2014 2 10 RCT EAMS 2014 2015. 3. 31 Evidence Reports of Anma-Massage-Shiatsu: 2 Meta-Analisys and 10 Randomized Controlled Trials of Japan 31 Mar 2015
CONTENTS 1. (prologue).. 1 2. (steps for development of structured abstracts) 1 (1) 2 (2) 3 (3).. 4 (4) 5 3. (conflict of interests) 8 4. (acknowledgement). 8 5. (contact point).. 8 6. (structured abstract and included references list,12).. 10 7. (excluded references list, 24)... 12 8. (structured abstracts describing ) 17
1. (prologue) ( ) (evidence-based medicine: EBM) 22 23 ( ) 1983 2010 ( ) (randomized controlled trial RCT) 18 26 ( : ) (2010 5 21 ) RCT 2. (steps for development of structured abstracts) (structured abstractssa ) SA ( ) (1) 1) ( ) ( ) 1
NPO Web 2) 2010 5 21 2014 12 2 ( ) Table 1 Web RD () RCT 2011 (EAMS 2011)311WHO International Standard Terminology (Table 1) Table 1 : Web2010.5.21 2014.12.2 2014 12 2 No. #1 #2 ( /AL or /AL or /AL or /TH or /AL or pointillage/al or Shiatzu/AL or shiatsu/al or "finger pressure"/al or Acupressure/AL or acupressurist/al or "Zhi Ya"/AL or "Chih Ya"/AL or manipulation/al or manipulative/al or /AL or /AL) AND PDAT=2010/05/21:// ( /TH or /AL or /AL or /AL or /AL or /AL or massage/al or masseur/al or masseuse/al or massagist/al or massotherap/al) AND PDAT=2010/05/21:// 2,082 3,507 #3 #1 or #2 5,413 #4 ( /AL or reflexolog/al or /AL or "Zone Therap"/AL or /AL or naprapath/al or /AL or chiropractic/al or chiropraxis/al or /AL) AND PDAT=2010/05/21:// 417 #5 #1 or #2 or #4 5,592 #6 #5 and RD= 3 #7 #5 and RD= not #6 6 #8 #5 and RD= not #6 not #7 66 #9 #5 and RD= not #6 not #7 not #8 20 #10 #5 and /TH not #6 not #7 not #8 not #9 73 #11 #5 and RD= not #6 not #7 not #8 not #9 not #10 226 #12 (#6 or #7 or #8 or #9 or #10 or #11) 394 2
(AKA) 2) 5,592 (Table 1, #5) 168 ( 3.1%) (Table 1, #6-#10) 3 6 66 20 73 (Table 1, #6-#10) (2) 168 () () 4 reviewer 2 reviewer ( ) ( ) a d a. b. c. d. a f a. 3
b. AKA- c. d. e. f. 1) SA 168 54 ( 3 4 ) 76 130 ( 77.4%) 76 1 3 4 (3) 38 1 () 1 2 SA 36 Table 2 Table 2 : 36 2 0 2 11 3 14 ( ) 4 1 5 8 1 9 6 0 6 31 5 36 36 2 SA 19 () 9 28 (Table 3) 4
reviewer SA 2 2 reviewer Table 3 : No. 1. ( ) 2. 1. 2. 2. (randomized controlled trial: RCT) (quasi- randomized controlled trial: quasi-rct) RCT 3) 2 34 10 SA 2 12 24 SA 12 24 5
(4) Table 4 Table 4 : (SA) : : 168 (2014.12.2.) : 54 : 76 ( 4 ) 1 1 : 36 () 24 SA : 12 SA (2015.03.31) 6
1) (EAMS 2014) 12 SA 2 10 study ICD (International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems) 4 SA Table 5 EKAT 2010-345 RCT- (EKAT 2010) ICD EKAT EAMS 2014 Table 5 : no. ICD10 ICD10 EKAT EAMS 1 A00-B99 0, 2 C00-D48 0 3 D50-D89 0 4 E00-E90, 0 5 F00-F99 1 6 G00-G99 7 H00-H59 0 8 H60-H95 0 9 I00-I99 0 10 J00-J99 11 K00-K93 0 12 L00-L99 0 13 M00-M99 2 14 N00-N99 15 O00-O99, 0 16 P00-P96 0 17 Q00-Q99,, 0 18 R00-R99, 6 19 S00-T98, 0 20 V00-Y98 0 21 Z00-Z99 1 22 U00-U99 0 0 0 0 7
2) SA EKAT 201012 11 11: 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) 8) 9) 10) Abstractor 11) Abstractor and date (sensitivity) 4. (acknowledgement) 5. (contact point) fujii@k.tsukuba-tech.ac.jp 8
1),,,. 2011 18 RCT. http://jhes.umin.ac.jp/abstract/eams2011j.pdf.2011. 2). Web. http://www.jamas.or.jp/service/ichu/about.html. 2014 12 2. 9
6 (Structured abstract and included references list, 12) 12 studyrct quasi-rct ICD-10 No. 1) ICD-10 ( ) 2) research question 3) 4) design 5) source 6) I 1) (0, 2) Research question,,,... 2013; 38(2): 63-74 design metaanalysis sourc e I 18 /,. /.. 2012; 25: metaanalysis I 19 30-39. 2) RCT quasi-rct (1, 9) 1 0, 0 2, 0, 0 3 0, 0 4 0, 0 5 0, 1 ICD-10 Research question design source,,. F419. RCT I 20. 2013; 24: 1-4. 10
6 0, 0 7 0, 0 8 0, 0 9 0, 0 10 0, 0 11 0, 0 12 0, 0 13 0, 2 ICD-10 179 6269 Research question ( ),. ( ).. 2010; 9 (1): 36-42.,... 2010; 16 (4): 51-55. design source RCT I 21 quasi-rct I 22 14 0, 0 15 0, 0 16 0, 0 17 0, 0 18 1, 5 Research ICD-10 question 17 23 46.6 600 Chen J, Sadakata M, Ishida M, et al.. The Tohoku Journal of Experimental Medicine. 2011; 223 (2): 97-102.,,,... 2010; 34 (3): 177-184.,,,... 2013; 39 (13): 1938-1940.,... 2009; 9: 43-48. design source quasi-rct I 23 quasi-rct I 24 RCT I 25 RCT I 26 11
600,,,... 2014; 39 (2): 47-52. RCT cross over I 27 688,... 2009; 9: 19-25. RCT cross over I 28 19 0, 0 20 0, 0 21 0, 1 ICD-10 51.5 Research question,,... 2010; 12 (2): 1-10. design source RCT I 29 22 0, 0 7(excluded references list, 24) SA 24 I 1) 2) (RCT) 3) 4) 5) 6) 1 0, 0 2, 0, 0 3 0, 0 4 0, 0 12
5 0, 2 ICD-10 Research Question Satoh S, Kajiwara M, Kiyokawa E, et rivastigmine al. F009 rivastigmine. Geriatrics & Gerontology International. 2013; 13(2): 515-516.,,,. F519.. 2010; 7 (2): 87-93. design source RCT I 5) quasi-rct I 2) 6 0, 1 ICD-10 Research Question Nakayama Y, Inada K, Oshima T,et al. G71.0. Journal of Tokushima National Hospital. 2010; 1: 26-30. design source I 2) 7 0, 0 8 0, 0 9 0, 1 ICD-10 Research Question,. I64.. 2014; 13 (1): 47-55. design source I 2) 10 0, 0 11 0, 0 12 0, 0 13 0, 3 ICD-10 Research Question,,,. Ⅿ6269.. 2013; 38 (2): 35-40. design source RCT I 6) 13
,,. M6281.. RCT cross over I 1) 2013; 36: 178-183.,,, M70.8. quasi-rct I 5).. 2013; 51: 19-23. 14 0, 1 ICD-10 Research Question design source,,,. N946.. 2011; 52 (1): 129-138. RCT I 1) 15 1, 0 ICD-10 Research Question 1. 1 O90.9.. 2012; 32: 536. design source RCT I 2) 16 0, 0 17 0, 0 18 2, 5 ICD-10 Research Question design source,,. R11. : II. 2014; 44: 133-136. I 2),,. R198 II. 2012; 42: 64-67.. : I 2) R451,,,. ( 2 ) RCT I 5).. 2013; 58 (1): 37. R522,,,. RCT I 5) 14
.. 2011; 40: 69.,,. R600 quasi-rct I 1).. 2013; 13 (1): 25-32.,. R600 RCT I 5).. 2014; 26 (1): 64-72.,, R688,. I 2).. 2012; 57 (4): 135-141. 19 0, 0 20 0, 0 21 1, 7 ICD-10 Research Question Z50.9 Z51.5 Z51.5 Z51.5 Z73.3,... 2014; 4 (2): 55-63.,,,... 2012; 5 (2): 49-58.... 2012; 35 (1): 89-98.,,... 2013; 18 (3): 395-400.,,... design source RCT I 6) RCT cross over RCT cross over I 2) I 6) I 2) quasi-rct I 3) 15
2013; 15 (1): 49-54.. Z73.3 quasi-rct I 6).. 2014; 12 (1): 30-31.,. Z73.3 RCT I 6).. 2014; 20 (1): 47-56.,,,. Z73.3 quasi-rct I 6).. 2012; 16 (3): 268-282. 22 0, 0 16
8. Structured abstracts describing (meta-analysis 2 RCT 10) IDweb ID 17
2014,,,... 2013; 38(2): 63-74. 1. 2. 3. 4. 4 reviwer 5. Web reviwer 6. 1) 10,669 105 3 3 45 19 35 2) 39 reviwer 18 7. 8. 9. Abstractor Web 10. Abstractor and date 2015.3.18 JM13216 18
2014,... 2012; 25: 30-39. 1. 2. 3. and or and and and PubMed massage & infant neonate or baby 16 7 4. 15 5 2 1 100 2 50 100 1 10 50 14 10 2 5. 16 4 2 plastic swaddler 1 6. 16 7 5 1 7. 8 7 3 4 2 2 2 8. 9. 10. Abstractor 1 PubMed 11. Abstractor and date 2015.3.31 JM12210 19
2014,,... 2013; 24: 1-4. web ID 2014250175 1. TM( : ) QOL 2. 2 RCT( ) 3. 4. (3 ) 13 ( ) 5. Arm 1 : TM (Cont) 37 ( 54.8±9.6 ) Arm 2 : (Cont) TM 6 ( 62.4±3.6 ) 6. STAI ( ) VAS (QOL ) BPRS ( ) CID ( ) 7. 1) TM (p < 0.032) (TM -0.6±1.0 0.3±0.6) 2) CID( ) TM (p < 0.017) (TM 1.0±21.3-64.74±6.2) 8. TM CID 9. 10. Abstractor 108 13 3 CID 11. Abstractor and date 2015.3.25 JM13201 20
2014,. ( ).. 2010; 9(1): 36-42. web ID 2011149782 1. ( ) 2. 3. 4. Kellgren-Lawrence 50 40 ( 31 9 ) 5. Arm 1 : 20 ( 13 7 70.7 ) Arm 2 : 20 ( 18 2 70.2 ) : 2 2 (1% 0.5% ) ( ) 2 3 6. JOA JKOM TUG 7. 2 4 JOA JKOM (p<0. 05) JKOM ADL (p<0.05)jkom 1 8. 9. 10. Abstractor OA RCT 11. Abstractor and date 2015.3.24 JM10040 21
2014,... 2010; 16 (4): 51-55. web ID 2011082670 1. 2. 3. 4. 22 22 ( 25.7±5.4 ) 5. Arm 1 : ( ) Arm 2 : () Arm 3 : ( ) () () 24 5 48 6. (Visual Analogue Scale) ( ) ( ) 7. 1) 3 2448 (53 46 ) (p < 0.05) 2) 2 100%24 48 103.2% 101.2% (p < 0.05) 3) 8. 9. 10. Abstractor 2 ( ) VAS 11. Abstractor and date 2015.3.24 JM10203 22
2014 Chen Jun, Sadakata Mieko, Ishida Mayumi, et al.. The Tohoku Journal of Experimental Medicine. 2011; 223(2) : 97-102. web ID 2011323377 1. 2. 3. 4. 69 ( 37 41 2,800 3,600g) 5. Arm 1 : 29 (1 2 15-20 5 7 ) Arm 2 : 40 ( 18 ) 6. (1~5 ) (1~5 ) (4 ) 7. 1) : 1 2 (3.3, 2.6)(4.6, 4.3) (p<0.05, p<0.01) 3 5 2) : 1 2 5 (p< 0.05) 3) : (13.7±1.7 mg/dl) (11.7±2.8 mg/ml) (p<0.01) 8. 9. 10. Abstractor RCT 11. Abstractor and date 2015.3.12 JM10120 23
2014,,,... 2010; 34(3): 177-184. web ID 2011032102 1. 2. (quasi-rct) 3. 4. (50 ) 20 5. Arm1 : 10 ( 5 16 ) Arm2 : () 10 6. 3D 7. 1) : 0.5 4 1 (p <0.01) 2) 3D : (p =0.015) 3) : (p <0.05) (p <0.01) 8. 9. 10. Abstractor 16 11. Abstractor and date 2015.3.18 JM10050 24
2014,,,... 2013; 39(13): 1938-1940. web ID 2014039736 1. 2. 2 RCT 3. 4. 166 ( ) 5. Arm 1 : (M) 83 ( : 32 : 51 ) Arm 2 : (C) 83 ( : 33 : 50 ) 6. VAS( ())( COCORO NETER) 7. 1) VASscore M (p<0.01) 2) M (p<0.05)c (p < 0.05) 8. 9. 10. Abstractor 2 VAS 11. Abstractor and date 2015.3.25 JM13203 25
2014,... 2009; 9: 43-48. web ID 2011046555 1. 2. (cross over) (RCT-cross over) 3. A 4. 60 9 ( 3 6 73.1±10.6 ) 8 1 5. Arm 1 : 9 Arm 2 : 9 Arm 3 : 9 3940 20 20 10 6. () (8 5 40 ) 7. 2.8 0.2 1.8 7.2 1.8 2.3 (p<0.01) (p<0.05) 25.2 26 35.2 8. + 9. 10. Abstractor 3 11. Abstractor and date 2015.3.24 JM09201 26
2014,,,... 2014; 39(2): 47-52. web ID P107570007 1. 2. (cross over) (RCT-cross over) 3. 4. 5. 26.0±1.0 50±5% 15 ( 7.5 7.5 ) Arm1 : 10 Arm2 : ( 7.5 7.5 ) 10 6. Visual Analogue Scale(VAS) POMS 7. 1) : (p<0.05)(p<0.01) 2) : (p < 0.05) () () (p < 0.01) (p < 0.01) 3) (VAS) : (p < 0.01) (p < 0.05). 4) POMS : (p<0.05) (p < 0.05) 8. 9. 10. Abstractor 11. Abstractor and date 2015.3.17 JM14208 27
2014,... 2009; 9: 19-25. web ID 2011046551 1. 2. (cross over) (RCT-cross over) 3. ( : 26.0±5.2 : 57.2±9.5%) 4. 24 18 28.3±5.2 5. Arm 1 : ( 10 ) 18 Arm 2 : ( 45 ) 18 2 10 20 6. (510 15 20 ) ( ) () 7. 33.5 35 20 35.3 4 (p<0.01) 34 2 ( ) 100 (: p<0.05 : p<0.01) 14 10 8. () 9. 10. Abstractor RCT 20 11. Abstractor and date 2015.3.24 JM09202 28
2014,,,... 2010; 12(2): 1-10. web ID 2011057560 1. 2. (quasi-rct) 3. 2 1 4. 18 20 5. Arm 1 : ( 1 10 )10 Arm 2 : () 10 6. POMS STAI J SACL 7. POMS STAI J SACL 1) POMS : -- - 2) STAI : 3) J SACL : 4) : (p < 0.05) 8. 9. 10. Abstractor 10 11. Abstractor and date 2015.3.19 JM10070 29