調査資料 -253 国際 国内会議録の簡易分析に基づく 我が国の人工知能研究動向把握の試み 2016 年 8 月 文部科学省科学技術 学術政策研究所 科学技術予測センター 小柴等

Similar documents
ares_018


EPSON Safety Instructions Manual


6.indd

M-JUSD2471b

15690B_表紙1-4.pdf

ParkOptions&ACC_2001_Jap.ai

2: VPN Australia, Austria, Canada, China, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Italy, Kenya, Korea, Republic of, Malaysia, N

main.dvi

untitled

GDP TFP CRD

II a b b c d m a. 2 1

NX10_150223J16AB_0116.ai

Descartes Systems Group

Microsoft PowerPoint - SeminarNaft-I-Re.IntISMS&Standards-V

_314I01BM浅谷2.indd

GNH Gross National Happiness Criteria living standard cultural diversity emotional well being health education time use eco-system community vitality

-February GDP GDP

GDP 10 GDP Bureau of Economic Analysis 2

F4_LIFULL_A4_16P_pantone2018c

Company_2801.ai

untitled

JA

国際比較からみた介護システムの役割分担

Dynamics-NAV

<4D F736F F D C837C815B83678E C982C282A282C4816A2E646F63>

Digestive Endoscopy (DEN) の 国際化と発展 岩手医科大学内科学講座消化器内科消化管分野 松本主之 Digestive Endoscopy (EIC)

# _ qxd

<836D815B B E95E292D48AD BB A835E838D834F5F4D4B D8CB32E706466>

...Z _01.T.v (Page 1)

# _15683.qxd

食品、飲料、製薬、医療用途向けシーリングソリューション

& Groovy TM Shorty TM

スライド 1

IP Triple Play Copyright 2006, Allied Telesis Holdings, A rights reserved.

知能と情報, Vol.29, No.6, pp

1

PowerPoint プレゼンテーション

Microsoft Word - AY2017F MFR Application Guideline J

人工知能学会研究会資料 SIG-KBS-B Analysis of Voting Behavior in One Night Werewolf 1 2 Ema Nishizaki 1 Tomonobu Ozaki Graduate School of Integrated B

PowerPoint プレゼンテーション

MDGs Millennium Development Goals MDGsMDGs C

001

prd s _1253(2).pdf

Microsoft Word - 10 統計 参考.doc

Microsoft PowerPoint - DynamicsNAV_業務に合わせたシステムの構築 ppt

ドメイン名に関する各種統計資料

untitled

[ OASIS SAMPLE-EXTRACTION PRODUCTS ] LC-MS HPLC UPLC 1

Yubidenwa Apple Apple iphone ipod touch ipad itunes Apple Inc. 1

2. Twitter Twitter 2.1 Twitter Twitter( ) Twitter Twitter ( 1 ) RT ReTweet RT ReTweet RT ( 2 ) URL Twitter Twitter 140 URL URL URL 140 URL URL

(bitcoin) 2013 (1) (2) ( M ) (3) (Satoshi Nakamoto) (4) 20

サステナビリティ報告書

00 [更新済み]

% 95% 2002, 2004, Dunkel 1986, p.100 1

The 18th Game Programming Workshop ,a) 1,b) 1,c) 2,d) 1,e) 1,f) Adapting One-Player Mahjong Players to Four-Player Mahjong

環境報告書

スライド 1

- 1 -


PowerPoint Presentation

Vol. 48 No. 4 Apr LAN TCP/IP LAN TCP/IP 1 PC TCP/IP 1 PC User-mode Linux 12 Development of a System to Visualize Computer Network Behavior for L

The Value Of Interships - Adecco Asia White Paper 2015_no1


独立行政法人情報通信研究機構 Development of the Information Analysis System WISDOM KIDAWARA Yutaka NICT Knowledge Clustered Group researched and developed the infor

ディープラーニングとオープンサイエンス ~研究の爆速化が引き起こす摩擦なき情報流通へのシフト~

untitled

機関リポジトリ.PDF

2 24

A Comparative Study of the Project Evaluation on the Advancement of Athletes International Competitiveness: Focusing on the Circumstances

VAS xlsx

浜松医科大学紀要

RISO P ‘C’³

大学論集第42号本文.indb

& Vol.5 No (Oct. 2015) TV 1,2,a) , Augmented TV TV AR Augmented Reality 3DCG TV Estimation of TV Screen Position and Ro

_念3)医療2009_夏.indd

花井清人 25‐58/25‐58

IPSJ SIG Technical Report Vol.2014-EIP-63 No /2/21 1,a) Wi-Fi Probe Request MAC MAC Probe Request MAC A dynamic ads control based on tra

006.…G…l…‰…M†[(™|›º)P78†`

Studies of Foot Form for Footwear Design (Part 9) : Characteristics of the Foot Form of Young and Elder Women Based on their Sizes of Ball Joint Girth


16_.....E...._.I.v2006

johnny-paper2nd.dvi

[ GLYCAN ANALYSIS SLUTINS ] [ GLYCAN ANALYSIS SLUTINS ] N N 3 2

平成 30 年 1 月中対外 対内証券投資 ( 速報 ) Portfolio Investment Assets/Liabilities, January 2018 (Preliminary) ( 付表 3 / Appendix table 3) 対外 対内証券投資 Portfolio Invest


平成 29 年 7 月中対外 対内証券投資 ( 速報 ) Portfolio Investment Assets/Liabilities, July 2017 (Preliminary) ( 付表 3 / Appendix table 3) 対外 対内証券投資 Portfolio Investmen

Mining Social Network of Conference Participants from the Web

<95DB8C9288E397C389C88A E696E6462>

外国人旅行者の受入環境の整備に関する行政評価・監視_参考資料


目次 1. 冷え込みが続く日韓関係 グローバル化がもたらした変化 揺らぎ始めた日韓関係 岐路に立つ日韓関係 結びに代えて RIM 214 Vol.14 No.52

1 Fig. 1 Extraction of motion,.,,, 4,,, 3., 1, 2. 2.,. CHLAC,. 2.1,. (256 ).,., CHLAC. CHLAC, HLAC. 2.3 (HLAC ) r,.,. HLAC. N. 2 HLAC Fig. 2

Q [4] 2. [3] [5] ϵ- Q Q CO CO [4] Q Q [1] i = X ln n i + C (1) n i i n n i i i n i = n X i i C exploration exploitation [4] Q Q Q ϵ 1 ϵ 3. [3] [5] [4]

地域共同体を基盤とした渇水管理システムの持続可能性

...S.....\1_4.ai

工業意匠の国際登録制度:ハーグ条約

100 SDAM SDAM Windows2000/XP 4) SDAM TIN ESDA K G G GWR SDAM GUI

鹿大広報149号

Transcription:

調査資料 -253 国際 国内会議録の簡易分析に基づく 我が国の人工知能研究動向把握の試み 2016 年 8 月 文部科学省科学技術 学術政策研究所 科学技術予測センター 小柴等

調査研究体制 小柴等 科学技術予測センター研究員 Author Hitoshi KOSHIBA Ph.D., Research Fellow. Science and Technology Foresight Centre, National Institute of Science and Technology Policy (NISTEP), MEXT 本報告書の引用を行う際には 以下を参考に出典を明記願います Please specify reference as the following example when citing this NISTEP RESEARCH MATERIAL. 小柴等, 国際 国内会議録の簡易分析に基づく我が国の人工知能研究動向把握の試み,NISTEP RESEARCH MATERIAL,No.253, 文部科学省科学技術 学術政策研究所. DOI: http://doi.org/10.15108/rm253 Hitoshi KOSHIBA, Research Trends of AI based on International/National Conferences Proceedings, NISTEP RESEARCH MATERIAL, No.253, National Institute of Science and Technology Policy, Japan. DOI: http://doi.org/10.15108/rm253

国際 国内会議録の簡易分析に基づく我が国の人工知能研究動向把握の試み文部科学省科学技術 学術政策研究所科学技術予測センター小柴等要旨人工知能をはじめとする情報系の研究分野は 研究評価の重みの違いなどから計量書誌的分析で多く対象とされる原著論文をベースとした共引用関係分析だけでは動向を捕捉しづらい そこで 今後の動向分析に向けた検討用資料の作成を目的として 人工知能の著名な国際会議である AAAI AAMAS 及び KDD の 2010 年から 2015 年までの会議録をベースに 主要国別に発表数を数えることで 分野における我が国の存在感 ( 参画度 ) を簡易に見積もった また これらの会議の講演タイトルと 本分野における国内最大の学術会議である人工知能学会全国大会の 2010 年から 2015 年までの会議録に掲載された講演タイトルとを比較分析し 我が国と世界の研究動向の差異を簡易に見積もった 結果として 国内における人工知能研究は数としては増えてきているものの 著名な国際会議における発表件数には大きな変化はみられないこと 研究タイトルに含まれるキーワードに基づく簡易な分析のレベルでは 人工知能学会全国大会の発表タイトルによる我が国の人工知能研究の特徴として 環境 ロボット といつたキーワードが挙げられそうなこと が示唆された Research Trends of AI based on International/National Conferences Proceedings Hitoshi KOSHIBA, Science and Technology Foresight Centre, National Institute of Science and Technology Policy (NISTEP), MEXT ABSTRACT Some researches suggest that a research domain of ICT (i.e. computer science/engineering) including AI (Artificial Intelligence) had a different structure of the other domain at research impacts. That suggests these domain s important measurements should be done not only by journal paper but also by international conferences. By the way, today, anyone thinks that AI has a power of changing society. However, we generally do not know the status of ICT/AI research domains based on international conferences. Especially we do not grasp Japan s position. In this paper, we report a result of a trial to reveal the status of AI research domains based on international conferences. In this research, we pick up three major international conferences and one domestic conference at Japan. In addition, we try two types of methods for our purpose. At first, we count a country of author affiliation. Second, we collect report titles and pick up the terms in them, and count those. Our results are as follows; In Japan, AI researches have increased. In addition, those international conference papers have increased, too. However, international conference papers from Japan are being flatted out. In Japan, AI research s characteristic words are Environment and Robot.

1 1 2 1 3 2 3.1...................................... 3 3.2........................................ 3 4 4 4.1......................................... 4 4.2........................................ 12 5 14 6 14 A IJCAI 17 B ICML 19 C NIPS 20

1 [2] IEEE World-Wide Web Conference [3, 4, 2] 2 AAAI ( Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence ) AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence AAAI IFAAMAS ( International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent System ) The AAMAS conference AAMAS ACM ( Association for Computing Machinery ) SIGKDD ( Special Interest Group on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining ) ACM SIGKDD Conferences on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining KDD IJCAI ( International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence ), NIPS ( Neural Information Processing Systems ), ICML ( International Conference on Machine Learning ) AAAI AAMAS, KDD 3 AAAI IJCAI AAMAS NIPS, ICML, KDD 2.1 Web AAAI, AAMAS, KDD 1 1 IJCAI, NIPS, ICML 1

2.1 URL AAAI http://www.aaai.org/conferences/ AAMAS http://www.aamas-conference.org/ KDD http://www.kdd.org/conferences IJCAI http://www.ijcai.org/past_conferences NIPS https://nips.cc/ ICML http://www.machinelearning.org/icml.html 2010 2015 AAAI 2010 ( JSAI : Japan Society of Artificial Intelligence ) JSAI AAAI, AAMAS, KDD 2010 2015 3 1. 2. Web ( Proceedings ) Web AAAI 3 AAMAS 1 AAAI, AAMAS, KDD 2

3.1 (Japan) (Korea) (China) (USA) 3 (UK) (France) (Germany) (Italy) (Canada) (Spain) (Australia) (India) 8 12 2 2010 2015 5 A A B B C A B C A B A C B C 3 3.2 2 USA,UK United States, United Kingdom JAPAN japan 3

4.1 AAAI 300 AAAI 600 国別発表数 200 100 400 200 総発表数 0 凡例例 : 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 開催年 総数 Japan China Korea USA 0 4.2 AAAI Total Japan Korea China USA UK France Germany Italy Canada Spain Australia India 2010 348 8(2.3%) 4(1.1%) 42(12.1%) 192(55.2%) 19(5.5%) 11(3.2%) 21(6.0%) 9(2.6%) 24(6.9%) 7(2.0%) 20(5.7%) 6(1.7%) 2011 344 9(2.6%) 4(1.2%) 45(13.1%) 195(56.7%) 18(5.2%) 7(2.0%) 24(7.0%) 7(2.0%) 26(7.6%) 2(0.6%) 23(6.7%) 3(0.9%) 2012 383 11(2.9%) 2(0.5%) 50(13.1%) 189(49.3%) 24(6.3%) 20(5.2%) 19(5.0%) 12(3.1%) 29(7.6%) 5(1.3%) 35(9.1%) 7(1.8%) 2013 277 10(3.6%) 2(0.7%) 44(15.9%) 156(56.3%) 11(4.0%) 7(2.5%) 19(6.9%) 11(4.0%) 14(5.1%) 2(0.7%) 14(5.1%) 2(0.7%) 2014 474 17(3.6%) 4(0.8%) 104(21.9%) 223(47.0%) 24(5.1%) 20(4.2%) 22(4.6%) 8(1.7%) 37(7.8%) 7(1.5%) 31(6.5%) 6(1.3%) 2015 674 20(3.0%) 10(1.5%) 138(20.5%) 326(48.4%) 55(8.2%) 24(3.6%) 26(3.9%) 19(2.8%) 37(5.5%) 4(0.6%) 59(8.8%) 15(2.2%) * United States ** United Kingdom AAAI AAAI2010 AAAI2011 TF/IDF TF/IDF 4 4.1 AAAI 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4, 4.5 4.1,4.2 AAAI 2013 3 2 3% 4.4 4

Luxembourg Kenya Tunisia Argentina Iran Turkey Serbia and Montenegro Romania Thailand Morocco Iceland Russia UAE Slovenia Saudi Arabia Hungary Norway Uganda Venezuela Taiwan New Zealand Puerto Rico Finland 4.3 AAAI Japan Korea China USA UK France 2010 2 6 8 3 1 4 17 24 41 36 156 192 11 8 19 8 3 11 2011 2 7 9 1 3 4 24 19 43 41 154 195 9 9 18 6 1 7 2012 3 8 11 0 2 2 28 22 50 52 137 189 18 6 24 11 9 20 2013 4 6 10 1 1 2 21 23 44 42 114 156 8 3 11 4 3 7 2014 7 10 17 3 1 4 40 61 101 67 156 223 18 6 24 10 10 20 2015 9 11 20 4 6 10 66 68 134 87 239 326 38 17 55 13 11 24 27 48 75 12 14 26 196 217 413 325 956 1281 102 49 151 52 37 89 Germany Italy Canada Spain Australia India 2010 12 9 21 6 3 9 8 16 24 1 6 7 14 6 20 4 2 6 2011 7 17 24 3 4 7 13 13 26 2 0 2 12 11 23 1 2 3 2012 11 8 19 5 7 12 14 15 29 4 1 5 15 20 35 5 2 7 2013 15 4 19 7 4 11 6 8 14 2 0 2 7 7 14 1 1 2 2014 16 6 22 5 3 8 13 24 37 5 2 7 24 7 31 6 0 6 2015 16 10 26 13 6 19 20 17 37 0 4 4 34 25 59 8 7 15 77 54 131 39 27 66 74 93 167 14 13 27 106 76 182 25 14 39 4.4 AAAI 2010 2015 India UK USA Israel Netherlands Chile Greece Australia China Austria Singapore Japan Korea Hong Kong France Brazil Canada Sweden Poland Czech Switzerland Italy Portugal Spain Germany Belgium Denmark Ireland 5

4.5 AAAI 2010 2015 6

4.6 125 100 AAMAS AAMAS 300 国別発表数 75 50 200 総発表数 25 100 0 0 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 開催年 凡例例 : 総数 Japan China Korea USA 4.7 AAMAS Total Japan Korea China USA UK France Germany Italy Canada Spain Australia India 2010 318 11(3.5%) 0(0.0%) 4(1.3%) 104(32.7%) 49(15.4%) 14(4.4%) 17(5.3%) 14(4.4%) 18(5.7%) 25(7.9%) 15(4.7%) 2(0.6%) 2011 276 12(4.3%) 0(0.0%) 3(1.1%) 83(30.1%) 30(10.9%) 12(4.3%) 19(6.9%) 13(4.7%) 11(4.0%) 24(8.7%) 9(3.3%) 1(0.4%) 2012 310 7(2.3%) 0(0.0%) 4(1.3%) 88(28.4%) 40(12.9%) 15(4.8%) 12(3.9%) 19(6.1%) 7(2.3%) 22(7.1%) 12(3.9%) 3(1.0%) 2013 321 7(2.2%) 0(0.0%) 9(2.8%) 123(38.3%) 53(16.5%) 19(5.9%) 10(3.1%) 18(5.6%) 12(3.7%) 7(2.2%) 17(5.3%) 6(1.9%) 2014 378 17(4.5%) 2(0.5%) 13(3.4%) 119(31.5%) 68(18.0%) 32(8.5%) 25(6.6%) 19(5.0%) 16(4.2%) 10(2.6%) 21(5.6%) 6(1.6%) 2015 363 5(1.4%) 0(0.0%) 18(5.0%) 121(33.3%) 60(16.5%) 30(8.3%) 22(6.1%) 26(7.2%) 12(3.3%) 11(3.0%) 21(5.8%) 19(5.2%) 4.8 AAAI Japan Korea China USA UK France 2010 5 6 11 0 0 0 2 2 4 28 76 104 20 29 49 7 7 14 2011 2 10 12 0 0 0 2 1 3 26 57 83 15 15 30 6 6 12 2012 3 4 7 0 0 0 1 3 4 25 63 88 20 20 40 10 5 15 2013 1 6 7 0 0 0 7 2 9 29 94 123 30 23 53 8 11 19 2014 7 10 17 1 1 2 3 10 13 41 78 119 40 28 68 13 19 32 2015 3 2 5 0 0 0 11 7 18 40 81 121 29 31 60 11 19 30 21 38 59 1 1 2 26 25 51 189 449 638 154 146 300 55 67 122 Germany Italy Canada Spain Australia India 2010 7 10 17 5 9 14 4 14 18 6 19 25 8 7 15 2 0 2 2011 9 10 19 7 6 13 2 9 11 6 18 24 4 5 9 0 1 1 2012 6 6 12 13 6 19 1 6 7 10 12 22 1 11 12 0 3 3 2013 6 4 10 8 10 18 7 5 12 5 2 7 5 12 17 2 4 6 2014 13 12 25 12 7 19 5 11 16 7 3 10 8 13 21 4 2 6 2015 9 13 22 14 12 26 5 7 12 6 5 11 13 8 21 7 12 19 50 55 105 59 50 109 24 52 76 40 59 99 39 56 95 15 22 37 AAMAS 4.6, 4.7, 4.8, 4.9, 4.10 AAMAS 2013 AAMAS 2011 7

Chile South Africa Argentina Cyprus Iran Cuba Armenia Turkey Romania Egypt Thailand Malaysia Iceland Russia Slovenia Korea Croatia Norway Vietnam Ireland Lebanon Mexico Hong Kong Austria 4.9 AAMAS 2010 2015 India UK USA Israel Netherlands Greece Australia China Singapore Japan UAE France Luxembourg Brazil Canada Sweden Poland Czech New Zealand Switzerland Italy Portugal Spain Germany Belgium Denmark 4.10 AAMAS 2010 2015 5 2010 4.9 8

4.11 KDD KDD 250 150 200 国別発表数 100 50 150 100 50 総発表数 0 凡例例 : 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 開催年 総数 Japan China Korea USA 0 4.12 KDD Total Japan Korea China USA UK France Germany Italy Canada Spain Australia India 2010 136 5(3.7%) 0(0.0%) 23(16.9%) 84(61.8%) 2(1.5%) 1(0.7%) 5(3.7%) 1(0.7%) 1(0.7%) 2(1.5%) 6(4.4%) 3(2.2%) 2011 177 2(1.1%) 1(0.6%) 18(10.2%) 134(75.7%) 4(2.3%) 3(1.7%) 7(4.0%) 5(2.8%) 5(2.8%) 2(1.1%) 1(0.6%) 7(4.0%) 2012 209 8(3.8%) 2(1.0%) 44(21.1%) 132(63.2%) 3(1.4%) 3(1.4%) 9(4.3%) 3(1.4%) 5(2.4%) 4(1.9%) 7(3.3%) 6(2.9%) 2013 197 6(3.0%) 1(0.5%) 28(14.2%) 140(71.1%) 7(3.6%) 5(2.5%) 5(2.5%) 3(1.5%) 6(3.0%) 7(3.6%) 7(3.6%) 4(2.0%) 2014 218 5(2.3%) 0(0.0%) 32(14.7%) 162(74.3%) 7(3.2%) 4(1.8%) 9(4.1%) 5(2.3%) 8(3.7%) 3(1.4%) 7(3.2%) 8(3.7%) 2015 252 15(6.0%) 6(2.4%) 30(11.9%) 190(75.4%) 5(2.0%) 7(2.8%) 8(3.2%) 4(1.6%) 4(1.6%) 5(2.0%) 11(4.4%) 8(3.2%) 4.13 KDD Japan Korea China USA UK France 2010 2 3 5 0 0 0 14 9 23 20 64 84 1 1 2 1 0 1 2011 1 1 2 0 1 1 14 4 18 31 103 134 0 4 4 2 1 3 2012 3 5 8 0 2 2 19 25 44 34 98 132 1 2 3 3 0 3 2013 3 3 6 0 1 1 21 7 28 39 101 140 6 1 7 3 2 5 2014 1 4 5 0 0 0 24 8 32 50 112 162 5 2 7 2 2 4 2015 5 10 15 5 1 6 18 12 30 54 136 190 3 2 5 7 0 7 15 26 41 5 5 10 110 65 175 228 614 842 16 12 28 18 5 23 Germany Italy Canada Spain Australia India 2010 3 2 5 0 1 1 0 1 1 2 0 2 3 3 6 2 1 3 2011 6 1 7 3 2 5 4 1 5 2 0 2 1 0 1 4 3 7 2012 4 5 9 3 0 3 3 2 5 3 1 4 3 4 7 4 2 6 2013 3 2 5 3 0 3 2 4 6 7 0 7 3 4 7 2 2 4 2014 4 5 9 4 1 5 5 3 8 2 1 3 2 5 7 3 5 8 2015 7 1 8 3 1 4 4 0 4 5 0 5 9 2 11 6 2 8 27 16 43 16 5 21 18 11 29 21 2 23 21 18 39 21 15 36 KDD 4.11, 4.12, 4.13, 4.14, 4.15 KDD 2010 AAAI, AAMAS AAAI, AAMAS KDD AAMAS 9

Netherlands Poland Belgium Brazil Portugal Argentina Denmark Bangladesh St. Vincent Qatar Slovenia India Israel Slovakia Saudi Arabia Korea Norway Uganda Philippines Ireland Singapore Sweden New Zealand 4.14 KDD 2010 2015 UK USA Greece Australia China Japan Hong Kong Taiwan France Canada Finland Switzerland Italy Spain Germany 4.15 KDD 2010 2015 4.14 10

4.16 AAAI, AAMAS, KDD, JSAI 800 600 発表件数記事数 400 200 0 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 開催年 凡例例 : AAAI AAMAS JSAI KDD 4.17 AAAI, AAMAS, KDD, JSAI AAAI AAMAS KDD JSAI 2010 348 318 136 415 2011 344 276 177 428 2012 383 310 209 567 2013 277 321 197 737 2014 474 378 218 681 2015 674 363 252 723 AAAI, AAMAS, KDD JSAI 4.16,4.17 JSAI AAAI, AAMAS, KDD AAMAS 2011 JSAI 2011 2013 AAAI 2010 400 2013 700 2016 6 6 9 JSAI2016 700 11

4.18 AAAI 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 1 learning 0.026 learning 0.025 learning 0.018 learning 0.021 learning 0.022 learning 0.023 2 planning 0.010 planning 0.013 planning 0.009 planning 0.007 planning 0.007 model 0.008 3 search 0.009 search 0.008 games 0.008 search 0.007 social 0.007 data 0.008 4 model 0.008 approach 0.007 approach 0.007 approach 0.006 model 0.007 planning 0.008 5 social 0.007 games 0.006 search 0.007 games 0.006 online 0.007 approach 0.006 6 approach 0.007 networks 0.006 models 0.006 data 0.005 search 0.007 models 0.005 7 models 0.005 social 0.005 systems 0.005 knowledge 0.005 models 0.005 social 0.005 8 games 0.005 programming 0.005 social 0.005 clustering 0.005 networks 0.005 prediction 0.005 9 reinforcement 0.005 model 0.005 data 0.005 model 0.005 data 0.005 networks 0.005 10 data 0.005 semantic 0.005 dynamic 0.004 programming 0.005 image 0.005 representation 0.004 11 networks 0.004 analysis 0.004 optimal 0.004 multiagent 0.005 probabilistic 0.005 bayesian 0.004 12 multi-agent 0.004 probabilistic 0.004 model 0.004 online 0.005 analysis 0.005 online 0.004 13 programming 0.004 optimal 0.004 analysis 0.004 classification 0.005 classification 0.004 probabilistic 0.004 14 language 0.004 information 0.004 efficient 0.004 recognition 0.004 sparse 0.004 modeling 0.004 15 information 0.004 models 0.004 logic 0.004 social 0.004 multiple 0.004 knowledge 0.004 TF/IDF 4.19 AMAS 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 1 multi-agent 0.015 games 0.018 (demonstration) 0.017 learning 0.015 agents 0.016 learning 0.011 2 agents 0.014 agents 0.011 games 0.014 agent 0.014 systems 0.011 multi-agent 0.011 3 agent 0.012 systems 0.011 learning 0.013 agents 0.012 social 0.011 social 0.011 4 learning 0.011 multiagent 0.010 agents 0.013 systems 0.012 games 0.011 model 0.010 5 games 0.010 multi-agent 0.009 multi-agent 0.011 multi-agent 0.010 learning 0.010 systems 0.009 6 distributed 0.010 agent 0.009 multiagent 0.010 multiagent 0.009 multi-agent 0.010 agents 0.009 7 systems 0.009 reasoning 0.008 approach 0.008 games 0.009 agent 0.007 multiagent 0.008 8 multiagent 0.009 social 0.008 systems 0.007 virtual 0.009 model 0.007 games 0.007 9 framework 0.007 model 0.007 agent 0.007 planning 0.008 multiagent 0.005 agent 0.007 10 approach 0.007 learning 0.007 social 0.006 social 0.008 approach 0.005 planning 0.007 11 virtual 0.007 agent-based 0.006 virtual 0.006 approach 0.008 agent-based 0.005 agent-based 0.006 12 model 0.007 game 0.006 formation 0.006 information 0.007 distributed 0.005 consortium) 0.006 13 coordination 0.006 planning 0.006 modeling 0.006 model 0.007 reinforcement 0.005 (doctoral 0.006 14 planning 0.006 human 0.005 rules 0.005 coordination 0.005 networks 0.005 design 0.005 15 search 0.006 distributed 0.005 behavior 0.005 control 0.005 game 0.005 human 0.005 TF/IDF 4.2 AAAI, AAMAS, KDD, JSAI 4.18, 4.19, 4.20, 4.21 [ a, an, and, at, based, by, for, from, in, of, on, the, to, using, via, with. ] MeCab[5] mecab-ipadic- NEologd[6] mecab-ipadic-neologd 12

4.20 KDD 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 1 mining 0.030 data 0.027 mining 0.022 data 0.022 learning 0.019 data 0.020 2 data 0.030 mining 0.018 data 0.020 social 0.020 data 0.019 learning 0.019 3 learning 0.024 learning 0.015 social 0.016 learning 0.017 social 0.015 networks 0.014 4 networks 0.014 networks 0.010 learning 0.015 mining 0.016 mining 0.011 social 0.011 5 models 0.013 social 0.010 networks 0.013 networks 0.011 networks 0.009 prediction 0.009 6 social 0.013 classification 0.009 information 0.009 online 0.010 large 0.009 clustering 0.009 7 information 0.009 streams 0.008 clustering 0.008 search 0.010 modeling 0.008 modeling 0.008 8 clustering 0.008 models 0.008 online 0.007 prediction 0.007 network 0.008 online 0.008 9 graph 0.007 graph 0.008 analysis 0.007 models 0.007 detection 0.007 framework 0.007 10 feature 0.007 clustering 0.008 efficient 0.007 analysis 0.007 clustering 0.006 machine 0.007 11 classification 0.007 topic 0.008 graphs 0.007 information 0.007 sparse 0.006 mining 0.007 12 online 0.007 analysis 0.007 system 0.007 large 0.007 scalable 0.006 deep 0.006 13 class 0.007 system 0.007 web 0.006 system 0.007 online 0.006 large 0.006 14 algorithm 0.006 information 0.007 discovery 0.006 scalable 0.006 management 0.005 big 0.006 15 model 0.006 network 0.007 search 0.006 classification 0.006 graphs 0.005 models 0.005 TF/IDF 4.21 JSAI 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 1 0.033 0.022 0.027 0.026 0.027 0.024 2 0.021 0.020 0.019 0.018 0.020 0.021 3 0.018 0.018 0.017 0.013 0.017 0.020 4 0.015 0.015 0.013 0.013 0.017 0.016 5 0.013 0.014 0.011 0.008 0.016 0.016 6 0.012 0.014 0.011 0.008 0.012 0.010 7 0.011 0.012 0.008 0.007 0.008 0.009 8 0.010 0.012 0.008 0.007 0.008 0.008 9 0.010 0.009 0.008 0.006 0.008 0.007 10 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.006 0.007 0.006 11 0.008 0.007 0.008 0.006 0.007 0.006 12 0.008 0.007 0.007 0.006 0.006 0.006 13 0.006 0.007 0.007 0.006 0.006 0.005 14 0.006 Web 0.007 0.007 0.005 0.005 0.005 15 0.006 0.005 0.007 0.005 0.005 0.005 TF/IDF Artificial Intelligence Artificial Intelligence Deep Learning Deep Learning 4.18 AAAI 2011 2014 2015 probabilistic 2015 bayesian probabilistic 13

social 2010 2013 2014 AAAI AAMAS, KDD JSAI 5 Web AAAI AAMAS, KDD JSAI 6 AAAI, AAMAS, KDD (JSAI) 14

[2] 15

[1]. 5. http://www8.cao.go. jp/cstp/kihonkeikaku/index5.html 28 1 22. [2],,,,,. World-Wide Web Conference. DISCUSSION PAPER No.110, http://hdl.handle.net/11035/3014 2014 11. [3],,,. IEEE. No.194, http://hdl.handle.net/11035/876 2011 06. [4],,.. No.199, http://hdl.handle.net/11035/932 2011 08. [5] Kudo Takumi. MeCab : Yet Another Part-of-Speech and Morphological Analyzer. http: //mecab.sourceforge.net/ 2005. [6] Sato Toshinori. Neologism dictionary based on the language resources on the Web for Mecab. https://github.com/neologd/mecab-ipadic-neologd 2015. 16

A IJCAI IJCAI AAAI AAAI AAAI IJCAI AAAI IJCAI AAAI 5 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 PDF 3.2 1 PDF PDF A.1 A.1.com.edu A.2 IJCAI AAAI AAMAS, KDD 2013 2015 A.1.jp. JP.kr. KR.cn. CN.edu. EDU.uk. UK.fr. FR.de. DE.it. IT.ca. CA.es. ES.au. AU.in. IN 17

A.2 IJCAI Total Japan Korea China USA UK France Germany Italy Canada Spain Australia India 2007 471 18(3.8%) 2(0.4%) 14(3.0.%) 153(32.5%) 34(7.2%) 36(7.6%) 23(4.9%) 28(5.9%) 24(5.1%) 9(1.9%) 23(4.9%) 15(3.2%) 2009 334 12(3.6%) 1(0.3%) 21(6.3%) 118(35.3%) 17(5.1%) 22(6.6%) 21(6.3%) 15(4.5%) 24(7.2%) 3(0.9%) 18(5.4%) 2(0.6%) 2011 482 20(4.1%) 2(0.4%) 37(7.7%) 132(27.4%) 34(7.1%) 30(6.2%) 33(6.8%) 29(6.0%) 26(5.4%) 22(4.6%) 20(4.1%) 2(0.4%) 2013 489 8(1.6%) 3(0.6%) 76(15.5%) 109(22.3%) 36(7.4%) 35(7.2%) 18(3.7%) 17(3.5%) 24(4.9%) 9(1.8%) 31(6.3%) 2(0.4%) 2015 648 9(1.4%) 1(0.2%) 116(17.9%) 150(23.1%) 52(8.0%) 36(5.6%) 33(5.1%) 29(4.5%) 16(2.5%) 8(1.2%) 32(4.9%) 6(0.9%) * 18

B ICML A ICML A PDF 1 ICML AAAI AAMAS, KDD 2010 2015 6 PDF A.1 A.1.com.edu ICML B.1 AAAI AAMAS, KDD ICML 2014 2015 2013 2014 12 B.1 ICML Total Japan Korea China USA UK France Germany Italy Canada Spain Australia India 2010 159 4(2.5%) 0(0.0%) 3(1.9%) 71(44.7%) 3(1.9%) 10(6.3%) 12(7.5%) 2(1.3%) 4(2.5%) 1(0.6%) 2(1.3%) 1(0.6%) 2011 160 5(3.1%) 0(0.0%) 3(1.9%) 55(34.4%) 5(3.1%) 12(7.5%) 9(5.6%) 1(0.6%) 8(5.0%) 5(3.1%) 3(1.9%) 0(0.0%) 2012 243 7(2.9%) 1(0.4%) 6(2.5%) 90(37.0%) 13(5.3%) 15(6.2%) 14(5.8%) 2(0.8%) 11(4.5%) 0(0.0%) 4(1.6%) 0(0.0%) 2013 283 3(1.1%) 0(0.0%) 12(4.2%) 108(38.2%) 16(5.7%) 14(4.9%) 9(3.2%) 1(0.4%) 18(6.4%) 1(0.4%) 9(3.2%) 4(1.4%) 2014 310 12(3.9%) 1(0.3%) 15(4.8%) 113(36.5%) 8(2.6%) 9(2.9%) 10(3.2%) 4(1.3%) 20(6.5%) 1(0.3%) 4(1.3%) 3(1.0%) 2015 270 3(1.1%) 4(1.5%) 11(4.1%) 99(36.7%) 14(5.2%) 15(5.6%) 9(3.3%) 1(0.4%) 18(6.7%) 2(0.7%) 7(2.6%) 6(2.2%) * 19

C NIPS A B NIPS PDF NIPS AAAI AAMAS, KDD 2010 2015 6 PDF A.1 A.1.com.edu C.1 AAAI AAMAS, KDD ICML A A.2 C.1 NIPS Total Japan Korea China USA UK France Germany Italy Canada Spain Australia India 2010 292 6(2.1%) 1(0.3%) 7(2.4%) 165(56.5%) 11(3.8%) 18(6.2%) 16(5.5%) 6(2.1%) 14(4.8%) 1(0.3%) 5(1.7%) 3(1.0%) 2011 306 13(4.2%) 3(1.0%) 2(0.7%) 161(52.6%) 25(8.2%) 17(5.6%) 27(8.8%) 4(1.3%) 14(4.6%) 2(0.7%) 4(1.3%) 1(0.3%) 2012 368 11(3.0%) 4(1.1%) 15(4.1%) 189(51.4%) 30(8.2%) 21(5.7%) 20(5.4%) 3(0.8%) 19(5.2%) 3(0.8%) 5(1.4%) 3(0.8%) 2013 360 7(1.9%) 1(0.3%) 8(2.2%) 198(55.0%) 29(8.1%) 18(5.0%) 23(6.4%) 5(1.4%) 15(4.2%) 3(0.8%) 7(1.9%) 3(0.8%) 2014 411 5(1.2%) 2(0.5%) 13(3.2%) 232(56.4%) 31(7.5%) 26(6.3%) 17(4.1%) 2(0.5%) 17(4.1%) 4(1.0%) 10(2.4%) 11(2.7%) 2015 403 8(2.0%) 5(1.2%) 10(2.5%) 216(53.6%) 23(5.7%) 21(5.2%) 15(3.7%) 3(0.7%) 13(3.2%) 0(0.0%) 10(2.5%) 7(1.7%) * 20

調査資料 -253 国際 国内会議録の簡易分析に基づく我が国の人工知能研究動向把握の試み 2016 年 8 月 文部科学省科学技術 学術政策研究所科学技術予測センター小柴等 100-0013 東京都千代田区霞が関 3-2-2 中央合同庁舎第 7 号館東館 16 階 TEL: 03-3581-0605 FAX: 03-3503-3996 Research Trends of AI based on International/National Conferences Proceedings August 2016 Hitoshi KOSHIBA Science and Technology Foresight Centre National Institute of Science and Technology Policy (NISTEP) Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), Japan http://doi.org/10.15108/rm253

http://www.nistep.go.jp