EU 1) EU NATO EU 2) 3) Bridge 4) EU
|
|
|
- ゆき さわなか
- 9 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 EU EU
2 EU 1) EU NATO EU 2) 3) Bridge 4) EU
3 1) Olivier Roy (de.), TURKEY TODAY A Enropean country?, London, Anthem Press, 2004, p.1. 2) I bid., p.2. 3) I bid., p.5. 4) I bid., p.4. 1) 2) Republic of Turkey 3)
4 // GDP GDP 4) BCAD 5)
5 EU AKP EU 6) NATOOECD OSCEWTOOIC BSECECO EU 7) 1) ) ) JETRO 2005/05/27http : // 4) ) 340 6) )
6 AKP 1) 2) 3) GDP 4) 5) GDP GDP The Economist Intelligence Unit, Country Profile 2007, Turkey
7 IMF IMF TFIAThe Turkish Foreign Investors Association IMF
8 6) GDP IMF 7) 8) 9) GDP 10)
9 GDP 11) IMF IMF 12) GDP GDP 13) EU EU
10 14) 15) 16) 17) 18) 19) 1) Ed James, Special Report : Turkey, MEED (Middle East Econonic Digest), Vol.48, No.34 (2026 August 2004), P.1 2) Ibid., P.25 3) ARC ) Country Rrofile 2007, Turkey, London, The Economist Intelligence Unit2007, P.37. 5) Ibid., p.62.
11 6) Ibid., pp ) ARC ) JETRO ) Middle East Review 2005Essex, World of Information2005, p ) Ibid., p ) Ibid., p ) 7/13http:// 2007/05/29 13) Middle East Review 2005op.cit., p ) Ibid., p ) ) Middle East Review 2005op.cit., p ) Ed James, op. cit., p26. 18) 6/13 19) Ed James, op. cit., p26. EU AKP AKP EU IMF AKP
12 EU EEC EEC EC EC EC EC EC EC EU EU JETRO EU EU
13 1) EU EU EU EU EU 2) EU EU 3) EU EU EU 4) EU EU EFTAthe European Free Tnade Association EU 5)
14 EU 6) EU 7) 8) AKP EU 9) 1) Ed James, Special Report : Turkey, MEED,Vol.48, No.34 (2026 August 2004), pp ) Middle East Review 2005, Essex, World of Information, 2005, p ) Olivier Roy (ed.), Turkey TodayA European country?,london, Anthem Press, 2004, p.5. 4) Middle East Review 2005, op. cit., p ) Ibid., p ) MEED,2026 Aug. 2004, op. cit., p.25. 7) 3/13http:// 2007/05/29 8) EU ) Middle East Review 2005op. cit., p237. EU IMF
15 1) 2) 3) 4) EU EU 5) EU KKTC EU 6) EU AKP AKP EU 7)
16 8) EU EU EU 9) EU 10) 11) 12) 13) 14) 1) Ed James, Special Report : Turkey, MEED,Vol.48, No.34 (2026 August 2004), p 26. 2) ) 24 4) Country Rrofile 2007, Turkey, London, The Economist Intelligence Unit, 2007, P 37. 5) Olivier Roy (ed.), Turkey TodayA European country?,london, Anthem Press, 2004, pp56.
17 6) Middle East Review 2005, Essex, World of Information, 2005, p ) Ibid., pp ) ) JETRO EU 5/6 file://c: DOCUME l n-nagao LOCALS l Temp PH3GS7D6.htm2005/05/27 10) ) ) ) ) 202
18
19 HP
スライド 1
2030 (2004) 1 2 3 1 212004 5.5203031 (1) 2004GDP () 2030GDP )1 2122005 21 2 ASEAN+5 3 207.3EU8.03.3 (2004) 4 10 22.8 16.11 121,006 100 593,369 100 19,715 16 247,813 42 34,217 28 88,772 15 6,832 6 43,746
p. 137 p. 136 PIIGS STUPID EC PIIGS EC
p. 137 p. 136 PIIGS STUPID EC PIIGS EC GDP.. EU GDP European Monetary Union since 1848 E U EU EU GDP pp. 63 64 EU Newsweek EU BNP ECB CDS CDS CDS CDS Newsweek CDS ISDA CDS CDS p. 68 p. 107 pp. 107 108
商学 ６５‐５☆／１０．上田
635 4 NEM 1990 M&A 1 2 M& A 2013 2014 1 6500 10 3 M&A UFJ Tax Haven 55 ICT FDI 636 UNCTADWorld Investment Report 2011 Non-Equity Modes of International Production and Development Foreign Direct Investment
km 2 7, AKP Adalet ve Kalkinma Partisi AKP AKP EU IMF AKP GNI 5,
3 3-1 3-1-1 1. 2780.576km 2 7,20620057 99 1982 2. 5504 5 81 194920077 AKPAdalet ve Kalkinma Partisi20024782 AKP AKPEUIMF AKP 3-1-2 GNI5,4082006 220001120012IMF 19992002206 3-1 20022006GDP7 199884.72006
ロシア経済、光と陰
2004/06/14 9 25 EU 8 95 EU 19952002 GDP 3.6 28.0% EU EU 1.3 11.2 1 2002 0.8 EU 57 1989 EU EU EU 2 PHARE ISPA SAPARD 20042006 408 1973 EC 90 1 2004/06/14 9 25 WIIW 1 1995 2002 80 EU 16 EU 6.5 5 15 20 1,120
untitled
1 Report 3 4 8 10 14 16 Topics 18 18 19 19 20 20 21 21 22 23 Information 25 25 2013.9 No.80 1 2 2013.9 No.80 Report 2013.9 No.80 3 4 2013.9 No.80 2013.9 No.80 5 6 2013.9 No.80 2013.9 No.80 7 8 2013.9 No.80
鈴木雄雅様P1〜22
0288 5913 1 23 79 105 2 6 149 161 169 175 2004 2005 2 2004 100 2005 100 235 53 2005 44 2004 2 225 223 1973 60 9 11 2001 11 2004 41 2005 1 4 20 19 Hiogo and Osaka Herald 1868 1 4 Hiogo News 1868 4 23 Kobe
æ 1 2 3 rentier state s rent æ æ 1 Zanoyan 2 Gambill æ 3 æ 1987 Luciani Beblawi The Rentier State 4 Luciani Beblawi Luciani 40 æ World Development Indicators 10 1 UNDP 10 / æ æ No.37 2004 19 æ Sadowski
取扱説明書
ED-601 ED-501 ED-401 2 3 4 23 14 5 6 18 10 7 1 2 6 3 4 8 9 16 16 16 12 1 2 18 10 2 1 5 12 11 1 2 1 2 12 1 2 13 16 14 3 2 4 1 1 2 16 3 4 18 15 1 2 16 2 3 1 1 2 3 18 17 18 22 19 D A C 20 A B 22 B C D 22
.T.C.Y._.E..
25 No.33 C O N T E N T S REVIEW 1 2 5 4 3 6 7 8 9 1 11 1, 1, 7,5 75 916,95 (121) 756,67 (15) 718,89 (13) 91,496 (169) 54,2 (179) 3,243 (75) 727,333 (129) 564,47 (112) 55,458 (11) 6,68,953 (18) 5,624,957
596_H1H4.indd
2014 Aug. 8No.596 http://www.saitama-ctv-kyosai.net 1021 1125 1127 10 10 27 11 11 17 11 11 20 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
野村資本市場研究所｜アジアの金融競争力（PDF）
2013 Spring 1. GDP 3 26% 2. 3. 4. GDP 1 GDP 2000 25.4% 2012 10 IMF 1 GDP 28.7%GDP 10.7% 20.3% 2000 2012 10 2 3 2000 2012 4.2 5.4 2 2000 14% 2012 26% GDP 2012 30 10 32003 11 2013 Spring 100% 2 90% 80% 70%
Association of South East Asian Nations: ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN
Association of South East Asian Nations: ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN Free Trade Agreement: FTA FTA ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN The European Union: EU
看護・介護分野における外国人労働者の受け入れ問題
1111 12 16 1610 1723 1725 1725 1729 FTA EPA 16 2004 11 EPA 18 2006 FTA 17 2005 1 4 2006. POEA AOTS 2 EPA 3 care giver 4 FTA 2005.7.28. ; http://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/area/thailand/j_thai_kyotei. html 20051215
54“ƒŒ{Ł¶flÅ›º-1
Nobuyo Tanaka 2004 5 EU 8 EU EU EU EU EU 1.3 11.2 1 2002 2004 5 EU 8 95 EU 1995 2002 GDP 3.6 28.0% EU EU 3 0.8 2002 2001 2002 Winter 2003 / No.54 3 EU 5 7 1989 EU EU EU EU EU 2 4 Winter 2003 / No.54 PHARE
中国のイスラム教徒―歴史と現況
2003.9.25. 38 56 56 91 1,618 1,068 982 894 840 776 803 581 542 55 1949 1950 1970 50 2,030 China Daily, October 16, 2003., 1988, pp.55-56. 2000 2003, 2003, p.356. 39 55 55 55 1945, 1999, p.68. Thomas Herber,
![宅建練馬表478号1_4ol [更新済み].eps](/thumbs/39/20197934.jpg "宅建練馬表478号1_4ol [更新済み].eps")
28 GCC UAE GCC (2) 大きく上昇した食料価格と住居費 GCC GCC GCC 図表 2 湾岸協力会議 (GCC) 諸国の消費者物価上昇率 (28 年 ) 図表 3 湾岸協力会議 (GCC) 諸国の消費者物価指数に占める食料品と住居費の割合
アジアの視点 インフレ圧力の高まりに苦慮する湾岸協力会議 (GCC) 諸国 調査部環太平洋戦略研究センター 上席主任研究員 高安健一 はじめに Gulf Cooperation Council: GCC 28 GCC GCC 27 6.1 UAE 11.13.8 GCC 1. インフレ高進の背景 (1) 高インフレ地域に転じたGCC 19922 GCC GCC98 22.1 図表 1 湾岸協力会議
8
7 8 9 1 1-1 1-2 2002 1 2000 10 1-3 2002 2 2000 11 2 3 WHO19951979 19952002p.47 4 22 5 12 2-1 18681919 6 1965 13 2-2 19201945 14 15 2-3 19461960 7 16 17 2-4 19611979 GDP 18 1956300 2,000 1960 11 1972 231006
01 川瀬進 72号 リュウミンＬ
Austin Lane Poole, From Domesday Book to Magna Carta 1087-1216, in George Clark, ed., The Oxford History of England, Vol. 3, Second Edition, reprinted of 1955, ed., Oxford University Press, 1986, p. 341.
73 p.1 22 16 2004p.152
1987 p.80 72 73 p.1 22 16 2004p.152 281895 1930 1931 12 28 1930 10 27 12 134 74 75 10 27 47.6 1910 1925 10 10 76 10 11 12 139 p.287 p.10 11 pp.3-4 1917 p.284 77 78 10 13 10 p.6 1936 79 15 15 30 80 pp.499-501
2 2 3 4 5 5 2 7 3 4 6 1 3 4 7 4 2 2 2 4 2 3 3 4 5 1932 A p. 40. 1893 A p. 224, p. 226. 1893 B pp. 1 2. p. 3.
1 73 72 1 1844 11 9 1844 12 18 5 1916 1 11 72 1 73 2 1862 3 1870 2 1862 6 1873 1 3 4 3 4 7 2 3 4 5 3 5 4 2007 p. 117. 2 2 3 4 5 5 2 7 3 4 6 1 3 4 7 4 2 2 2 4 2 3 3 4 5 1932 A p. 40. 1893 A p. 224, p. 226.
() L () 20 1
() 25 1 10 1 0 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 2 3 4 9308510 4432193 L () 20 1 PP 200,000 P13P14 3 0123456 12345 1234561 2 4 5 6 25 1 10 7 1 8 10 / L 10 9 10 11 () ( ) TEL 23 12 7 38 13 14 15 16 17 18 L 19 20 1000123456
戦後の補欠選挙
1 2 11 3 4, 1968, p.429., pp.140-141. 76 2005.12 20 14 5 2110 25 6 22 7 25 8 4919 9 22 10 11 12 13 58154 14 15 1447 79 2042 21 79 2243 25100 113 2211 71 113 113 29 p.85 2005.12 77 16 29 12 10 10 17 18
日経テレコン料金表（2016年4月）
1 2 3 4 8,000 15,000 22,000 29,000 5 6 7 8 36,000 42,000 48,000 54,000 9 10 20 30 60,000 66,000 126,000 166,000 50 100 246,000 396,000 1 25 8,000 7,000 620 2150 6,000 4,000 51100 101200 3,000 1,000 201
122011pp.139174 18501933
122011pp.139174 18501933 122011 1850 3 187912 3 1850 8 1933 84 4 1871 12 1879 5 2 1 9 15 1 1 5 3 3 3 6 19 9 9 6 28 7 7 4 1140 9 4 3 5750 58 4 3 1 57 2 122011 3 4 134,500,000 4,020,000 11,600,000 5 2 678.00m
29 2011 3 4 1 19 5 2 21 6 21 2 21 7 2 23 21 8 21 1 20 21 1 22 20 p.61 21 1 21 21 1 23
29 2011 3 pp.55 86 19 1886 2 13 1 1 21 1888 1 13 2 3,500 3 5 5 50 4 1959 6 p.241 21 1 13 2 p.14 1988 p.2 21 1 15 29 2011 3 4 1 19 5 2 21 6 21 2 21 7 2 23 21 8 21 1 20 21 1 22 20 p.61 21 1 21 21 1 23 1
Microsoft Word - 映画『東京裁判』を観て.doc
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2008. 2 2010, 3 2010. p.1 4 2008 p.202 5 2008. p.228 6 2011. 7 / 2008. pp.3-4 1 8 1 9 10 11 8 2008, p.7 9 2011. p.41 10.51 11 2009. p. 2 12 13 14 12 2008. p.4 13 2008, p.7-8 14 2008. p.126
308 ( ) p.121
307 1944 1 1920 1995 2 3 4 5 308 ( ) p.121 309 10 12 310 6 7 ( ) ( ) ( ) 50 311 p.120 p.142 ( ) ( ) p.117 p.124 p.118 312 8 p.125 313 p.121 p.122 p.126 p.128 p.156 p.119 p.122 314 p.153 9 315 p.142 p.153
自殺防止のために国が実施できる政策について
10 1998 8,2611,755 32 1899 82 18 646 701 1722 13 1880 1933 10 1998 13 2001 14 2002 12 2003. 17 10 suisidology 11 12 13 14 18 2003. 15 WHO WHO, WHO Statistical Information System (WHOSIS) 16 WHO, Suicide