mains.dvi
|
|
- かずし とべ
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 8 Λ MRI.COM 8.1 Mellor and Yamada (198) level.5 8. Noh and Kim (1999) 8.3 Large et al. (1994) K-profile parameterization : (MRI.COM ) Mellor and Yamada Noh and Kim KPP (avdsl) K H K B K x (avm) K V K K x ( : Mellor-Yamada ) - - (eb : Noh and Kim ) = E - (alo : KPP ) l l Mellor and Yamada s Turbulence Closure Model U P Θ ρ DU j ρ t = x i (ρu i ) (8.1) + ρε jkl f k U l = x k ( ρ < u k u j >) P x j g j ρ (8.) ρ DΘ = x k ( ρ < u k θ >) (8.3) D( )= U k ()= x k + ()= t g j f k ε ijk < > (8.3) Boussines (8.) Λ 85
2 8 Boussines < > closure second moment closure Kantha and Clayson (000) Mellor and Yamada (198) Rotta (1951a,b) Reynolds stress : D p ρ ui x j + u j x i E = < u i u j > δ ij 3l 1 3 +C 1 U i U j + x j x i < u i > l 1 C 1 δ ij (= 1(i = j); = 0(i 6= j)) Kolmogolov D ui u E j ν = x k x k 3 ν Λ 1 3 (8.4) Λ 1 δ ij (8.5) D p θ E = < u j θ > (8.6) ρ x j 3l D uj θ E (κ + ν) = 0 (8.7) x k x k κ l D θ θ E κ = < θ > (8.8) x k x k Λ Λ < u k u i u j > = 3 5 ls < ui u j > + < u iu k > + < u ju k > x k x j x i < uk θ > < u k u j θ > = ls uθ + < u jθ > x j x k (8.9) (8.10) < u k θ > = ls θ < θ > x k (8.11) S ;S uθ ;S θ < pθ >= 0 < pu i >= 0 86
3 8.1. Mellor and Yamada s Turbulence Closure Model Mellor-Yamada (l 1 ;Λ 1 ;l ;Λ )=(A 1 ;B 1 ;A ;B )l (8.1) l master length scale A 1 ;B 1 ;A ;B C 1 Mellor and Yamada (198) (A 1 ;B 1 ;A ;B ;C 1 )=(0:9;16:6;0:74;10:1;0:08) 8.1. The level-.5 Model level-4 level-3 ( =) (< θ >) (< θs >) (< s >) level-.5 (8.30) level- MRI.COM level-.5 ffl ffl ffl ρ DU + ρ < uw > = P + ρ fv x (8.13) ρ DV + ρ < vw > = P ρ fu y (8.14) 0 = P ρg (8.15) ρ DΘ + (ρ < wθ >) = 0 (8.16) D h i ls = P s + P b ε (8.17) P s = < wu U V > < wv > (8.18) 87
4 8 P b = g < wρ >=ρ 0 (8.19) ε = 3 =Λ 1 (8.0) < u > = l < v > = l < w > = l h 4 < wu U > h < wu U > V i + < wv > P b 4 < wv > V P b h < wu U V > + < wv > + 4P b i i (8.1) (8.) (8.3) < uv 3l h 1 > = < wu > = 3l 1 < vw > = 3l 1 < uw V > h (< w > C 1 U ) U i < vw > i g < uρ > h (< w > C 1 ) V g < vρ > i (8.4) (8.5) (8.6) < uθ 3l h > = < uw Θ > h < vθ > = 3l < wθ > = 3l U i < wθ > < vw Θ V i > < wθ > h < w Θ i > g < θρ > < θ >= Λ < wθ > Θ (8.7) (8.8) (8.9) (8.30) U < uw > = K M (8.31) V < vw > = K M (8.3) Θ < θw > = K H (8.33) K M = ls M (8.34) K H = ls H (8.35) K M ;K H 88
5 8.1. Mellor and Yamada s Turbulence Closure Model S M S H S M [6A 1 A G M ]+S H [1 3A B G H 1A 1 A G H ]=A S M [1 +6A 1G M 9A 1 A G H ] S H [1A 1G H + 9A 1 A G H ]=A 1 (1 3C 1 ) (8.36) G M l h U V i + G H l g ρ ρ 0 (8.37) (8.38) ρ= S M S H l (8.34) (8.35) K M ;K H (8.17) D h K i h U V i = K g ρ M + + K H ρ 0 ε (8.39) K = ls MRI.COM S S M (G H = 0) S = 0: S = S c S M =S Mn (S c = 0:;S Mn = S M (G H = 0) =0:397) = l = 0 (8.40) ( ρ s ) (τ s ) u τ (τ s =ρ s ) 1= ρ s 3 =Λ 1 = τ s u τ =l (8.1) = B =3 1 u τ (8.41) master length scale MRI.COM : Z 0 Z 0 l = γ jz 0 jdz 0 = z b dz 0 z b (8.4) γ = 0: z b Mellor and Yamada (198) n MYSL5 n n+1 l (8.34) (8.36) n 89
6 8 n+1 l (8.39) (8.1) (8.0) (8.41) K 8.4 master length scale (8.4) 8. Noh and Kim (1999) Mellor and Yamada Noh and Kim (1999) Mellor and Yamada second moment closure 8..1 U V B = g ρ=ρ o E DU DV DB DE = < uw > 1 P + fv ρ x (8.43) = < vw > 1 P fu ρ y (8.44) = < bw > R = p < w ρ + uu + vv + ww > < uw > U (8.45) V < vw > < bw > ε (8.46) R R= DU DV DB DE = K U = K V B = K B E = K E 1 P ρ x P 1 ρ R + K U + fv (8.47) fu (8.48) y U + K V V + B K B K;K B ;K E (ε) ( =(E) 1= ) (l) (8.49) ε (8.50) K = Sl (8.51) K B = S B l (8.5) K E = S E l (8.53) ε = C 3 l 1 (8.54) 90
7 8.. Noh and Kim (1999) (S;S B ;S E ;C) S = S 0 = 0:39 Pr = S=S B = 0:8 σ = S=S E = 1:95 C = C 0 = 0:06 l b = =N (N = B=) 1= K ο l b ο lri t (8.55) Ri t Ri t =(Nl=) (8.56) N Ri t K ) Ri t (8.55) S S=S 0 =(1 + αri t ) 1= (8.57) α Noh and Kim (1999) α ο 10:0 C C=C 0 =(1 + αri t ) 1= (8.58) l = κ(z + z 0 ) (1 + κ(z + z 0 )=h) (8.59) z 0 (z 0 = 1[m]) z h K U B K B E K E = τ ρ 0 (8.60) = Q 0 (8.61) = mu 3 Λ (8.6) m Noh and Kim (1999) m = 100 N < 0 K = K B = 1:0[m s 1 ] K E (K) 8.. nkoblm.f90 E 8.50 E N E 91
8 8 8.3 K Profile Parameterization (KPP) K profile parameterization (KPP) Monin-Obukhov ν x MRI.COM Mellor and Yamada (198) KPP nonlocal K profile model(troen and Mahrt 1986) Large et al.(1994) MRI.COM KPP NCEP (NCOM) X < wx > X U V T S B x u v T s b w ( ) m s t X = z < wx > (8.63) KPP X nonlocal < wx >= K x ( z X γ x ) (8.64) MRI.COM KPP K x nonlocal γ x ffl < wx 0 > ffl L ffl h ffl φ x ffl w x ffl K x ffl ν x ffl nonlocal γ x 8.3. Monin-Obukhov Monin-Obukhov d(= z) < wx 0 > nonlocal X= ( ) x= ( ) 9
9 8.3. K Profile Parameterization (KPP) 8.1: KPP ffl u Λ =(< wu 0 > + < wv 0 > ) 1= = j~τ 0 j=ρ 0 (8.65) ffl S Λ = < ws 0 >=u Λ (8.66) ffl Monin-Obukhov L = u Λ3 =(κb f ) (8.67) ~τ 0 ρ 0 κ = 0:4 von Karman B f ; ( ) d < εh [ε fi 1 ε ο 0:1]) < wx 0 > u Λ, S Λ, L ζ = d=l φ m (ζ ) = κd u Λ z (U +V ) 1= φ s (ζ ) = κd (8.68) S Λ z S K x w x G(σ ) K x h K x (σ )=hw x (σ )G(σ ) (8.69) σ = d=h( / ) G(σ ) (O Brien 1970) G(σ )=a 0 + a 1 σ + a σ + a 3 σ 3 (8.70) 93
10 8 8.: ( ) G(1) = σ G(1) =0 G(σ ) ( ) h=l = 1;0:1;0; 1; 5 w x (σ )=(κu Λ ) (h=l < 0) w s (σ ) ( ) w m (σ ) ( ) (h=l 0) ( ) Large et al.(1994) 8. G(σ ) w x (8.70) (σ = 0) K x = 0 a 0 = 0 (σ < ε[= 0:1]) Monin-Obukhov (8.64[γ x = 0]) (8.68) (8.69) w x (σ )(a 1 + a σ )= κuλ < wx(d) > (8.71) φ x (ζ ) < wx 0 > < wx > (Lumley and Panofski 1964; Tennekes 1973) (8.71) κuλ w x (σ )= φ x (ζ ) (8.7) (ζ (= d=l) < 0) σ = ε(ο 0:1) w x (σ )= φ κuλ ε < σ < 1 ζ < 0 x (εh=l) (8.73) w x (σ )= φ κuλ otherwise x (σh=l) w x ( 8.) φ x ζ (= d=l) (h=l = 0) κu Λ (h=l < 0) (h=l 0) Large et al.(1994) ( 8.3) 94
11 8.3. K Profile Parameterization (KPP) 8.3: ζ φ x Large et al.(1994) φ m = φ s = 1 + 5ζ 0» ζ φ m = (1 16ζ ) 1=4 ζ m» ζ < 0 φ m = (a m c m ζ ) 1=3 ζ < ζ m φ s = (1 16ζ ) 1= ζ s» ζ < 0 (8.74) φ s = (a s c s ζ ) 1=3 ζ < ζ s (ζ s ;c s ;a s ;ζ m ;c m ;a m )=( 1:0;98:96; 8:86; 0:;8:38;1:6) (h=l < 0) w s (σ ) w m (σ ) (h=l 0) (ζ < ζ x ) w s w Λ φ x φ x =(a x c x ζ ) 1=3 ζ < ζ x < 0 (8.75) (8.67) (8.73) w Λ =( B f h) 1=3 (8.76) w x = κ(a x u Λ3 + c x κσw Λ3 ) 1=3! κ(c x κσ) 1=3 w Λ σ < ε w x = κ(a x u Λ3 + c x κεw Λ3 ) 1=3! κ(c x κε) 1=3 w Λ ε» σ < 1 (8.77)! < wx > (8.71) < wx(σ ) >=<wx 0 >= 1 β r σ =ε = a 1 + a σ (8.78) σ = 0 (8.70) a 1 = 1;a = β r =ε σ = 1 G(1) = σ G(1) =0 ε = 0:1 a = ;a 3 = 1;β r = 0: 95
12 8 8.4: ( h) h d k 1 < h < d k d k 1 Large et al.(1994) KPP ν x (MRI.COM Tsujino et al.(000) ) ( d k 1 ) 8.4 δ = (h d k 1 )=(d k d k 1 ) K Λ x = (1 δ) K x (d k 1 )+δ K x (d k 1 ) (8.79) Λ x = (1 δ)ν x (d k 1 )+δk Λ x 8.4 ν x K x (d) (h) d k 1 Λ x K Λ x h d k 1 d k 1 < h < d 1 k d 1 k (8.79) K x (d k 1 ) ν x (d k 1 ) h B(d) ~ V (d) (B r B(d))d Ri b (d) = j ~ V r ~ V (d)j +Vt (8.80) (d) 96
13 8.3. K Profile Parameterization (KPP) Ri c (MRI.COM 0.3) B r ~ V r Vt =d (8.80) d = h (B r B(h))h Ri c = j ~ V r ~ V (h)j +Vt (8.81) (h) (j ~ V r ~ V (h)j = 0) B r N (N = B=) 8.5 (B r B(h)) = (h h e )N (h h e ) (8.64) (8.69) (8.76) (8.77) γ b fi N G(h e =h)=(h h e ) =h N(h e )=N=C v ; C v = 1:8 ( 8.5) d = h e < wb e >=<wb 0 >= β T (= 0:); <wb 0 > B f V t (d) =C v( β T ) 1= Ri c κ =3 (c s ε) 1=6 hnw Λ (8.8) w Λ (8.77) (w s ) V t (d) =C v( β T ) 1= Ri c κ (c s ε) 1= dnw s (8.83) (8.80) Vt N h K x N Vt (8.83) N h K x Nonlocal 8.5 local (0:35 < d=h < 0:8) (8.64 [γ x = 0]) < wb > (< 0) 8.5 (nonlocal ) < wb 0 > (> 0) < wb > local nonlocal counter gradient nonlocal local local < wb > h Nonlocal (Deardroff 197)Mailhôt and Benoit(198) nonlocal γ s γ s = C Λ < ws 0 > w Λ h C Λ = 10 γ x = 0 ζ 0 γ m = 0 ζ < 0 < γ s = C ws 0 > s ζ < 0 w s (σ )h < γ θ = C wθ 0 > + < wθ R > s ζ < 0 w s (σ )h (8.84) (8.85) C s = C Λ κ(c s κε) 1=3 (8.86) 97
14 8 8.5: (< wb 0 >) Large et al.(1994) < wθ R > nonlocal I 9 < wθ R >=[(I=ρC p ) 0 (I=ρC p ) hγ ] (8.87) C p h γ nonlocal References Deardroff, J. W., 197: Theoretical expression for the countergradient vertical heat flux, J. Geophys. Res., 77, Kantha, L. H., and C. A. Clayson, 000: Small Scale Processes in geophysical Fluid Flows, Academic Press, 888pp. Large, W. G., J. C. McWilliams, and S. C. Doney, 1994: Oceanic vertical mixing: a review and a model with a nonlocal boundary layer parameterization, Rev. Geophys., 3, Lumley, J. A., and H. A. Panofsky, 1964: The structure of the atmospheric turbulence, 39pp., John Wiley, New York. Mailhôt, J., and R. Benoit, 198: A finite-element model of the atmospheric boundary layer suitable for use with numerical weather prediction models, J. Atmos. Sci., 39, Mellor, G. L., and T. Yamada, 198: Development of a turbulence closure model for geophysical fluid problems, Rev. Geophys. Space Phys., 0,
15 8.3. K Profile Parameterization (KPP) Noh, Y., and H.-J. Kim, 1999: Simulations of temperature and turbulence structure of the oceanic boundary layer with the improved near-surface process, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 15,61-15,634. O Brien, J. J., 1970: A note on the vertical structure of the eddy exchange coefficient in the planetary boundary layer, J. Atmos. Sci., 7, Rotta, J. C., 1951a: Statistische Theotie nichthomogener Turbulenz, Z. Phys., 19, Rotta, J. C., 1951b: Statistische Theotie nichthomogener Turbulenz, Z. Phys., 131, Tennekes, H., 1973: A model for the dynamixcs of the inversion above a convective boundary layer, J. Atmos. Sci., 30, Treon, I. B., and L. Mahrt, 1986: A simple model of the atmospheric boundary layer; sensitivity to surface evaporation, Boundary Layer Meteorol., 37, Tsujino, H., H. Hasumi, and N. Suginohara, 000: Deep pacific circulation controlled by vertical diffusivity at the lower thermocline depth, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 30,
16 100
Venkatram and Wyngaard, Lectures on Air Pollution Modeling, m km 6.2 Stull, An Introduction to Boundary Layer Meteorology,
65 6 6.1 No.4 1982 1 1981 J. C. Kaimal 1993 1994 Turbulence and Diffusion in the Atmosphere : Lectures in Environmental Sciences, by A. K. Blackadar, Springer, 1998 An Introduction to Boundary Layer Meteorology,
More information,, Mellor 1973),, Mellor and Yamada 1974) Mellor 1973), Mellor and Yamada 1974) 4 2 3, 2 4,
Mellor and Yamada1974) The Turbulence Closure Model of Mellor and Yamada 1974) Kitamori Taichi 2004/01/30 ,, Mellor 1973),, Mellor and Yamada 1974) Mellor 1973), 4 1 4 Mellor and Yamada 1974) 4 2 3, 2
More informationmains.dvi
Meteorological Research Institute Community Ocean Model (MRI.COM) Manual (MRI.COM) Ichiro Ishikawa, Hiroyuki Tsujino, Mikitoshi Hirabara, Hideyuki Nakano, Tamaki Yasuda, and Hiroshi Ishizaki MRI Community
More informationall.dvi
72 9 Hooke,,,. Hooke. 9.1 Hooke 1 Hooke. 1, 1 Hooke. σ, ε, Young. σ ε (9.1), Young. τ γ G τ Gγ (9.2) X 1, X 2. Poisson, Poisson ν. ν ε 22 (9.) ε 11 F F X 2 X 1 9.1: Poisson 9.1. Hooke 7 Young Poisson G
More information9. 05 L x P(x) P(0) P(x) u(x) u(x) (0 < = x < = L) P(x) E(x) A(x) P(L) f ( d EA du ) = 0 (9.) dx dx u(0) = 0 (9.2) E(L)A(L) du (L) = f (9.3) dx (9.) P
9 (Finite Element Method; FEM) 9. 9. P(0) P(x) u(x) (a) P(L) f P(0) P(x) (b) 9. P(L) 9. 05 L x P(x) P(0) P(x) u(x) u(x) (0 < = x < = L) P(x) E(x) A(x) P(L) f ( d EA du ) = 0 (9.) dx dx u(0) = 0 (9.2) E(L)A(L)
More informationxyz,, uvw,, Bernoulli-Euler u c c c v, w θ x c c c dv ( x) dw uxyz (,, ) = u( x) y z + ω( yz, ) φ dx dx c vxyz (,, ) = v( x) zθ x ( x) c wxyz (,, ) =
,, uvw,, Bernoull-Euler u v, w θ dv ( ) dw u (,, ) u( ) ω(, ) φ d d v (,, ) v( ) θ ( ) w (,, ) w( ) θ ( ) (11.1) ω φ φ dθ / dφ v v θ u w u w 11.1 θ θ θ 11. vw, (11.1) u du d v d w ε d d d u v ω γ φ w u
More information, 1.,,,.,., (Lin, 1955).,.,.,.,. f, 2,. main.tex 2011/08/13( )
81 4 2 4.1, 1.,,,.,., (Lin, 1955).,.,.,.,. f, 2,. 82 4.2. ζ t + V (ζ + βy) = 0 (4.2.1), V = 0 (4.2.2). (4.2.1), (3.3.66) R 1 Φ / Z, Γ., F 1 ( 3.2 ). 7,., ( )., (4.2.1) 500 hpa., 500 hpa (4.2.1) 1949,.,
More information21 2 26 i 1 1 1.1............................ 1 1.2............................ 3 2 9 2.1................... 9 2.2.......... 9 2.3................... 11 2.4....................... 12 3 15 3.1..........
More information4 Mindlin -Reissner 4 δ T T T εσdω= δ ubdω+ δ utd Γ Ω Ω Γ T εσ (1.1) ε σ u b t 3 σ ε. u T T T = = = { σx σ y σ z τxy τ yz τzx} { εx εy εz γ xy γ yz γ
Mindlin -Rissnr δ εσd δ ubd+ δ utd Γ Γ εσ (.) ε σ u b t σ ε. u { σ σ σ z τ τ z τz} { ε ε εz γ γ z γ z} { u u uz} { b b bz} b t { t t tz}. ε u u u u z u u u z u u z ε + + + (.) z z z (.) u u NU (.) N U
More informationnsg02-13/ky045059301600033210
φ φ φ φ κ κ α α μ μ α α μ χ et al Neurosci. Res. Trpv J Physiol μ μ α α α β in vivo β β β β β β β β in vitro β γ μ δ μδ δ δ α θ α θ α In Biomechanics at Micro- and Nanoscale Levels, Volume I W W v W
More information数値計算:有限要素法
( ) 1 / 61 1 2 3 4 ( ) 2 / 61 ( ) 3 / 61 P(0) P(x) u(x) P(L) f P(0) P(x) P(L) ( ) 4 / 61 L P(x) E(x) A(x) x P(x) P(x) u(x) P(x) u(x) (0 x L) ( ) 5 / 61 u(x) 0 L x ( ) 6 / 61 P(0) P(L) f d dx ( EA du dx
More information20 4 20 i 1 1 1.1............................ 1 1.2............................ 4 2 11 2.1................... 11 2.2......................... 11 2.3....................... 19 3 25 3.1.............................
More informationn (1.6) i j=1 1 n a ij x j = b i (1.7) (1.7) (1.4) (1.5) (1.4) (1.7) u, v, w ε x, ε y, ε x, γ yz, γ zx, γ xy (1.8) ε x = u x ε y = v y ε z = w z γ yz
1 2 (a 1, a 2, a n ) (b 1, b 2, b n ) A (1.1) A = a 1 b 1 + a 2 b 2 + + a n b n (1.1) n A = a i b i (1.2) i=1 n i 1 n i=1 a i b i n i=1 A = a i b i (1.3) (1.3) (1.3) (1.1) (ummation convention) a 11 x
More informationmains.dvi
0 MRI.COM 0. 0. 0.3 0.4 0.5 0. 0.. Mellor and Kantha (989) - frazil ice MRI.COM Hunke and Dukowicz (997, 00) EVP (Elastic-Viscous-Plastic) 0. 0. MRI.COM hs hi snow ice ice QAI Qs QI QIO FTI T3 T T T0 T,
More informationK E N Z U 2012 7 16 HP M. 1 1 4 1.1 3.......................... 4 1.2................................... 4 1.2.1..................................... 4 1.2.2.................................... 5................................
More information変 位 変位とは 物体中のある点が変形後に 別の点に異動したときの位置の変化で あり ベクトル量である 変位には 物体の変形の他に剛体運動 剛体変位 が含まれている 剛体変位 P(x, y, z) 平行移動と回転 P! (x + u, y + v, z + w) Q(x + d x, y + dy,
変 位 変位とは 物体中のある点が変形後に 別の点に異動したときの位置の変化で あり ベクトル量である 変位には 物体の変形の他に剛体運動 剛体変位 が含まれている 剛体変位 P(x, y, z) 平行移動と回転 P! (x + u, y + v, z + w) Q(x + d x, y + dy, z + dz) Q! (x + d x + u + du, y + dy + v + dv, z +
More informationKENZOU Karman) x
KENZO 8 8 31 8 1 3 4 5 6 Karman) 7 3 8 x 8 1 1.1.............................. 3 1............................................. 5 1.3................................... 5 1.4 /.........................
More informationO x y z O ( O ) O (O ) 3 x y z O O x v t = t = 0 ( 1 ) O t = 0 c t r = ct P (x, y, z) r 2 = x 2 + y 2 + z 2 (t, x, y, z) (ct) 2 x 2 y 2 z 2 = 0
9 O y O ( O ) O (O ) 3 y O O v t = t = 0 ( ) O t = 0 t r = t P (, y, ) r = + y + (t,, y, ) (t) y = 0 () ( )O O t (t ) y = 0 () (t) y = (t ) y = 0 (3) O O v O O v O O O y y O O v P(, y,, t) t (, y,, t )
More information() [REQ] 0m 0 m/s () [REQ] (3) [POS] 4.3(3) ()() () ) m/s 4. ) 4. AMEDAS
() [REQ] 4. 4. () [REQ] 0m 0 m/s () [REQ] (3) [POS] 4.3(3) ()() () 0 0 4. 5050 0 ) 00 4 30354045m/s 4. ) 4. AMEDAS ) 4. 0 3 ) 4. 0 4. 4 4.3(3) () [REQ] () [REQ] (3) [POS] () ()() 4.3 P = ρ d AnC DG ()
More information5 1.2, 2, d a V a = M (1.2.1), M, a,,,,, Ω, V a V, V a = V + Ω r. (1.2.2), r i 1, i 2, i 3, i 1, i 2, i 3, A 2, A = 3 A n i n = n=1 da = 3 = n=1 3 n=1
4 1 1.1 ( ) 5 1.2, 2, d a V a = M (1.2.1), M, a,,,,, Ω, V a V, V a = V + Ω r. (1.2.2), r i 1, i 2, i 3, i 1, i 2, i 3, A 2, A = 3 A n i n = n=1 da = 3 = n=1 3 n=1 da n i n da n i n + 3 A ni n n=1 3 n=1
More information医系の統計入門第 2 版 サンプルページ この本の定価 判型などは, 以下の URL からご覧いただけます. このサンプルページの内容は, 第 2 版 1 刷発行時のものです.
医系の統計入門第 2 版 サンプルページ この本の定価 判型などは, 以下の URL からご覧いただけます. http://www.morikita.co.jp/books/mid/009192 このサンプルページの内容は, 第 2 版 1 刷発行時のものです. i 2 t 1. 2. 3 2 3. 6 4. 7 5. n 2 ν 6. 2 7. 2003 ii 2 2013 10 iii 1987
More informationu Θ u u u ( λ + ) v Θ v v v ( λ + ) (.) Θ ( λ + ) (.) u + + v (.),, S ( λ + ) uv,, S uv, SH (.8) (.8) S S (.9),
ML rgr ML ML ML (,, ) σ τ τ u + + τ σ τ v + + τ τ σ + + (.) uv,,,, σ, σ, σ, τ, τ, τ t (Hook) σ λθ + ε, τ γ σ λθ + ε, τ γ σ λθ + ε, τ γ λ, E ν ν λ E, E ( + ν)( ν) ( + ν) Θ Θ ε + ε + ε (.) ε, ε, ε, γ, γ,
More information1 1.1 / Fik Γ= D n x / Newton Γ= µ vx y / Fouie Q = κ T x 1. fx, tdx t x x + dx f t = D f x 1 fx, t = 1 exp x 4πDt 4Dt lim fx, t =δx 3 t + dxfx, t = 1
1 1.1......... 1............. 1.3... 1.4......... 1.5.............. 1.6................ Bownian Motion.1.......... Einstein.............. 3.3 Einstein........ 3.4..... 3.5 Langevin Eq.... 3.6................
More information2 (March 13, 2010) N Λ a = i,j=1 x i ( d (a) i,j x j ), Λ h = N i,j=1 x i ( d (h) i,j x j ) B a B h B a = N i,j=1 ν i d (a) i,j, B h = x j N i,j=1 ν i
1. A. M. Turing [18] 60 Turing A. Gierer H. Meinhardt [1] : (GM) ) a t = D a a xx µa + ρ (c a2 h + ρ 0 (0 < x < l, t > 0) h t = D h h xx νh + c ρ a 2 (0 < x < l, t > 0) a x = h x = 0 (x = 0, l) a = a(x,
More informationall.dvi
38 5 Cauchy.,,,,., σ.,, 3,,. 5.1 Cauchy (a) (b) (a) (b) 5.1: 5.1. Cauchy 39 F Q Newton F F F Q F Q 5.2: n n ds df n ( 5.1). df n n df(n) df n, t n. t n = df n (5.1) ds 40 5 Cauchy t l n mds df n 5.3: t
More information: , 2.0, 3.0, 2.0, (%) ( 2.
2017 1 2 1.1...................................... 2 1.2......................................... 4 1.3........................................... 10 1.4................................. 14 1.5..........................................
More information24 I ( ) 1. R 3 (i) C : x 2 + y 2 1 = 0 (ii) C : y = ± 1 x 2 ( 1 x 1) (iii) C : x = cos t, y = sin t (0 t 2π) 1.1. γ : [a, b] R n ; t γ(t) = (x
24 I 1.1.. ( ) 1. R 3 (i) C : x 2 + y 2 1 = 0 (ii) C : y = ± 1 x 2 ( 1 x 1) (iii) C : x = cos t, y = sin t (0 t 2π) 1.1. γ : [a, b] R n ; t γ(t) = (x 1 (t), x 2 (t),, x n (t)) ( ) ( ), γ : (i) x 1 (t),
More information,, Andrej Gendiar (Density Matrix Renormalization Group, DMRG) 1 10 S.R. White [1, 2] 2 DMRG ( ) [3, 2] DMRG Baxter [4, 5] 2 Ising 2 1 Ising 1 1 Ising
,, Andrej Gendiar (Density Matrix Renormalization Group, DMRG) 1 10 S.R. White [1, 2] 2 DMRG ( ) [3, 2] DMRG Baxter [4, 5] 2 Ising 2 1 Ising 1 1 Ising Model 1 Ising 1 Ising Model N Ising (σ i = ±1) (Free
More informationmeiji_resume_1.PDF
β β β (q 1,q,..., q n ; p 1, p,..., p n ) H(q 1,q,..., q n ; p 1, p,..., p n ) Hψ = εψ ε k = k +1/ ε k = k(k 1) (x, y, z; p x, p y, p z ) (r; p r ), (θ; p θ ), (ϕ; p ϕ ) ε k = 1/ k p i dq i E total = E
More informationX G P G (X) G BG [X, BG] S 2 2 2 S 2 2 S 2 = { (x 1, x 2, x 3 ) R 3 x 2 1 + x 2 2 + x 2 3 = 1 } R 3 S 2 S 2 v x S 2 x x v(x) T x S 2 T x S 2 S 2 x T x S 2 = { ξ R 3 x ξ } R 3 T x S 2 S 2 x x T x S 2
More information1 (Berry,1975) 2-6 p (S πr 2 )p πr 2 p 2πRγ p p = 2γ R (2.5).1-1 : : : : ( ).2 α, β α, β () X S = X X α X β (.1) 1 2
2005 9/8-11 2 2.2 ( 2-5) γ ( ) γ cos θ 2πr πρhr 2 g h = 2γ cos θ ρgr (2.1) γ = ρgrh (2.2) 2 cos θ θ cos θ = 1 (2.2) γ = 1 ρgrh (2.) 2 2. p p ρgh p ( ) p p = p ρgh (2.) h p p = 2γ r 1 1 (Berry,1975) 2-6
More informationgr09.dvi
.1, θ, ϕ d = A, t dt + B, t dtd + C, t d + D, t dθ +in θdϕ.1.1 t { = f1,t t = f,t { D, t = B, t =.1. t A, tdt e φ,t dt, C, td e λ,t d.1.3,t, t d = e φ,t dt + e λ,t d + dθ +in θdϕ.1.4 { = f1,t t = f,t {
More information10:30 12:00 P.G. vs vs vs 2
1 10:30 12:00 P.G. vs vs vs 2 LOGIT PROBIT TOBIT mean median mode CV 3 4 5 0.5 1000 6 45 7 P(A B) = P(A) + P(B) - P(A B) P(B A)=P(A B)/P(A) P(A B)=P(B A) P(A) P(A B) P(A) P(B A) P(B) P(A B) P(A) P(B) P(B
More informationColaprete and Toon , 212 K, 6.2 mbar,.,, 38 (Carr, 1986; Pollack et al., 1987).,, 25% (Gough, 1981)., CO 2. CO 2 CO 2. Pollack et al. (1987
Colaprete and Toon 2003 4 16 4, 212 K, 6.2 mbar,.,, 38 (Carr, 1986; Pollack et al., 1987).,, 25% (Gough, 1981)., CO 2. CO 2 CO 2. Pollack et al. (1987) 1,. 75%, 5 bar CO 2. Kasting (1991) CO 2 1,. Pollack
More information(1.2) T D = 0 T = D = 30 kn 1.2 (1.4) 2F W = 0 F = W/2 = 300 kn/2 = 150 kn 1.3 (1.9) R = W 1 + W 2 = = 1100 N. (1.9) W 2 b W 1 a = 0
1 1 1.1 1.) T D = T = D = kn 1. 1.4) F W = F = W/ = kn/ = 15 kn 1. 1.9) R = W 1 + W = 6 + 5 = 11 N. 1.9) W b W 1 a = a = W /W 1 )b = 5/6) = 5 cm 1.4 AB AC P 1, P x, y x, y y x 1.4.) P sin 6 + P 1 sin 45
More informationD = [a, b] [c, d] D ij P ij (ξ ij, η ij ) f S(f,, {P ij }) S(f,, {P ij }) = = k m i=1 j=1 m n f(ξ ij, η ij )(x i x i 1 )(y j y j 1 ) = i=1 j
6 6.. [, b] [, d] ij P ij ξ ij, η ij f Sf,, {P ij } Sf,, {P ij } k m i j m fξ ij, η ij i i j j i j i m i j k i i j j m i i j j k i i j j kb d {P ij } lim Sf,, {P ij} kb d f, k [, b] [, d] f, d kb d 6..
More information[Ver. 0.2] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1 1.1 1 1.2 1. (elasticity) 2. (plasticity) 3. (strength) 4. 5. (toughness) 6. 1 1.2 1. (elasticity) } 1 1.2 2. (plasticity), 1 1.2 3. (strength) a < b F
More informationJFE.dvi
,, Department of Civil Engineering, Chuo University Kasuga 1-13-27, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 112 8551, JAPAN E-mail : atsu1005@kc.chuo-u.ac.jp E-mail : kawa@civil.chuo-u.ac.jp SATO KOGYO CO., LTD. 12-20, Nihonbashi-Honcho
More informationhttp://www.ike-dyn.ritsumei.ac.jp/ hyoo/wave.html 1 1, 5 3 1.1 1..................................... 3 1.2 5.1................................... 4 1.3.......................... 5 1.4 5.2, 5.3....................
More informationShunsuke Kobayashi 1 [6] [11] [7] u t = D 2 u 1 x 2 + f(u, v) + s L u(t, x)dx, L x (0.L), t > 0, Neumann 0 v t = D 2 v 2 + g(u, v), x (0, L), t > 0. x
Shunsuke Kobayashi [6] [] [7] u t = D 2 u x 2 + fu, v + s L ut, xdx, L x 0.L, t > 0, Neumann 0 v t = D 2 v 2 + gu, v, x 0, L, t > 0. x2 u u v t, 0 = t, L = 0, x x. v t, 0 = t, L = 0.2 x x ut, x R vt, x
More information) a + b = i + 6 b c = 6i j ) a = 0 b = c = 0 ) â = i + j 0 ˆb = 4) a b = b c = j + ) cos α = cos β = 6) a ˆb = b ĉ = 0 7) a b = 6i j b c = i + 6j + 8)
4 4 ) a + b = i + 6 b c = 6i j ) a = 0 b = c = 0 ) â = i + j 0 ˆb = 4) a b = b c = j + ) cos α = cos β = 6) a ˆb = b ĉ = 0 7) a b = 6i j b c = i + 6j + 8) a b a b = 6i j 4 b c b c 9) a b = 4 a b) c = 7
More information( ) ( )
20 21 2 8 1 2 2 3 21 3 22 3 23 4 24 5 25 5 26 6 27 8 28 ( ) 9 3 10 31 10 32 ( ) 12 4 13 41 0 13 42 14 43 0 15 44 17 5 18 6 18 1 1 2 2 1 2 1 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 2 2 21 t (x(t) y(t)) 2 x(t) y(t) γ(t) (x(t) y(t))
More informationII A A441 : October 02, 2014 Version : Kawahira, Tomoki TA (Kondo, Hirotaka )
II 214-1 : October 2, 214 Version : 1.1 Kawahira, Tomoki TA (Kondo, Hirotaka ) http://www.math.nagoya-u.ac.jp/~kawahira/courses/14w-biseki.html pdf 1 2 1 9 1 16 1 23 1 3 11 6 11 13 11 2 11 27 12 4 12 11
More informationII ( ) (7/31) II ( [ (3.4)] Navier Stokes [ (6/29)] Navier Stokes 3 [ (6/19)] Re
II 29 7 29-7-27 ( ) (7/31) II (http://www.damp.tottori-u.ac.jp/~ooshida/edu/fluid/) [ (3.4)] Navier Stokes [ (6/29)] Navier Stokes 3 [ (6/19)] Reynolds [ (4.6), (45.8)] [ p.186] Navier Stokes I Euler Navier
More informationuntitled
18 1 2,000,000 2,000,000 2007 2 2 2008 3 31 (1) 6 JCOSSAR 2007pp.57-642007.6. LCC (1) (2) 2 10mm 1020 14 12 10 8 6 4 40,50,60 2 0 1998 27.5 1995 1960 40 1) 2) 3) LCC LCC LCC 1 1) Vol.42No.5pp.29-322004.5.
More information(2005) (2005) 1 2 ( 1 ) 20km 2 4km 20km 40km 400km 10 1km 2km Ruscher and Deardroff (1982) Dempsey and Rotunno (1988) Smolarkiewcz et al. (1988) Smola
(2005) (2005) 1 2 ( 1 ) 20km 2 4km 20km 40km 400km 10 1km 2km Ruscher and Deardroff (1982) Dempsey and Rotunno (1988) Smolarkiewcz et al. (1988) Smolarkiwicz and Rotunno (1989) F r = 0.15 0.5 ( F r = u/nh,
More information第5章 偏微分方程式の境界値問題
October 5, 2018 1 / 113 4 ( ) 2 / 113 Poisson 5.1 Poisson ( A.7.1) Poisson Poisson 1 (A.6 ) Γ p p N u D Γ D b 5.1.1: = Γ D Γ N 3 / 113 Poisson 5.1.1 d {2, 3} Lipschitz (A.5 ) Γ D Γ N = \ Γ D Γ p Γ N Γ
More informationOHP.dvi
7 2010 11 22 1 7 http://www.sml.k.u-tokyo.ac.jp/members/nabe/lecture2010 nabe@sml.k.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2 1. 10/ 4 2. 10/18 3. 10/25 2, 3 4. 11/ 1 5. 11/ 8 6. 11/15 7. 11/22 8. 11/29 9. 12/ 6 skyline 10. 12/13
More informationJuly 28, H H 0 H int = H H 0 H int = H int (x)d 3 x Schrödinger Picture Ψ(t) S =e iht Ψ H O S Heisenberg Picture Ψ H O H (t) =e iht O S e i
July 8, 4. H H H int H H H int H int (x)d 3 x Schrödinger Picture Ψ(t) S e iht Ψ H O S Heisenberg Picture Ψ H O H (t) e iht O S e iht Interaction Picture Ψ(t) D e iht Ψ(t) S O D (t) e iht O S e ih t (Dirac
More informationPart () () Γ Part ,
Contents a 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 7 7. 8.. 8.. 8.3. 8 Part. 9. 9.. 9.. 3. 3.. 3.. 3 4. 5 4.. 5 4.. 9 4.3. 3 Part. 6 5. () 6 5.. () 7 5.. 9 5.3. Γ 3 6. 3 6.. 3 6.. 3 6.3. 33 Part 3. 34 7. 34 7.. 34 7.. 34 8. 35
More informationMyers, Montgomery & Anderson-Cook (2009) Response Surface Methodology
Myers, R.H., Montgomery, D.C. & Anderson-Cook, C.M. (2009) Response Surface Methodology, Third Edition. Chapter 7. Experimantal Designs for Fitting Response Surfaces - I. (response surface methodology)
More information2009 2 26 1 3 1.1.................................................. 3 1.2..................................................... 3 1.3...................................................... 3 1.4.....................................................
More informationi Version 1.1, (2012/02/22 24),.,..,.,,. R-space,, ( R- space),, Kahler (Kähler C-space)., R-space,., R-space, Hermite,.
R-space ( ) Version 1.1 (2012/02/29) i Version 1.1, (2012/02/22 24),.,..,.,,. R-space,, ( R- space),, Kahler (Kähler C-space)., R-space,., R-space, Hermite,. ii 1 Lie 1 1.1 Killing................................
More information( ) ) ) ) 5) 1 J = σe 2 6) ) 9) 1955 Statistical-Mechanical Theory of Irreversible Processes )
( 3 7 4 ) 2 2 ) 8 2 954 2) 955 3) 5) J = σe 2 6) 955 7) 9) 955 Statistical-Mechanical Theory of Irreversible Processes 957 ) 3 4 2 A B H (t) = Ae iωt B(t) = B(ω)e iωt B(ω) = [ Φ R (ω) Φ R () ] iω Φ R (t)
More information~nabe/lecture/index.html 2
2001 12 13 1 http://www.sml.k.u-tokyo.ac.jp/ ~nabe/lecture/index.html nabe@sml.k.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2 1. 10/ 4 2. 10/11 3. 10/18 1 4. 10/25 2 5. 11/ 1 6. 11/ 8 7. 11/15 8. 11/22 9. 11/29 10. 12/ 6 1 11. 12/13
More informationDirac 38 5 Dirac 4 4 γ µ p µ p µ + m 2 = ( p µ γ µ + m)(p ν γ ν + m) (5.1) γ = p µ p ν γ µ γ ν p µ γ µ m + mp ν γ ν + m 2 = 1 2 p µp ν {γ µ, γ ν } + m
Dirac 38 5 Dirac 4 4 γ µ p µ p µ + m 2 p µ γ µ + mp ν γ ν + m 5.1 γ p µ p ν γ µ γ ν p µ γ µ m + mp ν γ ν + m 2 1 2 p µp ν {γ µ, γ ν } + m 2 5.2 p m p p µ γ µ {, } 10 γ {γ µ, γ ν } 2η µν 5.3 p µ γ µ + mp
More information/ Christopher Essex Radiation and the Violation of Bilinearity in the Thermodynamics of Irreversible Processes, Planet.Space Sci.32 (1984) 1035 Radiat
/ Christopher Essex Radiation and the Violation of Bilinearity in the Thermodynamics of Irreversible Processes, Planet.Space Sci.32 (1984) 1035 Radiation and the Continuing Failure of the Bilinear Formalism,
More information(τ τ ) τ, σ ( ) w = τ iσ, w = τ + iσ (w ) w, w ( ) τ, σ τ = (w + w), σ = i (w w) w, w w = τ w τ + σ w σ = τ + i σ w = τ w τ + σ w σ = τ i σ g ab w, w
S = 4π dτ dσ gg ij i X µ j X ν η µν η µν g ij g ij = g ij = ( 0 0 ) τ, σ (+, +) τ τ = iτ ds ds = dτ + dσ ds = dτ + dσ δ ij ( ) a =, a = τ b = σ g ij δ ab g g ( +, +,... ) S = 4π S = 4π ( i) = i 4π dτ dσ
More informationprime number theorem
For Tutor MeBio ζ Eite by kamei MeBio 7.8.3 : Bernoulli Bernoulli 4 Bernoulli....................................................................................... 4 Bernoulli............................................................................
More informationnote1.dvi
(1) 1996 11 7 1 (1) 1. 1 dx dy d x τ xx x x, stress x + dx x τ xx x+dx dyd x x τ xx x dyd y τ xx x τ xx x+dx d dx y x dy 1. dx dy d x τ xy x τ x ρdxdyd x dx dy d ρdxdyd u x t = τ xx x+dx dyd τ xx x dyd
More information_0212_68<5A66><4EBA><79D1>_<6821><4E86><FF08><30C8><30F3><30DC><306A><3057><FF09>.pdf
More information
The Physics of Atmospheres CAPTER :
The Physics of Atmospheres CAPTER 4 1 4 2 41 : 2 42 14 43 17 44 25 45 27 46 3 47 31 48 32 49 34 41 35 411 36 maintex 23/11/28 The Physics of Atmospheres CAPTER 4 2 4 41 : 2 1 σ 2 (21) (22) k I = I exp(
More informationTOP URL 1
TOP URL http://amonphys.web.fc.com/ 1 19 3 19.1................... 3 19.............................. 4 19.3............................... 6 19.4.............................. 8 19.5.............................
More information1 9 v.0.1 c (2016/10/07) Minoru Suzuki T µ 1 (7.108) f(e ) = 1 e β(e µ) 1 E 1 f(e ) (Bose-Einstein distribution function) *1 (8.1) (9.1)
1 9 v..1 c (216/1/7) Minoru Suzuki 1 1 9.1 9.1.1 T µ 1 (7.18) f(e ) = 1 e β(e µ) 1 E 1 f(e ) (Bose-Einstein distribution function) *1 (8.1) (9.1) E E µ = E f(e ) E µ (9.1) µ (9.2) µ 1 e β(e µ) 1 f(e )
More information.2 ρ dv dt = ρk grad p + 3 η grad (divv) + η 2 v.3 divh = 0, rote + c H t = 0 dive = ρ, H = 0, E = ρ, roth c E t = c ρv E + H c t = 0 H c E t = c ρv T
NHK 204 2 0 203 2 24 ( ) 7 00 7 50 203 2 25 ( ) 7 00 7 50 203 2 26 ( ) 7 00 7 50 203 2 27 ( ) 7 00 7 50 I. ( ν R n 2 ) m 2 n m, R = e 2 8πε 0 hca B =.09737 0 7 m ( ν = ) λ a B = 4πε 0ħ 2 m e e 2 = 5.2977
More informationBaker and Schubert (1998) NOTE 1 Baker and Schubert(1998) 1 (subsolar point) 177.4, ( 1). Sp dig subsolar point equator 2.7 dig Np Sun V
Baker and Schubert (1998) NOTE 1 Baker and Schubert(1998) 1 (subsolar point) 177.4, 2.7 2.7 ( 1). Sp 177.3 dig subsolar point equator 2.7 dig Np Sun Venus 1:. 2 (Rayleigh number), ρ u i t + ρu u i j =
More informationQMII_10.dvi
65 1 1.1 1.1.1 1.1 H H () = E (), (1.1) H ν () = E ν () ν (). (1.) () () = δ, (1.3) μ () ν () = δ(μ ν). (1.4) E E ν () E () H 1.1: H α(t) = c (t) () + dνc ν (t) ν (), (1.5) H () () + dν ν () ν () = 1 (1.6)
More informationy = x x R = 0. 9, R = σ $ = y x w = x y x x w = x y α ε = + β + x x x y α ε = + β + γ x + x x x x' = / x y' = y/ x y' =
y x = α + β + ε =,, ε V( ε) = E( ε ) = σ α $ $ β w ( 0) σ = w σ σ y α x ε = + β + w w w w ε / w ( w y x α β ) = α$ $ W = yw βwxw $β = W ( W) ( W)( W) w x x w x x y y = = x W y W x y x y xw = y W = w w
More informationII 1 II 2012 II Gauss-Bonnet II
II 1 II 212 II Gauss-Bonnet II 1 1 1.1......................................... 1 1.2............................................ 2 1.3.................................. 3 1.4.............................................
More informationI A A441 : April 15, 2013 Version : 1.1 I Kawahira, Tomoki TA (Shigehiro, Yoshida )
I013 00-1 : April 15, 013 Version : 1.1 I Kawahira, Tomoki TA (Shigehiro, Yoshida) http://www.math.nagoya-u.ac.jp/~kawahira/courses/13s-tenbou.html pdf * 4 15 4 5 13 e πi = 1 5 0 5 7 3 4 6 3 6 10 6 17
More informationv v = v 1 v 2 v 3 (1) R = (R ij ) (2) R (R 1 ) ij = R ji (3) 3 R ij R ik = δ jk (4) i=1 δ ij Kronecker δ ij = { 1 (i = j) 0 (i
1. 1 1.1 1.1.1 1.1.1.1 v v = v 1 v 2 v 3 (1) R = (R ij ) (2) R (R 1 ) ij = R ji (3) R ij R ik = δ jk (4) δ ij Kronecker δ ij = { 1 (i = j) 0 (i j) (5) 1 1.1. v1.1 2011/04/10 1. 1 2 v i = R ij v j (6) [
More informationTOP URL 1
TOP URL http://amonphys.web.fc2.com/ 1 6 3 6.1................................ 3 6.2.............................. 4 6.3................................ 5 6.4.......................... 6 6.5......................
More information(e ) (µ ) (τ ) ( (ν e,e ) e- (ν µ,µ ) µ- (ν τ,τ ) τ- ) ( ) ( ) ( ) (SU(2) ) (W +,Z 0,W ) * 1) [ ] [ ] [ ] ν e ν µ ν τ e µ τ, e R,µ R,τ R (2.1a
1 2 2.1 (e ) (µ ) (τ ) ( (ν e,e ) e- (ν µ,µ ) µ- (ν τ,τ ) τ- ) ( ) ( ) ( ) (SU(2) ) (W +,Z 0,W ) * 1) [ ] [ ] [ ] ν e ν µ ν τ e µ τ, e R,µ R,τ R (2.1a) L ( ) ) * 2) W Z 1/2 ( - ) d u + e + ν e 1 1 0 0
More information73
73 74 ( u w + bw) d = Ɣ t tw dɣ u = N u + N u + N 3 u 3 + N 4 u 4 + [K ] {u = {F 75 u δu L σ (L) σ dx σ + dσ x δu b δu + d(δu) ALW W = L b δu dv + Aσ (L)δu(L) δu = (= ) W = A L b δu dx + Aσ (L)δu(L) Aσ
More information反D中間子と核子のエキゾチックな 束縛状態と散乱状態の解析
.... D 1 in collaboration with 1, 2, 1 RCNP 1, KEK 2 . Exotic hadron qqq q q Θ + Λ(1405) etc. uudd s? KN quasi-bound state? . D(B)-N bound state { { D D0 ( cu) B = D ( cd), B = + ( bu) B 0 ( bd) D(B)-N
More informationZ: Q: R: C: sin 6 5 ζ a, b
Z: Q: R: C: 3 3 7 4 sin 6 5 ζ 9 6 6............................... 6............................... 6.3......................... 4 7 6 8 8 9 3 33 a, b a bc c b a a b 5 3 5 3 5 5 3 a a a a p > p p p, 3,
More informationx y x-y σ x + τ xy + X σ y B = + τ xy + Y B = S x = σ x l + τ xy m S y = σ y m + τ xy l σ x σ y τ xy X B Y B S x S y l m δu δv [ ( σx δu + τ )
1 8 6 No-tension 1. 1 1.1................................ 1 1............................................ 5.1 - [B].................................. 5................................. 6.3..........................................
More informationN/m f x x L dl U 1 du = T ds pdv + fdl (2.1)
23 2 2.1 10 5 6 N/m 2 2.1.1 f x x L dl U 1 du = T ds pdv + fdl (2.1) 24 2 dv = 0 dl ( ) U f = T L p,t ( ) S L p,t (2.2) 2 ( ) ( ) S f = L T p,t p,l (2.3) ( ) U f = L p,t + T ( ) f T p,l (2.4) 1 f e ( U/
More informationGmech08.dvi
145 13 13.1 13.1.1 0 m mg S 13.1 F 13.1 F /m S F F 13.1 F mg S F F mg 13.1: m d2 r 2 = F + F = 0 (13.1) 146 13 F = F (13.2) S S S S S P r S P r r = r 0 + r (13.3) r 0 S S m d2 r 2 = F (13.4) (13.3) d 2
More informationOHP.dvi
t 0, X X t x t 0 t u u = x X (1) t t 0 u X x O 1 1 t 0 =0 X X +dx t x(x,t) x(x +dx,t). dx dx = x(x +dx,t) x(x,t) (2) dx, dx = F dx (3). F (deformation gradient tensor) t F t 0 dx dx X x O 2 2 F. (det F
More information20 9 19 1 3 11 1 3 111 3 112 1 4 12 6 121 6 122 7 13 7 131 8 132 10 133 10 134 12 14 13 141 13 142 13 143 15 144 16 145 17 15 19 151 1 19 152 20 2 21 21 21 211 21 212 1 23 213 1 23 214 25 215 31 22 33
More informationUndulator.dvi
X X 1 1 2 Free Electron Laser: FEL 2.1 2 2 3 SACLA 4 SACLA [1]-[6] [7] 1: S N λ [9] XFEL OHO 13 X [8] 2 2.1 2(a) (c) z y y (a) S N 90 λ u 4 [10, 11] Halbach (b) 2: (a) (b) (c) (c) 1 2 [11] B y = n=1 B
More informationK E N Z OU
K E N Z OU 11 1 1 1.1..................................... 1.1.1............................ 1.1..................................................................................... 4 1.........................................
More informationdynamics-solution2.dvi
1 1. (1) a + b = i +3i + k () a b =5i 5j +3k (3) a b =1 (4) a b = 7i j +1k. a = 14 l =/ 14, m=1/ 14, n=3/ 14 3. 4. 5. df (t) d [a(t)e(t)] =ti +9t j +4k, = d a(t) d[a(t)e(t)] e(t)+ da(t) d f (t) =i +18tj
More informationZ: Q: R: C: 3. Green Cauchy
7 Z: Q: R: C: 3. Green.............................. 3.............................. 5.3................................. 6.4 Cauchy..................... 6.5 Taylor..........................6...............................
More informationA
A04-164 2008 2 13 1 4 1.1.......................................... 4 1.2..................................... 4 1.3..................................... 4 1.4..................................... 5 2
More information19 σ = P/A o σ B Maximum tensile strength σ % 0.2% proof stress σ EL Elastic limit Work hardening coefficient failure necking σ PL Proportional
19 σ = P/A o σ B Maximum tensile strength σ 0. 0.% 0.% proof stress σ EL Elastic limit Work hardening coefficient failure necking σ PL Proportional limit ε p = 0.% ε e = σ 0. /E plastic strain ε = ε e
More informationAC Modeling and Control of AC Motors Seiji Kondo, Member 1. q q (1) PM (a) N d q Dept. of E&E, Nagaoka Unive
AC Moeling an Control of AC Motors Seiji Kono, Member 1. (1) PM 33 54 64. 1 11 1(a) N 94 188 163 1 Dept. of E&E, Nagaoka University of Technology 163 1, Kamitomioka-cho, Nagaoka, Niigata 94 188 (a) 巻数
More information128 3 II S 1, S 2 Φ 1, Φ 2 Φ 1 = { B( r) n( r)}ds S 1 Φ 2 = { B( r) n( r)}ds (3.3) S 2 S S 1 +S 2 { B( r) n( r)}ds = 0 (3.4) S 1, S 2 { B( r) n( r)}ds
127 3 II 3.1 3.1.1 Φ(t) ϕ em = dφ dt (3.1) B( r) Φ = { B( r) n( r)}ds (3.2) S S n( r) Φ 128 3 II S 1, S 2 Φ 1, Φ 2 Φ 1 = { B( r) n( r)}ds S 1 Φ 2 = { B( r) n( r)}ds (3.3) S 2 S S 1 +S 2 { B( r) n( r)}ds
More informationE 1/2 3/ () +3/2 +3/ () +1/2 +1/ / E [1] B (3.2) F E 4.1 y x E = (E x,, ) j y 4.1 E int = (, E y, ) j y = (Hall ef
4 213 5 8 4.1.1 () f A exp( E/k B ) f E = A [ k B exp E ] = f k B k B = f (2 E /3n). 1 k B /2 σ = e 2 τ(e)d(e) 2E 3nf 3m 2 E de = ne2 τ E m (4.1) E E τ E = τe E = / τ(e)e 3/2 f de E 3/2 f de (4.2) f (3.2)
More informationPII S (96)
C C R ( 1 Rvw C d m d M.F. Pllps *, P.S. Hp I q G U W C M H P C C f R 5 J 1 6 J 1 A C d w m d u w b b m C d m d T b s b s w b d m d s b s C g u T p d l v w b s d m b b v b b d s d A f b s s s T f p s s
More information