untitled
|
|
|
- のぶみつ しばもと
- 7 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 GITA-JAPAN How to Use GIS Effectively for Disaster Response Lessons Learned from the 2004 Niigataken-Chuetsu Earthquake
2
3
4 Disaster Management Cycle Disaster Impact Risk Transference() Risk Acceptance Preparedness Risk Avoidance Risk Reduction Mitigation Response Recovery
5
6
7 GIS
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20 GIS GIS ALL Japan 3. GIS
21
22
23
24
25
26
27 - - vs vs 10,196
28 DATS Damage Assessment Total Support system IPS Inspection Process Support PTS Personnel Training Support DMS Data Management Support
29
30 DATS 10/28 11/15 11/21-16,668 2,957
31 PTS:
32
33 PTS:
34 /20 1m 5cm 1/60 1/20 1m 1.5 5cm 40
35 PTS:
36 =
37 [ ] Damage Assessment Training System (DATS)
38 IPS Inspection Process Support
39 ArcPad ArcPad PDA/GPS10
40
41
42
43
44
45 DMS Data Management Support
46
47 GIS ArcGIS ArcGIS13PCGIS ArcSDE ArcSDE OracleIBM
48 GIS
49
50 被災度判定調査結果の表示 写真ボタンを押すと調査時に撮っ た写真及び紙の調査票 細かいコ メントなどが書かれている が表示 されるので 申請者とともに評価 内容について話し合える
51 2 GIS
52
53
54
55 OMS: Operation Management Support
56 Front Stage Back Stage
57
58
59
60 or
61
62
63 GIS
64
65
66 TOC
67
68 3
69
70
「諸雑公文書」整理の中間報告
30 10 3 from to 10 from to ( ) ( ) 20 20 20 20 20 35 8 39 11 41 10 41 9 41 7 43 13 41 11 42 7 42 11 41 7 42 10 4 4 8 4 30 10 ( ) ( ) 17 23 5 11 5 8 8 11 11 13 14 15 16 17 121 767 1,225 2.9 18.7 29.8 3.9
災害表1.eps
Assessment of Disaster Damages in 2008 Assessment of Disaster Damages in 2008 Assessment of Disaster Damages in 2008 Assessment of Disaster Damages in 2008 Assessment of Disaster Damages in 2008 Assessment
DISASTER MANAGEMENT IN JAPAN CONTENTS 1 2 The Nation and Its Disasters A Disaster-prone Country 1 The General Disaster Situation 2 4 7 Progress in Dis
DISASTER MANAGEMENT IN JAPAN CABINET OFFICE GOVERNMENT OF JAPAN DISASTER MANAGEMENT IN JAPAN CONTENTS 1 2 The Nation and Its Disasters A Disaster-prone Country 1 The General Disaster Situation 2 4 7 Progress
untitled
1 211022 2 11150 211022384 3 1000 23% 77% 10% 10% 5% 20% 15% 40% 5% 3% 8% 16% 15% 42% 5% 6% 4 =1000 = 66 5 =1000 = 59 6 52%(42% 1000 7 56% 41% 40% 97% 3% 11%, 2% 3%, 41 7% 49% 30%, 18%, 40%, 83% =1000
JA2008
A1 1 10 vs 3 2 1 3 2 0 3 2 10 2 0 0 2 1 0 3 A2 3 11 vs 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 3 6 0 1 4 x 11 A3 5 4 vs 5 6 5 1 0 0 3 0 4 6 0 0 1 0 4 5 A4 7 11 vs 2 8 8 2 0 0 0 0 2 7 2 7 0 2 x 11 A5 9 5 vs 3 10 9 4 0 1 0 0 5
SUMMARY This paper evaluates the livelihood recovery programs in the affected area of the Great East Japan Earthquake disasters, conducted by NPO/NGOs, private companies and governments. This was the first
2 1 図 2 連邦政府と地方との役割分担 ( 出典 :FEMA) 2 2. 米国の危機管理システムの変遷 1950 Disaster Relief Act Civil Defense Act National Flood Insurance Act
特集 : 大規模災害と社会保障 Ⅱ 災害発生時における危機対応システム - 米国の事例に学ぶ - 牧紀男 要約本稿は 被害軽減 (preparedness) を中心とした危機対応から 被害抑止 (mitigation) 災害復興 (recovery) までも含めた総合的な防災対策を構築していっている米国の事例から 東日本大震災の教訓を踏まえた新たな日本の危機管理対策のあり方について考えるものである
2005 3 GIS GIS GIS Wiki GIS 2. 福 岡 県 西 方 沖 地 震 と GIS プロジェクトの 概 要 2005 3 20 10 53 9km M 7.0 6 1 5 4 20 M 5.8 1890 4 6 1 50 875 4000 550 47 3380 GIS 13
GIS Theory and Applications of GIS, 2009, Vol. 17, No.1, pp.93-99 WikiおよびGIS 技 術 による 持 続 可 能 な 災 害 情 報 の 共 有 化 手 法 の 検 討 池 見 洋 明 江 崎 哲 郎 三 谷 泰 浩 Sustainable Data-sharing for Disasters Based on the Wiki
180 30 30 180 180 181 (3)(4) (3)(4)(2) 60 180 (1) (2) 20 (3)
12 12 72 (1) (2) (3) 12 (1) (2) (3) (1) (2) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (1) (2) 180 30 30 180 180 181 (3)(4) (3)(4)(2) 60 180 (1) (2) 20 (3) 30 16 (1) 31 (2) 31 (3) (1) (2) (3) (4) 30
untitled
1....1 2....2 2.1...2 2.2...2 3....14 3.1...14 3.2...14 4....15 4.1...15 4.2...18 4.3...21 4.4...23 4.5...26 5....27 5.1...27 5.2...35 5.3...54 5.4...64 5.5...75 6....79 6.1...79 6.2...85 6.3...94 6.4...
113 120cm 1120cm 3 10cm 900 500+240 10 1 2 3 5 4 5 3 8 6 3 8 6 7 6 8 4 4 4 4 23 23 5 5 7
untitled
21 14 487 2,322 2 7 48 4 15 ( 27) 14 3(1867) 3 () 1 2 3 ( 901923 ) 5 (1536) 3 4 5 6 7 8 ( ) () () 9 10 21 11 12 13 14 16 17 18 20 1 19 20 21 22 23 21 22 24 25 26 27 28 22 5 29 30cm 7.5m 1865 3 1820 5
1948 1907 4024 1925 14 19281929 30 111931 4 3 15 4 16 3 15 4 161933 813 1935 12 17 11 17 1938 1945 2010 14 221 1945 10 1946 11 1947 1048 1947 1949 24
15 4 16 1988 63 28 19314 29 3 15 4 16 19283 15294 16 1930 113132 3 15 4 16 33 13 35 12 3 15 4 16 1945 10 10 10 10 40 1948 1907 4024 1925 14 19281929 30 111931 4 3 15 4 16 3 15 4 161933 813 1935 12 17 11
裁定審議会における裁定の概要 (平成23年度)
23 23 23 4 24 3 10 11 12 13 14 () 1 23 7 21 23 12 14 (19 ) 30 1.876% 60 8 24 19 78 27 1 (10) 37 (3) 2 22 9 21 23 5 9 21 12 1 22 2 27 89 10 11 6 A B 3 21 12 1 12 10 10 12 5 1 9 1 2 61 ( 21 10 1 11 30 )
<91E6825289F1938C966B95FA8ECB90FC88E397C38B5A8F708A778F7091E589EF8EC08D7388CF88F5837D836A83858341838B566572312E696E6464>
Microsoft Word - 入居のしおり.doc
1 1 2 2 2 3 2 4 3 5 3 6 3 7 3 8 4 1 7 2 7 3 7 4 8 5 9 6 9 7 10 8 10 9 11 10 11 11 11 12 12 13 13 1 14 2 17 3 18 4 19 5 20 6 22 (1) 24 (2) 24 (3) 24 (4) 24 (5) 24 (6) 25 (7) 25 (8) 25 (9) 25 1 29 (1) 29
和県監査H15港湾.PDF
...1...1...1...1...1...1...1...1...2...2...2...3...3...3...5...5...10...11...12...13...13...13...14...14...14...14...14...14...15...15...15...15...15 ...16...17 14...17...18...18...19...21...23 2...25...27...27...28...28...28
( )
( ) () () 3 cm cm cm cm cm cm 1000 1500 50 500 1000 1000 1500 1000 10 50 300 1000 2000 1000 1500 50 10 1000 2000 300 50 1000 2000 1000 1500 50 10 1000 2000 300 30 10 300 1000 2000 1000 1500 1000
2002 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (1) (2) (3) (4) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) No 2,500 3 200 200 200 200 200 50 200 No, 3 1 2 00 No 2,500 200 7 2,000 7
-26-
-25- -26- -27- -28- -29- -30- -31- -32- -33- -34- -35- -36- -37- -38- cm -39- -40- 1 2 3 4 4 3 2 1 5 5-41- -42- -43- -44- -45- -46- -47- -48- -49- -50- cm -51- -52- -53- -54- -55- -56- -57- -58- -59- -60-
-1- 4 1 2 4-2- -- 2 2 cm 0 80cm 2 80cm 80cm 80cm 50cm 80cm 50cm 6 80cm 100 50 50 cm 10 6 4 50cm 4 4 50cm -4- -5- cm 50cm 4 4 4 50cm 50cm 4 80cm 50cm 80cm 50cm 6 cm -6- 20 250cm 1 2 1 4 0cm 60cm cm cm 1
untitled
() () () () () ( ) () ( ) () ( ) () 2 () () 2 () () ( ) () () () 2 () () 2 3 ( ) () ( ) 2 3 4 () () 2 3 4 () () ( )( ) ( ) 2 ( ) 3 () () 2 3 () () 2 3 () () () () () () () () (( ) ( ) (( ))( )( ) ) 2 3
河川砂防技術基準・基本計画編.PDF
4 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 2.1 1 2.2 2 2.3 2 2.4 2 3 2 4 3 2 4 1 4 1.1 4 1.2 4 2 4 2.1 4 2.2 4 2.3 5 2.4 5 2.5 5 2.5.1 5 2.5.2 5 2.6 5 2.6.1 5 2.6.2 5 2.6.3 5 2.6.4 5 2.6.5 6 2.7 6 2.7.1 6 2.7.2 6 2.7.3 6 2.7.4
4 100g
100g 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 4 5 7 9 12 15 19 24 60 100 10 80 100 20 10 5 20 195 20-1- 60 60 15 100 60 100 15 15 15 100 15 15 60 100 10 60 100 100 15 10 10 60 100 15 10 15 10 5-2- 80 80 24 100 80 100 24
... 6 1) 2) No. 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 No. 1 2 2 3 3cm 4 Web Microsoft 2008 R2 Database Database!! Database 04 08
Database Database Web http://www.microsoft.com/japan/sqlserver/2008/r2/solution/comparison/default.mspx Microsoft 2008 R2 Database Database!! 03 2009 6 1 Database 04 08 vs. Database 12 2008 R2 5 14! 5!
Fig. 1 Imminence of Tokyo Metropolitan Earthquakes (The committees for technical investigations on countermeasures for Tokyo Metropolitan Earthquakes,
Journal of Geography 116 (3/4) 490-503 2007 Damage Estimation of the Next Tokyo Metropolitan Earthquake and Mitigation Measures Koji IKEUCHI* and Natsuo ITO* Abstract The Central Disaster Management Council
untitled
186 17 100160250 1 10.1 55 2 18.5 6.9 100 38 17 3.2 17 8.4 45 3.9 53 1.6 22 7.3 100 2.3 31 3.4 47 OR OR 3 1.20.76 63.4 2.16 4 38,937101,118 17 17 17 5 1,765 1,424 854 794 108 839 628 173 389 339 57 6 18613
untitled
1. 3 14 2. 1 12 9 7.1 3. 5 10 17 8 5500 4. 6 11 5. 1 12 101977 1 21 45.31982.9.4 79.71996 / 1997 89.21983 41.01902 6. 7 5 10 2004 30 16.8 37.5 3.3 2004 10.0 7.5 37.0 2004 8. 2 7 9. 6 11 46 37 25 55 10.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 5 資 料 編 4 要 望 書 2011 6 12 6.11 6.11 6 10 129 87 6 11 6.11 29 5 資 料 編 4 要 望 書 30 5 資 料 編 4 要 望 書 6 10 2 31 5 資 料 編 4 要 望 書 32 9
第33回鋼構造基礎講座 鋼橋の架設および解体撤去工法－より一層の安全性と品質の向上に向けて－
1 2 600000 500000 400000 300000 200000 117910 100000 15058 0 33343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10111213141516171819202122232425262728 3 140000 200 120000 100000
COPYRIGHT SOMPO JAPAN RISK MANAGEMENT, INC. 2009 1
リスクマネジメントにおける 定量評価手法について Various Risk Quantification Method in Risk Management 株式会社 損保ジャパン リスクマネジメント ERM事業部 阿知波 正道 Sompo Japan Risk Management, Inc. ERM Dept. Masamichi Achiwa GITA-JAPAN S 20TH ANNUAL
低所得高齢者の実態と求められる所得保障制度
30 4 (2012 1 ) pp2332 1 2 3 4 5 6 2011 6 65 5.4 1.6 *13 1.6 7 5.4 *14 7 10 *18 8 Guaranteed Income Supplement :GIS*19 34 23 9 *21 2003 *23 60 137.35 7 125 209.70 11 2011 Income Support)25 67.50 18 105.95
<8C8B8D872E706466>
Tips for Personal Safety in Japan (English & Japanese) AFS Intercultural Programs, Japan AFS Table of Contents Copyright Fire and Disaster Management
橡最終原稿.PDF
GIS Simulation analysis of disseminate of disaster information using GIS * ** *** Toshitaka KATADAJunsaku ASADA and Noriyuki KUWASAWA GIS GIS AbstractWe have developed the simulation model expressing the
医 事 法 山口大法医 藤宮龍也
2 ( If anything can go wrong, it will. Things go wrong in batches. MiniMax (mini) (max) ( ) - 134 135 105 149 1) 2) 3) cf. cf. - 160-214 cf. - 211 209,210-204 vs 35 37-19 217 218-202 203 cf. - ( ) 104
橡災害.PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 2.1 2.2 2.2.1 13 2.2.2 2.2.3 14 2.3 2.3.1 2.3.2 all or nothing 2.4. 2.4.1 15 i) ii) iii) iv) 2.5 2.4.2 2.2 2.5 2.5.1 16 2.5.2 2.6 2.6.1 2.4 2.6.2 2.6.3 2.6.4 17 18 3.2.1 Hazard
untitled
http://www.ecompliance.co.jp 1.0 2006/05/26 Copyright(C) 2006 ecompliance Ltd. All Rights Reserved. Page 1 1.... 4 2.... 4 3.... 4 3.1... 4 3.2... 4 3.3... 4 3.4... 4 4.... 4 4.1... 4 4.2... 5 4.3... 5
07_太田美帆.indd
54 2013 pp. 167 190 2011 3 11 1 2 8 2014 1 6 167 54 133 2 2011 3 11 3 4 5 3 / 168 3 2013 11 133 NPO 6 PBV PBV 0 3 2012 3157 1 501076 99 11,427 PBV 67,991 7 254 1 PBV PBV PBV PBV 2011 2011 2012 5 5 6,695
untitled
21 COE Center for Urban Earthquake Engineering Tokyo Institute of Technology 2006 3 20 20 th March 2006 No.4 1 2005 9 25 29 5 Taiwan-Japan Symposium on Advancement of Urban Earthquake Hazard Mitigation
橡report.PDF
10 3 45 9 () Knowing Hazard Visualization of Crustal Strain in the Japanese Islands using GPS Data GPS Eric N. Oware Mitigation (SAR) (DIS) Preparedness Response & Recovery (SAR) Information Dissemination
首都直下地震における地方財政への影響
ESRI Discussion Paper Series No.241 首都直下地震における地方財政への影響 宮崎毅 August 2010 内閣府経済社会総合研究所 Economic and Social Research Institute Cabinet Office Tokyo, Japan ESRI ディスカッション ペーパー シリーズは 内閣府経済社会総合研究所の研究者および外部研究者によって行われた研究成果をとりまとめたものです
72 10 7 5 1 2 3 1. Prevention/Mitigation Preparedness Response Relief/Recovery 6 5 2011 52-57 6 mitigation 23 6 25 35-36
71 1 2011 23 3 11 2 10 Operation Tomodachi UNOCHA SIPRI 3 4 1 2 23 6 25 3 SIPRI, The Effectiveness of Foreign Military Assets in Natural Disaster Response (Stockholm: SIPRI, 2008), p. 9. 4 Wilton Park
University of New South WalesSchool of Safety Science Indiana University of Pennsylvania University of Central Missouri Department of Safety Science (
GDP 2 WHO SARS O157 JR 1 University of New South WalesSchool of Safety Science Indiana University of Pennsylvania University of Central Missouri Department of Safety Science () 2 CSR BCP () 3 () 2 4 2
環境マネジメントシステムが抱える課題と対応策――ISO14001の取り組み現場から
SJRM S J R M R i s k R e v i e w 9 ISO 14001 Issues and Actions on Environmental Management Systems (EMS): From the Consulting Field of the ISO 14001 Environmental Management System: EMS 1 EMS ISO 14001
光学基金報告会資料 最終版.ppt
2012 5 17 AIJ 2012/5/17 Oval Risk-Management Services Inc., All Rights Reserved 1 2012/5/17 Oval Risk-Management Services Inc., All Rights Reserved 2 22 No.93 2011 November 3 86 63 1 49 9 18 56
untitled
http://www.riskdatabank.co.jp The of Japan, Ltd. All rights reserved. 2 The of Japan, Ltd. All rights reserved. 3 The of Japan, Ltd. All rights reserved. 4 The of Japan, Ltd. All rights reserved. 5 The
Vol.54 No (Mar. 2013) 1,a) , A Case Study of the Publication of Information on the Japan Earthquake Naoto Matsumoto 1,a
1,a) 2012 6 1, 2012 12 20 A Case Study of the Publication of Information on the Japan Earthquake Naoto Matsumoto 1,a) Received: June 1, 2012, Accepted: December 20, 2012 Abstract: On the disasters, the
タイにおける洪水の概要と被害状況――洪水の概要および日系企業への影響について
NKSJ-RM 61 Fumihiro Katano Shohei Hashimoto 2011 10 10 17 1 420 1. 2011 7 10 14 77 28 10 ) 1.1. 10 15 77 61 248 856 297 600 900 1 = 2.5 10 10 GDP 0.6 0.9 11 1 Copyright 2011 NKSJ Risk Management, Inc.
APU win-win
APU win-win ACPA PMBOK PMBOK Project Management Institute, PMI Project Management Body of Knowledge PMBOK RR R R.%.% PMI PMBOK PMI PMBOK PMBOK PMBOK PMBOK PMBOK PDCAPlan- Do-Check-ActPMBOK PDCA PMBOK PDCA
14_井上洋.indd
10 205 241 2015 6 205 The disaster response laws and regulations in the early Meiji Hiroshi INOUE 1868 1885 18 1868 26 22 13 22 10 7 1868 1 1885 18 2 3 1885 4 10 5 206 5 17 395 1962 7 10 36 223 8 109 9
untitled
22 23 3 1...1 1...1 2...2 3...3 4...4 2...5 1...5 2...8 3...9 1...9 2... 15 3... 17 4 US&R... 19 5 US&R... 22 6 US&R... 24 7... 26 4... 27 1... 27 2... 28 1... 28 2... 29 3... 32 4... 35 5... 37 3...
20120928_Business_r1_01
rev1.01 9/28/2012 Satoshi Matsushita Stanford CS Visiting Scholar, NEC matsushi@stanford.edu CPU HW SW 1 1945 1970-25 1985 DRAM 1991 1993 Samsung DRAM 2011 2012 25 21? 100 40 21 2 .. IR... 1988 301 3 blog
スライド 1
NIST SP800 BCPContingency Contingency Planning 200621 1. IPAIPA 2. BCP/BCM 3. NIST SP800 FISMA 4. SP800-53 5. SP800-34 IT Contingency Planning Guide for Information Technology Systems IT January 2004 2
Microsoft Word - mitomi_v06.doc
MSS mitomi@edm.bosai.go.jp matsuoka@edm.bosai.go.jp yamazaki@edm.bosai.go.jp taniguchi@manage.nitech.ac.jp 1 MSS MSS 2 2 1 m MSS CCT CCT Fig.1 CCT b02-b0 b0-b0b-b b-b1 CCT Landsat/TM MSS S/N 21x21 21x21
2 3 3 3 5 6 7 9 12 13 14 16 17 17 18 1
IT RISK MANAGEMENT 2 3 3 3 5 6 7 9 12 13 14 16 17 17 18 1 2 3 4 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 5 5 4 3 2 1 0 6 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 8 9 10 11 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 787 1,289 1,315 1,493 1,183 1,285 1,416
財務省-NGO 協議会 NT2
-NGO 2005 4 12 17 19 422 NGO JACSES FoE Japan 4 WB ADB 3 31 NGO 2 2 1997 ADB NGO 1 97 9 2 2 Decision Framework 3 3 NGPES 2 2 ADB 2009 5 ADB 2 Decision Framework 2 ADB Adaptive 3 Voting ADB 4 4 MOF Decision
2 RAD-AR News Vol.14, No.5 (Jan. 2004)
Series No. 60Jan. 2004 CONTENTS 2 RAD-AR News Vol.14, No.5 (Jan. 2004) 3 4 RAD-AR News Vol.14, No.5 (Jan. 2004) 5 RAD-AR News Vol.14, No.5 (Jan. 2004) 6 7 RAD-AR News Vol.14, No.5 (Jan. 2004) 8 9 1100
00 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.... 0........ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0..0..........0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.... 0........ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0... 0...... 0... 0 0 0 0 0 0..0 0... 0 0 0 0 0.0.....0.
46 29 12 47 48 28 10 3 49 -17- S53 288.67 100 -- S53 328.11 40-23-12 S56 372.77 40 -- S62 304.99 40-12-10 S57 202.57 100 --16 S58 368.52 40 -- S59 396.31 100-14-13 S63 307.98 40 --20 S60 337.60 40 --
untitled
SUMMARY This paper surveys the foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) control policy implemented by the national and Miyazaki prefectural governments during the pandemic from April to July 2010. Several lessons
identity outreach aggressive casework assessment accountability action system accessibility advocacy medical model enabling medical social work intergroup work intervention intake integration informal
Appropriate Disaster Preparedness Education in Classrooms According to Students Grade, from Kindergarten through High School Contrivance of an Educati
Appropriate Disaster Preparedness Education in Classrooms According to Students Grade, from Kindergarten through High School Contrivance of an Education of Disaster Preparedness System and Class Practice