1 [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 9, 10, 12, 15] The Boston Public Schools system, BPS (Deferred Acceptance system, DA) (Top Trading Cycles system, TTC) cf. [13] [

Similar documents

Kyushu Communication Studies 第2号


Web Web Web Web Web, i

16_.....E...._.I.v2006

<303288C991BD946797C797592E696E6464>


) ,

23 Study on Generation of Sudoku Problems with Fewer Clues

2 (S, C, R, p, q, S, C, ML ) S = {s 1, s 2,..., s n } C = {c 1, c 2,..., c m } n = S m = C R = {r 1, r 2,...} r r 2 C \ p = (p r ) r R q = (q r ) r R


産業構造におけるスポーツ産業の範囲に関する研究Ⅰ



149 (Newell [5]) Newell [5], [1], [1], [11] Li,Ryu, and Song [2], [11] Li,Ryu, and Song [2], [1] 1) 2) ( ) ( ) 3) T : 2 a : 3 a 1 :

JFE.dvi

2 ( ) i

<8ED089EF8B D312D30914F95742E696E6464>



00.\...ec5

Bull. of Nippon Sport Sci. Univ. 47 (1) Devising musical expression in teaching methods for elementary music An attempt at shared teaching

大学論集第42号本文.indb

第62巻 第1号 平成24年4月/石こうを用いた木材ペレット

IPSJ SIG Technical Report Vol.2016-CE-137 No /12/ e β /α α β β / α A judgment method of difficulty of task for a learner using simple

7,, i

116,/ / - /-, /1 /2 0 / ,, / 3 ing / , 2, 3, , 3,,. ISO. /.. 0 -,. ISO., 0-

1 Fig. 1 Extraction of motion,.,,, 4,,, 3., 1, 2. 2.,. CHLAC,. 2.1,. (256 ).,., CHLAC. CHLAC, HLAC. 2.3 (HLAC ) r,.,. HLAC. N. 2 HLAC Fig. 2

10-渡部芳栄.indd

n 2 n (Dynamic Programming : DP) (Genetic Algorithm : GA) 2 i

<8ED089EF8B D312D30914F95742E696E6464>

Elmore & Pohlmann Greenwood & Ramagli a b c a b c

172309_XP_天理大学学報第227輯(体育編)

01ⅢⅣⅤⅥⅦⅧⅨⅩ一二三四五六七八九零壱弐02ⅢⅣⅤⅥⅦⅧⅨⅩ一二三四五六七八九零壱弐03ⅢⅣⅤⅥⅦⅧⅨⅩ一二三四五六七八九零壱弐04ⅢⅣⅤⅥⅦⅧⅨⅩ一二三四五六七八九零壱弐05ⅢⅣⅤⅥⅦⅧⅨⅩ一二三四五六七八九零壱弐06ⅢⅣⅤⅥⅦⅧⅨⅩ一二三四五六

& Vol.5 No (Oct. 2015) TV 1,2,a) , Augmented TV TV AR Augmented Reality 3DCG TV Estimation of TV Screen Position and Ro

Ł\1,4.ai

1 4 4 [3] SNS 5 SNS , ,000 [2] c 2013 Information Processing Society of Japan

阿部Doc

学位研究17号

Web Stamps 96 KJ Stamps Web Vol 8, No 1, 2004

Juntendo Medical Journal

鹿大広報149号

8-1.indb

A Feasibility Study of Direct-Mapping-Type Parallel Processing Method to Solve Linear Equations in Load Flow Calculations Hiroaki Inayoshi, Non-member

2

49148


<95DB8C9288E397C389C88A E696E6462>

Abstract Gale-Shapley 2 (1) 2 (2) (1)

untitled


tnbp59-21_Web:P2/ky132379509610002944

JOURNAL OF THE JAPANESE ASSOCIATION FOR PETROLEUM TECHNOLOGY VOL. 66, NO. 6 (Nov., 2001) (Received August 10, 2001; accepted November 9, 2001) Alterna

2017 (413812)

soturon.dvi

29 jjencode JavaScript

untitled

Core Ethics Vol. : - : : : -

Core Ethics Vol.

Core Ethics Vol. -

日本内科学会雑誌第98巻第4号

日本内科学会雑誌第97巻第7号


橡最終原稿.PDF

ÿþ


202


The Journal of the Japan Academy of Nursing Administration and Policies Vol 7, No 2, pp 19 _ 30, 2004 Survey on Counseling Services Performed by Nursi

06’ÓŠ¹/ŒØŒì


When creating an interactive case scenario of a problem that may occur in the educational field, it becomes especially difficult to assume a clear obj



( ) ( ) (action chain) (Langacker 1991) ( 1993: 46) (x y ) x y LCS (2) [x ACT-ON y] CAUSE [BECOME [y BE BROKEN]] (1999: 215) (1) (1) (3) a. * b. * (4)


ISSN NII Technical Report Patent application and industry-university cooperation: Analysis of joint applications for patent in the Universit

:

untitled

ICT Web Web ICT Web 2. 新 学 習 指 導 要 領 の 理 念 と 教 育 の 情 報 化 の 意 義 2-1 新 学 習 指 導 要 領 の 理 念 ICT 2

Hohenegger & Schär, a cm b Kitoh et. al., Gigerenzer et. al. Susan et. al.


23 The Study of support narrowing down goods on electronic commerce sites


untitled

蝨ー蝓溯・豐サ縺ィ繧ウ繝溘Η繝九ユ繧」蠖「謌舌↓髢「縺吶k螳滓・隱ソ譟サ・域擲莠ャ迚茨シ峨€仙悸邵ョ縺ェ縺励€・indd

Bulletin of JSSAC(2014) Vol. 20, No. 2, pp (Received 2013/11/27 Revised 2014/3/27 Accepted 2014/5/26) It is known that some of number puzzles ca

19 Systematization of Problem Solving Strategy in High School Mathematics for Improving Metacognitive Ability

Table 1. Reluctance equalization design. Fig. 2. Voltage vector of LSynRM. Fig. 4. Analytical model. Table 2. Specifications of analytical models. Fig


,,,,., C Java,,.,,.,., ,,.,, i

02 比較教育社会学.indd

1 1 tf-idf tf-idf i

kiyo5_1-masuzawa.indd

FUJII, M. and KOSAKA, M. 2. J J [7] Fig. 1 J Fig. 2: Motivation and Skill improvement Model of J Orchestra Fig. 1: Motivating factors for a

_念3)医療2009_夏.indd

:. SPSS

SNS ( ) SNS(Social Networking Service) SNS SNS i

Kansai University of Welfare Sciences Practical research on the effectiveness of the validation for the elderly with dementia Naoko Tsumura, Tomoko Mi

ユーザーズマニュアル

Transcription:

Vol.2, No.x, April 2015, pp.xx-xx ISSN xxxx-xxxx 2015 4 30 2015 5 25 253-8550 1100 Tel 0467-53-2111( ) Fax 0467-54-3734 http://www.bunkyo.ac.jp/faculty/business/

1 [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 9, 10, 12, 15] The Boston Public Schools system, BPS (Deferred Acceptance system, DA) (Top Trading Cycles system, TTC) cf. [13] [1] cf. [7, 14, 15, 11] cf. [13, 7] 3 BPS DA TTC cf. [13] TTC DA cf. [14] 3 DA TTC DA DA (DA) cf. [13] DA cf. [13] DA (cf. [13]) 2

3 4 BPS, DA, TTC 3 cf. [2] 1 3 2 1 1 2 1 1 GPA GPA 1 3 1 [9] 1 1 cf. [13] GPA 3

TTC cf. [2] cf. [2] DA 2 2.1 n = 204 m = 9 i j x ij = 1 x ij = 0 {0, 1}- b = 25 i j c ij max. s.t. n m c ij x ij (2.1) i=1 j=1 n x ij b j (j = 1,, m) (2.2) i=1 m x ij = 1 (i = 1,, n) (2.3) j=1 x ij {0, 1} (i = 1,, n, j = 1,, m) (2.4) (2.4) {0, 1}- (2.2) (2.3) (2.1) (2.2) (2.4) max. m c ij x ij ( i {1, 2,, n}) (2.5) j=1 1 (2.1) (2.5) cf. [6] 4

[8, 9] 3 45 17 200 17 9 17 1 2 2 1 2 100 9 2 10 204 9 3 1 3 1 100 2 60 3 30 4 9-999 cf. [2] [ 1 2 ] = 40 > 30 = [ 2 3 ] 9 3 3 3 2 3 10 2.1 25 1.1 cf. [2, 3] 2.1: 10 \ 1 2 3 1 33.9 30.8 31.6 96.3 2 29.0 30.4 28.2 87.5 3 33.5 29.7 23.8 87.0 4 20.5 20.2 23.2 63.8 5 22.0 22.5 22.5 67.0 6 20.5 22.9 21.8 65.3 7 9.0 10.7 13.5 33.2 8 9.5 10.8 14.4 34.7 9 11.4 11.7 11.5 34.6 5

Excel python2.7 gurobi5.6.3 32bit CPU Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 [2.93GHz] 4GB 1 2.2 2.2 10 1 3 9 1 3 4 6 7 9 2.2: 1 3 10 25 d1 d2 d3 d4 d5 d6 d7 d8 d9 d10 94.3 92.5 95.0 93.3 90.7 93.7 93.7 93.8 93.5 93.5 93.4 1 175 171 182 170 165 175 172 177 174 173 173.4 2 29 26 17 34 28 25 32 21 26 28 26.6 3 0 7 5 0 11 4 0 6 4 3 4.0 204 204 204 204 204 204 204 204 204 204 1 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25.0 2 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25.0 3 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25.0 4 25 25 25 21 25 25 22 25 25 25 24.3 5 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25.0 6 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25.0 7 11 15 16 24 18 19 17 15 19 15 16.9 8 21 21 20 13 17 15 17 16 15 22 17.7 9 22 18 18 21 19 20 23 23 20 17 20.1 204 204 204 204 204 204 204 204 204 204 2.2 8 1 1 2 3 4 0 9 3 1.1 1 1 1 2.3, 2.4 10 24 3 26 2 7 9 6

2.3: 1 3 10 24 d1 d2 d3 d4 d5 d6 d7 d8 d9 d10 93.2 91.0 93.5 92.4 89.4 92.3 92.8 92.3 92.1 92.1 92.1 1 171 167 177 166 161 170 169 170 169 168 168.8 2 31 25 19 37 28 27 33 27 28 30 28.5 3 2 12 8 1 15 7 2 7 7 6 6.7 204 204 204 204 204 204 204 204 204 204 1 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24.0 2 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24.0 3 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24.0 4 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24.0 5 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24.0 6 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24.0 7 13 20 19 24 19 19 19 19 23 18 19.3 8 24 22 20 14 19 23 17 17 17 23 19.6 9 23 18 21 22 22 18 24 24 20 19 21.1 204 204 204 204 204 204 204 204 204 204 2.4: 1 3 10 26 d1 d2 d3 d4 d5 d6 d7 d8 d9 d10 95.1 94.0 96.3 94.1 92.1 95.1 94.3 95.1 94.9 94.9 94.6 1 179 175 185 174 168 179 175 180 178 178 177.1 2 25 27 19 30 30 25 29 23 26 26 26.0 3 0 2 0 0 6 0 0 1 0 0 0.9 204 204 204 204 204 204 204 204 204 204 1 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26.0 2 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26.0 3 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26.0 4 24 26 26 23 26 26 19 26 26 26 24.8 5 23 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 25.7 6 26 26 26 24 26 26 26 26 26 26 25.8 7 10 16 15 22 15 19 16 12 20 13 15.8 8 24 18 19 13 17 13 16 14 10 19 16.3 9 19 14 14 18 16 16 23 22 18 16 17.6 204 204 204 204 204 204 204 204 204 204 25 7

2.3 1 GPA GPA 2 1 N(2, 1) 10 GPA 2015 4 2 4 GPA 2 1.98, 0.68) 3 (1.88, 0.67 4 (1.87, 0.68 2.1 GPA 0.2 2.1: GPA 0.2 GPA 2 1 1 3 1 1 100 GPA GPA 2.67 1 102.67 1 100 100 104 1 [9] 2 A, B GPA 3 2 1 GPA 1 2 3 A 103 63 33 B 102 62 32 8

(2.1) (A 1, B 2 )103 + 62 = 102 + 63(B 1, A 2 ) 1 1 1 2 3 A 103 60 30 B 102 60 30 (A 1, B 2 )103 + 60 > 102 + 60(B 1, A 2 ) A 1 2 1 3 2 GP A, 1.5 GP A, 1 GP A 1 2 3 A 106.0 64.5 33.0 B 104.0 63.0 32.0 (A 1, B 2 )106.0 + 63.0 > 104.0 + 64.5(B 1, A 2 ) A 1 2 2.5, 2.6 204 GPA 10 GPA 1 204 1 3 2.5 4 9(2) 1(1) GPA 4 9(2) 9 2 GPA 1(1) 1 1 1 3 10 16 5% 8% 9

2.5: 1 GPA 4 9(2) 1(1) 9 6(2) 1(1) 11 5(2) 1(1) 5 9(2) 3(1) 1 7(3) 1(1) 23 5(2) 1(1) 11 6(2) 5(1) 25 9(3) 1(1) 12 7(2) 1(1) 6 4(2) 3(1) 40 9(2) 3(1) 16 7(3) 5(1) 40 6(2) 3(1) 22 7(2) 1(1) 7 6(2) 3(1) 52 9(2) 3(1) 50 9(3) 6(2) 95 1(1) 8(3) 31 7(2) 3(1) 21 7(2) 2(1) 57 5(2) 6(1) 59 5(1) 6(2) 106 9(3) 3(1) 47 8(2) 3(1) 29 5(2) 3(1) 62 9(2) 3(1) 86 9(3) 1(1) 127 5(2) 1(1) 53 8(2) 5(1) 46 4(2) 1(1) 77 5(2) 2(1) 111 9(2) 4(1) 142 3(1) 9(3) 92 6(2) 2(1) 48 7(3) 1(1) 79 4(2) 2(1) 147 2(2) 3(1) 148 1(1) 5(2) 113 2(1) 7(2) 63 3(1) 6(2) 95 3(1) 8(2) 149 8(3) 5(1) 149 6(2) 1(1) 117 3(1) 7(2) 86 2(1) 9(2) 151 2(1) 5(2) 154 4(1) 7(2) 189 1(1) 6(2) 120 1(1) 4(2) 125 1(1) 6(2) 153 1(1) 4(2) 159 1(1) 7(3) 198 1(1) 6(2) 156 3(1) 4(2) 133 3(1) 5(2) 154 3(1) 5(2) 160 1(1) 2(2) 201 3(1) 5(2) 157 5(1) 4(2) 144 1(1) 9(3) 155 2(1) 8(2) 182 5(1) 8(3) 158 3(1) 4(2) 157 6(2) 8(3) 165 3(1) 9(2) 189 5(1) 7(3) 187 6(2) 3(1) 168 3(1) 4(2) 183 1(1) 5(2) 196 3(1) 8(3) 196 3(1) 6(2) 196 1(1) 4(2) 197 6(1) 8(2) 203 1(1) 6(2) 7 7(3) 2(1) 4 7(2) 2(1) 4 8(3) 3(1) 13 8(3) 2(1) 1 6(2) 1(1) 15 4(2) 2(1) 6 8(2) 3(1) 12 6(2) 3(1) 14 8(3) 3(1) 13 9(2) 2(1) 16 7(2) 3(1) 22 5(2) 3(1) 19 7(2) 1(1) 50 9(2) 1(1) 50 8(2) 5(1) 27 7(2) 5(1) 72 9(2) 1(1) 34 6(2) 3(1) 62 8(2) 4(1) 58 9(2) 4(1) 42 9(3) 2(1) 77 9(2) 1(1) 46 9(2) 1(1) 66 1(1) 7(2) 87 9(2) 2(1) 45 7(2) 5(1) 88 9(2) 1(1) 64 5(2) 2(1) 71 8(2) 4(1) 92 5(1) 8(2) 62 5(1) 7(2) 113 1(1) 9(2) 86 3(1) 5(2) 72 5(2) 3(1) 95 4(1) 8(2) 65 2(1) 8(3) 127 2(1) 9(2) 123 1(1) 9(2) 84 9(2) 4(1) 132 1(1) 6(2) 86 9(3) 1(1) 130 1(1) 9(2) 128 4(2) 2(1) 112 4(1) 8(2) 159 2(1) 7(2) 118 4(2) 1(1) 132 1(1) 9(2) 141 3(1) 6(2) 113 4(1) 7(2) 182 2(1) 7(2) 139 1(1) 4(2) 143 1(1) 9(2) 150 2(1) 9(3) 125 5(2) 2(1) 150 2(1) 4(2) 158 6(2) 1(1) 151 3(1) 4(2) 128 2(1) 5(2) 169 3(1) 7(2) 172 3(1) 5(2) 171 1(1) 9(2) 144 4(1) 9(2) 175 2(1) 8(3) 202 3(1) 6(2) 197 2(1) 6(2) 167 3(1) 7(3) 195 1(1) 8(3) 186 3(1) 5(2) 202 5(1) 8(2) 197 2(1) 9(3) 1 2.5 2 2.6 10 3 d3, d6, d10 2 2 3 1 10

2.6: 1 3 GPA 4 9(2) 1(1) 9 6(2) 1(1) 11 5(2) 1(1) 5 9(2) 3(1) 1 7(3) 1(1) 23 5(2) 1(1) 11 6(2) 5(1) 25 9(3) 1(1) 12 7(2) 1(1) 6 4(2) 3(1) 40 9(2) 3(1) 16 7(3) 5(1) 40 6(2) 3(1) 22 7(2) 1(1) 7 6(2) 3(1) 52 9(2) 3(1) 50 9(3) 6(2) 68 9(3) 1(1) 31 7(2) 3(1) 21 7(2) 2(1) 57 5(2) 6(1) 59 5(1) 6(2) 95 1(1) 8(3) 47 8(2) 3(1) 29 5(2) 3(1) 62 9(2) 3(1) 86 9(3) 1(1) 106 9(3) 3(1) 53 8(2) 5(1) 46 4(2) 1(1) 77 5(2) 2(1) 111 9(2) 4(1) 139 3(1) 9(3) 92 6(2) 2(1) 48 7(3) 1(1) 79 4(2) 2(1) 147 2(2) 3(1) 142 3(1) 9(3) 113 2(1) 7(2) 63 3(1) 6(2) 95 3(1) 8(2) 149 8(3) 5(1) 148 1(1) 5(2) 117 3(1) 7(2) 86 2(1) 9(2) 151 2(1) 5(2) 154 4(1) 7(2) 149 6(2) 1(1) 120 1(1) 4(2) 125 1(1) 6(2) 153 1(1) 4(2) 159 1(1) 7(3) 189 1(1) 6(2) 156 3(1) 4(2) 133 3(1) 5(2) 154 3(1) 5(2) 160 1(1) 2(2) 198 1(1) 6(2) 157 5(1) 4(2) 144 1(1) 9(3) 155 2(1) 8(2) 182 5(1) 8(3) 158 3(1) 4(2) 157 6(2) 8(3) 165 3(1) 9(2) 189 5(1) 7(3) 187 6(2) 3(1) 168 3(1) 4(2) 183 1(1) 5(2) 196 3(1) 8(3) 196 3(1) 6(2) 196 1(1) 4(2) 197 6(1) 8(2) 203 1(1) 6(2) 7 7(3) 2(1) 4 7(2) 2(1) 4 8(3) 3(1) 13 8(3) 2(1) 1 6(2) 1(1) 15 4(2) 2(1) 6 8(2) 3(1) 12 6(2) 3(1) 14 8(3) 3(1) 13 9(2) 2(1) 16 7(2) 3(1) 22 5(2) 3(1) 19 7(2) 1(1) 50 9(2) 1(1) 50 8(2) 5(1) 19 2(1) 4(2) 72 9(2) 1(1) 34 6(2) 3(1) 62 8(2) 4(1) 58 9(2) 4(1) 27 7(2) 5(1) 77 9(2) 1(1) 46 9(2) 1(1) 66 1(1) 7(2) 87 9(2) 2(1) 42 9(3) 2(1) 88 9(2) 1(1) 64 5(2) 2(1) 71 8(2) 4(1) 92 5(1) 8(2) 45 7(2) 5(1) 113 1(1) 9(2) 86 3(1) 5(2) 72 5(2) 3(1) 95 4(1) 8(2) 62 5(1) 7(2) 127 2(1) 9(2) 123 1(1) 9(2) 84 9(2) 4(1) 117 1(1) 6(2) 86 9(3) 1(1) 130 1(1) 9(2) 128 4(2) 2(1) 112 4(1) 8(2) 132 1(1) 6(2) 118 4(2) 1(1) 132 1(1) 9(2) 141 3(1) 6(2) 113 4(1) 7(2) 156 7(3) 1(1) 145 1(1) 9(3) 143 1(1) 9(2) 150 2(1) 9(3) 125 5(2) 2(1) 159 2(1) 7(2) 150 2(1) 4(2) 158 6(2) 1(1) 151 3(1) 4(2) 128 2(1) 5(2) 182 2(1) 7(2) 169 3(1) 7(2) 172 3(1) 5(2) 171 1(1) 9(2) 144 4(1) 9(2) 199 3(1) 9(3) 175 2(1) 8(3) 202 3(1) 6(2) 197 2(1) 6(2) 167 3(1) 7(3) 203 6(2) 3(1) 195 1(1) 8(3) 186 3(1) 5(2) 202 5(1) 8(2) 197 2(1) 9(3) 1 2 2 1 1 1 11

GPA 1 2 1 3 2.2 2.4 10 2040 204 10 GPA 4 0 GPA 1,2,3 1 2 3 2.2: 2.2 25 1.1 85% 1 13% 2 3 2.2 2.3,2.4 2.3 2.4 1 1 3 2.5, 2.6 12

2.3: 1 GPA 2.4: 1 3 GPA 2.4 DA GPA 13

A, B GPA α, β, δ, γ GPA 1 2 3 A 3.0 δ β α 106.0 64.5 33.0 B 2.0 β γ α 104.0 63.0 32.0 (A, α), (B, β) (A, β) A, B α, β (A, α), (B, β) (A, β), (B, α) 33.0 + 104.0 = 137.0 > 96.5 = 64.5 + 32.0 A 3 α 2 β 1 2 GPA 1 2 3 A 3.0 β( ) δ( ) α 106.0 64.5 33.0 B 2.0 β γ α 104.0 63.0 32.0 A (A, α), (B, β) (A, β), (B, α) 33.0 + 104.0 = 137.0 < 138.0 = 106.0 + 32.0 A 1,2,3 100,60,30 GPA 1 2 3 A a G δ β α a 1 a 2 a 3 B b G β γ α b 1 b 2 b 3 14

A,B a 1,, a 3, b 1,, b 3 GPA a 1 > b 1 > a 2 > b 2 > a 3 > b 3 (A, α), (B, β) (A, β), (B, α) a 3 + b 1 > a 2 + b 3 a 1 = b 1 > a 2 = b 2 > a 3 = b 3 A GPA 1 2 3 A a G β( ) δ( ) α ā 1 ā 2 a 3 B b G β γ α b 1 b 2 b 3 ā 1 > b 1 > ā 2 > b 2 > a 3 > b 3 ā 1 b 1 > a 3 b 3 A (A, α), (B, β) (A, β), (B, α) a 3 + b 1 < ā 1 + b 3 A 1 2 ā 1 = b 1 > ā 2 = b 2 > a 3 = b 3 DA yes DA DA 1.1 2 3 1 3 1 15

DA 4 GPA 2.7, 2.8 2.7: DA 1 d1 d2 d3 d4 d5 d6 d7 d8 d9 d10 1 171 164 177 165 151 171 166 166 166 166 166.3 2 18 15 7 20 29 14 16 26 18 13 17.6 3 6 14 9 9 7 8 13 3 9 7 8.5 4 5 5 4 5 11 7 5 6 6 7 6.1 5 4 4 5 3 4 3 3 2 3 8 3.9 6 0 2 0 2 1 1 1 1 2 2 1.2 7 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0.4 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 204 204 204 204 204 204 204 204 204 204 4 9 9 11 11 10 17 11 9 9 11 18 11.6 2.8: DA 2 25 d1 d2 d3 d4 d5 d6 d7 d8 d9 d10 1 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25.0 2 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25.0 3 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25.0 4 25 25 25 25 25 25 21 25 25 25 24.6 5 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25.0 6 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25.0 7 12 15 12 25 17 19 18 16 17 19 17.0 8 24 22 21 9 17 19 16 16 18 18 18.0 9 18 17 21 20 20 16 24 22 19 17 19.4 204 204 204 204 204 204 204 204 204 204 2.7 10 1 9 1 9 2 4 9 d1 1 171 2 18 3 6 4 5 5 4 6 9 0 4 5 9 7 d3 d5 d10 11.6 4 7 204 3 16

2.2 2.8 1 9 3 1,2,3 3 4,5,6 6 d7 4 2.2 6 d4,d7 4 1 3 DA [4] DA 4 4 3 1.1 [9] A, B GPA α, β, δ, γ, ϵ GPA 1 2 3 A 3.0 α β γ 106.0 64.5 33.0 B 2.0 α δ ϵ 104.0 63.0 32.0 2 1 α 2 3 25 A,B 24 α 1 A,B 1 A 2 β A B 2 δ B 1 B δ (A, α), (B, ϵ) (A, β), (B, α) 2 1 2 (A, α), (B, ϵ) (A, β), (B, α) 106.0 + 32.0 = 138.0 < 168.5 = 64.5 + 104.0 17

2 1 2 A,B A 1 B 1 1 3 2 DA [17, 16, 18] DA 3 3 GPA 18

[1] D. Gale and L.S. Shapley, College admissions and the stability of marriage, American Mathematical Monthly, Vol.69 (1962) 9-15. [2] (1997). [3], :, 36 (1991) 85-89. [4], :, TORSJ Vol.51 (2008) 71-93. [5], :. OR 2005, (2005), 98 99. [6] (2000). [7] :, 14.2 (2002) 779-830. [8] :, 35 (2006) 367-378. [9] :, 44 (2011) 59-73. [10] :, (2013). [11] :, RAMP 25 (2013) 30-45. [12] :, (2010) 229-238. [13] NTT (2010). [14] :, RAMP 25 (2013) 1-16. [15] :, RAMP 25 (2013) 17-29. [16] Canadian Resident Matching Service, http://www.carms.ca/. [17] National Resident Matching Program, http://www.nrmp.org/. [18], http://www.jrmp.jp/. 19

The use of an optimization technique to solve student sectioning problems Keisuke Hotta Faculty of Business Administration, Bunkyo University khotta@shonan.bunkyo.ac.jp Recieved: 30 April 2015 / Accepted: 25 May 2015 Abstract The focus of this study is to examine typical student sectioning problems. All students have their preferences to each section. The goal is to make an assignment decision to comply with their wishes as much as possible. To solve this problem, various approaches and algorithms have been proposed and discussed. In the field of mechanism design, both the deferred acceptance system and the top trading cycles system are considered to be a good method. It is studied well whether a solution provided by each method has desirable properties such as Pareto optimality, stability and strategy-proofness. In contrast, approaches using an optimization model are also studied. Studies of the model mainly focus on how to express student preferences in order to get a desirable solution. This study shows that the optimization approach is superior to the deferred acceptance to deal with some problems of student sectioning at a university. In addition, this research will clarify whether the solution by the optimization model has the desirable properties such as stability and strategy-proofness. Keyword: student sectioning problem, optimization, Boston public schools system, deferred acceptance system, top trading cycles system, Gale-Shapley algorithm, mechanism design, Pareto optimality, stability, strategy-proofness Faculty of Business Administration, Bunkyo University 1100 Namegaya, Chigasaki, Kanagawa 253-8550, JAPAN Tel +81-467-53-2111, Fax +81-467-54-3734 http://www.bunkyo.ac.jp/faculty/business 20