B0TB2053 20014 3 31
[1], B0TB2053, 20014 3 31. i
1 1 2 3 2.1........................ 3 2.2........................... 3 2.3............................. 4 2.3.1..................... 4 2.3.2.................... 5 3 7 3.1............... 7 3.2......................... 9 3.3............................. 10 3.4........................ 11 3.4.1........................ 12 3.4.2.......................... 12 4 14 4.1................................ 14 4.2.................................. 15 4.3.................................. 15 5 17 18 ii
1 Web (1) i ϕ i (1) ϕ i (1) [2] (2) (2) j (ϕ j ) [3] [4, 5] 1
(2) [1] 2 3 4 5 2
2 [3] [4, 5] [6, 1] 2.1 [7] Salience Reference List (SRL) [3] SRL 1. 2. 3. SRL 2.2 [7] [8] [4] [5] 3
2.3 2.2. [9] [10] (3)a. (3)b. (3) a. ϕ b. ϕ [6, 1] 2.3.1 [11] [6] (4)a. (4)b. (4) a. ϕ 4
b. 2.3.2 2 [1] (5) (5) 1 1 5
1: 5715 36560 372219 268351 791 4404 80366 36662 764 3574 68876 35170 490 2843 54816 14730 306 1355 23074 11530 288 1205 7735 10926 274 1200 6629 6537 139 1133 5204 6129 6
3 2.3.2 3.1 2.3.2 (6) (6) (ϕ ) (6) 2 [12] (7)a,b 7
2: 964006 510058 20379 31508 20244 12834 19030 6828 16150 6776 13686 5873 9139 5789 8876 5354 (7) a. b. (7)a (7)b 3 (7)a,b 3 1 3: 45142 2865 70515 5908 297 4782 1338 240 3802 1254 177 2457 1209 104 2356 997 93 1227 8
3.2 3.1 [13] [14] (8)a1. a2. b1. b2. c1. c2. (8)a (8)b (8)c (8)a (8)a (8)c web (8)a1 9
4 4: 964006 1361 96708 20379 143 4245 20244 120 3907 19030 84 3712 16150 63 2404 13686 42 1790 9139 36 1558 8876 34 1490 223 [12] 1. 2. 3. 4. 3.3 3.1 1 10
(9) a. b. (9)a,b (9)b 5 (9)a 2 5: 2865 70515 390 4782 85 3802 56 2457 52 2356 42 1227 3.4 11
3.4.1 2.3.2 2 p,q Sim(p, q) Sim(p, q) = cos(p, q) = p(x)q(x) p(x) q(x) 2 3.4.2 n h i H = h 1, h 2,..., h n n p n H Score sim (p, H) = max i Sim(p, h i ) Score sim (, {, }) = max({score sim (, ), Score sim (, )}) = max({0.504472, 0.670937}) = 0.670937 12
(9)a 2 (10) ϕ 20 (10) Score sim (, ) Score sim (, ) 2 Score sim (, ) = 0.187310 Score sim (, ) = 0.685678 0.685678 0.276867,0.246791 13
4 4.1 3.2 3.3 3 MRR = 1 N n N 1 rank(n) N rank(n) n web 60 CaboCha 0.66[15] 5,895,225,186 1 169,260,929 NAIST 1.5 [16] 7854 NAIST 1.5 1 5 14
version 4.0 2 95 1 1 17 2 1 12 2 4 4.2 MRR 1 6 MRR 0.001 0.006 1 2 61 6: MRR, 1 MRR 1 0.733 4688 0.734 4690 0.739 4749 4.3 MRR 1 MRR 1 1 2 http://nlp.ist.i.kyoto-u.ac.jp/index.php 15
7 9 5 7: 552 295 730 447 web 21151 7854 37 16
5 17
18
[1],,... SLP,, Vol. 2011, No. 10, pp. 1 8, may 2011. [2] Ryu Iida, Kentaro Inui, and Yuji Matsumoto. Exploiting syntactic patterns as clues in zero-anaphora resolution. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Computational Linguistics and the 44th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL-44, pp. 625 632, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 2006. Association for Computational Linguistics. [3] Ryu Iida, Kentaro Inui, Hiroya Takamura, and Yuji Matsumoto. Incorporating contextual cues in trainable models for coreference resolution. In In Proceedings of the EACL Workshop on The Computational Treatment of Anaphora, pp. 23 30, 2003. [4],,. ( )., Vol. 45, No. 3, pp. 906 918, mar 2004. [5] Kenji Imamura, Kuniko Saito, and Tomoko Izumi. Discriminative approach to predicate-argument structure analysis with zero-anaphora resolution. [6],.. 16, Vol. 16, pp. 804 807, mar 2010. [7] Barbara J. Grosz, Scott Weinstein, and Aravind K. Joshi. Centering: A framework for modeling the local coherence of discourse. Computational Linguistics, Vol. 21, pp. 203 225, 1995. [8] Niyu Ge, John Hale, and Eugene Charniak. A statistical approach to anaphora resolution. In In Proceedings of the Sixth Workshop on Very Large Corpora, pp. 161 170, 1998. 19
[9]., 1999.9 1999. [10] Ryu Iida, Kentaro Inui, and Yuji Matsumoto. Zero-anaphora resolution by learning rich syntactic pattern features. 2007. [11] Roger C. Schank and Robert P. Abelson. Scripts, Plans, Goals and Understanding: an Inquiry into Human Knowledge Structures. L. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1977. [12].., 1991. [13].. 11, Vol. 11, pp. 337 340, mar 2005. [14],,,. : ( )., Vol. 47, No. 6, pp. 1963 1975, jun 2006. [15],.. Vol. 43, No. 6, pp. 1834 1842, 2002. [16],,,,. : Naist., Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 25 50, 2010. 20