2 1 ( ) 2 ( ) i

Similar documents
ron.dvi

21 Effects of background stimuli by changing speed color matching color stimulus

24 Depth scaling of binocular stereopsis by observer s own movements

25 D Effects of viewpoints of head mounted wearable 3D display on human task performance

14 CRT Color Constancy in the Conditions of Dierent Cone Adaptation in a CRT Display

untitled

i

2

2 ( ) i

NotePC 8 10cd=m 2 965cd=m Note-PC Weber L,M,S { i {

29 Short-time prediction of time series data for binary option trade

<4D F736F F F696E74202D C835B B E B8CDD8AB B83685D>

SC-85X2取説


25 Removal of the fricative sounds that occur in the electronic stethoscope



23 A Comparison of Flick and Ring Document Scrolling in Touch-based Mobile Phones

九州大学学術情報リポジトリ Kyushu University Institutional Repository 看護師の勤務体制による睡眠実態についての調査 岩下, 智香九州大学医学部保健学科看護学専攻 出版情報 : 九州大学医学部保健学



活用ガイド (ソフトウェア編)

Kyushu Communication Studies 第2号

浜松医科大学紀要

II

これわかWord2010_第1部_ indd

パワポカバー入稿用.indd

これでわかるAccess2010

25 AR 3 Property of three-dimensional perception in the wearable AR environment


駒田朋子.indd

平成18年版 男女共同参画白書

III


Core Ethics Vol.

先端社会研究 ★5★号/4.山崎

28 Horizontal angle correction using straight line detection in an equirectangular image

24 Perceived depth position of autostereoscopic stimulus

DOUSHISYA-sports_R12339(高解像度).pdf

29 jjencode JavaScript

NO

soturon.dvi

28 TCG SURF Card recognition using SURF in TCG play video

ii

〈論文〉高校生の学校適応と社会的スキルおよびソーシャルサポートとの関連--不登校生徒との比較


,,.,.,,.,.,.,.,,.,..,,,, i


udc-2.dvi

エクセルカバー入稿用.indd

paper.dvi

i


Wide Scanner TWAIN Source ユーザーズガイド

,,,,., C Java,,.,,.,., ,,.,, i

kut-paper-template.dvi

27 VR Effects of the position of viewpoint on self body in VR environment

28 Docker Design and Implementation of Program Evaluation System Using Docker Virtualized Environment

日本感性工学会論文誌

01_.g.r..

untitled

橡

i

1..FEM FEM 3. 4.


, IT.,.,..,.. i

四校_目次~巻頭言.indd


II

授受補助動詞の使用制限に与える敬語化の影響について : 「くださる」「いただく」を用いた感謝表現を中心に

22 Google Trends Estimation of Stock Dealing Timing using Google Trends

n 2 n (Dynamic Programming : DP) (Genetic Algorithm : GA) 2 i

(Visual Secret Sharing Scheme) VSSS VSSS 3 i

, (GPS: Global Positioning Systemg),.,, (LBS: Local Based Services).. GPS,.,. RFID LAN,.,.,.,,,.,..,.,.,,, i


〈論文〉興行データベースから「古典芸能」の定義を考える

,.,.,,.,. X Y..,,., [1].,,,.,,.. HCI,,,,,,, i


活用ガイド (ソフトウェア編)

IT,, i

Web Web Web Web Web, i

<836F F312E706466>

Core Ethics Vol. QOL N N N N N N N K N N

困ったときのQ&A

On the Wireless Beam of Short Electric Waves. (VII) (A New Electric Wave Projector.) By S. UDA, Member (Tohoku Imperial University.) Abstract. A new e

07_伊藤由香_様.indd

社会学部紀要 119号☆/表紙(119)

220 28;29) 30 35) 26;27) % 8.0% 9 36) 8) 14) 37) O O 13 2 E S % % 2 6 1fl 2fl 3fl 3 4

17 The Analysis of Hand-Writing datas for pen-input character boxes

日本感性工学会論文誌

I N S T R U M E N T A T I O N & E L E C T R I C A L E Q U I P M E N T Pressure-resistant gasket type retreat method effective bulk compressibility Fro

入門ガイド


Core Ethics Vol. Sex Reassignment Surgery SRS SRS GID GID SRS GID GID GID GID GID QOL QOL QOL -- QOL

技術研究報告第26号

37 Studies on the Color Planning of Clothing The warm-cool evaluation of the skin and lipstick color and their matching Masashi KOBAYASHI Osaka Shoin

..,,,, , ( ) 3.,., 3.,., 500, 233.,, 3,,.,, i

ii



Transcription:

21 Perceptual relation bettween shadow, reflectance and luminance under aambiguous illuminations. 1100302 2010 3 1

2 1 ( ) 2 ( ) i

Abstract Perceptual relation bettween shadow, reflectance and luminance under aambiguous illuminations. Syoichi Shinoda In this research we tested how the surface reflectance and the illuminant affect the perception of shadow. And also we tested how the shadow affects our perception of the reflectance and the brightness of object s surface. We conducted two types of experiments to reveal above things. The first experiment, which examined how the perception affects what people think is the shadow of a different intensity of light spotlighting the floor with different reflectivity. As a result, perception seems to shadow, otherwise the results are in contrast with the case decided by the people. The strength of the shadows and sounds that people are not simply determined by brightness, surface color (reflectivity) went on to say that determine perceived light intensity and spotlighting. The second experiments, and investigated whether any influence on the perception of color and brightness of illumination light spots on the surface of the shadow. As a result, by that body and its shadow, Compared to the object and its shadow when there is no perception of light is spotlighting, The results obtained may be stronger than the brightness constancy. The study, perception of sounds and shadows of people are not only determined by a simple brightness, the color (reflectivity) of the surface have decided on the perception of light intensity and spotlighting. Also, some suggesting that it is possible that the ii

perception of brightness by the shadow. key words Shadow, Spotlight, Reflectance, Contrast iii

1 1 1.1...................................... 1 1.2...................................... 2 2 3 2.1................................ 3 2.2................................... 4 3 1 5 3.1................................... 5 3.1.1................................. 5 3.2...................................... 6 3.3................................... 7 3.4.................................... 7 3.5...................................... 8 3.5.1 S.S........................... 8 3.5.2 K.I........................... 9 3.5.3 Q.Q.......................... 9 3.5.4 S.M.......................... 10 3.5.5 R.T.......................... 10 3.6...................................... 11 3.6.1....................... 11 3.6.2..................... 16 4 2 17 iv

4.1................................... 17 4.1.1......................... 17 4.2...................................... 18 4.3................................... 19 4.4.................................... 20 4.5...................................... 20 4.5.1 Q.Q.......................... 21 4.5.2 S.M.......................... 22 4.5.3 R.T.......................... 23 4.5.4 R.T.......................... 24 4.6...................................... 25 5 27 28 29 v

2.1.................................... 3 2.2 1..................... 4 3.1 1..................... 6 3.2 S.S 1.......................... 8 3.3 K.I 1.......................... 9 3.4 Q.Q 1.......................... 9 3.5 S.M 1.......................... 10 3.6 R.T 1.......................... 10 3.7............ 11 3.8...................... 12 3.9.......................... 13 3.10 ( R.T)...................................... 15 3.11............ 16 4.1 2.................... 18 4.2 Q.Q 2 (Whiteness)................... 21 4.3 Q.Q 2 (Brightness).................. 21 4.4 S.M 2 (Whiteness)................... 22 4.5 S.M 2 (Brightness)................... 22 4.6 R.T 2 (Whiteness)................... 23 4.7 R.T 2 (Brightness)................... 23 4.8 T.N 2 (Whiteness)................... 24 vi

4.9 T.N 2 (Brightness)................... 24 4.10 None Object-Shadow................... 25 vii

3.1 1................................. 6 3.2.................... 11 3.3 α β...... 14 4.1 2 BG1.............................. 19 4.2 2 BG2.............................. 19 viii

1 1.1, [1] ( ) ( ) ( ),,,. Cast Shadow [2][3] 1 2 1

1.2 1.2 2 2

2 2.1., (Epson EMP-74 LCD projector). 2.1 2.1 2 3

2.2 2.2 1 2.2 2.2 3 0 Project Area RGB (0,0,0) 4

3 1 1 1 3.1 1, (Method of adjustment) 3.1.1 (Method of average error) (Method of reproduction)., ( ).,.,,.,,.,,, [4]. 1 RGB 5

3.2 3.2 1 (Object) 1cm Object 6cm 14cm 6cm 8cm 2cm 3.1 3.1 1 9.5%(C1) 88.3%(C2) 2 3 ( S1 S2 S3) 3.1 3.1 (cd/m 2 ) S1 S2 S3 C1 1.44 8.89 13.02 C2 13.36 82.63 121.0 S3C1 S1C2 6

3.3 3.3 1 3.1 12 6 3.4 1 5 S.S ( ) K.I ( ) Q.Q ( ) S.M ( ) R.T ( ) 7

3.5 3.5 1 12 UpLim(Upper Limit) LowLim(Lower Limit) App(Appropriate).B 9.5%(Black).W 88.3%(White) 3.5.1 S.S S.S 1 3.2 88.3% 3.2 S.S 1 8

3.5 3.5.2 K.I K.I 1 3.3 3.3 K.I 1 3.5.3 Q.Q Q.Q 1 3.4 3.4 Q.Q 1 9

3.5 3.5.4 S.M S.M 1 3.5 3.5 S.M 1 3.5.5 R.T R.T 1 3.6 3.6 R.T 1 10

3.6 3.6 3.6.1 ( 3.7(a) ) ( 3.7(b) ) 3.7 (a) (b) (a) S.M (b) Q.Q 3.2 3.2 S.S C2 I.K S.M R.T Q.Q 11

3.6 RGB (0,0,0) 3.8 1 3.8 ( Q.Q) E All E I = αe All + β (3.1) α β 12

3.6 R L c L s L c = E All R (3.2) L s = E I R = (αe All + β)r (3.3) 3.9 3.9 L s L c Contrast = L s L c (3.4) 3.4 3.2 3.3 Contrast = β R L c + α (3.5) 13

3.6 3.5 3.5 α β α β 3.3 3.3 α β α β S.S C2 Observer C1(9.5%) C2(88.3%) R.T α 0.3 0 β 2 1.5 Q.Q α 0.3 0 β 5.8 7 I.K α 0.13 0.05 β 0 0 S.M α 0.25 0.2 β 0 0 S.S α 0.07 - β 0.09 - R.T 3.10 3.3 α β α R.T Q.Q α β α C1 C2 0.3 0 I.K S.M S.M α C1 C2 0.25 0.2 R.T Q.Q α C1 C2 14

3.6 3.10 3.5 α β 3.3 α β C1 α C2 α α 0 β 0 I.K S.M C1 C2 β 0 15

3.6 3.6.2 2 S3C1 S1C2( 3.1 ) S3C1 S1C2 2 ( ) 3.11 3.11 UpLim LowLim AproShadow 16

4 2 2 1 4.1 2 (Magnitude estimastion) 4.1.1 ( ) 100 70 S R R = ks n (4.1) R S n [5] 17

4.2 2 100 0 (Whiteness) (Brightness) 4.2 2 3 L R T 4.1 4.1 2 Bar Bar L Bar 2 T (None) 1 Object (Object-Shadow) 2 RGB T 6 (C1 C6) 5 (S1 S5) 2 (BG1 BG2) 60 BG1 S1C6 59 4.1 4.2 Object-Shadow 18

4.3 S1 Object-Shadow BG1 23 BG2 24 47 4.1 BG1 (cd/m 2 ) Object-Shadow S1 (None 29 Object-Shadow 23 ) S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 C1 0.110 0.115 0.440 0.980 - C2 0.118 0.226 1.710 5.877 15.790 C3 0.264 0.683 4.380 15.073 44.053 C4 0.430 0.054 8.283 29.670 79.850 C5 0.638 1.786 12.733 44.577 133.043 C6 0.828 2.180 10.810 54.910 163.737 4.2 BG2 (cd/m 2 ) Object-Shadow S1 (None 30 Object-Shadow 24 ) S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 C1 0.115 0.343 0.513 1.374 2.432 C2 0.298 1.100 2.047 5.833 14.773 C3 0.796 2.610 5.087 16.547 36.507 C4 1.406 5.160 10.153 28.917 66.330 C5 2.067 7.863 15.597 44.503 114.070 C6 2.687 10.043 19.883 56.167 144.053 4.3 2?? L R T None (Whiteness) 4.1 4.2 59 19

4.4 (Brightness) Object-Shadow None (Whiteness) (Brightness) 6 4.4 2 4 Q.Q ( ) S.M ( ) R.T ( ) T.N ( ) 4.5 2 6 T 20

4.5 4.5.1 Q.Q Q.Q 2 (Whiteness) 4.2 (Brightness) 4.3 4.2 Q.Q 2 (Whiteness) 4.3 Q.Q 2 (Brightness) 21

4.5 4.5.2 S.M S.M 2 (Whiteness) 4.4 (Brightness) 4.5 4.4 S.M 2 (Whiteness) 4.5 S.M 2 (Brightness) 22

4.5 4.5.3 R.T R.T 2 (Whiteness) 4.6 (Brightness) 4.7 4.6 R.T 2 (Whiteness) 4.7 R.T 2 (Brightness) 23

4.5 4.5.4 R.T R.T 2 (Whiteness) 4.8 (Brightness) 4.9 4.8 T.N 2 (Whiteness) 4.9 T.N 2 (Brightness) 24

4.6 4.6 None T S.M R.T NoneBG1 R.T ( 4.6NoneBG1 ) None Object-Shadow T 4.10 4.10 R.T 2 None Object-Shadow None Object-Shadow Britghtness Object Object 25

4.6 Object T Object 26

5 1 2 None Object-Shadow Object 27

28

[1] CD 2000 [2] Vol.55 No.11 pp.1492-1498 2001 [3] 12 2000 [4] pp.22-23 2004 [5] pp.55-56 2004 29