スマラン_モニタリングレポート.PDF
|
|
|
- せぴあ みつだ
- 7 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 NGOFoE Japan )...4 2)...5 3)...5 4)...6 5) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
2 JBIC ODA NGOLBH Semarang FoE Japan FoE Japan JBIC JICA Kandri, Jatibalan, Keljatirejo, Kedungpani Kandri Kedungpani 6 Bulustalan, Baru Sari Kokorosono Ngemplak Simongan, Potompon, Sampangan JBIC JICA JICA JICA 2
3 :0022: :0022:00 3. Balai Kel. Sampangan Bndan Duwur, Sampangan Balai Kel. Petompon Bendan Ngisor, Petompon km 3 12km 10km 5.3km Bandarharjo 77m 200m 20,400,000m 3 23km km19 3
4 JICA JBIC SAPROF JBIC ) LARAP Governor s Decree No. 11/2004 about building line City Mayor Decree No.7/2004 about Detailed City Plan on Land Use 4 3m EIA a 3m distance from the dyke vary between 3 to 30m from the river edge for the river without dyke 5 6 JBIC 7 JICA LARAP JICA Dinas Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Air, October 2005, Review Environmental Impact Assessment (ANDAL) for Flood Control, Urban Drainage, and Water Resources Development in Semarang Main Report, p. VI-36 5 Ibidp. VI ha
5 5 LARAP 949 A 2.6 ha 2 B ha C 4.7 ha ha 5 p JICA LARAP JICA 5 LARAP 949 2) LARAP LARAP DGRW 8 BPN BAPPEDA LARAP NGO LARAP JBIC LARAP LARAP 3) Directorate General of Water Resources, Ministry of Public Works (DGRW) 9 5
6 4) i) LARAP West SemarangGajah MungkurSouth SemarangNorth SemarangCentral Semarang West Semarang 7 Gajah Mungkur LARAP LARAP fish ponds 11 4 LARAP LARAP JBIC 6
7 7 9 10km 15 6m 10m 4m6m LARAP 3.5m6m 21m 2 16 ii) Kokrosono market 4 7 LARAP Kokrosono market LARAP
8 Kokrosono market Kokrosono Market 2 10 Kokrosono Market Kokrosono Market Ahmad Gazali Kokrosono Market 2 LARAP 7 Kokrosono Market 498 5) ha 297 MijienKedungpane Jatibarang Gunung PatiJatijero Kandri Kandri 11 Kandri6 Jatibarang 1 Jatijero 2 Kedungpane 2 8
9 Kandri RW i) LARAP ,000 m ,000 m Committee for Land Acquisition 18 LARAP Land and Building Tax: NJOP 19 65,000 m 2 100,000 m 2 6 Kandri 3 Jatijero 2 Kedungpane 1 Kandri 20 ii) Decree(No /40) the committee chaired by Executive Secretary for Mayor consist of the representatives of various concerned departments of the city government, and heads of concerned Kecamatan and Kelurahan (EIA, 2005) 19 NJOP NJOP 20 Jatijero 2 Kedungpane 1 9
10 21 Kandri Jatijero Kedungpane Jatibarang %24.0% 27.6% %31.0% % Dinas Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Air, October 2005, Review Environmental Impact Assessment (ANDAL) for Flood Control, Urban Drainage, and Water Resources Development in Semarang Main Report, V-37 * 22 EIA 13 6)
11 ) LARAP ha JBIC/JICA 2) ADB 3)
12 12 4) EIA LARAP 5) LARAP 6)
13 13 7) 23 ODA ODA JBIC
14 14
15
16 16
17 Kokrosono Market 17
現行JICAガイドライン－事務局案 比較表.PDF
JICA 1 JICA 1992 17 9.12(b) ODA 1985 OECD JICA 1988 1990 10 JICA JICAJICA 2002 2004 JICA ODA 2 NGO JICA JICA JICA JICA JICA JICA NGO 2002 12 JICA 2003 9 19 2003 9 JICA JICA 2003 11 2003 12 2004 2004 3
19 Figure-2 General Layout of Mahaica-Mahicony-Abary Lower River Basin Rural Development Plan Study Location Map of Cooperative Republic of Guyana PROJECT DIGEST 1. PROJECT TITLE : Mahaica-Mahaicony-Abary
untitled
1 2 3 4 5 (1834) 1834 200 6 7 8 9 10 11 (1791) (17511764) (1824) 1843 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 (1791) (1791) (17511764) (17511764) (1824)1843
DocuPrint C5450 ユーザーズガイド
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 10 1 11 1 12 1 13 1 14 1 15 1 16 17 1 1 18 1 19 1 20 1 21 1 22 1 23 1 24 1 25 1 26 27 1 1 28 1 29 1 30 1 31 1 2 12 13 3 2 10 11 4 9 8 7 6 5 34 24 23 14 15 22 21 20 16 19 18 17 2 35
1 (1) 3 4 (2) 5 () 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 410 519 599 975 1,176 1,362 1,840 250 298 426 691 735 829 693 865 1,287 1,838 2,209 2,718 2,776 3,361 888 1,061 1,448 1,598 1,849 2,157 2,214 1,324 1,172 964 808
PDF.....p
5 NGO 2006 2010 ODA JICA JBIC AusAid 118 5 VAMSEPII 2004 2007 VAMSEPII 1 NPO 2 3 4 1 NGO 119 1980 ODA 1 ALNAP 1 FASID http://www.fasid. or.jp/chosa/oda/kenkyukai.html 120 5 Active Learning Network for
<30335F8FAC88E490EC8E812E696E6464>
ODA ODA ODA ODA Lodge and WilsonStiglitz MDGs DAC HIV HIV United Nations OECD DAC OECD OECD DAC DAC DAC ODA ODA ODA ODA GNP GDP ODA Chun ODA ODA OECD ODA ODA ODA ODA ODA ODA ODA a ODA OECD EDCF Economic
1 1 1 11 25 2 28 2 2 6 10 8 30 4 26 1 38 5 1 2 25 57ha 25 3 24ha 3 4 83km2 15cm 5 8ha 30km2 8ha 30km2 4 14
3 9 11 25 1 2 2 3 3 6 7 1 2 4 2 1 1 1 11 25 2 28 2 2 6 10 8 30 4 26 1 38 5 1 2 25 57ha 25 3 24ha 3 4 83km2 15cm 5 8ha 30km2 8ha 30km2 4 14 60 m3 60 m3 4 1 11 26 30 2 3 15 50 2 1 4 7 110 2 4 21 180 1 38
１
10 200 15 20 50 (1) (2) 45 A4 JICA 15 WS 1 [] a. b. 10 A 30 15 15 NGO PC 5 15 15 15 15 NGO 1948 1970 10 NGO 90 AB 40 40 WS 1 NGO 40 WS Q 43 63 73 15 9 8 5 5 4 63 17 9 8 6 6 4 2000 14 15 100 2000 1
7/30 40 8/4 7/30 18:00 19:00 7/31 10:00 15:00 7/31 10:00 15:00 8/20 12:30 15:00 8/21 13:00 15:00 ( 49ha) JA () TEL 079-421-9026
( ) ( ) 7/30 40 8/4 7/30 18:00 19:00 7/31 10:00 15:00 7/31 10:00 15:00 8/20 12:30 15:00 8/21 13:00 15:00 ( 49ha) JA () TEL 079-421-9026 H144 H2358 H148 H2319 H1563 H23221 H1587 H23122 H1549 5,800 H22265
特別案件等調査「東欧廃棄物処理行政」コース
No. JR 02-301 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 () - 1 - - 2 - - 3 - - 4 - - 5 - 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57
untitled
1998 6 25 ( ) 1 10 1982 10 28 37/7 1990 12 14 45/94 (WHO) 1 1989 12 8 NGO (ECE) 3 1995 10 25 ECE 1991 2 25 1992 3 17 1998 6 4 1 2 1. 2. a b c (a) (b) d 17 3. a b (a) c (b) 4. 5. 3 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7.
インドガンジス河汚染対策流域管理計画調査予備調査報告書及び事前調査報告書
SW SW ADB Asian Development Bank AIIH & PH All India Institute of Hygiene and Public Health AL ASP BOD COD CPCB DFID DIC DO EC EERI EIA ENVIS FC GAP GEMS GoAP ICDP ITRC JBIC JICA JS KNN MINARS
No.7, (2006) A Survey of Legislation Regarding Environmental Information in Europe and Japan IWATA Motokazu Nihon University, Graduate School of
No.7, 35-44 (2006) A Survey of Legislation Regarding Environmental Information in Europe and Japan IWATA Motokazu Nihon University, Graduate School of Social and Cultural Studies As Principle 10 of the
43 + +* / +3+0,, 22*,, ++..0/ / 1/. / / + /* *,* +* *.* /* 0 +0 2*,/./ +3+,. + : / 3 / +** +**, // /. /+ /+ + * * + +2 +2 +3,* 3 3 ++ +, 0.. /3 : +/,.
42 * :. +, / /0/ ha, +. 2, 2ha. + : :, / /0/ +3,2. 2 / * 43 + +* / +3+0,, 22*,, ++..0/ / 1/. / / + /* *,* +* *.* /* 0 +0 2*,/./ +3+,. + : / 3 / +** +**, // /. /+ /+ + * * + +2 +2 +3,* 3 3 ++ +, 0.. /3
FC741E2_091201
T101-1587-04 1 2 2 0 0 9 2 0 0 8 0 9 0 1 0 5 0 9 1 4 0 5 1 0 5 5 1 2 3 4 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 0 3 3 0 2 1 1 5 0 1 3 3 3 0 2 0 3 0 3 4 0 9 1 1 0 9 0 9 1 1 5
) km 200 m ) ) ) ) ) ) ) kg kg ) 017 x y x 2 y 5x 5 y )
001 ) g 20 g 5 300 g 7 002 720 g 2 ) g 003 0.8 m 2 ) cm 2 004 12 15 1 3 1 ) 005 5 0.8 0.4 ) 6 006 5 2 3 66 ) 007 1 700 12 ) 008 0.315 ) 009 500 g ) kg 0.2 t 189 kg 17.1 kg 010 5 1 2 cm 3 cm )km 2-1 - 011
第１章 調査の概要
1997 8 10 NPPTNPPT 1-4 5-9 12 3 PC AL PC1,611 AL181 PC UNDP 2001 162 99 75 83 92 103 15 88.51999 1 93.9 84.0 2 2490 2000 3 765.74.84.11.5 4 3 4 44 8900km 2 1.2 14 1 2-1 km 2 1km 2 166.6 1,530.2
A: B: C: D: E: a: b: 1: 2: 3: 4: 5: 6: 7: Figure 1. Land-use around the Songkhla Lakes A: Rice field B: Urban area C: Fish/Shrimp ponds D: I
I (Kates et al., 1990) Rigg (1995) (1997) (Srivardhana, 1993) Hirai et al.(1999) 1,182 km 2 Somboon and Paphavasit (1993), (1997), (1995, 1999, 2000) 4 10 km 3 81 14 2001 1 A: B: C: D: E: a: b: 1: 2: 3:
10 1897 1610 1973 48 400 1613 1676 1687 1300 1684 1500 1 1000 18 100 1877 2 1885 1890 1891 3 1892 2 1894 1896 2000 1900 5000 ( ) 1901 ( ) 1904 1917 ( 6 ) ( ) 1882 ( 15 ) 1885 4 25 3000 1881 14 1900 33
0
... 1... 2... 3... 5... 10... 13... 15... 19... 22... 24... 26... 27 0 0 1 2 H13 12 3 4 H21 15.7 5 29.8 10 1 6 4 1 10 1 50,284 48,834 46,185 41,056 33,892 26,726 7 8 9 1012 10 11 12 136ha 80.7ha 13 14
総務委員会会議録
29 28 29 29 () 121 1 111 11928 3 () () () () 11928 3 1,320 32,7897,000 () 1 23725,000 9 1,320 313 2,7897,000 2 2 2 5.5 16 15200 31 29 2931 3110 21 21 5 6 8,2195,000 2134,1097,000 1,320 32,7897,000 31 ()
- 111 -
- 110 - - 111 - - 112 - - 113 - - 114 - - 115 - - 116 - - 117 - - 118 - - 119 - - 120 - - 121 - - 122 - - 123 - - 124 - - 125 - - 126 - - 127 - - 128 - - 129 - - 130 - - 131 - - 132 - - 133 - - 134 - -
2 3 2
1 2 3 2 ha ha ha 3 4 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) 5 5 ( ) ( ) 3 ( ) ( ),,, 5 6 7 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) 6 36.3% ( ) 8 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) 3 5 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
untitled
2 23 3 28 10 12 1 2 3 18 6 1 1 2 9 9 5 22 1 22 10 2 100 9 9 9 1 11 2,300 22 10 8 90 5 80 90 100 5,000 100 90 5 90 8 90 13 1 22 20 / 14 / 10 / 1 13 80 8 80 80 7 8 13 80 7 90 2 200 300 3 4 10 1 1 90 5 90
- 1 - - 2 - - 3 - - 4 - - 5 - - 6 - - 7 - - 8 - ) () ( untitled
1,985ha 41.5 2,799ha 58.5 4,784ha 100.0 3 14,210 0 0.0 27 57,590 37,140 64.5 3 1,800 930 51.7 6 1,150 1,150 31.0 39 77,310 39,220 50.7 34 8-3 34 8-4 52 1-6 52 2-3 53 1-6 56 1-2 56 1 18 12 17 30 50
9 5 1 9 30 17 10 1 21 30 18 10 1 22 30 18 10 1 20 30 16 10 1 20 30 31 16 60 9 63 9 65 9 3 14 1 2 3 4 19 10 1 5,600 20,000 21,500 10 10 1,540 1,540 950 950 178 15 5,329 19 1,900 200 19 12 1 200 3,429
０．表紙
60 10 11 11 11,600 36,500 10,500 7,900 +1,500+1,500+9,000+18,0003,70041,600 12 3.84ha 3,100 3,100 4,400 2,785 5,000 50 70 3,500 3,500 2,600 30 2,600 45 3,375 40 4,500 20 2,000 12 1,500 12 2,300 7,500
,
34 29 5 29 6 29 7 30 28 26 1 1-71 - , - 72 - 27 3 1, - 73 - 5811 5821 5822 5831 58 2 5841 5851 5861 5862 5863 5864 5892 5896 5897 5898 5891 5895 7711 622 6311 6312 6314 6324 6032 6033 7611 7621 7623 7624
-2-
-1- -2- -3-24 32ha 13-4- 30-5- -6- -7- 100-8- 20 20 100-9- 100-10- 100 100-11- -12-30 -13- 10-14- 52 71 59-15- 30-16- -17- -18- 31 31-19- -20- 47 52 71 29 41 59 306 88 348-21- -22- -23- -24- 12-25- 1,300
SURF 200000300104 Sendai Urban Research Forum 1 1 1 4 5 5 5 5 6 8 8 13 17 18 20 20 23 29 35 35 35 35 36 36 37 37 39 40 44 44 45 45 49 51 52 54 60 52 63 69 69 70 71 72 73 70 70 70 71 71 72 74 78 86 102
Table 1 Utilization of Data for River Water Table 2 Utilization of Data for Groundwater Quality Analysis5,6,9,10,13,14) Quality Analysis5-13) Fig. 1 G
Key Words: river water quality, groundwater quality, manpower development, sewerage Table 1 Utilization of Data for River Water Table 2 Utilization of Data for Groundwater Quality Analysis5,6,9,10,13,14)
untitled
30 2015 51-62 2015/01/17 2015/03/31 1914 * Literature Survey on Damage of Akita Mining College due to the 1914 Akita-Senboku Earthquake Toshihiko MIZUTA Center for Regional Development, Akita University
ベトナム国下水道に関する法令等リスト
1 Legal framework relating to drainage/sewerage as of 20 th January, 2011 LAW On environmental protection, 2005 Ha Noi, day 29 month 11 year 2005 http://moj.gov.vn/vbpq/en/lists/vn%20bn%20php%20lut/view_detail.aspx?itemid=5961,
ab c d 6 12 1:25,000 28 3 2-1-3 18 2-1-10 25000 3120 10 14 15 16 7 2-1-4 1000ha 10100ha 110ha ha ha km 200ha 100m 0.3 ha 100m 1m 2-1-11 2-1-5 20cm 2-1-12 20cm 2003 1 05 12 2-1-13 1968 10 7 1968 7 1897
障がい者制度改革推進会議（第32回）議事録
32 17 18 31 22 22 15 40 60 1 50 30 25 20 27 40 13 50 27 2 JDF DPI JIL 27 9,000 100 1,800 500 100 250 27 18 3 18 23 96.9 22 22 31 88.7 22 31 72.7 250 15 15 27 9,000 250 5,000 9,000 100 100 9,000 15 4 5