Similar documents


























神戸法学雑誌 66 巻 2 号 1 神戸法学雑誌第六十六巻第二号二〇一六年九月 ALAI JAPAN B






編小説 晩夏 ~


CiNii) において 2004 年 ~2006 年の





















~


227 study




















神戸法学雑誌 63 巻 3 号 27 はじめに


神戸法学雑誌 65 巻 1 号 1 神戸法学雑誌第六十五巻第一号二〇一五年六月 目次


Kobe University Repository : Kernel タイトル Title 著者 Author(s) 掲載誌 巻号 ページ Citation 刊行日 Issue date 資源タイプ Resource Type 版区分 Resource Version 権利 Rights DOI


















113 初めに GDP -

Transcription:

Kobe University Repository : Kernel タイトル Title 著者 Author(s) 掲載誌 巻号 ページ Citation 刊行日 Issue date 資源タイプ Resource Type 版区分 Resource Version 権利 Rights DOI 日韓の対北朝鮮政策をめぐる比較研究 : 政策形成の分岐点はどこだったのか (A Comparative Study of Japan and South Korea Policies towards North Korea : Where was the Turning Point of Policy Making?) 横溝, 未歩 六甲台論集. 国際協力研究編,10:31-50 2009-01 Departmental Bulletin Paper / 紀要論文 publisher JaLCDOI 10.24546/81001009 URL http://www.lib.kobe-u.ac.jp/handle_kernel/81001009 PDF issue: 2018-12-01

2003 8 27 1 1 31

21 2003 4 23 2 2 2006 p.533 32

NPT 2002 33

3 4 5 3, 2005. 4 5 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) Northeast Asia Security Takes; NEASTs 5 2005 http://www.jimin.jp/jimin/jimin/2005_seisaku/120yakusoku/pdf/yakusokutext.pdf 2008.10.4 34

6 2005 7 2006 8 1960 9 2002 2003 10 11 6 2004 123 2004 http://www.komei.or.jp/news/daily/2004/0609_09.html 2007.10.4 2005 2005 http://www.komei.or.jp/policy/policy/pdf/manifest2005.pdf 2008.10.4 7 2005 http://www.dpj.or.jp/policy/manifesto/images/manifesto_2005.pdf 2008.10.4 8 http://www.dpj.or.jp/news/?num=342 2008.10.4 9 1945 1992 2004 pp.124-134 pp.171-181 10 2003.1.22 11 9 http://www5.sdp.or.jp/central/topics/04sanin/seisaku/index.html 2008.10.4 35

2005 12 13 2006 7 41 7 42 41 14 12 2005.8.11 http://www.jcp.or.jp/seisaku/2005/05syuuin_kaku_bunya_org.html 2008.10.4 13 1) 2) 3) 2004.6.2 http://www.jcp.or.jp/giin/senkyo/04_sanin/04seisaku/mokuji.html 2008.10.4 14 2006.10.18 36

15 1950 1988 7 7 1991 1994 15 2002 37

3 2000 2000 6 13 15 16 2002 12 19 16 17 1) 2) 3) 4) 2) 4) 16 2000 17 NGO 16 38

15 18 7000 19 1951 9 8 1950 20 1970 18 15 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) 8) 9) 10) 11) 12) 13) 14) 15) 2003 pp.184 19, 2003.11.1. 20 pp.51-54 39

21 1988 7 7 7 7 7 7 1991 1992 11 5 2002 2001 2001 1 2002 9 17 22 21 1974 7 1989 pp.112-113 22 3 40

1970 1980 23 24 2002 25 2003 pp.199-211 23 2006.11.7 24 2001 8 15 2001 2005 8 15 2006 8 15 2004 2005 3 25 5 5 2006.9.8 41

2006 9 26 26 1954 1991 1993 13 27 2002 28 26 2006 11 27 13 21 2006.11.30 28 42

43

2000 29 72.1% 75.7% 81.9% 49.8% 44.0%4.5% 72.4% 1993 44% % 2004 39% 33% 30 29 55 2000.8.1 30 20 30 20 58 47 50 52 18 2004.1.11 44

90 2000 2000 31 2000 2000 2006 2001 2001 2002 9 17 11 4 31 http://www8.cao.go.jp/survey/index-gai.html 2008.10.5 45

1970 2000 32 9 33 32 2005 16 25 62.9 2005.8.15 33 2003.4.21 46

1998 2001 2000 2000 47

2000 2002 34 34 48

2007 49

A Comparative Study of Japan and South Korea Policies towards North Korea: Where was the Turning Point of Policy Making? Miho YOKOMIZO Abstract The North Korean nuclear development has been a pending problem in the East Asia. The six-party talks on the North Korean nuclear development started in 2003 to find a solution to the subject matter. This paper argues why there are great discrepancies between Japan and South Korea towards North Korea policy in the six-party talks. The summit meetings with Kim Jong-Il, of Kim Dae-Jung in 2000 and Koizumi Junichiro in 2002, become the overriding explanation of this argument. After those meetings, there are some disagreements between Japan and South Korea regarding the personality of Kim Jong-Il and also the state image of North Korea itself. Diverse images formed different public opinions in each country and it profoundly influenced on the policy making process of the two countries. The impact of those differences makes it so difficult to ignore on both ruling and opposition parties of the two countries and the successors of both governments: Roh Moo-Hyeon and Abe Shinzo. This is the main reason that the policies of both countries towards North Korea are contrary. 50