51 206 51 63 2007 GIS 51 1 60 52 2 60 1 52 3 61 2 52 61 3 58 61 4 58 Summary 63 60 20022005 2004 40km 7,10025 2002 2005 19 3 19 GIS 2005GIS 2006 2002 2004 GIS
52 2062007 1 2004 GIS Fig.1 GIS ESRIArcView a ArcView Table 1 ArcView mxdvba ArcView Fig.2 MakeNewPoint MakePipeKind MakeFacility MakeConstruct MakeChartRef MakePipeSegment PDF CAD ArcView GIS GIS 2006 ( 2500() 25000() PDF 200000() Fig.1 Structure of the system
GIS 53 Table 1 List of agricultural pipe line data in the system 10m.tif () 2500 2,500 2500 2500 2500 1 2500 2500 road road 2500 gaiku gaiku 2500 mizu mi zu 2500 tatemono ta te mo no 25000 25,000 () 200000 200,000 () Fig.2 Programs to produce data automatically Fig.3 X GISFig.4 25,000 Fig.3 Specification control drawing 20,000,2,500ArcView Fig.5
54 2062007 Fig.6 GIS Table 3 Layer of points Fig.4 GIS Convert into coordinate on GIS NAME m m GIS m Fig.5 Choice of maps by display scale TPm GIS Table 2 1 MakeNewPoint Table 2 Index of line date Fig.6 Produce of points layer NAME Table 3 Fig.7 Add of distance date
GIS 55 Fig.7 Fig.8 Table 5 Fig.10GIS 2 2 GIS Table 5 Layer of facility Fig.8 Display of distance Table 4 GIS Fig.9 TPm m Table 4 Layer of pipe kind MakeFacilit y mm Fig.10 Produce of facility layer MakePipeKind Fig.9 Produce of pipe kind Table 6 Fig.11GIS
56 2062007 Table 6 Layer of construction Table 7 Layer of figure MakeChartRef Fig.12 Produce of figure layer MakeConstruct Fig.11 Produce of construction layer Table 7 Fig.12 Fig.13 AcrobatReader Fig.14 Fig.13 Display of longitudinal profile of each pipe line 20052004 10m 10m Fig.15
GIS 57 Table 8 Layer of water pressure TPm m Fig.14 Display of specification control drawing MakePipeSegment Fig.16 Produce of water pressure layer Fig.15 Produce of short range of pipe line Table 8 Fig.16 Fig.17 1998 10.343MPa35m 1100% 20.343MPa 140%0.343MPa Fig.17 Display of distribution of water hammer Fig.18 Fig.18 Display of disign irrigation requirement
58 2062007 b Fig.19 (m 3 /s) Fig.19 Research of facilities with keywords 3 20m GIS Fig.20 21 Fig.22 4 2006 /kmyear Fig.20 Input of water leak accident data Fig.21 Input of check data Fig.22 Storage of pictures at water leak accident and check /km Fig.2324
GIS 59 Fig.23 Ratio of water leak accident Fig.24 Ratio of repair expense of water leak accident 3 Fig.25 Fig.26 1 2 Fig.25 (1997) Sign of degradation (Example of fluid machinery) Fig.26 (2006) Relation of capacity and scan of pipe line system a Fig.27 Fig.28Fig.29 b Table 1 Fig.27 Frequency of accident at each pipeline
60 2062007 Fig.28 Display of number and ratio of accident at each year Fig.30 () Calculation of new evaluation indicator (flow velocity) Fig.29 Display of repair expense at each year 10m 10m Fig.30ArcView Fig.31Fig.3031 LCC Fig.31 () Display of new evaluation indicator (flow velocity) 1 18 9 Fig.32 10 3 1 1-45-1 GIS 2 PC Fig.33
GIS 61 Fig.32 20,000 Index map of test site Fig.33 Instruction of the system 3 GIS GIS GIS 11 2005 56 87-90 12 2005AE,No.239,77-78 13 2002GIS 70(2)33-36
62 2062007 142006GIS 2 GIS, 908-909 152006 508-509 162004 72(5)p13-16 172004 167-13, 18 2004 5552-54 19 2005, 5684-86 10 2002 70(2)31-35 111998 225 12 2006 73(11)15-20 132006, 142006 73(11)3-6 151997704
GIS 63 Construction of History Management System Using GIS for Large-Scale Agricultural Pipe Line INOUE Keisuke, NAKANISHI Norio, NAKAZATO Hiroomi, NAKA Tatsuo Summary A system that supports to determine repair priority of large-scale agricultural pipe line was developed and introduced into a case district. This system operates on Arc View, which is one of GIS soft, and has the database of agricultural pipe line in the district and programs that calculate evaluation indicators and output the results. In this system, the condition of the facility can be known in real time by inputting an accident history date and checked result data of pipe line on a daily basis. And this system can make graph of accident ratio and repair expense changes by years and make arbitrary evaluation indicators from the database for priority decision of function maintenance. This indicator can be displayed on the map of GIS and will be helpful for decision of repair. The manual of this system is prepared in order to propagate at other districts and it is expected that the system will be improved. Keywords :facility management, agricultural facilities, renewal priority, GIS