2

Similar documents
スライド タイトルなし

622 3) 4 6) ) 8) , ,921 40, ) ) 10 11) ) ) ,434 43, ,18

研究報告B


LAGUNA LAGUNA 10 p Water quality of Lake Kamo, Sado Island, northeast Japan, Katsuaki Kanzo 1, Ni


untitled


日本学術会議平成26年9月2日報告1

,281,921 49,288, ,434, ,882, , ,868 13,052,115 14,437,576 51,120,549 49,098,4

* ** Casualties by the 3 June 1991 pyroclastic flow at Unzen volcano Shinichi SUGIMOTO * and Daisuke NAGAI ** Abstract The eruption of Unzen

EPS; EPS Ensemble Prediction System (THORPEX) EPS 10 EPS EPS EPS EPS EPS EPS 1992 (ECMWF) (NCEP) EPS (2002) 1) 2) 3) PDF

bosai-2002.dvi

JMA Numerical Analysis Systems

( ) ( ) 87 ( ) 3 ( 150mg/l) cm cm 50cm a 2.0kg 2.0kg

DISASTER MANAGEMENT IN JAPAN CONTENTS 1 2 The Nation and Its Disasters A Disaster-prone Country 1 The General Disaster Situation Progress in Dis

Microsoft PowerPoint - 09TD :publicwarning(weatherJMA).ppt

広報さかき2006年11月号-18p.indd


bangumi1411


mr0511_01fix.indd

1 発病のとき

perature was about 2.5 Ž higher than that of the control irrespective of wind speed. With increasing wind speeds of more than 1m/s, the leaf temperatu

* Meso- -scale Features of the Tokai Heavy Rainfall in September 2000 Shin-ichi SUZUKI Disaster Prevention Research Group, National R

赤羽パワーポイント copy.ppt

untitled

Table. 20 M6 M M7.0 M M7.6 M M8 M



607_h1h4_0215.indd

10.02EWE51号本文

dpri04.dvi

.. 9 (NAPS9) NAPS km, km, 3 km, 8 (GSM) 64 : / 64 : / 64 : / (UTC) (UTC) (, UTC) 3 : 3 / 3 : 3 / 3 : / (, 6, 8UTC) (, 6, 8UTC) (6, 8UTC) 4 km,

Isogai, T., Building a dynamic correlation network for fat-tailed financial asset returns, Applied Network Science (7):-24, 206,

141_臼井さん1

untitled

Ax001_P001_目次-1.ai


1997年と2005年における建物寿命推計(最終).pmd


Microsoft Word - A0921_Philippines, A0922_China(Typhoon Usagi)(simplified).docx

Fig. 1 Imminence of Tokyo Metropolitan Earthquakes (The committees for technical investigations on countermeasures for Tokyo Metropolitan Earthquakes,



untitled

京都大学防災研究所年報第 60 号 A 平成 29 年 DPRI Annuals, No. 60 A, 2017 Generating Process of the 2016 Kumamoto Earthquake Yoshihisa IIO Synopsis The 2016 Kumamoto e

GEO GLAM等へ向けた稲作等の作況見通し情報の利用

1.4操作マニュアル+ユニット解説

0.3% 10% 4% 0.8% 5% 5% 23% 53%


1

揃 Lag [hour] Lag [day] 35


2016 年熊本地震の余震の確率予測 Probability aftershock forecasting of the M6.5 and M7.3 Kumamoto earthquakes of 2016 東京大学生産技術研究所統計数理研究所東京大学地震研究所 Institute of Indus

Page 1 of 6 B (The World of Mathematics) November 20, 2006 Final Exam 2006 Division: ID#: Name: 1. p, q, r (Let p, q, r are propositions. ) (10pts) (a

endo.PDF


2

of 15 m/s. In the case of Cabinet Office, Government of Japan research, 850,000 houses collapse or are destroyed by fire, and there are 11,000 fatalit

Microsoft PowerPoint - Lecture 1.pptx

<4D F736F F D20D2E5E7E8F1FB E3EEE45FE8F1EFF0>

結語と展望―世界史の全体構図からみた「太平洋戦争」の歴史的意味とその教訓

Microsoft Word - ランチョンプレゼンテーション詳細.doc


Table 1. Assumed performance of a water electrol ysis plant. Fig. 1. Structure of a proposed power generation system utilizing waste heat from factori

untitled

ab ab 234

2005/11/19 THORPEX

倉田.indd

mm mm , ,000 Fig. 1 Locality map of the investigation area NE SW Fi


A Nutritional Study of Anemia in Pregnancy Hematologic Characteristics in Pregnancy (Part 1) Keizo Shiraki, Fumiko Hisaoka Department of Nutrition, Sc

PowerPoint プレゼンテーション

No.51 pp.35 58, 2015 Komazawa Journal of Geography Rivers and Hydrological-Environment of Musashino-Upland in Tokyo Metro. SUMIDA Kiyomi Keywords: Mus

陸域環境研究センター

The Democratic People s Republic of Korea: DPRK GDP G Bergsten Wang,

account4-1.PDF

スライド 1

untitled


阪神5年PDF.PDF

Microsoft Word - NEWホノルル.docx

Microsoft Word - P01_導水路はいらない!愛知の会 会報11号-1 .docx

, , km 9.8km 10.5km 11.9km 14.4km 14.4km 34.1km 3.4km 31.7km 6.2km 7.3k

12 1



untitled

Microsoft Word - 01_表紙

第4回 小平市の文化振興を考える市民委員会

<4D F736F F D2089AB93EA8CA48F43838C837C815B83675F8FAC97D1>

2

渋谷区耐震改修促進計画

2

Microsoft Word - 第8回問題(3級)


1,000m 875m1 6km

Ⅰ.市区町村事例ヒアリング結果の詳細

一太郎 13/12/11/10/9/8 文書

Transcription:

TIGGE * 1 2 1 2 JAMSTEC

2

3

Strategy Global Ens. Forecast Potential Occurrence - Timing ~ O(day) - Location ~ O(100km) time Regional Hi- Res. Forecast - Estimate Quantitatively - Timing ~ O(hr) - Location ~ O(10 km) High Impact Weather Event Occurs! 6

1. Global Hi-Res. Deterministic Forecast Only My Choice! Global Lo-Res. Ensemble Forecast 2. + Regional Hi-Res. Forecast 3. Global Hi-Res. Deterministic Forecast + Regional Hi-Res. Forecast 7

2008 11 2007 2009 10Lupit

2008 11

2008 11

Vietnam : Flood : November 2008 Torrential rainfall in early November in northern and central Vietnam caused severe flooding that left at least 85 people dead, damaged 180,000 houses and devastated over 265,000 hectares of rice and vegetable fields. An estimated 600,000 people were affected. United Nations Office of Coordination for Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) http://ochaonline.un.org/roap/disasterhistory/ tabid/4837/language/ja-jp/default.aspx IRIN http://www.irinnews.org/report.aspx?reportid=81253 EM-DAT http://www.emdat.be/database

Genesis Potential using TIGGE EPSs for Vietnam Flood in Oct. 2008 192hr 216hr TD TD TD TD TD Color Shading: Percentage of Members, which exceed 90 Percentile of Us

2007 3

Genesis Potential using TIGGE EPSs for Gobi Sand Storm in Mar. 2007 96hr Russia Mongolia China Color Shading: Percentage of Members, which exceed 95 Percentile of Us

WMO/WWRP

Strike Probability in 120 km, 4 days CMA MSC ECMWF JMA-W JMA-T KMA NCEP STI UKMO http://tparc.mri-jma.go.jp/cyclone

An Example of the Strike Probability Map

JMA-WEPS Taipei Sinlaku (km)

Lupit 2009 10

Global Deterministic High Resolution Oct. 20-22 2009 ECMWF WWRP JMA

Global Deterministic High Resolution ECMWF Oct. 17-19 2009 WWRP No Recurvature! JMA

WWRP Oct. 20 Oct. 21 Oct. 22 JMA-W JMA-T ECMWF

Oct. 17 Oct. 18 Oct. 19 JMA-W JMA-T WWRP ECMWF Member Spread at Day 5

PDF

Model Representations for Extreme Us

Model Representations for Extreme Us

Model Representations for Extreme Us

Model Representations for Extreme Prcp

Model Representations for Extreme Prcp

Parameter Candidates for Target Disasters Disaster Typhoon Flood Wind, Dust Storm Draught Cold Surge Heat Wave Parameters Us, Ps, Vor850 Us, Precip, Vor850 Us Ts, qs, Precip Ts, T700, Us Ts

Tropical Cyclone ITC=max(P(Us), P(Ps), P(Vor850)) P(Us): Percentage of members, which are above 95 percentile P(Vor850): Percentage of members, which are above 95 percentile P(Ps): Percentage of members, which are below 5 percentile Flood IFL=max(P(Precip), P(Us), P(Vor850)) P(Precip): Percentage of members, which are above 95 percentile P(Us): Percentage of members, which are above 95 percentile P(Vor850): Percentage of members, which are above 95 percentile Wind/Dust Storm IWD=P(Us) P(Us): Percentage of members, which are above 95 percentile

Draught IDR=max(P(Ts), P(qs), P(Precip)) P(Ts): Percentage of members, which are above 95 percentile P(qs): Percentage of members, which are below 5 percentile P(Precip): Percentage of members, which are below 5 percentile Cold Surge in 10-day average ICS=max(P(Ts), P(T700), P(Us)) P(Ts): Percentage of members, which are below 5 percentile P(T700): Percentage of members, which are below 5 percentile P(Us): Percentage of members, which are above 95 percentile Heat Wave IHW=P(Ts) P(Ts): Percentage of members, which are above 95 percentile

TIGGE 38

PDF JRA-25/JCDAS PDF GSMaP JCDAS 39