規則帰納における方向性

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "規則帰納における方向性"

きみえやまがた
6 years ago
Views:

2 Keywords: logical reasoning rule acquisition cognitive directionality goal and motivation conditional inference (, 2000) A A Directionality in Rule Induction, by Masasi Hattori, Koji Nakajima, and Masanori Nakagawa. (, 2000) (2002) 1

3 (, 1990; Hattori & Nakagawa, 1996;, 2000;, 2001) 24 3 p, q, r 1 3 p, q, r 1. (p q r) p q r p q r T T T F (0) T T F T (4) T F T T (8) T F F F (0) F T T T (4) F T F F (0) F F T F (0) F F F T (8) T F p q r (exclusive disjunction) (material equivalence) p q r (1) p q p q p q (p q r) (p q r) ( p q r) ( p q r) (2) 1 3 p, q, r S, W C p, q, r 3 2

4 r p q 1 p, q, r r S r r W r r C 3 p, q, r 24 p, q r p, q 4 r p r q q r p S, W, C 1 3 S, W, C 11, 12, 11 p, q, r 3

5 4 1. r : r p q r 2. p/q : r p q 2 r r 2 q r p 2 3. : 2 4. : 3 1 S01 p q r (1) p q r (2) p q r (3) 3 (4) (5) 1 (1), (2), (3) r (4), (5) (1) (3) 3 1 (4) (1) (3) 4 1 (5) (1) (4) r (1) (4) (5) 2 (5) 1/2 (1) (4) (4) (1) (3) (1) (3) r r 1/2 r 1/2 1 (weighted frequency score; WFS) WFS WFS W 1 (W08) 4

6 WFS 1 S, W 40 % r C C 70 % vs. 50 % C r 0 C χ 2 S W χ 2 (2, N = 23) = 0.188, p =.66 r C S, C W S W r p q r p q r (W01) 2 (W04) 2 1 (C03) 3 (C03) 12 S: 10/11 W: 11/12 W08 C: 10/11 WFS 1 1 p q r p q r (S07) 2 5

7 1. WFS WFS C, W, S C F(2, 31) = 3.20, MSE = 6.62, p =.05 Dunnett C S, W 10 % r WFS F(2, 31) = 8.31, MSE = 4.62, p <.01 Dunnett S, W C 1% 6

8 2. p/q 2 1 S WFS WFS S F(1, 10) = 3.92, MSE = , p < S W S, W 7

9 S r r p, q r

10 (Johnson-Laird & Byrne, 1991) (, 2002) r r (2000, 2002) (, 2002) r 1 Evans (Evans, 1993; Evans & Over, 1996) Stanovich (1999) 2 ( Evans, 1989; Sloman, 1996) Stanovich (1999) (2000, 2002) (, 2000) r r r 9

11 3 (2000) p q p q q p (Hattori, in press) 2 (, 2001) 3 Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Evans, J. St. B. T. (1993). Bias and rationality. In K. I. Manktelow & D. E. Over (Eds.), Rationality: Psychological and philosophical perspectives (pp. 6 30). London: Routledge. Evans, J. St. B. T., & Over, D. E. (1996). Rationality and reasoning. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.. (2000) (2001) (2002) Hattori, M. (in press). A quantitative model of optimal data selection in Wason s selection task. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology. Hattori, M., & Nakagawa, M. (1996). A new experimental method to identify the process of logical reasoning. Japanese Psychological Research, 38, (2001) Johnson-Laird, P. N., & Byrne, R. M. J. (1991). Deduction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.. (1990) Sloman, S. A. (1996). The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 119, Stanovich, K. E. (1999). Who is rational? Studies of individual differences in reasoning. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. (Anderson, 1990) Anderson, J. R. (1990). The adaptive character of thought. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Evans, J. St. B. T. (1989). Bias in human reasoning: Causes and consequences. Hillsdale, NJ: 10

12 (WFS) 2 (e 1,, e n ) e i WFS, s i = 1/n (i = 1,, n) e i c i1,, c im ; s i m c ij WFS, s ij = 1/nm ( j = 1,, m) 2 WFS WFS WFS WFS C03 11

..../....

..../.... 服部雅史 (2005). Wason選択課題におけるデータ選択傾向推論におけるファラシーと合理性をめぐって立命館人間科学研究, 9, 13--22. 立命館大学人間科学研究所研究論文 Wason 選択課題におけるデータ選択傾向推論におけるファラシーと合理性をめぐって服部雅史１２３ The Tendency of Data Selection in the Wason Selection