3.dvi

Similar documents
社会階層と食生活

Bellah et al., 1985= : :




取扱説明書

, , % :

商学論叢 第52巻 第1号


02

DE-6001 取扱説明書


PSCHG000.PS


”Лï‡Æ™²“¸_‚æ4“ƒ__‘dflÅPDF‘‚‡«‘o‡µ.pdf

920P-1


広報しもつけp01ol




ONPRESS190

本文(B5×40)0614三校責了.indd

untitled


1-20*****B

地域活性化システム論カリキュラム研究会報告書

: 1

02_加藤隆雄.indd

1 No.3

ワークショップ

広報No.199.indd

1

p. p. p. p. p. p. p. p. p. Fraser[ ]

07上野.indd

社会学部紀要 128号☆/1.遠藤

情報化社会に関する全国調査中間報告書

00

73 ハイエク 自由の条件 にみる累進課税批判 福田あつ美 4 年 flat rate progressive rate

本文(横)  ※リュウミンL・カンマ使用/大扉●還暦記念論集用

Japanese Journal of Applied Psychology

kenkyujo_kiyo_09.ren

学歴内婚のシミュレーション分析

120101_01

120701_01

2002年度 同窓会通信 目次

To really understand you must go back and back and back counterfactual conditional Karl Popper, Logik der Forschung counterfactual conditional Biograp

mr0703.indd

120815_01C

本文(読点カエ)/093‐105

04-p45-67cs5.indd

復興における設備の近代化と西洋的感性

2

社会関係資本と外国人に対する寛容さに関する研究―JGSS-2008 の分析から―

八田

国家と掠奪(2)

feeling of sympathy with the people in pain and collectivity, investigating the meaning of death shared by consumers of contemporary dark tourism. Tod

emarketer SNS / SNS 2009 SNS 15 64

110301_01

40

なみよけ36_p01.ai

B


学会だより13.indd

untitled

i


自殺の経済社会的要因に関する調査研究報告書


101001_01

01社会学部研究紀要.indd

? ( ) () ( [2] [3] [7] ) ( [4, 5] [1] ) (0) (0) ) 1995 SSM 2.4 MANOVA 2 ( 1) ( 2) ( 3) 1)

...S.....\1_4.ai


Default Swap Bell Braverman Reich


110115_01

Z...QXD (Page 1)

_16_.indd

航海と情報

H /大学教育開発センターニュース(23).indd

本文/小路邦子3rd

LDI NOTES

目 次 序 戦 争 記 憶 戦 争 物 語 309

p6-18/村松様

Article 69

88 Merton 1957(orig. 1949): : Twitter Facebook SNS twilog 1 G. H. Mead

卒論本文(最新)

Managed Heart 1 29

- 1 1

社会科学(横組)22号/1 東・石田先生     p01‐13

合併後の交付税について

Harvey, M

untitled

1

_01野口.indd

pdf軽_台紙まとめ県民

ACS37_04咸.indd

8. Don Bissell, The First Conglomerate: 145 Years of the Singer Sewing Machine Company, Audenreed Press, 1999, p107.

untitled

Transcription:

3 1 4 6 5 6 4 5 1995 SSM Social Stratification and Social Mobility 5 1 2 3

1 V = 0.213** 175 (71.1%) 71 (28.9%) 246 163 (50.0%) 163 (50.0%) 326 V = 0.048 92 (37.4%) 154 (28.9%) 246 107 (32.8%) 219 (67.2%) 326 V = 0.112** 59 (24.0%) 187 (76.0%) 246 112 (34.4%) 214 (65.6%) 326 V = 0.022 31 (12.6%) 215 (87.4%) 246 46 (14.1%) 280 (85.9%) 326 V Cramer s V P<0.01 2 V = 0.181** 600 134 (66.0%) 69 (34.0%) 203 600 1000 115 (63.2%) 67 (36.8%) 182 1000 75 (45.5%) 90 (54.5%) 165 V = 0.243** 600 92 (45.3%) 111 (54.7%) 203 600 1000 69 (37.9%) 113 (62.1%) 182 1000 29 (17.6%) 136 (82.4%) 165 V = 0.188** 600 83 (40.9%) 120 (59.1%) 203 600 1000 42 (23.1%) 140 (76.9%) 182 1000 38 (23.0%) 127 (77.0%) 165 V = 0.052 600 32 (15.8%) 171 (84.2%) 203 600 1000 22 (12.1%) 160 (87.9%) 182 1000 20 (12.1%) 145 (87.9%) 165 V Cramer s V P<0.01

3 V = 0.156** 44 (78.6%) 12 (21.4%) 56 161 (61.0%) 103 (39.0%) 264 131 (52.4%) 119 (47.6%) 250 V = 0.190** 29 (51.8%) 27 (48.2%) 56 106 (40.2%) 158 (59.8%) 264 63 (25.2%) 187 (74.8%) 250 V = 0.153** 27 (48.2%) 29 (51.8%) 56 82 (31.1%) 182 (68.9%) 264 60 (24.0%) 190 (76.0%) 250 V = 0.094 12 (21.4%) 44 (78.6%) 56 28 (10.6%) 236 (89.4%) 264 35 (14.0%) 215 (86.0%) 250 V Cramer s V P<0.10, P<0.01 1 1% 1 V Cramer s V 2 28 1 12 2 3 1% V 2

600 600 1000 1000 1000 600 3 5 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 3 10% 1% 3 1 2 3 4 40.7% 573 235 69.6% 573 402 4

2 2.1 1995 SSM 1995 SSM [3] [ 3: 233 ] [ 3: 234 ] [ 3: 236 ] 58 [ 3: 250 ] 1995 SSM 2.2 3 2 3 2 2 3 3 4 5 4 5

4 600 56 (73.7%) 20 (26.3%) 76 600 1000 65 (75.6%) 21 (24.4%) 86 1000 49 (62.8%) 29 (37.2%) 78 170 (70.8%) 70 (29.2%) 240 χ 2 =3.661(d.f. =2),P =0.160 Cramer s V = 0.124 5 600 78 (61.4%) 49 (38.6%) 127 600 1000 50 (52.1%) 46 (47.9%) 96 1000 26 (30.2%) 60 (69.8%) 86 154 (49.8%) 155 (50.2%) 309 χ 2 =20.228(d.f. =2),P =0.000 Cramer s V = 0.256 2 2 4 10% 2 5 2 2 3 2 3 3 2 3 2.3

6 15 (88.2%) 2 (11.8%) 17 78 (75.7%) 25 (24.3%) 103 82 (65.1%) 44 (34.9%) 126 175 (71.1%) 71 (28.9%) 246 χ 2 =5.730(d.f. =2),P =0.057 Cramer s V = 0.153 7 29 (74.4%) 10 (25.6%) 39 83 (51.6%) 78 (48.4%) 161 49 (39.8%) 74 (60.2%) 123 161 (49.8%) 162 (50.2%) 323 χ 2 =14.490(d.f. =2),P =0.001 Cramer s V = 0.212 6 7 3 10% 1%

3 3.1 3 6 7 8 9 2 6 6-1 6-2 6-3 6-1 6-2 6-3 4 4 6-1 6-2 6-3 ( ) 4 1 2 3 8 9

8 0 ( 0%) 2 (100.0%) 2 10 (40.0%) 15 ( 60.0%) 25 9 (20.5%) 35 ( 79.5%) 44 19 (26.8%) 52 ( 73.2%) 71 χ 2 =3.859(d.f. =2),P =0.145 Cramer s V = 0.233 9 2 (20.0%) 8 (80.0%) 10 24 (31.2%) 53 (68.8%) 77 8 (10.8%) 53 (89.2%) 74 34 (21.1%) 127 (78.9%) 161 χ 2 =9.396(d.f. =2),P =0.009 Cramer s V = 0.242 3.2 10 11 6 7 3 10 11

10 1 (33.3%) 2 (66.7%) 3 18 (54.5%) 15 (45.5%) 33 23 (39.7%) 35 (60.3%) 58 42 (44.7%) 52 (55.3%) 94 χ 2 =2.048(d.f. =2),P =0.359 Cramer s V = 0.148 11 6 (42.9%) 8 (57.1%) 14 21 (28.4%) 53 (71.6%) 74 21 (24.1%) 66 (75.9%) 87 48 (27.4%) 127 (72.6%) 175 χ 2 =2.181(d.f. =2),P =0.336 Cramer s V = 0.112 3.3 10 11 [3] 3 [Bourdieu 2: 243 ]

[Bourdieu 1: 32 ] 4 [1] Bourdieu, Pierre, 1980, Le capital social: Notes provisoires, Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, 31: 2-3. 1986 actes 1: 30-36.

[2] Bourdieu, Pierre, 1983, Ökonomisches Kapital, kulturelles Kapital, soziales Kapital, Reinhard Kreckel hrsg. Sozial Ungleichheiten, Göttingen: Otto Schwartz, 183-198. 1986, translated by Richard Nice, The Forms of Capital, John G. Richardson ed., Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, New York: Greenwood Press, 241-258. [3] 2000 5 : 221-254