PowerPoint プレゼンテーション

Similar documents
FIBA In Memoriam

<30315F985F95B65F90B490852E696E6464>

Bull. of Nippon Sport Sci. Univ. 47 (1) Devising musical expression in teaching methods for elementary music An attempt at shared teaching


企業の信頼性を通じたブランド構築に関する考察

Introduction ur company has just started service to cut out sugar chains from protein and supply them to users by utilizing the handling technology of


A Nutritional Study of Anemia in Pregnancy Hematologic Characteristics in Pregnancy (Part 1) Keizo Shiraki, Fumiko Hisaoka Department of Nutrition, Sc

202

論文9.indd

16_.....E...._.I.v2006

Introduction Purpose This training course describes the configuration and session features of the High-performance Embedded Workshop (HEW), a key tool



*Ł\”ƒ‚ä(DCH800)

ユーザーズマニュアル

untitled

2 3

Corrections of the Results of Airborne Monitoring Surveys by MEXT and Ibaraki Prefecture

JOURNAL OF THE JAPANESE ASSOCIATION FOR PETROLEUM TECHNOLOGY VOL. 66, NO. 6 (Nov., 2001) (Received August 10, 2001; accepted November 9, 2001) Alterna


Huawei G6-L22 QSG-V100R001_02

NINJAL Research Papers No.8

JIS Z 9001:1998JIS Z 9002:1998 ISO/IEC 17025ISO/IEC Guide 25


21 Effects of background stimuli by changing speed color matching color stimulus

Vol. 36, Special Issue, S 3 S 18 (2015) PK Phase I Introduction to Pharmacokinetic Analysis Focus on Phase I Study 1 2 Kazuro Ikawa 1 and Jun Tanaka 2

<95DB8C9288E397C389C88A E696E6462>

Visual Evaluation of Polka-dot Patterns Yoojin LEE and Nobuko NARUSE * Granduate School of Bunka Women's University, and * Faculty of Fashion Science,

52-2.indb

IPSJ SIG Technical Report Vol.2016-CE-137 No /12/ e β /α α β β / α A judgment method of difficulty of task for a learner using simple

C FGIH C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C

大学論集第42号本文.indb

第4回 JISSスポーツ科学会議 ポスターセッション

BS・110度CSデジタルハイビジョンチューナー P-TU1000JS取扱説明書


I N S T R U M E N T A T I O N & E L E C T R I C A L E Q U I P M E N T Pressure-resistant gasket type retreat method effective bulk compressibility Fro

_念3)医療2009_夏.indd

YUHO

2 122

On the Wireless Beam of Short Electric Waves. (VII) (A New Electric Wave Projector.) By S. UDA, Member (Tohoku Imperial University.) Abstract. A new e



46

The Japanese Journal of Health Psychology, 29(S): (2017)

.N..

2種の(1→3)-β-D-グルカン測定試薬の真菌に対する反応性の比較

駒田朋子.indd

\615L\625\761\621\745\615\750\617\743\623\6075\614\616\615\606.PS

Core Ethics Vol. a

Web Stamps 96 KJ Stamps Web Vol 8, No 1, 2004

Title 外傷性脊髄損傷患者の泌尿器科学的研究第 3 報 : 上部尿路のレ線学的研究並びに腎機能について Author(s) 伊藤, 順勉 Citation 泌尿器科紀要 (1965), 11(4): Issue Date URL

Tab 5, 11 Tab 4, 10, Tab 3, 9, 15Tab 2, 8, 14 Tab 1, 7, 13 2

1 [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 9, 10, 12, 15] The Boston Public Schools system, BPS (Deferred Acceptance system, DA) (Top Trading Cycles system, TTC) cf. [13] [


     ステイクホルダー理論の展開に関する一考察


国際社会文化研究所紀要 14号☆/目次

p _08森.qxd

LC304_manual.ai


2

日本語教育紀要 7/pdf用 表紙

IM 21B04C50-01

’ÓŠ¹/‰´„û

A5 PDF.pwd

九州大学学術情報リポジトリ Kyushu University Institutional Repository 看護師の勤務体制による睡眠実態についての調査 岩下, 智香九州大学医学部保健学科看護学専攻 出版情報 : 九州大学医学部保健学


process of understanding everyday language is similar, finally as far as word production is concerned, individual variations seem to be greater at an

1..FEM FEM 3. 4.

How to read the marks and remarks used in this parts book. Section 1 : Explanation of Code Use In MRK Column OO : Interchangeable between the new part

ユーザーズマニュアル

2 except for a female subordinate in work. Using personal name with SAN/KUN will make the distance with speech partner closer than using titles. Last


評論・社会科学 101号(P)☆/1.三井


TH-42PAS10 TH-37PAS10 TQBA0286


;y ;y ;; yy ;y;; yy y;y;y;y ;y; ;; yy ; y Portable CD player Operating Instructions RQT5364-S

How to read the marks and remarks used in this parts book. Section 1 : Explanation of Code Use In MRK Column OO : Interchangeable between the new part


Transcription:

Quantitative analysis by LBA (PK/Biomarker) 1

Seiji Mito (Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation) Kousuke Iijima (Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co., Ltd.) Satomi, Sasahara (JCL Bioassay Corporation) Hiroyuki Shimizu (Toray Research Center, Inc.) Masako Soma (Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd.) Fumiaki Meguro (LSI Medience Corporation) Itadaki Yamaguchi (Sumika Chemical Analysis Service, Ltd.) Yoshinobu Yokota (Shin Nippon Biomedical Laboratories, Ltd.) 2

Biotechnology-based drugs, typified by antibody drugs, are currently being developed for various diseases. The ligand binding assay (LBA) is being used for the concentration measurement of these drugs. LBA is also commonly used to measure various biomarkers that serve as indices for drug efficacy and safety evaluations. In this regard, LBA was taken up as one of the topics in a JBF discussion group (DG) starting in 2013. Presentations were held in the fourth and fifth JBF symposium. As to this particular topic, the discussion was held with a focus on the quantitative analysis by LBA (PK/Biomarker). 3

In particular, this DG talked about sample preparations, LBA platforms, surrogate matrices, stability assessments, specificity, reference standards and critical reagents. This presentation gives an overview of contents discussed in the DG to help establish the standard procedures for the quantitative analysis by LBA (PK/Biomarker) and reliability of the assay. 4

May 2014: Member recruitment from DG supporters. 24 Jun 2014: Kick off meeting with 8 members. Jul 2014 - Dec 2014: Monthly teleconferences and e-mail conversations. 20 Aug 2014: F2F meeting collaborated with DG2014-11. Jan 2015: Summarizes and preparation poster presentation. 5

1. Sample preparation 2. LBA platform 3. Surrogate matrix 4. Stability evaluation 5. Specificity 6. Reference standard Critical reagent 6

1.1 Operating and inspecting pipette 1.2 Using low-protein binding tip and tube, and sample additives 7

Back ground Discussion points Operation Do you use both pipetting modes (forward or reverse mode)? How to select the pipetting mode and the volume range Inspection When to perform the test Test volume 8

Back ground Discussion points When to select a low-protein binding tip and tubes Do you use the same tip and tube in actual sample analysis? When to select to use sample additives Do you use the same additives in actual sample analysis? 9

10

Background Discussion points Commonly used Platforms Priority criteria of Platform selection Risk management of using a Platform supported by a single vendor What should be done when a validated assay have to be changed its platform. Will you continue to use an instrument with expired warranty terms? 11

1.1 Selection of a surrogate matrix 1.2 Analytical method validation and stability 12

Back ground Discussion points What is used as a surrogate matrix? How to select the surrogate matrix Risk management of using a surrogate matrix 13

Back ground Discussion points Analytical method validation Stability 14

4-1) Considerations for Validation Study Stability Evaluations 4-2) Importance of ISS 4-3) Stability evaluation for Biosimilar 15

Background Discussion points 4-1) Considerations for Validation Study Stability Evaluations Target-relevant stability samples (PK or biomarkers) Stability conditions and period Stability evaluation method using individual sample Stability evaluation method using SS*-spiked sample Different criteria for PK and biomarkers Handling against incidental criterion non-fulfillment 4-2) Importance of ISS 4-3) Stability Evaluation for Biosimilars *: Standard substance 16

17

Background Discussion points Related substances and selection When do you not perform the specificity? Setting of spiked concentration When a commercial kit is used, Is the specificity necessary? When a related substance exists in a matrix Judgment of necessity for additional specificity testing after a method validation is completed 18

6.1 Stability of purchased reference standard 6.2 Handling of lot changes 6.3 Expiration date of critical reagent 19

Background Discussion points Stability of purchased reference standard Handling of lot changes Reference standard Critical reagent Assay kit Expiration date of critical reagent 20

LBA (PK/Biomarker) 21

22

ligand binding assay (LBA) LBA 2013 JBF (DG) LBA 4 5 JBF LBA PK/Biomarker 23

DG LBA DG LBA PK/Biomarker 24

2014 5 DG 2014 6 24 8 2014 7 2014 12 1 TC 2014 8 20 DG2014-11 F2F 2015 1 25

1. 2. LBA platform 3. 4. 5. 6. 26

1.1 1.2 27

28

LBA 29

1 2 1 2 2 30

Japan Bioanalysis Forum QC 8 31

Japan Bioanalysis Forum QC QC QC QC 揃 32

Japan Bioanalysis Forum + + + 33

34

35

Japan Bioanalysis Forum CMC TK PK PK 36

TK PK PK 37

38

Japan Bioanalysis Forum Platform Platform Single vendor Platform 39

Japan Bioanalysis Forum LBA 40

Immuno PCR SPR TMB, pnpp Luminol, dioxetane Ruthenium Alexa Fluor, Europium DNA SPR Immuno PCR SPR 41

platform PK ELISA ECL ELISA ECL Biomarker ELISA 42

Single vendor LBA platform platform 43

platform 44

PK Biomarker 45

1.1 1.2 46

Japan Bioanalysis Forum 47

Japan Bioanalysis Forum 4.1. 48

Japan Bioanalysis Forum. * * * 49

Japan Bioanalysis Forum 50

Japan Bioanalysis Forum 51

Japan Bioanalysis Forum 52

Japan Bioanalysis Forum. 53

Japan Bioanalysis Forum. n 5. 54

Japan Bioanalysis Forum...... MRD.. 55

Japan Bioanalysis Forum. QC.. ISS Incurred Sample Stability. ISS ISR. 56

4-1) 4-2) ISS 4-3) 57

Japan Bioanalysis Forum 4-1) PK, Biomarker PK Biomarker 4-2) ISS 4-3) 58

Japan Bioanalysis Forum LBA PK * Biomarker fit-for-purpose** PK Biomarker *: ( 0711 1 ) **: Fit-for-Purpose Method Development and Validation for Successful Biomarker Measurement ( AAPS Research paper, 2005 ) 59

/ PK, Biomarker PK LQC* HQC** Extra QC n=3/ Biomarker PK LQC HQC CRO 5 7 PK Biomarker *: Low quality control, within 3 times of LLOQ (lower limit of qualification) **: High quality control, more than one-thirds of ULOQ (upper limit of qualification) 60

/ PK, Biomarker PK Biomarker 4 24 3 5 1 3 6 4 24 PK Biomarker Deep Freezer -80-20 -80 61

1 5-7 7 4 %Initial* 20% *: %Initial = / 100 62

PK LQC, HQC, Extra QC 20% PK Biomarker LQC, HQC, Extra QC LQC, HQC Extra QC / 20% LQC HQC Extra QC* 20% 20% 20% *: BMV Extra QC 8 4 50% 50% 63

PK Biomarker PK 20% Biomarker PK 20% Biomarker 20% 25% Biomarker 64

65

24 4 5 3 LQC, HQC, Extra QC HQC n=3/ 3 LQC Extra QC HQC n=1 n=3 CV 20% 僅 僅 66

1 2 3 2 1,3,6 2 1,3,6 3 HQC 15% 6 3 2 6 15% 20% %Initial 20% 67

PK Biomarker ISS* PK ISR** ISS Biomarker ISS PK ISS *: Incurred sample stability **: Incurred sample reanalysis 68

PK 1 69

70

Japan Bioanalysis Forum 71

Japan Bioanalysis Forum 72

IgG IFN IFN-α β 73

Japan Bioanalysis Forum a. b. COA 74

75

PK 76

77

78

79

6.1 6.2 6.3 80

Japan Bioanalysis Forum 81

Japan Bioanalysis Forum Q&A No.3 Q&A No.25 82

Japan Bioanalysis Forum 83

84

/PK 85

/PK QC QC QC QC 5 (LLOQ L M H ULOQ). 3 (L M H) 86

PK BM PK BM PK 87

QC,, ( ) QC 5 (LLOQ L M H ULOQ) 3 (L M H). 88

/PK QC (5 LL L M H UL) 89

/ BM PK 90

Q&A No.25 QC 91

QC 10 92