96 SHIBASAKI, Ryuichi WATANABE, Tomihiro KADONO, Takashi 1 6 95 1 ISO 96 23 45 6 7 8 1994 9 OD 2 2.1 2.1.1 1998 1 11 95 2 Vol.7 No.4 2005 Winter 015
1,000km 1.7% 0.0% 0.8% 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 94.4% 0.1% 3.0% 0.3% 0.5% 0.0% 96.2% 1 0.2% 2.8% 0% 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 km 4 1 200212 1 20ft 40ft 54 10 1986 3011994101 40ft 5 40ft20ft 10 20'8'6"High 40'8'6"High 40'9'6"High 6,058mm 12,192mm 12,192mm 19'10" 1/2 40'0" 40'0" 2,438mm8'0" 2,438mm8'0" 2,438mm8'0" 2,591mm8'6" 2,591mm8'6" 2,896mm9'6" 1,790kg 2,870kg 3,000kg 22,210kg 27,610kg 27,480kg 24,000kg 30,480kg 30,480kg 100% 45ft 0.7% 46ft 0.0% 20ft 0.3% 45ft 0.005% 20ft 0.1% 60% 40% 20% 40ft 51.0% 20ft 48.0% 40ft 52.5% 20ft 47.4% 0% 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 km 1 2.1.2 1ISO 20ft 8640ft8640ft 9633 20ft40ft 7,245,194 900,492 3,705 40ft 27.2% 20ft 38.8% 40ft 34.1% 6,649 40ft 19.6% 40ft 25.8% 0.2% 20ft 54.5% 016 Vol.7 No.4 2005 Winter
40ft20ft 20ft 11 2.5m 12.0m 3.8m 12.0m 20.0t 10.0t 5.0t 18.020.0t 25.0% 20.0% 15.0% 10.0% 5.0% 0.0% 40ft 02 24 46 68 810 1012 20ft 1214 1416 1618 1820 2022 40ft 2224 2426 2628 2830 2.2.2 34 25.0% 20.0% 15.0% 10.0% 5.0% 0.0% 40ft 02 24 46 68 810 1012 1214 1416 1618 1820 2.2 11 2.2.1 20ft 40ft 022 2224 2426 2628 2830 2 1 2 1 3 20ft 24t40ft30.48t B B 11 311 B B 2.5m 3.8m4.1m 16.5m 17m 1 2 3 Vol.7 No.4 2005 Winter 017
20ft 40ft 12m 12 17 17m 40ft 17m 4.1 m 20 10 10t 89 25 1014.5 910 26 14.516 3.8 m 1011 27 1617 7.0t 1115 2934* 1724 1515.5 3536* 3.0t 20ft24 15.10.130.48t 8 20 6.5 3.8 811 2527* 13.5 6.513.5 m 1115.5 2936* 13.522.5 3644* 22.530.48 8 20 6.5 9.5t 811 2527 ** 6.513.5 1115.5 2936 4.0t 13.522.5 3644 22.530.48 40ft24t20ft 20.32t 2 3.8m 1 4 3 CD-ROM 12 76,555 3 143 1 31 2.5m16.5m3.8m B 2 018 Vol.7 No.4 2005 Winter
-1.0m /2 2.5m 2.5m 3.8m 3.8m -1 31 B 1 3m 1.5m 3.5m 5.0m 4.0m 4.0m 48 2 4.1m 4.1m 3 3m 1.5m 4.3m 4.3m 0.2m 48 3 4.1m B A B C3 A6 6 6 A 8 65 BA 5,66614,700km C A204 780km 7 km 69,489 149,796 21,336 30.7 42,152 28.1 A 58,168 83.7 98,733 65.9 B 52,502 75.6 84,044 56.1 C 57,964 83.4 97,955 65.4 52,282 75.2 83,194 55.5 Vol.7 No.4 2005 Winter 019
020 Vol.7 No.4 2005 Winter
Vol.7 No.4 2005 Winter 021
4 4.1 13 i ii2 ii 1998 1 Dijkstra 67.65/km ii 4.2 14 3 27 B C 4.3 2 B C C 1 22 1 1 OD 20ft/40ft 45 8 4 20ft 40ft 20ft 40ft 38.1 56.3 62.7 55.1 0.0 44.4 0.0 43.0 2 2 022 Vol.7 No.4 2005 Winter
20ft/40ft 4.4 9 11020 /2 450/ 1 11215/ 2160180/ 2 2 5 20ft 40ft 20ft 40ft 20ft 40ft 20ft 40ft 1,095 1,650 74,569 114,318 4,558 6,914 981 997 5,984 1,297 1,942 82,091 125,215 2,769 4,147 1,323 1,309 1,086 1,629 74,409 113,979 4,551 6,899 941 940 5,915 70 1 1,280 1,920 81,814 124,865 2,770 4,147 1,230 1,228 857 1,573 58,709 110,104 3,591 6,664 743 908 5,295 689 2 1,010 1,855 64,551 120,620 2,185 4,006 971 1,186 419,191 417,775 374,239 1,416 44,952 20ft 40ft 20ft 40ft 20ft 40ft 20ft 40ft 1,182 1,786 76,071 116,572 5,768 8,800 0 0 6,450 1,395 2,087 83,743 127,559 3,542 5,292 0 0 1,166 1,748 75,788 115,971 5,690 8,625 0 0 6,327 123 1 1,365 2,048 83,247 126,932 3,474 5,202 0 0 920 1,689 59,797 112,028 4,490 8,332 0 0 5,664 786 2 1,077 1,978 65,682 122,616 2,741 5,025 0 0 20ft 40ft 20ft 40ft 20ft 40ft 20ft 40ft 1,086 1,632 74,409 114,170 4,551 6,894 941 958 5,965 1,280 1,966 81,814 125,855 2,770 4,148 1,230 1,242 1,086 1,629 74,409 113,979 4,551 6,899 941 940 5,915 50 1 1,280 1,920 81,814 124,865 2,770 4,147 1,230 1,228 1,086 1,533 74,409 107,254 4,551 6,492 941 884 5,705 259 2 1,280 1,807 81,814 117,498 2,770 3,903 1,230 1,156 427,347 424,929 380,710 418,984 417,775 402,903 2,417 46,636 1,209 16,081 20ft 40ft 20ft 40ft 20ft 40ft 20ft 40ft 1,166 1,759 75,788 116,252 5,690 8,678 0 0 6,400 1,365 2,110 83,247 128,095 3,474 5,247 0 0 1,166 1,748 75,788 115,971 5,690 8,625 0 0 6,327 73 1 1,365 2,048 83,247 126,932 3,474 5,202 0 0 1,166 1,645 75,788 109,128 5,690 8,116 0 0 6,103 297 2 1,365 1,927 83,247 119,443 3,474 4,895 0 0 1 426,472 424,929 409,782 1,543 16,690 Vol.7 No.4 2005 Winter 023
OD 1 5.1 122 10758 1 122 8 17 10 OD OD 13,200 /2 4.3/ 1.3/ OD OD6498233.6606.5 1 2 20ft 40ft 20ft 40ft 20ft 40ft 20ft 40ft 13.4 20.2 387.4 588.9 30.9 48.7 11.4 10.2 124.4 36.4 54.4 1,031.7 1,559.6 44.1 64.9 29.2 30.3 13.3 19.9 384.9 583.5 28.2 42.8 13.8 13.8 122.5 1.9 35.7 53.6 1,020.0 1,544.6 38.1 57.1 39.0 38.9 10.5 19.2 303.7 563.7 22.3 41.3 10.9 13.3 109.7 14.7 28.2 51.8 804.8 1,492.1 30.1 55.1 30.7 37.6 3,837 3,805 3,406 32.8 431.9 OD121696.7203.1 20ft 40ft 20ft 40ft 20ft 40ft 20ft 40ft 3.8 5.7 128.8 198.7 12.9 19.9 0.0 0.0 26.5 6.8 10.1 248.7 381.0 12.6 18.6 0.0 0.0 3.7 5.5 127.0 194.7 12.4 18.8 0.0 0.0 25.0 1.4 1 6.3 9.5 239.4 369.0 11.3 16.9 0.0 0.0 2.9 5.3 100.2 188.1 9.8 18.2 0.0 0.0 22.4 4.1 2 5.0 9.2 188.9 356.5 8.9 16.3 0.0 0.0 1,021 989 887 31.7 134.4 024 Vol.7 No.4 2005 Winter
5.2 1 1 2 9 11 8 1 580 22.5 3.8 8 1 2 1 OD 2 20ft OD84155320.5422.6 1 2 20ft 40ft 20ft 40ft 20ft 40ft 20ft 40ft 30.8 48.5 745.6 1,150.2 59.8 90.9 15.4 15.3 206 49.4 77.4 1,102.1 1,687.8 50.2 75.2 24.3 24.3 30.8 46.2 745.6 1,114.8 59.8 90.7 15.4 15.4 201 5.6 49.4 74.1 1,102.1 1,637.8 50.2 75.1 24.3 24.2 30.8 43.5 745.6 1,049.0 59.8 85.3 15.4 14.5 193 12.7 49.4 69.7 1,102.1 1,541.2 50.2 70.7 24.3 22.8 5,041 4,956 4,781 85.8 260.3 OD82153315.5422.5 20ft 40ft 20ft 40ft 20ft 40ft 20ft 40ft 31.2 51.3 747.6 1,185.7 72.5 119.7 0.0 0.0 215 50.3 82.0 1,115.7 1,754.9 60.8 99.1 0.0 0.0 31.2 46.8 747.6 1,117.0 72.5 109.9 0.0 0.0 204 1.1 1 50.3 75.4 1,115.7 1,657.2 60.8 91.1 0.0 0.0 31.2 44.0 747.6 1,051.1 72.5 103.4 0.0 0.0 196 18.3 2 50.3 71.0 1,115.7 1,559.5 60.8 85.7 0.0 0.0 5,156 4,972 4,796 184.3 359.8 Vol.7 No.4 2005 Winter 025
6 OD 1162 4.1m16322 31,300km 11999 21999 16pp.731-741 32000 17pp.677-686 41990 8pp.65-72 52003 203pp.681-689 61989 12pp.473-488 71992 151pp.921-926 82000 91995 102003 11 2003 122002CD-ROM 132000 14 1999 An Analysis of Economic Loss due to Bottlenecks in Domestic Land Transportation Network for International Maritime Container Cargo By Ryuichi SHIBASAKI, Tomihiro WATANABE, Takashi KADONO In domestic land transportation network for international maritime containers, there are many restrictions on full-loaded and high-cube containers. Also, to realize efficient transportation of maritime cargos, it is necessary to implement effectively infrastructure construction projects, considering the linkage between ports and roads. This paper therefore investigates the effect of bottlenecks in the road transportation network, considering international maritime containers. First, the current condition and traffic restriction system on semi-trailer transportation is summarized. Second, three passable road networks are made, according to container types. Bottlenecks in the actual transportation network are then extracted, and economic benefit of their elimination is calculated. Key Words ; international maritime container cargo, hinterland transportation by semi- trailers, benefit of elimination of bottlenecks, full-loaded container, high-cube container 026 Vol.7 No.4 2005 Winter