1 1973 2 1974 3 1997 4 Vol.14 No.4 2012 Winter 013 CGE 5 6 1996 7 6 CGE 9 5 1 835 9 35 3 3.1 9 9 4012 2 5 1 8 1 35 8 12 2 1. 2.
More information1. 2. (Rowthorn, 2014) / 39 1
,, 43 ( ) 2015 7 18 ( ) E-mail: sasaki@econ.kyoto-u.ac.jp 1 / 39 1. 2. (Rowthorn, 2014) 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 2 / 39 1 ( 1). ( 2). = +. 1. g. r. r > g ( 3).. 3 / 39 2 50% Figure I.1. Income inequality in the
More informationAttendance Demand for J-League õ Shinsuke KAWAI* and Takeo HIRATA* Abstract The purpose of this study was to clarify the variables determining the attendance in J-league matches, using the 2,699 J-league
More information46 RIM 2007 Vol.7 No HSBC WTO 2006
19782006 200716.7 2006 2007 RIM 2007 Vol.7 No.27 45 46 RIM 2007 Vol.7 No.27 2003 HSBC 1978 2006 2007 WTO 2006 RIM 2007 Vol.7 No.27 47 2003 10 92 95 98 99 4,000 20032006 2003 225 AMC 150 joint -stock companies
More information日本の高齢者世帯の貯蓄行動に関する実証分析
196 2017 * ** ** 1 2 3 JEL Classification Codes D14, D15, E21 Keywords * 28 Hyun- Hoon Lee Robert Owen Kwanho Shin ** 29 196 An Empirical Analysis of the Saving Behavior of Elderly Households in Japan
More information中国市場における日系・欧米系企業の戦略比較
No.24 2002 7 Abstract In this paper, I review the trade conflict between Japan and China, which happened in 2001. The import 3 list of articles (car, portable telephone, air conditioner) from Japan to
More informationfiúŁÄ”s‘ê‡ÌŁª”U…−…X…N…v…„…~…A…•‡Ì ”s‘ê™´›ß…−…^†[…fiŠ‚ª›Âfl’«
2016/3/11 Realized Volatility RV 1 RV 1 Implied Volatility IV Volatility Risk Premium VRP 1 (Fama and French(1988) Campbell and Shiller(1988)) (Hodrick(1992)) (Lettau and Ludvigson (2001)) VRP (Bollerslev
More informationuntitled
Barro Regression Does social capital improve regional economic growth? - Investigation using prefectural cross-sectional data in Japan - Abstract The purpose of this research is to empirically examine
More informationJAPAN MARKETING JOURNAL 111 Vol.28 No.32008
Vol.28 No.32008 JAPAN MARKETING JOURNAL 111 Vol.28 No.32008 JAPAN MARKETING JOURNAL 111 Vol.28 No.32008 JAPAN MARKETING JOURNAL 111 Vol.28 No.32008 JAPAN MARKETING JOURNAL 111 Vol.28 No.32008 JAPAN MARKETING
More informationJAPAN MARKETING JOURNAL 113 Vol.29 No.12009
JAPAN MARKETING JOURNAL 113 Vol.29 No.12009 JAPAN MARKETING JOURNAL 113 Vol.29 No.12009 JAPAN MARKETING JOURNAL 113 Vol.29 No.12009 JAPAN MARKETING JOURNAL 113 Vol.29 No.12009 Vol.29 No.12009 JAPAN MARKETING
More informationJAPAN MARKETING JOURNAL 110 Vol.28 No.22008
Vol.28 No.22008 JAPAN MARKETING JOURNAL 110 Vol.28 No.22008 JAPAN MARKETING JOURNAL 110 Vol.28 No.22008 JAPAN MARKETING JOURNAL 110 Vol.28 No.22008 JAPAN MARKETING JOURNAL 110 Vol.28 No.22008 JAPAN MARKETING
More information......,,,,,,... a OECDa IS Islamic State
Economic Study of Immigration Problem Toshio KOSAKI Abstract This paper considered the issue of acceptance of the foreign worker in the labor market. In Section, I surveyed the immigrant situation of other
More information本文
Oct 25, 2013 1. (1) (2) (3) (4) 2. 3. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)2013 4. (1) FRB (2) 9 FOMC (3) Tapering (03-3497-3675) miwa-y @itochu.co.jp (03-3497-6284) maruyama-yo @itochu.co.jp Summary 10 1 17 2 10
More information国際流動性に関する財政的側面について
IMF SDR IMF 2011 6 1 2 2011 E-mail: obstfeld@econ.berkeley.edu / /2011.10 35 1. 2007 2009 2 Goodhart [1999] 2010 11 2. 4 1970 IMF 1960 36 /2011.10 international reserve 1 D 35 1 D 35 1960 Eichengreen [2011]
More information