No.43 2008 12 Abstract The national pension system aims to provide a common "basic pension" to all residents in Japan. So, all people aged between 20 and 59 living in Japan must join the National Pension System and have to pay the premiums for more than 25 years. But, the situation surrounding a public pension plan has changed. After the collapse of the bubble economy, un-normalizing of the labor force advanced and the unemployment rate also rose. To recover severe financial condition, many companies carried out an aggressive employment adjustment and began to curb employment. As a result, the non-regular employees increased. In general, they have lower income than regular employees, and the rate of joining the national pension and paying national pension premium is not so high. If they can t pay the pension premium for financial reasons, they won t receive any pension back in the future. This paper clarifies the points of national pension issues of young non-regular employees, in particular on the burden of pension premiums and benefits issues. 2008 20 60 1991 21 3 1-1 -
2 1 20 34 20 60 65 1) 1 2 3 2 3 2 2008 3 1 2,035 2 3,457 3 1,063 6,555 2) 2006 3 460 1 2 1996 2 1997 2003 1 1 2 1 3-2 -
No.43 2008 12 1 2004 2 1 1 2007 2 2006 3 1 3 1 1 3 3 1 2 3 1992 193 1 2004 36 12 5 1 2-3 -
2 1995 125 1 20 29 1997 20 2 3 1 2 3 1 1 2008 :20 3 1 1995 16 2 20 59 4-4 -
No.43 2008 12 8 1 1 53% 1 22 6 4 20 59 18 2 1 2005 12.1% 24.9 4 5 2007 :26-5 -
5 1 36 17 1990 1992 10 3 2007 2007 5,050 3,439 68.1% 1,610 31.9% 3 1 2005 1947 1949 1 2006 31.6% 6 1 2 1 1 2-6 -
No.43 2008 12 6 1 2 1 2005 1 1,896 3000 897 7000 47.3 198 2000 10.5 1 1 481 9000 25.4% 176 8000 9.3% 141 8000 7.5% 7 2 6000 14 1000 70 3000 1 155 2000 1.5 1 1 25.4% 4 1 1-7 -
7 17 65 3 25 792,100 66,008 2008 40 40 5 1 1 20 34 1 25 29 38.0% 20 34 3 1 1 8 20 30 1 1 8 1-8 -
No.43 2008 12 1 8 2 3 1 20 24 51.3% 25 29 48.2% 30 34 43.0 4 35 9 8 1 17 9 17 1 66.1% 4.8% 84.9% 1-9 -
2 1 10 10 17 60 3 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 12 20 34-10 -
No.43 2008 12 11 1 5 20 34 6 20 34 12 12 1 1 2 17 6 13-11 -
13 1 17 1 1 1 165 9000 122 2000 1 104 6000 1 60 1 20 24 49 2000 25 29 89 8000 30 34 113 7000 1 1 150 14 14 1 17-12 -
No.43 2008 12 20 1992 2002 10 150 15.3% 21.8% 2006 2007 2007 6 6 31 8200 40.7 19 2900 43.5 16 16 19 http://www.mhlw.go.jp/toukei/itiran/roudou/chingin/kouzou/z07/xls/toukei.xls 4 20 34 300 399 26.9% 300 5 50-13 -
99 24.4% 100 149 22.0% 6 150 17 17 20 34 19 > > http://www.e-stat.go.jp/sg1/estat/list.do?bid=000001013824&cycode=0 40 2 1 1 1 4100 2008 1 2 3 1 1 40-14 -
No.43 2008 12 79 2100 6 6008 25 4 1000 2 1 2 13 2000 2 2003 4 2007 6 14.642% 3) 2 7.341% 2 2008 << 36.0 >> 40 23 2592 2 13 2000 10 576 2 3 1 20 34 6 150 2008 150 1 1 17 2920 4) 1 4410 12 11.5% 1 2005 25 5) 40 2 1-15 -
13 2000 national minimum 7 1 15 7000 2 13 83.8 67 2007 1 1 1 16 2-16 -
No.43 2008 12 1 1 2 3 2008 :28 2007 :41 20 3 II. HP http://www.sia.go.jp/topics/2006/n0808.html 1 16 9300 3,620 2005 2007 No.4 2 2008 2005 ESRI Discussion Paper Series No.140 2000 2004 2004 2006 2006-17 -
2006 18 2007 19 2007 18 2008 19 http://www.mhlw.go.jp/toukei/itiran/roudou/chingin/kouzou/z07/xls/toukei.xls 2007 57 17 2008 58 18 HP http://www.sia.go.jp/infom/tokei/index.htm http://www.sia.go.jp/infom/tokei/index.htm http://www.sia.go.jp/infom/tokei/index.htm 2005 14 http://www.sia.go.jp/infom/tokei/osirase2002/jittai-h14-summary.pdf 2008a 17 http://www.sia.go.jp/infom/tokei/osirase2002/jittai-h17-summary.pdf 2008b 18 20 3 http://www.sia.go.jp/infom/tokei/gaikyo2006/gaikyo.pdf 2008c 3 II. http://www.sia.go.jp/infom/tokei/geppou/ge2003/nenkin.pdf 2005 5 2008a 19 http://www.stat.go.jp/data/roudou/sokuhou/nen/dt/pdf/ndtindex.pdf 2004 14 2008b 19 http://www.e-stat.go.jp/sg1/estat/list.do?bid=000001013824&cycode=0 2007 16 2006 ISSUE BRIEF 528 2007a 19 2007b 19 2007 - - 158 30-44 2006 2007 5 ( ) ( ) - 18 -