73 73 1930 1 1930 1920 1920 1 1975 1974 2003-21 pp.31-53 2005 pp.33-74 1998-16 pp.63-91 2005 2 pp.39-72
74 74 59 1 2 3 1 4 1 1920 1930 2 2 pp.168-171 3 1974 pp.353-660 1991-15 2 pp.25-38 1995-61 3 pp.32-61 4
75 75 1 1920 1. 1 1920 5 8 6 1 1929 1930 1933 1934 55 40 1926 500 1927 425 3,400 3,620 1928 1,666 3,100 6,170 1929 1,865 2,360 889 7,023 1932 2,781 1,558 7,917 1933 3,000 1,802 3,066 11,230 1934 3,196 3,227 15,906 1935 3,375 3,146 21,972 1928 1929 1930-1936 1929-1936 1972 17482 12142 1935 231 5 pp.75-77 6 p.76
76 76 59 1 1930 1 7 1922 1923 8 1. 2 1920 2 1 2 3 4 9 7 1948 pp.119-120 8 1964 pp.572-573 9 1927 5 18
77 77 10 11 1920 12 13 10 p.420 11 p.420 12 1925 3 29 13 1928 8 29
78 78 59 1 14 1927 2 5 580 550 1 1. 3 1927 15 1927 16 1927 14 1927 5 18 15 1928 p.1 16 p.589
79 79 1969 16 1930 943 507 180 780 16 389 1,969 24 1631. 1930). 17 17 1928 10 19
80 80 59 1 18 16 11 19 20 2 2. 1 1920 1930 1934 3,624 2,432 1,191 / 1,367 795 570 2,106,447 3,767 0.17 4,932 4,778 154 2,500 1,547 952 / 12,423 9,552 2,867 25,297,373 25,166 0.09 1935. 18 p.486 19 p.486 20 206 1931 5 p.13
81 81 1934 1 2000 3000 4 1 21 0.09 0.17 120 120 22 21 22
82 82 59 1 1931 23 24 1920 25 2. 2 23 pp.63-64 1950 24 pp.165-166 3 2 25 1934 9 21
83 83 26 27 28 4 20 5 30 26 1937 pp.187-188 27 p.187 28 1931 p.31
84 84 59 1 1,049 1936 79 4 19.7 2,817 149 18.9 101 5 20.2 76 2 38.0 79 3 26.3 73 4 18.2 3,225 167 19.3 1937. 1929 10 442 10-19 383 20-29 224 30-39 100 40-49 56 50-69 62 70-99 28 100 46 1,341. 1931.
85 85 2. 3 29 1931 30 31 1936 1937 1936 500 860 50 60 1937 351 378 1933 29 30 p.67 31 1936 p.295
86 86 59 1 1000 6 4 1935 9 1930 1,434 1,653 86 1931 1,987 2,410 82 1932 2,537 3,135 80 1933 2,907 3,644 79 1934 1,048 1,547 67 1935 712 935 76 1936 818 1,408 58 1930-1936 1932 67.89 31.33 0.25 0.00 0.53 949 1933 74.04 25.66 0.16 0.00 0.15 1,462 1934 65.33 20.75 7.57 6.34 0.00 1,702 1935 6.98 2.50 0.00 87.26 3.26 31 1935 1-3 7 1930-1935
87 87 32 33 1 34 32 1935 231 p.69 33 p.69 34
88 88 59 1 1 1920 2 3 2 1930 17
89 89 The Doshisha University Economic Review Vol.59 No.1 Abstract Masaaki FUKUOKA, The Entry of Japanese Trading Companies into the Rayon Textile Production The purpose of this paper is to show why Japanese trading companies dealing with rayon textile entered the weaving and dying process of this article. In the 1930s Gunma, Fukui and Ishikawa Prefectures, well-known sanchi (producing areas) for silk textile, began to produce rayon textile, which promoted the Japanese export of rayon textile. However, the poor quality of Japanese rayon textile provoked many complaints from the consumers and Japanese trading companies in this line suffered from the same claims made by foreign consumers. The rayon textile production was characterized by the product process organized by the wholesale merchants at sanchi in other words, Japanese trading companies were supplied rayon textile entirely by the wholesale merchants at sanchi. So it can be concluded that Japanese trading companies direct entry into the producing process of rayon textile was one of the counter-measures for solving this trouble.