23 A Comparison of Flick and Ring Document Scrolling in Touch-based Mobile Phones 1120220 2012 3 1
iphone..,. 2 (, ) 3 (,, ),,,.,..,. HCI i
Abstract A Comparison of Flick and Ring Document Scrolling in Touch-based Mobile Phones Shinpei IWANAMI Touch-based mobile phones, such as iphone are gaining popularity in recent years. Although much research has investigated how the user interacts with the smartphone in the activity of standing and sitting, there is no study to investigate the interaction between the user and the smartphone for walking. In this thesis, for two motor activities walking and sitting, we quantitatively analyzed the performance of two scrolling techniques (flick and ring) for document navigation in touch-based mobile phones by means of three input methods (index finger, pen and thumb) in terms of movement time, error rate and subject evaluation. We found that overall, for sitting and walking, flick resulted in shorter movement time than ring. In addition, walking led to a higher error rate than sitting. The subject evaluation showed that for sitting and walking, index input is the best preferred technique, and thumb input is the worst preferred technique. key words HCI, touch-based interfaces, pen, finger, flick scroll, ring scroll, walking experiment. ii
1 1 1.1...................................... 1 1.2...................................... 1 2 3 2.1....... 3 2.2... 3 3 5 3.1.................................... 5 3.2................................... 5 3.3................................. 6 3.3.1.................... 6 3.3.2...................... 7 3.3.3............................... 8 3.3.4................................ 9 3.4.................................. 10 3.5................................... 10 4 12 4.1 MT............................... 12 4.1.1............... 13 4.1.2... 14 4.2 ER............................... 16 4.2.1............... 17 iii
4.2.2.. 18 4.3................................... 20 4.3.1............................... 20 4.3.2............................. 20 4.3.3............................... 21 4.3.4............................... 22 4.3.5............................ 23 5 25 5.1...................................... 25 5.1.1................................ 25 5.1.2................................ 25 5.1.3................................ 26 5.2.................................. 26 5.2.1.................... 26 5.2.2 ipad.......... 27 6 28 30 31 iv
3.1 HTC touch2.................................. 6 3.2.............................. 6 3.3................................ 8 3.4................................... 9 4.1 MT.......................... 12 4.2 MT D=20................................. 13 4.3 MT D=60................................. 14 4.4 MT D=200................................. 14 4.5 MT....... 15 4.6 MT...... 16 4.7 ER........................ 16 4.8 ER D=20.................................. 17 4.9 ER D=60.................................. 18 4.10 ER D=200................................. 18 4.11 ER.......... 19 4.12 ER......... 19 4.13............................. 20 4.14............................ 21 4.15............................. 22 4.16............................... 23 4.17................................ 24 v
3.1................... 7 vi
1 1.1,.,,, [1],. 1.2.,,.., [1],., 1
1.2..,..,.,.. 2
2 2.1 FU Comparison between Ring and Flicking Scrolling Techniques for Document Navigation in Touch-based Mobile Devices [1].,, 3 2.,.,.. 2.2 [2].,, 12. 3
2.2,,,.,,,.,. 4
3 3.1 20 23 ( 21.3 ) 10 2. ( ) 3.2 HTC HTC touch2( 3.1). OS Microsoft Windows Mobile 6.5 Professional 104 55 12.9mm 110g 240 320 pixel 43 57mm 7.5cm 3.2. 5
3.3 3.1 HTC touch2 3.2 3.3 3.3.1. 4km., 4km,. 6
3.3. 1.8km. 1.8km. 3.3.2 2 3. 2.... 3,, ( 3.3). 2,,, 3 ( 3.1).,. 3.1 Pen Index Thumb Ring RP RI RT Flick FP FI FT 7
3.3 3.3 3.3.3 (W) (D). ( 3.4). 3, 6, 12 3. 21pixel ( 3.4). 20, 60, 200 3... 8
3.3 3.4 3.3.4 (W ) 3 (D) 3 5 3 2 270 12 12 270 3240 9
3.4 3.4. 1.,, 2. 1 3., 4.,. 5.. 6.. 7... 8.,,,. 3.5 MT (Movement Time) ER(Error Rate),. 10
3.5,,,.,.,. 11
4 4.1 MT 4.1 2 3., 3.1. RP FP (F 1,107 = 7.92, p = 0.006). RI FI (F 1,107 = 42.03, p = 2.84E 09). RT FT (F 1,107 = 19.78, p = 0.00002).. 4.1 MT 12
4.1 MT 4.1.1 4.2 4.4 (D). 4.2 D 20. RP FP (F 1,35 = 24.29, p = 0.00001), RI FI (F 1,35 = 19.47, p = 0.00009), RT FT (F 1,35 = 10.26, p = 0.003). 4.3 D 60. RI FI (F 1,35 = 12.52, p = 0.001), RT FT (F 1,35 = 12.73, p = 0.001). 4.4 D 200. RI FI (F 1,35 = 11.17, p = 0.002). 4.2 MT D=20 13
4.1 MT 4.3 MT D=60 4.4 MT D=200 4.1.2 4.5,. RP (F 1,107 = 9.01, p = 0.003). RI (F 1,107 = 11.40, p = 0.001) 14
4.1 MT. 4.5 MT 4.6,. FP (F 1,107 = 6.28, p = 0.014). FI (F 1,107 = 15.92, p = 0.0001). 15
4.2 ER 4.6 MT 4.2 ER 4.7 3. RP FP (F 1,107 = 5.19, p = 0.025). 4.7 ER 16
4.2 ER 4.2.1 4.8 4.10 (D). 4.8 D 20. 4.9 D 60. 4.10 D 200.. 4.8 ER D=20 17
4.2 ER 4.9 ER D=60 4.10 ER D=200 4.2.2 4.11,.. 18
4.2 ER 4.11 ER 4.12,.. 4.12 ER 19
4.3 4.3,,, 7. 1( ) 7( ). 4.13 4.16. 4.3.1 4.13.,.,. 4.13 4.3.2 4.14., 20
4.3.,. 4.14 4.3.3 4.15.,.,. 21
4.3 4.15 4.3.4 4.16.,.,. 22
4.3 4.16 4.3.5 4.17 4.,.,. 23
4.3 4.17 24
5 5.1 5.1.1 [1],.,,,. 5.1.2,.,.,,,,,., 25
5.2. 5.1.3,,.,...,,.,,,. 5.2,. ipad 5.2.1 20 20.., 10 65 26
5.2.,. 5.2.2 ipad ipad,.,.. 27
6 iphone,..,,.,,.,.,,,.,.,.,,,,,.,... 28
,..,,. 29
TU Huawei, FU Yuan, 30
[1] Fu, Y., Tu, H., and Ren, X. (2011). Comparison between Ring and Flicking Scrolling Techniques for Document Navigation in Touch-based Mobile Devices, Proceedings of FIT2011, pp.669-670. [2] : (2011). 31