~~ 2012
Logical positivism Logical empiricism 20c 1. analytic statementsynthetic statement 30 2.
3. 1. 1920 1930 1960 1 p p
2. 3. 1. a priori 2+3=5
a posteriori 2+3=5 2. 1 1 deduction 1 2 2 1 2 1 2 n n+1
A,B,C B B 3. 4. ex. 1..
1 2. 1 H1 20c A B A B A B A H H' e H e H' H1 H2 H1 H1
2 1 2 H1 H2 t E t E H1 H2 H1 H2 t 1. Deductive Nomological model DN E C1,C2,,Cn L1,L2,,Ln E T2 P2 C1 A B T1 P1 C2 P1 p2 L L1 L2 T2 P2
C L E C1,C2,,Cn,L1,L2,,Ln E C1,C2,,Cn,L1,L2,,Ln E 2. 1 1C L 2 C C 2 3. 1 2
A B iff A B 4. 1. 2.
natural kind term. 3. T1 T2 T3 1 2 2. 1. realism
2. under determination 2 16c 3. instrumentalism
NOA Natural Ontological Attitude Thomas Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1962) 1. 1
2 cf. 3 2. 1 2
3 3.. 1. hard core protective belt 2. 1 2 3negative heuristics
4positive heuristics 3 f=ma 3. ad hoc, for this, 4. 1. 2. (1) 1. 2 ES ips
2. 2 3. (1) racial psychology (2) 1) PTSD
2) 3) 4) (2) 4. (1) 1. 2. 3. (2) 65 A. B. 1973
(3)