2002 31 3 4 5 6 10 12 15 1 18 19 20 1

2002 31 3 4 5 6 10 12 15 1 18 19 20 1

2002 31 2 21 NATO 22 NATO 23 1 24 25 26 27 2 Soviet Industrial Location: A Reexamination 28 29 Department of History and Classics, University of Alberta 30 31 2

2002 31 2002 31 1 10 5 21 3 3 321 10:00 10:10 10:10 11:05 11:05 12:00 12:00 13:30 9 2 252 * 13:30 14:25 14:25 15:20 15:20 15:30 15:30 16:30 16:30 17:30 18:00 20:00 4 3 223 5 6,000 3

2002 31 2 10 6 1 3 2 248 9:30 10:30 1 10:30 11:30 2 11:30 12:30 3 2 9 2 249 9:30 10:30 1 10:30 11:30 2 NATO 11:30 12:30 3 NATO 12:30 13:30 1 2 2 1 2 9 252 4

2002 31 1 3 2 248 13:30 14:30 1 14:30 15:30 2 15:30 16:30 3 16:30 17:30 4 2 9 2 249 13:30-14:30 1 Soviet Industrial Location: A Reexamination 14:30-15:30 2 15:30 16:30 3 Department of History and Classics, University of Alberta 16:30 17:30 4 5

2002 31 1990 GDP 20 95 98 NBP 9 6

2002 31 2,500 98 1,500 20 10 4 7

2002 31 1970 2 10 2 5 70 8

2002 31 80 9

2002 31 2002 10 10 10 10 2000 2000 1999 12 HDZ 2000 2 10 13 10 3 1996 2000 12 2001 9 15 9 29 10 20 10 5 10

2002 31 11 10 11

2002 31 2000 2 "Russia's Ruinous Chechen War" 90 1990 9 12

2002 31 91 92 CIS 97 1 96 NIF 89 13

2002 31 98 98 99 98 97 98 98 4 3 2 99 8 14

2002 31 2 3 20 15

2002 31 1988 1997 949 1990 1970 1940 1995-98 1980 65 1927 1998 40 1947 1999 16

2002 31 1984 1950 1991 1984 1996 2000 2002 17

2002 31 2001 3 8 11 3 1986-95 1989 1989 18

2002 31 1998 10.4 1999 13.1 2000 15.1 2001 17.4 3 7 UV U(unemployment) V(vacancy) UV 1998 1999 GDP GDP 1 0.122 GDP 1999-2000 20 1998-1999 3 19

2002 31 1997 1998 FIDESZ 3 EU 1990 1990 3 1998 FIDESZ 3 1990 1998 FIDESZ 1998 20

2002 31 1917 1917 21

2002 31 NATO NATO 21 NATO NATO EU 22

2002 31 NATO NATO NATO NATO NATO NATO 2002 11 NATO NATO NATO NATO NATO NATO 5 NATO NATO NATO 9.11 NATO (interoperability) NATO NATO Czech-ness 23

2002 31 1993 1995 1997 24

2002 31 90 1992 1990 1990 2000 1 30 60 1990 3 1990 70 GDP 3 25

2002 31 26

2002 31 1990 2002 27

2002 31 Soviet Industrial Location: A Reexamination (* Kazuhiro KUMO (**(***, Faculty of Economics, the National University of Kagawa Abstract The aim of this study is twofold. First, the rich Soviet statistical collections prepared by Rossiiskiy Gosudarstvenniy Arkhiv Ekonomiki or RGAE, the Russian Governmental Economic Archives, is briefly introduced, following Turina (1999) and Nishimura and Iwasaki (1999). Then, second, long-term trends in per capita Soviet industrial output by region before and after the World War II are reexamined based on RGAE data, comparing the results with those obtained in Kumo(2000), which were calculated by the author s estimation methods. First, RGAE data is introduced based on Turina (1999), and Nishimura and Iwasaki (1999). After reviewed Soviet industrialization policy at the early stage, an overview of Soviet industrialization processes observed from RGAE data are briefly presented. Finally, results obtained by Kumo (1998, 2001 and 2002) are compared with those of RGAE data. The geographical distribution of high per capita industrial output regions obtained by RGAE is almost comparable with that of the author s estimation. Thus, the conclusion Kumo (1998, 2001 and 2002) obtained would be strongly supported by RGAE data. This may imply that Soviet statistics were not falsified but only concealed. (* This study was financially supported by the Grant in aid of the Ministry of Education, Science, Culture, Sports and Technology in Japan (Grant #14730043, 2002-2004), the Matsushita/Panasonic International Foundation (Grant #00-069 and #01-104, 2000-2002), the Nankai Scholarship Association (2001-2002), the Mishima Kaiun Memorial Foundation (2002-2003), the Kagawa University Grant for the Promotion of Science (2002-2003), and the Kagawa University International Exchange Fund (2002-2003), which are gratefully acknowledged. (** Ph.D. in Economics, Associate Professor, Department of Regional Science, Faculty of Economics, the National University of Kagawa, Japan. Correspondence to the author: Phone & Fax: +81-87-832-1908; e-mail: k-kumo@ec.kagawa-u.ac.jp (*** I acknowledge a dept of gratitude to Dr. Yoshiaki Nishimura of HIER and Dr. Ichiro Iwasaki of HIER for their generous agreement on using RGAE data which they collected at the HIER Library. My thanks are also extended to Miss Yumi Ito of the HIER Library for her generous assistance. 28

2002 31 2001 3 3 3 EU 2002 5 EU EU 2001 9 2001 11 2002 5 29

2002 31 Department of History and Classics, University of Alberta 1918 1944 1944 1944 1936 1920 1936 30

2002 31 94, 98, 02 CIS 96 (Super presidentialism) 98 93 94 98 31

2002 31 2002 31 2002 31 102-8554 7-1 32