36巻目次.indd
|
|
- ゆりな こいたばし
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 36 12 論 文 知的財産評価と企業価値 岩城康史 ( 関西学院大学大学院 ) 岡田克彦 ( 関西学院大学 ) 要 旨 キーワード 1 はじめに ,000 Griliches et al
2 36 12 Trajtenberg 1990 Weighted Patent Count, WPC Vopel et al Hall et al Lanjouw and Schankerman IPC , Hall et al Tobin Q Lanjouw and Schankerman Hall et al
3 データ ⑴ 使用データ Wisdomain 4 FOCUST-J ,500,297 4,200,280 2,664,975 Needs Financial Quest ⑵ 特許価値データベースの作成 1 4http://
4 /3/301992/4/ , , , /1/ /1/ /4/ /1 1992/4 1 ⑶ 被引用数の算出 Hall et al A B A A A A 9 DCC DCC
5 % i 1 i 10 1 i t DCC i,t DCC DCC i,t p P i,t c Cp,t 1 (1+ δ) t T 0,c t : t t388 T 0,c c t DCC i,t i t P i,t i t p P i,t C p,t t p c C i,t δδ10%/ 3 記述統計量 ⑴ 特許価値ランキング ポートフォリオ DCC 1 DCC = 0 P0 DCC > 0 5 DCC P5 DCC P1 1,699 2 P0 DCC 20%P5P1 P4P5 P DCC DCC DCC ⑵ ランキング ポートフォリオのパフォーマンス DCC P0 P5 6 6
6 36 12 δ δ δ P0 TOPIX 4.23% P1 P5 DCC DCC P5 20 ⑶ 特許価値の変遷 3 DCC DCC DCC
7 36 12 ⑷ DCC ランキング ポートフォリオと業種 DCC 3DCC DCC 4 DCC DCC 8
8 36 12 ⑸ 特許価値に基づくポートフォリオ運用 2 Fama and French 1993 Three Factor Model 10 10http://fdsol.co.jp/ 9
9 36 12 DCC DCC DCC>0 DCC 5 6 P0 P5 DCC DCC 6 α r i,t r f,t M SMB HML α i β i β i SMB t β i HML t ε i r M,t t t= t =388 r i,t t i r M,t t r f,t t SMB t t Small Minus Big HML t t High Minus Low r f,t 4 実証結果 5 Three Factor Model CTPRCalendar Time Portfolio Regression P0 0.39%4.71% DCC > 0 Pcited 0.30% 3.58% α P5 0.32% 3.84% α P0 α P5 α P2 α P2 α 0.26% 3.11% α Spearman s ρ P5 5% P5 SMB 10
10 追加検証 ⑴ 特許価値ファクター (PCITE) による分析 DCCP0 α P5 α P1 P4 α DCC αdcc DCCDCC DCC α r Mr f α r Mr f α r Mr f
11 β M β SMB β HML α PCITEPCITE DCC ManyDCC FewMany Minus Few Three Factor Model PCITE t r p4,t r p5,t r p0,t r p1,t r i,t r f,t M SMB HML α i β i r M,t r f,t β i SMB t β i HML t β PCITE i PCITE t ε i t t= t388 r i,t t i r M,t t r f,t t SMB t t Small Minus Big HML t t High Minus Low PCITE t t 6 PCITE 1977 r Mr f r Mr f r Mr f r Mr f r Mr f 12
12 SMB PCITE ⑵ 追加検証の結果 PCITE 7 PCITE 3 β M β SMB β HML PCITE Three Factor Model α PCITE P0 β SMB P0P2P5 β HML PCITE 3 β PCITE α 0 R 2 Three Factor Model PCITE Three Factor Model α P1 P4 α DCC PCITE β PCITE Spearman s ρ おわりに DCC , DCC DCC
13 αdcc DCCDCC DCC α r Mr f α r Mr f α r Mr f 謝辞
14 36 12 ANU B 16H03668 CREST 参考文献 [1] Griliches, Zvi, Ariel Pakes, and Bronwyn H. Hall 1986The value of patents as indicators of inventive activity, NBER Working Paper Series, No [2] Fama, Eugene F. and Kenneth R. French 1993Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds, Journal of financial economics, Vol. 33, No. 1, pp [3] Hall, Bronwyn H., Adam B. Jaffe, and Manuel Trajtenberg 2005Market value and patent citations, RAND Journal of economics, pp [4] Lanjouw, Jean O. and Mark Schankerman 2004Patent quality and research productivity: Measuring innovation with multiple indicators, The Economic Journal, Vol. 114, No. 495, pp [5] Trajtenberg, M. 1990A Penny for your Quotes. Patent Citations and the Value of Innovation, RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp [6] Vopel, Katrin, Frederic M. Scherer, Francis Narin, and Dietmar Harhoff 1997Citation Frequency and the Value of Patented Innovation, ZEW Discussion Papers. [7] 2014, Vol.97-DNo [8] 2013 RIETI Discussion Paper Series 13-E-052 [9] 2006Vol.2No.3 [10] 2007Fama-French,, No.22, 3-23 [11]
2 / 24
2017 11 9 1 / 24 2 / 24 Solow, 1957 total factor productivity; TFP 5% 経済成長率の要因分解 4% 3% 2.68% 2.51% 2% 1% 0% 1.63% 1.50% 0.34% 0.42% 0.55% 0.97% 1.14% 0.86% 0.13% -0.59% -0.59% -0.09% 0.01% -1% 1970-80
More information1 CAPM: I-,,, I- ( ) 1 I- I- I- ( CAPM) I- CAPM I- 1 I- Jensen Fama-French 3 I- Fama-French 3 I- Fama-MacBeth I- SMB-FL, HML-FL Fama-MacBeth 1 Fama-Fr
1 CAPM: I-,,, I- ( ) 1 I- I- I- ( CAPM) I- CAPM I- 1 I- Jensen Fama-French 3 I- Fama-French 3 I- Fama-MacBeth I- SMB-FL, HML-FL Fama-MacBeth 1 Fama-French (FF) 3 [5] (Capital Asset Pricing Model; CAPM
More information-2 -
-1 - -2 - ⑴ ⑵ -3 - ⑶ -4 - ⑴ ⑵ ⑶ -5 - ⑷ 6,268 16 23,256,247.299 39.48 8,385. 34 35 2 2,117. 34 4 3,936 8 16,544,761.1 28.8 5,625. 927 35 14 1,689. 927 6 872 6 7,765,329.122 13.18 3,83. 554 17 7 2,211. 554
More information0 001212 112468 1 10 2 11 12 13 3 14 15 ⑴ ⑵ ⑴ ⑵ ⑴ ⑵ ⑴ 4 ⑵ 5 6 ⑴ ⑴ ⑴ ⑵ 7 ⑶ ⑷ ⑵ ⑴ 8 ⑵ ⑴ 9 ⑴ ⑵ ⑴ ⑴ ⑵ ⑶ ⑷ ⑴ ⑵ ⑴ ⑵ ⑵ 10 11 ⑷ ⑴ ⑵ ⑶ ⑵ ⑷ ⑸ ⑴ ⑴ ⑵ ⑴ ⑵ ⑶ 12 ⑵ ⑵ ⑴ ⑵ ⑶ ⑴ ⑵ 13 ⑶ ⑴ ⑵ ⑴ ⑵ ⑴ 14 ⑴ ⑵ ⑶ ⑷ ⑴ ⑵ ⑴ ⑵ ⑵ 15
More informationI- Fama-French 3, Idiosyncratic (I- ) I- ( ) 1 I- I- I- 1 I- I- Jensen Fama-French 3 SMB-FL, HML-FL I- Fama-French 3 I- Fama-MacBeth Fama-MacBeth I- S
I- Fama-French 3, Idiosyncratic (I- ) I- ( ) 1 I- I- I- 1 I- I- Jensen Fama-French 3 SMB-FL, HML-FL I- Fama-French 3 I- Fama-MacBeth Fama-MacBeth I- SMB-FL, HML-FL Fama-MacBeth 2, 3, 5 I- HML-FL 1 Fama-French
More information⑴ ⑵ ⑶
- 108 - ⑴ ⑵ ⑶ ⑴ ⑵ ⑶ ⑷ - 110 - ⑴ ⑵ ⑶ - 111 - ⑷ ⑴ ⑸ ⑹ ⑵ ⑶ - 112 - ⑴ ⑵ ⑶ ⑷ ⑴ ⑵ ⑶ ⑷ ⑴ ⑵ - 115 - - 116 - - 117 - - 118 - - 119 - - 120 - ⑴ - ⑴ ⑴ ⑵ ⑴ ⑵ ⑵ ⑴ ⑵ ⑴ ⑵ - 122 - - 123 - ⑴ ⑵ ⑴ ⑵ ⑶ - 124 - ⑷ - 125 -
More information⑴ ⑵ ⑶
- 108 - ⑴ ⑵ ⑶ ⑴ ⑶ ⑵ ⑷ ⑴ ⑵ - 110 - ⑶ - 111 - ⑷ ⑴ ⑸ ⑹ ⑵ ⑶ - 112 - ⑴ ⑵ ⑶ ⑷ ⑴ ⑵ ⑶ ⑷ ⑴ ⑵ - 115 - - 116 - - 117 - - 118 - ⑴ - 119 - - 120 - ⑴ ⑴ ⑵ ⑴ ⑵ ⑵ - 121 - ⑴ ⑵ ⑴ ⑵ - 122 - - 123 - ⑴ ⑵ ⑴ ⑵ - 124 - ⑶ - 125
More information最適電源構成モデルを用いた卸電力取引市場の経済厚生の評価分析
RIETI Discussion Paper Series 07-J-044 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
More information123 ( 17 120 18 ) ( - 1 - - 2 - ⑴ ⑵ - 3 - - 4 - ⑴ - 5 - ⑵ - 6 - ⑶ - 7 - ⑴ ⑵ ⑶ - 8 - - 9 - - 10 - - 11 - ⑴ ⑵ ⑶ - 12 - ⑴ - 13 - ⑵ 12-14 - - 15 - - 16 - - 17 - - 18 - ⑴ ⑵ - 19 - ⑴ ⑵ ⑶ - 20 - ⑷ ⑸ ⑹ - 21 -
More information2 ( 178 9)
( 1,876.58 km2) 98 ( 11 ) ( 21 ) 4 17 (8 9 ) 28 6 1? H25.12 11,998 489.5 H26.12 13,392 111.6% 565.5 115.5% H27.12 13,828 103.3% 476.8 84.3% H25.12 84 4.5 H26.12 132 157.1% 5 111.1% H27.12 95 72.0 2.56
More information281
m3 m3 m3 280 281 m3 m3 282 283 ⑴ ⑵ m3 m3 m3 m3 m3 m3 m3 m3 m3 m3 284 ⑵ m3 m3 m3 m3 m3 m3 m3 m3 m3 m3 ⑶ ⑷ 285 ⑴ 286 ⑵ ⑶ 287 (1) 92.3 288 289 (2) 40,700 () () () () () () () () () () () ( ) () () () () (ha)
More information人工知能学会研究会資料 SIG-FPAI-B Predicting stock returns based on the time lag in information diffusion through supply chain networks 1 1 Yukinobu HA
人工知能学会研究会資料 SIG-FPAI-B508-08 - - Predicting stock returns based on the time lag in information diffusion through supply chain networks 1 1 Yukinobu HAMURO 1 Katsuhiko OKADA 1 1 1 Kwansei Gakuin University
More information⑴ ⑵ ⑶ ⑷ A C B ( D Other A C B ( D 1996/2/1 1996/3/1 1996/6/1 1996/8/1 1996/9/1 1997/3/1 1997/5/1 1997/6/1 1997/6/1 1997/6/1 1997/10/1 1997/10/1 1997/10/1 1997/11/1 1997/11/1
More information2 I- I- (1) 2 I- (2) 2 I- 1 [18] I- I-. 1 I- I- Jensen [11] I- FF 3 I- FF 3 2 2.1 CAPM n ( i = 1,..., n) M t R i,t, i = 1,..., n R M,t ( ) R i,t = r i
1 Idiosyncratic,, Idiosyncratic (I- ) I- 1 I- I- Jensen I- Fama-French 3 I- Fama-French 3 1 Fama-French (FF) 3 [6] (Capital Asset Pricing Model; CAPM [12, 15]) CAPM ( [2, 10, 14, 16]) [18] Idiosyncratic
More informationuntitled
Cross [1973]French [1980] Rogalsk [1984]Arel [1990]Arel [1987]Rozeff and Knney [1974]seasonaltycalendar structure [2004] 12 Half-Year Effect [2004] [1983] [1990]ChanHamao and Lakonshok [1991] Fama and
More informationautocorrelataion cross-autocorrelataion Lo/MacKinlay [1988, 1990] (A)
Discussion Paper Series A No.425 2002 2 186-8603 iwaisako@ier.hit-u.ac.jp 14 1 24 autocorrelataion cross-autocorrelataion Lo/MacKinlay [1988, 1990] 1990 12 13 (A) 12370027 13 1 1980 Lo/MacKinlay [1988]
More information082_rev2_utf8.pdf
3 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 1 3 3 3 2008 3 2008 2008 3 2008 2008, 1 5 Lo and MacKinlay (1990a) de Jong and Nijman (1997) Cohen et al. (1983) Lo and MacKinlay (1990a b) Cohen et al. (1983) de Jong and Nijman (1997)
More information1 Nelson-Siegel Nelson and Siegel(1987) 3 Nelson-Siegel 3 Nelson-Siegel 2 3 Nelson-Siegel 2 Nelson-Siegel Litterman and Scheinkman(199
Nelson-Siegel Nelson-Siegel 1992 2007 15 1 Nelson and Siegel(1987) 2 FF VAR 1996 FF B) 1 Nelson-Siegel 15 90 1 Nelson and Siegel(1987) 3 Nelson-Siegel 3 Nelson-Siegel 2 3 Nelson-Siegel 2 Nelson-Siegel
More information1 1 1 [2000]
* 2000 7 26 1 1 1 [2000] 1 2 1 2 2 1 B to C 250000 億円 200000 日本米国 213,200 150000 100000 50000 0 153,600 106,900 71,100 66,620 42,700 43,860 22,500 26,940 15,340 645 3,360 7,730 1998 年 1999 年 2000 年 2001
More informationAutumn 06 1 2005 100 100 1 100 1 2003 2005 10 2003 2005 2
2005 25-2 17 395.6 149.1 1 2004 2 2003p.13 3 Autumn 06 1 2005 100 100 1 100 1 2003 2005 10 2003 2005 2 Vol. 42 No. 2 2 100 20052005 2002 20052005 3 2005 10 1 II III IV 1 1 1 2 1 4 15-2 30 4,091 54.5 2
More information精神障害者ホームヘルプサービスにおける教育の充実化
1987 62 1993 1999 11 2002 14 1999 11 2002 14 12 7 2 1 disease impairment disability handicap WHO 1980 1999 11 1,530 4,020 2002 14 1995 1998 2 10 2000 12 2003 15 1991 1994 51 1997 1998 10 3,261 ⑴ 3 p.82
More information1 911 9001030 9:00 A B C D E F G H I J K L M 1A0900 1B0900 1C0900 1D0900 1E0900 1F0900 1G0900 1H0900 1I0900 1J0900 1K0900 1L0900 1M0900 9:15 1A0915 1B0915 1C0915 1D0915 1E0915 1F0915 1G0915 1H0915 1I0915
More information1
1 ⑴ ⑵ ⑶ ⑷ ⑴ ⑵ ⑶ ⑷ ⑴ ⑵ ⑶ ⑷ ⑸ ⑹ ⑴ ⑵ ⑶ ⑷ ⑴ ⑵ ⑶ ⑷ ⑴ ⑵ ⑶ ⑷ ⑸ ⑴ ⑵ ⑶ ⑷ ⑸ 21 700 21-1 - 2006 18 2015 27 10-2 - ⑴ WTO 2002 14 1 7 1500 7 2010 10 2020 16 11.4% 21 2010 1000 21 2003 15 7 VJC ⑵ 17 2004 16 2.00 5%
More information....671-......3.Z...QXD (Page 1)
http://www.mhlw.go.jp/topics///tp- /.html , ..,,, .......... p. p. p. p. p. p. p. p. p http://bktp.org/news/. pp.- pp. -. pp. -. pp.-. COE pp.-. pp.-. pp.-. pp. -. pp.-. pp.-. ESRI Discussion
More informationuntitled
IT (1, horiike@ml.me.titech.ac.jp) (1, jun-jun@ms.kagu.tus.ac.jp) 1. 1-1 19802000 2000ITIT IT IT TOPIX (%) 1TOPIX 2 1-2. 80 80 ( ) 2004/11/26 S-PLUS 2 1-3. IT IT IT IT 2. 2-1. a. b. (Size) c. B/M(Book
More informationfiúŁÄ”s‘ê‡ÌŁª”U…−…X…N…v…„…~…A…•‡Ì ”s‘ê™´›ß…−…^†[…fiŠ‚ª›Âfl’«
2016/3/11 Realized Volatility RV 1 RV 1 Implied Volatility IV Volatility Risk Premium VRP 1 (Fama and French(1988) Campbell and Shiller(1988)) (Hodrick(1992)) (Lettau and Ludvigson (2001)) VRP (Bollerslev
More informationNo. 34 ⑴ 文 化 研 究 と 文 学 研 究
論 文 現 代 中 国 におけるフェミニズムと 文 化 研 究 桑 島 由 美 子 要 旨 90 80 75 No. 34 ⑴ 文 化 研 究 と 文 学 研 究 1982 80 90 1989 1 80 1917 49 1989 2 76 萦 90 80 80 19 10 80 90 3 77 No. 34 80 90 ⑵ 新 左 派 理 論 とエリート 文 化 80 90 80 1997 4 78
More informationuntitled
2007 2 * (i) (ii) 2006 7 1999 2 2000 8 1 (2003) Oda and Ueda (2005) 2005 Kimura and Small(2006) Iwamura, Shiratsuka and Watanabe (2006) (2006) 3 (i) (ii) (iii) 2 2 3 4 2.1 (2003) (2005) 1) (i) (ii) (i)
More informationkl l ml l l l ml ml ml ml ml ml ml ⑴ ⑴ ⑴ ⑴ ⑴ l l l l ⑵ ⑵ ⑵ l l ⑶ l ⑶ l ⑵ l ⑵ ⑶ l ⑷ l l l l ⑶ ⑶ l l l l ⑷ ⑷ l l l ml ml ml ml ml ml ml ml ml ml ml ml ml ml ml ⒈ ⒉ ⒊ ⒋ ⒈ ⒉ ⒊ ⒋ ⒈ ⒉ ⑴ ⑵ ⒊ ⒋ ⒈ ⒉ ⒊
More information財政赤字の経済分析:中長期的視点からの考察
1998 1999 1998 1999 10 10 1999 30 (1982, 1996) (1997) (1977) (1990) (1996) (1997) (1996) Ihori, Doi, and Kondo (1999) (1982) (1984) (1987) (1993) (1997) (1998) CAPM 1980 (time inconsistency) Persson, Persson
More informationMicrosoft Word - 1表紙
26 -15 - -5 5 15 2-22 78-125 -85 19-25 -22 54 34 12 193 182 195-19 68 ⑴ ⑵ ⑴ ⑵ ⑶ ⑷ ⑴ ⑵ ⑶ ⑷ ⑸ ⑴ 2 3 4 5 6 7 17.8 31.7.2 2.9 23.4 3.8 49.7 63.6 8.3 6.1 7.3 14.2 4.5 15.5 7.4 6.6 15.4 13.9 7.7
More informationL Y L( ) Y0.15Y 0.03L 0.01L 6% L=(10.15)Y 108.5Y 6%1 Y y p L ( 19 ) [1990] [1988] 1
1. 1-1 00 001 9 J-REIT 1- MM CAPM 1-3 [001] [1997] [003] [001] [1999] [003] 1-4 0 . -1 18 1-1873 6 1896 L Y L( ) Y0.15Y 0.03L 0.01L 6% L=(10.15)Y 108.5Y 6%1 Y y p L 6 1986 ( 19 ) -3 17 3 18 44 1 [1990]
More informationSNAと家計調査における貯蓄率の乖離-日本の貯蓄率低下の要因-
RIETI Discussion Paper Series 10-J-003 RIETI Discussion Paper Series 10-J-003 2009 年 12 月 SNA と家計調査における貯蓄率の乖離 - 日本の貯蓄率低下の要因 - 宇南山卓 ( 神戸大学大学院経済学研究科 ) 要 旨 SNA と家計調査から計算される家計貯蓄率の乖離の原因を明らかにし 日本の貯蓄率の低下の原因を考察した
More informationuntitled
2 book conference 1990 2003 14 Repeated Cross-Section Data 1 M1,M2 M1 Sekine(1998) Repeated Cross-Section Data 1 1. (1989), Yoshida and Rasche(1990), Rasche(1990), 19921997, Fujiki and Mulligan(1996),
More information物価変動の決定要因について ― 需給ギャップと物価変動の関係の国際比較を中心に―
NAIRU NAIRU NAIRU GDPGDP NAIRUNon- Accelerating Inflation Rate of Unemployment GDP GDP NAIRU Lown and RichFisher, Mahadeva and Whitley raw materials G NAIRUTurnerFai WatanabeNAIRU Watanabe nested NAIRU
More information日本の世帯属性別貯蓄率の動向について:アップデートと考察
RIETI Discussion Paper Series 18-J-024 RIETI Discussion Paper Series 18-J-024 2018 年 8 日本の世帯属性別貯蓄率の動向について : アップデートと考察 1 宇南 卓 ( 経済産業研究所 ) 野太郎 ( 信州 学 ) 要 旨 全国消費実態調査 家計調査 家計消費状況調査を補完的に利用することでマクロ統計と整合的な貯蓄率のデータを構築した宇南山
More information20 20 21 3 ... 1... 3... 4... 18... 18... 19... 20... 20... 20... 22... 25... 25... 27... 33... 33... 33... 39... 45... 45... 51... 57... 62... 62... 68... 71... 71... 71... 71... 71... 71... 71... 72...
More information高齢化とマクロ投資比率―国際パネルデータを用いた分析―
196 2017 * ** ** ** ** 160 2 2 JEL Classification Codes E21, E22, J11 Keywords * ESRI 28 ESRI 29 3 17 ESRI ** 115 196 Population Aging and Domestic Investment An Analysis Using International Panel Data
More information税制改正にともなう家計の所得弾性値 : 高齢者パネルデータによる実証分析
Kwansei Gakuin University Rep Title Author(s) 税制改正にともなう家計の所得弾性値 : 高齢者パネルデータによる実証分析 Uemura, Toshiyuki, 上村, 敏之 ; Kitamura Takayuki, 金田, 陸幸 Citation 経済学論究, 69(4): 1-16 Issue Date 2016-3-20 URL http://hdl.handle.net/10236/14671
More information448 Vol. 44 No 図
Spring 09 447 概要 2004 1 2 I はじめに 19 2007 1. 34 2006 1. 32 90 1 90 Galor and Weil 1996 1996 1999 90 Sleebos 2003 Apps and Rees 2004 Martínez and Iza 2004 448 Vol. 44 No. 4 2. 20 2. 00 1. 80 1. 60 1. 40
More information,255 7, ,355 4,452 3,420 3,736 8,206 4, , ,992 6, ,646 4,
30 8 IT 28 1,260 3 1 11. 1101. 1102. 1103. 1 3 1,368.3 3 1,109.8 p.5,p.7 2 9,646 4,291 14.5% 10,p.11 3 3,521 8 p.13 45-49 40-44 50-54 019 5 3 1 2,891 3 6 1 3 95 1 1101 1102 1103 1101 1102 1103 1 6,255
More informationHIV/AIDS HIV/AIDS 1 5
Vol.32 Aug.2004 http://hc3.seikyou.ne.jp/home/a-w-f/ E-mail: a-w-f@mc3.seikyou.ne.jp TEL/FAX 092-715-4119 815-8619 38 HIV/AIDS HIV/AIDS 1 5 HIV/AIDS 1 HIV/AIDS HIV/AIDS, 28 100 HIV/AIDS HIV/AIDS HIV/AIDS
More information02.„o“φiflì„㙃fic†j
X-12-ARIMA Band-PassDECOMP HP X-12-ARIMADECOMP HPBeveridge and Nelson DECOMP X-12-ARIMA Band-PassHodrick and PrescottHP DECOMPBeveridge and Nelson M CD X ARIMA DECOMP HP Band-PassDECOMP Kiyotaki and Moore
More information屋外広告物のしおり
2 1 ⑴ 2 ⑵ 3 ⑴ ⑵ 4 5 ⑴ ⑵ 6 ⑶ 7 ⑴ ⑵ ⑶ 8 ⑷ ⑸ ⑴ ⑵ 9 10 11 ⑴ ⑵ 12 13 14 15 16 17 ⑶ 18 ⑴ ⑵ ⑶ 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 ⑴ 10 ⑵ ⑴ 28 ⑶ ⑴ ⑴ ⑴ ⑵ 29 ⑶ ⑷ ⑸ 30 ⑹ ⑺ ⑻ ⑼ ⑽ ⑾ 31 ⑴ ⑵ ⑶ ⑷ 32 ⑴ ⑵ 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40
More information28_04_斎藤正章.indd
37 2820103743,. 282010.3743 純 粋 持 株 会 社 における 経 営 管 理 上 の 課 題 1 2 ABSTR ACT...... 1 2 1 38 2 1 1 3 2 1 1 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 1 1992.269 39 1 1 1 2 9 1 2 3 123 13 2 1995.268 40,.1995 3 10, et al.1995 2 1950 2
More informationuntitled
2011 59 1 67 87 c 2011 2010 9 24 2011 1 25 1 26 unbiaseness regression unbiaseness regression 1. Kyle 1985 inicative quote Biais et al. 1999 unbiaseness regression Cao et al. 2000 Mahavan an Panchapagesan
More information1990年代以降の日本の経済変動
1990 * kenichi.sakura@boj.or.jp ** hitoshi.sasaki@boj.or.jp *** masahiro.higo@boj.or.jp No.05-J-10 2005 12 103-8660 30 * ** *** 1990 2005 12 1990 1990 1990 2005 11 2425 BIS E-mail: kenichi.sakura@boj.or.jp
More informationVol.8 No (July 2015) 2/ [3] stratification / *1 2 J-REIT *2 *1 *2 J-REIT % J-REIT J-REIT 6 J-REIT J-REIT 10 J-REIT *3 J-
Vol.8 No.2 1 9 (July 2015) 1,a) 2 3 2012 1 5 2012 3 24, 2013 12 12 2 1 2 A Factor Model for Measuring Market Risk in Real Estate Investment Hiroshi Ishijima 1,a) Akira Maeda 2 Tomohiko Taniyama 3 Received:
More information1 2 2005 1983 1 ()1984 2 1947 1950 19791996 1
KEO Discussion Paper No.104 19451947 * ** 2006 11 19451947 * ** 1 2 2005 1983 1 ()1984 2 1947 1950 19791996 1 4 A A A A A 3 3 1990 19952003A2003B 4 2 198719941997 1995 1995 3 5 6 1998: 30 40 19701992 7
More information⑴ ⑵ ⑶ ⑷ ⑸ ⑹ ⑺ ⑻ ⑼ ⑽ ⑴ ⑵ ⑶ ⑷ ⑸ ⑹ ⑺ ⑻ ⑼ ⑽ ⑾ ⑿ ⒀ ⒁ ⒂ ( ), (53.1%) (61.8%) (30.9%) 84.1% 95.7% 13.7% 11.3% 3.3% 4.7% 4.0% 74.6% 6.7 ( ) 64.5% 752 57.1% 565 42.9% 1317 100.0% 90.3% 47.4%52.6% 63.4%36.6%
More information01_杵渕.indd
1 直 線 的 キャリア 論 の 限 界 日 本 人 の 身 体 観 から 杵 渕 友 子 19571992 19751977 2 16 1990 1949 3 1994 4 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 300 18 5 201319 19 20 21 22 23 24 6 25 26 1648 19 7 27 28 29 8 30 31 9 32 33 105 10 34 35
More informationCOE-RES Discussion Paper Series Center of Excellence Project The Normative Evaluation and Social Choice of Contemporary Economic Systems Graduate Scho
COE-RES Discussion Paper Series Center of Excellence Project The Normative Evaluation and Social Choice of Contemporary Economic Systems Graduate School of Economics and Institute of Economic Research
More informationHi-Stat Discussion Paper Series No.248 東京圏における 1990 年代以降の住み替え行動 住宅需要実態調査 を用いた Mixed Logit 分析 小林庸平行武憲史 March 2008 Hitotsubashi University Research Unit
Hi-Stat Discussion Paper Series No.248 東京圏における 1990 年代以降の住み替え行動 住宅需要実態調査 を用いた Logit 分析 小林庸平行武憲史 March 2008 Hitotsubashi University Research Unit for Statistical Analysis in Social Sciences A 21st-Century
More informationビールと発泡酒の税率と経済厚生
RIETI Discussion Paper Series 12-J-019 RIETI Discussion Paper Series 12-J-019 2012 年 6 月 ビールと 発 泡 酒 の 税 率 と 経 済 厚 生 * 慶 田 昌 之 ( 立 正 大 学 ) 要 旨 本 稿 では, 近 年 ビール 系 飲 料 として 販 売 されている 発 泡 酒 の 登 場 によって 発 生 している
More informationD F I CP (equity finance) CP (debt finance) ( )
1990 2001 2 26 1 1990 1990 1 1992 4 D F I 50 3 26000 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 2 CP (equity finance) CP (debt finance) 1960 1995 ( ) 1970 60 2 1970 1990 85 CP (disintermediation) 1995-1998 BIS Hoshi et al (1991) 1990
More information日本株式市場における経済レジームファクターの役割
1818 2012 47-67 47 Takuya Tokunaga, Koichi Miyazaki The University of Electro-Communications 1 David(1997) Veronesi$(1999)$ (2010) Veronesi(1999) Merton(1973) Merton(1973) Lo and Wang(2006) (2008) Lo and
More informationAutumn II III Zon and Muysken 2005 Zon and Muysken 2005 IV II 障害者への所得移転の経済効果 分析に用いるデータ
212 Vol. 44 No. 2 I はじめに 2008 1 2 Autumn 08 213 II III Zon and Muysken 2005 Zon and Muysken 2005 IV II 障害者への所得移転の経済効果 17 18 1 分析に用いるデータ 1 2005 10 12 200 2 2006 9 12 1 1 2 129 35 113 3 1 2 6 1 2 3 4 4 1
More information03.Œk’ì
HRS KG NG-HRS NG-KG AIC Fama 1965 Mandelbrot Blattberg Gonedes t t Kariya, et. al. Nagahara ARCH EngleGARCH Bollerslev EGARCH Nelson GARCH Heynen, et. al. r n r n =σ n w n logσ n =α +βlogσ n 1 + v n w
More information表紙_目次.PDF
JIL 2 1980 vol.3 15 3 1 3 15 18 IT 26 28 33 20 OECD 80 90 (1998) (2000) 2 Aghion et al. (1999) OECD 1970 1 2 70 1980 90 1.1 Kuznets U inverted U-shaped hypothesis GNP U 1 18901940 6 3 Kuznets(1955) (1963)
More informationPowerPoint プレゼンテーション
野球の試合結果と株式収益率の関係 ~ 試合結果が株価変動に与える影響について統計的分析 ~ 九州大学経済学部内田ゼミ有木健人宮崎勝利 2018 年 12 月 1 日 目次 研究背景 研究目的 分析対象と考察概要 仮説 使用データと分析方法 分析 結論 2 はじめに 企業はテレビや新聞 雑誌 インターネットなど様々な情報伝達媒体に広告をだしており それを広告費として計上している 日本において広告は企業価値を高めるという先行研究がある
More information村本 孜71‐89/71‐89
MERITUM RICARDIS OECD https://www.jicpa knk.ne.jp/download/image/index.html EU (intellectual capital rating) BCP OECD IR ex.) ex.) ex.) ex.) http://www.meti.go.jp/policy/intellectual_assets/index.htm (intellectual
More informationTitle 最適年金の理論 Author(s) 藤井, 隆雄 ; 林, 史明 ; 入谷, 純 ; 小黒, 一正 Citation Issue Date Type Technical Report Text Version publisher URL
Title 最適年金の理論 Author(s) 藤井, 隆雄 ; 林, 史明 ; 入谷, 純 ; 小黒, 一正 Citation Issue 2012-06 Date Type Technical Report Text Version publisher URL http://hdl.handle.net/10086/23085 Right Hitotsubashi University Repository
More informationワーク・ライフ・バランス社会の実現と生産性の関係に関する研究(平成21年度)報告書
3 / 57 3 1 20-24 III- 18 A 1 6 65-70 65-69 6 58 III- 18 A 1 65-70 65-69 59 9 8 41 9 59 9 30 9 17 III- 60 III- III- 61 9 1 III- 62 III- 63 30 III- 64 III- 65 III- Separated 66 III- Separated 67 49 III-
More information46−ª3�=4�“ƒ‚S“·‚Ö‡¦
463420101 1. 1989, Yoshida and Rasche1990, Rasche1990, 19921997, Fujiki and Mulligan1996, 1996, Sekine1998, 2001, Fujiki2002, 2003, 2004 Bahmani-Oskooee and Shabsigh1996, Amano and Wirjanto2000, Bahmani-Oskooee
More information研修コーナー
l l l l l l l l l l l α α β l µ l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
More informationアジアの資本移動の変化に関するクラスター分析 アジア域内の証券投資活性化に向けて
* ** 199 1 1996-97 relation * ** Seoul conference China and Emerging Asia: Reorganizing the Global Economy? held by KIEP and Seoul National University 26 5 11-12 Hugh Patrick Yung-Chul Park 26 9 9-1 East
More informationaragciv54mac.dvi
2013 3 25 ( 4 ) Modigliani-Miller(1963) 1 1 1 IRR ( ) NPV IRR NPV IRR NPV IRR 100 EBIT 20 20% τ (1 τ) 20% CC tax = S V ρ S + B V (1 τ)ρ B (1) S B V ρ S CAPM 1 ρ B *1 (1) MM *2 ( ) MM MM ( ) MM (1 τ) 20%
More information