Nara Women's University Digital I Title 歴 史 学 の 危 機 と アナール : 21 世 紀 の 社 会 史 に 向 けて Author(s) 渡 辺, 和 行 Citation 奈 良 女 子 大 学 文 学 部 研 究 教 育 年 報, 第 3 号, pp.49-62 Issue Date 2007-03-31 Description URL http://hdl.handle.net/10935/704 Textversionpublisher This document is downloaded http://nwudir.lib.nara-w.ac.jp/dspace
Crises of History and School of Annales WATANABE Kazuyuki School of Annales has contributed to deepen the historical studies and to spread the territories of historians since 1929. Historical studies have developped from a geographical history or a structural history Chistoire totale) to an anthropological history Chistoire des mentalites). The age of Annales are divided into four periods. The first is an time of founders, Lucien Febvre and Marc Bloch from 1929 to 1956. Fernand Braudel who had succeeded the direction of review "Annales" from Febvre leaded in the second period 0956-1969). Jacque Le Goff and Emmanuel Le Roy Ladurie in succession of Braudel had conducted Annales from 1969 to 1989. Since 1989, the fourth generation of Annales, that is to say, Jacques Revel, Andre Burguiere, Roger Chartier, and Bernard Lepetit have been protagonists of social history. However in the 1980s, the historical studies have just confronted two difficulties which we call it "crises of history". One is a segmentation of historical researches and the other is a epistemological challenges of post-modernism, that is to say, linguistic turn. How does the forth generation of Annales think of crises of history? These are my probelmatiques that are needed to resolve.