調査結果(施設用).PDF

Similar documents
gm3280-d_j.indd

15_jikojirei_9.4

Microsoft Word - 2TXL実施要綱 doc

01 Total assist Total assist 02

「東京都子供・子育て支援総合計画」中間見直し版(案)第2章 子供と家庭をめぐる状況

NSネットピアレビュー報告書

Count in Crimes

i152.j

93, , , , , , , , , , , ,0 7.7, , ,6 5

SNP.23 SNP.4 SNP.5 SNP.6 SNP SNP.8 SN

青色LED「200 億円判決」の決定的な誤り

スライド タイトルなし

untitled

Prepress Press Postpress 9 9 1

1 -, XX Total Fertility Rate 1 2

今日は、この後予定している個別コンサルテーションも踏まえながら、今後トータルケアを進めていくにあたっての具体的な手法などについて認識を深めていただきたく、今日をきっかけに自分の地域での目標をつくって欲しい

12-1 -

% 1,310 1, , % % , , , C

untitled


第3巻/5-3

,5, 6 6 9, ,,5, ,5,, , TAKKEN vol.

H22 BioS t (i) treat1 treat2 data d1; input patno treat1 treat2; cards; ; run; 1 (i) treat = 1 treat =

uPC2711TB,uPC2712TB DS

FY2001 INTERIM EARNINGS ANNOUNCEMENT

Excel97関数編

THE STANDARD OF JAPANESE STYLE To Our Shareholders 1

uPC2745TB,uPC2746TB DS

H22 BioS (i) I treat1 II treat2 data d1; input group patno treat1 treat2; cards; ; run; I

香港

日本化学療法学会雑誌第58巻第4号

16 NanoPlanner name PlanItem.changeset/2 > validate_required([:name]) name :name Ecto.Changeset validate_required/3 Ecto.Changeset "validate_"

Low Friction Anatomic 1

とっきょ29_cs6_0920.indd

A Nutritional Study of Anemia in Pregnancy Hematologic Characteristics in Pregnancy (Part 1) Keizo Shiraki, Fumiko Hisaoka Department of Nutrition, Sc

untitled

グリーンエネルギー普及拡大における太陽光発電の寄与

アルゴリズムとデータ構造1


Microsoft PowerPoint - BIGIP_VerUP_ _TMSH.pptx

ソキアレポート2007秋季号 Vol.18 No.3 Web版



P3 P6 P7 P8 P9 P12 P13 P16 P17 P18 P19 P20 P21 P24 P25 P26 P27 P28 P29 P30 P31 P33 P35 P36 P37 P38 1 2

3. Ok をクリックし クエリビルダーを開きます テーブル ウィンドウから下記のテーブル名を選択し Add をクリックします CATEGORIES ORDER_DETAILS ORDERS PRODUCTS 4. 該当するテーブルを選択した後 Close ボタンをクリックし テーブル ウィンドウを

uPC2745TB,uPC2746TB DS

日本皮膚科学会雑誌第120巻第5号

untitled

TF出力用.indd

5989_7633JAJP(POD).pdf

2007年9月  日

Volleyball Box Score 2014 Hawai'i Women's Volleyball TOYOTA vs Hawai'i (Sep 17, 2014 at Honolulu, O'ahu) ATTACK SET SERVE RECEIVE BLOCK ## TOYOTA S K

E4230JD_ qx4j

untitled

Agenda Transaction とは インプットとは アウトプットとは インプットとアウトプットの関係 手数料 (fee) とは UTXO(Unspent Transaction Output) とは 2

<4D F736F F D E9197BF A93C18B DB88E9197BF967B95B FA94C A2E646F63>

2

/ IR URL: 1


E4385JD_ qx4j

SIP 会議の制御

2

Abbreviation: AD; atopic dermatitis, BA; bronchial asthma, DA; drug allergy, FA; food allergy, BAST; radioallergosolvent test, s. c; subcutaneous

ENZYMOLOGICAL STUDY OF PROSTATIC CANCER I. CHANGES OF SERUM LACTIC DEHYDROGENASE, ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE, LEUCINE AMINOPEPTIDASE, TOTAL ACID PHOSPHATASE

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ wait Call CPU time 1, latch: library cache 7, latch: library cache lock 4, job scheduler co

橡企業説明会.PDF

animus No indd

陸域環境研究センター

Rinku General Medical Center

PM2.5 PM. PM2.5 PM. PM2.5 PM. PM2.5 PM.

41抄録.pm

Copyright SATO International All rights reserved. This software is based in part on the work of the Independen

JAPAN MARKETING JOURNAL 112 Vol.28 No.42009

CV CV CV --

C O U R S E G U I D E B O O K



Providing Care for HIV-infected Woman Amneris E. Luque, MD SMH AIDS Center Medical Director 2002/07/01

7 2000b 2000b 2000b A Vol 8, No 2,

α β *2 α α β β α = α 1 β = 1 β 2.2 α 0 β *3 2.3 * *2 *3 *4 (µ A ) (µ P ) (µ A > µ P ) 10 (µ A = µ P + 10) 15 (µ A = µ P +

Program Design (プログラム設計)

TOEIC

untitled

総括研究成果報告書

LifeKeeperサポートへの問い合わせ

Microsoft PowerPoint - widget.ppt

SmartBrowser_document_build30_update.pptx

JAPAN SYSTEMS V ision Contents

2

K-BASIC 1st: ユニケージ基礎編(前編)

In [5]: soup.tbody Out[5]: <tbody> <tr> <th><label for=""> </label></th> <td> </td> <td><input checked="checked" class="input-label-horizontal" id="se

Microsoft PowerPoint - ie ppt

スライド 1

0706.indd

テストコスト抑制のための技術課題-DFTとATEの観点から

ガイダンス


Microsoft Word - PATENTBOY/Netバージョンアップ説明書_V1.30__ doc

広島県獣医学会雑誌24号.indd

JBA indd

Transcription:

19 1 2

328 65 501 18 12 328 65.5 2. 173 35 1. 328 65 N=501 «1» 1 501 328 65.5 2 1. 010 46 14.0% 14.4% 14.4% 2. 1120 58 17.7% 18.2% 32.6% 3. 2130 52 15.9% 16.3% 48.9% 4. 3140 25 7.6% 7.8% 56.7% 5. 4150 60 18.3% 18.8% 75.5% 6. 5160 21 6.4% 6.6% 82.1% 7. 6170 12 3.7% 3.8% 85.9% 8. 7180 12 3.7% 3.8% 89.7% 9. 8190 11 3.4% 3.4% 93.1% 10. 91100 13 4.0% 4.1% 97.2% 11. 101110 3 0.9% 0.9% 98.1% 12. 111120 3 0.9% 0.9% 99.1% 13. 121130 3 0.9% 0.9% 100.0% 319 97.3% 100.0% 9 2.7% 9 2.7% 328 100.0% 1

3 1. 010 42 12.8% 13.8% 13.8% 2. 1120 49 14.9% 16.1% 29.8% 3. 2130 35 10.7% 11.5% 41.3% 4. 3140 18 5.5% 5.9% 47.2% 5. 4150 55 16.8% 18.0% 65.2% 6. 5160 16 4.9% 5.2% 70.5% 7. 6170 23 7.0% 7.5% 78.0% 8. 7180 14 4.3% 4.6% 82.6% 9. 8190 15 4.6% 4.9% 87.5% 10. 91100 13 4.0% 4.3% 91.8% 11. 101110 2 0.6% 0.7% 92.5% 12. 111120 6 1.8% 2.0% 94.4% 13. 121130 3 0.9% 1.0% 95.4% 14. 131 14 4.3% 4.6% 100.0% 305 93.0% 100.0% 23 7.0% 23 7.0% 328 100.0% B 328 1 100 2 3 2

327 164 50 163 50 4 2. 1. 163 50 164 50 N=327 «2» 4 1. 164 50.0% 50.2% 50.2% 2. 163 49.7% 49.8% 100.0% 327 99.7% 100.0% 1 0.3% 1 0.3% 328 100.0% 4 1 4 1. 164 146 5 13 115 78.88 19 13 5.12 8 4. 19 13 5 3. 31 21 1. 27 19 2. 57 39 N=146 «3» 5 4 1 1. 27 8.2% 18.5% 18.5% 2. 57 17.4% 39.0% 57.5% 3. 31 9.5% 21.2% 78.8% 4. 19 5.8% 13.0% 91.8% 5. 12 3.7% 8.2% 246.6% 146 44.5% 100.0% 163 49.7% 19 5.8% 182 55.5% 328 100.0% 3

5. (1 ) 100010000 2 327 3 58 18 2 6 3 117 1 12 1 35 10 7 3 6 1. 58 18 2. 269 82 N=327 «4» 6 3 1. 58 17.7% 17.7% 17.7% 2. 269 82.0% 82.3% 100.0% 327 99.7% 100.0% 1 0.3% 1 0.3% 328 100.0% 7 3 6 1 1. 1 17 5.2% 32.7% 32.7% 2. 2 17 5.2% 32.7% 65.4% 3. 3 13 4.0% 25.0% 90.4% 4. 4 3 0.9% 5.8% 96.2% 5. 5 1 0.3% 1.9% 98.1% 6. 6 1 0.3% 1.9% 100.0% 52 15.9% 100.0% 269 82.0% 7 2.1% 276 84.1% 328 100.0% 6 1. 58 52 4

56 324 3 180 56 8 270 2 1 87 551 2 9 3 8 2. 144 44 1. 180 56 N=324 «5» 8 3 1. 180 54.9% 55.6% 55.6% 2. 144 43.9% 44.4% 100.0% 324 98.8% 100.0% 4 1.2% 4 1.2% 328 100.0% 9 3 8 1 1. 1 87 26.5% 55.1% 55.1% 2. 2 38 11.6% 24.1% 79.1% 3. 3 28 8.5% 17.7% 96.8% 4. 4 2 0.6% 1.3% 98.1% 5. 5 3 0.9% 1.9% 100.0% 158 48.2% 100.0% 144 43.9% 26 7.9% 170 51.8% 328 100.0% 81. 180 158 5

10 52 320 168 52 2. 1. 152 48 168 52 N=320 «6» 10 1. 168 51.2% 52.5% 52.5% 2. 152 46.3% 47.5% 100.0% 320 97.6% 100.0% 8 2.4% 8 2.4% 328 100.0% 11 44 319 141 434 2. 1. 178 56 141 44 N=319 «7» 11 1. 141 43.0% 44.2% 44.2% 2. 178 54.3% 55.8% 100.0% 319 97.3% 100.0% 9 2.7% 9 2.7% 328 100.0% 6

1 1 3 4 5 2 24 28 4 4 5 5 3 4 225 73 1 85 27 1 40 47 6 4 5 7 2 2 8 1 1 9 1 1 N=310 10 2 2 «8» N=85 «9» 213 310 1 85 27 213 213 12 1 85 75 1 5 15 17 12 213 310 18 13 1. 0 225 68.6% 72.6% 72.6% 2. 1 40 12.2% 12.9% 85.5% 3. 2 24 7.3% 7.7% 93.2% 4. 3 4 1.2% 1.3% 94.5% 5. 4 4 1.2% 1.3% 95.8% 6. 5 3 0.9% 1.0% 96.8% 7. 6 4 1.2% 1.3% 98.1% 8. 7 2 0.6% 0.6% 98.7% 9. 8 1 0.3% 0.3% 99.0% 10. 9 1 0.3% 0.3% 99.4% 11. 10 2 0.6% 0.6% 100.0% 310 94.5% 100.0% 18 5.5% 18 5.5% 328 100.0% 7

140 122 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 70 19 84 38 14 25 10 20 14 «10» 196 1. 122 62 4. 84 43 2. 70 36 14 Pct of Pct of Dichotomy label Count Responses Cases 1. 122 30.3% 62.2% 2. 70 17.4% 35.7% 3. 19 4.7% 9.7% 4. 84 20.9% 42.9% 5. 38 9.5% 19.4% 6. 10 2.5% 5.1% 7. 25 6.2% 12.8% 20 5.0% 10.2% 9. 14 3.5% 7.1% Total responses 402 100.0% 205.1% 196 132 8

2 17 324 17 1 6 2 6 3 15 1. 6 2 2. 318 98 N=324 «11» 15 17 1. 6 1.8% 1.9% 1.9% 2. 318 97.0% 98.1% 100.0% 324 98.8% 100.0% 4 1.2% 4 1.2% 328 100.0% 16 17 15 1 1. 1 6 1.8% 100.0% 100.0% 6 1.8% 100.0% 318 97.0% 4 1.2% 322 98.2% 328 100.0% 15 1. 6 6 9

14 325 17 1 46 14 70 4 1 46 70 17 17 2. 279 86 1. 46 14 N=325 «12» 17 17 1. 46 14.0% 14.2% 14.2% 2. 279 85.1% 85.8% 100.0% 325 99.1% 100.0% 3 0.9% 3 0.9% 328 100.0% 18 17 17 1 1. 1 28 8.5% 63.6% 63.6% 2. 2 12 3.7% 27.3% 90.9% 3. 3 2 0.6% 4.5% 95.5% 4. 4 0 0.0% 0.0% 95.5% 5. 5 0 0.0% 0.0% 95.5% 6. 6 2 0.6% 4.5% 100.0% 44 13.4% 100.0% 279 85.1% 5 1.5% 284 86.6% 328 100.0% 17 1. 46 44 10

7 324 17 1 24 7 28 5 17 19 1. 24 7 2. 300 93 N=324 «13» 19 17 1. 24 7.3% 7.4% 7.4% 2. 300 91.5% 92.6% 100.0% 324 98.8% 100.0% 4 1.2% 4 1.2% 328 100.0% 20 17 19 1 1. 1 21 6.4% 87.5% 87.5% 2. 2 2 0.6% 8.3% 95.8% 3. 3 1 0.3% 4.2% 100.0% 24 7.3% 100.0% 300 91.5% 4 1.2% 304 92.7% 328 100.0% 19 1. 24 24 11

20 323 17 1 63 20 80 6 1 1 84 2 15 1 1 11 17 21 1. 63 20 2. 260 80 N=323 «14» 21 17 1. 63 19.2% 19.5% 19.5% 2. 260 79.3% 80.5% 100.0% 323 98.5% 100.0% 5 1.5% 5 1.5% 328 100.0% 22 17 21 1 1. 1 51 15.5% 83.6% 83.6% 2. 2 9 2.7% 14.8% 98.4% 3. 3 0 0.0% 0.0% 98.4% 4. 4 0 0.0% 0.0% 98.4% 5. 5 1 0.3% 1.6% 100.0% 61 18.6% 100.0% 260 79.3% 7 2.1% 267 81.4% 328 100.0% 21 1. 63 61 12

200 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 23 20 0 154 41 167 90 40 44 66 23 172 9 «15» 313 9. 172 55 4. 167 53 2. 154 49 23 Pct of Pct of Dichotomy label Count Responses Cases 1. 23 2.9% 7.3% 2. 154 19.1% 49.2% 3. 41 5.1% 13.1% 4. 167 20.7% 53.4% 5. 90 11.2% 28.8% 6. 40 5.0% 12.8% 7. 44 5.5% 14.1% 8. 66 8.2% 21.1% 9. 172 21.3% 55.0% 10. 9 1.1% 2.9% Total responses 806 100.0% 257.5% 313 15 13

22 325 24 72 22 125 7 1 61 7 9 2. 253 78 1. 72 22 N=325 «16» 24 1. 72 22.0% 22.2% 22.2% 2. 253 77.1% 77.8% 100.0% 325 99.1% 100.0% 3 0.9% 3 0.9% 328 100.0% 25 24 1 1. 1 43 13.1% 61.4% 61.4% 2. 2 15 4.6% 21.4% 82.9% 3. 3 7 2.1% 10.0% 92.9% 4. 4 2 0.6% 2.9% 95.7% 5. 5 0 0.0% 0.0% 95.7% 6. 6 0 0.0% 0.0% 95.7% 7. 7 2 0.6% 2.9% 98.6% 8. 8 0 0.0% 0.0% 98.6% 9. 9 1 0.3% 1.4% 100.0% 70 21.3% 100.0% 253 77.1% 5 1.5% 258 78.7% 328 100.0% 24 1. 72 70 14

24 1 27 107 10 5 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 «17» 241. 72 72 26 27 17 62 86 9 13 5 7 26 107 10 5 27 26 Pct of Pct of Dichotomy label Count Responses Cases 1. 62 81.6% 86.1% 2. 9 11.8% 12.5% 3. 5 6.6% 6.9% Total responses 76 100.0% 105.6% 72253 3 24 1 27 26 1. 107 62 263 3 2. 10 9 316 3 3. 5 5 320 3 15

24 1 35 30 25 20 13 15 10 5 0 16 66 1 30 15 9 4 22 29 1 2 «18» 28 70 29 18 29 15 66 22 19 2 28 Pct of Pct of Dichotomy label Count Responses Cases 1. 10 10.1% 14.3% 2. 15 15.2% 21.4% 3. 1 1.0% 1.4% 4. 20 20.2% 28.6% 5. 16 16.2% 22.9% 6. 8 8.1% 11.4% 7. 3 3.0% 4.3% 8. 16 16.2% 22.9% 9. 1 1.0% 1.4% 10. 2 2.0% 2.9% 11. 7 7.1% 10.0% Total responses 99 100.0% 141.4% 70 253 5 16 24 1 29 28 1. 13 10 313 5 2. 16 15 308 5 3. 1 1 322 5 4. 30 20 303 5 5. 15 16 307 5 6. 9 8 315 5 7. 4 3 320 5 8. 22 16 307 5 9. 1 1 322 5 10. 2 2 321 5

289 325 109 34 289 8 1 10 141. 122 301. 289 30 1. 109 34 2. 216 66 N=325 «19» 30 1. 109 33.2% 33.5% 33.5% 2. 216 65.9% 66.5% 100.0% 325 99.1% 100.0% 3 0.9% 3 0.9% 328 100.0% 31 30 1 1. 1 50 15.2% 56.2% 56.2% 2. 2 15 4.6% 16.9% 73.0% 3. 3 8 2.4% 9.0% 82.0% 4. 4 3 0.9% 3.4% 85.4% 5. 5 3 0.9% 3.4% 88.8% 6. 6 1 0.3% 1.1% 89.9% 7. 7 2 0.6% 2.2% 92.1% 8. 8 2 0.6% 2.2% 94.4% 9. 9 0 0.0% 0.0% 94.4% 10. 10 5 1.5% 5.6% 100.0% 89 27.1% 100.0% 216 65.9% 23 7.0% 239 72.9% 328 100.0% 1. 109 89 17

30 1 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 65 35 14 14 33 5 67 32 9 9 «20» 30 1. 109 108 7. 67 62 1. 65 60 2. 35 32 5. 33 31 32 30 1 Pct of Pct of Dichotomy label Count Responses Cases 1. 65 25.9% 60.2% 2. 35 13.9% 32.4% 3. 14 5.6% 13.0% 4. 14 5.6% 13.0% 5. 33 13.1% 30.6% 6. 5 2.0% 4.6% 7. 67 26.7% 62.0% 8. 9 3.6% 8.3% 9. 9 3.6% 8.3% Total responses 251 100.0% 232.4% 108 216 4 18

99 318 45 14 99 9 1 2 16 34 33 2. 273 86 1. 45 14 N=318 «21» 33 1. 45 13.7% 14.2% 14.2% 2. 273 83.2% 85.8% 100.0% 318 97.0% 100.0% 10 3.0% 10 3.0% 328 100.0% 34 33 1 1. 1 22 6.7% 51.2% 51.2% 2. 2 11 3.4% 25.6% 76.7% 3. 3 5 1.5% 11.6% 88.4% 4. 4 1 0.3% 2.3% 90.7% 5. 5 0 0.0% 0.0% 90.7% 6. 6 1 0.3% 2.3% 93.0% 7. 7 2 0.6% 4.7% 97.7% 8. 8 0 0.0% 0.0% 97.7% 9. 9 0 0.0% 0.0% 97.7% 10. 10 1 0.3% 2.3% 100.0% 43 13.1% 100.0% 273 83.2% 12 3.7% 285 86.9% 328 100.0% 33 1. 45 43 19

20