LRT 4 FUKAYAMA, Takeshi KATO, Hironori SHIROYAMA, Hideaki 1 1.1 184 LRTLight Rail Transit 1 LRT 10203050 LRT LRT 1 JR LRT 2 LRTLRT 18910 1.2 LRT 022 Vol.10 No.1 2007 Spring
framing 2 3 reframing 4 LRT LRT LRT LRT 5 2LRT 3 4 5 6 2LRT 2.1 LRT 42179 72 3 JR JR8.0km 45,000 16 10 1 4 15 JR LRT LRT JR3 5 7,000 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 46,920 / 0 0 S63 H1 H2 H3 H4 H5 H6 H7 H8 H9 H10 H11 H12 H13 H14 H15 H16 6,399 5,828 4,601 45,350 6pp.34 3,115 50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 Vol.10 No.1 2007 Spring 023
Vol.10 No.1 2007 Spring 024 2.2 LRT 2LRT JR 1.1km 6.5km 10 LRT IC 1 2.3 LRT 6 1 15.5 2418.558 33 8 LRT7 2 9 LRT 1/2 LRT17 LRV IC 1/4 7 LRT 13 JR10 3 JR 6 2 17 26,200 13,5007,000 3010 115 2123 19/66/ 7 5 2 IC 617 13 33 8 7 10 58 17 4 2 23 8 1 9 8 4 1 13 3 10 13 LRT HP
5,700 7 8 15,2644,912 6,010 8 4,2001.3 LRTJR2,266 17102.3 3LRT 3 349,800 16,5008,000 49.2 25,30050.8 7 9 PR 2.4 4188 3.1 LRT 155 141 4174 LRT H7.7 H11.3 H11 H12 H13 H15 H15.1 H15.5 H15.7 H15.11 H16.1 H16.3 H16.4 H16.5 H16.10 H16.11 H17.2 H17.3 H17.4 H18.4 JR LRT JR 3 LRT JR LRT LRT 6 Vol.10 No.1 2007 Spring 025
7 LRT 3 7184 LRT 155 211 124 LRT 3.2 H712 1 LRT 77 9 11JR LRT 7 2 12 12 10 3 113 8 7 10 11 11 12 LRT LRT LRT 3.3 H1315 1 13 026 Vol.10 No.1 2007 Spring
3 3JR JR JR JR JRLRT 3 2 12 13 15 LRT 152JR 12 LRT 3.4 H1516 6p.6 LRTJR LRT 11 1 LRT 151LRT 155 7 13 3 3 14 18LRT 2 4,200/5,000/ Vol.10 No.1 2007 Spring 027
23 10 4 1 6 11 15 219 238 19 206 229 23 243 231 12 234 232 2 13p.15 33 3 3 600m 15 100 2 IC 14 LRT 60km/h 40km/h 7 15 3 163 JR 15 164 3 3 4 LRT 1511 16 LRT 028 Vol.10 No.1 2007 Spring
11 LRT 4 LRT 6 LRT9 17 LRT 18 2.31 LRTLRT 3 131 3.5 1618 6p.1 5 165LRT 6 16 17 1 LRT 26 184 LRT 184 2 1610 11 172 3 4 7 LRT Vol.10 No.1 2007 Spring 029
LRT 19 LRT 6 164 3LRT 183JR DC1,500VDC600V 184LRT 4 LRT 70 6 2 LRT 9 5 3.6 6 13 LRT Vol.10 No.1 2007 Spring 030 H712 H1315 H1516 H1618 LRT H 13 LRT 3 H 15 LRT H 16
LRT 5 H15.7 LRT H15.11 H15.11 H16.4 4 4.1 JR LRT 6 4.2 LRT JR LRT LRT LRT 155 LRT 7 156 78LRT N703 13 7 8 4.3 LRT Vol.10 No.1 2007 Spring 031
LRT LRT 20 LRT LRT LRT 21 4.4 22 JR JR LRT 23 4.5 5 LRT LRT 4.6 LRT LRT PR LRT LRT 032 Vol.10 No.1 2007 Spring
Vol.10 No.1 2007 Spring 033 LRT LRT LRT LRT LRT LRT LRT LRT JRJRLRT JR LRT LRT LRT LRT 5 5.1 LRT LRT LRT 5.2 LRT LRT 24
5.3 5 7 21 LRT LRT 5.4 LRT 31 LRT LRT 8712 15LRT H711 H15 H16 LRT 034 Vol.10 No.1 2007 Spring
Vol.10 No.1 2007 Spring 035 5.5 LRT LRT 1 5.6 1 6 LRT 4 LRT 39 9LRT LRT
PFIPPP 25,26 LRT JR B 1LRT 155 211 LRT 2 18 311 4616103 47 1025/ 1123/1319/ 6 5 3 100 6JR JR JRJR 39JR10 JR 7 8 LRT LRT 9 1012 11 LRT 12 15 19 13 14224 115304 13 15163 16 1666 17166 18166 20 19 JR 20 21 13 036 Vol.10 No.1 2007 Spring
22212 JR 23 24LRTin18420 25 PFIPPP 26 LRT Why has a new LRT system been introduced successfully in Toyama City? An analysis from a viewpoint of policy process management By Takeshi FUKAYAMA, Hironori KATO and Hideaki SHIROYAMA This paper analyzes a policy process and discusses a role of policy process management in a light transit rail (LRT) investment. As a case study, we analyze a LRT introduction at Toyama City, Japan. First, we review the policy process of this case. We pick up the stakeholders, list the main issues and identify the frame of each stakeholder at four stages of the process. Then, we compare stakeholders' concerns. The results indicate that the local transport authority in Toyama City copes with the problems very well by controlling each stakeholder's frame and interest. We point out the importance of the policy process management including an appropriate vision setting, the political leadership, the discussion opportunity arrangement, a commitment timing control, the constraint management and the outsider's involvement. Key Words : light rail transit, town planning, policy process management, framing, consensus building Vol.10 No.1 2007 Spring 037