Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org) Title 大学野球における配球について : カウント0-0における投球の分析 (2) Sub Title The study of combination of pitches in college baseball (2) Author 菊地, 啓太 (Kikuchi, Keita) 中島, 宣行 (Nakajima, Nobuyuki) 綿田, 博人 (Watada, Hirohito) Publisher 慶應義塾大学体育研究所 Publication year 2011 Jtitle 体育研究所紀要 (Bulletin of the institute of physical education, Keio university). Vol.50, No.1 (2011. 1),p.41-51 Abstract The purpose of this study was to analyze the combination of pitches in college baseball games. The subjects were 2056 pitches that it was thrown a ball in a case of count 0-0 with the righthanded pitcher vs. the left-handed hitter except the case that hitters attempted to bunt in 73 games performed in a season of autumn, 2008 and spring, 2009 of Tokyo Big 6 Baseball League. We used the chart to record the type of pitch, location, and result of pitch, moreover, we recorded the process seeing or swinging or the foul ball when the pitchers threw strikes. The results were summarized as follows: 1) Of the pitches, 53.4% were four-seam fastballs and 23.1%, sliders. The pitchers delivered pitches such as a four-seam fastball and a slider with the ball that had a good control, and they attempted to deliver to the outside course or the low course intentionally. 2) The pitchers should throw a strike in advance, because the probability that the hitters had made mistake in batting was considerably high. 3) It was suggested that the hitters preparing for a four-seam fastball basically. Regarding, the course, it was suggested the hitters expecting for the course of center and middle, inside and middle. In addition, the hitters selected from a type of pitch and the course that swung. 4) A curve and a slider were particularly effective to throw the strike by seeing. A four-seam fastball and a two-seam fastball were effective to throw the strike by the foul ball. A splitter and a change of pace were especially effective to throw the strike by swinging. 5) Delivering to the course of inside and low, outside and low, and inside and middle was effective to throw the strike by seeing. Delivering to the course of inside and low as well as outside and low was especially effective to throw the strike by swinging. Delivering to the course of inside and high was particularly effective to throw the strike by the foul ball. Notes Genre Departmental Bulletin Paper URL http://koara.lib.keio.ac.jp/xoonips/modules/xoonips/detail.php?koara_id=an00135710-00500001 -0041
The Study of Combination of Pitches in College Baseball Keita Kikuchi 1), Nobuyuki Nakajima 2), Hirohito Watada 3) The purpose of this study was to analyze the combination of pitches in college baseball games. The subjects were 2056 pitches that it was thrown a ball in a case of count 0-0 with the right-handed pitcher vs. the left-handed hitter except the case that hitters attempted to bunt in 73 games performed in a season of autumn, 2008 and spring, 2009 of Tokyo Big 6 Baseball League. We used the chart to record the type of pitch, location, and result of pitch, moreover, we recorded the process seeing or swinging or the foul ball when the pitchers threw strikes. The results were summarized as follows: 1) Of the pitches, 53.4% were four-seam fastballs and 23.1%, sliders. The pitchers delivered pitches such as a four-seam fastball and a slider with the ball that had a good control, and they attempted to deliver to the outside course or the low course intentionally. 2) The pitchers should throw a strike in advance, because the probability that the hitters had made mistake in batting was considerably high. 3) It was suggested that the hitters preparing for a four-seam fastball basically. Regarding, the course, it was suggested the hitters expecting for the course of center and middle, inside and middle. In addition, the hitters selected from a type of pitch and the course that swung. 4) A curve and a slider were particularly effective to throw the strike by seeing. A four-seam fastball and a two-seam fastball were effective to throw the strike by the foul ball. A splitter and a change of pace were especially effective to throw the strike by swinging. 5) Delivering to the course of inside and low, outside and low, and inside and middle was effective to throw the strike by seeing. Delivering to the course of inside and low as well as outside and low was especially effective to throw the strike by swinging. Delivering to the course of inside and high was particularly effective to throw the strike by the foul ball. 1 1997 1 2 3 41
140 20061999 2010 0 0 2010 5528 2849 2679 2228 2280 2010 2 2010 0 0 2008 2009 73 2 2 1 3 2 2006 2006 2 1 2 42
1 0 0 254 85 22 113 335 445 0 1 164 47 13 69 287 421 0 2 39 8 3 14 205 359 0 3 2 1 0 1 500 500 1 0 168 61 12 76 363 452 1 1 207 71 12 85 343 411 1 2 108 39 7 53 361 491 1 3 51 16 1 17 314 333 2 0 140 19 3 23 136 164 2 1 348 52 7 63 149 181 2 2 282 56 11 72 199 255 2 3 170 27 4 34 159 200 1933 482 95 620 249 321 2 656 132 22 162 201 247 743 212 45 270 285 363 534 138 28 188 258 352 3 2 5 3 3 3 3 9 1 1 0 0 2006 0 0 3 3 1 2008 2009 73 5528 2280 0 0 2056 1 3 3 2005 4 43
2 3 3 1 2056 6 3 3 2 3 3 3 2 932 4 4 1 53 4 8 1 23 1 10 8 4 6 2 18 9 14 3 14 7 47 9 3 15 7 11 6 18 9 3 46 2 2010 30 3 23 1 6 7 10 8 4 6 7 15 7 4 35 9 43 3 45 3 2006 0 0 1 0 0 335 44
SL 23.1% FK/CP 10.8% CB 8.1% TS 4.6% 2 FB 53.4% 3 6 7 538 13 8 OM 14.3% 安打 3.6% ファウル 9.4% OL 18.9% OH 14.7% ボール 43.3% IH 4.1% CL 11.6% IM 6.6% 3 アウト 6.8% その他 0.9% 4 CM 7.3% IL 15.7% CH 6.7% ストライク 35.9% 4 2 4 2 1 5 73 8 2056 43 3 30 5 26 2 4 2 2 2 8 69 334 01 6 7 5 61 7 45
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 全体 (n=2056) 43.3% 30.5% 26.2% FB(n=1097) 41.6% 28.2% 30.3% TS 6.7% CB(n=167) 44.9% 42.5% 12.6% FK/CP 13.0% SL(n=475) 46.3% 37.1% 16.6% FK/CP(n=223) TS(n=94) 38.3% 46.6% 22.0% 31.4% 23.4% 38.3% スイングなし ( ボール ) スイングなし ( ストライク ) スイング SL 14.7% CB 3.9% FB 61.7% 5 6 6 2005 4 2008 2010 7 28 6 2004 1997 44 3 20 0 28 6 4 3 2010 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 全体 (n=538) 20.8% 35.9% 13.8% 26.0% 3.5% FB(n=332) 16.3% 41.6% 14.8% 23.8% 3.6% CB(n=21) 14.3% 19.0% 28.6% 30.1% 0.0% SL(n=79) 22.8% 30.1% 11.4% 30.4% 5.1% FK/CP(n=70) TS(n=36) 16.7% 44.3% 36.1% 20.0% 19.4% 4.3% 28.6% 25.0% 2.9% 2.8% 7 空振ファウル安打アウトその他 46
1997 1997 1997 4 2 3 16 444 737 01 2 8 9 58 9 2010 2010 13 3 34 3 30 8 34 1 42 8 13 9 3 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 全体 (n=2056) 43.3% 30.5% 26.2% IH(n=85) 49.4% 16.5% 34.1% IM(n=135) 13.3% 48.9% 37.8% IL(n=323) 62.2% 22.9% 14.9% CH(n=138) 0.0% CM(n=151) 39.1% 41.1% 18.1% 58.9% 42.8% CL(n=238) 42.0% 30.3% 27.7% OH(n=302) 73.2% 12.9% 13.9% OM(n=295) 23.7% 44.4% 31.9% OL(n=389) 47.6% 37.0% 15.4% スイングなし ( ボール ) スイングなし ( ストライク ) スイング 8 47
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 全体 (n=2056) 20.8% 35.9% 13.8% 26.0% 3.5% IH(n=85) 6.9% 58.6% 13.8% 13.8% 6.9% IM(n=135) 5.9% 41.2% 21.6% 29.4% 2.0% IL(n=323) 35.4% 22.9% 6.3% 22.9% 12.5% CH(n=138) 16.9% 37.3% 11.9% 32.2% 1.7% CM(n=151) 4.5% 38.2% 19.1% 32.6% 5.6% CL(n=238) 27.3% 19.7% 18.2% 34.8% 0.0% OH(n=302) 28.6% 40.5% 9.5% 21.4% 0.0% OM(n=295) 20.2% 42.6% 16.0% 19.1% 2.1% OL(n=389) 45.0% 30.0% 1.7% 20.0% 3.3% 空振ファウル安打アウトその他 9 31 9 4 3 4 3 1 10 11 67 3 10 1 11 1 1 1 0 0 1 48
4 3 2 8 95 505 01 2 10 2006 0 0 1997 61 7 2008 1 27 5 7 41 6 4 3 3 16 2 86 367 01 11 42 4 51 5 2005 38 6 17 5 57 4 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 全体 (n=932) 67.3% 12.0% 20.7% FB(n=501) 61.7% 10.8% 27.5% 3.8% CB(n=78) 91.0% 5.1% SL(n=218) 80.7% 8.3% 11.0% FK/CP(n=94) 52.1% 33.0% 14.9% TS(n=41) 53.7% 14.6% 31.7% 見送り空振ファウル 10 49
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 全体 (n=932) 67.3% 12.0% 20.7% IH(n=33) 42.4% 6.1% 51.5% 3.3% IM(n=90) 73.3% 23.3% IL(n=102) 72.5% 16.7% 10.8% CH(n=57) 43.9% 17.5% 38.6% 4.0% CM(n=100) 62.0% 34.0% CL(n=103) 69.9% 17.5% 12.6% OH(n=68) 57.4% 17.6% 25.0% OM(n=190) 68.9% 10.0% 21.1% OL(n=189) 76.2% 14.3% 9.5% 11 見送り空振ファウル 17 6 9 21 5 62 0 70 1 70 9 2 50
5 0 0 2 0 0 335 2006 51 1 37 39 2004 26 15 21 2010 0 0 49 1 15 25 1997 9 24 2006 114 117 2005 35 45 1999 44 3 119 124 2008 37 4 51