企業倒産とマクロ経済要因

Similar documents
Applying Econometric Forecasting to Estimate the Impact of Discounted Highway Tolls: Model for Kansai Region A regional econometric model is often use


平成28年度国民経済計算 年次推計 (支出側系列等)

..,,...,..,...,,.,....,,,.,.,,.,.,,,.,.,.,.,,.,,,.,,,,.,,, Becker., Becker,,,,,, Becker,.,,,,.,,.,.,,

<30315F985F95B65F90B490852E696E6464>

Czech companies are getting pessimistic

untitled

No.3 14

浜松医科大学紀要

OECD Benartzi and Thaler Brown et al. Mottla and Utkus Rooiji et al. Atkinson et al. MacFarland et al. Elton et al. Tang et al. Benartzi and Thaler Br

Fig. 4. Configuration of fatigue test specimen. Table I. Mechanical property of test materials. Table II. Full scale fatigue test conditions and test

雇用不安時代における女性の高学歴化と結婚タイミング-JGSSデータによる検証-

06’ÓŠ¹/ŒØŒì

The effect of tax rate and deduction in income taxation In Japan, numerous attempts have been made to reform the income taxation system. Researchers h

Studies of Foot Form for Footwear Design (Part 9) : Characteristics of the Foot Form of Young and Elder Women Based on their Sizes of Ball Joint Girth

2 94

【教】⑥久我直人先生【本文】/【教】⑥久我直人先生【本文】

KII, Masanobu Vol.7 No Spring

2 The Bulletin of Meiji University of Integrative Medicine 3, Yamashita 10 11

企業の信頼性を通じたブランド構築に関する考察

:- Ofer Feldman,Feldman : -

富山県金融経済クォータリー(2018年夏)

, , , ,

Rhythmic Gymnastics RG 3) 2 GymnastikTurnen ) ) 1963 Modern Gymnastics FIG 10 Modern Rhythmic Gymnastics 1977 Modern Rhythmic S

経済指標カレンダー 5 月 7, 月 13,2017 AUD 1.50% NZD 1.75% EUR 0.00% CAD 0.50% GBP 0.25% USD 0.75% CHF -0.75% JPY -0.10

「リストラ中高年」の行方

第2章_プラントコストインデックス

Kyoto University * Filipino Students in Japan and International Relations in the 1930s: An Aspect of Soft Power Policies in Imperial Japan

<82E682B15F8E E696E6464>

Web Stamps 96 KJ Stamps Web Vol 8, No 1, 2004


<8ED089EF8B D312D30914F95742E696E6464>

) ,


01ⅢⅣⅤⅥⅦⅧⅨⅩ一二三四五六七八九零壱弐02ⅢⅣⅤⅥⅦⅧⅨⅩ一二三四五六七八九零壱弐03ⅢⅣⅤⅥⅦⅧⅨⅩ一二三四五六七八九零壱弐04ⅢⅣⅤⅥⅦⅧⅨⅩ一二三四五六七八九零壱弐05ⅢⅣⅤⅥⅦⅧⅨⅩ一二三四五六七八九零壱弐06ⅢⅣⅤⅥⅦⅧⅨⅩ一二三四五六

,255 7, ,355 4,452 3,420 3,736 8,206 4, , ,992 6, ,646 4,

先端社会研究 ★5★号/4.山崎

16_.....E...._.I.v2006

Human Welfare 8‐1☆/5.林

高齢化とマクロ投資比率―国際パネルデータを用いた分析―

Ⅰ. 緒言 Suzuki, et al., Ⅱ. 研究方法 1. 対象および方法 1 6 表 1 1, 調査票の内容 図

評論・社会科学 123号(P)☆/1.福田

揃 Lag [hour] Lag [day] 35



2 33,**. + : +/* /++** +/* /++** +/* /++** /** /** F+ +*** F+ +*** / 1*42.,43 /14+,*42 /, , 134,.,43 / 0-41,*42.4, -/41,*43,34,,+4. +

目次はじめに 1. 賃金上昇動向とその要因 賃金上昇の影響 最後に はじめに CLMV RIM 213 Vol.13 No.48 51

28 GCC UAE GCC (2) 大きく上昇した食料価格と住居費 GCC GCC GCC 図表 2 湾岸協力会議 (GCC) 諸国の消費者物価上昇率 (28 年 ) 図表 3 湾岸協力会議 (GCC) 諸国の消費者物価指数に占める食料品と住居費の割合

APUにおける国際化と課題

PowerPoint プレゼンテーション

<4D F736F F D E937897FB8F4B96E291E882CC914F94BC959495AA82CC89F0939A>

05_藤田先生_責

The Effect of the Circumferential Temperature Change on the Change in the Strain Energy of Carbon Steel during the Rotatory Bending Fatigue Test by Ch

untitled

.N..

Ⅱ 方法と対象 1. 所得段階別保険料に関する情報の収集 ~3 1, 分析手法

<93638CB48FBA8E6C2E696E6464>

<95DB8C9288E397C389C88A E696E6462>

Transcription:

No.28 2003 11 Abstract The purpose of this paper is to clarify the relationship between business bankruptcy and macro-economic indices. The method is a multiple linear regression model. As dependent variables, Bankruptcy number of enterprises, the rate of the bankruptcy, and the liabilities of all the bankrupt enterprises are used. The following conclusions were drawn as a result of examining the multiple linear regression analysis. First, the bankruptcy number of cases (logarithm) is explained by two macro-economic indices, a stock price and the job offers to applicants ratio. Secondly, the rate of bankruptcy is explained by four variables, New dwelling construction started, Money stock(m2+cd), Public demand and Outlay of the general government. And thirdly, the liabilities of all the bankrupt enterprises (logarithm) are explained by three macro-economic indices, corporate liquidity, the number of registration of industrial property, and a research and development expenditure. Furthermore, it is discussed about the relation between these three dependent variables. 1) DIP 2) - 47 -

3) 4) 5) 20 20 64 6) 4 (cross-correlation) 2 (lag) (SAS ARIMA ) ( ) ( ) 7) 4 2002 8) ( ) 7 10.310-0.140 0.089 0.184 6 0.036 0.001 0.008 0.136 RSQ 0.882 7 RSQ 0.882 7 k - 48 -

No.28 2003 11 R 2 ˆ = 1 2 ( y y) n 1 2 ( y y) n k 1 n, k (multicollinearity) 2 2002 2002 3 ( ) 2 4 ( ) 3 3 3 35 1 2 3 4 1. - 49 -

2002 ( ) ( ) 9) ( ) 3 ( ) 1.1 1980 2000 21 1 ( ) 1,000 2 2 100 3 35 GDP - 50 -

No.28 2003 11 6 GDP ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) 4 ( ) 10) 5 6 7 ( ) 100 4 3 4 8 [( ) ] 100 4 3 4 11) 10 12) - 51 -

11 12 13 14 GDP GDP 15 13) 16 14) 17 SNA 3 15) 18 19 20 16) 21-52 -

No.28 2003 11 22 (CPI) CPI 17) 23 (WPI) 1 18) 24 GDP 100 25 3 9 1990 3 100 3 26 6 6 2002 3 27 12 12 28-53 -

19) 29 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) 20) 30 ( ) M1 M2 CD M3 CD 4 M2 CD 21) 31 4 4 32 33 22) 34 12 12 35 10 23) - 54 -

No.28 2003 11 36 37 38 1.2 35 y ( ) 1 24) ( multicollinearity ) 25) F ( ) 1 26) 1 F - 55 -

SPSS F 0.05 0.10 1.2.1 1 企業倒産件数 ( 対数 ) 企業倒産率 倒産企業の負債総額 実質化 対数データ 実質化 対数データ 実質化 対数データ 1 企業倒産件数 1.000 1.000.783**.783**.477*.477* 2 企業倒産率.783**.783** 1.000 1.000-0.115-0.115 3 倒産企業の負債総額 0.477*.477* -0.115-0.115 1.000 1.000 4 為替相場 0.371 0.3.836**.808** -.509* -.575** 5 輸入 -0.178-0.244 -.726** -.769**.698**.641** 6 輸出 0.13 0.097-0.263-0.28.737**.713** 7 売上高経常利益率 -.577** -.577** -0.216-0.216 -.513* -.513* 8 手元流動性 -878** -.878** -.874** -.874** -0.229-0.229 9 設備投資 -.626** -.603** -.899** -.908** 0.333 0.358 10 機械受注 -0.277-0.303 -.739** -.765**.649**.634** 11 人件費 -0.087-0.16 -.669** -.726**.769**.722** 12 役員給与 0.061-0.054 -.529* -.638**.832**.782** 13 資本合計 -0.149-0.253 -.705** -.784**.749**.667** 14 実質 GDP 指数 -0.207-0.207 -.758** -.758**.695**.695** 15 鉱工業生産指数 -.487* -.487* -.883** -.883**.488*.488* 16 新設住宅着工件数 -.784** -.775** -.751** -.754** -0.346-0.327 17 一般政府支出 -0.041-0.11 -.621** -.680**.794**.753** 18 公的需要 0.001-0.051 -.592** -.636**.800**.776** 19 民間需要 -0.324-0.349 -.823** -.839**.634**.608** 20 実質家計消費支出 -0.171-0.221 -.732** -.765**.716**.674** 21 実質家計可処分所得 -0.246-0.284 -.781** -.804**.671**.634** 22 消費者物価指数 -0.126-0.126 -.696** -.696**.730**.730** 23 卸売物価指数 0.201 0.201.700**.700** -.575** -.575** 24 地価要因 -0.431 -.434* 0.027 0.019 -.746** -.747** 25 全国工業地指数 -0.41-0.41 -.831** -.831**.484*.484* 26 六大都市商業地地価指数 -.825** -.825** -.750** -.750** -0.238-0.238 27 株価 -.889** -.806** -.838** -.879** -0.299-0.121 28 完全失業率 0.361-0.361-0.134-0.134.753**.753** 29 有効求人倍率 -.845** -.845** -.582** -.582** -0.396-0.396 30マネーサプライ -0.253-0.318 -.769** -.817**.673**.613** 31 銀行の貸出 -.633** -.589** -.559** -.494* -0.345-0.379 32 公定歩合 -0.133-0.133.462*.462* -.697** -.697** 33 銀行貸出金利 -0.179-0.179 0.411 0.411 -.730** -.730** 34 実質コールレート -0.154-0.154 0.414 0.414 -.667** -.667** 35 10 年国債利回り -0.015-0.015.551**.551** -.704** -.704** 36 工業所有権登録数 0.098 0.087-0.356-0.389.522*.526* 37 新規企業数 -.781** -.663** -.463* -0.284 -.508* -.650** 38 研究開発費 -0.173-0.239 -.727** -.769**.727**.662** 1 0.5 1 35 9 0.5 4 1 1 26-0.494-56 -

No.28 2003 11 7 0.5 1 26 7 0.5 1.2.2 ( ) SPSS 35 F 3 ( ) ( ) 2 ( ) ( ) 6 6 ( ) 4 ( ) 2 ( ) ( ) 10 8 ( ) ( ) 3 0.5 2. SPSS TSP SPSS ( 2) TSP 2 AIC( ) SPSS TSP 2-57 -

- 58 -

No.28 2003 11 3. ( ) ( ) R 2 0.879 DW=1.822 d U DW 2 ( ) 2 0.00002441 0.502 1 2 ( ) ( ) R 2 0.966 DW=2.583 6 4 d U DW 4 d L ( ) 6 6 0.476 6 0.005101 6 6 ( ) 0.589-59 -

6 6 ( ) R 2 0.976 DW=2.122 2 DW 4 d 4 0.0003038 (M2 CD) 0.000006923 M2+CD 0.00006831 0.00001547 4 ( ) R 2 0.908 DW=1.410 d DW d 2 1.020 0.768 2 DW L U U - 60 -

No.28 2003 11 ( ) ( ) R 2 0.988 DW=2.634 8 4 d U DW 4 d L ( ) 10 8 0.07008 0.0002017 0.05320 ( ) 10 8 ( ) ( ) R 2 0.963 DW=2.278 2 DW 4 d U ( ) 3 0.440 1.094 3.407 ( ) 3-61 -

4. ( ) 2 ( ) 10.437 0.00002441 0.502 4 1.678 0.0003038 0.000006923 0.00006831 0.00001547 3 ( ) 4.620 0.440 1.094 3.407 28) 0.44% 1 1.094 3.407 1% ( ) ( ) 3 ( ) ( ) 3 3 ( ) 1 1 2 1 0.783 0.477 0.115 2 3 2-62 -

No.28 2003 11 図 1 倒産件数 倒産率 負債総額の推移 ( 実質 ) 3.00 2.50 倒産件数 0.0001 倒産率 % 負債総額 ( 百万円 ) 0.0000001 2.49 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.50 2.08 1.92 1.88 1.79 1.76 1.71 1.75 1.23 1.17 1.21 1.28 1.11 1.13 1.03 0.42 0.47 0.42 0.35 0.33 0.29 0.30 1.90 1.88 1.65 1.41 1.46 1.51 1.54 1.48 1.41 1.41 1.38 1.39 1.27 1.07 1.01 0.92 0.83 0.82 0.71 0.72 0.65 0.61 0.63 0.61 0.67 0.76 0.74 0.76 0.68 0.59 0.61 0.55 0.62 0.48 0.56 0.37 0.31 0.23 0.22 0.21 0.13 0.00 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 年 ( ) ( ) 3 ( ) 2 4 ( ) 3 ( ) - 63 -

2002.3 25 2002.11 ( )38(2)1986.12 62(6)1987.9 22 1 2 1988.12 2003.pp.117-126 2002 2002.pp.272-273 ( 6) 1993.pp.239-242 ( 10).p68 ( 10).p76 ( 10).p108 ( 10).pp.65-66 ( 10).p269 ( 10).p51 ( 10).pp.153-155 ( 10).pp.147-150 ( 10).pp.133-135 ( 10).p136 [ ] FAQ(http://www.boj.or.jp/stat/stat_f.htm2003.9.12 ) ( 10).pp.204-206 ( 10).pp.221-223 pp.128-129 ( ) 1993.pp.70-74 ( 24)p138 F F F F-in F-out 2.0 2.5 F ( ( 24)pp.139-141) 1998.p243-64 -